Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CASE NUMBER:
IN-TR-15-000XXXX
[sic]
California state
Some county
)
)
)
It is True:
Comes now, my friend's name, by a limited and restricted appearance, appearing specially, and not
generally, a lawful man, without the UNITED STATES [28 USC 1746 (1)], Authorized Representative, Attorney in
Fact, Third Party Intervenor, for the ens legis trust with notice and as a Real Party in Interest, hereinafter "I, me, my,
myself, Affiant," by the doctrine of necessity, being majority in age, of sound mind, competent to testify, without
any legal disabilities, do state that the truths and facts herein are of first hand personal knowledge, true, correct,
complete, certain and not misleading, hereby affirm, attest, depose and say under penalty of perjury by international
commercial law that:
In this instant matter, regardless if deemed in-artfully plead, I must be held to a less stringent standard than formal
pleadings drafted by bar-admitted attorneys and can only be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it appears beyond
a doubt that my friend's name can prove no set of facts in support of [his] claims which would entitle them to
relief. [in the nature of Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S., 519-521; Richardson v. Flemming, 651 F 2d at 368 (quoting
Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d. 251, (1976); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 78 S. Ct. 99,
2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Alexander v Ware, 714 F.2d 416 (1983); Hayes v Western Weighing and Inspection Bureau,
838 F.2d. 1434 (5th Cir. 1988))]. my friend's names factual allegations in the text must be accepted as true,
along with any reasonable inferences that may be drawn there from. [in the nature of Ryland v. Shapiro, 708 F.2d.
987 (5th Cir.1983)]. my friend's name's petition must not be read too narrowly, but must instead be read
liberally so that any inferences may be drawn there from. [in the nature of Bruce v. Wade, 537 F.2d.850 (5th
Cir.1976)].
This Affidavit is primarily for the purpose of correcting errors for statements made in court by my friend's name, AR,
Attorney in Fact, Third Party Intervenor for The MY FRIEND'S NAME ens legis trust, on or about June 24,
2015 AD for Case No. IN-TR-15-000XXXX to present a correction for record, if any record was made by the court,
regarding statements made.
The error(s) made consist(s) of . . .
When in court room number 2 two, I asked Judge's Name dba The HONORABLE JUDGE'S NAME hereinafter,
Administrator/Judge, for an opportunity to exhaust all of my administrative procedure/process and remedies. As a
result of my asking to do so the Administrator/Judge asked me if I waived time, and I mistakenly answered "no", and
did not waive time.
Form adopted for educational use
by: my friend's name, Sui Juris, AR, [sic]
Effective 6/25/2015
IN-TR-15-000XXXX
Administrative Procedure Form
Page 1 of 4
IN-TR-15-000XXXX
Administrative Procedure Form
Page 2 of 4
Seal
IN-TR-15-000XXXX
Administrative Procedure Form
Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
)
)
It is Affirmed:
)
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)
on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
(SEAL)
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
X:
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC
The value of the case is about 1000.00 to 1200.00, so we thought we would see what we could do. My friend
made a mistake when I went to court and coached him before we served this. When served to the court, we
served a copy to the clerk, not an original, for the judge/administrator to review. Came back after a weekend and
went back to the same Clerk with Affidavit for Proof of Service affirmed to unlimited commercial liability, just
in case an attempt to lose the document or some other attempt at trickery. The Clerk said, "I do not want that"
then accepted an original copy for this document from us to "FILE" in the court. She immediately printed the
Judge/Administrator's reply which was to move the Court date to December 1, 2015 from that very date of July
7, 2015, which is 121 days in commerce, thereby losing subject matter jurisdiction. I will write that up later for
that court date. Freeman Lawyer did this for his friend! The COURT'S lose subject matter jurisdiction after 120
plus 1 days. I am not an attorney nor do I offer legal advice. If you want legal advice, bend over and kiss your
own ass, then contact an attorney. If you want to win, learn the law! Your Freeman Lawyer in the Law!
END OF DOCUMENT
IN-TR-15-000XXXX
Administrative Procedure Form
Page 4 of 4