Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matric Number
BIT 3112
STAADPRO APPLICATION
Module Name
Type of
coursework
/Reference no.
BIT3112-A1
Title of the
coursework
Students
Declaration
I certify that this assignment is my own work and where materials have been used from other
resources, they have been properly acknowledged. I also understand that I will face all the
possibility of failing unit if the contents of this assignment are plagiarized.
Signed : ____________________
Date
: __________________
Tick as appropriate
Year
One
Year
Two
Marks obtained
Year
Three
Date Handout
Date Due
Date Received
Assessors
comments/
Feedback.
Students
comments
Name and
Signature of
Assessor
Date
Mr. Nahushananda
Chakravarthy
Name and
Signature of
Internal Verifier
Date
2.
All work must be submitted in the mode instructed by the module leader.
3.
Work submitted under the students name must only be the work of that student. All information sources must be
acknowledged. Plagiarism is a serious offence and will render offenders liable to disciplinary action as set out in the Kolej
Universiti Linton (and parent university) rules and regulation.
4.
Students MUST keep a copy of all submitted work for reference purposes prior to the original being handed in and returned.
This will provide proof that the work was completed, in the event that the work goes astray.
4.
Coursework received after the submission deadline without an authorised time extension will be marked if submitted within
two weeks of the initial deadline. However, the mark awarded will be the minimum (40%). Where the quality of work is
below a pass level (i.e. 40%), a mark of 0-39% will be awarded as appropriate.
5.
Whenever a candidate submits work after two weeks without an authorised extension, a mark of zero (0%) will be awarded.
Examiners may comment on the quality of the work for learning purposes.
6.
Requests for extensions of submission deadlines must be made in writing prior to the submission deadline to the module
leaders and must be supported by documentary evidence.
Level 3
70%+
First Class
60- 69%
Second Class
upper
50-59%
Second Class
lower
Well referenced and cited. Applies relevant research to current practice issue.
Capacity to analyse concepts and reframe arguments. Critically evaluates own
work. Selects specifics and appropriate theory to enhance arguments.
40-49%
Third class
Below
40%
Fails to meet the criteria and requirements of the assignment / exam. Limited
evidence of reading and underpinning knowledge. Limited analysis of evidence.
Misconceptions and basis errors of underpinning theory.