Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AiDA COLMA
Universidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de Miranda
Coro, Venezuela
LAURA PLA*
Escuela de Postgrado
Facultad de Agronomia, UCV
Maracay, Venezuela
area, located in northwestern Venezuela, comprises an ecologically diverse region, due both to its varied geomorphology
and to its history of human occupation. A landscape approach
was used. Qn the basis of photointerpretation, examination of
existing literature, and field work, uniform land units (physiognomic units) were delineated and described in terms of landform, soil, vegetation, drainage pattern, and climate. These
were grouped in homogeneous units (HU) on the basis of their
potential natural vegetation through the delimitation of climax
complexes. The last hierarchy, the land systems, comprise the
geomorphogenetically related HU. The results are presented
at different levels of generalization and integration, in verbal
and cartographic descriptions, and they are stored in standardized formats to ensure ease of comprehension and handling and to meet different needs. This report describes the
methods employed for the survey and data presentation, and
discusses its applicability and limitations.
232
70=009
........
" ~
'~' / ,,'P~AGUA,*'/
,,._..,,_.~---~.
E'S'E22R,.,ME.
"
I.,,.#//A////!, //: /
KM
~
.
SEMIARID ZONE
Geologyand Geomorphology
Most of Falc6n's territory is underlain by Tertiary
sediments, which outcrop in the uplands. Several episodes of continental and marine deposition in the geosyncline, which occupied most of the study area, produced
interbedded shales and sandstones, with layers of conglomerate and limestone. Falc6n Ranges started uplifting
in the Lower Miocene, and tectonic mo~,ements continued up to the end of the Pliocene. The lowlands are
overlain by Quaternary deposits.
The Coastal Plains Province comprises the Paraguana
Peninsula, the isthmus, and the alluvial plains to the west
of these. Relief is low and even. The highest elevation
corresponds to an isolated hill (815 m) in the peninsula.
The shore, subjected to the trade winds from the ENE, is
overlain by recent sand deposits, in segments of beaches or
of dunes. The rivers, which traverse the plain s from south
Table 1.
233
Field questionnaire, a
Date:
Aerial photo no.:
Cartographic sheet no.:
A) Physical environment
Slope:
Erosion:
Microtopography:
Rockiness class:
Type of fragments:
Land use
type:
degree:
Altitude:
Soil texture:
Landform:
External drainage:
Stoniness class:
Soil color:
Water sources:
Litter coverage: %
B) Vegetation structure
Growth form
C) Flora
Species
Periodicity
Spatial pattern
Leaf
Texture Size Shape
Phenological stage
Thorniness
Growth form
aEach of the four parts (data on location; physical environmental attributes; vegetation structure, flora) goes on a separate sheet. The ranks and
classes for the physical parameters are shown in Table 2. Growth-form cover is assessed according to Fosberg's scale (Fosberg 1967); for spedes
cover the Braun-Blanquet scale was modified to include the intermediate classes 6%-15% and 16%-25% cover. 2, = average growth-form height;
xmax and xmin refer to maximum and minimum heights of the green mass.
234
Table 2.
A~itude(m)
3
1
3 4"x~-."5
3 2,s
4
=H
0-50
51-100
101-200
201-400
401-800
801-1600
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Landform = R
Plain
Valley
Hill
Monocline
ES
Type of fragments = F
EE
None
Up to 7.5 cm diameter
7.5 to 25 cm diameter
Larger than 25 cm diameter
1+2
3+2
1+2+3
EC
Stoniness = P
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Microtopography = M
Rockiness = A
No rock outcrops
Outcrops cover 2%-10% of the surface
Outcrops cover 10%-25% of the surface
Outcrops cover 25%-50% of the surface
Outcrops cover 50%-90% of the surface
A rock outcrop
Even
Dunes
Undulating
Gullied
Mounds
0
1
2
3
4
5
Erosion
1
2
3
4
Runoff = D
0
1
2
3
Medium
Slow
Rapid
Very slow
Ponded
Very rapid
1
2
3
4
5
Slope (%) = S
0
1
2
3
4
5
0-2
2-6
6-13
13-25
25-55
>55
1
2
3
4
5
6
,~
'
FALCON
235
STATE, VENEZUELA
=m====
~0 20 30
No photocoverage available
10 0
236
P.U.N~ 144
Name: Alto de Mujica
District: Z a m o r a
Location: 11~ , N - 6 9 ~
Area: 90.63 km 2
No. of UFIs: 1
Altitude: 200 m
Accessibility: easy
'W
lOO
f
8o
3C
L"-:
G
20
.20
10-
'"~' M k
M .; ']
~ 6
N 6
Bulnesia arborea
Land use: pastoralism (goats raising without management practises),
firewood gathering
Degree of land use: slightly transformed
Table 3.
237
Landform
Soils
Vegetation
Land use
Xa
Undulating plains
Fine-textured saline s o i l s
pterota, Machaerium
spp., Eugenia spp.
Xb
Low hills
Subsistence farming
Human population is concentrated along the main road, which traverses the system in the E-W direction; human density is
less than 0.1 person/ha; physiographic units: 141,149, 148, 162, 163, I64; I65, 167-P, 200, 20I-P
Results
The hierarchical classification produced 269 physiognomie units, grouped in 38 homogeneous units and 15
systems. The physiognomic units are mapped at 1/
250,000 scale, and identified by numbers and the name of
a settlement within it. The homogeneous units and the
systems are mapped at a 1/1,000,000 scale. The latter
are named after their geographical position and identified by a roman number, and the former are identified by
the system's roman number followed by a letter.
In order that the information can meet different needs,
it is presented at various levels of integration and generalization. Thematic maps and reports are presented for
238
Table 4.
System
and
area
Geology
2260 km 2
Interbedded
sandstone and
shale, Miocene to Pliocene
Same as I
Interbedded
sandstone and
shale Miocene to Pliocene
Same as V
II
550 km 2
III
1130 km 2
IV
1360 km z
V
1440 km 2
VI
1300 km 2
VII
4230 km 2
VIII
1070 km 2
IX
590 km 2
Tertiary gypsipherous
shales
Landform
drainage
pattern
Major soils
Medium textured, locally
clayey and
saline. Camborthids, Torriorthents,
Pateargids,
Haplargids
Shallow, stony,
saline. Orthents, Orthids, Argids
Major
vegetation
type
From thorn
woodland to
deciduous
seasonal forest in a N - S
gradient
Altitude
and
slope
0-160 m
0%-4%
Present
land use
Goat herding on
natural vegetation to the
N; cattle on
seeded pasture to the S
Thorn scrub
and thorn
woodland
0-160 m
0%-6%
Medium
textured
Orthents,
Orthids,
Camborthids,
Salorthids,
Haplargids,
Psamments
Shallow lithic
soils, rock
outcrops. Orthents, Orthids, Argids,
Camborthids
Shallow, lithie
on eroded
slopes; organic on the
summits; reddish brown
elsewhere.
Orthents, Orthids, Argids,
Tropepts, Ustalfs
Same as V
Thorn woodland
0-100 m
0%-4%
Horticultural
crops under
irrigation
Thorn woodland
160-500 m
0%-25%
Goat herding on
natural vegetation, subsistencefarming
200-800 m
6%-13%
Cattle raising,
subsistence
farming
200-800 m
15%-55%
Same as V,
small undulating upland
plains
Same as V;
limestone outcrops, same as
V and Rendolls, Ustolls
400-1200 m
2%-40%
Cattle raising to
the W; goat
herding on
rangelands
Cattle raising,
subsistence
farming;
sugarcane
Mountains and
hills; complex
slopes
Mountains, bordered by low
foothills; radial and trellis drainage
Same as VII
Same as V
300-1500 m
15%-55%
Subsistence
~rming
Shallow lithic
soils with
rock outcrops;
red clayey.
Orthents,
Tropepts, Ustalfs, Ustults,
Orthids, Usterts
160-800 m
Cattle raising
Same as I, sand
dunes to tlae
coast
6%-25%
239
Table 4.
Continued.
System
and
area
X
1190 km2
XI
1310 km 2
Geology
Landform
drainage
pattern
Undulating
plains with
scattered low
hills; radial
and pinnate
drainage
XII
3240 km z
Same as XI
xIiI
1470 kmz
XIV
680 km 2
Quaternary deposits
XV
2530 km z
Major soils
Fine textured,
saline,
patches of
reddish soils.
Orthents,
Tropepts, Ustalfs, Ustults,
Camborthids,
Chromustens, Torriorthents
Same as X and
Ustifluvents,
Argids, Orthids, Usterts,
Ustolls
Same as X
Shallow, lithic
or fine textured overlain
by salt deposits in dried
water courses.
Orthents, Orthids, Argids
Medium to fine
textured. Orthents, O r thids, Argids
Very heterogenous, medium
to fine textured. Torriorthents,
Torripsamments, Camborthids, Aquents, Zorrerts, Orthids,
Orthents
Major
vegetation
type
Pasture, patches
of deciduous
seasonal for-
Altitude
and
slope
Present
land use
20-500 m
2%-25%
Cattle raising,
subsistance
farming
0-160
0%-1%
Cattle raising
est
Same as X,
Thorn scrub
and thorn
woodland
80-300 m
0.1%- 16%
Cattle raising,
permanent
crops (coconut)
80-200 m
2%-6%
Goat herding on
natural vegeration
375-600 m
6%- 13%
Cattle raising,
goat herding
on natural regetation
Goat herding on
natural vegetation, subsistence farming, annual
crops
0-100 m
(830 m)
0%-1%
major environmental factors: climate, geology and geomorphology, vegetation, soils, and hydrology.
Each physiognomic unit is described on a standardized format or ecogram, as shown in F i g u r e 3. T h e
polygonal figure shows the physical nature of the habitat,
and was constructed in the fashion of the Lutz phytographs (Shimwell 1971). Each axis represents a physical
parameter. T h e parameters were r a n k e d in such a way
that the higher the value, the more limiting was the
condition. T h e lowest value for each p a r a m e t e r lies on
240
700009
",,
-"
69~ '
69000,
68~
t
71000 ,
I
11o30,
70~30'
Villa
110009
KM
1'0 0 10 20 30
Figure 4. Land systems and homogeneous units (HU) in Falc6n State. Land systems are indicated with roman numbers and HUs
with letters:/, Planicie Aluvial Occidental; II, Sureo de Urumaco; III, Planicie Aluvial Mitare-Seeo; IV, Piedemonte Costero; V,
Serran[a Bariro-Pedregal; 111, Alineaci6n Central Occidental; VII, Alineaci6n Meridional; VIII, Serranla de San Luis; IX,
Alineaci6n Central Oriental; X, Alineaei6n Septentrional Oriental; XI, Cuenea del Hueque; XII, Valles Mar~timos; XIII, Sistema
de Depresiones; )(IV, Valles Intermontanos; XV, Peninsula de Paraguan~.
the perimeter, and the values increase centripetally.
Thus, the polygon shape and size give a visual indication
of the physical condition of the land. The climatic
diagram follows Gaussen's design (Walter and others
1975); it corresponds to the station in the unit or to the
nearest station in a similar topographic position. Vegetation structure is shown in a layer diagram.
In a final report, a general description of each system
is given, as shown in the example of Table 3. Ground
photographs and stereograms are added to illustrate
major features. The distribution of the systems and
homogeneous units is presented in the map (Figure 4). A
summary of the main characteristics of the 15 land
systems is given in Table 4.
Discussion
Land surveys endeavour to divide a region into comprehensive units. If the task is carried out on the basis of
sound ecological principles, the classification approaches
a natural system with standardized attributes. Hence, the
1968).
In this survey, scant regard was given to the human
factor. Following FAO's recommendation (FAO 1976)
and in view of the extension and complexity of the area,
the social analysis was left for a future stage in the survey
of selected zones. The results of the survey allow for the
choice of promising sites and resources on the basis of the
physical and biotic characteristics only. The final decision requires consideration of the cultural and economic
components of the system.
Acknowledgments
The research reported herein was supported by the
Research and Development Convention (National
241
Research Council, Venezuelan Science Research Institute, University Institute of Technology of Coro, Central
University of Venezuela, National University Francisco
de Miranda). The preparation of the manuscript was
financed by the National Research Council of Venezuela.
Literature Cited
Beckett, P. H. T., R. Webster, O. M. McNeil and C. W.
Mitchell. 1972. Terrain evaluation by means of a data bank.
Geographical Journal 138:430-456.
Christian, C. S. 1952. Regional land surveys. Journal of the
Australian Institute of Agricultural Sciences 18:140-146.
Christian, C. S. 1958. The concepts of land units and land
systems. Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Science Congress
20:74-81.
Christian, C. S., and G. A. Stewart. 1953. General report on
survey of Katherine-Darwin Region, 1946. CSIRO Australian Land Research Series, no. 1.
Christian, C. S., and G. A. Stewart. 1968. Methodology of
integrated surveys. Pages 233-280 in Aerial surveys and
integrated studies. Proceedings of the Toulouse Conference.
UNESCO, Paris.
Cooke, R. U. 1977. Applied geomorphological studies in
deserts: a review of examples. Pages 183-225 in J. R. Hails
(ed.), Applied geomorphology. Elsevier, New York.
COPLANARH. 1975. Inventario Nacional de Tierras. MiniSterio de Agricultura y Cr~a, Caracas, Venezuela.
FAO. 1976. Cadre pour l'&aluation des sols. Bulletin Pedologique no. 32. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture, Rome.
Fosberg, F. R. 1967. Classification of vegetation for general
purposes. Pages 73-120 in G. F. Peterken (ed.), Guide to
check sheet for IBP areas. IBP handbook no. 4. Blackwell,
Oxford.
Jurdant, M., V. Gerardin, and L. J. B~lair. 1974. Ecological
land survey, the biophysical basis of land-use planning.
Pages 140-143 in Structure, function and management of
ecosystems. Proceedings of the First International Congress
of Ecology, The Hague, 1974. Centre for Agricultural
Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lahey, J. F. 1973. On the origin of the dry climate in northern
South America and the southern Caribbean. Pp. 75-90 in
D . H. K. Amiran and A. W. Wilson (eds.), Coastal deserts:
their natural and human environments. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Mabbutt, J. A. 1968. Review of concepts of land evaluation.
pages 11-28 in G. A. Stewart (ed.), Land evaluation.
Macmillan, Victoria, Australia.
Mueller-Dombois, D., and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and
methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New
York.
Satyanarayan, Y., and V. V. Dhruvanarayan. 1968. Use of
aerial photographs in surveying ground water and vegetation
resources in the arid zone of India. pages 505-508 in Aerial
242