Wyong Road Enviro Factors Appendix P

Appendix P
Geotechnical investigations report
NB11462 Pacific Highway and Wyong Road intersection upgrade

Review of Environmental Factors
Appendix P
Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road

MR335 Intersection and Approaches Upgrade
Geotechnical Investigations Report

Revision B
Document No. NB11462-ESG-RP-0002
November 2012
Contents
1.
Introduction
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
1
1
2
General
Scope of work
Report structure
2.
Project appreciation
3.
Background review
3.1.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
3.5.
3.6.
Sources of information
Soils and geology
Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS) assessment
Groundwater
Existing Rail Overbridge Drawings
Previous geotechnical investigations
3.6.1. RMS pavement investigation: 2523/01

3.6.2. RMS pavement investigation 2523/02
3.7.
4.
Site visit and inspection
Scope of geotechnical investigations
12
4.1.
4.2.
4.3.
12
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
General
Planning and approval
Borehole drilling
4.3.1. Monitoring wells
4.4.
4.5.
4.6.
4.7.
5.
Cone Penetration Testing (CPTu) and Shear vane testing (Su)

Test pits
Laboratory testing
Survey
Result of geotechnical investigations
19
5.1.
19
19
23
26
27
Laboratory testing
5.1.1. Mechanical
5.1.2. Chemical
5.2.
5.3.
6.
5
6
7
8
8
9
9
10
11
Groundwater observations
Field testing
Geotechnical conditions
29
6.1.
6.2.
29
30
30
30
Subsurface conditions
Material properties of geotechnical units
6.2.1. (Unit 1) Fill

6.2.2. (Unit 2) Alluvial deposits
SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ
NB11462-ESG-RP-0002_B_Geotechnical Investigations Report.docx
PAGE i
6.2.3. (Unit 3A) Residual soil

6.2.4. (Unit 4) Bedrock
35
37
6.3.
39
Interpretation of CPTu Data
7.
References
41
8.
Limitations
43
Appendix A Site investigation location plan and geotechnical sections 45

Appendix B Background information
46
Appendix C Explanatory notes and engineering logs
52
Appendix D Laboratory test certificates
59
Appendix E Undrained Shear Strength and Over Consolidation Ratio

Profiles
62

PAGE ii
Document history and status

Revision
Date issued
Reviewed by
Approved by
Date approved
Revision type
24 Sept 2012
S.Raynsford
R.Casimir
24 Sept 2012
RMS Review
28 Nov 2012
S.Raynsford
R.Casimir
28 Nov 2012
Final
Distribution of copies
Revision
Copy no
Quantity
Issued to
RMS Project Manager
RMS Project Manager
Printed:
27 November 2012
Last saved:
27 November 2012 05:51 PM
File name:
Author:
David Andrew
Project manager:
Robert Casimir
Name of organisation:
Roads and Maritime Services (RMS)
Name of project:
Pacific Highway & Wyong Road Intersection and Approaches Upgrade
Name of document:
Document version:
Revision B
Project number:
NB11462

PAGE iii
1. Introduction
1.1. General
Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM) has been commissioned by Roads and Maritime Services
(RMS) to undertake the concept design and prepare an environmental assessment for
Pacific Highway (HW 10) and Wyong Road (MR335) intersection and approaches
upgrade, Tuggerah NSW. The purpose of this Geotechnical Investigation Report (GIR) is
to present the results of geotechnical investigations undertaken and describe the
geotechnical model developed for the site.
This report has been prepared in accordance with Section 3.3.2.5 Geotechnical Report
(Geotechnical Investigation Report) as outlined in the Professional Services Contract
(PSC) and SKMs proposal for Consultancy Services for Contract 11.2911.1603.
The following Geotechnical Investigation Report (GIR) summarises the scope of work
undertaken and the geotechnical investigation results and ground models prepared for the
project.
1.2. Scope of work
The scope of work for the investigations and associated reporting included the following
activities:
Undertaking of geotechnical site investigations including: borehole drilling, test pit

excavation, cone penetration tests, dynamic cone penetrometer testing, and
laboratory testing.
Documenting the geotechnical information on the subsurface conditions along the
proposed intersection and approaches upgrade.
Providing a summary of the laboratory test result.
Preparation of a ground model for the project alignment.
The site investigations were undertaken generally in accordance with the Report on
Existing Geotechnical Information and Detailed Geotechnical Investigations Proposal Plan
(SKM, 2012a) and the requirements as documented in the projects Review of
Environmental Factors (SKM, 2012b) and Environmental Management Plan (SKM,
2012c).
Interpretation of the subsurface conditions and design recommendations are provided
under a separate cover as documented in Pacific Highway (HW 10) and Wyong Road
(MR 335) Intersection and Approaches Upgrade Geotechnical Design Report (SKM,
2012d).

1.3. Report structure

The structure of this report is as follows:
Section 2 Outlines a description of the project.
Section 3 Summarises the desktop study undertaken.
Section 4 Describes the scope of geotechnical investigations undertaken.
Section 5 Presents the geotechnical investigation results.
Section 6 Summarises the geotechnical model and subsurface conditions encountered.
Section 7 Provides a list of the referenced information used in the GIR.
Section 8 Outlines the limitations on the use of this report.

2. Project appreciation
The Pacific Highway and Wyong Road intersection is currently a four leg dual lane
circulating roundabout. The Pacific Highway forms the northern and southern legs of the
intersection while Wyong Road forms the eastern and western legs. The roundabout
provides a main connection between the F3 freeway and The Entrance, carrying about
52,000 vehicle movements per day in total, 34,800 vehicles on Wyong Road and 29,900
vehicles on the Pacific Highway.
The Pacific Highway to the south of Wyong Road between Ourimbah and Tuggerah was
declassified in April 2010 from State road, and is now a local road under the care of
Wyong Shire Council. The key features of the project include:
Replacement of the existing roundabout with a set of traffic signals to enable better
management of the traffic volumes at this intersection.
A new rail overbridge over the Main Northern Railway Line to accommodate
eastbound movements along Wyong Road. The existing Tuggerah Rail Overbridge
will accommodate all westbound movements, including turning lanes to the Pacific
highway (north).
Widening of the intersection to accommodate extra lanes in all four directions and tie
in with the recently completed Pacific Highway Upgrade, Tuggerah Straight, north of
the intersection at Anzac Road.
At-grade pedestrian crossings on all four legs of the intersection.
Extension of the existing pedestrian underpass including improvement of the general
amenity of the underpass facility.
Extension of the pedestrian/cyclist shared path network to improve off-road
pedestrian/cyclist connections to adjacent areas including: Tuggerah Railway Station,
Tuggerah Supa Centa, Tuggerah Business Park and Westfield Shopping Centre.
The upgrade of the intersection of Wyong Road and Gavenlock Road to incorporate
an additional left turn slip lane into Gavenlock Road (southbound).
Retaining walls on: the northern side of Wyong Road (east and west of the
intersection), the southern side of Wyong Road (east of the intersection) and the
western side of Pacific Highway (north of the intersection).
Relocation of underground and overhead utilities to accommodate the proposed
works.

The current 80% concept design drawings for the bridge widening and retaining walls are
included in Appendix B. The key structural and civil components of the project where
geotechnical investigations have been targeted include the following:
Retaining Walls:
- RW-A: reinforced Concrete L Shaped Wall and associated footprint for
embankment. Up to 5.0 m in height and 380 m in length.
-
RW-B1 A, B1-B and RW-B2, Reinforced earth wall and associated footprint for
embankment. Up to 10 m in height, 80 and 260 and 30 m in length respectively.
RW-D: L Shaped Wall and associated footprint for embankment. Up to 3.0 m in

height and 110 m in length.
RW-C: Cast in-situ or precast wall supported on bored piles and associated
footprint for embankment. Up to 4.0 m in height and 80 m in length
Proposed rail over-bridge and abutments. Including a proposed precast Super T

Girder bridge, 4 Spans (13.6 to 27.8 m).

3. Background review
3.1. Sources of information
A review of the available background information relevant to the project (provided by
RMS) and published maps has been undertaken to assess the likely ground conditions in
the vicinity of the proposed works. The information obtained for this review was used to
support the assessment and interpretation of the geotechnical field investigation results
specifically carried out for this project. Background geotechnical information reviewed
included:
Soil Landscape and Geology Maps including:

-
Gosford Lake Macquarie 1:100 000 Geological Series Sheet 9131 & 9231,
provisional first edition 2003 and Notes (GSNSW, 2003).
Gosford Lake Macquarie 1:100 000 Soil Landscape Sheet 9131 - 9231, first
edition 1993 and Notes (Murphy, 1993).
Australian Soil Resource Information System (CSIRO, 2006).
NSW Natural Resource Atlas (DNR, 2012).
RMS Pavement Design Reports including:

-
Pavement Design Report: Tuggerah Intersection Improvement Pavement

Investigation, Hunter Region Geotechnical Services, Report No. 2523/01 (RMS,
2006).
Pavement Design Report: Tuggerah Intersection Improvement Stage 2 East of

Rail Over Bridge, Hunter Region Geotechnical Services, Report No. 2523/02
(RMS, 2008).
DMR Drawings - Bridge over Main Northern Railway Line near Tuggerah, Registration
Number: 0335 505 BC 0914, Sheet 1 to 4 (DMR, 1984).
The document references are included in Section 7.0, with select information from these
references relevant to the project included in Appendix B.

3.2. Soils and geology

An understanding of the soils and geology for the area surrounding the Pacific Highway
and Wyong Road intersection has been based on the 1:100 000 geological map published
by the NSW Geological Survey for Gosford Lake Macquarie and the 1:100 000 soil
landscapes of the Gosford Lake Macquarie map published by Soil Conservation Service
of NSW. Based on this mapping, the Woodburys Bridge and Wyong Soil Landscape soil
landscape units are located within the project area and are expected to be underlain by
the Tuggerah Formation which belongs to the Clifton Sub-Group Formation of early
Triassic geological age (about 250 million years ago).
A description of the geological formations and soil landscapes underlying the project are
provided in Table 3.1and illustrated in Appendix B (Figure B1). These units were
confirmed during the geotechnical field investigations.
Figure 3.1 geology extract (GSNSW, 2003)
PROJECT
LOCATION

Table 3.1 Soil and Geological Units
Unit
Description
(wo) Woodburys Bridge

(Residual soil)
The Woodburys Bridge soil landscape is characterised by gently undulating rises

to rolling low hills with local relief less than 80 metres and slope gradients less
than 20 percent. Landforms include broad crests, long and gently inclined slopes,
and narrow drainage lines. There are two main types of soils within this unit that
include deep red podzolic soils with some soloths in poorly drained areas on
claystone bedrock and shallow to moderately deep yellow podzolic soils on
sandstone bedrock.
(wy) Wyong
(Alluvial deposit)
The Wyong soil landscape is characterised by broad poorly drained deltaic flood
plains and alluvial flats of Quaternary sediments with local relief less than ten
metres and slope gradients less than three percent. Landforms include meander
scrolls, oxbows, and swamps. Soils within this unit typically include brownish black
pedal loam overlying mottled brownish grey clay. Occasionally the associated soil
material bleached greyish yellow brown to dull yellow orange sandy clay loam
occurs at the interface between materials. Splays and lenses of sand can occur in
the soil profile.
(Rnu) Tuggerah
Formation
The Tuggerah formation is primarily a lower sequence in the Clifton subgroup
from the Early Triassic Period. It is comprised of red, green, and grey shale and
quartz-lithic sandstone with minor claystones and conglomerate. The Clifton subgroup forms part of the Narrabeen group from Triassic Period of the Mesozoic
Era.
3.3. Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS) assessment

Acid sulfate soils (ASS) are soils and sediments containing iron sulphides that, when
disturbed and exposed to oxygen, generate sulfuric acid and toxic quantities of aluminium
and other heavy metals. The sulfuric acid and heavy metals are produced in forms that
can be readily released into the environment, with potential adverse effects on the natural
and built environment and human health. The majority of ASS are formed by natural
processes under specific environmental conditions. This generally limits their occurrence
to low lying sections of coastal floodplains, rivers and creeks where surface elevations are
typically less than about 5m AHD.
A review of the online ASS maps (Australian Soil Resource Information System, CSIRO,
2006) for the project area was undertaken to assess the risk of encountering ASS along
the intersection and upgrade alignment. Mapping indicates that the likelihood of ASS is
considered Low probability. However, acid sulfate soils have been encountered with
previous projects in low lying areas (similar to areas of this alignment) to the north and
north east of the site.
ASS testing undertaken as part of the project (refer to Section 5.1.2), did indicate that
there was a presence for Potential Acid Sulfate Soils (PASS), within the lower lying
alluvial soil units.

3.4. Groundwater
The NSW Department of Natural Resources natural resource atlas (DNR, 2012) provides
a database of registered groundwater bores within NSW. A search of the groundwater
bore database identified two (2) groundwater bores with available information located
within a 500 metre radius of the project site. Table 3.2 outlines a summary of the
groundwater bore information available from the natural resources atlas.
Table 3.2 Summary of groundwater bores
Location
ID
GW04942
7
GW20052
0
Depth
(m)
36.60
61.00
Standing
water level
(m bgl)
4.00
Approx.
distance
from site
(m)
220
270
Purpose
Lithology
Domestic
0.00 1.60 Clay

1.60 7.70 Sandstone soft
7.70 9.70 Clay
11.50 13.00 Clay
17.00 36.60 Shale
Domestic
0.00 0.50 Soil

0.50 2.00 Clay
2.00 16.50 Sandstone
16.50 24.00 Shale (red)
24.00 27.00 Sandstone (grey)
27.00 31.00 Shale (red)
31.00 39.00 Sandstone (to shale, green)
39.00 43.00 Shale (red)
43.00 61.00 Sandstone (grey)
Note: (1) m bgl = Metres below ground level
3.5. Existing Rail Overbridge Drawings

Drawings for the existing bridge over the Main Northern Railway line are included in
Appendix B and referenced above (DMR, 1984). Based on these drawings, founding
levels (Contract Levels) for the existing rail overbridge were designed at between RL
10.0m AHD and RL14.0m AHD, likely founded on rock. The drawings indicate 400mm
square precast concrete driven piles were proposed. Work as Executed information was
not provided for the driven piles.
Four relevant boreholes within the footprint of the existing bridge pier and abutment
locations were included on Sheets 3 and 4 of the drawing set. Detailed borehole logs were
not provided, however Standard Penetration testing information is included which
indicates firm clay soils in the upper soil horizons, grading to stiff to very stiff soils with
depth, with weathered to competent rock encountered at the depths as summarised in

Table 3.3.
Table 3.3 Summary of borehole rock levels

Borehole ID
Surface Level (m AHD)
Depth to top of Rock (m)
Top of Rock (mAHD)
Bore 1
4.5
17.5
- 13.0
Bore 2
3.9
17.0
- 13.1
Bore 6
4.8
18.8
- 14.0
Bore 7
4.9
18.8
- 13.9
Note: (1) m AHD = metres Australian Height Datum
3.6. Previous geotechnical investigations

3.6.1.
RMS pavement investigation: 2523/01
RMS conducted a pavement investigation at the intersection between HW10 the Pacific
Highway and MR335 Wyong Road, Tuggerah from 12 September 2006 to 13 September
2006. The investigation was undertaken to determine the subsurface conditions and
provide recommended pavement designs for the proposed intersection improvements.
The investigation consisted of thirteen (13) test holes with Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
(DCP) tests, seventeen (17) Asphalt Concrete (AC) cores, detailed pavement logging, and
pavement sampling. The test holes were excavated using a 400 mm auger mounted on a
backhoe with DCP testing conducted in the test holes where sub-grade conditions
permitted. The investigation location plan is presented in Appendix B.
The RMS investigation results are outlined in Table 3.4 and summarised as follows:
The existing pavement surface condition is variable, ranging from fair condition in
most areas to poor condition at roundabouts.
The AC thickness from the cored samples ranged from 60mm to 235mm with typical
thickness from 60mm to 110mm. The AC condition was generally described as fair
except where the AC was thinnest. In these areas it was described as poor.
Fill materials encountered in the pavement were variable but typically consisted of
high strength silty and clayey gravels and medium strength sandy silts and clays with
pockets of low strength/high swell clays. The DCP results indicated that the fill
material was generally well compacted and of high strength in-situ.
Subgrade conditions also varied considerably with materials encountered including
dense silty sand, low strength silty clay, inferred zones of low compaction and/or high
moisture content from DCP results.

A design CBR of five percent was recommended for the proposed intersection
improvements.
Table 3.4 Summary of pavement investigation 2523/01 from 2006
Laboratory Test Quantity
Location ID
Test
Hole
AC
Core
DCP
MC
PSD
Atterberg
Limits
MDD/OMC
CBR
ASS
2523.01
2523.02
2523.03
2523.04
2523.05
2523.06
2523.07
2523.08
2523.09
2523.10
2523.11
2523.12
2523.13
2523.14
2523.15
2523.16
2523.17
Note: (1) AC Asphalt Concrete; DCP Dynamic Cone Penetrometer; MC Moisture Content; PSD Particle Size
Distribution; MDD Maximum Dry Density; OMC Optimum Moisture Content; CBR California Bearing Ratio; ASS Acid
Sulfate Soil
3.6.2.
RMS pavement investigation 2523/02
RMS conducted a pavement investigation for the proposed embankment widening located
east of the rail over bridge at the intersection between HW10 the Pacific Highway and
MR335 Wyong Road, Tuggerah on 12 February 2008. The investigation was undertaken
to determine the subsurface conditions and provide recommended pavement designs for
the proposed intersection improvements.
The investigation consisted of four (4) test holes with DCP tests, six (6) AC cores, detailed
pavement logging, and pavement sampling. The test holes were excavated using a
450mm auger mounted on a backhoe with DCP testing conducted in the test holes where
subgrade conditions permitted. The investigation location plan is presented in Appendix
B. The RMS investigation results are outlined in Table 3.5 and summarised as follows:
10
The existing pavement condition encountered was described as fair to good.

AC cored thickness from recovered samples ranged from 245mm to 265mm and was
described as fair to good condition.
Fill material encountered consisted of gravely sand, clayey sand and sandy clay with
low plasticity and CBR values ranging from 11 to 14 percent. The DCP results
indicated the fill material was well compacted.
The embankment foundation materials/subgrade materials consisted of up to 650mm
of silty and sandy clay fill over silty clay. The DCP and hand penetrometer results
indicated these materials were generally stiff up to 2m depth.
A design CBR of five percent was recommended for the intersection improvements.
Table 3.5 Summary of pavement investigation 2523/02 from 2008

Laboratory Test Quantity
Location ID
Test
Hole
AC
Core
DCP
MC
PSD
Atterberg
Limits
MDD/OMC
CBR
ASS
2523.201
2523.202
2523.203
2523.204
2523.205
2523.206
Note: (1) AC Asphalt Concrete; DCP Dynamic Cone Penetrometer; MC Moisture Content; PSD
Particle Size Distribution; MDD Maximum Dry Density; OMC Optimum Moisture Content; CBR California
Bearing Ratio; ASS Acid Sulfate Soil.
3.7. Site visit and inspection

A site inspection of the intersection and approaches upgrade alignment was undertaken
by Scott Raynsford (Principal Geotechnical Engineer), David Andrew (Geotechnical
Engineer), and Amanda Hunter (Environmental Scientist) from SKM on Tuesday 24
January 2012 to assess the general site conditions, access issues, traffic management
requirements, contamination issues and gain an appreciation of the site geological and
topography features to assist in this assessment and planned site investigation phase.
Results of the site inspection were used to develop a preliminary ground model and
develop a geotechnical site investigation plan which was subject to an Environmental
Assessment (SKM, 2012b) and an Environmental Management Plan (SKM, 2012c) being
prepared and approved by RMS. Access to private land was also a key consideration in
developing the site investigation plan. Select photographs from the site inspection are
presented on Plates 1 to 12 in Appendix B.

11
4. Scope of geotechnical investigations

4.1. General
Field geotechnical investigations were undertaken between 09 June 2012 and 09 August
2012 and involved the following components:
Borehole drilling.
Piezometer installation for groundwater sampling and monitoring of groundwater
levels.
Cone penetration tests (CPTu) with dissipation/vane shear testing.
Test pit excavation.
Dynamic cone penetrometer testing.
Geotechnical laboratory testing.
Table 4.1 provides a summary of the field investigations conducted. The location of field
investigation works are displayed on the site investigation location plan provided in
Appendix A.
Table 4.1 Summary of geotechnical investigations

Investigation method
No. of investigations
Description
Borehole
11
Assessment of sub surface

conditions for proposed alignment
structures.
Cone Penetration Test
12
Assessment of soil strength/relative

density for deep alluvial deposits.
Test Pit
Assessment and sampling of

subgrade conditions
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
Assessment of subgrade consistency
4.2. Planning and approval

Prior to the commencement of the geotechnical investigation, SKM was required to
prepare a number of project specific and quality assurance plans for review and approval
by RMS and Railcorp. The geotechnical investigations were carried out in accordance
with the following documents:
Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335 Intersection and Approaches
Upgrade: Report on Existing Geotechnical Information and Detailed Geotechnical
Investigations Proposal Plan (SKM, 2012a).
Upgrade: Geotechnical Safety Plan (SKM, 2012e).

12
Upgrade: Geotechnical Investigations EMP (SKM, 2012c).
Upgrade: Review of Environmental Factors (SKM, 2012b).
Upgrade: Method Statement Geotechnical Site Investigation in Rail Corridor (SKM,
2012f).
4.3. Borehole drilling

Two (2) boreholes were undertaken between 09 June 2012 and 10 June 2012 within the
rail corridor during a RailCorp track possession. The boreholes were drilled by Terratest
Pty Ltd using a combination of a truck mounted Edson 3000 drill rig (BH08) and a track
mounted Comacchio Geo 205 drill rig (BH09). Non Destructive Drilling (NDD) using a
Vacmaster provided by Terratest Pty Ltd was employed for both boreholes up to a
maximum depth of 1.5m below natural ground level to eliminate the risk of underground
services. The boreholes were then drilled to depths between 25.3m and 26.0m.
Nine (9) boreholes were undertaken between 23 July 2012 and 01 August 2012 by
Terratest Pty Ltd using a track mounted drill rig (Comacchio Geo 305). The boreholes
were drilled to depths between 6.5 m and 26.9 m. Three (3) monitoring wells were
installed, with a summary of the construction details presented in Section 4.3.1. The
borehole investigation locations are illustrated on the site investigation location plan
contained in Appendix A.
The boreholes were logged on-site under full time supervision by an SKM Geotechnical
Engineer who was responsible for locating the boreholes and selecting locations for in-situ
testing and sampling. Where possible, water levels in the boreholes were recorded during
the drilling process and are displayed on the borehole logs. Table 4.2 outlines a summary
of the borehole investigation locations and investigation depths.
Boreholes were advanced through overburden soils by a combination of 110mm diameter
continuous solid flight auger with a V-shaped or Tungsten Carbide (TC) bit attachment to
refusal and washboring techniques. Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) was undertaken
at regular intervals within the soil (typically 1m to 1.5m) to assess the in-situ strength.
Steel casing was advanced to the top of rock and used to support the overburden soil
during rock coring.
Boreholes were then continued through the rock profile using triple tube NMLC diamond
coring techniques. The rock core recovered was logged and photographed by an SKM
geotechnical engineer in accordance with current RMS methods and Australian Standards
(SAI, 1993). The borehole logs were prepared using SKMs gINT database system and

13
are presented in Appendix C in combination with photographs and explanatory notes for
geotechnical terms.
Environmental controls were implemented during the drilling program in accordance with
the project specific EMP (SKM, 2012c) and utilised a combination of geotextile filter cloth
and geofabric spill absorbents. The drill cuttings and fluid were circulated during the
investigation and contained in the drilling tank. At the completion of the investigation, the
borehole was reinstated using the generated spoil and cuttings while the drilling fluids
were removed from site and disposed of at a licensed facility.
Table 4.2 - Summary of borehole locations and investigation depths

Location ID
Total depth (m)
Easting
Northing
Reduced level (m AHD)
BH01
12.45
352801.9
6313404.1
3.98
BH02
10.00
352833.7
6313309.9
4.79
BH03
6.45
352634.4
6313309.2
12.36
BH04
6.45
352714.3
6313300.7
11.10
BH05
10.45
352766.6
6313297.4
8.22
BH07
22.10
352861.7
6313275.8
5.08
BH08
26.00
352874.7
6313232.3
4.77
BH09
25.30
352889.9
6313212.6
5.02
BH10
26.90
352925.2
6313181.0
5.03
BH11
23.95
352984.7
6313084.4
4.58
BH12
7.45
353032.1
6313017.1
4.36
4.3.1.
Monitoring wells
Three (3) boreholes (BH07, BH10, and BH11) were selected to have monitoring wells
installed for sampling, groundwater measurement purposes and assessment of risks
associated with elevated groundwater levels and groundwater aggressivity.
Each well was constructed using standard uPVC Class 18, 50mm diameter, flush jointed,
screwed coupling casing and screens with 0.4mm slots. The screen was placed towards
the bottom of the each well. The screened section was then backfilled with 1 2mm
graded sand to approximately 0.5m above the screened section. This was then overlain
by a bentonite seal and the well was then backfilled. A gatic cover or monument was
installed at the surface.
The monitoring well construction details are summarised in Table 4.3 below and are
presented as monitoring well construction logs in Appendix C.

14
Table 4.3 - Monitoring well construction details
Location ID
Surface RL
(m AHD)
TOC RL
(m AHD)
Total
Drilled
Depth (m)
Screen Depth
Interval (m)
Sand Pack
Depth Interval
(m)
Date
Constructed
BH07
5.077
5.427
22.10
14.65 20.65
14.15 22.10
26.07.2012
BH10
5.025
4.975
26.90
20.90 26.90
20.40 26.90
01.08.2012
BH11
4.582
4.532
23.95
8.00 14.00
7.50 23.95
30.07.2012
4.4. Cone Penetration Testing (CPTu) and Shear vane testing (Su)
Cone penetration testing with pore pressure measurement was undertaken at select
locations targeting the intersection and approaches upgrade for the project. Twelve (12)
CPTu were conducted to depths from 6.6m to 21.4m below existing ground level to
assess any potential layers of compressible soils and relative density of alluvium units
underlying the project site.
The testing was undertaken by Network Geotechnics Pty Ltd using a Geoprobe 6625CPT
track mounted rig with a 35mm diameter rod and conical tip that was pushed vertically into
the soil profile to provide a continuous profile. Soil characteristics including cone
resistance (qc), sleeve friction (fs), and pore pressure (u) were measured every 0.02m by
load cells and strain gauges. A piezocone was used for all CPTu tests to allow
measurement of porewater pressure and undertake dissipation testing.
In-situ vane shear testing was completed at two (2) CPTu investigation locations using
equipment mounted on the Geoprobe 6625CPT to provide an indication of the peak in-situ
undrained shear strength. A remolded undrained shear strength test was also undertaken
upon completion of the initial vane shear test.
Table 4.4 outlines a summary of the CPTu investigation locations and investigation
depths and the CPT results sheets are included in Appendix C.
Table 4.4 - Summary of CPTu investigation locations
Location
ID
Total
depth
(m)
Dissipation
test
undertaken
Vane shear
undertaken
Easting
Northing
Reduced
level
(m AHD)
CPT01
9.38
No
No
352618.3
6313538.4
4.36
CPT02
7.12
No
No
352753.1
6313433.4
4.11
CPT03
11.96
No
No
352799.8
6313403.6
3.87
CPT04
13.60
No
No
352821.5
6313416.9
3.82
CPT05
15.80
No
Yes
352866.8
6313386.7
5.35
CPT06
10.72
No
No
352832.9
6313312.8
4.93
CPT07
11.58
No
No
352793.7
6313141.3
5.49

15
Location
ID
Total
depth
(m)
Dissipation
test
undertaken
Vane shear
undertaken
Easting
Northing
Reduced
level
(m AHD)
CPT08
6.60
No
No
352863.3
6313273.4
5.01
CPT08A
8.90
No
No
352863.9
6313272.8
5.01
CPT09
20.08
Yes
No
352930.3
6313167.5
5.04
CPT10
21.35
Yes
No
352984.0
6313083.0
4.58
CPT11
19.04
No
Yes
353032.5
6313016.1
4.25
4.5. Test pits

The test pit excavations were carried out on 09 August 2012 for sampling of sub-grade
materials and determination of excavation conditions and any unsuitable material. A total
of three (3) test pits were excavated using a rubber tracked Kubota U45-3 excavator to
depths ranging from 2.50m to 3.20m and terminated at the machine limit of reach or limit
of sidewall stability. A summary of the test pit investigation depths and locations are
provided in Table 4.5.
The test pits were logged on-site under full time supervision by an SKM Geotechnical
Engineer who was responsible for locating test pits, sampling disturbed material and
photographing the sub-surface profile. Test pit logs, photographs and explanatory notes
for geotechnical terms are presented in Appendix C.
Each test pit was backfilled on completion with the excavated material usually replaced in
the same sequence as it was excavated. The material was compacted using the
excavator bucket and track rolled with each test pit left slightly mounded to limit future
settlement of the ground surface.
Dynamic cone penetrometer testing in accordance with AS 1289.6.3.2 was undertaken
adjacent to each test pit to assess the in-situ strength/relative density of the sub-surface
soils. The number of blows was recorded for successive penetrations of 100mm up to
depths of 3.20m or prior refusal. Results from the DCP tests are shown on the test pit logs
and the result sheets contained in Appendix C.
Table 4.5 - Test pit locations and investigation depths

Location ID
Total depth (m)
Easting
Northing
Reduced level (m
AHD)
TP01
3.30
352623.938
6313536.2
4.40
TP02
3.20
352754.253
6313431.9
4.30
TP03
2.50
352803.348
6313404.7
3.92

16
4.6. Laboratory testing

Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil and rock samples retrieved from
boreholes and test pits to assess the engineering characteristics of the material. The
samples including undisturbed, disturbed, bulk, and environmental soil samples and
recovered rock core were submitted to selected laboratories for the type and quantity of
testing as outlined in Table 4.6.
Laboratory testing was performed using NATA registered laboratories in accordance with
the relevant RMS test method or Australian Standard, where no RMS test method applied.
A combination of SGS Australia Pty Ltd and Envirolab Services Pty Ltd were used with the
subsequent laboratory test certificates presented in Appendix D.
Table 4.6 Summary of laboratory testing

Test
Test Method
Quantity
Notes
Sample Type
Moisture content
RMS T120
10
General classification of soils

for material assessment
Disturbed, Bulk,
SPT
Particle size
distribution
RMS T106

Bulk, SPT
Particle size
distribution
(Hydrometer)
RMS T107

Undisturbed,
Bulk
Atterberg limits
RMS T108/109
14

Undisturbed,
Disturbed, Bulk,
SPT
California Bearing
Ratio (CBR)
RMS T117
Subgrade material
assessment for pavement
design purposes
Bulk
Maximum dry
density/optimum
moisture content
RMS T111

for earthwork material
assessment
Bulk
One dimensional
consolidation
AS 1289 6.6.1
Consolidation properties of soil
Undisturbed
Triaxial
compression test
AS 1289 6.4.2
Strength properties of soil
Undisturbed
Acid sulfate soil
Rayment/ Higginson
22
Acid sulfate soil assessment
SPT, Disturbed
pH, sulphate (S04),

chloride (Cl)
AS 1012.20
Aggressivity
Disturbed
Resistivity
AS 1289.4.4.1/RMS
Resistivity of soil
Disturbed
Conductivity
APHA 2510B
Conductivity of soil
Disturbed
Point load index
RMS T223
20
Rock mass strength

assessment
Core
Uniaxial
AS 4133.4.2
Rock mass strength
Core
Geotechnical

17
Test
Test Method
Quantity
Compressive
Strength (UCS)
Notes
Sample Type
assessment
pH, sulphate (S04),

chloride (Cl)
AS 1012.20
Groundwater aggressivity
Water
Conductivity
APHA 2510B
Groundwater conductivity
Water
4.7. Survey
On completion of the field investigations, the position and reduced level for each test
location was surveyed using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. The survey
was conducted using a Real Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS with base station, to an accuracy
of +/- 0.05m. The positions were recorded with reference to Map Grid Australia 56 (MGA
56) and the reduced level with reference to Australian Height Datum (AHD). The survey of
geotechnical investigation locations was undertaken by ADW Johnson Pty Ltd who were
engaged by RMS.
The surveyed positions of the field investigation locations are annotated on the respective
engineering log sheets contained in Appendix C and are shown on the site investigation
location plan in Appendix A.

18
5. Result of geotechnical investigations

5.1. Laboratory testing
5.1.1.
Mechanical
Soil classification
Fourteen (14) undisturbed, disturbed, SPT and bulk samples collected during the field
investigations were analysed in the laboratory for general soil classification and plasticity.
The results are displayed in Table 5.1 and the laboratory test certificates are presented in
Appendix D.
Table 5.1 - Summary of soil classification test results
Location
ID
Depth (m)
Material
Moisture
content (%)
Liquid
limit (%)
Plastic
limit (%)
Plasticity
Index (%)
BH01
5.00
Silty Clay
61
20
41
BH03
1.70 2.50
Clayey Sand
14.0
26
10
16
BH04
3.50
Silty Clay
17.6
63
19
44
BH10
2.50
Clayey Sand
11.8
25
15
10
BH10
14.50
Silty Clay
31.0
49
18
31
BH11
14.50
Silty Clay
55
20
35
BH11
17.50
Silty Clay
52
24
28
BH12
3.00
Silty Clay
56
17
39
BH12
7.00
Clayey Sand
16.7
24
11
13
TP01
0.60
Gravelly Clay
11.6
32
17
15
TP01
1.30
Silty Clayey Sandy Gravel
10.3
35
10
25
TP02
0.60
Gravelly Silty Clay
17.4
35
13
22
TP02
1.90
Silty Clayey Sand
22.3
25
15
10
TP03
1.30
Silty Clayey Sand
19.6
30
13
17
Particle size distribution
A total of Nine (9) undisturbed, SPT, and bulk samples collected during the field
investigations were subjected to laboratory analysis for particle size distribution. The
results are outlined in Table 5.2 with the laboratory test certificates contained in
Appendix D.

19
Table 5.2 - Summary of particle size distribution test results
Location ID
Depth (m)
Material
Clay (%)
Silt (%)
Sand (%)
Gravel (%)
BH01
5.00
Silty Clay
52
45
BH03
1.70 2.50
Clayey Sand
33
58
BH10
7.00
Sand
10
90
BH11
14.50
Silty Clay
49
49
BH11
17.50
Silty Clay
41
58
BH12
3.00
Silty Clay
52
22
26
TP01
1.30
28
17
24
31
TP02
1.90
Silty Clayey Sand
19
16
62
TP03
1.30
Silty Clayey Sand
18
20
62
California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
A total of four (4) bulk samples collected from the test pit excavations and borehole drilling
during field investigations were subjected to CBR testing that evaluated compaction
properties and the soaked CBR (10 day). The soil samples were compacted (standard
compaction) to 100 percent dry density ratio at the optimum moisture content of the
material. The results of the CBR tests are displayed in Table 5.4, with the corresponding
laboratory test certificates contained in Appendix D.
Table 5.4 - Summary of CBR test results

CBR (%)
Location
ID
Depth (m)
Material
OMC
(%)
MDD
(t/m3)
2.5 mm
5.0 mm
Swell
(%)
BH03
1.70 2.50
Clayey Sand
10.5
2.02
25.0
30.0
0.1
TP01
1.30
11.0
1.95
3.0
3.0
2.0
TP02
1.90
Silty Clayey Sand
13.5
1.82
6.0
8.0
0.4
TP03
1.30
Silty Clayey Sand
13.0
1.88
5.0
6.0
0.3
Note: (1) OMC = Optimum Moisture Content

(2) MDD = Maximum Dry Density
The results outlined in Table 5.4 indicate that the subgrade conditions are variable and
reflective of the soil type sampled. An assessment of the pavement subgrade conditions is
contained in the Geotechnical Design Report (SKM, 2012d).
Shear strength
Three (3) consolidated undrained triaxial compression tests were undertaken on

undisturbed thin wall tube samples from the field investigations to evaluate the shear
strength parameters. Table 5.5 outlines a summary of the triaxial compression test results
and the laboratory test certificates are contained in Appendix D.
20
Table 5.5 Summary of triaxial test results
Location
ID
Depth
(m)
Material
Moisture
content (%)
Friction angle,
()
Cohesion, c
(KPa)
BH01
5.00
Silty Clay
21.4
23.0
15.1
BH11
17.50
Silty Clay
40.2
19.8
32.8
BH12
3.00
Silty Clay
24.0
23.6
18.0
Consolidation
One dimensional consolidation testing was undertaken on four (4) undisturbed thin wall
tube samples recovered during the field investigations to assess the compressibility
characteristics. The laboratory test results are outlined in Table 5.6 with the
corresponding laboratory test certificates contained in Appendix D.

21
Table 5.6 Summary of consolidation test results
Location
ID
BH01
BH11
BH11
BH12
Depth
(m)
5.00
14.50
17.50
3.00
Material
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
Load
(KPa)
Cc
25 50
Cv (m2/yr)
Mv
(KPa-1 x 10-3)
Ca
(x 10-3)
Consolidation
(%)
t50
t90
0.014
8.68
22.86
0.105
0.00
0.6
50 100
0.040
4.01
14.29
0.146
0.00
1.3
100 200
0.072
5.33
13.25
0.133
0.62
2.6
200 400
0.096
4.57
13.09
0.090
0.80
4.4
400 800
0.124
2.74
5.45
0.059
0.00
6.7
800 200
5.3
200 - 50
3.7
12.5 25
0.006
17.50
23.45
0.079
0.00
0.1
25 50
0.043
2.90
17.63
0.265
0.60
0.8
50 100
0.100
2.71
9.19
0.310
1.02
2.3
100 200
0.166
3.56
16.12
0.261
1.47
4.9
200 400
0.202
1.09
4.20
0.163
2.36
8.0
400 800
0.328
0.65
0.92
0.136
4.35
13.0
800 200
11.3
200 - 50
8.8
12.5 25
0.014
2.11
13.87
0.172
0.00
0.2
25 50
0.037
1.36
4.84
0.225
0.00
0.8
50 100
0.083
1.64
2.37
0.251
1.65
2.0
100 200
0.153
1.20
2.18
0.234
2.24
4.3
200 400
0.246
0.79
1.44
0.193
3.14
8.0
400 800
0.335
0.69
1.00
0.137
3.67
13.0
800 200
11.8
200 - 50
9.7
25 50
0.015
2.63
9.50
0.109
0.00
0.3
50 100
0.041
6.15
23.26
0.143
0.00
1.0
100 200
0.079
4.64
16.66
0.141
0.00
2.4
200 400
0.112
3.02
8.18
0.101
0.00
4.3
400 800
0.140
2.67
6.03
0.064
0.00
6.8
800 200
6.5
200 - 50
5.1
Rock strength
Rock core samples retrieved from the boreholes were subject to point load index testing
and Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) testing to classify the strength of the rock
22
units encountered. A total of twenty (20) core samples were subjected to diametral and
axial point load index tests (orientated perpendicular and along the core axis respectively)
and UCS testing. The laboratory results for the rock strength testing are outlined in Table
5.7 with the laboratory test certificates presented in Appendix D.
Table 5.7 - Summary of rock strength test results
Location ID
Depth (m)
Material
Axial point load,

Is(50) (MPa)
Diametral point
load, Is(50) (MPa)
UCS
(MPa)
BH07
10.83 10.97
Claystone
0.12
0.17
BH07
15.00 15.14
Claystone
0.10
0.12
BH07
17.80 17.92
Sandstone
0.34
0.47
BH07
18.62 18.87
Sandstone
0.84
0.64
20.2
BH07
21.06 21.26
Claystone
0.78
0.91
BH08
20.73 20.87
Sandstone
1.02
0.95
BH08
21.61 21.81
Sandstone
2.46
1.76
35.6
BH08
22.78 22.93
Sandstone
2.21
1.52
BH08
23.82 24.00
Sandstone
2.78
1.54
BH08
24.85 25.00
Claystone
0.41
0.51
BH09
19.00 19.17
Sandstone
0.15
0.22
BH09
21.43 21.60
Sandstone
2.31
2.08
BH09
22.73 22.90
Sandstone
0.94
0.97
BH09
23.79 24.00
Claystone
0.43
0.43
BH09
24.72 24.92
Claystone
0.54
0.37
6.6
BH10
19.47 19.65
Claystone
0.11
0.15
BH10
21.75 21.95
Claystone
0.07
0.13
BH10
23.68 23.81
Sandstone
0.81
0.85
BH10
24.06 24.22
Sandstone
0.72
0.17
BH10
25.08 25.32
Sandstone
0.58
0.49
22.5
5.1.2.
Chemical
Aggressivity
A total of six (6) soil samples collected from the field investigations were tested in the
laboratory for aggressivity using pH, chloride and sulphate content, resistivity, and
conductivity. The samples were tested at various locations and depths corresponding to
buried concrete and steel structures that include piles and bridge abutments. The results
of soil aggressivity testing are outlined in Table 5.8.

23
Table 5.8 Soil aggressivity test results
Location
ID
Depth (m)
pH
Chloride
Content
(mg/kg)
Sulphate Content
(mg/kg)
Resistivity
( m)
Conductivity
(S/cm)
BH01
6.00
6.3
25
16
190
51
BH02
7.00
6.2
130
36
76
130
BH05
4.00
6.5
110
33
120
84
BH07
5.50
5.9
170
110
55
180
BH10
10.00
4.3
20
1200
24
430
BH12
2.00
4.9
21
89
180
55
The results indicate variable pH values (4.3 to 6.5), low chloride (20 to 170 mg/kg) and
sulphate (16 to 1200 mg/kg), variable resistivity values (24 to 190 m), and conductivity
values (51 to 430 s/cm) for the soil samples tested.
A total of three (3) water samples collected from monitoring wells installed during the field
investigations were tested in the laboratory for aggressivity using pH, chloride and
sulphate content, and conductivity. Following well development, a water sample was
retrieved from each piezometer to assess the influence of groundwater on buried concrete
and steel structures. The results of the water aggressivity testing are outlined in Table 5.9.
Table 5.9 Water aggressivity test results

Location ID
pH
Chloride Content (mg/kg)
Sulphate Content (mg/kg)
Conductivity (S/cm)
BH07
7.2
260
64
1500
BH10
7.2
250
51
1600
BH11
5.9
34
12
160
The results indicate variable pH values (5.9 to 7.2), very low to low chloride (34 to 260
mg/kg) and sulphate (12 to 64 mg/kg) and variable conductivity values (160 to 1600 m)
for the water samples tested.
Acid sulfate soil (ASS)
For the preliminary screening of acid sulfate soil (ASS) at the project alignment, selected
disturbed and SPT samples of saturated alluvium retrieved from the boreholes were
tested in the laboratory for field pH screening. Table 5.10 presents the laboratory test
results from the ASS screening and the laboratory test certificates are displayed in
Appendix D.

24
Table 5.10 Summary of acid sulfate soil screening

Location ID
Depth (m)
pHF
pHFOX
pH
Reaction Rate
BH01
1.00
5.0
3.8
1.2
Slight
BH01
3.00
5.1
3.7
1.4
Slight
BH02
3.00
5.7
3.5
2.2
Slight
BH02
4.00
4.3
4.1
0.2
Slight
BH02
5.00
5.1
2.8
2.3
Slight
BH02
5.50
5.8
4.3
1.5
Slight
BH07
4.00
5.3
4.0
1.3
Slight
BH08
1.80
5.6
3.0
2.6
Slight
BH08
2.00
5.3
3.4
1.9
Moderate
BH08
3.30
5.5
3.5
2.0
Slight
BH08
5.00
5.7
3.7
2.0
Slight
BH09
3.00
5.0
4.2
0.8
Slight
BH09
4.10
4.9
3.4
1.5
Slight
BH09
5.30
4.6
3.8
0.8
Slight
BH09
10.50
5.2
4.1
1.1
Slight
BH10
5.50
5.3
1.5
3.8
Vigorous
BH10
8.50
5.4
1.5
3.9
Vigorous
BH11
2.00
4.9
3.3
1.6
Vigorous
BH11
11.50
6.2
1.5
4.7
Moderate
BH11
23.50
6.1
2.1
4.0
Slight
BH12
1.70
4.6
2.7
1.9
Slight
BH12
4.70
5.1
3.6
1.5
Slight
Note: (1) pHF = Field pH

(2) PHFOX = Field peroxide pH
(3) pH = Change in pH
Typical indicators from screening test results for Potential Acid Sulfate Soils (PASS)
include pHFOX < 3, strong reaction rate, and a large change from pHF to pHFOX. The
screening results do show indicators for potential ASS (PASS) conditions. These samples
were selected for confirmation of ASS potential using Chromium Suite analysis. The
Chromium Suite test is an acid base accounting approach widely used for predicting net
acidity from the oxidation of sulphides present in ASS, and has the advantage of not being
subjected to significant interferences from the sulphur in either organic matter or sulfate
minerals present in the soil. The test determines net acidity by calculating the summation
25
of Potential Sulfidic Acidity (SCR), Existing Acidity (Actual Acidity [STAA] + Retained Acidity
[SNAS]) and Acid Neutralising Capacity (SANC). The results of the testing are summarised
in Table 5.11.
Table 5.11 Summary of chromium suite analysis
Location
ID
Sample
Depth
(m)
pHKCL
SCR
(%S)
STAA
(%S)
SNAS
(%S)
SANC
(%S)
Net
Acidity
(%s)
Action Criteria
BH01
1.00
4.1
<0.005
0.05
<0.005
<0.05
0.05
0.03 (exceeds action criteria)
BH01
3.00
4.1
<0.005
0.04
<0.005
<0.05
0.04
BH02
5.00
4.5
<0.005
0.03
<0.005
<0.05
0.03
BH07
4.00
4.6
<0.005
0.02
NT
<0.05
0.02
BH08
1.80
4.5
0.02
0.02
NT
<0.05
0.04
BH09
4.10
4.1
<0.005
0.04
<0.005
<0.05
0.04
BH10
5.50
4.4
0.11
0.02
0.006
<0.05
0.14
BH10
8.50
4.5
0.13
0.02
0.007
<0.05
0.15
BH11
2.00
3.8
<0.005
0.08
<0.005
<0.05
0.08
BH11
11.50
4.5
0.04
0.04
<0.005
<0.05
0.08
BH12
1.70
4.1
<0.005
0.04
<0.005
<0.05
0.05
Note: (1) Exceeds action criteria (>0.03 % S, greater than 1000 tonnes) Table 4.4 (Ahern. Et al, 1998)
(2) pHKCL = Potassium chloride pH
(3) SCR = Chromium reducible sulphur
(4) STAA = Titratable actual acidity
(5) SNAS = net acid soluble sulphur
(6) SANC = Acid neutralising capacity
(7) NT = Not tested
The results above were compared against the action criteria (ASSAG, 1998), which
indicate that there is the potential for PASS soils at the site, where most samples recorded
the net acidity and the Chromium reducible sulphur levels greater than the action criteria.
Most samples tested recorded levels greater that the action criteria outlined by Ahern et
al. Recommendations for management and handling of ASS are included under a
separate cover in the Geotechnical Design Report (SKM, 2012d) for consideration where
soils are to be disturbed below the groundwater table.
5.2.
Groundwater observations
Groundwater level measurements were undertaken at all geotechnical investigation

locations where free groundwater or seepage was observed. A summary of the
groundwater level observations recorded during the site investigations are outlined in
Table 5.12.
26
Table 5.12 Groundwater observation levels during investigations

Location ID
Surface RL
(m AHD)
Water Level (m bgl)
Water Level
(m AHD)
Measurement Date
BH01
3.978
1.20
2.778
26.07.2012
BH02
4.789
2.60
2.189
23.07.2012
BH08
4.774
1.10
3.674
09.06.2012
BH09
5.016
2.30
2.716
09.06.2012
BH10
5.025
2.10
2.925
31.07.2012
BH11
4.582
1.70
2.882
27.07.2012
BH12
4.363
2.60
1.763
27.07.2012
CPT01
4.361
1.70
2.661
03.07.2012
CPT02
4.110
1.00
3.110
03.07.2012
CPT03
3.874
0.80
3.074
03.07.2012
CPT04
3.817
0.50
3.317
03.07.2012
CPT05
5.349
1.60
3.749
03.07.2012
TP01
4.397
2.80
1.597
09.08.2012
TP02
4.302
2.10
2.202
09.08.2012
TP03
3.923
1.50
2.423
09.08.2012
Note: (1) m AHD = Metres Australian Height Datum

(2) m bgl = Metres Below Ground Level
Following piezometer installation and well development, groundwater monitoring was

undertaken at each well location to determine the groundwater level. Table 5.13 outlines
the groundwater level measurement that was observed.
Table 5.13 Monitoring well observation levels

Location ID
Surface RL
(m AHD)
TOC RL
(m AHD)
Water Level
(m bTOC)
Water Level
(m AHD)
Measurement Date
BH07
5.077
5.427
2.10
3.327
09.08.2012
BH10
5.025
4.975
1.90
3.075
09.08.2012
BH11
4.582
4.532
1.40
3.132
09.08.2012
5.3. Field testing

Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Standard penetration testing was undertaken at all borehole investigation locations in the
overburden soils. The standard penetration test results have been illustrated in Figure 5.1
against the corresponding depth.
27
SPTNValue
15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
Depth(mAHD)
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
BH01
BH02
BH03
BH04
BH05
BH07
BH08
BH09
BH10
BH11
BH12
Figure 5.1 SPT results
In-situ vane shear test
In-situ vane shear testing was undertaken at two (2) CPTu investigation locations to
assess the in-situ shear strength, provide calibration with CPTu results for development of
the geotechnical model. Table 5.14 provides a summary of the insitu vane shear test
results.
Table 5.14 Summary of in-situ vane shear test results

Location ID
Depth (m)
Shear strength (KPa)
Remoulded shear strength (KPa)
CPT05
2.00
30.36
16.66
CPT11
2.70
71.80
14.41

28
6. Geotechnical conditions
6.1.
Subsurface conditions
The geotechnical investigation for the project has been undertaken to characterise the
subsurface conditions into geotechnical units. These geotechnical units were established
from the available background geotechnical information as well as from the results of the
boreholes, CPTu, test pits and laboratory test data.
Table 6.1 outlines the geotechnical units developed for the project. The soil units have
been separated into fill, alluvial, residual soil. Rock units have been classified based on
stratigraphy, strength and weathering characteristics. The inferred subsurface profile is
presented on the geotechnical section included in Appendix F and provides the inferred
boundaries between units.
Table 6.1 Geotechnical Model
Topography
4.0 to 12.5 m AHD
Soils
(wy) Wyong (Alluvial deposits)
Geology
(Rnu) Tuggerah Formation
Unit symbol
Subsurface unit
1A
New fill/ existing

embankments
1B
Fill
Relevant
locations
Material description
N/A
New fill areas and existing embankment construction.
BH03, BH08,
BH09, TP02
Existing fill materials and topsoil. Typically firm to stiff

clay with some gravel inclusions. Limited fill was
encountered in the boreholes, predominately
localised.
Alluvial deposits (sands/silty sands)

2A
Sands/silty sand
(loose)
2B
Sands/silty sand
(medium dense)
2C
Sands/silty sand
(dense to very
dense)
Sands and silty sands. Typically loose, medium

grained, with some silt and clay banding.
BH08 BH10,
CPT01
CPT03, CPT09,
TP01 TP03
Sand and silty sand (medium dense), Typically

medium dense, medium grained with some silt and
clay lenses.
Sand/silty sand (dense to very dense), Typically
dense to very dense, medium grained with some silt
and clay lenses.
Alluvial deposits (clays/silty clays)

2D
Clays/Silts (soft to
firm)
2E
Clays/Silts (stiff)
BH01, BH10
BH12, CPT03
CPT05, CPT09
CPT11, TP03
Clays and Silts. Soft to firm, typically firm with some

localised soft areas, high plasticity with some sand
and silty sand lenses.
Clays and Silts. Typically stiff, high plasticity with
some sand and silty sand lenses.

29
2F
Clays/Silts (very
stiff to hard)
Clays and Silts. Typically very stiff to hard, high

plasticity with some sand and silty sand lenses.
Residual soil (clays/silty clays)

3A
Clays/Silty Clay
(Very stiff to hard)
, BH01 BH05,
BH07 BH10,
CPT01 CPT04
Clays and Silty Clays, typically very stiff to hard, high

plasticity, residual soil.
Bedrock
4A
Claystone
4B
Claystone
4C
Sandstone/
Siltstone
(Class V) Claystone, typically extremely low strength,

extremely to highly weathered to residual soil
material.
BH07, BH08,
BH09, BH10
(Class IV) Claystone, typically very low to low

strength, highly weathered, fractured
(Class III) Sandstone and bands of claystone,
typically medium to high strength, moderately
weathered, fractured.
Note: (1) m AHD = Metres Australian Height Datum

(2) A classification of the rock-mass has also been provided which has generally been undertaken in accordance with
the guidelines presented in Foundations on Sandstone and Shales in the Sydney Basin (Pells et al, 1998).
Interpretation of the subsurface conditions is provided under separate cover as

documented in the project Geotechnical Design Report (SKM, 2012d).
6.2.
Material properties of geotechnical units
6.2.1.
(Unit 1) Fill
The fill (Unit 1) encountered along the Pacific Highway and Wyong Road intersection and
approaches upgrade alignment was generally limited to areas adjacent to existing road,
rail corridor, and subsequent pavement structures. Fill was encountered in BH03, BH08,
BH09 and TP02 to depths between 0.60m and 1.20m and typically comprised soft to stiff
sandy and silty clays. Soil classification test results for Unit 1 are illustrated on Figure 6.2.
6.2.2.
(Unit 2) Alluvial deposits
The alluvial deposits (Unit 2) encountered across the project alignment in: BH01, BH08
BH12, CPT01CPT05, CPT09CPT11 and TP01TP03 have been assessed into six (6)
geotechnical units (2A to 2F) using soil classification and consistency properties.
Figure 6.2 illustrates a plasticity chart with the soil classification laboratory test results for
Unit 2. It can be seen that Unit 2A comprises low plasticity material with liquid limits that
varied between 25 and 35 percent and plastic limit that varied between 10 and 17 percent.
The corresponding plasticity index values ranged between 10 and 25 percent. Particle
size distribution tests on samples retrieved from Unit 2A indicate the samples comprised

30
silty clays and clayey sands with the particle size distribution curves illustrated in Figure
6.1.
Unit 2E and 2F are also outlined in Figure 6.1 and Figure 6.2, with the laboratory test
results illustrating that the units typically comprise stiff (Unit 2E) to hard (Unit 2F) high
plasticity clays and silts. The liquid limits varied between 24 and 63 percent and plastic
limit that varied between 11 and 24 percent. The subsequent plasticity index values
ranged between 13 and 44 percent.

31
Figure 6.1 - Particle size distribution test results

32
Figure 6.2 - Plasticity chart for soil classification test results
California bearing ratio tests were carried out on four (4) bulk samples retrieved from the
test pit excavations for Unit 2A. The results of the sub-grade for Unit 2A indicated CBR
values typically ranging between 3 to 6 percent and swells ranging between 0.1 to 2.0
percent. The bulk sample retrieved from BH03 reported a CBR value of 25 percent,
however, this result is not considered representative and affected by gravel inclusions.
The maximum dry density values ranged between 1.82 to 2.02 tonnes per cubic metre
and the corresponding optimum moisture content varied between 10.5 and 13.5 percent.
Results from the testing, including compaction and CBR characteristics are outlined on
Figure 6.3 and Figure 6.4.

33
2.10
MaximumDryDensity(t/m3)
2.00
1.90
1.80
1.70
1.60
1.50
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
OptimumMoistureContent(%)
Unit2A
Figure 6.3 - Summary of MDD versus OMC test results

30
25
CBR(%)
20
15
10
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Swell(%)
Unit2A
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
Figure 6.4 - Summary of CBR versus swell test results

34
The laboratory test results for the consolidated undrained triaxial compression tests
undertaken on Unit 2E are illustrated in Figure 6.5 and it shows the p q diagram for the
triaxial compression test results.
200
180
160
140
q'(KPa)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
p'(KPa)
Unit2E
Unit3A
300
350
400
450
Figure 6.5 p-q summary of triaxial results
6.2.3.
(Unit 3A) Residual soil
The residual soil (Unit 3A) encountered along the Pacific Highway and Wyong Road
intersection and approaches upgrade alignment typically comprised very stiff to hard clays
and silty clays. Residual soil was encountered in: BH01BH05, BH07BH10 and CPT01
CPT04 to depths between 2.70m and 13.80 m. Unit 3A is illustrated on the subsurface
profile contained in Appendix A.
The laboratory test results for the consolidated undrained triaxial compression tests
undertaken on Unit 3A are illustrated in Figure 6.5 and it shows the p q diagram for the
triaxial compression test results.
One dimensional consolidation testing was undertaking with the oedometer test
certificates outlined in Appendix D. Figure 6.6 and Figure 6.7 illustrate the compression
ratio and the overconsolidation ratio against depth respectively.

35
0.02
Cc/(1+e0)
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.1
0.12
0
2
4
Depth(m)
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Unit2E
Unit3A
Figure 6.6 Summary of compression ratio versus depth
0.5
OverconsolidationRatio(OCR)
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
2
4
Depth(m)
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Unit2E
Unit3A
Figure 6.7 Summary of overconsolidation ratio versus depth

36
6.2.4.
(Unit 4) Bedrock
Bedrock geotechnical units comprising claystone and sandstone were encountered along
the Pacific Highway and Wyong Road intersection and approaches upgrade alignment.
These units have been classified into three geotechnical units (4A, 4B, 4C) based on
stratigraphy and subsequently strength and defects in accordance with the guidelines
presented in Design Loadings for Foundations on Shale and Sandstone in the Sydney
Region (Pells et al, 1978) and Foundations on Sandstone and Shale in the Sydney
Region (Pells et al, 1998). On this basis, allowing for some variability, Unit 4A has been
classified as typically extremely low strength rock (Class V), Unit 4B classified as very low
to low strength rock (Class IV), and Unit 4C classified as typically medium to high strength
rock (Class III). The inferred subsurface profile and rock unit boundaries are presented on
the geotechnical section drawings in Appendix A.
Statistical analysis of the 20 point load index rock strength tests and unconfined
compressive strength tests undertaken within Unit 4A, Unit 4B, and Unit 4C has been
completed. The results summary from the rock strength statistical analysis is presented in
Table 6.2 and Table 6.3. Figure 6.8 illustrates the axial point load strength index results
against the average depth of the rock core sample tested.
Table 6.2 - Summary of UCS test data
Geotechnical
unit
No. of
tests
Maximum
(MPa)
Minimum
(MPa)
Average (MPa)
Standard deviation
(MPa)
4C
35.6
6.6
21.2
11.9
Table 6.3- Summary of point load index test data
Geotechnical
unit
No. of
tests
Maximum Is(50)
(MPa)
Minimum Is(50)
(MPa)
Average Is(50)
(MPa)
Standard deviation
(MPa)
4A
0.12 (axial)
0.17 (diametral)
0.11 (axial)
0.15 (diametral)
0.12 (axial)
0.16 (diametral)
0.01 (axial)
0.01 (diametral)
4B
0.15 (axial)
0.22 (diametral)
0.07 (axial)
0.12 (diametral)
0.11 (axial)
0.16 (diametral)
0.04 (axial)
0.06 (diametral)
4C
15
2.78 (axial)
2.08 (diametral)
0.34 (axial)
0.17 (diametral)
1.14 (axial)
0.91 (diametral)
0.84 (axial)
0.57 (diametral)
Note: (1) Test completed includes both axial and diametral point load index.
(2) Results are outlined in the table as axial / diametral.
Four (4) unconfined compressive strength tests (on as received moisture) were
undertaken on core samples from Unit 4C in BH07BH10 with results as outlined in
Section 5.1.1. These values were compared with the corresponding axial point load index
strength test results for the same core sample and the ratio of UCS to Is(50) ranged from
12.2 to 38.8. Figure 6.9 illustrates the UCS test results and corresponding axial point load
37
strength index test results for geotechnical Unit 4C along with the established Sydney
Basin correlation (Pells, 2004).
0.00
5.00
10.00
Depth(mAHD)
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
PointLoadStrengthIndexIs(50)(MPa)
Unit4A
Unit4B
2.50
3.00
Unit4C
Figure 6.8 - Summary of axial point load strength index test results

38
3.00
PointLoadIndexIs(50)(MPa)
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
UnconfinedCompressiveStrengthUCS(MPa)
UCS=20Is(50)
Unit4C
Figure 6.9 - UCS vs axial point load strength index correlation
6.3. Interpretation of CPTu Data

The CPTu data obtained from the field testing have been used to interpret geotechnical
layers (units) and to estimate engineering properties for the geotechnical design. The
CPTu data was correlated against the empirical formulae to estimate the engineering
properties for cohesive soils.
The two main parameters investigated were undrained shear strength (Su) and Over
Consolidation Ratio (OCR).
The relationship between Su and cone resistance, qc, is expressed as (Lunne et al., 1997):
Su = (qc vo)/Nk
Where Nk is an empirical factor and vo is total overburden stress. Nk of 15 was adopted
for this assessment.
The relationship between OCR and qc was adopted as follows:
OCR = k (qt vo)/vo
39
k is an empirical factor and vo is the effective overburden stress, with a k of 0.2 adopted
for this assessment.
The profiles of Su and OCR are included in Appendix E. These plots have been used to
assist in the development of the ground model for the site.

40
7. References
Ahern C. R., Stone Y., and Blunden B. (1998), Acid Sulfate Soils Assessment Guidelines,
published by the Acid Sulfate Soil Management Advisory Committee (ASSMAC),
Wollongbar, NSW, Australia.
CSIRO Australia (2006), Australian Soil Resource Information System ASRIS, accessed
09/01/2012, http://www.asris.csiro.au/mapping/viewer.htm.
Department of Main Roads, NSW (1984), Bridge over Main Northern Railway Line near
Tuggerah Sheet 1 to 4, Registration Number of Plans: 0335 505 BC 0914, Main Road No:
335, Shire of Wyong.
Department of Natural Resources (2012). NSW Natural Resource Atlas, accessed
09/01/2012, http://www.nratlas.nsw.gov.au.
Geological Survey of New South Wales (2003), Gosford-Lake Macquarie 1:100 000
Geological Sheet 9131 - 9231, provisional edition, NSW Department of Primary Industries,
Sydney.
Lunne, T, Robertson, P.K. and Powell, J.J.M. (1996), Cone Penetration Testing in
Geotechnical Practice, 1st Edition, London, Chapman and Hall, UK.
Murphy C. L., (1993), Soil Landscapes of the Gosford-Lake Macquarie 1:100 000 Sheet
map and report, Department of Conservation and Land Management, Sydney.
Pells P. J. N., Douglas D. J., Rodway B., Thorne C., and McMahon B. K. (1978), Design
Loadings for Foundations on Shale and Sandstone in the Sydney Region, Australian
Geomechanics Journal, Vol. G8, Pages 31 39.
Pells P. J. N., Mostyn G. and Walker B. F. (1998), Foundations on Sandstone and Shale
in the Sydney Region, Australian Geomechanics Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3, Pages 17 29.
Pells P. J. N. (2004), Substance and Mass Properties for the Design of Engineering
Structures in the Hawkesbury Sandstone, Australian Geomechanics Journal, Vol. 39, No.
3,Pages 1 22.
Roads and Maritime Services (2006), Pavement Design Report: Tuggerah Intersection
Improvement Pavement Investigation, Hunter Region Geotechnical Services, Report No.
2523/01, dated 22 November 2006.
Roads and Maritime Services (2008), Pavement Design Report: Tuggerah Intersection
Improvement Stage 2 East of Rail Over Bridge, Hunter Region Geotechnical Services,
Report No. 2523/02, dated 27 March 2008.
41
Sinclair Knight Merz (2012a), Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335
Intersection and Approaches Upgrade: Report on Existing Geotechnical Information and
Detailed Geotechnical Investigations Proposal Plan, NB11462-ESG-RP-0001-B, 17
February 2012, Sydney.
Sinclair Knight Merz (2012b), Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335
Intersection and Approaches Upgrade: Review of Environmental Factors, EIA-P05-G02T03, 08 May 2012, Sydney.
Sinclair Knight Merz (2012c), Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335
Intersection and Approaches Upgrade: Geotechnical Investigations Environmental
Management Plan, NB11462-NEM-PR-0002-D, 15 May 2012, Sydney.
Sinclair Knight Merz (2012d), Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335
Intersection and Approaches Upgrade: Geotechnical Design Report, NB11462-ESG-RP0003, 22 September 2012, Sydney.
Sinclair Knight Merz (2012e), Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335
Intersection and Approaches Upgrade: Geotechnical Safety Plan, NB11462-AAA-PL0003-A, 12 March 2012, Sydney.
Sinclair Knight Merz (2012f), Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335
Intersection and Approaches Upgrade: Method Statement Geotechnical Site
Investigation, NB11462-ESG-RW-0001-D 30 May 2012, Sydney.
Standards Australia International (1993), Australian Standard AS1726 1993,
Geotechnical Site Investigations, Sydney.
Standards Australia International (2000), Australian Standard AS1289 2000 Methods of
Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes, Sydney.
Standards Australia International (2005), Australian Standard AS4133 2005 Methods of
Testing Rocks for Engineering Purposes, Sydney.
Standards Australia International (2009), Australian Standard AS2159 2009 Piling
Design and Installation, Sydney.

42
8. Limitations
The sole purpose of this report is to present the findings of a geotechnical investigation
carried out by Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM) for the Roads and Maritime Services of NSW
(RMS) in connection with Pacific Highway (HW 10) and Wyong Road (MR 335)
intersection and approaches upgrade. This report was produced in accordance with and is
limited to the scope of services set out in the contract between SKM and the RMS. That
scope of services, as described in this report, was developed with the RMS.
Undertaking an assessment or study of on-site conditions may reduce the potential for
exposure to the presence of inadequate bearing ground. All reports and conclusions that
deal with sub-surface conditions are based on interpretation and judgement and as a
result have uncertainty attached to them. You should be aware that this report contains
interpretations and conclusions which are uncertain, due to the nature of the
investigations. No study can completely eliminate risk, and even a rigorous assessment
and/or sampling programme may not detect all problem areas within a site.
This report is based on assumptions that the site conditions as revealed through sampling
are indicative of conditions throughout the site. The findings are the result of standard
assessment techniques used in accordance with normal practices and standards, and (to
the best of SKMs knowledge) they represent a reasonable interpretation of the current
conditions on the site.
However, all sampling techniques, by definition, cannot determine the conditions between
the sample points and so the report can only provide an indication of, and cannot be taken
to be a full representation of, the sub-surface conditions. It is an indication of the likely sub
surface conditions.
Conditions as encountered when site work commences may be different from those SKM
infers based on its sampling techniques. It is important that SKM is retained to review the
site conditions during site works to confirm and update any assumptions made during the
preparation of this report.
The passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions or impacts of future events may
require further examination of the project and subsequent data analysis, and re-evaluation
of the data, findings, observations and conclusions expressed in this report.
In preparing this report, SKM has relied upon, and presumed accurate, any information (or
confirmation of the absence thereof) provided by the Client and from other sources.
Except as otherwise stated in the report, SKM has not attempted to verify the accuracy or
completeness of any such information. If the information is subsequently determined to be
false, inaccurate or incomplete then it is possible that our observations and conclusions as
expressed in this report may change.
43
SKM has prepared this report in accordance with the usual care and thoroughness of the
consulting profession, for the sole purpose described above and by reference to
applicable standards, guidelines, procedures and practices at the date of issue of this
report. For the reasons outlined above, however, no other warranty or guarantee, whether
expressed or implied, is made as to the data, observations and findings expressed in this
report, to the extent permitted by law.
This report does not address environmental or geo-environmental issues including the
presence of any contaminants or hazardous materials at the site unless SKM was
specifically and expressly retained to do so.
Except as specifically stated in this report, SKM makes no statement or representation of
any kind concerning the suitability of the site for any purpose or the permissibility of any
use. Use of the site for any purpose may require planning and other approvals and, in
some cases, Environmental Protection Authority and accredited site auditor approvals.
SKM offers no opinion as to the likelihood of obtaining any such approvals, or the
conditions and obligations which such approvals may impose, which may include the
requirement for additional environmental investigations and/or works.
This report should be read in full and no excerpts are to be taken as representative of the
findings. No responsibility is accepted by SKM for use of any part of this report in any
other context.
This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of, SKMs Client,
and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the agreement between
SKM and its Client. SKM accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect
of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party.

44
Appendix A Site investigation location

plan and geotechnical sections

45
Appendix B Background information

B1:
Soil and geological figures
B2:
As-built bridge drawings
B3:
RMS pavement investigation locations
B4:
Site inspection photographs
B5:
80% concept design drawings

46
B1:
Soil and geological figures

47
Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335 Intersection and Approaches Upgrade
LEGEND
30
m
m
20
m
10
10
m
Tuggerah
Railway
Station
10 metre contour (AHD)

Construction footprint
Soil Landcape
Erina
Tacoma Swamp
Watagan
Woodburys Bridge
Wyong
Acid sulphate soil risk
High probability
of occurrence
Low probability
of occurrence
!
m
10
10
m
40
20
m
30 m
50
10 m
50 m
300
Metres
m
80
m
0
6
70 m
NEWCASTLE
40 m
NSW
! TUGGERAH
30
20 m
10
90
DATA SOURCES
Ausimage (2010)
LPMA (2010)
SKM (2012)
SYDNEY
Figure B1 | Geology and soil landscape

I:\NBIF\Projects\NB11462\Technical\Spatial\Spatial_Directory\ArcGIS\Geotech\NB11462_WyongRdPacHwy_GT_001a_Geology_soils.mxd 10/09/2012
Newcatle Spatial Team - Prepared by : AL
B2:
As-built bridge drawings

48
B3:
RMS pavement investigation locations

49
B4:
Site inspection photographs

50
NB11462: Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335 Intersection and Approaches Upgrade
Plate 1: View south east, adjacent to Anzac

Road
Plate 2: View south, vegetation behind 8 Anzac

Road, Tuggerah
Plate 3: View south west, vegetation behind 8

Anzac Road, Tuggerah
Plate 4: View south, along Pacific Highway
Plate 5: View north east, adjacent to rail corridor
Plate 6: View, southern pedestrian underpass

entrance
Plate 7: View north, vegetation and Wyong

Road embankment
Plate 8: View north east, Pacific Highway and

Tambelin Street Intersection
Plate 9: View, bridge over railway
Plate 10: View, bridge over railway - eastern

abutment
Plate 11: View south east, Wyong Road behind

Tuggerah Supa Centre
Plate 12: View north west, Wyong Road

behind Tuggerah Supa Centre
B5:
80% concept design drawings

51
Appendix C Explanatory notes and

engineering logs
C1:
Explanatory notes
C2:
Borehole logs
C3:
Test pit logs
C4:
Cone Penetration Test (CPTu)
C5:
Monitoring well construction record
C6:
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)

52
C1:
Explanatory notes

53
C2:
Borehole logs

54
HOLE NO: BH01
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352801, N: 6313404 ( MGA94)
SURFACE ELEVATION : 4.0 (AHD)
LOCATION : Tuggerah, NSW
RIG TYPE : Comacchio GEO 305 (track)
CONTRACTOR : Terratest Pty Ltd (Tim Purdy)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 26/7/12 to 26/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
STANDARD : AS 1726 - 1993
CHECKED BY : SRR
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
& Other Observations
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Soil Type, Colour, Plasticity or Particle Characteristic
Secondary and Minor Components
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
PROJECT : HW10 & MR335 Intersection Upgrade JOB NO : NB11462
TOPSOIL
Silty CLAY: Dark brown - grey, low plasticity, some fine grained sand, trace fine
angular to sub-angular gravel, trace organics, moist, soft, topsoil.
M
AD/T
0.80m
1.00m
SPT
1, 4, 7
N=11
3.0
1.0
ALLUVIUM
Sandy CLAY: Brown mottled grey, low plasticity, fine to medium grained sand,
trace silt, wet, stiff, alluvium.
W
1.45m
1.70m
1.80m
D
2.00m
SPT
3, 6, 7
N=13
SAND: Pale grey mottled orange/brown, fine to medium grained, trace silt, wet,
medium dense, alluvium.
2.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
0.0
4.0
- As above, becoming pale grey mottled brown
2.45m
3.00m
SPT
9, 11, 10
N=21
- As above, becoming grey, with some clay
WB
Groundwater Encountered at 1.20m
3.45m
4.00m
SPT
6, 3, 6
N=9
4.20m
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: Grey/pale grey, high plasticity, trace fine grained sand, wet, stiff,
residual soil.
4.45m

5.00m
U50
-1.0
5.0
5.45m
6.00m
-2.0
SPT
7, 11, 16
N=27
6.0
- As above, becoming pale grey, very stiff
6.45m
W
7.00m
-3.0
SPT
8, 16, 21
N=37
7.0
- As above, becoming hard
SKM AGS REV2_DA.GLB Log SKM SOIL LOG NB11462_SOIL.GPJ <<DrawingFile>> 24/08/2012 15:54
7.45m
W
8.00m
-4.0
SPT
6, 15, 18
N=33
8.0
8.45m
8.70m
9.00m
-5.0
SPT
8, 14, 19
N=33
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange/dark red, high plasticity, some ironstone
inclusions, wet, hard, residual soil.
9.0
9.45m
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS
= Water level (static)
= Water level (during drilling)
SAMPLES & FIELD TESTS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
U Undisturbed Tube Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
HP Hand Penetrometer
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
D = Dry M = Moist W = Wet
(P: Peak Su R: Residual Su)
N SPT blows per 300mm
HW SPT penetration by hammer weight
RW SPT penetration by rod weight
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Medium Dense 10 - 30
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm
CONSISTENCY (Su) {N-value}

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
File: NB11462 BH01 Page 1 OF 2
HOLE NO: BH01
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 2 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352801, N: 6313404 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 26/7/12 to 26/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
VSt / VD
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange/dark red, high plasticity, some ironstone
inclusions, wet, hard, residual soil. (continued)
WB
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
10.50m
SPT
7, 14, 20
N=34
10.95m
-7.0
12.00m
-8.0
SPT
7, 20, 24
N=44
11.0
12.0
12.10m
BEDROCK
CLAYSTONE: Dark red, extremely weathered, extremely low strength.
12.45m
12.45m
Borehole terminated at 12.45 m
-9.0
13.0
-10.0
14.0
-11.0
15.0
-12.0
16.0
-13.0
17.0
-14.0
18.0
-15.0
19.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH02
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 352834, N: 6313310 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 23/7/12 to 23/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
Silty CLAY: Dark grey mottled brown, medium plasticity, trace fine grained
sand, trace organics, moist, stiff.
0.80m
D
1.00m
SPT
3, 4, 5
N=9
M
3.8
1.0
2.8
2.0
1.8
3.0
- As above, becoming brown mottled pale grey
1.45m
1.80m
ALLUVIUM
SAND: pale grey mottled orange/brown, fine to medium grained, trace clay,
wet, medium dense, alluvium.
2.50m
SPT
6, 9, 9
N=18
2.95m
3.00m
D
AD/T
W
4.00m
SPT
3, 3, 7
N=10
0.8
4.0
-0.2
5.0
- As above, becoming pale grey
4.45m
5.00m
D
5.50m
SPT
3, 5, 6
N=11
5.60m
Sandy CLAY: pale grey, medium plasticity, fine grained sand, some silt, wet,
stiff, alluvium.
5.95m
-1.2
6.0
6.40m
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: pale grey mottled dark red/orange, medium plasticity, trace fine
grained sand, moist, very stiff, residual soil.
7.00m
-2.2
SPT
6, 10, 14
N=24
7.0
7.45m
-3.2
8.0
8.50m
SPT
8, 16, 23
N=39
- As above, becoming pale grey mottled orange, hard
8.95m
-4.2
9.0
9.70: No SPT at 10.00m, hole

collapse to 7.50m
10.00m
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH03
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 352634, N: 6313309 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 23/7/12 to 23/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
ASPHALT: Fine to coarse grained.

SAND: Grey - pale grey, fine to coarse grained sand, fine to medium
angular to sub-angular gravel, dry, loose, fill.
Sandy CLAY: Pale brown, low plasticity, fine grained sand, trace silt, trace fine
sub-angular gravel, dry, soft, fill.
VSt / VD
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
ROAD SURFACE
FILL
0.10m
Gravelly
0.35m
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
0.80m
1.00m
SPT
4, 4, 3
N=7
11.4
1.0
Silty SAND: Pale brown/dark grey, fine to medium grained, trace fine
sub-angular gravel, dry to moist, loose.
D-M
1.45m
1.60m
Sandy CLAY: Pale brown/grey mottled orange/dark red, low plasticity, fine to
medium grained sand, trace fine sub-angular gravel, dry to moist, stiff.
Groundwater Not Encountered
AD/T
2.00m
SPT
4, 5, 8
N=13
10.4
1.70: B (1.70 - 2.50m)
2.0
D-M
2.45m
2.70m
2.80m
D
3.00m
SPT
6, 12, 14
N=26
9.4
3.0
8.4
4.0
7.4
5.0
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled dark red/orange, high plasticity, some fine
grained sand, some ironstone fragments up to 25mm, dry to moist, very stiff,
residual soil.
3.45m
D-M
4.00m
SPT
8, 12, 17
N=29
4.45m
5.00m
SPT
9, 12, 21
N=33
D-M
5.45m
5.70m
6.00m
SPT
8, 15, 16
N=31
Sandy CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange/dark red, low plasticity, fine to medium
grained sand, dry to moist, hard, residual soil.
6.4
6.0
6.45m
D-M
6.45m
SKM AGS REV2_DA.GLB Log SKM SOIL LOG NB11462_COMBINED.GPJ <<DrawingFile>> 31/08/2012 12:37
5.4
7.0
4.4
8.0
3.4
9.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH04
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 352714, N: 6313301 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 27/7/12 to 27/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
Silty SAND: Dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, some clay, trace fine to
medium sub-angular gravel, some organics, dry, loose, topsoil.
D
0.50m
D
0.70m
1.00m
SPT
4, 6, 9
N=15
Silty CLAY: Brown mottled red/orange, medium plasticity, trace fine grained
sand, trace organics, moist, stiff.
10.1
1.0
1.45m
1.60m
D
- As above, becoming red-brown

1.90m
AD/T
2.00m
SPT
6, 11, 12
N=23
9.1
2.0
8.1
3.0
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled red/orange, medium plasticity, trace fine grained
sand, some dark red ironstone, moist, very stiff, residual soil.
2.45m
2.80m
D
3.00m
SPT
5, 11, 13
N=24
3.45m
3.50m
D
4.00m
SPT
6, 11, 13
N=24
7.1
4.0
6.1
5.0
4.45m
4.70m
D
5.00m
SPT
10, 13,
20 N=33
5.45m
M
5.90m
D
6.00m
SPT
5, 18, 17
N=35
5.1
6.0
6.45m
6.45m
4.1
7.0
3.1
8.0
2.1
9.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH05
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352767, N: 6313297 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 23/7/12 to 23/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
0.15m
Silty
CLAY: Dark brown, some fine grained sand, organic, very soft, moist,
topsoil.
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
Silty CLAY: Grey - brown mottled dark grey, medium plasticity, trace fine
grained sand, trace fine sub-angular gravel, moist, stiff.
1.00m
SPT
3, 4, 8
N=12
7.2
1.0
6.2
2.0
5.2
3.0
1.45m
1.80m
2.00m
SPT
11, 12,
20 N=32
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange, high plasticity, trace fine grained sand,
moist, hard, residual soil.
2.45m
M
3.00m
SPT
5, 12, 20
N=32
3.45m
AD/T
3.70m
4.00m
SPT
6, 12, 21
N=33
Sandy CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange, low plasticity, fine grained sand, trace
silt, occasional rootlet, moist, hard, residual soil.
4.2
4.45m
5.00m
SPT
4, 12, 16
N=28
3.2
5.0
5.00m
grained sand, ironstone fragments up to 30 mm, moist, very stiff, residual soil.
5.45m
M
6.00m
2.2
SPT
5, 18,
25/70mm
HB N=R
6.37m
7.00m
1.2
SPT
8, 30,
11/50mm
HB N=R
7.35m
4.0
7.80m
D
8.00m
SPT
13, 20,
30 N=50
6.0
7.0
- As above, becoming red-brown mottled pale grey, trace ironstone fragments

up to 15 mm
0.2
8.0
8.45m
- As above, becoming pale grey mottled dark red

9.00m
-0.8
SPT
14, 16,
30 N=46
9.0
9.45m
10.00m
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH05
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 2 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352767, N: 6313297 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 23/7/12 to 23/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
AD/T
CHECKED BY : SRR
SPT
12, 15,
22 N=37
grained sand, ironstone fragments up to 30 mm, moist, very stiff, residual soil.
(continued)
10.45m
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
RESIDUAL SOIL
M
10.45m
-2.8
11.0
-3.8
12.0
-4.8
13.0
-5.8
14.0
-6.8
15.0
-7.8
16.0
-8.8
17.0
-9.8
18.0
-10.8
19.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH07
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 352862, N: 6313276 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 25/7/12 to 26/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
Sandy CLAY: Dark brown, low plasticity, fine to medium grained sand, some
silt, some organics, moist, soft, topsoil.
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
M
0.60m
Silty CLAY: Brown mottled orange/grey, medium plasticity, some fine grained
sand, trace fine sub-angular gravel, moist, stiff.
AD/T
1.00m
SPT
3, 4, 5
N=9
4.1
1.0
1.45m
- As above, becoming pale brown

1.90m
2.00m
D
3.1
2.0
2.1
3.0
Silty CLAY: Grey mottled orange, medium plasticity, trace fine grained sand,
moist, stiff.
2.50m
SPT
3, 5, 8
N=13
Groundwater Not Observed
2.95m
3.60m
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled yellow/orange, high plasticity, trace fine grained
sand, moist, very stiff, residual soil.
4.00m
SPT
5, 12, 12
N=24
1.1
4.0
4.45m
M
0.1
5.0
WB
- As above, becoming red-brown mottled orange/dark red/pale grey

5.50m
SPT
22, 24,
22 N=46
5.95m
-0.9
6.0
- As above, becoming pale grey mottled orange/dark red
7.00m
-1.9
SPT
9, 16, 20
N=36
7.0
7.45m
-2.9
8.0
8.50m
SPT
17, 26,
15/30mm
HB N=R
8.83m
8.50m
Continued as cored drill hole (refusal)
-3.9
9.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH07
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 25/7/12 to 26/7/12

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
1000
100
10
Is(50)
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-10
8.0
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
UCS (ITS)
-2.9
-3
7.0
EH
-1.9
-1
6.0
VH
-0.9
-0.3
5.0
0.1
-0.1
4.0
1.1
-0.03
3.0
2.1
- Axial
- Diametral
VL
2.0
Weathering
3.1
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
EL
1.0
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
ROCK TYPE : Colour, Grain size, Structure
(texture, fabric, mineral composition, hardness
alteration, cementation, etc as applicable)
GRAPHIC
LOG
4.1
CHECKED BY : SRR
Description of joints, seams,

defects, additional observations
and comments
START CORING AT 8.50m

CORE LOSS 0.25m (8.50-8.75)
Run 1
NMLC
SKM AGS REV2_DA.GLB Log SKM ROCK NB11462_ROCK.GPJ <<DrawingFile>> 24/08/2012 19:16
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 2 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352862, N: 6313276 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
71%
TCR
-3.9
0%
RQD
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled dark red/orange, high plasticity, some
fine grained, moist, hard, residual soil.
9.0
9.35
100%
TCR
0%
RQD
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring
TCR % core run recovered

RQD % core run > 100mm long
(rock fraction only measured)
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
DEFECT ABBREVIATIONS
CS Crushed Seam CN Clean
Cu Curved
CZ Crushed Zone CT Coating IR Irregular
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
FZ Fractured Zone VR Veneer
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided
ROCK STRENGTH (Is50 MPa)

0-0.03 Extremely Low
0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
File: NB11462 BH07 2 OF 4
HOLE NO: BH07
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 25/7/12 to 26/7/12

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
Run 2
CHECKED BY : SRR
1000
100
10
Is(50)
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-3
-1
-0.3
-0.1
-10
EH
VH
VL
-0.03
- Axial
- Diametral
EL
Weathering
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
UCS (ITS)
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC
LOG
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 3 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352862, N: 6313276 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL

and comments
Sandy CLAY: Yellow mottled pale grey, low plasticity, some silt,
moist, hard.
100%
TCR
0%
RQD
10.55
CLAYSTONE: Dark red, occasional pale grey clay band, slightly

fractured, extremely weathered, low strength.
-5.9
EW
10.82: DB
10.97: DB
11.12: DB
Is(50)
a=0.12
d=0.17
MPa
11.0
11.40: BG, 0, PR, RF

Run 3
100%
TCR
11.62: DB
11.73: DB
0%
RQD
-6.9
12.0
12.36: DB
12.46: DB
12.85
12.87: DB
-7.9
13.0
13.31: DB
Run 4
-8.9
14.0
-9.9
15.0
100%
TCR
0%
RQD
14.71: BG, 0, IR, RF

NMLC
14.87: DB
Is(50)
a=0.1
d=0.12
MPa
15.14: DB
15.40: DB
15.80
-10.9
16.0
16.38: DB
16.48: DB
Run 5
52%
TCR
0%
RQD
-11.9
17.0
-12.9
18.0
16.73: DB
16.79: DB
16.82: DB
CORE LOSS 0.95m (16.85-17.80)
17.80
SANDSTONE: Pale grey, fine grained, thinly laminated, poorly

developed, slightly fractured, moderately weathered, medium
strength.
MW
Is(50)
a=0.34
d=0.47
MPa
17.89: BG, 5, PR, RF

18.12: DB
- As above, with thin dark red claystone bed (18.29 - 18.36 m)
Run 6
-13.9
84%
RQD
18.55: BG, 0, IR, RF

18.57: BG, 0, IR, RF
18.62: BG, 0, IR, RF
UCS Is(50)
20.2 a=0.84
MPa d=0.64
MPa
100%
TCR
19.0
19.06: DB
19.14: DB
19.42: BG, 0, IR, RF
19.45: DB
19.50: BG, 0, PR, RF
19.51 - 19.54: DZ (30mm),
C
20.00
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
HOLE NO: BH07
ROCK LOG
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
1000
100
10
Is(50)
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-10
-3
-1
-0.3
-0.1
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
UCS (ITS)
EH
VH
-0.03
MW
- Axial
- Diametral
SANDSTONE: Pale grey, fine grained, thinly laminated, poorly

developed, slightly fractured, moderately weathered, medium
strength. (continued)
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
VL
DESCRIPTION
Weathering
MATERIAL
EL
DRILL
DEPTH
GRAPHIC
LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 25/7/12 to 26/7/12

DRILLING
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 4 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352862, N: 6313276 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL

and comments
19.73: BG, 0, IR, RF
19.93: DB
20.43: BG, 5, PR, RF
NMLC
20.71: BG, 0, IR, RF
Run 7
100%
TCR
-15.9
21.0
55%
RQD
- As above, becoming highly fractured, highly weathered, low

strength
-16.9
22.10
HW
21.06: BG, 0, PR, RF
Is(50)
a=0.78
d=0.91
MPa
21.26 - 21.50: FZ (240mm)

21.57: BG, 0, PR, RF
21.66: DB
21.74 - 21.93: FZ (190mm)
22.0
22.00 - 22.08: FZ (80mm)
-17.9
23.0
-18.9
24.0
-19.9
25.0
-20.9
26.0
-21.9
27.0
-22.9
28.0
-23.9
29.0
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Project: HW10 & MR335 Intersection Upgrade
Borehole: BH07
Depth: 8.50 22.10 m
Date: 25.07.2012 26.07.2012
HOLE NO: BH08
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352875, N: 6313232 ( MGA94)
RIG TYPE : Edson 3000 (truck)
CONTRACTOR : Terratest Pty Ltd (Richard Welsh)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 9/6/12 to 10/6/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
FILL
FILL: Silty Clay, dark brown mottled grey/brown/yellow, low plasticity, some fine
to medium grained sand, some fine to coarse sub-angular gravel, trace silt,
occasional ballast up to 85mm, wet, soft, fill.
NDD
3.8
1.0
1.20m
ALLUVIUM
Clayey SAND: Pale brown - grey, fine grained, trace silt, trace fine to medium
sub-angular to sub-rounded gravel, wet, loose, alluvium.
1.80m
ES
2.00m
SPT
2, 2, 3
N=5
2.8
2.0
1.8
3.0
0.8
4.0
2.45m
3.95m
AD/T
3.30m
ES
3.50m
SPT
2, 3, 4
N=7
4.40m
Silty CLAY: Grey-brown, low plasticity, some fine to medium grained sand, wet,
firm, alluvium.
5.00m
SPT
2, 3, 4
N=7
-0.2
5.0
5.45m
5.70m
Clayey SAND: Grey-brown, fine to medium grained, trace silt, loose, wet,
alluvium.
-1.2
6.0
6.50: U75 attempted: 70mm

recovery
7.0
7.50m
SPT
4, 6, 14
N=20
7.50: SPT Recovery: 0 m
- As above, becoming medium dense
7.95m
-3.2
8.0
WB
-2.2
8.60m
Silty CLAY: Brown/pale orange - pale grey, high plasticity, some fine grained
sand, wet, hard, alluvium.
9.00m
-4.2
SPT
8, 20,
24/90mm
HB N=R
9.39m
9.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH08
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 2 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352875, N: 6313232 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
WB
VSt / VD
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
ALLUVIUM
Silty CLAY: Brown/pale orange - pale grey, high plasticity, some fine grained
sand, wet, hard, alluvium. (continued)
10.50m
SPT
7, 13, 21
N=34
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
10.90m
10.95m
-6.2
12.00m
-7.2
SPT
7, 15, 25
N=40
11.0
RESIDUAL SOIL
CLAY: Dark red - brown, high plasticity, some silt, some fine grained sand, wet,
hard, residual soil.
12.0
12.45m
-8.2
13.0
13.50m
SPT
5, 12, 26
N=38
13.50m
Continued as cored drill hole
13.95m
-9.2
14.0
-10.2
15.0
-11.2
16.0
-12.2
17.0
-13.2
18.0
-14.2
19.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH08
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
1000
100
10
Is(50)
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-10
-3
-1
-0.3
-0.1
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
UCS (ITS)
EH
VH
13.0
-0.03
-8.2
- Axial
- Diametral
12.0
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
VL
-7.2
Weathering
11.0
MATERIAL
EL
-6.2
CHECKED BY : SRR
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC
LOG
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 3 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352875, N: 6313232 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL

and comments
Run 1
-9.2
14.0
-10.2
15.0
CLAYSTONE: Dark red mottled pale yellow/grey, occasional thinly

bedded to medium bedded fine grained sandstone, poorly
developed, slightly fractured, extremely low strength, extremely
weathered.
EW
13.85: JT, 85, IR, RF
14.05: DB
100%
TCR
0%
RQD
15.00
14.81: DB
14.92: BG, 0, IR, RF
14.98: DB
15.74: DB
-11.2
Run 2
16.0
16.37: DB
100%
TCR
NMLC
0%
RQD
-12.2
17.0
17.51: DB
17.75: DB
17.84: DB
18.00
-13.2
18.0
18.08: DB
- As above, becoming very low strength
18.41: BG, 0, IR, RF

18.58: BG, 0, IR, RF
Run 3
100%
TCR
-14.2
SANDSTONE: Pale grey mottled pale yellow/orange, fine grained,

occasional thinly bedded to medium bedded dark red claystone,
poorly developed, fractured, very low strength, highly weathered.
19.0
48%
RQD
18.76: DB
HW
19.03: DB
19.10 - 19.13: FZ (30mm)
19.13: JT, 15, PR, RF
19.22: DB
19.29 - 19.34: FZ (50mm)
19.48 - 19.55: FZ (70mm)
19.60 - 20.00: CZ (400mm),
Rf
20.00
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
HOLE NO: BH08
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
Run 4
1000
100
10
Is(50)
-3
-1
-0.3
-0.1
-0.03
-10
EH
VH
VL

and comments
20.02: JT, 75, PR, RF
20.13: BG, 0, PR, RF
20.42: DB
20.52: BG, 0, IT, RF
20.66 - 20.73: DZ (70mm),
C
20.87: JT, 10, PR, RF
21.03, JT, 5, PR, RF
Is(50)
a=1.02
d=0.95
MPa
21.0
100%
TCR
21.44: JT, 30, PR, RF
72%
RQD
NMLC
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
MW
- As above, becoming high strength

-16.2
- Axial
- Diametral
EL
Weathering
SANDSTONE: Pale grey mottled pale yellow/orange, fine grained,

occasional thinly bedded to medium bedded dark red claystone,
poorly developed, fractured, very low strength, highly weathered.
(continued)
- As above, becoming low strength, moderately weathered
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
UCS (ITS)
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC
LOG
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 4 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352875, N: 6313232 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
23.00
-17.2
22.0
-18.2
23.0
UCS Is(50)
35.6 a=2.46
MPa d=1.76
MPa
21.82: BG, 0, PR, RF

21.90: BG, 0, PR, RF
21.94: BG, 0, PR, RF
21.97: JT, 35, PR, RF
22.08: JT, 10, IR, RF
22.11: JT, 70, PR, RF
22.18: DB
22.26: JT, 50, PR, RF
22.48: JT, 35, Cu, RF
22.63: JT, 10, IR, RF
22.70: JT, 60, PR, RF
Is(50)
a=2.21
d=1.52
MPa
- As above, becoming slightly weathered
23.10: JT, 15, PR, RF

23.19: DB
SW
23.60: BG, 0, PR, RF
23.73: BG, 0, PR, RF
-19.2
Run 5
Is(50)
a=2.78
d=1.54
MPa
24.0
CLAYSTONE: Dark red, occasional very thinly bedded fine grained

sandstone, well developed, fractured, medium strength, slightly
weathered.
100%
TCR
24.15: DB
24.28: JT, 5, PR, RF
SW
81%
RQD
24.73: DB
-20.2
26.00
Is(50)
a=0.41
d=0.51
MPa
25.0
-21.2
26.0
-22.2
27.0
-23.2
28.0
-24.2
29.0
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
25.16: DB
25.22: JT, 15, PR, RF
25.32 - 25.36: CZ (40mm),
Rf
25.40: JT, 75, IR, RF
25.60: DB
25.73: JT, 15, PR, RF
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Borehole: BH08
Depth: 13.55 26.00 m
Date: 09.06.2012 10.06.2012
HOLE NO: BH09
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352890, N: 6313213 ( MGA94)
CONTRACTOR : Terratest Pty Ltd (Anthony Zumma)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
FILL: Silty Clay, dark brown mottled grey/pale grey, low plasticity, some fine to
medium grained sand, some fine to coarse angular to sub-angular gravel, trace
silt, occasional ballast up to 115mm, moist, soft, fill.
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
FILL
M
0.60m
ALLUVIUM
NDD
Silty SAND: Grey - brown, fine grained, trace clay, trace fine sub-angular
gravel, wet, loose, alluvium.
3.00m
SPT
4, 4, 2
N=6
4.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
4.0
- As above, with some clay, trace organics (decomposed timber)
AD/T
3.45m
4.50m
SPT
1, 5, 4
N=9
- As above, becoming pale grey mottled brown/orange, some clay
4.95m
0.0
5.0
5.20m
Silty SAND: Grey - brown mottled pale grey/pale yellow, fine grained, some
clay, wet, medium dense, alluvium.
6.00m
SPT
2, 3, 9
N=12
-1.0
6.0
6.45m
7.0
7.50m
SPT
5, 13, 18
N=31
- As above, becoming grey-brown, fine to medium grained, trace clay, dense.
7.95m
-3.0
8.0
WB
-2.0
W
9.00m
-4.0
SPT
10, 15,
20 N=35
9.0
- As above, becoming mottled pale orange
9.45m
9.80m
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH09
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 2 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352890, N: 6313213 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
ALLUVIUM
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled brown/pale orange, high plasticity, trace fine
grained sand, wet, stiff, alluvium. (continued)
10.50m
SPT
5, 7, 8
N=15
WB
10.95m
12.00m
SPT
6, 9, 15
N=24
-6.0
11.0
-7.0
12.0
- As above, becoming very stiff

W
12.40m
12.45m
RESIDUAL SOIL
CLAY: Dark red - brown, high plasticity, some silt, trace fine grained sand, wet
hard, residual soil.
-8.0
13.0
13.50m
SPT
10, 21,
35 N=56
13.95m
-9.0
14.0
14.40m
SPT
14, 26,
33 N=59
14.50m
14.85m
-10.0
15.0
-11.0
16.0
-12.0
17.0
-13.0
18.0
-14.0
19.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH09
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
1000
100
10
Is(50)
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-10
-3
-1
-0.3
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
UCS (ITS)
EH
VH
14.0
-0.1
-9.0
13.0
-0.03
-8.0
- Axial
- Diametral
12.0
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
VL
-7.0
Weathering
11.0
MATERIAL
EL
-6.0
CHECKED BY : SRR
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC
LOG
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 3 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352890, N: 6313213 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL

and comments
Run 1
-10.0
15.0
-11.0
16.0
CLAYSTONE: Dark red mottled pale yellow/grey, occasional thinly

bedded to medium bedded fine grained sandstone, poorly
developed, slightly fractured, extremely low strength, extremely
weathered.
14.58: DB
EW
14.67 - 14.83: DZ (160mm),

C
100%
TCR
0%
RQD
15.79: DB
15.92: DB
16.25
16.26: DB
16.43: DB
16.50: BG, 10, PR, RF
16.57: DB
16.84: DB
17.0
SKM AGS REV2_DA.GLB Log SKM ROCK NB11462_ROCK_1.GPJ <<DrawingFile>> 03/09/2012 11:48
NMLC
-12.0
17.50: DB
Run 2
100%
TCR
0%
RQD
-13.0
18.0
18.36: DB
- As above, becoming low strength, highly weathered
18.58: BG, 0, PR, RF
HW
18.75: BG, 5, PR, RF

-14.0
19.0
Is(50)
a=0.15
d=0.22
MPa
19.25
19.18: DB
19.50: BG, 0, PR, RF
19.60: BG, 0, PR, RF
100%
TCR
85%
RQD
19.87: BG, 0, IR, RF
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
HOLE NO: BH09
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
1000
100
10
Is(50)
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-3
-1
-0.3
-0.1
-10
EH
VH
VL
-0.03
- Axial
- Diametral
EL
Weathering
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
UCS (ITS)
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC
LOG
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 4 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352890, N: 6313213 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL

and comments
HW
SANDSTONE: Pale grey mottled pale orange, fine grained,

laminated, poorly developed, slightly fractured, medium to high
strength, moderately weathered.
Run 3
-16.0
20.20: BG, 0, IR, RF

20.40: BG, 0, IR, RF
20.49:JT, 50, PR< RF
20.57: JT, 50, PR, RF
20.70: JT, 60, PR, RF
MW
21.0
100%
TCR
21.34: BG, 0, PR, RF
85%
RQD
Is(50)
a=2.31
d=2.08
MPa
-17.0
21.60: BG, 0, PR, RF

21.68: BG, 0, PR, RF
22.0
22.25
NMLC
22.32: DB
-18.0
Is(50)
a=0.94
d=0.97
MPa
23.0
22.88: JT, 20, IR, RF

23.24: JT, 25, PR, RF
Run 4
CLAYSTONE: Dark red, occasional thinly laminated fine grained

sandstone, well developed, slightly fractured, medium strength,
slightly weathered.
100%
TCR
89%
RQD
-19.0
SW
23.50: DB
23.55: DB
23.81: BG, 0, IR, RF
Is(50)
a=0.43
d=0.43
MPa
24.0
24.22: BG, 0, IR, RF
-20.0
24.72, DB
UCS Is(50)
6.6 a=0.54
MPa d=0.37
MPa
25.0
24.97: BG, 0, IR, RF
25.30
-21.0
26.0
-22.0
27.0
-23.0
28.0
-24.0
29.0
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Borehole: BH09
Depth: 14.50 25.30 m
Date: 09.06.2012 10.06.2012
HOLE NO: BH10
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352925, N: 6313181 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
Sandy CLAY: Dark brown, low plasticity, fine grained sand, some organics,
trace silt, moist, soft, topsoil.
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
M
0.45m
ALLUVIUM
Clayey SAND: Brown, fine to medium grained sand, some silt, moist, loose,
alluvium.
1.00m
SPT
3, 4, 4
N=8
4.0
1.0
1.45m
1.60m
D
1.90m
3.0
2.0
Sandy CLAY: Brown, medium plasticity, fine to medium grained sand, some
silt, wet, very soft, alluvium.
AD/T
2.50m
SPT
0, 0, 0
N=0
2.50: SPT pushed with hammer

W
2.95m
2.0
3.0
3.50m
D
3.80m
4.00m
SPT
1, 2, 5
N=7
1.0
4.0
0.0
5.0
SAND: Grey - brown, fine to medium grained, some silt, trace clay, wet, loose,
alluvium.
4.45m
- As above, no clay
5.50m
SPT
1, 4, 4
N=8
- As above, with trace silt, trace organics (decomposed wood)
5.95m
-1.0
6.0
7.00m
SPT
1, 1, 8
N=9
-2.0
7.0
-3.0
8.0
- As above, becoming grey, trace organics (decomposed leaves)
WB
7.45m
8.50m
SPT
5, 7, 7
N=14
8.95m
-4.0
9.0
9.60m
SAND: Grey, medium to coarse grained, trace silt, wet, loose, alluvium.
W
10.00m
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH10
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 2 OF 2
POSITION : E: 352925, N: 6313181 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
SPT
0, 4, 3
N=7
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
ALLUVIUM
SAND: Grey, medium to coarse grained, trace silt, wet, loose, alluvium.
(continued)
10.45m
W
-6.0
11.0
11.50m
SPT
3, 7, 9
N=16
- As above, with trace organics (decomposed wood), becoming medium dense
11.95m
-7.0
12.0
- As above, with some fine sub-angular to rounded gravel

W
13.00m
SPT
2, 6, 13
N=19
-8.0
13.0
- As above, becoming fine to coarse grained, trace organics (decomposed

wood)
WB
13.45m
13.80m
-9.0
14.0
-10.0
15.0
RESIDUAL SOIL
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled dark red, high plasticity, trace fine grained sand,
wet, very stiff, residual soil.
14.50m
SPT
3, 8, 9
N=17
14.95m
16.00m
-11.0
SPT
5, 7, 11
N=18
16.0
16.45m
-12.0
17.0
17.10m
BEDROCK
CLAYSTONE: Dark red, extremely weathered, extremely low strength

17.50m
SPT
16, 28,
24/90mm
N=R
17.89m
-13.0
19.00m
-14.0
SPT
17,
31/135mm
HB N=R
19.29m
18.0
19.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS
19.00m

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH10
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
1000
100
10
Is(50)
19.0
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-14.0
-10
18.0
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
UCS (ITS)
-13.0
-3
17.0
EH
-12.0
-1
16.0
VH
-11.0
-0.3
15.0
-10.0
-0.1
14.0
-9.0
-0.03
13.0
-8.0
- Axial
- Diametral
VL
12.0
Weathering
-7.0
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
EL
11.0
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC
LOG
-6.0
CHECKED BY : SRR

and comments

CLAYSTONE: Dark red, slightly fractured, extremely weathered,
low strength.
EW
0%
TCR
NMLC
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 3 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352925, N: 6313181 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
19.48: DB
Is(50)
a=0.11
d=0.15
MPa
0%
RQD
Run 1
19.94: JT, 65, PR, RF
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
HOLE NO: BH10
ROCK LOG
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90

DRILLING
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
1000
100
10
Is(50)
DEFECTS & COMMENTS

COMMENTS
NATURAL
FRACTURE
(mm)
-3
-1
-0.3
-0.1
-10
EH
VH
VL
-0.03
- Axial
- Diametral
EL
Weathering
CLAYSTONE: Dark red, slightly fractured, extremely weathered,

low strength. (continued)
ESTIMATED STRENGTH
Is(50)
UCS (ITS)
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC
LOG
DRILL
DEPTH
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
FIELD TESTS
TCR/RQD
PAGE : 4 OF 4
POSITION : E: 352925, N: 6313181 ( MGA94)
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL

and comments
EW
0%
TCR
20.43: DB
20.57: DB
0%
RQD
20.55
Run 2
20.75: DB
-16.0
21.0
-17.0
22.0
-18.0
23.0
89%
TCR
0%
RQD
Is(50)
a=0.07
d=0.13
MPa
CORE LOSS 0.28m (22.72-23.00)
NMLC
23.00
Run 3
As above
100%
TCR
23.43: DB
37%
RQD
SANDSTONE: Pale grey, fine to medium grained, occasional

siltstone/claystone lamination, well developed, slightly fractured,
moderately weathered, medium strength.
23.80
-19.0
-20.0
Run 4
MW
23.67: BG, 0, PR, RF
Is(50)
a=0.81
d=0.85
MPa
Is(50)
a=0.72
d=0.17
MPa
24.0
24.05: BG, 5, PR, RF

24.21: JT, 20, PR, RF
24.37: JT, 80, IR, RF
24.52: DB
25.0
25.07: BG, 0, IR, RF
UCS Is(50)
22.5 a=0.58
MPa d=0.49
MPa
100%
TCR
80%
RQD
-21.0
25.31: BG, 0, PR, RF
25.95: BG, 5, IR, RF
26.0
26.60: BG, 0, IR< RF
26.90
-22.0
27.0
-23.0
28.0
-24.0
29.0
DRILLING
NMLC NMLC Coring
NQ NQ Coring
HQ
PQ
HQ Coring
PQ Coring

GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
W Water Sample
EW Env Water Sample
SPT SPT Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
Cu Curved
DB Drill Break
SN Stain
PR Planar
ST Stepped
JT Joint
Un Undulated
IS Infilled Seam
POL Polished
SZ Shear Zone
RF Rough
VN Vein
S Smooth
SL Slickensided

0.03-0.1 Very Low
0.1-0.3 Low
0.3-1.0 Medium
1.0-3.0 High
3.0-10 Very High
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Borehole: BH10
Depth: 19.00 26.90 m
Date: 31.07.2012 01.08.2012
HOLE NO: BH11
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 3
POSITION : E: 352985, N: 6313084 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 27/7/12 to 30/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
Sandy CLAY: Dark brown, low plasticity, fine to medium grained sand, some
silt, trace fine to medium sub-angular gravel, trace orgaincs, dry, soft, topsoil.
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
0.30m
Silty CLAY: Brown mottled orange/dark grey, medium plasticity, trace fine
grained sand, moist, stiff.
1.00m
SPT
5, 7, 8
N=15
3.6
1.0
1.45m
1.60m
D
- As above, becoming brown

1.90m
2.00m
SPT
0, 0, 3
N=3
2.6
2.0
ALLUVIUM
Sandy CLAY: pale grey mottled brown/orange, medium plasticity, fine grained
sand, some silt, wet, soft, alluvium.
W
AD/T
2.45m
2.50m
D
2.70m
3.00m
SPT
4, 7, 6
N=13
SAND: Pale grey mottled brown/orange, fine to medium grained, trace clay,
wet, medium dense, alluvium.
1.6
3.0
3.45m
4.00m
SPT
3, 2, 1
N=3
0.6
4.0
-0.4
5.0
-1.4
6.0
-2.4
7.0
- As above, becoming pale grey, very loose
4.45m
5.00m
SPT
1, 4, 5
N=9
- As above, becoming grey-brown, loose
5.45m
6.00m
SPT
5, 8, 11
N=19
- As above, becoming brown, medium dense
6.45m
WB
7.00m
SPT
6, 8, 5
N=13
- As above, becoming grey-brown, trace silt
7.45m
7.60m
SAND: Grey - brown, fine to coarse grained, some fine sub-rounded gravel,
trace silt, wet, loose, alluvium.
8.00m
SPT
4, 4, 5
N=9
-3.4
8.0
8.45m
9.00m
SPT
3, 5, 6
N=11
-4.4
9.0
9.45m
W
10.00m
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH11
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 2 OF 3
POSITION : E: 352985, N: 6313084 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 27/7/12 to 30/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
SPT
8, 9, 7
N=16
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
ALLUVIUM
SAND: Grey - brown, fine to coarse grained, some fine sub-rounded gravel,
trace silt, wet, loose, alluvium. (continued)
10.45m
W
-6.4
11.0
- As above, with some clay, loose
11.50m
SPT
4, 3, 1
N=4
11.95m
-7.4
12.0
12.10m
PEAT: Black - dark grey, some clay, trace fine grained sand, wet, firm, organic.
13.00m
SPT
1, 3, 4
N=7
-8.4
13.0
- As above, with decomposed wood
13.45m
13.80m
WB
Silty CLAY: Grey - dark grey, high plasticity, trace fine grained sand, wet, soft.
-9.4
14.0
-10.4
15.0
14.50m
U75
14.95m
16.00m
-11.4
SPT
0, 0, 3
N=3
16.0
16.45m
-12.4
17.0
-13.4
18.0
17.50m
U75
17.95m
18.80m
19.00m
-14.4
SPT
6, 12, 20
N=32
19.0
SAND: Grey - dark grey, fine to medium grained, some clay, wet, dense,
alluvium.
19.45m
- As above, trace clay
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH11
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 3 OF 3
POSITION : E: 352985, N: 6313084 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 27/7/12 to 30/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
ALLUVIUM
SAND: Grey - dark grey, fine to medium grained, some clay, wet, dense,
alluvium. (continued)
20.50m
SPT
13, 20,
24 N=44
20.95m
WB
-16.4
22.00m
-17.4
SPT
8, 15, 12
N=27
21.0
22.0
- As above, becoming brown, medium dense
22.45m
W
-18.4
23.0
23.50m
SPT
19, 25,
10 N=35
- As above, becoming grey-brown, fine to coarse grained, dense

W
23.95m
23.95m
-19.4
24.0
-20.4
25.0
-21.4
26.0
-22.4
27.0
-23.4
28.0
-24.4
29.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
HOLE NO: BH12
SOIL LOG
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 353032, N: 6313017 ( MGA94)
DIP / AZIMUTH : 90
DATE DRILLED : 27/7/12 to 27/7/12
LOGGED BY : DA
CHECKED BY : SRR
Silty CLAY: Dark brown, low plasticity, fine to medium grained sand, some silt,
organics, dry, soft, topsoil.
0.40m
D
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
VSt / VD
St / D
CONSISTENCY /
RELATIVE
DENSITY
S/L
F / MD
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
SPT DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
DRILLING &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
D
0.60m
Silty CLAY: Brown/grey mottled pale brown/orange, medium plasticity, trace

fine sub-angular gravel, moist, stiff.
1.00m
SPT
4, 5, 6
N=11
3.4
1.0
1.45m
1.60m
1.70m
D
2.00m
SPT
2, 3, 5
N=8
ALLUVIUM
Sandy CLAY: pale grey/brown, medium plasticity, trace silt, moist, firm,
alluvium.
2.4
2.0
- As above, becoming pale grey mottled orange

M
2.45m
AD/T
2.80m
3.00m
U50
1.4
3.0
Silty CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange/dark red, high plasticity, trace fine
grained sand, wet, stiff, alluvium.
3.45m
4.00m
SPT
5, 8, 12
N=20
0.4
4.0
-0.6
5.0
4.45m
4.70m
D
5.00m
SPT
3, 7, 12
N=19
5.00: SPT Recovery: 0m

W
5.45m
6.00m
U50
-1.6
6.0
6.45m
6.60m
Sandy CLAY: Pale grey, medium plasticity, fine to medium grained sand, some
silt, wet, stiff, alluvium.
7.00m
SPT
4, 4, 7
N=11
-2.6
7.0
7.45m
7.45m
-3.6
8.0
-4.6
9.0
DRILLING
HA Hand Auger
HQ HQ Coring
AS Auger
NQ NQ Coring
WB Washbore
PQ PQ Coring
RR Rock Rolling
NMLC NMLC Coring
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS

D Disturbed Sample
SPT SPT Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
W Water Sample
MOISTURE CONDITION
HV Hand Vane Shear
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY (N-value)
Very Loose
0-4
Loose
4 - 10
Dense
30 - 50
Very Dense
50 - 100
Compact
>50/150mm

VS Very Soft
< 12 kPa {0-2}
S
Soft
12 - 25 {2-4}
F
Firm
25 - 50 {4-8}
St
Stiff
50 - 100 {8-15}
VSt Very Stiff
100 - 200 {15-30}
H
Hard
> 200 kPa {>30}
C3:
Test pit logs

55
TEST PIT LOG
HOLE NO:
TP01
PROJECT : HW10 & MR335 Intersection Upgrade
JOB NO : NB11462
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 352624, N: 6313536 ( MGA94)
EQUIPMENT TYPE : Kubota U45-3 (track)
CONTRACTOR : Ken Coles Excavations (Chris Kay) BUCKET WIDTH : 0.45m
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
20
15
10
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
FIELD DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
DCP
(blows/150mm)
CHECKED BY : SRR
CONSISTENCY/DENSITY
LOGGED BY : DA
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
EXCAVATION &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
Silty Sandy CLAY: Dark brown, low plasticity, fine grained sand, trace fine
sub-angular gravel, some organics, roots, dry, stiff, topsoil.
0.30m
ES
0.30: PP = 95 KPa
D
3.9
St
0.5
0.60m
D-x 2
0.60: PP = 140 KPa
0.90m
1.00m
ES
3.4
1.0
ALLUVIUM
Sandy CLAY: Orange - brown mottled grey/red, low plasticity, fine to medium
grained sand, some fine to medium sub-angular to rounded gravel, moist, very
stiff to hard, alluvium.
1.10: PP = 255 KPa

1.30m
B
2.9
1.5
2.4
2.0
1.9
2.5
St - H
MD - D
2.10m
D-x 2
2.60m
D-x 2
2.70m
SAND: Pale grey, fine to medium grained, wet, alluvium, medium dense to
dense, alluvium.
3.00m
D
1.4
3.0
3.30m
SKM AGS REV2_DA.GLB Log SKM TEST PIT LOG NB11462_SOIL.GPJ <<DrawingFile>> 23/10/2012 16:04
Test pit terminated at 3.30 m, target depth
N
E
BH
EXCAVATION
Natural/Existing cutting B
Excavator
R
Backhoe Bucket
0.9
3.5
0.4
4.0
-0.1
4.5
Buldozer
Ripper
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS
= Water level (during excavation)
= Water inflow

B Bulk Sample
D Small Disturbed Sample
W Water Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
HV Hand Vane Shear (P: Peak Su, R: Residual Su)
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY
Very Loose
Loose
Medium Dense
Dense
Very Dense
Compact
VS
S
F
St
VSt
H
CONSISTENCY (Su)
Very Soft (0-12.5kPa)
Soft
(12.5-25kPa)
Firm
(25-50kPa)
Stiff
(50-100kPa)
Very Stiff (100-200kPa)
Hard
(>200kPa)
MOISTURE CONDITION
File: NB11462 TP01 Page 1 OF 1
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Test Pit: TP01

Depth: 3.30 m
Date: 09.08.2012
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Test Pit: TP01

Depth: 3.30 m
Date: 09.08.2012
TEST PIT LOG
HOLE NO:
TP02
JOB NO : NB11462
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 352754, N: 6313432 ( MGA94)
FILL
Silty CLAY: Brown mottled dark brown/orange/grey, low plasticity, some fine
grained sand, trace fine to medium sub-angular gravel, occasional
brick/plastics/material, moist, stiff, fill.
0.30m
ES
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
20
15
10
MOISTURE
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
FIELD DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
DCP
(blows/150mm)
CHECKED BY : SRR
CONSISTENCY/DENSITY
LOGGED BY : DA
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
EXCAVATION &
WATER
DETAIL
St
0.40: PP = 120 KPa

3.8
0.5
0.60m
D-x 2
0.70m
Silty CLAY: Dark brown, low plasticity, some fine grained sand, roots, moist,
stiff, fill.
1.00m
ES
1.10m
B
0.80: PP = 140 KPa

M
3.3
St
1.0
1.20m
ALLUVIUM
Sandy CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange/red, low plasticity, fine to medium
grained sand, trace silt, moist, very stiff, alluvium.
2.8
1.30: PP = 220 KPa
1.5
VSt
VSt
1.90m
B
2.3
2.0
1.8
2.5
- As above, becoming wet
2.80m
D-x 2
1.3
3.0
3.20m
Test pit terminated at 3.20 m, target depth
N
E
BH
EXCAVATION
Excavator
R
Backhoe Bucket
0.8
3.5
0.3
4.0
-0.2
4.5
Buldozer
Ripper
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS
= Water inflow

B Bulk Sample
W Water Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY
Very Loose
Loose
Medium Dense
Dense
Very Dense
Compact
VS
S
F
St
VSt
H
CONSISTENCY (Su)
Soft
(12.5-25kPa)
Firm
(25-50kPa)
Stiff
(50-100kPa)
Hard
(>200kPa)
MOISTURE CONDITION
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Test Pit: TP02

Depth: 3.20 m
Date: 09.08.2012
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Test Pit: TP02

Depth: 3.20 m
Date: 09.08.2012
TEST PIT LOG
HOLE NO:
TP03
JOB NO : NB11462
PAGE : 1 OF 1
POSITION : E: 352803, N: 6313405 ( MGA94)
St VSt
GRAPHIC
LOG
RL (m)
DEPTH (m)
SAMPLES &
FIELD DATA
% Fines
Atterberg
Limits
Dry Density
COMMENTS
Field Test Data
20
15
10
Sandy CLAY: Dark brown, low plasticity, fine grained sand, some silt, trace
organics, dry, firm, topsoil.
DCP
(blows/150mm)

CONSISTENCY/DENSITY
CHECKED BY : SRR
MOISTURE
LOGGED BY : DA
LAB DATA
Moisture Content
EXCAVATION &
WATER
DETAIL
TOPSOIL
0.15m
Silty CLAY: Dark grey mottled orange, medium plasticity, some fine grained
sand, trace organics, roots, moist, stiff to very stiff.
0.30m
ES
0.50m
D-x 2
3.4
0.5
0.50: PP = 240 KPa
0.70m
2.9
Sandy CLAY: Pale grey mottled orange/brown, low plasticity, fine to medium
grained sand, some silt, rootlets, moist, stiff, alluvium.
ALLUVIUM
1.10: PP = 140 KPa
0.80: PP = 160 KPa
1.0
1.20m
ES
1.30m
B
St
MD
- As above, becoming wet

2.4
1.5
1.90m
2.00m
D-x 2
N
E
BH
EXCAVATION
Excavator
R
Backhoe Bucket
1.9
1.4
2.5
0.9
3.0
0.4
3.5
-0.1
4.0
-0.6
4.5
Buldozer
Ripper
GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS
= Water inflow
2.0
SAND: Grey mottled orange/brown, fine to medium grained, trace clay, trace
silt, wet, medium dense, alluvium.
2.50m
Test pit terminated at 2.50 m, collapse

B Bulk Sample
W Water Sample
ES Env Soil Sample
EW Env Water Sample
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTES
YES
NO
VL
L
MD
D
VD
CO
DENSITY
Very Loose
Loose
Medium Dense
Dense
Very Dense
Compact
VS
S
F
St
VSt
H
CONSISTENCY (Su)
Soft
(12.5-25kPa)
Firm
(25-50kPa)
Stiff
(50-100kPa)
Hard
(>200kPa)
MOISTURE CONDITION
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Test Pit: TP03

Depth: 2.50 m
Date: 09.08.2012
Client: RMS
Job No: NB11462
Test Pit: TP03

Depth: 2.50 m
Date: 09.08.2012
C4:
Cone Penetration Test (CPTu)

56
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]
Very stiff sand to clayey sand (8)
Silty sand to sandy silt (5)
Very stiff fine grained (9)

1.7
Clays; clay to silty clay (3)

Clayey silt to silty clay (4)
Clean sands to silty sands (6)
5.0

10.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Sleeve area [cm2]: 150
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT01
Date:
Sinclair Knight Merz
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
3/7/2012
Page:
Pacific Hwy & Wyong Rd Intersection
1 : 50
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT01.CPT
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]
1.0
5.0

10.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT02
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
3/7/2012
Page:
1 : 50
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT02.CPT
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]

0.8


5.0


10.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT03
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
3/7/2012
Page:
1 : 50
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT03.CPT
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]

0.5


5.0

10.0
15.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT04
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
3/7/2012
Page:
1 : 75
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT04.CPT
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]

1.6

5.0

10.0
15.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT05
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
3/7/2012
Page:
1 : 75
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT05.CPT
10
Shear strength [kPa] >>

10
20
30
40
Depth 2.000 [m].
50
Torque [Nm]
0
0
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Angle [deg]
Shear strength = 30.36 [kPa], Max. torque = 38.78 [Nm], Rod friction = 8.21 [Nm]
1,800
Torque [Nm]
Depth [m]
Depth 2.001 [m]. Remoulded.
3
10 9
7 6 5 4 3
<< Sensitivity
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Angle [deg]
Remoulded Shear strength = 16.66 [kPa]
1,400
1,600
1,800
Location
Position
Tuggerah
Project ID
Ground level
X = 0, Y = 0
Client
G09/674
CPT05
Date
Project
Scale
03/07/2012
Page

Vane type & size
Borehole ID.
1:25
Fig.
1/2
File
Rectangular end, 13.0 x 6.5cm
CPT05.vct
Torque [Nm]
Depth 2.000 [m].

40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Time [s]
1,100
1,200
1,100
1,200
Torque [Nm]

40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Time [s]
Location
900
1,000
Position
Tuggerah
Project ID
Ground level
X = 0, Y = 0
Client
G09/674
CPT05
Date
Project
Scale
03/07/2012
Page

Vane type & size
Borehole ID.
1:25
Fig.
1/1
File
CPT05.vct
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]


Gravelly sand to sand (7)
5.0



10.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT06
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
5/7/2012
Page:
1 : 50
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT06.CPT
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]




5.0

10.0


Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT07
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
5/7/2012
Page:
1 : 50
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT07.cpt
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]



5.0

10.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT08
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
5/7/2012
Page:
1 : 50
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT08.CPT
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]



5.0

10.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
CPT08A
Scale:
5/7/2012
Page:
1 : 50
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT08a.CPT
10
-100
0
-50
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Dissipation depth = 2.41 m

Dissipated value u2 = 21.00 kPa
Dissipation time = 3097.20 s
10
100
1000
Time [s]
10000
86400
Dissipation [kPa]
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT09
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
4/7/2012
Page:
1 : 100
Fig:
2/2
File:
CPT09.cpd
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]

5.0

10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT09
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
4/7/2012
Page:
1 : 100
Fig:
1/2
File:
CPT09.cpd
10
-100
0
-50
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400

10
100
1000
Time [s]
10000
86400
Dissipation [kPa]
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT10
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
4/7/2012
Page:
1 : 100
Fig:
2/3
File:
CPT10.CPT
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900

10
100
1000
Time [s]
10000
86400
Dissipation [kPa]
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT10
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
4/7/2012
Page:
1 : 100
Fig:
3/3
File:
CPT10.CPT
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]

5.0
10.0
Sensitive, fine grained (1)
Organic soils-peats (2)
15.0

20.0
25.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT10
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
4/7/2012
Page:
1 : 100
Fig:
1/3
File:
CPT10.CPT
10
qc [MPa]
Classification by
Robertson 1990
10
fs [MPa]
20
30
40
500
0
0.5 1.0
qc [MPa]
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.2
u2 [MPa]
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 0
0.4
Rf [%]
0.8
1.2
1.6
Depth [m]

5.0


10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Location:
U2
Position:
Tuggerah
Project ID:
Client:
G09/674
Cone No: 4382
Tip area [cm2]: 10
Ground level:
X: 0.00 m, Y: 0.00 m
CPT11
Date:
Project:
Test no:
0.00
Scale:
4/7/2012
Page:
1 : 100
Fig:
1/1
File:
CPT11.CPT
10
Shear strength [kPa] >>

20
40
60
80
Depth 2.700 [m].
100
Torque [Nm]
0
0
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Angle [deg]
Torque [Nm]
Depth [m]
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
50
100
150
200
Angle [deg]
250
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
<< Sensitivity
Location
Position
Tuggerah
Project ID
Ground level
X = 0, Y = 0
Client
G09/674
CPT11
Date
Project
Scale
04/07/2012
Page

Vane type & size
Borehole ID.
1:25
Fig.
1/2
File
CPT11.vct
Torque [Nm]
Depth 2.700 [m].

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Time [s]
900
1,000
900
1,000
Torque [Nm]

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time [s]
Location
700
800
Position
Tuggerah
Project ID
Ground level
X = 0, Y = 0
Client
G09/674
CPT11
Date
Project
Scale
04/07/2012
Page

Vane type & size
Borehole ID.
1:25
Fig.
1/1
File
CPT11.vct
C5:
Monitoring well construction record

57
MONITORINGWELLCONSTRUCTIONRECORD
ProjectName
Location
InstalledBy
InspectedBy
HW10&MR335IntersectionUpgrade
Tuggerah,NSW
TerratestPty.Ltd.
DavidAndrew
BoreID
ProjectNo.
DateInstalled
DatePurged
BH07
NB11462
26.07.2012
09.08.2012
GroundElevation:5.077m
Depthbelowground:0.00m
:Monument
Typeofsurfacecasing
Typeofsurfaceseal :Cement
Depthofsurfaceseal:0.25m
Internalandexternal :Int;45 mm,Ext;
diameter,andtypeof 50mm&Class9Upvc
RiserPipe
Depthtotopseal :13.65m
Depthtobottomseal :14.15 m
Typeofseal :Benonite
Typeofbackfill
Typefilterpack
: Arisings
:Sand(1 2mm)
Diameterandtypeof :50mm(EZEScreen)
screen
Screenslotwidth
Depthtotop ofscreen
:400m
:14.65 m
Comments:
:20.65m
Depthtobottomofscreen
Depthtobottomofhole:22.10m
Diameterdrilled:110mm
ProjectName
Location
InstalledBy
InspectedBy
Tuggerah,NSW
TerratestPty.Ltd.
DavidAndrew
BoreID
ProjectNo.
DateInstalled
DatePurged
BH10
NB11462
01.08.2012
09.08.2012
:GaticCover
Typeofsurfacecasing
RiserPipe
Depthtotopseal :19.90 m
Typeofbackfill
Typefilterpack
: Arisings
:Sand(1 2mm)
screen
Screenslotwidth
Depthtotop ofscreen
:400m
:20.90 m
Comments:
:26.90m
ProjectName
Location
InstalledBy
InspectedBy
Tuggerah,NSW
TerratestPty.Ltd.
DavidAndrew
BoreID
ProjectNo.
DateInstalled
DatePurged
BH11
NB11462
30.07.2012
09.08.2012
:GaticCover
Typeofsurfacecasing
RiserPipe
Depthtotopseal :7.00 m
Typeofbackfill
Typefilterpack
: Arisings
:Sand(1 2mm)
screen
Screenslotwidth
Depthtotop ofscreen
:400m
:8.00 m
Comments:
:14.00m
C6:
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)

58
DYNAMICCONEPENETROMETER
Client:
Project:
JobNo:
Location:
RMS
NB11462
Tuggerah,NSW
TestID
Date
Depth(m)
Top
Bottom
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.70
0.80
0.80
0.90
0.90
1.00
1.00
1.10
1.10
1.20
1.20
1.30
1.30
1.40
1.40
1.50
1.50
1.60
1.60
1.70
1.70
1.80
1.80
1.90
1.90
2.00
2.00
2.10
2.10
2.20
2.20
2.30
2.30
2.40
2.40
2.50
2.50
2.60
2.60
2.70
2.70
2.80
2.80
2.90
2.90
3.00
3.00
3.10
3.10
3.20
3.20
3.30
3.30
3.40
3.40
3.50
3.50
3.60
3.60
3.70
3.70
3.80
3.80
3.90
3.90
4.00
4.00
4.10
4.10
4.20
4.20
4.30
4.30
4.40
4.40
4.50
4.50
4.60
4.60
4.70
4.70
4.80
4.80
4.90
4.90
5.00
Tested:
Checked:
Standard:
SinclairKnightMerz
Geotechnical
100ChristieStreet
StLeonards,NSW2065Australia
DA
SRR
AS12896.3.2
TP01
TP02
TP03
09.08.2012 09.08.2012 09.08.2012
Numberofblowsper100mm
3
2
6
6
10
11
6
4
5
5
7
10
9
13
9
12
16
11
10
14
12
14
16
18
17
18
20
15
13
12
7
6
12
4
5
7
5
5
3
4
7
7
6
4
5
7
8
8
7
7
7
6
4
4
7
8
7
8
8
8
8
7
8
8
7
3
3
5
8
11
10
7
6
6
6
5
3
6
7
7
8
5
6
6
8
8
7
6
6
4
Notes:
\\dmca.skmconsulting.com\sites\NB11462\DmcaConsult\Technical\Geotechnical\Logs\NB11462_DCP.xlsm
Appendix D Laboratory test certificates

D1:
Mechanical
D2:
Chemical

59
D1:
Mechanical

60
TEST CERTIFICATE
This document is issued by the Company subject to its General Conditions of Service (www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm). Attention is drawn to the limitations of liability, indemnification and jurisdictional issues established therein.
This document is to be treated as an original within the meaning of UCP 600. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits of client's
instructions, if any. The company's sole responsibility it to its client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or
falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499
SGS Australia Pty Ltd

Unit 15, 33 Maddox Street
(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
SOIL CLASSIFICATION TEST DATA

CLIENT:
PO Box 164 St Leonards NSW 1590
Wyong Road Interchange - NB11462
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74414
Sample
Source
BH01
5.00m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAY: brown.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
N = Natural State With No Sieving
Sample History: AD = Air Dried
OD = Oven Dried at 50oC
N = Natural State As Received
Test Method: RTA T113
PF-(AU)-[IND(MTE)]-(GEN)-RPT-607.VER1.09.02.2011 Page 1 of 1
61
41
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
21.8.12
This document is issued in accordance with NATAs accreditation requirements
Accreditation No. 2418
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74416
Sample
Source
Sample Description
CLAYEY SAND: dark-brown.

BH03
1.70-2.50m
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
14.0
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
26
16
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
21.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 29.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74417
Sample
Source
BH04
3.50m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAY: brown.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
17.6
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
63
44
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
22.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74420
Sample
Source
BH10
2.5m
Sample Description
CLAYEY SAND: brown.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
11.8
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
25
10
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
22.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74423
Sample
Source
BH10
14.50m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAY: red-brown/ grey.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
31.0
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
49
31
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
22.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74424
Sample
Source
BH11
14.5m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAY: brown.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
55
35
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
21.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74425
Sample
Source
BH11
17.5m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAY: brown.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
52
28
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
21.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74428
Sample
Source
BH12
3.0m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAY: grey.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
56
39
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
22.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74427
Sample
Source
BH12
7.0m
Sample Description
CLAYEY SAND: brown-grey.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
16.7
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
24
13
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
22.8.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Chris Lloyd
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74472
Sample
Source
TP01
0.6m
Sample Description
GRAVELLY CLAY:dark grey.
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
11.6
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
32
15
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230611
Date Tested:
4.09.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Aaron Lacey
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74473
Sample
Source
TP01
1.30m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAYEY SANDY

GRAVEL:brown/yellow
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
10.3
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
35
25
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230611
Date Tested:
4.09.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Aaron Lacey
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74474
Sample
Source
TP02
0.60m
Sample Description
GRAVELLY SILTY
CLAY:brown/red/white
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
17.4
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
35
22
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230611
Date Tested:
4.09.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Aaron Lacey
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74475
Sample
Source
TP02
1.90m
Sample Description
SILTY CLAYEY SAND:brown/yellow/grey
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
22.3
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
25
10
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230611
Date Tested:
4.09.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Aaron Lacey
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:
Lab
Number
74476
Sample
Source
TP03
1.30m
Sample Description
Moisture
Content
(%)
1
Dry
Density
19.6
NOTES TO TESTING
1
Test Method:
2
Test Method:
3
Test Method:
4
Preparation:
RTA T120
RTA T108
RTA T109
DS = Dry Sieved
WS = Wet Sieved
30
17
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230611
Date Tested:
4.09.12
Plastic
Index
(t/m3)
Aaron Lacey
Approved Signatory:
Liquid
Limit
Preparation
&
History
4
Linear
Shrink.
(%)
5
DS
AD
Date: 12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
This document is to be treated as an original within the meaning of UCP 600. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits
of client's instructions, if any. The company's sole responsibility it to its client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. Any unauthorized
alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1
1230170
BH03 (1.70-2.50m)
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74416
20.8.12
CL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Approved Signatory:
Gravel

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
Hydrometer Type:
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Loss on Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Sand
% Passing
100
99
98
96
95
91
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
88
85
81
74
45
33
N/A
N/A
None
None
Chris Lloyd

Date:
23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1/ 3
1230170
BH05 (5.00m)
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74414
21.8.12
CL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Sand
Gravel
SILTY CLAY: brown.

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
% Passing
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
100
99
97
93
82
70
61
52
Hydrometer Type:
ASTM 152H
Dispersant Type:
Sodium Hexametaphosphate
Pretreatment:
Loss on Pretreatment: None
Remarks:
Approved Signatory:
Chris Lloyd

Date:
23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1
1230170
BH10 (7.00m)
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74421
20.8.12
CL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Approved Signatory:
Gravel
SAND: brown.
Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
Hydrometer Type:
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Loss on Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Sand
% Passing
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
100
99
97
84
29
10
N/A
N/A
None
None
Chris Lloyd

Date:
23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1/ 3
1230170
BH11 (14.50m)
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74424
21.8.12
CL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Sand
Gravel
SILTY CLAY: brown.

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
% Passing
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
99
99
99
99
98
98
96
87
74
60
49
100
Hydrometer Type:
ASTM 152H
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Approved Signatory:
Chris Lloyd

Date:
23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1/ 3
1230170
BH11 (17.50m)
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74425
21.8.12
CL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Sand
Gravel
SILTY CLAY: brown.

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
% Passing
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
100
99
94
81
70
55
41
Hydrometer Type:
ASTM 152H
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Approved Signatory:
Chris Lloyd

Date:
23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1/ 3
1230170
BH12 (3.00m)
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74428
21.8.12
CL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Sand
Gravel
SILTY CLAY: grey.

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
% Passing
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
100
99
96
83
74
72
64
60
57
52
Hydrometer Type:
ASTM 152H
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Approved Signatory:
Chris Lloyd

Date:
23.8.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1/ 3
1230611
TP01 1.30m
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74473
6.9.12
JL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Sand
Gravel
SILTY CLAYEY SANDY GRAVEL:brown/yellow

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
% Passing
100
100
100
100
100
99
98
95
91
85
79
69
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
66
64
61
58
50
45
44
39
37
33
28
Hydrometer Type:
ASTM 152H
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Approved Signatory:
Chris Lloyd

Date:
12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1/ 3
1230611
TP02 1.90m
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74475
6.9.12
JL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Sand
Gravel

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
% Passing
100
100
99
99
97
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
97
96
96
93
59
35
32
25
23
20
19
Hydrometer Type:
ASTM 152H
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Approved Signatory:
Chris Lloyd

Date:
12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
Client:
Address:
Project:

Test Method:
Job Number:
Sample Source:
Sampled By:
AS 1289 3.6.1/ 3
1230611
TP03 1.30m
Client
Lab Number:
Date Tested:
Checked By:
74476
6.9.12
JL
100
90
80
% passing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
sieve aperture mm
Clay
Sample Description:
Silt
Sand
Gravel

Sieve Size (mm)
150.0
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
% Passing
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size (mm)

1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.150
0.075
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
% Passing
100
99
97
89
52
38
35
31
28
24
18
Hydrometer Type:
ASTM 152H
Dispersant Type:
Pretreatment:
Remarks:
Approved Signatory:
Chris Lloyd

Date:
12.9.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
DRY DENSITY/MOISTURE CONTENT RELATION

CLIENT: Sinclair Knight Merz
Dry Density t/m3
PROJECT: Wyong Road Interchange - NB11462
2.06
2.05
2.04
2.03
2.02
2.01
2.00
1.99
1.98
1.97
1.96
1.95
1.94
1.93
1.92
1.91
1.90
1.89
1.88
1.87
1.86
1.85
1.84
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.80
1.79
1.78
1.77
1.76
1.75
1.74
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
Moisture Content %
Job Number:
1230170
Laboratory Number:
74416
Sample Source:
BH03 1.7-2.5m
Sample Description: CLAYEY SAND: dark-brown.
Maximum Dry Density:
Optimum Moisture Content:
Oversize Material:
% Oversize:
Date Tested:
Sampled By:
Compactive Effort:
Test Method:
2.02
10.5
19
0
23.08.12
Client
Standard
RMS T111
Mould Type:
Number of Layers:
Blows per Layer:
Mass of Rammer:
Drop of Rammer:
Zero Air Voids Line - Particle Density:
Comments:
Approved Signatory:
t/m3
%
mm
%
A
3
25
2.7
300
2.70
kg
mm
t/m3
Aaron Lacey

Date:12.09.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

Dry Density t/m3
1.97
1.96
1.95
1.94
1.93
1.92
1.91
1.90
1.89
1.88
1.87
1.86
1.85
1.84
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.80
1.79
1.78
1.77
1.76
1.75
1.74
1.73
1.72
1.71
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
Moisture Content %
Job Number:
1230611
Laboratory Number:
74473
Sample Source:
TP01 / 1.30m
Sample Description: SILTY CLAYEY SANDY GRAVEL:brown/yellow
Oversize Material:
% Oversize:
Date Tested:
Sampled By:
Compactive Effort:
Test Method:
1.95
11.0
19
2
31.08.12
Client
Standard
RMS T111
Mould Type:
Number of Layers:
Blows per Layer:
Mass of Rammer:
Drop of Rammer:
Comments:
Approved Signatory:
t/m
%
mm
%
A
3
25
2.7
300
2.65
kg
mm
t/m3
Aaron Lacey

Date:12.09.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

1.84
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.80
Dry Density t/m3
1.79
1.78
1.77
1.76
1.75
1.74
1.73
1.72
1.71
1.70
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
Moisture Content %
Job Number:
1230611
Laboratory Number:
74475
Sample Source:
TP02 / 1.90m
Sample Description: SILTY CLAYEY SAND:brown/yellow/grey
Oversize Material:
% Oversize:
Date Tested:
Sampled By:
Compactive Effort:
Test Method:
1.82
13.5
19
0
31.08.12
Client
Standard
RMS T111
Mould Type:
Number of Layers:
Blows per Layer:
Mass of Rammer:
Drop of Rammer:
Comments:
Approved Signatory:
t/m3
%
mm
%
A
3
25
2.7
300
2.60
kg
mm
t/m3
Aaron Lacey

Date:12.09.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

1.90
1.89
1.88
1.87
Dry Density t/m3
1.86
1.85
1.84
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.80
1.79
1.78
1.77
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
Moisture Content %
Job Number:
1230611
Laboratory Number:
74476
Sample Source:
TP03 / 1.30m
Sample Description: SILTY CLAYEY SAND:brown/yellow/grey
Oversize Material:
% Oversize:
Date Tested:
Sampled By:
Compactive Effort:
Test Method:
1.88
13.0
19
0
31.08.12
Client
Standard
RMS T111
Mould Type:
Number of Layers:
Blows per Layer:
Mass of Rammer:
Drop of Rammer:
Comments:
Approved Signatory:
t/m3
%
mm
%
A
3
25
2.7
300
2.60
kg
mm
t/m3
Aaron Lacey

Date:12.09.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO

CLIENT:

PROJECT:
Sample Source:
Sample Description:
BH03 1.7-2.5m
Job Number:
Laboratory Number:
1230170
74416
CBR Value @ 2.5mm

CBR Value @ 5.0mm
25.0
30.0
(%)
(%)
100% of MDD at OMC

2.02
10.5
5.5
10
(t/m3)
(%)
(kg)
2.04
2.03
(t/m3)
(t/m3)
0% excluded
(%)
9.9
(%)
Laboratory Density Ratio
101.0
(%)
Laboratory Moisture Ratio
94.0
(%)
Top 30mm of Test Sample

Remainder of Test Sample
11.3
10.9
(%)
(%)
Swell After Soaking
0.1
(%)
Compactive Effort
Standard
Sample Data
Compaction Specification
Maximum Dry Density (MDD)
Optimum Moisture Content (OMC)
Mass of Surchages
Number of Days Soaked
Sample Preparation
Dry Density - Before Soaking
Dry Density - After Soaking
Retained on 19mm Sieve
Moisture Content - Before Soaking
Moisture Content - After Soaking
Number of Layers
Blows per Layer
Mass of Rammer
Drop of Rammer
3
53
2.7
300
Comments
Date Tested:
(kg)
(mm)
7.09.12
RMS T117
Standard Laboratory Method for a remoulded specimen.
Approved Signatory:
Aaron Lacey
Date:
12.09.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:

PROJECT:
Sample Source:
Sample Description:
TP01 / 1.30m
SILTY CLAYEY SANDY GRAVEL:brown/yellow
Job Number:
Laboratory Number:
1230611
74473
CBR Value @ 2.5mm

CBR Value @ 5.0mm
3.0
3.0
(%)
(%)
100% of MDD at OMC

1.95
11.0
5.5
10
(t/m3)
(%)
(kg)
1.95
1.91
(t/m3)
(t/m3)
2% excluded
(%)
10.9
(%)
100.0
(%)
99.0
(%)

16.2
12.2
(%)
(%)
Swell After Soaking
2.0
(%)
Compactive Effort
Standard
Sample Data
Mass of Surchages
Sample Preparation
3
53
2.7
300
Number of Layers
Blows per Layer
Mass of Rammer
Drop of Rammer
Comments
Date Tested:
(kg)
(mm)
7.09.12
RMS T117
Approved Signatory:
Aaron Lacey
Date:
17.09.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:

PROJECT:
Sample Source:
Sample Description:
TP02 / 1.90m
Job Number:
Laboratory Number:
1230611
74475
CBR Value @ 2.5mm

CBR Value @ 5.0mm
6.0
8.0
(%)
(%)
100% of MDD at OMC

1.82
13.5
5.5
10
(t/m3)
(%)
(kg)
1.83
1.82
(t/m3)
(t/m3)
0% excluded
(%)
13.6
(%)
101.0
(%)
101.0
(%)

15.7
15.0
(%)
(%)
Swell After Soaking
0.4
(%)
Compactive Effort
Standard
Sample Data
Mass of Surchages
Sample Preparation
Number of Layers
Blows per Layer
Mass of Rammer
Drop of Rammer
3
53
2.7
300
Comments
Date Tested:
(kg)
(mm)
7.09.12
RMS T117
Approved Signatory:
Aaron Lacey
Date:
17.09.12
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:

PROJECT:
Sample Source:
Sample Description:
TP03 / 1.30m
Job Number:
Laboratory Number:
1230611
74476
CBR Value @ 2.5mm

CBR Value @ 5.0mm
5.0
6.0
(%)
(%)
100% of MDD at OMC

1.88
13.0
5.5
10
(t/m3)
(%)
(kg)
1.88
1.88
(t/m3)
(t/m3)
0% excluded
(%)
13.2
(%)
100.0
(%)
101.0
(%)

14.3
13.8
(%)
(%)
Swell After Soaking
0.3
(%)
Compactive Effort
Standard
Sample Data
Mass of Surchages
Sample Preparation
Number of Layers
Blows per Layer
Mass of Rammer
Drop of Rammer
3
53
2.7
300
Comments
Date Tested:
(kg)
(mm)
7.09.12
RMS T117
Approved Signatory:
Aaron Lacey
Date:
17.09.12
This document is issued by the Company subject to its General Conditions of Service (www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm). Attention is drawn to the limitations of liability, indemnification and
jurisdictional issues established therein.
This document is to be treated as an original within the meaning of UCP 600. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its
intervention only and within the limits of client's instructions, if any. The company's sole responsibility it to its client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights
and obligations under the transaction documents. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest
extent of the law.

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499
Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test

AS 1289 6.4.2 Determination of compressive strength of soil
Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Disturbed / Undisturbed
Stage 2

BH01
BH01
74414
74414
5.00m
5.00m
6.8.12
6.8.12
Undisturbed
Undisturbed
Stage 3
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Undisturbed
Description of Specimen
SILTY CLAY: brown.
Initial Specimen Conditions

Height
mm
Diameter
mm
mm2
Area
cm3
Volume
Wet Mass
g
Dry Mass
g
t/m3
Wet Density
t/m3
Dry Density
Moisture Content
%
Degree of Saturation
%
Particle Density (assumed)
99.00
50.00
1963.50
194.39
368.06
303.20
1.89
1.56
21.4
81.10
2.65
Final Specimen Conditions

Moisture Content
%
t/m3
Wet Density
t/m3
Dry Density
26.7
2.05
1.62
Max Effective Principle Stress Ratio at Failure

Initial Effective Stress
kPa
75
150
300
733.16
870.53
1119.72
Axial Stress
kPa
84.16
146.53
244.72
Cor. Deviator Stress
kPa
618.03
649.15
719.60
Pore Water Pressure
kPa
Axial Strain
%
1.965
1.929
2.068
Effective Major Stress
kPa
115.13
221.38
400.12
Effective Minor Stress
kPa
30.97
74.85
155.40
Effective Stress Ratio
3.72
2.96
2.57
Shear Resistance Angle (deg)
23.0
based on effective stress interpreted from Mohr Circles
Cohesion c'
kPa
15.1
s'
kPa
73.05
148.12
277.76
t'
kPa
42.08
73.27
122.36
Failure Criteria
Failure criteria determined by the maximum principal effective stress ratio
Test Type
Multi-staged triaxial compression test with pore water pressure measurement
1

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Consolidation
Effective Pressure
Cell Pressure
Back Pressure
Consolidated Volume
Volumetric Strain
Consolidated Height
Consolidated Area
Stage 3
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
16.8.12
22.8.12
Yes
Yes
No
1
1
16.8.12
22.8.12
Yes
Yes
No
1
1
150.00
725.00
575.00
187.15
0.004903276
95.77
1954.30
301.00
876.00
575.00
183.71
0.00612887
92.94
1976.86

BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Test Setup
Date Started
Date Finished
Top Drain Used
Base Drain Used
Side Drains Used
Pressure System Number
Cell Number
Saturation
Cell Pressure Incr.
Back Pressure Incr.
Differential Pressure
Final Cell Pressure
Final Pore Pressure
Final B Value
Stage 2
16.8.12
22.8.12
Yes
Yes
No
1
1
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
74.00
71.00
13.00
584.00
569.09
0.97
kPa
kPa
kPa
cm3
75.00
650.00
575.00
189.94
0.007622289
98.25
1933.56
mm
mm2

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received

BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Stage 2
Stage 3
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Consolidation Stage
Square-root Time (min)

0
10
15
20
25
30
0
0.5
Volume Change (cc)
1
1.5
2
Stage 1
2.5
Stage 2
Stage 3
3
3.5
4
4.5
5

Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
650
575.09
0.01
725
575.05
0.01
875
575.02
0.01
1.951
736.70
85.70
118.67
32.97
3.599
75.82
42.85
23.0
15.1
2.233
874.08
149.08
226.51
77.43
2.925
151.97
74.54
23.0
15.1
2.247
1120.76
245.76
402.53
156.77
2.568
279.65
122.88
23.0
15.1

Axial Strain
(%)
1.965
733.16
Axial Stress
kPa
84.16
kPa
618.03
Pore Water Pressure
kPa
kPa
115.13
kPa
30.97
3.718
s'
kPa
73.05
t'
kPa
42.08
1.929
870.53
146.53
649.15
221.38
74.85
2.958
148.12
73.27
2.068
1119.72
244.72
719.60
400.12
155.40
2.575
277.76
122.36
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Shearing
Initial Cell Pressure
Initial Pore Pressure
Rate of Strain
Max Deviator Stress
Axial Strain
Axial Stress
Cor. Deviator stress
s'
t'
Shear Resistance Angle
Cohesion c'

BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
kPa
kPa
mm/min
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
degs
kPa

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received

BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Stage 2
Stage 3
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Shearing Stage
300
Deviator Stress (kPa)
250
200
Stage 1
Stage 2
150
Stage 3
100
50
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Axial Strain (%)
730
710
Pore Pressure (kPa)
690
670
Stage 1
650
Stage 2
630
Stage 3
610
590
570
550
0
0.5
1.5
Axial Strain (%)
2.5

Stage 1
Sample Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received

BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Stage 2
Stage 3
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Shearing Stage
Effective Principal Stress Ratio
3.5
3
2.5
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Axial Strain (%)
250
Shear Stress (kPa)
200
Stage 1
150
Stage 2
Stage 3
100
50
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Normal Effective Stress (kPa)
350
400
450

Stage 1
Sample Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12

BH01
74414
5.00m
6.8.12
Shearing Stage
140
Effective Shear Stress, s' (kPa)
120
100
80
Stage 1
Stage 2
60
Stage 3
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Normal Effective Stress, t' (kPa)
Mode of failure:
Plastic
Approved Signatory:
Date: 30.8.12
Chris Lloyd
extent of the law.

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2

BH11
BH11
74425
74425
17.50m
17.50m
6.8.12
6.8.12
Undisturbed
Undisturbed
Stage 3
BH11
74425
17.50m
6.8.12
Undisturbed
SILTY CLAY: brown.

Height
mm
Diameter
mm
mm2
Area
cm3
Volume
Wet Mass
g
Dry Mass
g
t/m3
Wet Density
t/m3
Dry Density
Moisture Content
%
%
150.40
72.30
4105.50
617.47
1132.31
807.41
1.83
1.31
40.2
103.87
2.65

Moisture Content
%
t/m3
Wet Density
t/m3
Dry Density
32.7
1.87
1.41

kPa
200
400
601
1082.78
1363.31
1648.20
Axial Stress
kPa
183.78
264.31
349.20
kPa
818.04
922.09
1068.64
Pore Water Pressure
kPa
Axial Strain
%
2.312
3.143
4.197
kPa
264.74
441.22
579.56
kPa
80.96
176.91
230.36
3.27
2.49
2.52
19.8
Cohesion c'
kPa
32.8
s'
kPa
172.85
309.06
404.96
t'
kPa
91.89
132.15
174.60
Failure Criteria
Failure criteria determined by the maximum principal effective stress ratio
Test Type
Multi-staged triaxial compression test with pore water pressure measurement
1

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Test Setup
Date Started
Date Finished
Top Drain Used
Base Drain Used
Side Drains Used
Cell Number
Saturation
Cell Pressure Incr.
Back Pressure Incr.
Final Cell Pressure
Final Pore Pressure
Final B Value
Consolidation
Effective Pressure
Cell Pressure
Back Pressure
Consolidated Volume
Volumetric Strain
Consolidated Height
Consolidated Area
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH11
BH11
74425
74425
17.50m
17.50m
6.8.12
6.8.12
BH11
74425
17.50m
6.8.12
20.8.12
25.8.12
Yes
Yes
No
2
2
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
200.00
194.00
16.00
710.00
692.72
0.98
kPa
kPa
kPa
cm3
201.00
901.00
700.00
588.22
0.015786518
148.03
3975.88
mm
mm2
20.8.12
25.8.12
Yes
Yes
No
2
2
20.8.12
25.8.12
Yes
Yes
No
2
2
400.00
1100.00
700.00
572.61
0.008850358
143.24
3998.05
599.00
1299.00
700.00
559.16
0.007827943
137.64
4063.12

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH11
BH11
74425
74425
17.50m
17.50m
6.8.12
6.8.12
BH11
74425
17.50m
6.8.12
Consolidation Stage

0
10
15
20
25
30
35
Volume Change (cc)
10
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
15
20
25

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Shearing
Rate of Strain
Stage 3

BH11
BH11
74425
74425
17.50m
17.50m
6.8.12
6.8.12
BH11
74425
17.50m
6.8.12
900
700.01
0.01
1100
700.06
0.01
1301
699.95
0.01
2.249
1083.90
183.90
266.17
82.27
3.235
174.22
91.95
19.8
32.8
2.943
1365.85
264.85
444.60
179.75
2.473
312.18
132.43
19.8
32.8
3.186
1654.32
354.32
600.99
246.67
2.436
423.83
177.16
19.8
32.8

Axial Strain
(%)
2.312
1082.78
Axial Stress
kPa
183.78
kPa
818.04
Pore Water Pressure
kPa
kPa
264.74
kPa
80.96
3.270
s'
kPa
172.85
t'
kPa
91.89
3.143
1363.31
264.31
922.09
441.22
176.91
2.494
309.06
132.15
4.197
1648.20
349.20
1068.64
579.56
230.36
2.516
404.96
174.60
Max Deviator Stress

Axial Strain
Axial Stress
s'
t'
Cohesion c'
kPa
kPa
mm/min
Stage 2
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
degs
kPa

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH11
BH11
74425
74425
17.50m
17.50m
6.8.12
6.8.12
BH11
74425
17.50m
6.8.12
Shearing Stage
400
350
300
250
Stage 1
Stage 2
200
Stage 3
150
100
50
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Axial Strain (%)
1150
Pore Pressure (kPa)
1050
950
Stage 1
Stage 2
850
Stage 3
750
650
550
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Axial Strain (%)
3.5
4.5

Stage 1
Sample Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH11
BH11
74425
74425
17.50m
17.50m
6.8.12
6.8.12
BH11
74425
17.50m
6.8.12
Shearing Stage
3.5
2.5
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
1.5
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Axial Strain (%)
350
300
Shear Stress (kPa)
250
Stage 1
200
Stage 2
Stage 3
150
100
50
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700

Stage 1
Sample Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH11
BH11
74425
74425
17.50m
17.50m
6.8.12
6.8.12
BH11
74425
17.50m
6.8.12
Shearing Stage
200
180
160
140
120
Stage 1
100
Stage 2
80
Stage 3
60
40
20
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Mode of failure:
Plastic
Approved Signatory:
Date: 3.9.12
Chris Lloyd
extent of the law.

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2

BH12
BH12
74428
74428
3.0m
3.0m
06.08.12
06.08.12
Undisturbed
Undisturbed
Stage 3
BH12
74428
3.0m
06.08.12
Undisturbed
SILTY CLAY: grey

Height
mm
Diameter
mm
mm2
Area
cm3
Volume
Wet Mass
g
Dry Mass
g
t/m3
Wet Density
t/m3
Dry Density
Moisture Content
%
%
99.20
49.90
1955.65
194.00
390.34
314.90
2.01
1.62
24.0
100.36
2.65

Moisture Content
%
t/m3
Wet Density
t/m3
Dry Density
23.7
2.06
1.66

kPa
76
150
300
754.01
915.34
1179.88
Axial Stress
kPa
105.01
191.34
305.88
kPa
607.61
628.94
685.12
Pore Water Pressure
kPa
Axial Strain
%
1.824
2.196
2.245
kPa
146.40
286.40
494.76
kPa
41.39
95.06
188.88
3.54
3.01
2.62
23.6
Cohesion c'
kPa
18.0
s'
kPa
93.90
190.73
341.82
t'
kPa
52.51
95.67
152.94
Failure Criteria
All failure criteria were determined by the maximum principal effective stress ratio
Test Type
Multistage triaxial compression test with pore water pressure measurements
1

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Test Setup
Date Started
Date Finished
Top Drain Used
Base Drain Used
Side Drains Used
Cell Number
Saturation
Cell Pressure Incr.
Back Pressure Incr.
Final Cell Pressure
Final Pore Pressure
Final B Value
Consolidation
Effective Pressure
Cell Pressure
Back Pressure
Consolidated Volume
Volumetric Strain
Consolidated Height
Consolidated Area
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH12
BH12
74428
74428
3.0m
3.0m
06.08.12
06.08.12
BH12
74428
3.0m
06.08.12
16.08.12
19.08.12
Yes
Yes
No
2
2
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
74.00
73.00
11.00
584.00
574.26
0.99
kPa
kPa
kPa
cm3
76.00
651.00
575.00
190.96
0.005221638
98.68
1935.23
mm
mm2
16.08.12
19.08.12
Yes
Yes
No
2
2
16.08.12
19.08.12
Yes
Yes
No
2
2
150.00
726.00
576.00
189.20
0.003082647
96.39
1962.81
301.00
876.00
575.00
186.57
0.004633657
93.71
1991.04

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH12
BH12
74428
74428
3.0m
3.0m
06.08.12
06.08.12
BH12
74428
3.0m
06.08.12
Consolidation Stage

0
10
15
20
25
Volume Change (cc)
0.5
1.5
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
2.5
3.5

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Shearing
Rate of Strain
Stage 3

BH12
BH12
74428
74428
3.0m
3.0m
06.08.12
06.08.12
BH12
74428
3.0m
06.08.12
651
575.11
0.01
725
574.95
0.01
875
574.94
0.01
1.939
757.93
107.93
151.16
43.23
3.497
97.20
53.97
23.6
18.0
2.240
918.75
192.75
290.54
97.79
2.971
194.17
96.38
23.6
18.0
2.390
1181.89
306.89
498.35
191.46
2.603
344.91
153.45
23.6
18.0

Axial Strain
(%)
1.824
754.01
Axial Stress
kPa
105.01
kPa
607.61
Pore Water Pressure
kPa
kPa
146.40
kPa
41.39
3.537
s'
kPa
93.90
t'
kPa
52.51
2.196
915.34
191.34
628.94
286.40
95.06
3.013
190.73
95.67
2.245
1179.88
305.88
685.12
494.76
188.88
2.619
341.82
152.94
Max Deviator Stress

Axial Strain
Axial Stress
s'
t'
Cohesion c'
kPa
kPa
mm/min
Stage 2
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
degs
kPa

Stage 1
Specimen Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH12
BH12
74428
74428
3.0m
3.0m
06.08.12
06.08.12
BH12
74428
3.0m
06.08.12
Shearing Stage
350
300
250
Stage 1
200
Stage 2
Stage 3
150
100
50
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Axial Strain (%)
710
690
Pore Pressure (kPa)
670
650
Stage 1
Stage 2
630
Stage 3
610
590
570
550
0
0.5
1.5
Axial Strain (%)
2.5

Stage 1
Sample Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH12
BH12
74428
74428
3.0m
3.0m
06.08.12
06.08.12
BH12
74428
3.0m
06.08.12
Shearing Stage
3.5
3
2.5
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Axial Strain (%)
300
Shear Stress (kPa)
250
200
Stage 1
Stage 2
150
Stage 3
100
50
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600

Stage 1
Sample Details
Client
Address
Project:
Sample Source
Laboratory Number
Depth
Date Received
Stage 2
Stage 3

BH12
BH12
74428
74428
3.0m
3.0m
06.08.12
06.08.12
BH12
74428
3.0m
06.08.12
Shearing Stage
180
160
140
120
Stage 1
100
Stage 2
80
Stage 3
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Mode of failure:
Plastic
Approved Signatory:
Date: 23.8.12
Chris Lloyd
This document is to be treated as an original within the meaning of UCP 600. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits of client's instructions,
if any. The company's sole responsibility it to its client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the
content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

15/33 Maddox Street
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
OEDOMETER TEST REPORT

Test Method: AS1289.6.6.1
Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
Lab No.:
BH05
74414
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
29.8.12
Depth (m):
5.00m
Description:SILTY CLAY: brown.

0.66
7.0
Void Ratio
% Settlement
6.0
0.64
5.0
0.4
0.62
4.0
% Settlement
Void Ratio
0.8
0.60
3.0
10
0.58
2.0
0.56
1.0
0.54
1
10
0.0
1000
100
Applied Pressure (kPa)
Dry Density (t/m3):
1.60
Initial Moisture (%):
23.2
Assumed Particle Density (t/m3):
2.65
Initial Voids Ratio:
0.655
Sample Type
Approved Signatory:
Undisturbed
Remarks:
Test Condition: Inundated on load
Chris Lloyd
94.1
Page 1 of 2
Sample swelled at 25kPa.
Initial Degree of Saturation (%):
Date:
29.8.12

Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
74414
Lab No.:
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
29.8.12
BH05
Depth (m):
5.00m
TEST RESULTS
Stage
Load
Cc
(kPa)
Cv (m2/yr)
t50
t90
Mv (kPa-1x10-3)
Ca x 10-3
% Consolidation
25-50
0.014
8.68
22.86
0.105
0.00
0.6
50-100
0.040
4.01
14.29
0.146
0.00
1.3
100-200
0.072
5.33
13.25
0.133
0.62
2.6
200-400
0.096
4.57
13.09
0.090
0.80
4.4
400-800
0.124
2.74
5.45
0.059
0.00
6.7
800-200
5.3
200-50
3.7
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2
Stage 1
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74414
Compression v's Time (Log Scale)
Compression v's Time (Sq. Root Scale)
9.74
9.740
9.73
9.730
9.72
t0
9.720
t0
t0
9.710
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.71
t0
9.7
9.69
t50
t50
9.68
9.700
9.690
9.680
9.67
9.670
9.66
9.660
t100
9.65
0.01
t90
t90
t100
t100
t100
9.650
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
Sq. Root Time (mins)
25
30
35
Stage 2
100 kPa
Lab No.: 74414
9.65
9.650
9.63
9.630
9.61
9.610
t0
t0
t0
t0
9.590
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.59
9.57
9.55
t50
9.570
9.550
t50
9.53
9.530
9.51
9.510
9.49
9.490
t100
9.47
0.01
t90
t90
t100
t100
t100
9.470
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 3
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74414
9.48
9.480
9.43
9.430
t0
t0
t0
t0
9.380
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.38
9.33
t50
t50
9.28
9.330
9.280
9.23
t90
t90
t100
t100
9.230
t100
9.18
0.01
t100
9.180
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 4
400 kPa
Lab No.: 74414
9.16
9.160
9.11
9.110
t0
t0
t0
9.060
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.06
9.01
8.96
t0
t50
t50
9.010
8.960
8.91
t90
t90
t100
t100
8.910
8.86
8.860
t100
8.81
0.01
t100
8.810
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 5
800 kPa
Lab No.: 74414
8.74
8.740
t0
8.69
8.690
8.64
8.640
8.59
8.590
8.54
t50
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
t50
8.49
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
8.540
8.490
8.44
8.440
8.39
8.390
t100
8.34
0.01
t0
t100
8.340
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Stage 6
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74414
8.6
8.600
8.55
8.550
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
8.5
8.45
8.500
8.450
t0
t0
8.4
8.35
0.01
8.400
8.350
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 7
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74414
8.95
8.950
8.9
8.900
8.85
8.850
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
8.8
8.800
8.75
8.750
8.7
8.700
8.65
0.01
8.650
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45

15/33 Maddox Street
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481

Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
Lab No.:
BH11
74424
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
29.8.12
Depth (m):
14.50m

0.98
14.0
Void Ratio
0.96
% Settlement
0.94
12.0
0.92
0.90
10.0
0.6
0.88
8.0
0.84
0
0.82
6.0
15
% Settlement
Void Ratio
1
0.86
0.80
0.78
4.0
0.76
0.74
2.0
0.72
0.70
1
10
0.0
1000
100
Dry Density (t/m3):
1.35
36.0
2.65
0.963
Sample Type
Approved Signatory:
Undisturbed
Remarks:
Chris Lloyd
99.3
Page 1 of 2
Sample swelled at 12.5kPa.
Date:
29.8.12

Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
74424
Lab No.:
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
29.8.12
Depth (m):
14.50m
BH11
TEST RESULTS
Stage
Load
Cc
(kPa)
Cv (m2/yr)
t50
t90
Mv (kPa-1x10-3)
Ca x 10-3
% Consolidation
12.5-25
0.006
17.50
23.45
0.079
0.00
0.1
25-50
0.043
2.90
17.63
0.265
0.60
0.8
50-100
0.100
2.71
9.19
0.310
1.02
2.3
100-200
0.166
3.56
16.12
0.261
1.47
4.9
200-400
0.202
1.09
4.20
0.163
2.36
8.0
400-800
0.328
0.65
0.92
0.136
4.35
13.0
800-200
11.3
200-50
8.8
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2
Stage 1
25 kPa
Lab No.: 74424

9.760
9.75
9.750
9.74
9.740
9.73
9.730
t0
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)

9.76
t0
9.72
9.71
t0
9.710
t50
t50
9.7
9.69
t0
9.720
t90
t100
9.700
t100
9.68
0.01
t100
t90
t100
9.690
9.680
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 2
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74424
9.69
9.690
9.67
9.670
9.65
t0
9.650
t0
t0
9.61
9.59
t50
t50
9.610
9.570
9.55
9.550
t100
9.51
0.01
t90
t100
9.590
9.57
9.53
t0
9.630
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.63
t90
t100
t100
9.530
9.510
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 3
100 kPa
Lab No.: 74424
9.43
9.430
t0
t0
t0
9.380
9.33
t50
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.38
t0
t50
9.28
9.23
9.330
t90
t90
t100
t100
9.280
9.230
t100
9.18
0.01
t100
9.180
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 4
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74424
9.01
9.010
t0
t0
8.96
8.960
8.91
8.910
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
8.86
t50
t50
8.81
8.76
t0
8.860
t90
t90
t100
t100
8.810
8.760
8.71
8.710
t100
8.66
0.01
t100
8.660
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 5
400 kPa
Lab No.: 74424
8.54
t0
8.540
t0
t0
8.440
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
8.44
t0
8.34
t50
t50
8.340
8.24
8.240
8.14
8.140
t100
8.04
0.01
t90
t90
t100
t100
t100
8.040
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Stage 6
800 kPa
Lab No.: 74424
7.96
7.960
t0
7.860
7.76
7.760
7.66
7.660
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
7.86
7.56
t50
t50
7.46
7.36
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
7.560
7.460
7.360
7.26
7.16
t0
7.260
t100
7.06
0.01
7.160
t100
7.060
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 7
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74424
7.39
7.390
7.34
7.340
7.29
7.290
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
7.24
7.240
7.19
7.190
7.14
7.140
t0
7.09
0.01
t0
7.090
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Stage 8
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74424

7.910
7.81
7.810
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)

7.91
7.71
7.61
7.710
7.610
7.51
7.510
t0
7.41
0.01
t0
7.410
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35

15/33 Maddox Street
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481

Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
Lab No.:
BH11
74425
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
30.8.12
Depth (m):
17.50m

14.0
1.02
Void Ratio
1.00
% Settlement
12.0
0.98
0.96
0.94
10.0
0.92
0.6
8.0
0.88
6.0
0.86
#NUM!
0.84
% Settlement
Void Ratio
0.90
15
0.82
4.0
0.80
0.78
2.0
0.76
0.74
0.0
0.72
0.70
1
10
-2.0
1000
100
Dry Density (t/m3):
1.33
39.7
2.65
0.999
Sample Type
Approved Signatory:
Undisturbed
Remarks:
Chris Lloyd
105.5
Page 1 of 2
Date:
30.8.12

Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
74425
Lab No.:
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
30.8.12
Depth (m):
17.50m
BH11
TEST RESULTS
Stage
Load
Cc
(kPa)
Cv (m2/yr)
t50
t90
Mv (kPa-1x10-3)
Ca x 10-3
% Consolidation
12.5-25
0.014
2.11
13.87
0.172
0.00
0.2
25-50
0.037
1.36
4.84
0.225
0.00
0.8
50-100
0.083
1.64
2.37
0.251
1.65
2.0
100-200
0.153
1.20
2.18
0.234
2.24
4.3
200-400
0.246
0.79
1.44
0.193
3.14
8.0
400-800
0.335
0.69
1.00
0.137
3.67
13.0
800-200
11.8
200-50
9.7
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2
Stage 1
25 kPa
Lab No.: 74425
9.84
9.840
9.83
9.830
9.82
9.820
9.81
t0
t0
9.810
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
9.8
9.79
t50
9.800
9.790
t90
t100
t50
9.78
9.780
9.77
9.770
9.76
t100
9.75
0.01
t0
t90
t100
9.760
t100
9.750
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 2
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74425
9.76
9.74
9.760
t0
t0
9.72
t0
9.720
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
9.740
9.7
t50
t50
9.68
9.700
9.680
9.66
9.660
9.64
9.640
t100
9.62
0.01
t90
t90
t100
t100
t100
9.620
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 3
100 kPa
Lab No.: 74425
9.62
9.620
t0
t0
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
9.570
9.52
t50
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.57
t0
t50
9.47
9.42
t100
9.37
0.01
9.520
9.470
9.420
t100
9.370
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 4
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74425

t0
t0
9.340
9.29
9.290
9.24
9.240
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
9.34
9.19
t50
t50
9.14
9.09
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
9.190
9.140
9.090
9.04
8.99
t0
9.040
t100
8.94
0.01
t100
8.990
8.940
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 5
400 kPa
Lab No.: 74425
8.87
8.870
8.77
8.770
8.67
t50
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t50
8.57
8.47
t0
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
8.670
8.570
8.470
8.37
8.370
t100
8.27
0.01
t100
8.270
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Stage 6
800 kPa
Lab No.: 74425
8.28
8.280
t0
8.18
8.180
8.08
8.080
7.98
7.980
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
7.88
t50
t50
7.78
7.68
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
7.880
7.780
7.680
7.58
7.48
t0
7.580
t100
7.38
0.01
7.480
t100
7.380
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 7
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74425
7.61
7.610
7.56
7.560
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
7.51
7.46
t0
7.41
0.01
7.510
7.460
t0
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
7.410
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Stage 8
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74425
7.98
7.980
7.93
7.930
7.88
7.880
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
7.83
7.78
7.830
7.780
7.73
7.730
7.68
7.680
t0
7.63
0.01
t0
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
7.630
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35

15/33 Maddox Street
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481

Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
Lab No.:
BH12
74428
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
30.8.12
Depth (m):
3.00m
Description:SILTY CLAY: grey.

8.0
0.72
Void Ratio
% Settlement
7.0
0.70
6.0
0.68
0.4
5.0
4.0
% Settlement
Void Ratio
0.8
0.66
#NUM!
3.0
0.64
10
2.0
0.62
1.0
0.60
0.0
0.58
1
10
-1.0
1000
100
Dry Density (t/m3):
1.55
26.2
2.65
0.711
Sample Type
Approved Signatory:
Undisturbed
Remarks:
Chris Lloyd
98.0
Page 1 of 2
Date:
30.8.12

Client:
Project:
Client Id.:
74428
Lab No.:
Test Date:
15.8.12
Report Date:
30.8.12
BH12
Depth (m):
3.00m
Description:SILTY CLAY: grey.
TEST RESULTS
Stage
Load
Cc
(kPa)
Cv (m2/yr)
t50
t90
Mv (kPa-1x10-3)
Ca x 10-3
% Consolidation
25-50
0.015
2.63
9.50
0.109
0.00
0.3
50-100
0.041
6.15
23.26
0.143
0.00
1.0
100-200
0.079
4.64
16.66
0.141
0.00
2.4
200-400
0.112
3.02
8.18
0.101
0.00
4.3
400-800
0.140
2.67
6.03
0.064
0.00
6.8
800-200
6.5
200-50
5.1
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2
Stage 1
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74428
9.14
9.13
9.140
t0
9.130
t0
9.12
9.120
9.11
9.110
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
9.1
t50
t50
9.100
9.09
9.090
9.08
9.080
9.07
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
9.070
t100
9.06
0.01
t100
9.060
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 2
100 kPa
Lab No.: 74428
9.06
9.060
9.04
9.040
9.02
9.020
t0
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
t0
9
8.98
8.96
t50
t50
t0
8.980
8.960
8.94
8.940
8.92
8.920
t100
8.9
0.01
t0
9.000
t90
t100
t90
t100
t100
8.900
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 3
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74428
8.81
8.810
t0
t0
t0
8.71
8.760
t50
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
8.76
t0
t50
8.66
8.710
t90
t90
t100
t100
8.660
t100
8.61
0.01
t100
8.610
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 4
400 kPa
Lab No.: 74428
8.61
8.610
8.56
8.560
8.51
t0
8.510
t0
t0
8.460
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
8.46
8.41
8.36
t0
t50
t50
8.410
8.360
8.31
8.310
8.26
8.260
t100
8.21
0.01
t90
t90
t100
t100
t100
8.210
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 5
800 kPa
Lab No.: 74428

t0
t0
8.120
8.07
8.070
8.02
8.020
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
8.12
7.97
7.92
t50
t50
7.87
t0
t90
t90
t100
t100
7.970
7.920
7.870
7.82
7.820
7.77
7.770
t100
7.72
0.01
t0
t100
7.720
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Stage 6
200 kPa
Lab No.: 74428

7.950
7.93
7.930
7.91
7.910
7.89
7.890
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)

7.95
7.87
7.85
7.870
7.850
7.83
7.830
7.81
7.810
7.79
7.790
t0
7.77
0.01
t0
7.770
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 7
50 kPa
Lab No.: 74428
8.23
8.230
8.18
8.180
Deformation (mm)
Deformation (mm)
8.13
8.130
8.08
8.080
8.03
8.030
7.98
0.01
7.980
0.1
10
Time (mins)
100
1000
10000
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

CLIENT:
PROJECT:

Wyong Road Interchange
NB11462
Sample ID:
JOB NO.:
LAB NO.:
Date Tested:
Test Type:
Sample Type:
BH07
Sample Length:
Length/Diameter Ratio:
121.6
2.3
3
2.31
Dry Density (t/m ):
Moisture Content Before Test (%):
Sample Diameter:
52.0
5.4
Specimen tested at the moisture condition as received.

Specimen supplied by client.
Bulk density value was determined by vernier calliper method.
Testing Equipment: CL 10305 2000kn Hydraulic Compression Machine
Mode of Failure:
Brittle
Test Methods: RMS T229
Single Individual Rock

Core Specimen
Rock Type:
Sandstone
Depth (m):
18.62 - 18.87m
Moisture Content After Test (%):
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH:

U.C.S. (MPa) =
20.2
Notes on Testing:
1230170
74432
16.08.12
Compressive Strength
5.4
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:

NB11462
Sample ID:
JOB NO.:
LAB NO.:
Date Tested:
Test Type:
Sample Type:
BH08
Sample Length:
109.4
2.1
3
2.30
Dry Density (t/m ):
Sample Diameter:
51.7
5.6

Mode of Failure:
Single Shear

Core Specimen
Sandstone
Rock Type:
Depth (m):
21.61 - 21.81m

U.C.S. (MPa) =
35.6
Notes on Testing:
1227731
73349
03.07.12
5.4
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:

NB11462
Sample ID:
JOB NO.:
LAB NO.:
Date Tested:
Test Type:
Sample Type:
BH09
Sample Length:
115.2
2.2
3
2.15
Dry Density (t/m ):
Sample Diameter:
51.6
6.5
1227731
73357
03.07.12
Core Specimen
Claystone
Rock Type:
Depth (m):
24.72 - 24.92m
6.3

U.C.S. (MPa) =
6.6
Notes on Testing:

Mode of Failure:
Brittle
The time of the test falls outside the Standard Limits of 5-15 mins due to sample strength being lower
than estimated strength.
TEST CERTIFICATE
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 8594 0481
fax: +61 (0)2 8594 0499

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

CLIENT:
PROJECT:

NB11462
Sample ID:
JOB NO.:
LAB NO.:
Date Tested:
Test Type:
Sample Type:
BH10
Sample Length:
122.3
2.4
3
2.23
Dry Density (t/m ):
Sample Diameter:
51.8
6.9

Mode of Failure:
Brittle

Core Specimen
Rock Type:
Sandstone
Depth (m):
25.08 - 25.32

U.C.S. (MPa) =
22.5
Notes on Testing:
1230170
74438
16.08.12
6.9
TEST CERTIFICATE

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 9597 5599
fax: +61 (0)2 9597 3442
POINT LOAD STRENGTH INDEX

CLIENT:

PROJECT: Wyong Road Interchange (NB11462)

LAB.
NO.
SAMPLE
SOURCE
LITHOLOGY
PLATEN
SEPARATION
DIAM
(mm)
74429 BH07 10.80 10.97
Claystone
74430 BH07 15.00 15.14
Claystone
74431 BH07 17.80 17.92
Sandstone
74432 BH07 18.62 18.87
Sandstone
74433 BH07 21.06 21.26
Claystone
TEST
ORIENTATION
HEIGHT
(mm)
POINT
POINT
LOAD
LOAD
STRENGTH STRENGTH
Is(50) (MPa)
Is (MPa)
Type
OF
FAILURE
46.0
Diametral
Axial
0.17
0.11
0.17
0.12
FOB
FOB
41.7
Diametral
Axial
0.12
0.10
0.12
0.10
FOB
FOB
35.8
Diametral
Axial
0.46
0.35
0.47
0.34
FOB
FOB
39.6
Diametral
Axial
0.63
0.83
0.64
0.84
FOB
FOB
40.3
Diametral
Axial
0.89
0.76
0.91
0.78
FOB
FOB
51.2
52.6
51.9
52.0
52.0
NOTES TO TESTING
Testing Device
ELE Point Load Tester
Sample History
Unsoaked
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
15/08/2012
Test Method:
RMS T223
Failure Type
Fracture through fabric of specimen oblique to bedding
FOB
not influenced by weak planes
Fracture along bedding
FB
Fracture influenced by pre-existing plane, microfracture,
FIP
vein, chemical alteration
Chip or partial fracture
CPF
Page 1 of 2
TEST CERTIFICATE

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 9597 5599
fax: +61 (0)2 9597 3442

CLIENT:

PROJECT: Wyong Road Interchange NB11462

LAB.
NO.
SAMPLE
SOURCE
LITHOLOGY
PLATEN
SEPARATION
DIAM
(mm)
73348 BH08 20.73 20.87m
Sandstone
73349 BH08 21.61 21.81m
Sandstone
73350 BH08 22.78 22.93m
Sandstone
73351 BH08 23.82 24.00m
Sandstone
73352 BH08 24.85 25.00m
Claystone
TEST
ORIENTATION
HEIGHT
(mm)
POINT
POINT
LOAD
LOAD
STRENGTH STRENGTH
Is(50) (MPa)
Is (MPa)
Type
OF
FAILURE
38.8
Diametral
Axial
0.93
1.02
0.95
1.02
FOB
FOB
36.1
Diametral
Axial
1.74
2.49
1.76
2.46
FOB
FOB
38.5
Diametral
Axial
1.50
2.20
1.52
2.21
FOB
FOB
37.0
Diametral
Axial
1.52
2.79
1.54
2.78
FOB
FOB
34.5
Diametral
Axial
0.50
0.41
0.51
0.41
FOB
FOB
51.8
51.7
51.8
51.8
51.6
NOTES TO TESTING
Testing Device
Sample History
Unsoaked
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1227731
Date Tested:
03.07.12
Test Method:
RTA T223
Failure Type
FOB
FB
FIP
CPF
Page 1 of 2
TEST CERTIFICATE

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 9597 5599
fax: +61 (0)2 9597 3442

CLIENT:

PROJECT: Wyong Road Interchange NB11462

LAB.
NO.
SAMPLE
SOURCE
LITHOLOGY
PLATEN
SEPARATION
DIAM HEIGHT
(mm)
(mm)
73353 BH09 19.00 19.17m
Sandstone
51.7
73354 BH09 21.43 21.60m
Sandstone
73355 BH09 22.73 22.90m
Sandstone
73356 BH09 23.79 24.00m
Claystone
73357 BH09 24.72 24.92m
Claystone
TEST
ORIENTATION
POINT
POINT
LOAD
LOAD
STRENGTH STRENGTH
Is(50) (MPa)
Is (MPa)
Type
OF
FAILURE
41.5
Diametral
Axial
0.22
0.15
0.22
0.15
FOB
FOB
38.0
Diametral
Axial
2.25
2.43
2.08
2.31
FOB
FOB
37.6
Diametral
Axial
0.95
0.94
0.97
0.94
FOB
FOB
35.5
Diametral
Axial
0.42
0.44
0.43
0.43
FOB
FOB
32.0
Diametral
Axial
0.36
0.56
0.37
0.54
FOB
FOB
41.7
51.6
51.0
51.5
NOTES TO TESTING
Testing Device
Sample History
Unsoaked
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1227731
Date Tested:
03.07.12
Test Method:
RTA T223
Failure Type
FOB
FB
FIP
CPF
Page 2 of 2
TEST CERTIFICATE

(PO Box 6432)
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia
ABN 44 000 964 278

ph: +61 (0)2 9597 5599
fax: +61 (0)2 9597 3442

CLIENT:

PROJECT: Wyong Road Interchange (NB11462)

LAB.
NO.
SAMPLE
SOURCE
LITHOLOGY
74434 BH10 19.47 19.65
Claystone
74435 BH10 21.75 21.95
Claystone
74436 BH10 23.68 23.81
Sandstone
74437 BH10 24.06 24.22
Sandstone
74438 BH10 25.08 25.32
Sandstone
PLATEN
SEPARATION
DIAM HEIGHT
(mm)
(mm)
TEST
ORIENTATION
POINT
POINT
LOAD
LOAD
STRENGTH STRENGTH
Is(50) (MPa)
Is (MPa)
Type
OF
FAILURE
44.6
Diametral
Axial
0.15
0.10
0.15
0.11
FOB
FOB
44.8
Diametral
Axial
0.13
0.07
0.13
0.07
FOB
FOB
37.3
Diametral
Axial
0.83
0.81
0.85
0.81
FOB
FOB
30.2
Diametral
Axial
0.17
0.75
0.17
0.72
FOB
FOB
39.3
Diametral
Axial
0.48
0.57
0.49
0.58
FOB
FOB
52.1
51.8
51.8
51.7
51.8
NOTES TO TESTING
Testing Device
Sample History
Unsoaked
Sampled By:
Client
Job Number:
1230170
Date Tested:
15/08/2012
Test Method:
RMS T223
Failure Type
FOB
FB
FIP
CPF
Page 2 of 2
D2:
Chemical

61
ANALYTICAL REPORT
LABORATORY DETAILS
CLIENT DETAILS
Contact
David Andrew
Manager
Huong Crawford
Client
Laboratory
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Address
100 Christie St
(PO Box 164, ST LEONARDS NSW 1590)
NSW 2065
Address
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St

Alexandria NSW 2015
Telephone
02 9928 2100
Telephone
+61 2 8594 0400
Facsimile
02 9928 2500
Facsimile
+61 2 8594 0499
Email
au.industrial.CMTEast@sgs.com
Email
au.environmental.sydney@sgs.com
Project
SKM Job No NB11462 - SGS Job No 1230170
SGS Reference
SE111157 R0
Order Number
(Not specified)
Report Number
0000038254
Samples
Date Reported
23 Aug 2012
Date Received
16 Aug 2012
COMMENTS
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. NATA accredited laboratory 2562(4354).
SIGNATORIES
Dong Liang
Inorganics Metals Team Leader

ABN 44 000 964 278
Environmental Services
Ly Kim Ha
Organics Supervisor
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015
Snezana Kostoska
Inorganics Chemist
Australia
Australia
t +61 2 8594 0400
f +61 2 8594 0499
www.au.sgs.com
Member of the SGS Group
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample Number
Sample Matrix
Sample Date
Sample Name
Parameter
pH in soil (1:5)
Units
LOR
pH Units
SE111157.001
Soil
16 Aug 2012
74413 BH01
6.0m
SE111157.002
Soil
16 Aug 2012
74415 BH02
7.0m
SE111157 R0
SE111157.003
Soil
16 Aug 2012
74418 BH05
4.0m
SE111157.004
Soil
16 Aug 2012
74419 BH07
5.5m
SE111157.005
Soil
16 Aug 2012
74422 BH10
10.0m
Method: AN101
pH
Soluble Anions (1:5) in Soil by Ion Chromatography
6.3
6.2
6.5
5.9
4.3
Method: AN245
Chloride
mg/kg
0.25
25
130
110
170
20
Sulphate
mg/kg
0.5
16
36
33
110
1200
Conductivity and TDS by Calculation - Soil
Method: AN106
Conductivity of Extract (1:5 dry sample basis)
S/cm
51
130
84
180
430
Resistivity of extract (1:5 Dry sample basis)*
ohm m
0.1
190
76
120
55
24
0.5
18
20
14
18
25
Moisture Content
% Moisture
Page 2 of 5
Method: AN002
23-August-2012
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample Number
Sample Matrix
Sample Date
Sample Name
Parameter
pH in soil (1:5)
Units
LOR
pH Units
SE111157.006
Soil
16 Aug 2012
74426 BH12
2.0m
Method: AN101
pH
4.9
Method: AN245
Chloride
mg/kg
0.25
21
Sulphate
mg/kg
0.5
89
Method: AN106
S/cm
55
ohm m
0.1
180
0.5
15
Moisture Content
% Moisture
Page 3 of 5
SE111157 R0
Method: AN002
23-August-2012
SE111157 R0
QC SUMMARY
MB blank results are compared to the Limit of Reporting

LCS and MS spike recoveries are measured as the percentage of analyte recovered from the sample compared the the amount of analyte spiked into the sample.
DUP and MSD relative percent differences are measured against their original counterpart samples according to the formula: the absolute difference of the two results divided
by the average of the two results as a percentage. Where the DUP RPD is 'NA' , the results are less than the LOR and thus the RPD is not applicable.
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN106
Parameter
QC
Reference
Units
LOR
MB
DUP %RPD
LCS
%Recovery
12%
103%
LB025120
S/cm
<1
LB025120
ohm m
0.1
17000
pH in soil (1:5)
Parameter
pH
QC
Reference
LB025115

Parameter
Units
LOR
pH Units
DUP %RPD
LCS
%Recovery
1%
101%
MB
LCS
%Recovery
QC
Reference
Units
LOR
Chloride
LB025143
mg/kg
0.25
<0.25
108%
Sulphate
LB025143
mg/kg
0.5
<0.5
106%
Page 4 of 5
23-August-2012
METHOD SUMMARY
METHOD
SE111157 R0
METHODOLOGY SUMMARY
AN002
The test is carried out by drying (at either 40C or 105C) a known mass of sample in a weighed evaporating basin.
After fully dry the sample is re-weighed. Samples such as sludge and sediment having high percentages of
moisture will take some time in a drying oven for complete removal of water.
AN101
pH in Soil Sludge Sediment and Water: pH is measured electrometrically using a combination electrode (glass
plus reference electrode) and is calibrated against 3 buffers purchased commercially. For soils, an extract with
water (or 0.01M CaCl2) is made at a ratio of 1:5 and the pH determined and reported on the extract. Reference
APHA 4500-H+.
AN106
Conductivity and TDS by Calculation: Conductivity is measured by meter with temperature compensation and is
calibrated against a standard solution of potassium chloride. Conductivity is generally reported as mhos/cm or
S/cm @ 25C. For soils, an extract with water is made at a ratio of 1:5 and the EC determined and reported on
the extract, or calculated back to the as-received sample. Salinity can be estimated from conductivity using a
conversion factor, which for natural waters, is in the range 0.55 to 0.75. Reference APHA 2520 B.
AN245
Anions by Ion Chromatography: A water sample is injected into an eluent stream that passes through the ion
chromatographic system where the anions of interest ie Br, Cl, NO2, NO3 and SO4 are separated on their relative
affinities for the active sites on the column packing material. Changes to the conductivity and the UV-visible
absorbance of the eluent enable identification and quantitation of the anions based on their retention time and
peak height or area. APHA 4110 B
FOOTNOTES
IS
LNR
*
^
LOR
Insufficient sample for analysis.

Sample listed, but not received.
This analysis is not covered by the scope of
accreditation.
Performed by outside laboratory.
Limit of Reporting
Raised or Lowered Limit of Reporting
QFH
QFL
NVL
QC result is above the upper tolerance

QC result is below the lower tolerance
The sample was not analysed for this analyte
Not Validated
Samples analysed as received.

Solid samples expressed on a dry weight basis.
Some totals may not appear to add up because the total is rounded after adding up the raw values.
The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:
http://www.au.sgs.com/sgs-mp-au-env-qu-022-qa-qc-plan-en-11.pdf
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service available on request and accessible at
http://www.au.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions_au . The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues
defined therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only
and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to
a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This report must not be reproduced, except in full.
Page 5 of 5
23-August-2012
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 74973

Client:
Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd
100 Christie St
St Leonards
NSW 2065
Attention:
David Andrew
Sample log in details:

Your Reference:
No. of samples:
Date samples received:
Date completed instructions received:
NB11462, Wyong Road Interchange

9 Soils
19/06/2012
19/06/2012
Analysis Details:
Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.
Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.
Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.
Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.
Report Details:
Date results requested by:
21/06/12
Date of Preliminary Report:
Not Issued
Issue Date:
21/06/12
NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.
Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.
Results Approved By:
Envirolab Reference:
Revision No:
74973
R 00
Page 1 of 4
Client Reference:
sPOCAS field test

Our Reference:
UNITS
74973-1
74973-2
74973-3
74973-4
74973-5
Your Reference
-------------
BH08
BH08
BH09
BH09
BH09
Depth
------------
2m
5m
3m
10.5m
4.1m
9/06/2012
Soil
9/06/2012
Soil
9/06/2012
Soil
9/06/2012
Soil
9/06/2012
Soil
5.3
5.7
5.0
5.2
4.9
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pHF (field pH test)*
pH Units
pHFOX (field peroxide test)*
pH Units
3.4
3.7
4.2
4.1
3.4
Reaction Rate*
Moderate
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
sPOCAS field test

Our Reference:
UNITS
74973-7
74973-8
74973-9
Your Reference
-------------
BH08
BH08
BH09
Depth
------------
1.8m
3.3m
5.3m
9/06/2012
Soil
9/06/2012
Soil
9/06/2012
Soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pH Units
5.6
5.5
4.6
pH Units
3.0
3.5
3.8
Reaction Rate*
Slight
Slight
Slight
Revision No:
74973
R 00
Page 2 of 4
Client Reference:
Method ID
Inorg-063
Methodology Summary
pH- measured using pH meter and electrode. Soil is oxidised with Hydrogen Peroxide or extracted with water.
Based on section H, Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines, Version 2.1 - June 2004. To ensure
accurate results these tests are recommended to be done in the field as pH may change with time thus these
results may not be representative of true field conditions.
Revision No:
74973
R 00
Page 3 of 4
Client Reference:
Report Comments:
Asbestos was analysed by Approved Identifier:

Asbestos was authorised by Approved Signatory:
INS: Insufficient sample for this test
NA: Test not required
<: Less than
Not applicable for this job

PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit

RPD: Relative Percent Difference
>: Greater than
NT: Not tested

LCS: Laboratory Control Sample
Quality Control Definitions

Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,
glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples.
Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample
selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.
Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix
spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist.
LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank
sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.
Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds
which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.
Laboratory Acceptance Criteria
Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency
to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batched of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix
spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.
Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.
Matrix Spikes and LCS: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics and 10-140% for SVOC and
speciated phenols is acceptable.
Revision No:
74973
R 00
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 76925

Client:
100 Christie St
St Leonards
NSW 2065
Attention:
David Andrew

Your Reference:
No. of samples:
Date samples received:
Date completed instructions received:

14 soils
03/08/12
03/08/12
Analysis Details:
Report Details:
Date results requested by:
10/08/12
Not Issued
Issue Date:
6/08/12
Revision No:
76925
R 00
Page 1 of 4
Client Reference:
sPOCAS field test

Our Reference:
UNITS
76925-1
76925-2
76925-3
76925-4
76925-5
Your Reference
-------------
BH02
BH07
BH02
BH11
BH12
Depth
------------
5.5
4.0
4.0
23.5
4.7
23/07/2012
Soil
25/07/2012
Soil
23/07/2012
Soil
30/07/2012
Soil
27/07/2012
Soil
5.8
5.3
4.3
6.1
5.1
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pH Units
pH Units
4.3
4.0
4.1
2.1
3.6
Reaction Rate*
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
sPOCAS field test

Our Reference:
UNITS
76925-6
76925-7
76925-8
76925-9
76925-10
Your Reference
-------------
BH11
BH11
BH10
BH10
BH01
Depth
------------
11.5
2.0
85
5.5
3.0
30/07/2012
Soil
27/07/2012
Soil
31/07/2012
Soil
31/07/2012
Soil
26/07/2012
Soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pH Units
6.2
4.9
5.4
5.3
5.1
pH Units
1.5
3.3
1.5
1.5
3.7
Reaction Rate*
Moderate
Vigorous
Vigorous
Vigorous
Slight
Our Reference:
UNITS
76925-11
76925-12
76925-13
76925-14
Your Reference
-------------
BH02
BH12
BH01
BH02
Depth
------------
5.0
1.7
1.0
3.0
23/07/2012
Soil
27/07/2012
Soil
26/07/2012
Soil
23/07/2012
Soil
sPOCAS field test
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pH Units
5.1
4.6
5.0
5.7
pH Units
2.8
2.7
3.8
3.5
Reaction Rate*
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
Revision No:
76925
R 00
Page 2 of 4
Client Reference:
Method ID
Inorg-063
Methodology Summary
pH- measured using pH meter and electrode. Soil is oxidised with Hydrogen Peroxide or extracted with water.
Based on section H, Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines, Version 2.1 - June 2004. To ensure
accurate results these tests are recommended to be done in the field as pH may change with time thus these
results may not be representative of true field conditions.
Revision No:
76925
R 00
Page 3 of 4
Client Reference:
Report Comments:
Asbestos was analysed by Approved Identifier:

Asbestos was authorised by Approved Signatory:
<: Less than


>: Greater than
NT: Not tested


Revision No:
76925
R 00
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
74973-A
Client:
100 Christie St
St Leonards
NSW 2065
Attention:
David Andrew

Your Reference:
No. of samples:
Date samples received / completed instructions received

Additional Testing on 2 Soils
19/06/2012
/ 28/06/12
Analysis Details:
Report Details:
Date results requested by: / Issue Date:
5/07/12
/
5/07/12
Not Issued
Revision No:
74973-A
R 00
Page 1 of 5
Client Reference:
Chromium Suite
Our Reference:
UNITS
74973-A-5
74973-A-7
Your Reference
-------------
BH09
BH08
Depth
------------
4.1m
1.8m
9/06/2012
Soil
9/06/2012
Soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pH kcl
pH units
4.1
4.5
s-TAA pH 6.5
%w/w S
0.04
0.02
12
TAA pH 6.5
moles H /t
28
Chromium Reducible Sulfur
%w/w
<0.005
0.02
11
a-Chromium Reducible Sulfur
moles H /t
<3
SHCl
%w/w S
0.006
[NT]
SKCl
%w/w S
0.007
<0.005
SNAS
%w/w S
<0.005
[NT]
ANCBT
% CaCO3
<0.05
<0.05
s-ANCBT
%w/w S
<0.05
<0.05
s-Net Acidity
%w/w S
0.04
0.04
a-Net Acidity
moles H /t
28
23
Liming rate
kg
CaCO 3/t
2.1
1.8
a-Net Acidity without ANCE
moles H+/t
28
23
Liming rate without ANCE
kg
CaCO 3/t
2.1
1.8
Revision No:
74973-A
R 00
Page 2 of 5
Client Reference:
Method ID
Inorg-068
Methodology Summary
Chromium Reducible Sulfur - Hydrogen Sulfide is quantified by iodometric titration after distillation to determine
potential acidity. Based on Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines, Version 2.1 - June 2004.
Revision No:
74973-A
R 00
Page 3 of 5
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
Chromium Suite
Duplicate results
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
pH kcl
pH units
Inorg-068
[NT]
74973-A-5
4.1 || 4.0 || RPD: 2
LCS
104%
s-TAA pH 6.5
%w/w
S
0.01
Inorg-068
<0.01
74973-A-5
0.04 || 0.05 || RPD: 22
[NR]
[NR]
TAA pH 6.5
moles
H+/t
Inorg-068
<5
74973-A-5
28 || 30 || RPD: 7
[NR]
[NR]
Chromium Reducible
Sulfur
%w/w
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
74973-A-5
<0.005 || <0.005
LCS
76%
a-Chromium Reducible
Sulfur
moles
H+/t
Inorg-068
<3
74973-A-5
<3 || <3
LCS
103%
SHCl
%w/w
S
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
74973-A-5
0.006 || 0.006 || RPD: 0
[NR]
[NR]
SKCl
%w/w
S
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
74973-A-5
0.007 || 0.007 || RPD: 0
LCS
86%
SNAS
%w/w
S
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
74973-A-5
<0.005 || <0.005
[NR]
[NR]
ANCBT
%
CaCO 3
0.05
Inorg-068
<0.05
74973-A-5
<0.05 || <0.05
[NR]
[NR]
s-ANCBT
%w/w
S
0.05
Inorg-068
<0.05
74973-A-5
<0.05 || <0.05
[NR]
[NR]
s-Net Acidity
%w/w
S
0.01
Inorg-068
<0.01
74973-A-5
0.04 || 0.05 || RPD: 22
[NR]
[NR]
a-Net Acidity
moles
H+/t
10
Inorg-068
<10
74973-A-5
28 || 31 || RPD: 10
[NR]
[NR]
Liming rate
kg
CaCO 3
0.75
Inorg-068
<0.75
74973-A-5
2.1 || 2.3 || RPD: 9
[NR]
[NR]
/t
a-Net Acidity without

ANCE
moles
H+/t
10
Inorg-068
<10
74973-A-5
28 || 31 || RPD: 10
[NR]
[NR]
kg
CaCO 3
0.75
Inorg-068
<0.75
74973-A-5
2.1 || 2.3 || RPD: 9
[NR]
[NR]
/t
Revision No:
74973-A
R 00
Page 4 of 5
Client Reference:
Report Comments:
Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier:

Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory:

<: Less than


>: Greater than
NT: Not tested


Revision No:
74973-A
R 00
Page 5 of 5
76925-A
Client:
100 Christie St
St Leonards
NSW 2065
Attention:
David Andrew

Your Reference:
No. of samples:

Additional Testing on 9 Soils
03/08/12
/ 08/08/12
Analysis Details:
Report Details:
16/08/12
/
15/08/12
Not Issued
Revision No:
76925-A
R 00
Page 1 of 5
Client Reference:
Chromium Suite
Our Reference:
UNITS
76925-A-2
76925-A-6
76925-A-7
76925-A-8
76925-A-9
Your Reference
-------------
BH07
BH11
BH11
BH10
BH10
Depth
------------
4.0
11.5
2.0
85
5.5
25/07/2012
Soil
30/07/2012
Soil
27/07/2012
Soil
31/07/2012
Soil
31/07/2012
Soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pH kcl
pH units
4.6
4.5
3.8
4.5
4.4
s-TAA pH 6.5
%w/w S
0.02
0.04
0.08
0.02
0.02
25
50
10
15
TAA pH 6.5
moles H /t
12
%w/w
<0.005
0.04
<0.005
0.13
0.11
<3
25
<3
80
71
moles H /t
SHCl
%w/w S
[NT]
0.008
0.005
0.016
0.014
SKCl
%w/w S
0.007
0.006
<0.005
0.009
0.008
SNAS
%w/w S
[NT]
<0.005
<0.005
0.007
0.006
ANCBT
% CaCO3
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
s-ANCBT
%w/w S
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
s-Net Acidity
%w/w S
0.02
0.08
0.08
0.15
0.14
a-Net Acidity
moles H /t
12
51
53
94
90
Liming rate
kg
CaCO 3/t
0.94
3.8
4.0
7.1
6.8
moles H+/t
12
51
53
94
90
kg
CaCO 3/t
0.94
3.8
4.0
7.1
6.8
Chromium Suite
Our Reference:
UNITS
76925-A-10
76925-A-11
76925-A-12
76925-A-13
Your Reference
-------------
BH01
BH02
BH12
BH01
Depth
------------
3.0
5.0
1.7
1.0
26/07/2012
Soil
23/07/2012
Soil
27/07/2012
Soil
26/07/2012
Soil
pH units
4.1
4.5
4.1
4.1
s-TAA pH 6.5
%w/w S
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
TAA pH 6.5
moles H+/t
25
17
27
32
%w/w
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<3
Date Sampled
Type of sample
pH kcl
moles H /t
<3
<3
<3
SHCl
%w/w S
<0.005
<0.005
0.006
0.005
SKCl
%w/w S
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
SNAS
%w/w S
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
ANCBT
% CaCO3
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
s-ANCBT
%w/w S
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
s-Net Acidity
%w/w S
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.05
a-Net Acidity
moles H /t
25
17
29
34
Liming rate
kg
CaCO 3/t
1.9
1.3
2.1
2.6
moles H+/t
25
17
29
34
kg
CaCO 3/t
1.9
1.3
2.1
2.6
Revision No:
76925-A
R 00
Page 2 of 5
Client Reference:
Method ID
Inorg-068
Methodology Summary
Chromium Reducible Sulfur - Hydrogen Sulfide is quantified by iodometric titration after distillation to determine
potential acidity. Based on Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines, Version 2.1 - June 2004.
Revision No:
76925-A
R 00
Page 3 of 5
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
Chromium Suite
Duplicate results
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
pH kcl
pH units
Inorg-068
[NT]
76925-A-2
4.6 || 4.6 || RPD: 0
LCS
100%
s-TAA pH 6.5
%w/w
S
0.01
Inorg-068
<0.01
76925-A-2
0.02 || 0.02 || RPD: 0
[NR]
[NR]
TAA pH 6.5
moles
H+/t
Inorg-068
<5
76925-A-2
12 || 15 || RPD: 22
LCS
104%
Chromium Reducible
Sulfur
%w/w
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
76925-A-2
<0.005 || <0.005
LCS
123%
a-Chromium Reducible
Sulfur
moles
H+/t
Inorg-068
<3
76925-A-2
<3 || <3
[NR]
[NR]
SHCl
%w/w
S
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
SKCl
%w/w
S
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
76925-A-2
0.007 || 0.007 || RPD: 0
LCS
87%
SNAS
%w/w
S
0.005
Inorg-068
<0.005
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
ANCBT
%
CaCO 3
0.05
Inorg-068
<0.05
76925-A-2
<0.05 || <0.05
[NR]
[NR]
s-ANCBT
%w/w
S
0.05
Inorg-068
<0.05
76925-A-2
<0.05 || <0.05
[NR]
[NR]
s-Net Acidity
%w/w
S
0.01
Inorg-068
<0.01
76925-A-2
0.02 || 0.02 || RPD: 0
[NR]
[NR]
a-Net Acidity
moles
H+/t
10
Inorg-068
<10
76925-A-2
12 || 15 || RPD: 22
[NR]
[NR]
Liming rate
kg
CaCO 3
0.75
Inorg-068
<0.75
76925-A-2
0.94 || 1.1 || RPD: 16
[NR]
[NR]
/t
a-Net Acidity without

ANCE
moles
H+/t
10
Inorg-068
<10
76925-A-2
12 || 15 || RPD: 22
[NR]
[NR]
kg
CaCO 3
0.75
Inorg-068
<0.75
76925-A-2
0.94 || 1.1 || RPD: 16
[NR]
[NR]
/t
Revision No:
76925-A
R 00
Page 4 of 5
Client Reference:
Report Comments:


<: Less than


>: Greater than
NT: Not tested


Revision No:
76925-A
R 00
Page 5 of 5
77504
Client:
100 Christie St
St Leonards
NSW 2065
Attention:
David Andrew

Your Reference:
No. of samples:
NB11462, Wyong Rd Interchange

3 waters, 14 soils
17/08/12
/ 17/08/12
Analysis Details:
Report Details:
24/08/12
/
24/08/12
Not Issued
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 1 of 19
Client Reference:
vTRH & BTEX in Soil

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
vTRH C6 - C 9
mg/kg
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
Benzene
mg/kg
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
Toluene
mg/kg
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
m+p-xylene
mg/kg
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
o-Xylene
mg/kg
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
105
102
98
99
98
vTRH & BTEX in Soil

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-13
77504-15
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH11
BH01
BH02
Depth
------------
0.4
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
vTRH C6 - C 9
mg/kg
<25
<25
<25
Benzene
mg/kg
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
Toluene
mg/kg
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg
<1
<1
<1
m+p-xylene
mg/kg
<2
<2
<2
o-Xylene
mg/kg
<1
<1
<1
Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
82
105
97
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date extracted
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 2 of 19
Client Reference:
sTRH in Soil (C10-C36)

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
TRHC 10 - C 14
mg/kg
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
TRHC 15 - C 28
mg/kg
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
TRHC 29 - C 36
mg/kg
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
84
82
82
81
83
Surrogate o-Terphenyl
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-13
77504-15
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH11
BH01
BH02
Depth
------------
Date Sampled
Type of sample
0.4
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
22/08/2012
TRHC 10 - C 14
mg/kg
<50
<50
<50
TRHC 15 - C 28
mg/kg
<100
<100
100
TRHC 29 - C 36
mg/kg
<100
150
<100
83
86
85
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 3 of 19
Client Reference:
PAHs in Soil
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
Naphthalene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Acenaphthene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Fluorene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Phenanthrene
mg/kg
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
0.1
Anthracene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Fluoranthene
mg/kg
0.4
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
Chrysene
mg/kg
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.1
Benzo(b+k)fluoranthene
mg/kg
0.3
<0.2
<0.2
0.4
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg
0.19
<0.05
<0.05
0.25
0.13
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
mg/kg
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
mg/kg
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.1
Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
95
95
96
93
95
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-13
77504-15
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH11
BH01
BH02
Depth
------------
PAHs in Soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
0.4
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
Naphthalene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Acenaphthene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Fluorene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Phenanthrene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
Anthracene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Fluoranthene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
1.0
Pyrene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
Chrysene
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
mg/kg
<0.2
<0.2
1.5
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg
<0.05
<0.05
0.98
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
0.8
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
0.9
95
91
67
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 4 of 19
Client Reference:
Organochlorine Pesticides in soil

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
HCB
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
alpha-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
gamma-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
beta-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Heptachlor
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
delta-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Aldrin
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Heptachlor Epoxide
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
gamma-Chlordane
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
alpha-chlordane
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endosulfan I
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
pp-DDE
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Dieldrin
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endrin
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
pp-DDD
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endosulfan II
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
pp-DDT
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endrin Aldehyde
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endosulfan Sulphate
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Methoxychlor
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Surrogate TCMX
100
99
104
96
98
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 5 of 19
Client Reference:
Organochlorine Pesticides in soil

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-13
77504-15
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH11
BH01
BH02
Depth
------------
0.4
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
HCB
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
alpha-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
gamma-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
beta-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Heptachlor
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
delta-BHC
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Aldrin
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Heptachlor Epoxide
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
gamma-Chlordane
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
alpha-chlordane
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endosulfan I
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
pp-DDE
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Dieldrin
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endrin
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
pp-DDD
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endosulfan II
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
pp-DDT
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endrin Aldehyde
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Endosulfan Sulphate
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Methoxychlor
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Surrogate TCMX
96
93
97
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 6 of 19
Client Reference:
PCBs in Soil
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
Arochlor 1016
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1221
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1232
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1242
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1248
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1254
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1260
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Surrogate TCLMX
100
99
104
96
98
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-13
77504-15
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH11
BH01
BH02
Depth
------------
PCBs in Soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
0.4
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date extracted
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
Arochlor 1016
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1221
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1232
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1242
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1248
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1254
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Arochlor 1260
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Surrogate TCLMX
96
93
97
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 7 of 19
Client Reference:
Acid Extractable metals in soil

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date digested
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Arsenic
mg/kg
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
Cadmium
mg/kg
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
Chromium
mg/kg
130
20
Copper
mg/kg
21
26
13
Lead
mg/kg
26
20
27
18
Mercury
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Nickel
mg/kg
10
17
Zinc
mg/kg
61
37
20
29

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-12
77504-13
77504-14
77504-15
77504-16
Your Reference
-------------
BH05
BH11
BH07
BH01
BH10
Depth
------------
Date Sampled
Type of sample
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date digested
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Date analysed
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
21/08/2012
Arsenic
mg/kg
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
Cadmium
mg/kg
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
Chromium
mg/kg
11
10
11
Copper
mg/kg
23
14
14
13
Lead
mg/kg
27
13
10
Mercury
mg/kg
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Nickel
mg/kg
Zinc
mg/kg
98
11
44
50
44

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH02
Depth
------------
Date Sampled
Type of sample
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
Date digested
21/08/2012
Date analysed
21/08/2012
Arsenic
mg/kg
<4
Cadmium
mg/kg
<0.5
Chromium
mg/kg
16
Copper
mg/kg
28
Lead
mg/kg
64
Mercury
mg/kg
<0.1
Nickel
mg/kg
15
Zinc
mg/kg
120
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 8 of 19
Client Reference:
Moisture
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date prepared
21/08/12
21/08/12
21/08/12
21/08/12
21/08/12
Date analysed
22/08/12
22/08/12
22/08/12
22/08/12
22/08/12
Moisture
9.7
17
16
12
7.1
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-12
77504-13
77504-14
77504-15
77504-16
Your Reference
-------------
BH05
BH11
BH07
BH01
BH10
Depth
------------
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
21/08/12
21/08/12
21/08/12
21/08/12
21/08/12
Date analysed
22/08/12
22/08/12
22/08/12
22/08/12
22/08/12
Moisture
3.2
10
8.1
5.9
5.8
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH02
Depth
------------
Moisture
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date prepared
Moisture
Date Sampled
Type of sample
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
Date prepared
21/08/12
Date analysed
22/08/12
Moisture
27
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 9 of 19
Client Reference:
Asbestos ID - soils
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-4
77504-6
77504-7
77504-8
77504-11
Your Reference
-------------
TP01
TP02
TP02
TP03
BH04
Depth
------------
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
Sample mass tested
Approx 40g
Approx 40g
Approx 40g
Approx 40g
Approx 40g
Sample Description
Brown finegrained soil &

rocks

rocks

rocks

rocks

rocks
Asbestos ID in soil
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
Trace Analysis
No respirable
fibres
detected
No respirable
fibres
detected
No respirable
fibres
detected
No respirable
fibres
detected
No respirable
fibres
detected
Asbestos ID - soils
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-13
77504-15
77504-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH11
BH01
BH02
Depth
------------
0.4
0.3
0.3
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
09/08/2012
soil
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date analysed
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
23/08/2012
Sample mass tested
Approx 40g
Approx 40g
Approx 40g
Sample Description
Light brown
fine-grained
soil & rocks

rocks

rocks
Asbestos ID in soil
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
No asbestos
detected at
reporting limit
of 0.1g/kg
Trace Analysis
No respirable
fibres
detected
No respirable
fibres
detected
No respirable
fibres
detected
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 10 of 19
Client Reference:
Miscellaneous Inorganics
Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-1
77504-2
77504-3
Your Reference
-------------
BH07
BH10
BH11
Depth
------------
09/08/2012
Water
09/08/2012
Water
09/08/2012
Water
Date Sampled
Type of sample
Date prepared
17/08/2012
17/08/2012
17/08/2012
Date analysed
17/08/2012
17/08/2012
17/08/2012
pH
pH Units
7.2
7.2
5.9
Electrical Conductivity
S/cm
1,500
1,600
160
Chloride, Cl
mg/L
260
250
34
Sulphate, SO4
mg/L
64
51
12
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 11 of 19
Client Reference:
Method ID
Methodology Summary
Org-016
Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS.
Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS.
Org-003
Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed
by GC-FID.
Org-012 subset
Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by
GC-MS.
Org-005
Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by
GC with dual ECD's.
Org-006
Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by
GC-ECD.
Metals-020 ICPAES
Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.
Metals-021 CVAAS
Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.
Inorg-008
Moisture content determined by heating at 105 deg C for a minimum of 4 hours.
ASB-001
Asbestos ID - Qualitative identification of asbestos in bulk samples using Polarised Light Microscopy and
Dispersion Staining Techniques including Synthetic Mineral Fibre and Organic Fibre as per Australian Standard
4964-2004.
Inorg-001
pH - Measured using pH meter and electrode in accordance with APHA 22nd ED, 4500-H+.
Inorg-002
Conductivity and Salinity - measured using a conductivity cell and dedicated meter, in accordance with APHA
22nd ED 2510 and Rayment & Lyons.
Inorg-081
Anions - a range of Anions are determined by Ion Chromatography, in accordance with APHA 22nd ED, 4110
-B.
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 12 of 19
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
vTRH & BTEX in Soil
Duplicate results
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
Date extracted
21/08/2
012
77504-4
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
LCS-2
21/08/2012
Date analysed
22/08/2
012
77504-4
22/08/2012 || 22/08/2012
LCS-2
22/08/2012
vTRH C6 - C 9
mg/kg
25
Org-016
<25
77504-4
<25 || <25
LCS-2
103%
Benzene
mg/kg
0.2
Org-016
<0.2
77504-4
<0.2 || <0.2
LCS-2
92%
Toluene
mg/kg
0.5
Org-016
<0.5
77504-4
<0.5 || <0.5
LCS-2
101%
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg
Org-016
<1
77504-4
<1 || <1
LCS-2
100%
m+p-xylene
mg/kg
Org-016
<2
77504-4
<2 || <2
LCS-2
110%
o-Xylene
mg/kg
Org-016
<1
77504-4
<1 || <1
LCS-2
114%
Surrogate aaaTrifluorotoluene
Org-016
104
77504-4
105 || 105 || RPD: 0
LCS-2
105%
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
Duplicate results
Date extracted
21/08/2
012
77504-4
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
LCS-3
21/08/2012
Date analysed
22/08/2
012
77504-4
22/08/2012 || 22/08/2012
LCS-3
22/08/2012
TRHC 10 - C 14
mg/kg
50
Org-003
<50
77504-4
<50 || <50
LCS-3
90%
TRHC 15 - C 28
mg/kg
100
Org-003
<100
77504-4
<100 || <100
LCS-3
102%
TRHC 29 - C 36
mg/kg
100
Org-003
<100
77504-4
<100 || <100
LCS-3
86%
QUALITY CONTROL
%
UNITS
Org-003
PQL
METHOD
82
Blank
77504-4
Duplicate
Sm#
PAHs in Soil
84 || 81 || RPD: 4
Duplicate results
LCS-3
120%
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
Date extracted
21/08/2
012
77504-4
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
LCS-3
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2
012
77504-4
23/08/2012 || 23/08/2012
LCS-3
23/08/2012
Naphthalene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-3
85%
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Acenaphthene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Fluorene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-3
89%
Phenanthrene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
0.2 || 0.2 || RPD: 0
LCS-3
83%
Anthracene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Fluoranthene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
0.4 || 0.4 || RPD: 0
LCS-3
80%
Pyrene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
0.3 || 0.4 || RPD: 29
LCS-3
85%
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
0.1 || 0.2 || RPD: 67
[NR]
[NR]
Chrysene
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
0.2 || 0.2 || RPD: 0
LCS-3
82%
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 13 of 19
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
PAHs in Soil
Duplicate results
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
mg/kg
0.2
Org-012
subset
<0.2
77504-4
0.3 || 0.3 || RPD: 0
[NR]
[NR]
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg
0.05
Org-012
subset
<0.05
77504-4
0.19 || 0.22 || RPD: 15
LCS-3
83%
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
0.2 || 0.2 || RPD: 0
[NR]
[NR]
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
mg/kg
0.1
Org-012
subset
<0.1
77504-4
0.2 || 0.2 || RPD: 0
[NR]
[NR]
Surrogate p-Terphenyld14
Org-012
subset
95
77504-4
95 || 95 || RPD: 0
LCS-3
91%
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
Organochlorine
Pesticides in soil
Duplicate results
Date extracted
21/08/2
012
77504-4
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
LCS-2
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2
012
77504-4
23/08/2012 || 23/08/2012
LCS-2
23/08/2012
HCB
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
alpha-BHC
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
93%
gamma-BHC
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
beta-BHC
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
112%
Heptachlor
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
86%
delta-BHC
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Aldrin
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
79%
Heptachlor Epoxide
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
93%
gamma-Chlordane
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
alpha-chlordane
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Endosulfan I
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
pp-DDE
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
112%
Dieldrin
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
116%
Endrin
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
98%
pp-DDD
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
102%
Endosulfan II
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
pp-DDT
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Endrin Aldehyde
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Endosulfan Sulphate
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
103%
Methoxychlor
mg/kg
0.1
Org-005
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Surrogate TCMX
Org-005
103
77504-4
100 || 97 || RPD: 3
LCS-2
97%
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 14 of 19
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
PCBs in Soil
Duplicate results
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
Date extracted
21/08/2
012
77504-4
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
LCS-2
21/08/2012
Date analysed
23/08/2
012
77504-4
23/08/2012 || 23/08/2012
LCS-2
23/08/2012
Arochlor 1016
mg/kg
0.1
Org-006
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Arochlor 1221
mg/kg
0.1
Org-006
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Arochlor 1232
mg/kg
0.1
Org-006
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Arochlor 1242
mg/kg
0.1
Org-006
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Arochlor 1248
mg/kg
0.1
Org-006
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Arochlor 1254
mg/kg
0.1
Org-006
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-2
103%
Arochlor 1260
mg/kg
0.1
Org-006
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Surrogate TCLMX
QUALITY CONTROL
%
UNITS
Org-006
PQL
METHOD
103
Blank
77504-4
Duplicate
Sm#
Acid Extractable metals

in soil
100 || 97 || RPD: 3
Duplicate results
LCS-2
95%
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
Date digested
21/08/2
012
77504-4
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
LCS-1
21/08/2012
Date analysed
21/08/2
012
77504-4
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
LCS-1
21/08/2012
Arsenic
mg/kg
Metals-020
ICP-AES
<4
77504-4
<4 || <4
LCS-1
94%
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.5
Metals-020
ICP-AES
<0.5
77504-4
<0.5 || <0.5
LCS-1
101%
Chromium
mg/kg
Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1
77504-4
130 || 99 || RPD: 27
LCS-1
99%
Copper
mg/kg
Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1
77504-4
21 || 22 || RPD: 5
LCS-1
98%
Lead
mg/kg
Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1
77504-4
26 || 21 || RPD: 21
LCS-1
97%
Mercury
mg/kg
0.1
Metals-021
CV-AAS
<0.1
77504-4
<0.1 || <0.1
LCS-1
93%
Nickel
mg/kg
Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1
77504-4
10 || 12 || RPD: 18
LCS-1
99%
Zinc
mg/kg
Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1
77504-4
61 || 65 || RPD: 6
LCS-1
97%
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 15 of 19
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Moisture
Date prepared
[NT]
Date analysed
[NT]
Moisture
QUALITY CONTROL
0.1
UNITS
Inorg-008
[NT]
PQL
METHOD
Blank
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Asbestos ID - soils
Date analysed
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
[NT]
Duplicate
Sm#
Miscellaneous Inorganics
Duplicate results
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
Date prepared
17/08/2
012
77504-1
17/08/2012 || 17/08/2012
LCS-W1
17/08/2012
Date analysed
17/08/2
012
77504-1
17/08/2012 || 17/08/2012
LCS-W1
17/08/2012
pH
pH Units
Inorg-001
[NT]
77504-1
7.2 || 7.2 || RPD: 0
LCS-W1
102%
Electrical Conductivity
S/cm
Inorg-002
<1
77504-1
1500 || 1400 || RPD: 7
LCS-W1
102%
Chloride, Cl
mg/L
Inorg-081
<1
77504-1
260 || 260 || RPD: 0
LCS-W1
91%
Sulphate, SO4
mg/L
Inorg-081
<1
77504-1
64 || 64 || RPD: 0
LCS-W1
103%
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
Dup. Sm#
vTRH & BTEX in Soil
Duplicate
Spike Sm#
Spike % Recovery
Base + Duplicate + %RPD
Date extracted
77504-17
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
77504-6
21/08/2012
Date analysed
77504-17
22/08/2012 || 22/08/2012
77504-6
22/08/2012
vTRH C6 - C 9
mg/kg
77504-17
<25 || <25
77504-6
89%
Benzene
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.2 || <0.2
77504-6
78%
Toluene
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.5 || <0.5
77504-6
89%
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg
77504-17
<1 || <1
77504-6
89%
m+p-xylene
mg/kg
77504-17
<2 || <2
77504-6
94%
o-Xylene
mg/kg
77504-17
<1 || <1
77504-6
97%
Surrogate aaaTrifluorotoluene
77504-17
97 || 96 || RPD: 1
77504-6
104%
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
Dup. Sm#
Duplicate
Spike Sm#
Spike % Recovery
Date extracted
77504-17
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
77504-6
21/08/2012
Date analysed
77504-17
22/08/2012 || 22/08/2012
77504-6
22/08/2012
TRHC 10 - C 14
mg/kg
77504-17
<50 || <50
77504-6
87%
TRHC 15 - C 28
mg/kg
77504-17
100 || <100
77504-6
106%
TRHC 29 - C 36
mg/kg
77504-17
<100 || <100
77504-6
77%
77504-17
85 || 83 || RPD: 2
77504-6
121%
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 16 of 19
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
Dup. Sm#
PAHs in Soil

Duplicate
Spike Sm#
Spike % Recovery
Date extracted
77504-17
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
77504-4
21/08/2012
Date analysed
77504-17
23/08/2012 || 23/08/2012
77504-4
23/08/2012
Naphthalene
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
77504-4
111%
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Acenaphthene
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Fluorene
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
77504-4
92%
Phenanthrene
mg/kg
77504-17
0.3 || <0.1
77504-4
85%
Anthracene
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Fluoranthene
mg/kg
77504-17
1.0 || 0.1 || RPD: 164
77504-4
82%
Pyrene
mg/kg
77504-17
1.1 || 0.1 || RPD: 167
77504-4
87%
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg
77504-17
0.7 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
Chrysene
mg/kg
77504-17
0.7 || <0.1
77504-4
83%
mg/kg
77504-17
1.5 || <0.2
[NR]
[NR]
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg
77504-17
0.98 || 0.08 || RPD: 170
77504-4
85%
mg/kg
77504-17
0.8 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
mg/kg
77504-17
0.1 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
mg/kg
77504-17
0.9 || <0.1
[NR]
[NR]
77504-17
67 || 124 || RPD: 60
77504-4
93%
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
Dup. Sm#
Duplicate
Organochlorine Pesticides
in soil
Date extracted
77504-17
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
Date analysed
77504-17
23/08/2012 || 23/08/2012
HCB
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
alpha-BHC
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
gamma-BHC
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
beta-BHC
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Heptachlor
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
delta-BHC
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Aldrin
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Heptachlor Epoxide
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
gamma-Chlordane
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
alpha-chlordane
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Endosulfan I
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
pp-DDE
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Dieldrin
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Endrin
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
pp-DDD
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Endosulfan II
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
pp-DDT
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Endrin Aldehyde
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 17 of 19
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
Dup. Sm#
Organochlorine Pesticides
in soil

Duplicate
Endosulfan Sulphate
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Methoxychlor
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Surrogate TCMX
77504-17
97 || 100 || RPD: 3
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
Dup. Sm#
Duplicate
PCBs in Soil
Date extracted
77504-17
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
Date analysed
77504-17
23/08/2012 || 23/08/2012
Arochlor 1016
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Arochlor 1221
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Arochlor 1232
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Arochlor 1242
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Arochlor 1248
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Arochlor 1254
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Arochlor 1260
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
Surrogate TCLMX
77504-17
97 || 100 || RPD: 3
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
Dup. Sm#
Acid Extractable metals in

soil
Duplicate
Spike Sm#
Spike % Recovery
Date digested
77504-17
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
77504-6
21/08/2012
Date analysed
77504-17
21/08/2012 || 21/08/2012
77504-6
21/08/2012
Arsenic
mg/kg
77504-17
<4 || <4
77504-6
92%
Cadmium
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.5 || <0.5
77504-6
94%
Chromium
mg/kg
77504-17
16 || 14 || RPD: 13
77504-6
94%
Copper
mg/kg
77504-17
28 || 27 || RPD: 4
77504-6
93%
Lead
mg/kg
77504-17
64 || 53 || RPD: 19
77504-6
85%
Mercury
mg/kg
77504-17
<0.1 || <0.1
77504-6
99%
Nickel
mg/kg
77504-17
15 || 14 || RPD: 7
77504-6
95%
Zinc
mg/kg
77504-17
120 || 110 || RPD: 9
77504-6
74%
Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 18 of 19
Client Reference:
Report Comments:
Asbestos: A portion of the supplied sample was sub-sampled for asbestos analysis according to Envirolab procedures.
We cannot guarantee that this sub-sample is indicative of the entire sample. Envirolab recommends supplying
40-50g of sample in its own container.
PAH's in soil: The RPD for duplicate results is accepted due to the non homogenous nature of the sample/s.

<: Less than
Alex Tam
Kim Femia

>: Greater than
NT: Not tested


Revision No:
77504
R 00
Page 19 of 19
77504-A
Client:
100 Christie St
St Leonards
NSW 2065
Attention:
Michael Stacey

Your Reference:
No. of samples:

Additional Testing on 1 Soil
17/08/12
/ 05/09/12
Analysis Details:
Report Details:
12/09/12
/
10/09/12
Not Issued
Revision No:
77504-A
R 00
Page 1 of 5
Client Reference:
PAHs in TCLP (USEPA 1311)

Our Reference:
UNITS
77504-A-17
Your Reference
-------------
BH02
Depth
------------
0.3
Date Sampled
Type of sample
09/08/2012
soil
pH of soil for fluid# determ.
pH units
7.7
pH of soil for fluid # determ. (acid)
pH units
1.7
Extraction fluid used
pH of final Leachate
pH units
4.9
Date extracted
07/09/2012
Date analysed
08/09/2012
Naphthalene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Acenaphthylene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Acenaphthene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Fluorene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Phenanthrene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Anthracene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Fluoranthene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Pyrene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Benzo(a)anthracene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Chrysene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Benzo(b+k)fluoranthene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.002
Benzo(a)pyrene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene - TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene in TCLP
mg/L
<0.001
91
Revision No:
77504-A
R 00
Page 2 of 5
Client Reference:
Method ID
Methodology Summary
Inorg-004
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) using AS 4439 and USEPA 1311.
EXTRACT.7
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).
Inorg-001
pH - Measured using pH meter and electrode in accordance with APHA 22nd ED, 4500-H+.
Org-012 subset
Leachates are extracted with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS.
Org-012 subset
GC-MS.
Org-012
GC-MS.
Revision No:
77504-A
R 00
Page 3 of 5
Client Reference:
QUALITY CONTROL
UNITS
PQL
METHOD
Blank
Duplicate
Sm#
PAHs in TCLP (USEPA

1311)
Duplicate results
Spike Sm#
Spike %
Recovery
Date extracted
07/09/2
012
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
07/09/2012
Date analysed
08/09/2
012
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
08/09/2012
Naphthalene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
120%
Acenaphthylene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
Acenaphthene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
Fluorene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
121%
Phenanthrene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
113%
Anthracene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
Fluoranthene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
111%
Pyrene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
129%
Benzo(a)anthracene in
TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
Chrysene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
107%
in TCLP
mg/L
0.002
Org-012
subset
<0.002
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
Benzo(a)pyrene in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
110%
- TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
in TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene in
TCLP
mg/L
0.001
Org-012
subset
<0.001
[NT]
[NT]
[NR]
[NR]
Org-012
73
[NT]
[NT]
LCS-W3
67%
Revision No:
77504-A
R 00
Page 4 of 5
Client Reference:
Report Comments:


<: Less than


>: Greater than
NT: Not tested


Revision No:
77504-A
R 00
Page 5 of 5
Appendix E Undrained Shear Strength

and Over Consolidation Ratio Profiles
E1:
Su and OCR Profile at each CPT Location
E2:
Su and OCR Profile along Road Chainage Sections

62
E1:
Su and OCR Profile at each CPT Location

63
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
CPT 01
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT 2D
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
Profile of CPT Data, Su & OCR
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:
Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road MR335

Intersection and Approaches Upgrade
DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
Roads and Maritime Services
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
01
Depth (m)
qc (MPa)
0
Rf (%)
8
10
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
Depth (m)
CPT 02
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
UNIT 2D
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
02
Depth (m)
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
Depth (m)
CPT 03
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
UNIT 2D
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
03
Depth (m)
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
Depth (m)
CPT 04
OCR
200
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT 2D
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
04
Depth (m)
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
Depth (m)
CPT 05
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT 1B
UNIT 2D
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
05
Depth (m)
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
Depth (m)
CPT 06
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT 2D
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
06
Depth (m)
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
Depth (m)
CPT 07
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
UNIT 2E
UNIT 3A
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
07
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
CPT 08
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT 2A
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
08
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
CPT 08a
qc (MPa)
0
10
Rf (%)
4
Su (kPa)
6
50
100
150
200
OCR
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
UNIT 2A
UNIT 2B
UNIT 3A
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
09
Depth(m)
Depth(m)
CPT09
qc (MPa)
0
Su(kPa)
Rf (%)
8
10
50
100
150
OCR
200
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
UNIT2E
UNIT2A
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT2B
UNIT2B/2E
UNIT3A
UNIT4A
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
ProfileofCPTData,Su&OCR
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:
PacificHighwayHW10andWyongRoadMR335
IntersectionandApproachesUpgrade
DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
RoadsandMaritimeServices
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
10
Depth(m)
Depth(m)
CPT10
qc (MPa)
0
Su(kPa)
Rf (%)
8
10
50
100
150
OCR
200
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT2E
UNIT2A
UNIT2B
UNIT2E
UNIT2C
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:
DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
11
Depth(m)
Depth(m)
CPT11
qc (MPa)
0
Su(kPa)
Rf (%)
8
10
50
100
150
OCR
200
250
300
12
16
20
24
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
UNIT2E
UNIT2F
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
20.00
21.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
UNIT2E
UNIT2C
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:
DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
12
E2:
Su and OCR Profile along Road Chainage Sections

64
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
CH 0 - 300
OCR
Su (kPa)
0
100
200
300
400
500
10
20
30
40
50
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
CPT01
CPT01
CPT02
CPT02
CPT03
CPT03
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
Su & OCR Correlated from CPT Data (CH 0 - 300)
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
01
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
CH 360 - 540
Su (kPa)
0
100
200
OCR
300
400
500
10
20
30
40
50
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
CPT06
CPT06
CPT08
CPT08
CPT08a
CPT08a
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
02
Depth (m)
0
100
200
Depth (m)
CH 540 - 720
Su (kPa)
OCR
300
400
500
10
20
30
40
50
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
6.00
6.00
7.00
7.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
11.00
11.00
12.00
12.00
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
17.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
20.00
CPT09
CPT09
CPT10
CPT10
21.00
22.00
DRAWN:
YC
TITLE:
CHECKED:
SRR
PROJECT:

DATE:
07.11.2012
CLIENT:
SCALE:
NTS
PROJECT
NO:
NB11462
FIGURE
NO:
03

Wyong Road Enviro Factors Appendix P

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wyong Road Enviro Factors Appendix P

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Appendix P

Geotechnical investigations report

NB11462 Pacific Highway and Wyong Road intersection upgrade

Pacific Highway HW10 and Wyong Road

Geotechnical Investigations Report

Geotechnical Investigations Report

3.6.1. RMS pavement investigation: 2523/01

Site visit and inspection

Scope of geotechnical investigations

4.3.1. Monitoring wells

Cone Penetration Testing (CPTu) and Shear vane testing (Su)

Result of geotechnical investigations

6.2.1. (Unit 1) Fill

NB11462-ESG-RP-0002_B_Geotechnical Investigations Report.docx

Geotechnical Investigations Report

6.2.3. (Unit 3A) Residual soil

Interpretation of CPTu Data

Appendix A Site investigation location plan and geotechnical sections 45

Appendix C Explanatory notes and engineering logs

Appendix D Laboratory test certificates

Appendix E Undrained Shear Strength and Over Consolidation Ratio

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

Document history and status

RMS Project Manager

RMS Project Manager

27 November 2012 05:51 PM

NB11462-ESG-RP-0002_B_Geotechnical Investigations Report.docx

Roads and Maritime Services (RMS)

Pacific Highway & Wyong Road Intersection and Approaches Upgrade

Geotechnical Investigations Report

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

Undertaking of geotechnical site investigations including: borehole drilling, test pit

Providing a summary of the laboratory test result.

Preparation of a ground model for the project alignment.

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

1.3. Report structure

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

RW-D: L Shaped Wall and associated footprint for embankment. Up to 3.0 m in

Proposed rail over-bridge and abutments. Including a proposed precast Super T

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

Soil Landscape and Geology Maps including:

Australian Soil Resource Information System (CSIRO, 2006).

NSW Natural Resource Atlas (DNR, 2012).

RMS Pavement Design Reports including:

Pavement Design Report: Tuggerah Intersection Improvement Pavement

Pavement Design Report: Tuggerah Intersection Improvement Stage 2 East of

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

3.2. Soils and geology

Figure 3.1 geology extract (GSNSW, 2003)

SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ

Geotechnical Investigations Report

Table 3.1 Soil and Geological Units

(wo) Woodburys Bridge

The Woodburys Bridge soil landscape is characterised by gently undulating rises

3.3. Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS) assessment