Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Analysis
April 2012
Contents
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
7
8
4.1 Element 1: High level survey (social and physical) combined with billing data (where available for
separately metered systems)
4.2 Element 2: Detailed hot water end use metering
4.3 Element 3: Monitoring energy consumption of water heaters
4.4 Additional Macro Data
10
10
10
12
12
13
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
17
17
19
19
20
20
21
22
23
7 REFERENCES
28
30
Figures
Figure 1: Trends in hot water energy consumption, Australia ......................................................................................8
Figure 2: Distribution of Y8 water heater annual energy Victoria 1990 ................................................................... 11
Figure 3: Distribution of Individual Hot Water Events House 1.............................................................................. 24
Figure 4: Distribution of Hot Water Event Duration House 2 (6 months data)...................................................... 25
Figure 5: Relative Hot Water Usage by Month 5 REMP homes............................................................................... 27
Figure 7: Total Energy Consumption 5 REMP homes..............................................................................................30
Figure 8: Monthly Electricity and Gas REMP House 1............................................................................................. 31
Figure 9: Monthly Electricity and Gas REMP House 2 ............................................................................................ 31
Figure 10: Monthly Electricity and Gas REMP House 3 .......................................................................................... 32
Figure 11: Monthly Electricity and Gas REMP House 4 ........................................................................................... 32
Figure 12: Monthly Electricity and Gas REMP House 5........................................................................................... 33
Figure 13: Daily Hot Water Consumption REMP House 1 .......................................................................................... 34
Figure 14: Daily Hot Water Consumption REMP House 2.......................................................................................... 34
Figure 15: Daily Hot Water Consumption REMP House 4.......................................................................................... 35
Figure 16: Time of Day Gas Consumption for REMP House 4.................................................................................... 35
Figure 17: Hot Water Use by Time of Day REMP House 1 ....................................................................................... 36
Figure 18: Hot Water Use by Time of Day REMP House 2 ...................................................................................... 36
Figure 19: Hot Water Use by Time of Day REMP House 3 ...................................................................................... 37
Figure 20: Hot Water Use by Time of Day REMP House 4...................................................................................... 37
Figure 21: Hot Water Use by Time of Day REMP House 5 ......................................................................................38
Figure 22: Hot Water Event Volume Distribution REMP House 1 .......................................................................... 39
Figure 23: Hot Water Litres Per Day Distribution REMP House 1.......................................................................... 39
Figure 24: Hot Water Starts Per Day Distribution REMP House 1..........................................................................40
Tables
Table 1: Key Characteristics of Hot Water Consumption 5 REMP Homes .............................................................. 23
Executive summary
This paper is one in a series of papers on end-use metering methodologies, prepared to assist in the development
of end-use metering campaigns. The full suite of papers are:
Residential End Use Monitoring Program (REMP) General Introduction and Overview;
Residential End Use Monitoring Program (REMP) Water Heating Data Collection and Analysis; (this paper)
Residential End Use Monitoring Program (REMP) Lighting Data Collection and Analysis;
Residential End Use Monitoring Program (REMP) Heating and Cooling Loads Data Collection and Analysis;
Residential End Use Monitoring Program (REMP) General Plug Loads Data Collection and Analysis;
Residential End Use Monitoring Program (REMP) Equipment Recommendations;
Residential End Use Monitoring Program (REMP) Data Management Strategy: Data Handling and Database
Requirements/Specifications.
Each of those papers contains recommendations that are specific to those end uses or elements. This paper
contains general information and recommendations that are applicable to hot water.
The Australian Government is considering end-use metering campaigns to fill various gaps in its knowledge,
especially relating the important residential end-uses. These papers will be used to set out requirements for a
possible future tender.
Water heating is the second largest energy end use in the Australian residential sector (after space heating),
accounting for about 90 PJ of energy consumption in 2008, which is about 23% of total residential energy
consumption.
A good understanding of the demographic and technical factors that drive hot water use will enable:
More reliable projections of household demand for hot water;
A better understanding of the interaction between the total hot water demand, drawoff patterns, and heat losses,
in the water heater and in the pipework;
An understanding of the energy required to supply the hot water via various water heater types;
Greater confidence in the development of policies to reduce water use in general and hot water consumption in
particular;
Greater confidence in the development of policies to reduce water heater energy use and related greenhouse gas
emissions;
Evaluation of programs to reduce hot water energy consumption;
Better consumer advice on system selection and use;
Better advice to consumers on plumbing layouts, water fitting selection and use.
A range of factors are thought to affect hot water consumption including:
Number and age of occupants;
Number, frequency and duration of use of fittings (eg showers, baths, taps);
Number, connections (hot/cold), self-heating capability, frequency of use and cycles, and temperature
preferences for clothes washers and dishwashers;
Number and type of water heaters installed;
Layout of the pipe work in the home and the lagging.
For this paper, the following terms are used:
water heater: water heater (up to the point of discharge into the hot water system)
hot water system: combination of the water heater and the hot water pipework
appliances: clothes washers, dishwashers and other automated devices that may draw hot water from the hot
water system
end use fittings: showers, taps, mixer valves, etc., operated directly by users
plumbing fittings: mixer valves, pressure reductions valves that may be installed in the hot water system.
The metered energy consumption of a water heater is a function of the water heater characteristics (energy
efficiency and losses), the hot water system (plumbing layout and losses), user interaction from end use fittings or
appliances (hot water draw off volumes and timing) and to a lesser extent, the ambient conditions during operation
(small effects from changes in air temperature and cold water supply temperature; large effects where the water
heater collects ambient energy, such as solar thermal or heat pump).
The objective of end use measurement campaigns should be to disaggregate the key factors that affect energy
consumption in a way that allows the influence of the appliance, its installation and its use to be characterised and
separately quantified in a generic fashion. This means that the influence of the water heater characteristics
(efficiency and performance), ambient conditions and user interaction (hot water demand) need to be separately
examined. For water heaters, hot water demand is the largest and most important influence on water heater energy
consumption and is the most poorly documented element, with very few studies recording this parameter. A good
deal of engineering and modelling data exists: this enables the input energy consumption of various water heater
types to be estimated with reasonable accuracy once a hot water delivery profile is assumed.
If the key variables contributing to hot water demand are identified, the relevant data are collected and analysed
correctly, it should be possible to estimate the actual energy consumption of any known water heater which is
installed in any household, which is a key requirement for policy evaluation.
The following data strategy would improve knowledge of hot water use and water heating energy consumption:
High level survey (social and physical) to determine key missing attributes related to water heating (eg water
heaters used, characteristics of the hot water system, appliances, end use fittings, demographic factors, usage
factors);
Quantification of hot water usage profiles (volume, temperature, end use and time) for a significant number of
homes;
Measurement of energy input of water heaters together with hot water usage profiles in a limited number of
homes.
This paper contains a brief discussion on the lessons learnt from the REMP pilot project is outlined in this paper as
well as an overview of some of the hot water related data captured by this project.
1 Introduction
This paper is one of a series of papers on energy end use measurement that have been prepared for the Department
of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE).
This paper provides general information on the operation of different types of hot water systems and examines
data collection strategies that can maximise the information on hot water usage and system performance during
normal use. The purpose of this paper is to examine issues surrounding the in situ measurement of hot water
energy consumption installed and used in homes, and to provide guidance on the parameters that should be
monitored as part of an end use measurement program, in order to obtain a clearer understanding of the nature of
hot water energy use and the energy implications for different types of water heaters, hot water systems, appliances
that use hot water and end use fittings.
The main purpose of data collection should be to:
Identify the main drivers of household hot water demand and hot water energy consumption;
Ensure that the hot water demand and drawoff assumptions used in the simulation or testing of the
performance of water heaters are reflective of actual use (so that the relative energy consumption of different
water heaters can be fairly compared);
Support the development and evaluation of policy measures to reduce energy consumption and emissions
associated with water heating1.
For example, one finding from the REMP pilot homes was that there are a large number of small hot water drawoffs in most homes. A
technological solution to this issue is worthy of investigation.
The main trends that are evident are a decrease in electric storage energy (resulting from a decline in penetration
and also from reduced heat losses after the introduction of Mandatory Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) in
1999), a gradual increase in the ownership of gas systems (which is limited by the extent of the gas distribution
network) and some increase in solar water heaters, especially since 2005 when a number of state and federal
policies came into force. There are also likely to be some declines in hot water use per house arising from the
increasing prevalence of water-efficient appliances (low flow shower head and more efficient clothes washers, or
clothes washers that heat water internally) and fewer people per household2. While there is some data on hot water
usage by end use, data on trends in total hot water consumption are neither well understood nor documented with
firm data.
Fewer people per household will reduce hot water consumption per house, but total energy will probably increase due to the fixed
energy losses associated with supplying each household.
model of hot water use to be developed3. A good understanding of the demographic and technical factors that drive
hot water use will enable:
The current data used to determine energy consumption under AS/NZS4234 (for example) is extremely limited and relatively old.
Initial data from REMP monitoring shows that actual hot water use is highly variable and not very seasonal, which is likely to affect the
comparative performance of many systems.
The factors known to affect hot water consumption are briefly discussed below. However, it should be noted that
the amount of quantitative data available from end use metering programs is still relatively small. The
relationships documented below are either based on technical knowledge of the system operation (from laboratory
data) or are hypotheses that need to be confirmed through end use metering.
2.2 Use
Hot Water Use: Hot water consumption is the biggest single factor that effects the energy consumption of a hot
water system. Very little direct or indirect data are available for hot water use, and what little there is now obsolete:
A study in Victoria in the 1980s measured hot water use in 14 homes (Guthrie and Kimpton, 1987);
Some early studies in the 1970s measured hot water use in 64 flats in Melbourne with instantaneous water
heaters in 64 flats in Melbourne (SECV 1971);
BRANZ have quite a deal of hot water heater end use measurement data for NZ over the past 10 years as part of
their HEEP project (BRANZ 2007) for a wide range of water heater types. However, the NZ water heater market
has a number of significant differences to Australia so few conclusions can be drawn from this data; for example
NZ has a very limited natural gas distribution network, a much higher prevalence of low pressure electric
systems and significantly colder climatic conditions.
Energy End Use Data: Little energy end use data for water heaters is available.
The then NSW electricity wholesaler, Pacific Power, measured the electrical energy consumption of around 250
electric water heaters in 1994 (Pacific Power, 1995). Hot water consumption can be estimated from this data
(assuming close to 100% energy conversion and taking into account heat losses5). However, the prevalence of off
peak units in the sample complicates the analysis).
The way the ABS survey is structured does not capture information on multiple water heaters per household, whether multiple fuels
used in each water heater or the primary energy source. Many respondents do not know what sort of water heater they have.
5
Heat losses for off peak systems cannot be accurately estimated without knowledge of the drawoff profile and tank storage temperature, which
cannot be determined from off peak energy input data alone.
10
Some retailer utility billing data for off peak tariffs was available in the 1990s but since the privatisation and
corporatisation of energy retailing in most states, such data sources have become difficult to access because there
is:
Less consistent classification of users by tariff (over 100 electricity retailers operate in some states);
Much less public information on energy by tariff with increasing corporatisation and privatisation of electricity
utilities and competitive retail markets;
An increasing prevalence of other devices attached to off peak circuits;
A move to time of use tariffs, where all off peak usage is pooled, which means separate tracking of water heating
through separate off peak metering is no longer recorded.
Despite the historical problems with top down data, some state agencies are having success in assembling regional
level utility data for detailed analysis of energy consumption and trends.
Almost no gas water heaters have been metered in situ in the public domain. Some data were collected by the Gas
& Fuel corporation in the 1970s but it is believed that this data have been lost. Gas utilities often prepare estimates
of gas consumption for water heating as part of their pricing proposals to the Australian Energy Regulator.
Distribution Variability of Hot Water Use: There is some information on average hot water energy
consumption per home (mainly through separate metering for off peak electric systems). This data indicates a wide
distribution in hot water consumption per household, as indicated by the following figure. This data suggests that
there is a wide variation in hot water use from household to household, but other explanatory data is not available.
Some data are known about time of hot water use, but this is very limited (see EES 2004 for details).
11
2.3 Technology
Characteristics of New Water Heaters:
The performance of electric storage water heaters is relatively predictable. They are regulated for MEPS, so design
heat loss levels are known according to the size of the tank and the age. There is little public data about sales of
each by size, but as there are relatively few manufacturers, this information could be requested from the suppliers.
Some data is available on the performance of each model of gas water heaters through the AGA labelling scheme
(although critical data such as maintenance rate, startup energy and burner efficiency are not accessible). Gas
water heaters are in the process of being regulated so this data may become more accessible in due course. Again,
model market shares are more difficult to obtain.
Most solar and heat pump water heaters are rated for The Small-scale Technology Certificates (STCs - previously
RECs under MRET), but these are not necessarily good predictors of actual performance on their own. The
underlying modelling data used to generate STC numbers are very complicated and very difficult to access. Sales by
model are not known.
The physical plumbing layout of the hot water system, fixtures and fittings are also significant. Major factors
include the presence of water saving devices (eg low flow shower heads) and whether clothes washers and
dishwashers are connected to the hot supply. Pipe layouts, the flow rates of each fitting and frequency of drawoffs
all influence hot water use. For a given flow rate, the longer the pipe run, the longer the time that shower and tap
users have to wait for water at the required temperature, and hence the greater the tendency to run subtemperature water to waste. Energy is wasted in the rejected water, and also lost from the pipe after the draw ends
(unless there is another draw almost immediately).
The orientation of collector panels will influence the performance of solar water heaters, and exposed locations can
influence the heat loss of storage tanks, whatever the energy type. The prevalence of mixer taps can mean frequent
small drawoffs of hot water (many not perceived by the user) unless the design is set to a default 100% cold
position6.
Data from the REMP pilot appeared to indicate that very small hot water events (less than 2 litres) made up as much as 20% of all hot
water consumption. While this is to be further investigated, it would appear that mixer taps may be responsible for much of this wasted
energy.
12
would learn this behaviour by trial and error). Small electric storage systems have limited short-term capacity and
response time and where this causes a constraint, households may learn to limit peak use of hot water within the
recovery period (eg may encourage spacing of showers). Low pressure electric storage systems have limited flow
rate and practically limit hot water energy consumption through a low energy delivery rate. Long start-up times for
instantaneous gas water heaters, or long pipe runs for any type of water heater, may discourage the use of hot
water for small tasks. Relatively unlimited energy supply from gas systems is unlikely to constrain total hot water
use (which may manifest itself as very high hot water consumption in some homes).
For instantaneous gas systems with no storage, there is some delay between the time the hot water tap is turned on until hot water is
delivered. A certain amount of energy is required to start the burner and increase the temperature of the heat exchanger and other
fittings to the hot water delivery temperature. This initial energy requirement (in order to get hot water) is called start up loss (may be
0.2 to 0,4 MJ), while unheated water is term wasted water (although the water may or may not be wasted, depending on the application)
(may be up to a few litres).
13
well as the frequency (spacing) and duration of hot water events. These attributes are not well known and this type
of data is an important complement to information about the water heater.
Efficiency of plumbing distribution is a house design issue. Reducing distribution losses in existing homes is
difficult and expensive, if possible at all. However, the information gained from monitoring can help frame design
rules for new construction as well as the value of retrofits (such as pipe lagging). There may be interactions of
plumbing losses with water heater type in that some types lend themselves to greater flexibility in location, and can
be sited nearer the main drawoff points. Instantaneous water heaters are usually associated with additional energy
losses because the water that does not reach the target supply temperature during startup, may also be wasted
(unless it is used for a volumetric purpose, such as filling a bath).
For electric systems, typical total annual energy consumption is in the range 2,000 kWh/year to 5,000 kWh/year
and heat losses are of the order of 300 kWh/year to 1,000 kWh/year (since MEPS came into effect in 1999 we can
assume that there are very few pre-MEPS units left in operation.
For gas storage water heaters, energy consumption typically ranges from 10 GJ/year to 40 GJ/year. Heat losses
will be of the order of 4 GJ/year to 8 GJ/year. Conversion efficiency is typically in the range 75% to 90%
(theoretically). So hot water usage constitutes 60% to 80% of the total energy consumption. Smaller hot water
loads have a higher proportion of losses.
For gas instantaneous water heaters, the energy consumption is estimated to be of a similar order to gas storage
(should be less for more typical hot water deliveries). However, there is some limited anecdotal evidence that on
average instantaneous gas water heater users have higher hot water consumption than gas storage systems. It is
unclear why this may be the case (if it is in fact true) it may be driven by demographics (prevalence in larger
householders, newer homes) and/or the lack of constraints on hot water delivery. Instantaneous systems do not
have storage losses, but there is a start-up loss of the order of 0.2 to 0.5 MJ per start (depends on the interval
between starts). Conversion efficiency is typically slightly lower in the range 75% to 80%, although some new
systems are now in the condensing range8 (>85%). So hot water usage constitutes 70% to 85% of the total energy
consumption, but the overall task efficiency is quite sensitive to the actual number of starts per day (fewer large hot
water events can be more efficiently delivered than a larger number of small events). The gas water heater standard
AS4552 (used as the basis for the AGA labelling scheme) assumes 19 starts per day, but the origin of this
specification uncertain and its is unclear how representative this is today9. If the number of starts changes in
proportion to hot water load, then instantaneous systems will deliver roughly consistent overall efficiency for small
to large hot water loads. In contrast, overall task efficiency of storage systems declines with declining total hot
water use.
High efficiency heat exchangers usually have a larger thermal mass and therefore higher start up losses.
Collection of this type of data would in fact be a key objective of an expanded REMP monitoring program. The impact of mixer taps
would be an important element in understanding this data.
14
Hot water consumption presents some special problems in terms of end-use metering. Monitoring of the input
energy consumption alone does not necessarily provide an accurate picture of the pattern of hot water
consumption, without information on the characteristics and performance of the individual water heater that is
being monitored. Even then, some parameters can only be estimated indirectly. Key issues by water heater type10
are set out below.
10
15
11
There may be reduced start up losses when hot water events are closely spaced as the water heater components may still be warm.
An alternative approach would be to measure volume of pumped flow to the solar panel and the inlet and outlet temperature to
estimate energy delivery. The complexity of accurately measuring the performance of solar systems in the fields should not be
underestimated.
12
16
The most reliable way to measure hot water energy delivered is to use an integrating heat meter that looks at the
temperature rise (from cold supply to hot delivery) and combine this with water flow to calculate total energy
delivered. While heat meters provide the most accurate measure of energy, it is still very useful to have separate
measures of hot and cold water temperatures and hot water volumes where possible.
Ideally some understanding of where hot water is being used will provide a better basis the overall household
modelling hot water consumption, taking demographic factors into account. The majority of hot water is used in
showers, but this will vary significantly across individual households. Determining the end use of hot water would
require monitoring of hot water supply temperatures at a number of outlets around the home. Hot water usage at a
particular point would appear as temperature spike in the supply pipe while water is used, and then it would
gradually cool when water flow has stopped. This may be expensive for a large number of homes. It may be
possible to track temperatures at three or four strategic hot water outlets. This temperature data has to be matched
with hot water flow and temperature data metered at the water heater itself to be useful. Where clothes washers
17
and dishwashers are in a position to use hot water from the house supply (many have a cold-only connection, so
they must heat their own water) their hot water use can be estimated from matching the time record of their
electricity consumption (from an in line electricity meter) with the record of hot water drawoff from the water
heater.
It is important to understand that average hot water consumption will vary substantially from house to house. On
top of that, hot water consumption within each household is also likely to be highly variable from day to day. Hot
water use is normally expected to be somewhat seasonal, although data from the REMP pilot homes did not exhibit
much seasonal variation in the volume of hot water usage. So analysis techniques need to focus on methodologies
on how to characterise this variability and where possible relate consumption back to the key demographic and
other drivers.
Measurement of the hot water usage profiles needs to be the primary focus of any end use metering campaign. A
good deal of engineering and modelling data exists that enables the input energy consumption of various water
heater types to be estimated with good accuracy once a hot water delivery profile is known. Estimating the hot
water consumption from water heater energy input data alone is usually impossible with any accuracy.
Determining the field performance of water heaters during normal use (input energy and output energy) requires
very extensive monitoring of numerous parameters (especially for types that interact with the environment, such
as solar systems), so in many cases this is not practical.
18
There are several ways to collect data about household hot water use, water heater energy use and the factors
influencing them. These include:
Surveys of physical characteristics of the water heater, the stock of hot water using appliances, household
demographics and reported behaviour;
Monitoring the energy input into the water heaters (usually of limited value for more complex systems);
Monitoring the time, volume and energy content of the hot water drawoff;
Monitoring the use of hot water at key points (eg the shower, the clothes washer);
Monitoring energy use only (this is relatively easy for controlled electricity tariffs, if all the energy through the
controlled tariff meter is used for water heating).
Generally, the approach that yields the most reliable data is a combination of survey and statistical techniques with
actual monitoring of hot water use (plus water heater energy input where possible).
Using this approach, detailed metering of selected energy and hot water flows in a relatively small sample of
households (of the order of 100 or so households) (which is the most expensive technical option) can be expanded
to national estimates using larger scale surveys of households and census data.
This may need to be done in stages. Once the extent of variability in usage is established in smaller sample, it may
be possible to estimate the sample sizes necessary to achieve given levels of confidence for the population as a
whole (or at least key parts of it).
Without a detailed knowledge of the demographic and technical drivers of hot water consumption, it is not possible
to correct for those demographic factors that may influence small end use metering samples when expanding these
to estimate national hot water use. Nor will it be possible to accurately estimate future trends in hot water
consumption.
A strategic approach to hot water consumption is required. It is recommended that three separate but related
elements be undertaken in order to gather a more complete picture of hot water energy use. This will ensure the
optimum use of limited resources. A notional indication of the scale of the task is provided at this stage. A more
detailed analysis will provide a more accurate estimate of required sample sizes.
4.1 Element 1: High level survey (social and physical) combined with billing
data (where available for separately metered systems)
A high level survey provides the most cost effective option to collect a range of demographic data together with
ownership information (including brand and model of water heater) and billing data where this is available for
separately metered appliances. The sample needs to be segmented in accordance with recognised demographic
categories included in the Census. Aspects such as number and age of occupants, income details, housing details
(size, type, rent/own), gas supply connected, urban/rural and selected appliance ownership data would need to be
collected. In addition, billing records for electricity and gas would be collected (last two years of quarterly records
collection through utilities is time consuming and slow)13.
It may be possible to use new innovative online techniques to collect much of the data. However, some segments
(eg older, lower income) may still require face to face survey techniques. Some parameters like system details, solar
configuration and solar orientation14 will usually require some site inspection by trained personnel in order to get
accurate data.
13
Low energy water heaters (such as solar systems) may have low boost energy, which will be less apparent in utility bills. Dedicated off
peak systems provide a direct measure of water heater input energy.
14
It may be possible to examine solar panel orientation from high resolution aerial photographs which are now readily available at no
cost for many urban areas. See http://www.nearmap.com/help/map-features for an example.
19
Nominally, a survey of several thousand households would be required to adequately cover all demographic
categories and to allow an initial hot water end use model to be developed. Where quarterly gas billing data are
available a conditional demand analysis (CDA) could provide good estimates of the share of gas use that goes to
water heating, as distinct from space heating or cooking (if present). This does not yield any data on usage patterns
or starts and only very coarse seasonal data (if any).
20
15
Typically stock attributes are determined from characteristics of new products flowing through a stock model.
21
16
From a policy perspective, what matters is the use of conventional fuels for boost energy. While measuring this does indicate the use of
these fuels in real systems, it does not provide any understanding of why boost energy may be high or low for a particular house. So
measuring the boost energy for solar systems really requires full system monitoring to be useful for field performance assessment.
22
Starting in February 2010, the REMP pilot project undertook detailed end use metering of five houses in
Melbourne. This metering continued for over a year and included the installation of meters on each of the
switchboard circuits, the 12 key (most used) lights, and 16 key appliances. Also installed were humidity and
temperature sensors (both internal and external), in-line gas and water meters, occupancy sensors in major living
areas and hot water temperature sensors in all there were around 60 individual channels (loggers) per house.
The pilot project ultimately collected over 220 million datapoints, and provided both valuable insights into user
behaviour and end use metering project challenges.
REMP monitoring has revealed that hot water usage patterns are extremely variable within a household and across
households. The main drivers for this variation are not well understood. The key parameters for the 5 REMP
homes are set out in Table 1
Occupants
144
36
74 (51%)
64
16
29 (45%)
107
27
62 (58%)
56
56
46 (82%)
68
34
30 (44%)
Average
88
3.8
23.1
N/A
Note: CV is the coefficient of variation = standard deviation over the mean. Hot water volumes are the measured volumes of hot water
delivered by the water heater.
Hot water volume was recorded at 1 min intervals in the pilot homes. This revealed a large number of very small
events in all homes. About half of all events are less than one litre and the drivers are not yet fully understood. This
could be generated by tap use with so called flick mixers (their central position when off generates a mix of hot and
cold water when lifted) but full investigations in the REMP houses are yet to be conducted. Four of the houses had
25 to 30 hot water events per day while the single person house had about 12 events per day. However, hot water
consumption is fairly evenly distributed in event sizes up to 60 litres (for House 1 shown) as illustrated in Figure 3
23
In house 1, illustrated above, 46% of the hot water events were less than 1 litre in volume (this house uses an
instantaneous gas water heater, so this is a critical point), and 75% of all events were less than 5 litres, which
means that barely any hot water would be delivered for some of these events. These small events accounted for 15%
of all hot water consumption in this house. Similar analysis of other REMP houses revealed similar data. The pilot
has confirmed the importance of 1 minute hot water volume data in order to better understand hot water drivers17.
This is illustrated by the data on hot water event duration from House 2 below. In the REMP pilot homes more
than half of all hot water events are 2 minutes or less in duration. Many of the events may be only 1 minute or
shorter as all data was recorded at synchronised at 1 minute intervals rather than at the start or end of events.
17
If mixer taps turn out to be a key driver of small hot water events, it may be possible to characterise this aspect of hot water use by a survey where
the users report the usual position and setting: this may be a clearer way to determine the prevalence of this practice is in the community.
24
The wide distribution of hot water loads suggests that traditional approaches for estimating hot water energy
consumption during normal use may need to be reviewed. Simulation of the performance of the entire hot water
system (including pipework losses) would be needed to determine the effect on energy use of high variability in
events.
Further analysis may reveal whether there are any weather correlations with hot water use - this is critical for
renewable energy systems (a larger sample would also be required to be reliable). Initial review of REMP pilot data
revealed that there was no strong seasonal effect in hot water volumes. Seasonal usage of hot water is illustrated in
25
Figure 5. This shows that monthly usage in all homes is somewhat random in nature, but there is a pronounced dip
in 4 of the 5 homes over summer (December to February). Review of the data suggests that this is due to absences
from the house for holidays rather than a reduction in hot water use in summer. A more reliable way to
characterise hot water use would be to estimate total energy consumption (hot water per occupied day) without
absences and then correct (ex post) for an absences as they occur18. This would provide a more robust model for
wider application. While it is true that the majority of absences due to holidays occur in the summer period, this is
difficult to control with a relatively small end use sample, so data on absences should be obtained from larger scale
surveys.
Daily hot water consumption in Appendix 3 gives a better impression of the day to day variability of hot water use.
18
Absences can be determined from hot water data and other parameters if measured (lighting is usually a good indicator, but also PIR sensors if
used).
26
A key area of research is also whether it is feasible to develop a demographic model of hot water consumption (and
variability).
More hot water data from the REMP pilot homes is shown in Appendix 1
27
7 References
ABS4602 2005, Environmental Issues: People's Views And Practices, Australian Bureau of Statistics, December
2008. Available from www.abs.gov.au
AS/NZS 6400:2005, Water efficient productsRating and labelling
BIS 2008, The Household Appliances Market in Australia 2008, VOL 4: HOT WATER SYSTEMS, BIS Shrapnel,
Sydney. Available by subscription.
BRANZ 2007, Energy Use in NZ Households: Report on the 10 Year Analysis for the Household Energy End-use
Project (HEEP), Building Research Establishment of NZ, available from www.branz.co.nz
DSE 2008, H2OME: A guide to permanent water savings in your home, Department of Sustainability and
Environment, Victoria, January 2008.
EES 2004, Hot Water Time of Use Data, prepared by Energy Efficient Strategies for EL20, March 2004.
EES 2008, Energy Use in the Australian Residential Sector 1986 2020, prepared by Energy Efficient Strategies
for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, June 2008. Available from
www.energyrating.gov.au in the electronic library.
EES 2009, Hardware for End-Use Measurement: assessment of potential technology, prepared by EES, Robert
Simpson and Kevin Lane for DEWHA, July 2009 (working draft).
Greenworld 2007, A Pilot Study of the Impact of 3-star Showerheads on Household
Water Consumption, Greenworld Energy for Yarra Valley Water, November 2007.
Guthrie and Kimpton, Pilot Study to Define the Patterns and Quantities of Domestic Hot Water Consumption in
Victoria, by Ken Guthrie and N.C. Kimpton, Victorian Solar Energy Council, January 1987, part of NERDDC
project 817.
GWA 1993, Benefits and Costs of Implementing Minimum Energy Performance Standards for Household
Electrical Appliances in Australia, by George Wilkenfeld & Associates (with Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory), for
State Electricity Commission of Victoria, July 1993. Chapter 7 electric water heaters. See
http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/detailsgwa-meps1993.html
GWA 2004, Regulation Impact Statement: Proposed National System of Mandatory Water Efficiency Labelling
for Selected Products, George Wilkenfeld and Associates for the Department of the Environment and Heritage,
Australia, May 2004.
GWA 2005, Expanding the Australian Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (WELS) Scheme: Final Report,
George Wilkenfeld and Associates for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra.
GWA 2006, Water Saving Requirements for New Residential Buildings in Victoria:
Options for flexible compliance, George Wilkenfeld and Associates for the Department of Sustainability and
Environment, May 2006.
GWA 2007, Specifying the Performance of Water Heaters for New Houses in the Building Code of Australia, by
George Wilkenfeld & Associates (et al) for the Australian Building Codes Board, December 2007.
GWA 2008, For Consultation: Regulation Impact Statement: Minimum water efficiency standards for clothes
washers and dishwashers and water efficiency labelling of combined washer/dryers, George Wilkenfeld and
Associates for the Department of the Environment, Water Heritage and the Arts, September 2008.
GWA 2010, Decision Regulatory Impact Statement Phasing Out Greenhouse Intensive Water Heaters in
Australian Homes, George Wilkenfeld and Associates with National Institute of Economic and Industry Research,
for the National Framework for Energy Efficiency, November 2010.
28
ISF 2008, Analysis of Australian Opportunities for More Water-Efficient Toilets, Institute for Sustainable
Futures. for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008.
Marsden Jacob 2006, Securing Australias Urban Water Supplies: Opportunities and impediments. A discussion
paper prepared for the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, November 2006.
Pacific Power 1995, The Residential End-Use Study, see
http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/detailsresidential-execsumm.html for executive summary.
SECV 1970, Williamstown Hot Water Study, prepared by Jim Lacey from the STATE Electricity Commission of
Victoria and the study was undertaken jointly with the City of Williamstown (electricity supply) and the Housing
Commission. (summary included in EES 2004).
SEW 2008, Household Waterwise Makeover Program 2007-08, South East Water, August 2008.
WSAA 2008, National Performance Report 2006-07: Urban water utilities. Water Services Association of
Australia (WSAA) and National Water Commission.
YVW 2005, Yarra Valley Water 2004 Residential End Use Measurement Study, Yarra Valley Water, June 2005.
YVW 2008, 2007 Appliance Stock and Usage Patterns Survey Asoka Athuraliya, Kein Gan and Peter Roberts,
Yarra Valley Water, May 2008.
.
29
Total energy consumption of metered gas and electricity of the 5 homes over a year is illustrated in
Figure 6 this is useful as it gives a total overall comparative snapshot of the metered energy sources. House 3 had
a highest gas and electricity consumption and is well above the state average (it is the largest physical house).
Houses 1 and 2 had more typical gas consumption (closer to the Victorian average). Houses 4 and 5 had quite low
gas consumption (on further analysis, this was for good reasons). The data presented needs to be put in the context
of typical energy consumption of gas in Victoria values of 60GJ a year are a typical value for residential, so the
data needs to be considered in this context (heating loads in Victoria are considerably higher than all other
mainland states for a range of reasons). Also the Victorian summer of 2010/2011 was very mild with few hot days,
so air conditioner use and peak loads were considerably lower than normal. All monthly data is for the year May
2010 to April 2011.
The monthly distribution for each of the 5 homes is illustrated in the following figures. Houses 1 to 3 showed very
strong seasonal gas consumption. House 4 had low gas use as there is a single occupant who keeps unusual hours.
House 5 had no gas space heating, so gas is only used for hot water and cooking. Houses 2 to 5 had gas storage hot
water, House 1 had an instantaneous gas hot water system.
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
The interesting finding is that time of day usage is not obviously seasonal. All houses exhibit strong morning peaks
in hot water use and most also show strong evening peaks, although these are more variable in their timing and
size. The houses vary from being slightly morning dominant to slightly evening dominant, but in practical terms
there is quite a lot of hot water use throughout the day in the REMP pilot homes. Note that the vertical scales vary
on these figures.
The following figures provide more detail on REMP House 1 (instantaneous gas water heater) in terms of event
sizes, starts and litres per day.
38
Figure 22: Hot Water Litres Per Day Distribution REMP House 1
39
Figure 23: Hot Water Starts Per Day Distribution REMP House 1
The above distribution is a count of individual hot water events in each day of operation. For analysis purposes,
events that were less than 0.2 litres were ignored.
40
A joint initiative of Australian, State and Territory and New Zealand Governments