You are on page 1of 8

Examining the effects of online advertising on

consumer attitudes and brand preferences


toward mobile phones industry.

Introduction and literature review


16 March 2015

Lecturer: Dr. Sabrina Thornton


Student name: Mai T.T. Dao- u1473572

I.

Introduction:

Nowadays, mobile phones have become very important to people all over the world. In
other words, mobile phones have today become a necessity in life and are treated as a
vital instrument carried by individuals, allowing them to be kept informed and connected
with the rest of the world. It is an opportunity to stay in touch with friends and family
members, where having access to emails and business associates, are just a few of
reasons for increased in importance of mobile phones. The belief is that mobile phone
has a manifest destiny to subsume everything else. According to Bridges, Rempel and
Griggs (2010), the worldwide penetration rates for mobile phones usage have gone up
from five percent ten years ago, to an estimated 61 percent in 2008. The more advance
in technology of the mobile phones, the higher the rank the user is seen in the eyes of
other people. Nowadays, mobile phones are quite affordable and easy to use leading to
an increase in the number of mobile phone providers with companies designing and
developing their very own platforms and operating systems.
Meanwhile, advertisement is considered the lifeline of any company that wants to
market their product. It persuades or influences an audience to buy their product,
enabling the company to increase sales and profit (Wells, et al, 2003, Richards and
Curran, 2002). Moreover, with the advent of the Internet and its growing importance as
a place to do business, online advertising has become a topic of increasing interest to
academic research (Ha, 2008; Kim and McMillan, 2008). In the past decade, Internet
advertising has grown beyond simple banner advertising to include new advertising
models and online channels (e.g., advertising through search engines and price

comparison Web site advertising) that make better use of the Internet's unique potential
for interaction between consumer and advertiser (Rappaport 2007).
Until now, attitudes toward websites have been considered important indicators in
measuring the effectiveness of advertisements (Rodgers & Thorson, 2000). However,
research on the effectiveness of the online advertising channels is still rare. Therefore,
the purpose of this study is to investigate consumers attitudes towards mobile products
online advertising. Apparently, hosts of studies have suggested that individuals attitude
is an important measure of advertising effectiveness (Haley, Staffaronie and Fox, 1994,
Russell et al., 1994, Ducoffe, 1996). At that point, in practical standpoint, the research
will be relevant to advertisers as the consumers attitude might affect to not only their
brand preferences and purchasing intension but also the level of brand loyalty,
therefore, a deep understanding in the field is vital for the marketers. Plus, the study will
enable businesses and organizations to use online advertising more effectively and
efficiently in their global marketing efforts. For example, a better understanding of the
relationship between attitudes toward online advertising and consumers response
behavior will facilitate businesses to evaluate their online marketing programs more
accurately.
II.

Literature review:

Studies on attitudes toward advertising generally fall into two avenues. Firstly,
investigate the impact of consumers attitudes and then, belief, toward advertising
effectiveness (MacKenzie et al., 1986; Muehling, 1987). Regarding to the later, scholars
examine how consumer attitudes towards online advertising influence their brand
preferences and then, purchase intention (Gong and Maddox, 2003).

Consumers attitude towards Internet advertising


Attitude is an important driver of behavioral change (Kimelfeld & Watt, 2001); perception
of advertisements directly affects the consumers attitudes toward brands and then
purchase intention (Suh & Yi, 2006). Mackenzie and Lutz (1989) defined the attitude
toward an advertisement as being the response elicited in a consumer; Lutz (1985)
believed the attitude toward an advertisement is in itself an expression of personal
preference towards a product. Ajzen and Fishbein (1980), and Mitchell and Olson
(1981) noted that the attitude toward an advertisement affects consumers perceptions
of brands, and determines whether a purchase is made. This opinion has been held by
many scholars (Brown & Stayman, 1992; Gorn, 1982; Homer, 1990; MacKenzie & Lutz,
1989; MacKenzie, Lutz, & Belch, 1986; Moore & Hutchinson, 1983). Therefore, the
following hypothesis is proposed:
H1: The more positive a consumers attitude toward an advertisement is, the greater the
effect of the advertisement?
Consumer belief
It is argued that consumer behavior such as advertisement avoidance may be a result
of consumers general negative attitudes toward advertising (Li et al., 2002). In addition,
Wolin et al. (2002) show that several belief factors influenced web users attitudes which
in turn had an impact on users behavioral intention. In specific, past research suggests
consumers beliefs about online advertising are positively associated with their
attidudes. Accordingly, the hypotheses as following:
H2: Positive beliefs about online advertising will have a positive influence on their
attitudes towards online advertising.

H3: Negative beliefs about online advertising will have a negative influence on their
attitudes towards online advertising.
Consumer attitudes and consumer response to online advertising
Lavidge and Steiner (1961) effect suggested that ones belief is a precursor of attitude,
which by default is an antecedent of behavior. Past research has supported that beliefs
and attitudes are precursors of consumers response toward online advertising, and
ltimately their purchase intention. Mehta (2000), for example, examined the relationship
between attitudes toward advertising in general and consumer responses in terms of
brand recall and buying intention. The researcher found that attitudes toward advertising
in

general

influenced

attitudes

toward

specific

advertisement. Furthermore,

consumers with a more favorable attitude towards advertising were more likely to recall
the brand and be persuaded by advertising. At that point, it turns out that attitudes
consumer brand preference have the relationship towards online advertising. Hence,
the hypothesis is suggested:
H4: What is the relationship between attitudes and consumers responses to online
advertising?

References
1. Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of
Advertising Research, 36(5), 21-35.

2. Haley, R. I., Staffaronie, J., & Fox, A. (1994). The missing measures of copy testing.
Journal of Advertising Research, 34(3), 46-60.

3. Newman, E. J., Stem, D. E., & Sprott, D. E. (2004). Banner advertisement and web
site congruity effects on consumer web site perceptions. Industrial Management & Data
Systems, 104(3), 273-281. doi:10.1108/02635570410525816

4. Allport, G.W. (1935). Attitudes. A handbook of Social Psychology. Murchinon, C.A.


(ED).798-844.

5. Goldsmith, R.E. and Lafferty, B.A. (2002). Consumer response to web sites and their
influence on advertising effectiveness, Internet Research: Electronic Networking
Applications and Policy, 12(4), 31828

6. Becerra, E. P., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (2011). Effects of trust beliefs on consumers'


online

intentions.

European

doi:10.1108/03090561111119921

Journal

of

Marketing,

45(6),

936-962.

7. Wang, Y., Sun, S., Lei, W., & Toncar, M. (2009). Examining beliefs and attitudes
toward online advertising among chinese consumers. Direct Marketing: An International
Journal, 3(1), 52-66. doi:10.1108/17505930910945732

8. Punniyamoorthy, M., & Mohan Raj, M. P. (2007). An empirical model for brand loyalty
measurement. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 15(4),
222-233. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jt.5750044
9. Tellis GJ .(1988). The price elasticity of selective demand: A meta analysis of
econometric models of sales. J. of Mkt Res. 25(4) pp: 331-341.

10. Raj, S. P. (1982). The effects of advertising on high and low loyalty consumer
segments. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 77-89. doi:10.1086/208898

11. Wang, Y., & Sun, S. (2010). Assessing beliefs, attitudes, and behavioral responses
toward online advertising in three countries. International Business Review, 19(4),
333-344. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.01.004
12. Bridges L, Rempel H. G, Griggs K., (2010),"Making the case for a fully mobile library
web site: from floor maps to the catalog", Reference Services Review, Vol. 38 Iss: 2
pp. 309 320
13. Kwok K. T. (2007), Effect of Brand Image on Consumer Purchasing Behaviour on
Clothing: Comparison between China and the UKs Consumers, MSc International
Business, pp. 96
14. Lazarova R. (2010), Consumers Perception of Food Quality and Its Relation to the
Choice of Food, Master of Science in Marketing, Department of Marketing And
Statistics, Aarhus Universitet, pp. 86

15. Kurgman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without


involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349356.
16. Homer, P. M. (1990). The mediating role of attitude toward the ad: Some additional
evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 7886. IAB, 1997. Metrics and
methodology by the media measurement task force. September 1997. Available at
/http://www.iab.net/advertise/ content/mmtf3.html#0S.
17. Leong, S. M., Ang, S. H., & Tham, L. L. (1996). Increasing brand name recall in print
advertising among Asian consumers. Journal of Advertising, 25(2), 6582.
18. Lutz, J. R. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A
conceptual framework. In L. F.
19. Alwitt, & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects (pp.
4563). New York: Erlbaum.
20. Macias, W. (2003). A beginning look at the effects of interactivity, product
involvement and web experience on comprehension: Brand web sites as interactive
advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 25(2), 3144.

You might also like