Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
Worries of a Geotechnical Engineer in Singapore
How do I design according to EC7?
How do I know if I have designed correctly?
How can I take advantage of EC7 to my favour?
Introduction
Change in Design Approach
Working state design:
Analyse expected working condition, then apply factor
of safety
Limit state design
Analyse various unexpected conditions, where loadings
are increase and resistances are reduced using partial
factors.
Prior to Eurocode 7
+
Working
Load
Fwl
Rs
Rb
Eurocode 7
,
,
+
/ +
&
Permanent +
Variation Loads
Fd = G Gk + Q Qk
/
Rs
,
,
,
,
Rb
Design Methods/Considerations
Design of piles shall be based on either:
Empirical or analytical calculations
Static load tests/dynamic load tests
Ground tests
10
11
Fd = G Gk + Q Qk
where G and
12
Symbol
Set
A1
A2
1.35
1.0
Favourable
1.0
1.0
Unfavourable
1.5
1.3
Unfavourable
Permanent
Variable
Favourable
13
Combination 1:
A1 + M1 + R1
Combination 2:
A2 + (M1 or M2) + R4
14
15
16
Example:
Action from superstructure:
- Permanent unfavourable action = 1000 kN
- Variable unfavourable action = 500 kN
Self-weight of pile = 200 kN
Total permanent unfavourable action = 1000 + 200
= 1200 kN
Total variable unfavourable load = 500 kN
Set A1:
Design Action, Vd = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
= 1.35 (1200) + 1.5 (500) = 2370 kN
Set A2:
Design Action, Vd = 1.0Gk + 1.3Qk
= 1.0 (1200) + 1.3 (500) = 1850 kN
17
18
19
20
21
where kn = factor (=0.5 for one half a std deviation below mean)
22
23
Scheniders method:
cuk = 24.6 - 0.5 x 6.059 = 21.6 kPa
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
Note:
For structures having sufficient stiffness and strength to transfer loads from
weak to strong piles, the above factors may be divided by 1.1.
10
15
20
1.94
(1.65)
1.85
(1.57)
1.83
(1.56)
1.82
(1.55)
1.81
(1.54)
1.90
(1.62)
1.76
(1.50)
1.70
(1.45)
1.67
(1.42)
1.66
(1.41)
Note:
Bracket values are values when using dynamic impact tests with signal
matching. Other notes available in NA to SS EN 1997-1:2010.
36
10
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.36
1.33
1.30
1.55
1.39
1.33
1.29
1.26
1.20
1.15
Note:
For structures having sufficient stiffness and strength to transfer loads from
weak to strong piles, the above factors may be divided by 1.1.
37
38
from:
Rbk = Ab qbk and Rsk = qsk As
where:
Ab = the nominal plan area of the base of the pile
As = the nominal surface area of the pile
Obtain the design resistances for each resistance set:
39
Symbol
R1
R4 without
explicit
verification
of SLS
R4 with
explicit
verification
of SLS
Base
1.0
1.7
1.5
Shaft
(compression)
1.0
1.5
1.3
Total/combined
(compression)
1.0
1.7
1.5
Shaft in tension
s,t
1.0
2.0
1.7
40
Symbol
R1
R4 without
explicit
verification
of SLS
R4 with
explicit
verification
of SLS
Base
1.0
2.0
1.7
Shaft
(compression)
1.0
1.6
1.4
Total/combined
(compression)
1.0
2.0
1.7
Shaft in tension
s,t
1.0
2.0
1.7
41
Symbol
R1
R4 without
explicit
verification
of SLS
R4 with
explicit
verification
of SLS
Base
1.0
2.0
1.7
Shaft
(compression)
1.0
1.6
1.4
Total/combined
(compression)
1.0
2.0
1.7
Shaft in tension
s,t
1.0
2.0
1.7
42
Design Methods/Considerations
R4 with or without explicit verification of SLS?
If serviceability is verified by load tests carried out on
more than 1% of the constructed piles to loads not less
than 1.5 times the representative load or if settlement at
serviceability limit state is of no concern.
Resistance is verified by a maintained load test taken to
the calculated, unfactored ultimate resistance.
Use the lower factors from R4 with explicit verification of
SLS.
43
44
Example 1: Compression
0.6m diameter
bored pile
Gk = 1000kN
Qk = 300 kN
0m
Sand
k = 32
k = 19kN/m3
4m
= 1800kN
Set A2: G = 1.0, Q = 1.3
Clay
Shaft: cuk = 80kPa
Base: cuk = 100kPa
= 1390kN
45
Example 1
0.6m diameter
bored pile
Gk = 1000kN
Qk = 300 kN
0m
2. Compute resistance:
Assume: Pile load test carried out
with verification of SLS
Sand
k = 32
k = 19kN/m3
4m
46
Example 1
0.6m diameter
bored pile
Gk = 1000kN
Qk = 300 kN
0m
2. Compute resistance:
Sand
k = 32
k = 18kN/m3
4m
= [9 cu x Ab] / MF / b
= [9x100x(x0.62/4)] / 1.2 / 1.0
= 212.06 kN
Set R1: Total resistance
47
0.6m diameter
bored pile
Example 1
Gk = 1000kN
Qk = 300 kN
0m
2. Compute resistance:
Assume: Pile load test carried out
with verification of SLS
Sand
k = 32
k = 19kN/m3
4m
48
Example 1
0.6m diameter
bored pile
Gk = 1000kN
Qk = 300 kN
0m
2. Compute resistance:
Sand
k = 32
k = 18kN/m3
4m
= [9 cu x Ab] / MF / b
= [9x100x(x0.62/4)] / 1.2 / 1.7
= 124.74 kN
Set R4: Total resistance
49
Example 1
0.6m diameter
bored pile
Gk = 1000kN
Qk = 300 kN
0m
Sand
k = 32
k = 19kN/m3
4m
= 27.16 + 4 = 31.16m
50
Combination 1:
A1 + M1 + R1
Combination 2:
A2 + (M1 or M2) + R4
51
Combination 1:
A1 + M1 + R1
Combination 2:
A2 + (M1 or M2) + R4
Question:
+ implies:
toCombination
be combined with.
Wouldntwhere
the use
of M2 in
2 reduce the
negative skin friction? Unconservative approach??
Combination 1: Increase loading
Combination 2: Reducing resistance
52
Symbol
Set
M1
M2
'
1.0
1.25
Effective cohesion
c'
1.0
1.25
cu
1.0
1.4
Unconfined strength
qu
1.0
1.4
53
Example 2: Downdrag
Gk = 300 kN
Soft clay
cuk = 20 kPa
Stiff clay
cuk = 50 kPa
Cuk.neg = 20 kPa
54
Example 2: Downdrag
Characteristic applied load, = V#
= 300kN.
Characteristic downdrag force, = D#
= 0.3 50 L2
= 47.1L2 kN.
55
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 1(F) - downdrag force taken as action
Partial factors for actions :
Note: Downdrag is classified as a
'permanent' action because its
Vertical load, V:
3 = 1.35
variation is always in the same
Downdrag, D:
3 = 1.35
direction (monotonic) until the
action attains a certain limit value
(EC1, 1.5.3.3).
Shaft resistance, R:
= 1.0
= V# 3 + D# 3
= 3001.35 + 94.21.35
= 532.2 kN.
56
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 1(F) - downdrag force taken as action
Design shaft resistance = R
= R # /
= 47.1 L2 / 1.0.
Require
R F .
Hence
47.1 L2 / 1.0 532.2 kN.
L2 11.29 m.
Design force for concrete shaft = F = 532.2 kN.
57
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 1(S) - settlement taken as action
Partial factors for actions:
Vertical load, V: 3 = 1.35
Any partial factor applied to settlement would have no
effect in this case.
Partial factors for resistances:
58
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 1(S) - settlement taken as action
Total design vertical load = F = V + D
= V# 3 + 94.2
= 3001.35 + 94.2
= 499.2 kN.
Design shaft resistance
=R
= R # /
= 47.1 L2 / 1.0.
59
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 1(S) - settlement taken as action
Require
R F .
Hence
47.1 L2 / 1.0 499.2 kN.
L2 10.6 m.
Design force for concrete shaft = F = 499.2 kN.
It is necessary to satisfy both Combinations 1 and 2, but
60
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 2(F) - downdrag force taken as action
Partial factors for actions:
Vertical load, V:
3 = 1.0
Downdrag, D:
3 = 1.0
Partial factors tor resistances:
Shaft resistance, R:
= 1.3
= V# 3 + D# 3
= 3001.0 + 94.21.0
= 394.2 kN.
61
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 2(F) - downdrag force taken as action
Design shaft resistance = R
= R # /
= 47.1 L2 / 1.3.
Require
R F .
Hence
47.1 L2 / 1.3 394.2 kN.
L2 10.88 m.
Design force for concrete shaft = F = 394.2 kN.
62
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 2(S) - settlement taken as action
Partial factors for actions :
Vertical load, V:
3 = 1.0
Settlement:
3 = 1.0
Partial factors for resistances:
Shaft resistance, R:
= 1.3
63
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 2(S) - settlement taken as action
EC7, 2.4.2 (11) says that a partial factor less than 1.0 must
be applied in such cases. It could be taken to be 1 / 89
from Material Table (or 1 / from Resistance Table). This
would give 1 / 1.4 = 0.714 (or 1 / 1.3 = 0.769).
Assumption that the displacement would mobilise all the
available shaft adhesion in the soft clay. The characteristic
value of this (D# ) is 94.2 kN, as shown earlier.
64
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 2(S) - settlement taken as action
D = 94.2 / ,
= 94.2 / 0.714
= 131.9 kN
Total design vertical load = F = V + D
= V# 3 + D# 3
= 3001.0 + 131.9
= 431.9 kN.
65
Example 2: Downdrag
Combination 2(S) - settlement taken as action
Design shaft resistance = R
= R # /
= 47.1 L2 / 1.3.
Require
R F .
Hence
47.1 L2 / 1.3 431.9 kN.
L2 11.92 m.
Design force for concrete shaft = F = 431.9 kN.
66
Example 2: Downdrag
Summary of results
Calculation
1(F) downdrag force taken as
action
1(S) settlement taken as action
:; (m)
11.29
<= (?)
532.2
10.60
499.2
10.88
394.2
11.92
431.9
67
pile using
the+
soil
strength,
is multiplied
where
implies:
to beDowndrag
combined with.
with the M2 partial factor.
Caution: 1:
Engineer
Combination
Increaseshould
loadingnot double factor for the
same
resistance.
Combination 2: Reducing
resistance
68
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
Ground Test
Number of profiles of tests 1
10
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.36
1.33
1.30
1.55
1.39
1.33
1.29
1.26
1.20
1.15
10
15
20
1.94
1.85
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.90
1.76
1.70
1.67
1.66
69
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
Question:
it worthwhile
pile
Number Is
of profiles
of tests to
1do more
2 static
3
4 load
5 tests?
7
10
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.36
1.33
1.30
1.55
1.39
1.33
1.29
1.26
1.20
1.15
Ground Test
10
15
20
1.94
1.85
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.90
1.76
1.70
1.67
1.66
70
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
Ground Test
Number of profiles of tests 1
10
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.36
1.33
1.30
1.55
1.39
1.33
1.29
1.26
1.20
1.15
10
15
20
1.94
1.85
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.90
1.76
1.70
1.67
1.66
71
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
Answer:
Ground TestReduction of factor from 1.55 to 1.35
Number of
profiles ofintests
1
2 bearing
3
resistance
4
5
by
7
Increase
characteristic
Factor 3 on mean value
1.55 15%.
1.47 1.42 1.38 1.36 1.33
Factor Beneficial
4 on lowest value
1.55 have
1.39 many
1.33 piles
1.29 to1.26
when you
install1.20
within the zone of similar soil profile.
10
15
20
1.94
1.85
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.90
1.76
1.70
1.67
1.66
10
1.30
1.15
72
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
Question:
1.15
1.08
10
15
20
1.94
(1.65)
1.85
(1.57)
1.83
(1.56)
1.82
(1.55)
1.81
(1.54)
1.90
(1.62)
1.76
(1.50)
1.70
(1.45)
1.67
(1.42)
1.66
(1.41)
Note:
Bracket values are values when using dynamic impact tests with signal
matching. Other notes available in NA to SS EN 1997-1:2010.
73
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
10
15
20
1.94
(1.65)
1.85
(1.57)
1.83
(1.56)
1.82
(1.55)
1.81
(1.54)
1.90
(1.62)
1.76
(1.50)
1.70
(1.45)
1.67
(1.42)
1.66
(1.41)
Note:
Bracket values are values when using dynamic impact tests with signal
matching. Other notes available in NA to SS EN 1997-1:2010.
74
1.55
1.90
(1.62)
1.76
(1.50)
1.70
(1.45)
1.67
(1.42)
1.66
(1.41)
Answer:
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
Requires a fair number
of 1.35
dynamic
test with
signal
Factor 2 on lowest Rcm
1.55
1.23
1.15
1.08
matching analysis in order to reduce value of
correlation factor.
Dynamic Impact Test
Note: Take lower of the two categories of factors.
Number of tested piles
2
5
10
15
20
Beneficial when you have many piles to install
Factor 5 on mean Rcm
1.94
1.85
1.83
1.82
1.81
within the zone
of
similar
soil
profile.
(1.65)
(1.57)
(1.56)
(1.55)
(1.54)
Note:
Bracket values are values when using dynamic impact tests with signal
matching. Other notes available in NA to SS EN 1997-1:2010.
75
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
76
Question:
Correlation
Factor,
Which
gives a more aggressive design?
Static Pile Load Test
Number of pile load tests
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
77
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
78
generally lower.
Static Pile Load Test
Number of pile load tests
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.55
1.35
1.23
1.15
1.08
79
80
Answer:
Implied FoS from EC7 lower than BS. Shorter piles are
expected? Not necessary.
Application of characteristic value onto soil parameters (i.e.
cautious estimate) may bring the design of pile using EC7
closer to BS.
81
Structural Capacity
Eurocode 2:
Partial factors for concrete and steel for ULS:
Design Situations
c for concrete
1.5
1.15
Accidential
1.2
1.0
82
Structural Capacity
Eurocode 2:
Bored piles
Arrangement of reinforcements to allow free flow of concrete.
Min. diameter for longitudinal bars not be less than 16 mm.
At least 6 longitudinal bars.
Clear distance between bars should not exceed 200 mm
measured along the periphery of the pile.
Permit ease of flow of concrete.
83
Structural Capacity
Eurocode 2:
Bored piles
Cast-in-place bored pile
cross-section, Ac
Ac 0.5 m2
As 0.5% Ac
Ac > 1.0 m2
As 0.25% Ac
84
Structural Capacity
Eurocode 2:
Concrete
Note:
Factor of 0.85 for flexure and axial loading
(NA to EC2 3.1.6)
Factor of 0.6 due to less ductile properties of
plain concrete (NA to EC2 12.3.1)
fcd = fck / c
= 0.85 fck / 1.5 [driven]
= 0.85 fck / (1.5 x 1.1) [bored-reinforced]
= 0.60 fck / (1.5 x 1.1) [bored-unreinforced)]
Steel
fyd = fyk / s
= fyk / 1.15
Structural capacity of pile > Design Action/Load
Q = fcd Ac + fyd As
>
Fd = G Gk + Q Qk
= 0.515 fck Ac + 0.87 fyk As [bored-reinforced]
= 0.364 fck Ac [bored-unreinforced]
85
Structural Capacity
Eurocode 2:
Concrete
fcd = fck / c
= 0.85 fck / 1.5 [driven]
= 0.85 fck / (1.5 x 1.1)
[bored-reinforced]
BS 8004
and SS CP4:
=Q0.60
fck / (1.5
x c1.1)
[bored-unreinforced)]
= (0.4
fcu A
+ 0.75
fy As)/FoS [bored-reinforced]
SS CP65:
Steel
fyd = fyk / s Q = 0.25 fcu Ac [bored-unreinforced]
Note: fcu fck & fy fyk
= fyk / 1.15
Structural capacity of pile > Design Action/Load
Q = fcd Ac + fyd As
>
Fd = G Gk + Q Qk
= 0.515 fck Ac + 0.87 fyk As [bored-reinforced]
= 0.364 fck Ac [bored-unreinforced]
86
Structural Capacity
Eurocode 2:
Table 3.1 Strength characteristics for concrete
87
Structural Capacity
Eurocode 2:
Table 3.1 Strength characteristics for concrete
88
Structural Capacity
Hence,
Bored - reinforced section:
Q = fcd Ac + fyd As
= 0.515 fck Ac + 0.87 fyk As
0.412 fck,cube Ac + 0.87 fyk As
Bored - unreinforced section:
Q = fcd Ac
= 0.364 fck Ac
0.291 fck,cube Ac
Note: In CP4 and CP65,
Q = (0.4 fcu Ac + 0.75 fy As)/FoS [bored-reinforced]
Q = 0.25 fcu Ac
[bored-unreinforced]
89
THANK YOU