Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date:
Docket:
Registry:
20150720
08-14-410-1; 08-14-560; 08-14-604
Iqaluit
Crown:
Accused:
Guy Uniuqsaraq
________________________________________________________________________
Before:
Counsel (Crown):
Counsel (Accused):
Caroline Lirette
Patrick Bruce
Location Heard:
Date Heard:
Matters:
Iqaluit, Nunavut
May 26, 2015; June 18, 2015
Criminal Code, s. 266; s. 268; Controlled Drugs and
Substances Act, SC 1996, c 19, s. 4(1)
I. INTRODUCTION
[1]
II. FACTS
[2]
[3]
The bleeding in the brain was monitored and resolved itself without
the necessity of surgery. Fortunately, the victim does not have any
permanent injuries.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[8]
IV. ANALYSIS
[14] The sentencing principles which I must consider are set out in s. 718
of the Criminal Code of Canada, RSC 1985, c C-46 [Criminal Code]. They
are:
to denounce unlawful conduct
to deter the offender and others from similar
behaviour
if necessary, to separate the offender from society
to rehabilitate the offender
to provide reparations to victims of crime
to promote a sense of responsibility in an offender
[15] Counsel have provided case law from the Northwest Territories which
suggests that the appropriate range of sentence is 2 1/5 to 5 years.
A review of the NWT cases suggests that this proposition is based on
the case of R v Morgan, 2007 NWTSC 30, 74 WCB (2d) 836, wherein
the court, after reviewing a number of cases from that jurisdiction,
commented that the general range was 30 months to five years. The
court also recognized that the facts that support a conviction for
aggravated assault and the types of offenders who come before the
court to be sentenced for aggravated assault vary greatly.
[16] In the recent case of R v Akalukjuak, 2015 NUCJ 18, 2015 NUCJ 18
(CanLII) [Akalukjuak], this court reviewed some of the cases from this
jurisdiction where sentences were imposed for aggravated assault.
The cases reviewed ranged from a conditional sentence to 39
months. There is also the case of R v Kopalie, NUCJ Case File #0811-522-1 [Kopalie], a case described by the presiding judge as a
murder without a dead body where the offender was sentenced to
five years in custody.
[17] I make these comments simply to highlight that sentencing is a highly
individualized process. As stated in Akalukjuak, parity requires
consistency in analysis and approach, but does not necessarily
require that all persons convicted of the same offence receive the
same sentence.
[26] It is well known that many inmates from BCC had to be transferred to
British Columbia because the conditions at BCC had become
intolerable. The Office of the Federal Correctional Investigator
released a report in April of 20131 which found that the conditions
were deplorable and some aspects of the institution constituted
human rights violations. This report was followed by the March, 2015
report of the Auditor General of Canada on Corrections in Nunavut2. I
do not intend to discuss these reports in detail. Suffice to say that the
findings highlight not only the inadequacies of the physical structure of
BCC, in particular the extreme overcrowding and lack of sufficient
facilities for personal hygiene, but also the lack of programming,
resources, and planning to facilitate an offender's successful
reintegration to the community upon release.
[27] The fact is, most of those who find themselves at BCC are without the
necessary coping mechanisms to deal with the stress and difficulties
of everyday life. Many have cognitive impairment, mental health, and
substance abuse issues. They have difficulty controlling impulses.
Simply getting through the day without incident can be a struggle for
them. It is not realistic to take this segment of the citizenry, put them
in a confined and crowded living situation, without any supports to
assist them with their issues, and expect them to function without
incident.
[28] Mr. Uniuqsaraq spoke to this better than I can. He spoke eloquently
about his time at BCC and his time in British Columbia. He spoke
about how having a cell to himself calmed him down and allowed him
to think. He sought out counselling with the prison Chaplain and
established a supportive relationship with him. He completed two
levels of programming on how to establish healthy relationships.
Perhaps the impact of this change in his remand conditions is best
illustrated by his disciplinary record, which showed numerous
incidents while in BCC and no incidents while in British Columbia.
[29] I am granting Mr. Uniuqsaraq enhanced credit at a rate of 1:1.5 for the
period from August 4 to October 31, 2014, and credit at a rate of 1:1
for the period from October 31 to today.
V. CONCLUSION
[30] The sentence is as follows:
Aggravated assault of
August 4, 2014
15 months
Six months
consecutive
Simple possession of
November 27, 2014
TOTAL
Four months
consecutive
25 months @ 30
days/month = 750
days
88 days x 1.5 =
132
509 days
A. Ancillary orders
[31] There will be a mandatory DNA order, a mandatory Criminal Code s.
109 firearms prohibition for ten years, and a mandatory Victim of
Crimes Surcharge of $200 on the aggravated assault, and $100 each
on the remaining two charges.
___________________
Justice S. Cooper
Nunavut Court of Justice