Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
DikMenjur (Wardiman,1998) have identify 12 mistakes on study activity in vocational
school, in this case, it is focus to the teacher, like vocational education basic
practical didnt convey braced on the basic principle; student al wed to work with
that wrong way; reckless; didnt apply the complete study system ; didnt obey the
safety work stand art, the teacher teach with write on he booed system, tee teacher
didnt active guide and watch the student when they work ; teaching proceeds
that
showed
didnt
have
economical
understanding
added
built
up
other
(3) communication, (4) Not a destination process, (5) integrative; and (6)
Reflection.
c. Psychomotoric Education
Simpson (Granland, 1978) have set up a psychomotoric aspect like (1)
Perception ; (2) Set, (3) Guide response ; (4) Mechanism ; (5) complex over
response; (6) Adaptation; (7) Origination.
CBE/T characteristic
Dubois (1993) said that CBE/T should contains element like: (a) focus an
competence manage ; (b) let student to responsible in reach their success; (c)
education strategy must like a replica an working world; (d) Education strategy
should let the student to in crease their knowledge.
To learn Sewing in Vocational School
To learn sewing consists of levels that in accordance with the grade, according to
technical, stuff, cloth, or the model. To Learn sewing, we have to diligent and
passion. We wont learn it just with read and hear some instruction, but we have to
do it dactyl.
Study Evaluation
CBE/T evaluation system bared on et al (Harris 1995) is Assessment in CBE/T is
criterion referenced, not norm-referenced where an individuals achievements are
measured relative to others in a group VEETAC that showed by Harris have
evaluation criteria that apply: validity, reliability, fairness, and flexibility (p.283).
Research Method
This research use qualitative method that researcher hope will get a complete,
dope and trusting data. She observes the real of education activity.
Subject an this research is based on the criterion based selection that usually called
purposive sampling. In collecting data researcher as the key instrument absolve,
interview, and documented by her self using san tools, like; (a) observation
recording; (b) recorder, (c) guide of interview; (d) camera; and (e) writing stuff.
a. Activity to get credibility, like : (1) observe and research in a long time;
(2)
observe
continually;
(3)
doing
member
check,
(4)
data
that, one of the result of education that is people that conscious for respect
each other and dignity
c. Teachers teach way in developing pcychomotiric education
The result of the research showed that teacher demonstrate some practical
didnt use a good stuff and the example arent contrite. They should repeat the
demonstrate because student make many mistake. Harris et al (1995 : 138) said
that, The repetition and practice can support over learning which leads to the
high level of memory characterized by recall
Feed back that teacher do to give that student some information about success,
failed, and the level of competition are being the support for student. As
practice proceeds (with suitable feedback), internal cups leading to prior are
progressively
rejected,
and
internal
cups
associated
with
performance
The researchs result showed that teacher evaluate based on standart qualify
criteria that decide by the teacher. Teacher evaluate from cognitive aspect
based on the, final examination project, and affective aspect based on the
attitude of student, interview, personal report, and attitude scale. But this way is
just based on the teachers memory and didnt use the checklist. Art they
evaluate psychomotoric aspect from practical evaluation in final examination.
Conclusion
1. Teacher still consider that education is knowledge transfer from
teacher to student and from student that un educated being
educated.
2. Teachers way in developing cognitive education still on the level of
competency, knowledge, and comprehension level.
3. Teachers way in developing affective education is with practicing,
where as with warning and threaten are said that still not effective
because followed just in the class.
4. Teachers way in developing psychomotoric education still on the
guide response level.
5. The effective way to develop student motivation is convey the
education purpose, hard working with simulation, competence, give
some praise, and feedback with monitoring way.
6. Teacher way in using the education media didnt effective yet.
7. Teachers way in evaluating. Cognitive aspect that have been
effective is with held theoretical final examination.
8. Teachers way in evaluating affective aspect didnt effective yet
because just based on student daily attitude that teacher
9. Teachers way in evaluating psychomotoric aspect that have been
effective is wit held practical evaluation in final examination.
Reference
Bloom, Benjamin. S. (1982). Human characteristics and school learning. New York:
McGraw-Hill book company.
Dadang Budiaji. (2003). Profil kompetensi lulusan SMK yang diharapkan dunia
industri pariwisata, tata boga, tata busana. Makalah disajikan dalam seminar
nasional implementasi kurikulum SMK 2004 dan harapan dunia industri di
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Davies, Ivor.K. (1991). Pengelolaan belajar (Terjemahan Sudarsono. dkk). New York:
McGraw-Hill. (buku asli The management of learning diterbitkan tahun 1971)
Dedi Supriadi. (2002). Sejarah pendidikan teknologi dan kejuruan di Indonesia.
Jakarta: Depdiknas Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Kejuruan.
Dubois, David.D. (1993). Competencybased performance improvement: A strategi
for organizational change. New York: HRD press, Inc.
Gagne, Robert M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rded). New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston.
Good, Thomas. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1987). Looking in classroom. New York: Harper &
Row Publisher.
Harris, Rogers., et.al. (1997). Competency-based educationa and training. South
Yarra: McMillan Education Australia Pty.Ltd.
Lie, Anita. (2002). Cooperative learning. Jakarta: Gramedia widiasarana Indonesia
Joyce, Bruce., & Weil, Marsha. (1996). Models of teaching.(5thnd). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Magill, A.Richard. (1985). Motor learning (concept & aplication), (2nded). Dubuque:
Wm.c brown publisher.
Miles, Mathew.B., & Huberman,. M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London:
Sage publication.
Pardjono dan Wardan S. (Agustus 2003). Implementasi KBK dalam proses belajar
mengajar di perguruan tinggi. Makalah disajikan dalam seminar kurikulum
berbasis kompetensi, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Reece, Ian., & Walker, Stephen. (1997). Teaching, training and learning. Sunderland:
Business Education Publiher limited.
Sukamto. (1988). Perencanaan & pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan teknologi
dan kejuruan. Jakarta: Depdikbud DIKTI PPLPTK.
Sullivan, Rick. (1995, September). The competency-based approach to training.
Retrieved on 23 mei 23,2005. from http://www. proquest.umi.com/ pdqweb.