You are on page 1of 4

EDUC 760: E-Portfolio Rubric

Please complete and submit this e-portfolio self-assessment.This information will be sent to your instructor.
* Required
First Name

Last Name

URL of your eportfolio *


Copy and paste the web address into the box below. (Be accurate!)

Artifacts in Your E-Portfolio


A professional biography (This is usually placed on the homepage of your e-portfolio as a personal introduction.)
Here's where you use the biography you began at the beginning of our class.
Contact information: Name, university or personal email address. LinkedIn Profile (optional).
Links or screen shot for the discussion prompt you facilitated in Moodle. (Module 3)
Links or screen shot for your quiz and/or survey. (Module 4)
Link or embed of your closed captioned video (Module 5)
Link or embed of your Scoop.it Magazine. (Module 6)
Reflective Letter (Module 8.)
Optional: Your resume (If you include a resume, it's best to provide both an online version and a pdf or word version
that can be downloaded.)
Optional: Links to favorite resources that show your professional interests (websites, blogs, wikis etc).
Reflective Commentary *
Each artifact should include reflective commentary that demonstrates your understanding of e-learning and online
teaching. Do more than just describe the artifact. Explain how and why you would use the artifact as an online
instructor.
Exemplary: All reflections clearly explains how the artifact demonstrates your understanding of e-learning and
online teaching.
Proficient: Most of the reflections clearly explains how the artifact demonstrates your understanding of e-learning
and online teaching.
Developing: A few of the reflections clearly explains how the artifact demonstrates your understanding of e-learning
and online teaching.
Unsatisfactory: There are no reflections. Or those that exist do not explain how the artifact demonstrates your
understanding of e-learning and online teaching.
Descriptive Text *
Descriptive text provides a clear and concise description of the artifact. This also means including your name, date,

and course number on any downloadable files you make avaiable on your website.
Exemplary: All artifacts have a clear and concise description. All artifacts have a title, author, and date.
Proficient: Most artifacts have a clear and concise description. Most artifacts have a title, author, and date.
Developing: Some artifacts have a clear and concise description. Some artifacts have a title, author, and date.
Unsatisfactory: None of the artifacts artifacts have a clear and concise description. No artifacts have a title, author,
date .
Citation shows understanding of copyright and fair use *
Demonstrate that you are following copyright and fair use guidelines by citing any elements created by others.
Electronically generated citations are acceptible. Use APA or MLA formatting. (You are not expected to formally cite
work you created yourself. )
Exemplary: All images, media or text elements created by others are cited with accurate, properly formatted
citations.
Proficient: Most images, media or text elements created by others are cited with accurate, properly formatted
citations.
Developing: Some images, media or text elements created by others are cited with accurate, properly formatted
citations.
Unsatisfactory: No images, media or text elements created by others are cited with accurate, properly formatted
citations.

Usability and Accessibility


This section is about how effectively your eportfolio can be read and navigated by your readers.
Ease of Navigation *
This element speaks to the usability of your eportfolio. Will your reader be able to navigate your work without being
lost or distracted?
Exemplary: The navigation links are intuitive. The various parts of the portfolio are labeled, clearly organized and
allow the reader to easily locate an artifact and move to related pages or a different section. All pages connect to a
navigation menu, and all external links connect to the appropriate website or file.
Proficient: The navigation links generally function well, but it is not always clear how to locate an artifact or move to
related pages or different section. Most of the pages connect to the navigation menu. Most of the external links
connect to the appropriate website or file.
Developing: The navigation links are somewhat confusing, and it is often unclear how to locate an artifact or move
to related pages or a different section.Some of the pages connect to the navigation menu, but in other places the links
do not connect to preceding pages or to the navigation menu. Some of the external links do not connect to the
appropriate website or file.
Unsatisfactory: The navigation links are confusing, and it is difficult to locate artifacts and move to related pages or
a different section. There are significant problems with pages connecting to preceding pages or the navigation menu.
Many of the external links do not connect to the appropriate website or file.
Text Elements and Layout *
This element combines both accessibility and usability. Ease of reading depends on many text elements as described
below.
Exemplary: The eportfolio is easy to read. Fonts and type size vary appropriately for headings, sub-headings and
text. Use of headings, sub-headings and paragraphs promotes easy scanning. Use of font styles (italic, bold, underline)
is consistent and improves readability. Horizontal and vertical white space alignment are used appropriately to organize
content..
Proficient: The eportfolio is generally easy to read. Fonts and type size vary appropriately for headings, subheadings and text. In general, use of headings, sub-headings and paragraphs promotes easy scanning.Use of font
styles (italic, bold, underline) is generally consistent. Horizontal and vertical white space alignment are generally used
appropriately to organize content.
Developing: The eportfolio is often difficult to read due to inappropriate use of fonts and type size for headings, subheadings, text or long paragraphs. Inconsistent use of font styles (italic, bold, underline) distracts the reader. Some

formatting tools are under or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content. Horizontal and vertical
white space alignment are sometimes used inappropriately to organize content.
Unsatisfactory: The eportfolio is difficult to read due to inappropriate use of fonts, type size for headings, subheadings and text and font styles (italic, bold, underline). Lack of paragraphing impedes scanning. Many formatting
tools are under or over-utilized and decrease the reader accessibility to the content. Horizontal and vertical white
space alignment are used inappropriately, and the content appears disorganized and cluttered.
Color *
Colors and contrast are another aspect of usability and accessibility. (Keep in mind that some of your readers will be
color blind. )
Exemplary: Color of background, fonts, and links enhance the readability and aesthetic quality, and are used
consistently throughout the eportfolio.
Proficient: Color of background, fonts, and links generally enhance the readability of the text, and are generally
used consistently throughout the eportfolio.
Developing: Color of background, fonts, and links decrease the readability of the text, are distracting and used
inconsistently in some places throughout the eportfolio.
Unsatisfactory: Color of background, fonts, and links decrease the readability of the text, are distracting and used
inconsistently throughout the eportfolio.
Writing Conventions *
Be sure to proofread, spell check, proofread again. Consider using a text to speech system to listen for writing
convention problems. Seek peer feedback. Ask someone to read through your work.
Exemplary: There are no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Proficient: There are a few errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. These require minor editing
and revision.
Developing: There are 4 or more errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling requiring editing and
revision.
Unsatisfactory: There are more than 6 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling requiring major
editing and revision.

Audio Visual Elements


The only required AV artifact for EDUC 760 is your Closed Caption project.
However, you may choose to add images, as well as audio and video files to your e-portfolio. The following criteria will
help you judge your AV work.
Use of Multimedia
Consider the meaning that multimedia conveys to your audience.
Exemplary: All of the photographs, concept maps, spreadsheets, graphics, audio and/or video files enhance
understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships, create interest, and are appropriate for the chosen purpose.
Accessibility requirements using alternate text for graphics are included in web-based portfolios.
Proficient: Most of the graphic elements and multimedia contribute to understanding concepts, ideas and
relationships, enhance the written material and create interest.
Developing: Some of the graphic elements and multimedia do not contribute to understanding concepts, ideas and
relationships. Some of the graphics include alternate text in web-based portfolios.
Unsatisfactory: None of the graphic elements or multimedia contribute to understanding concepts, ideas and
relationships. The inappropriate use of multimedia detracts from the content. None of the graphics include alternate text
in web-based portfolios.
AV Quality
Exemplary: All audio / video files are edited with proper voice projection, appropriate language, and clear delivery
and closed captions.

Proficient: Most of the audio / video files are edited with proper voice projection, appropriate language, and clear
delivery and closed captions.
Developing: A few of the audio / video files are edited with inconsistent clarity or sound (too loud/too soft/garbled),
no closed captions.
Unsatisfactory: Audio / video files are not edited or exhibit inconsistent clarity or sound (too loud/too soft/garbled) no
closed captions.
Your Comments
Add any additional information about any element of your eportfolio you want your instructor to know.

This rubric is based on original work by Joan Vandervelde.


Vandervelde, J. (2011) EPortfolio (Digital Portfolio) Rubric . Retrieved from
http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/eportfoliorubric.html

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.


Powered by

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.


Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms

You might also like