English Pronunciation for Spanish Speakers

The Simple Vowels

The following remarks deal with the problems which native speakers of Spanish are likely to
experience with the English vowels. The type of English referred to is the General British
pronunciation (GB) and not the General American variety from which it has a small number of
notable differences.
1. The GB vowel / i: / as in seat should give no qualitative problems but it may sometimes be made
in forms inappropriately brief and yet occasionally excessively stretched. It is usually, but by no
means always, a fairly long vowel so that, given the typically short value of the qualitatively
comparable Spanish vowel, it may sound markedly brisk or clipped and possibly uncomfortably like
the more regularly short English vowel phoneme / /, as when eg seat may sound too much like sit.
The context in which it is desirable to give / i: / its minimum length is in a syllable which is closed
by one or more of the eight sharp (aka 'voiceless' or 'fortis') English consonants /p, t, k, , f, , s /
and / /.
1b. The weak vowel / i /, the final vowel in city andeasy, should give no problems if it is not made
strong (and thereby long). In America very widely and in Australasia universally there is extensive
use of / i: / instead of / i / in such final syllables.
2. The GB vowel / / as in sit has no precise equivalent in Spanish and is therefore very likely to be
attempted in a form too much like /i:/, making eg sit sound too much like seat. As diagrams show,
it's as near (in position and therefore in quality) to / / as to /i:/.
Diagrams for GB vowels and diphthongs may be seen at 3.1.46 and for Spanish vowels at 9.2 on
this website.
3. The GB vowel /e/, as in leg , should give little or no trouble.
4. The GB vowel / / as in hat is today for most British speakers about the same sort of vowel as is
represented in the spelling of Spanish by the letter a. A small minority of older British speakers and
many Americans and Australians etc have values of / / much nearer to / e /. Spanish speakers will
have to be careful not to produce it without sufficient differentiation from / / from which it now
differs so little that British native English speakers sometimes mistake each others intentions in
regard to it.
5. The GB vowel / / as in arm or calm is likely to be attempted with a quality that too much
suggests a drawled / /because the tongue has not been drawn back far enough in its production. It
is usually a fairly long vowel except before sharp (aka voiceless etc) consonants.
6. The GB vowel / / as in got sometimes tends to be attempted with too much rounding of the lips
and with such a high tongue position that it is not sufficiently differentiated from the vowel / /.
7. The GB vowel / / as in saw should give no difficulty so long as it is made fairly long without
submitting it to any degree of diphthongisation which would cause it to sound too much like / u /
or / /.
8. The GB vowel / / as in puthas no precise equivalent in Spanish and is therefore very likely to be
attempted in a form too much like / u: / but, as diagrams show, it's as near (in position and therefore
in quality) to // as to / u: /. Saying / /with rounded lips should help to produce a satisfactory / /.
9. The GB vowel / u: / as in too should give no qualitative problems but it may sometimes be
uttered in inappropriately brief (or very occasionally excessively stretched) forms. It is usually a
fairly long vowel so that, given the typically short value of the qualitatively comparable Spanish
vowel, it may sound markedly brisk or clipped and uncomfortably like the more regularly short
English vowel phoneme / /, as when eg soot may sound too much like suit. It has its minimum

length in syllables closed by one or more of the sharp consonants.

9b. The weak vowel /u/, the final vowel in eg cuckoo, w and Zulu, should give no problems if it is
not made strong (and thereby long). It is commonly replaced by the corresponding strong vowel in
various other forms of English.
10. The GB vowel / / as in cup has a higher and more back tongue posture than Spanish / a /.
11. The GB vowel / / as in fur is never very short or it would be indistinguishable from / / with
which it shares its very neutral obscure or indeterminate quality. Spanish speakers may make this
vowel too forward and therefore too much like / e / or / e /.
12. The GB vowel / / is often wrongly described as never occurring in stressed syllables though it
is quite true that only a very few words have it stressed and none of those invariably so. It is often
stressed in the adverb just (but not in the adjective) and in the first syllable of threepenny etc.
Students are best advised never to stress it.
The General British Diphthongs
13. The GB diphthong / e / as in page has a Spanish equivalent so that it should give no trouble if
sufficiently short notably before sharp consonants.
14. The GB diphthong / / as in go is rather different from the Spanish diphthong ou. If not begun
fairly centrally it may sound abnormal and too like / u /.
15. The GB diphthong / a / as in five, if not begun fairly front, may sound abnormal or too like /
i /.
16. The GB diphthong / a / as in now, if not begun front enough may sound abnormal or too like /
u /.
When either of the last two diphthongs is followed by a schwa to give / a, a / in such words as
fire and hour, the result is often a single syllable with weakening of the middle sound which usually
disappears altogether in unstressed syllables as in empireor rushhour.
17. The GB diphthong / / as in join is rarely problematical.
All the above diphthongs are usually fairly long but care must be taken to reduce them when they
are followed by sharp consonants or enclitic syllables (ones which are, or behave as if they were,
further unstressed syllables of the same word). Failure to do so will produce the effect of making
inappropriate word divisions eg instead of jokingsaying Joe King.
18. The GB diphthong / /as in near if not begun with a sufficiently central quality may strike
many British speakers as abnormal and too like / i: / though that's not very likely to cause any
misunderstanding.
19. The GB diphthong / e / as in hair may be begun too high producing the effect of / e / as in
playerthough that's not very likely to cause any misunderstanding. By a high proportion of GB
speakers it's regularly made as a long simple vowel [] so students may aim for this value if they
prefer. This latter smoothed value is used by almost all speakers unless stressed and immediately
before a break in rhythm.
20. The GB diphthong / /as in cure, if not begun with a sufficiently central quality, may strike
many British speakers as too much like / u: / as in queuer, sewer, fewer or doer though that's not
very likely to cause any misunderstanding. Like / e / it has most often its smoothed version []
unless it's stressed and comes immediately before a break in rhythm.
English Consonants for Spanish Speakers
1. Although vowel values may be strikingly different in one part of the English-speaking world

from what they are in another, the same system of consonants will be found among virtually all
educated native speakers of English worldwide. Millions of unsophisticated speakers in eg London,
New York and Dublin have no / / or / / but this is strictly limited to low-prestige varieties of
English. On the other hand, inhabitants of the Celtic countries (ie Wales, Scotland and Ireland)
usually employ a [x], ie the same sound as a Spanish jota, in various regional names and terms.
Compare the Scottish English version of loch which ends with /x/. The usual GB form of the word
has as final consonant /k/.
2. The English inventory of consonants consists of 24 units (phonemes) which can usefully be
considered in three sets of eight items each. Two of the sets are very closely parallel because each
item in them differs from its corresponding member of the other set essentially only by whether its
articulation is (ordinarily relatively) sharp or soft. The remaining set of eight is more miscellaneous.
Sharp

Soft

Other
m
n

l
r[]
j
w
h
3. Some eight of these, viz / f, , s, , m, n, j / and /w/, correspond very closely to phonemes
occurring in the Spanish language. Others can be said not to exist in Spanish, at least in Castilian,
eg // and //; but as regards most of the remaining items, the contrasts between the two languages
are more complex.
4. The 20 Spanish consonantal phonemes include five types /x, , , rr/ and // not found in English.
Voiceless

Voiced

Other
m
n

rr

j
w
5. English /p/ differs from Spanish /p/ in quality chiefly by virtue of being subject to what is known
as aspiration ie it is always followed by a marked short burst of air (of /h/ quality) whenever it
begins a stressed syllable and sometimes less noticeably by a slighter puff in other situations. This is
important because it is what keeps /p/ & /b/, /t/ & /d/ and k/ & /g/ apart in English. Hearing the
Spanish word pacharan for the first time I wrote it as bacharanwhich is a fact that should warn
students that if they fail to aspirate stressed syllable-initial /p/ etc, a native English speaker will be
very likely to interpret that attempt at /p/ etc as the correspnding soft (voiced) consonant. By
contrast, it is mainly because Spanish /b/ has voicing (accompanying vibration of the vocal folds)
that it is distinct from Spanish /p/. The same pattern of aspiration versus non aspiration applies less
obviously to English / / and / /, the sounds respectively at the beginnings and the ends ofchurch
and judge.
6. The letters b and v in English ordinarily represent quite distinct sound units of the language. On
the contrary, for Spanish they are merely variant spellings for the same phoneme. In English /b/ is
regularly a bilabial plosive while /v/ is typically a labiodental fricative. The Spanish phoneme on
the other hand is variously a bilabial plosive or fricative or approximant sound.
7. The approximant allophone (variant) of the Spanish b/v sound differs from English /w/ only by
lacking lip-rounding. Such a sound may be heard from English speakers when, as is quite often the
case in rather hurried articulation, the wordable is pronounced as [el]. The utterance-initial
plosive sometimes substituted by Spanish speakers for an English fricative (or approximant or
rarely plosive) /v/ can disguise a word eg make the word very sound like beret.
8. The English consonant // corresponds in sound quality exactly to the Spanish d at the ends of
words or within them but adjacent to an /n/ or /l/ the Spanish phoneme takes a plosive form like
English /d/. So Spanish speakers have to be particularly careful not to substitute /d/ for initial th when saying eg in that, on the, when they, although, tell them etc.

9. The sound quality of the English /s/ as attempted by some Spanish speakers is rather too similar
to the English sh sound //. Such a value is very occasionally heard as an idiosyncrasy from some
British and some American speakers (eg the American James Stewart and the British Lord William
Deedes) but it should certainly be avoided by Spanish-speaking learners.
10. The buzzing sound quality of the English /z/ is only heard in (Castilian) Spanish as an
allophonic variant value of the letter s in a word like mismo. It sounds totally abnormal to produce a
/z/ instead of an /s/ at the beginnings of English words like slow, small, snap etc.
11. English // as in she, / / as in pleasure and // as in judge do not have equivalent phonemes in
(Castilian) Spanish so care must be taken not to confuse //and // as in washing versuswatching etc
and not to substitute // for any of them.
12. All four of / , , /and / / are markedly rounded in English: Spanish speakers occasionally
fail to make them rounded enough especially in palatal contexts eg as in cheap, cheeseand chin.
13. The English type of aspirate /h/ as in how does not occur in Castilian. English /h/ is normally a
very weak sound and any attempt at it which resembles the Spanish speakers jota [x] will be likely
to sound very harsh, as would any use of the typical strongly fricative Spanish value of non-initial g
[ ].
14. English / m /as in mum corresponds exactly to Spanish /m/. However, although all three of the
English nasal phonemes /m, n, / may end syllables, only /n/ of the three Spanish nasal
phonemes /m, n, / may do so. This is reflected in the fact that Biblical names such as Abraham,
Adam, Bethlehem (Spanish Beln), Jerusalemetc end in n in their Spanish forms. It is also no doubt
responsible for the to-English-ears-alarming way in which many Spanish speakers (perhaps
especially in Andalucia) seem to have an any-nasal-will-do approach to English words ending
with /n/ like in and on etc.
15. English / /as in sing does not occur as an independent sound in Spanish though it does occur
as an accidentalvalue (an allophone) of Spanish /n/ under the influence of a following /k/, /g/ or
/x/. It is naturally quite difficult for Spanish speakers to produce an / /which is not in such a
context, especially in fluent speech when it occurs, as it so often does, in the very frequent
unstressed word ending-ing. However, it deserves careful attention because failure can sound quite
odd. The expression huntin, shootin and fishin is well known in joking reference to an upper-class
Victorian style of speech but is now associated either with persons of very little education or with
elderly aristocrats.
16. English /l/ as produced by Spanish speakers is very unlikely to occasion failure to recognise
words but it is noteworthy that English has variations in the precise quality of /l/ that are not
parallelled in Castilian. (Catalan has some rather dark varieties though not with the English pattern
of their distribution.) It is usual for GB speakers to produce adarker ie more back (meaning
tongue-retracted ie velarised or pharyngalised) version above all when /l/ is syllabic but also when it
occurs before consonants or word-finally. A minority have a neutral rather than a dark /l/
(centralised) but to have a really light (palatalised) value is to sound quite abnormal.
The English dark variety usually has a quality quite like that of the vowel / / so that eg eatable
may sound from many native English speakers quite indistinguishable from `eat a bull. Some
British speakers, chiefly those with a London tinge to their speech, tend to replace word-final
syllabic /l/ with // so that eatable becomes /`i:tb/. This is often not noticed by other British
native speakers but students are best advised not to adopt it.
17. The English /r/ is typically an altogether weaker and softer sound than the Spanish values for the
letter r. It is identified in phonetic terminology by the term 'postalveolar approximant'. The sound of
a single Spanish r between vowels is completely regularly an alveolar tap. When word-initial or
word-final, it may also be an alveolar trill, which is what is always the value of a Spanish rr.
A witness to the extreme weakness of the English /r/ is the fact that our traditional spelling has very

numerous r's no longer pronounced by most speakers in Britain, about a third of US speakers and
practically all South Africans and Australasians. Very large numbers of GB speakers omit eg the
first /r/ from common words like prescription and programwithout anyone noticing the fact not
even pronunciation lexicographers. The retention of most of the r's of the traditional spelling by GA
speakers is the biggest single difference between GB and GA.
18. Although Spanish has fairly exactly corresponding phonemes to English /j/ and /w/, there is
hardly any tendency among English speakers to tighten their articulations of these phonemes in the
way Spanish speakers often do when using English making yessound like Jess or "What whisky
dyou want" sound like "Gwot gwisky do you gwont".
19. A well-known problem for Spanish speakers is occasioned by the fact that Spanish has no wordinitial consonant clusters of the types /sl-, sm-, sn-, sp-, st-, sk-/. With these the tendency is to add
an extra syllable to words containing them as with the Spanish borrowing from English of the word
sloganwhich becomes [ez`logan] in this case with an un-English assimilation [s z] as well.
Compare the treatments of other borrowings from English into Spanish eg Scotch, slip, slot,
smoking, snob, sport, spot, stop, starter etc.
20. Various other cluster simplifications and elisions of consonants are also to be heard in Spanish
speakersEnglish at times eg as when one not too proficient speaker was reported as using an
expression Oss Forestry which turned out to be an attempt at saying Oxford Street. It is
important to remember that, although Spanish initial ex- can be reduced to /es-/ without causing
consternation, to omit /k/ from English initial ex- tends to sound embarrassingly uneducated.
21. Speakers with a Catalan background should be always careful to avoid converting word-final
soft consonants eg /b, d, g, v, z/ etc into the corresponding sharp ones /p, t, k, f, s/ etc.
Recommended further reading: A Course in English Phonetics for Spanish Speakers by D. F. Finch
& H. Ortiz Lira. English Phonetics and Phonology for Spanish Speakers by Brian Mott.