Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
T. S. Eliot wrote Time present and time past are both present in time
future. A nation which alienates itself from its past should struggle in
future. In case of India we also quite ignorant about our glorious past and in
every field we want to follow the western countries blindly. We also feel
pride to criticize Indian literature. We read Homer, but do not read Vyasa or
Valmiki and thus could not know what a splendid confluence of literature
and philosophy and all conceivable thoughts and cultural heritage was there.
In its all-pervasive manifestation of human character the Mahabharata was
unparallel. We read Shakespeare and other masters of western literature, but
do not read Kalidas and thus could not know what a world of truth, good and
beauty was created in our literature. We read Hegel, Kant, Spinoza and other
western philosophies, but do not read Shankara, Ramanuja, Hemchandra or
Nagarjuna or other Indian philosophies and thus could not know to what
spectacular height and depth philosophy could go. The thesis of Karl Marx,
one of the greatest thinkers of the world, that the economic order regulates
the social order fascinated us. But we could not know that hundreds and
hundreds of years before Karl Marx, our Kautilya in his Arthasastra
pronounced this thesis and said "Artha Eva Pradhanah". In this context this
paper is a study on the role of Dharma in ancient Indian jurisprudence and
its impact on the contemporary period. In this paper first Dharma has been
defined and some salient features of ancient Indian jurisprudence have been
discussed and then it has been compared with western jurisprudence. The
researcher has derived light about the superb character of ancient Indian law
1
* Aparup Pakhira, LL.M 1st Semester, National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata.
1
solidarity.
establishing
Dharma and so the property should not be used for the benefit of any
particular community or religion as before God everyone is equal. In so
many judgements Apex Court has defined Dharma outstandingly.
Dharma and Jurists:
3
Salmonds thesis that law is not might alone or right alone but a blend of
both is reflected in Dharma and Rta. Salmond defines law as the body of
principles
Our ancient Indian Criminal Jurisprudence placed the interest of the society,
the community or the State above the interest of an individual. For those of
us who have obsession for anything accidental or western, reference may be
made to the maxims Interest Republicae Supreme Lex, Salus Populi
Suprema Lex, which mean that the interest of the State, and the welfare of
the People, are the supreme laws.This is nothing but protection of human
right. Life, liberty, equality and dignity of individual have been guaranteed
as judically enforceable rights in the Constitution of India by Human Rights
Act, 1993 ;Section 2(d). Supreme Court in Maganbhai Iswarbhai
Gramaphone Co. of India, Valsamma Paul, C. Masilamani, Visakha, Apparel
Export Promotion council, and Githa Hariharan has uphold this view.
Ancient Indian Criminal Jurisprudence According to our Ancient Indian
Constitutional Law (RAJADHARMA), two of the most important duties of
the king (or the state) were (a) to punish the wrong-doer (DUSTASYA
DANDAM) and (b) to protect and honour the good people (SUJANASYA
PUJA). Which was duly called as DANDANEETI. In modern India also,
as in various other Countries, Criminal Justice Administration has, as its
main objects, adjudication of the cases relating to crimes, i.e., offences
punishable by law, punishment of the offenders, prevention of such offences
and protection of the people from the onslaught of such crimes or offences.
Environment and Ancient Indian Jurisprudence
Environmental-ecological jurisprudence is a post-Stockholm modern
development in the Euro-American world. But thousands of years ago,
reverence for nature -and its benevolence, was current coin in Indian holy
law. The Atharva Veda hymn prayerfully presses home ecology, "[Jet the
Mother Earth enriched by oceans, rivers, bounty of rains and satisfying the
entire living world by agricultural products, food grains, juicy fruits, help us
7
is not recovered then the king must make good the loss to the victim subject
Katyayana , Narada
Conclusion:
Dr. P. B. Mukharjee, a former Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court,
observed that 'this oldest system, older than the jurisprudence of Rome and
England, is surprisingly modern, and_a lot legal and historical scholars have
yet to work hard and long in this vast field of research to explore and
appreciate the wisdom, excellence and maturity of the Hindu judicial
system'. Our ancient jurisprudence was highly developed. It is still relevant
and contemporary. The present criminal justice system has many points to
learn from our illustrious past in the field of penology. India, Indian culture
has survived so many times against devastating invasions only for the reason
that the impact of Dharma is deeply rooted in the society.
Suggestions:
Applications of all these principles from our past can go a long way in
solving many problems of our present system. It is the high time we stop
looking towards western jurisprudence for everything without looking into
our own past, which is full of knowledge and wisdom. In school or college
level, students should be taught ancient Indian jurisprudence