Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shoal,
also
known
as Scarborough
Reef,[1] Democracy
Reef (Chinese: ; pinyin: Mnzh Jio),Huangyan Island[2] (simplified
Chinese: ; traditional Chinese: ; pinyin: Hungyn Do), Bajo de
Masinloc[3] and Panatag Shoal[4] (Filipino: Kulumpol ng Panatag), is a shoal located
between the Macclesfield Bankand Luzon island in the South China Sea.
It is a disputed territory claimed by the People's Republic of China, Republic of China
(Taiwan), and the Philippines. The shoal's status is often discussed in conjunction
with other territorial disputes in the South China Sea such as those involving
the Spratly Islands and the Paracel Islands. Since the 2012 Scarborough Shoal
standof, access to the territory has been restricted by the People's Republic of
China.[5]
The shoal was named after an East India Company tea-clipper which was wrecked
on one of its rocks on September 12, 1784
Geography
Scarborough Shoal forms a triangle-shaped chain of reefs and rocks with a
perimeter of 46 km (29 mi). It covers an area, including an inner lagoon, of
150 km2 (58 sq mi). The shoal's highest point, South Rock, measures 1.8 m (5.9 ft)
above water during high tide. Located north of it is a channel, approximately 370 m
(1,214 ft) wide and 911 m (3036 ft) deep, leading into the lagoon. Several other
coral rocks encircle the lagoon, forming a largeatoll.[1]
The shoal is about 198 kilometres (123 mi) west of Subic Bay. To the east of the
shoal is the 5,0006,000 m (16,00020,000 ft) deep Manila Trench. The nearest
landmass is Palauig, Zambales on Luzon island in the Philippines, 220 km (137 mi)
due east.
Activities in the surrounding area[
The shoal and its surrounding area are rich fishing grounds - the atoll's lagoon
provides some protection for fishing boats during inclement weather.
There are thick layers of guano lying on the rocks in the area. Several diving
excursions and amateur radio operations,DX-peditions (1994, 1995, 1997 and
2007), have been carried out in the area
Sovereignty dispute
The People's Republic of China and the Republic of China (Taiwan) claim that
Chinese people discovered the shoal centuries ago and that there is a long history
of Chinese fishing activity in the area. The shoal lies within the nine-dotted
line drawn by China on maps marking its claim to islands and relevant waters
consistent with UNCLOS within the South China Sea. [9] An article published in May
2012 in the PLA Daily states that Chinese astronomer Guo Shoujing went to the
island in 1279, under the Yuan dynasty, as part of an empire-wide survey called
"Measurement of the Four Seas" ( ).[10] In 1979 historical geographer Han
Zhenhua ( ) was among the first scholars to claim that the point called
"Nanhai" (literally, "South Sea") in that astronomical survey referred to Scarborough
Shoal.[11] In 1980 during a conflict withVietnam for sovereignty over the Paracel
The DFA also claims that the name Bajo de Masinloc (translated as "under
Masinloc") itself identifies the shoal as a particular political subdivision of the
Philippine Province of Zambales, known as Masinloc. [20] As basis, the Philippines
cites the Island of Palmas Case, where the sovereignty of the island was adjudged
by the international court in favor of the Netherlands because of its efective
jurisdiction and control over the island despite the historic claim of Spain. Thus, the
Philippines argues that the historic claim of China over the Scarborough Shoal still
needs to be substantiated by a historic title, since a claim by itself is not among the
internationally recognized legal basis for acquiring sovereignty over territory.
It also asserts that there is no indication that the international community has
acquiesced to China's historical claim, and that the activity of fishing of private
Chinese individuals, claimed to be a traditional exercise among these waters, does
not constitute a sovereign act of the Chinese state. [21]
The Philippine government argues that since the legal basis of its claim is based on
the international law on acquisition of sovereignty, the Exclusive Economic
Zone claim on the waters around Scarborough is diferent from the sovereignty
exercised by the Philippines in the shoal. [20][22]
The Philippine government has proposed taking the dispute to the International
Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) as provided in Part XV of the United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea, but the Chinese government has rejected this,
insisting on bilateral discussions.[23][24][25]
The Philippines also claims that as early as the Spanish colonization of the
Philippines, Filipino fishermen were already using the area as a traditional fishing
ground and shelter during bad weather. [26]
Several official Philippine maps published by Spain and United States in 18th and
20th centuries show Scarborough Shoal as Philippine territory. The 18th-century
map "Carta hydrographica y chorographica de las Islas Filipinas" (1734) shows the
Scarborough Shoal then was named as Panacot Shoal. The map also shows the
shape of the shoal as consistent with the current maps available as today. In 1792,
another map drawn by the Malaspina expedition and published in 1808 in Madrid,
Spain also showed Bajo de Masinloc as part of Philippine territory. The map showed
the route of the Malaspina expedition to and around the shoal. It was reproduced in
the Atlas of the 1939 Philippine Census, which was published in Manila a year later
and predates the controversial 1947 Chinese South China Sea Claim Map that shows
no Chinese name on it.[27] Another topographic map drawn in 1820 shows the shoal,
named there as "Bajo Scarburo," as a constituent part of Sambalez (Zambales
province).[28] During the 1900s, Mapa General, Islas Filipinas, Observatorio de
Manila, and US Coast and Geodetic Survey Map include the Scarborough Shoal
named as "Baju De Masinloc."[29] A map published in 1978 by the Philippine National
Mapping and Resource Information Authority, however, did not indicate Scarborough
Shoal as part of the Philippines.[30]
In 1957, the Philippine government conducted an oceanographic survey of the area
and together with the US Navy force based in then U.S. Naval Base Subic
Bayin Zambales, used the area as an impact range for defense purposes. An 8.3
meter high flag pole flying a Philippine flag was raised in 1965. An iron tower that
was to serve as a small lighthouse was also built and operated the same year. [31]
[32]
In 1992, the Philippine Navy rehabilitated the lighthouse and reported it to
Given that the shoal is not habitable and the historical claims are weak at best
China is currently violating article 56 of UNCLOS 3. [38] [39] by blocking access to the
lagoon to the Philippines.