Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Abstract
A series of novel Er3+ /Yb3+ co-doped 75TeO2 (25 x)Nb2 O5 xWO3 (TNW: x = 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 mol%) glasses have been prepared. Effect
of WO3 on the thermal stability and spectroscopic properties of Er3+ /Yb3+ co-doped niobic tellurite glasses have been investigated. With WO3
peak
content increasing from 0 to 15 mol%, the fluorescence full width at half maximum (FWHM), the peak of stimulated emission cross-section (e ),
the measured lifetime ( m ), and quantum efficiency () change from 71 nm, 8.47 1021 cm2 , 2.86 ms, 84.1% to 76 nm, 7.22 1021 cm2 , 3.14 ms,
peak
88.9%, respectively. The FWHM and e of Er3+ ions in different glass hosts were compared; the obtained data reveals that this new TNW4 glass
may be a potentially useful candidate material host for broadband amplifiers.
2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: TeO2 Nb2 O5 WO3 ; Thermal stability; Spectroscopic properties; Quantum efficiency
1. Introduction
Rare-earth-doped optical glasses are important materials for
optical fibers, optical amplifiers, and waveguide lasers [1,2]. Due
to the increasing demand for information capacity of wavelength
division multiplexing (WDM) networks, Er3+ -doped tellurite
glasses and tellurite-based fiber amplifiers with large stimulated emission cross-section and broad fluorescence width have
attracted significant attention for broadband applications [3,4].
A high gain of 50 dB and a wide bandwidth of 76 nm have been
reported for an Er3+ -doped tellurite fiber pumped at 1480 nm
[5], which also exhibited various excellent material properties
such as high refractive index, high dielectric constants, strength
and corrosion resistance and rare-earth ion solubility. However,
its poor glass thermal stability and strong upconversion phenomenon made it difficult to used in practice [4].
Recently, Lin et al. [6], and Dai et al. [7] reported Er3+ -doped
niobic tellurite glasses, which exhibited good thermal stability
and presented broadband properties. However, the lifetime of
Er3+ :4 I13/2 level in niobic tellurite glass is relative lower due to
a large number of Nb2 O5 with high refractive indices. Xu et al.
[8] reported the Er3+ -doped niobic tungsten tellurite glass shows
100
Table 1
The compositions and physical properties of the TNW glasses
Codes
Composition (mol%)
(g/cm3 )
a (1021 cm2 )
TNW1
TNW2
TNW3
TNW4
TNW5
TNW6
75TeO2 25Nb2 O5
75TeO2 22Nb2 O5 3WO3
75TeO2 19Nb2 O5 6WO3
75TeO2 16Nb2 O5 9WO3
75TeO2 13Nb2 O5 12WO3
75TeO2 10Nb2 O5 15WO3
5.482
5.521
5.563
5. 617
5.645
5.684
2.181
2.152
2.113
2.077
2.048
2.013
1.609/8.045
1.562/7.810
1.527/7.635
1.473/7.365
1.421/7.105
1.379/6.895
7.953
7.614
7.412
7.223
6.923
6.532
(1)
101
According to the McCumber theory [17], the stimulated emission cross-section e () of the 4 I13/2 4 I15/2 transition of Er3+
ions can be calculated from the absorption cross-section a (),
which are related by
h
e () = a () exp
(2)
kT
where h is the Plancks constant, k the Boltzmann constant, and
is the net free energy required to excite one Er3+ from the
4I
4
15/2 state to I13/2 state at temperature T. The a () and can
be calculated from the absorption spectra and using the method
provided in Ref. [18]. The absorption cross-section ( a ), stimulated emission cross-section ( e ) of Er3+ ions calculated by
McCumber theory of TNW4 glass is shown in Fig. 4. Cleary, it
can be seen that the peak of stimulated emission cross-section
peak
e of Er3+ ions in TNW4 glass reaches 7.98 1021 cm2 .
Table 2 lists the refractive index n, and the peak of emispeak
sion cross-section e
and FWHM of Er3+ ions in different
glass host. Previous studies [4] have shown the e value can be
increases with increasing refractive index of a glass host due
to the electric dipole transition of rare-earth ions increases as
the refractive index of the glass host [ e (n2 + 2)2 /n] increase.
From Table 2, it can be seen that the TNW4 glass has much
larger refractive index, therefore it provides larger stimulated
emission cross-section at 1.5 m bands. Because the broader
FWHM and the larger stimulated emission cross-section are beneficial to the amplificatory performance of EDFA, the value of
peak
FWHM e is often used as a semiquantitative indication of
the bandwidth. The larger the product, the better the properties of
peak
amplifier. The comparison of FWHM e in different glass
hosts indicates that the TNW4 glass is better than other glasses
as a host material for Er3+ -doped for a broadband amplifier [23].
3.4. Lifetimes and quantum efficiency
Er3+ :4 I13/2
4 I15/2
Er3+ :4 I
102
Table 2
peak
The refractive index n, the peak of emission cross-section e and FWHM in different glass hosts
peak
Glass hosts
FWHM (nm)
Germanate [19]
Silicate [20]
Phosphate [21]
Tellurite [22]
TNW4 (this work)
1.625
1.585
1.569
2.000
2.077
53
40
37
65
76
5.70
5.50
6.40
7.95
7.98
(1021 cm2 )
peak
FWHM e
302.1
220.0
236.8
516.8
606.4
(3)
where WMP is the multiphonon decay rate and WET is the energy
transfer rate between Er3+ ions. Since the Er3+ -doping concentrations in all of the samples are close, the energy transfer rate
of Er3+ Er3+ ions should also be close for all of the samples.
Therefore, it can be deduced that the compositional dependence
of measured lifetime of TNW glasses is mainly determined by
the joint effect of the radiative decay rate and the multiphonon
decay rate.
The radiative lifetimes of the 4 I13/2 level of Er3+ ions in TNW
glasses have been calculated according to the follow relationship
[25]:
Fig. 5. Fluorescence decay cure for Er3+ :4 I13/2 4 I15/2 emission of TNW1
glass.
of laser performance and treated as key parameters in the spectroscopic analysis [23]. Fig. 5 shows the fluorescence decay
curve for 1.5 m of Er3+ ions in TNW1 glasses, which is fitted
by single exponential functions thus determining that the measured lifetime m of the 4 I13/2 level is 2.86 ms, respectively. The
compositional dependence of lifetime of 4 I13/2 level and quantum efficiency of Er3+ :4 I13/2 4 I15/2 transition is also shown
in Fig. 6. Obviously, the lifetime and quantum efficiency all
increases with an increasing of WO3 content monotonically.
rad =
(4)
2J + 1
4
2
2J + 1 8cn abs () d
m
rad
(5)
And the quantum efficiency for all glasses samples is also presented in Fig. 6. Clearly, with an increasing of WO3 content,
both the radiative and the measured lifetime increase. Therefore
the quantum efficiency increases from 84.1% to 88.9% owing
to the decrease the multiphonon decay rate in the glass host.
4. Conclusion
The thermal stability and spectroscopic properties of
Er3+ /Yb3+ co-doped TeO2 Nb2 O5 WO3 glasses were investigated. It is found that the TNW4 glass shows broad emission
spectra at 1.55 m band with a large stimulated emission crosssection, while keeps the lifetime and intensity relative high.
Effect of WO3 content on 1.5 m band emission were also analyzed and discussed. The results indicate that in tungsten tellurite
glasses, proper amount of WO3 can be used as a modifier to
improve broadband properties.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
103
[8] S. Xu, S. Dai, J. Zhang, L. Hu, Z. Jiang, Chin. Opt. Lett. 2 (2004) 106.
[9] X. Feng, S. Tanabe, T. Hanada, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84 (2001) 165.
[10] T. Sekiya, N. Mochida, S. Ogawa, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 176 (1994)
105.
[11] X. Feng, C. Qi, F. Lin, H. Hu, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 256257 (1999)
372.
[12] X. Zhang, T. Xu, Q. Nie, S. Dai, X. Shen, X. Zhang, Spectrochim. Acta,
Part A 67 (2007) 246.
[13] X. Shen, Q.H. Nie, T.F. Xu, Y. Gao, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 61 (2005)
2827.
[14] S. Zhao, X. Wang, D. Fang, S. Xu, L. Hu, J. Alloys Compd. 424 (2006)
243.
[15] Y. Luo, J. Zhang, J. Sun, S. Lu, X. Wang, Opt. Maters 28 (2006) 255.
[16] T. Xu, X. Zhang, S. Dai, Q. Nie, X. Shen, X. Zhang, Physica B 389 (2007)
242247.
[17] D.E. McCumber, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) A954.
[18] W.J. Miniscalo, R.S. Quimby, Opt. Lett. 16 (1991) 258.
[19] H. Lin, E. Pun, S.Q. Man, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18 (2001) 602.
[20] X.L. Zou, T. Izumitani, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162 (1993) 68.
[21] S. Jiang, T. Luo, B.C. Hwang, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 263264 (2000)
364.
[22] H.C. Doo, G.C. Yong, H.K. Kyong, ETRI J. 23 (4) (2001) 151.
[23] J. Yang, S. Dai, Y. Zhou, L. Wen, L. Hu, Z. Jiang, J. Appl. Phys. 93 (2003)
977.
[24] S. Shen, M. Naftaly, A. Jha, Opt. Commun. 205 (2002) 101.