You are on page 1of 22

Test 1 Review

Reference:

Test 1 Review

Sections:
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8 of

Professor Deepa Kundur


University of Toronto

S. Haykin and M. Moher, Introduction to Analog & Digital Communications, 2nd


ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007. ISBN-13 978-0-471-43222-7.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

1 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

2 / 87

Communication Systems: Foundational Theories


I

Chapter 2: Fourier Representation of


Signals and Systems

Modulation Theory: piggy-back information-bearing signal on a


carrier signal
Detection Theory: estimating or detecting the
information-bearing signal in a reliable manner
Probability and Random Processes: model channel noise and
uncertainty at receiver
Fourier Analysis: view signal and system in another domain to
gain new insights
information
source

transmitter

receiver

information
consumption

channel

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

3 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

4 / 87

The Fourier Transform (FT)

Energy Signals
I

G (f ) =
Z

g (t) =

g (t)e j2ft

The energy of a signal g (t) is given by:


Z
|g (t)|2 dt

G (f )e +j2ft

If g (t) represents a voltage or a current, then we say that this is


the energy of the signal across a 1 ohm resistor.

Why? Because a current i(t) or voltage v (t) exhibits the


following energy over a R ohm resistor.

Notation:
g (t)
G (f )
G (f ) = F [g (t)]
g (t) = F1 [G (f )]

E=

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

5 / 87

Energy Signals and the Fourier Transform

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

v 2 (t)
dt
R

Test 1 Review

6 / 87

FT Synthesis and Analysis Equations

G (f ) =

Practical physically realizable signals (e.g., energy signals) that obey:


Z
|g (t)|2 dt <

g (t) =

g (t)e j2ft
G (f )e +j2ft

g (t)
G (f )

have Fourier transforms.


I

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

i (t)Rdt =

Test 1 Review

7 / 87

Since the FT is invertible both g (t) and G (f ) contain the


same information, but describe it in a different way.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

8 / 87

FT Synthesis Equation

e j2ft = cos(2ft) + j sin(2ft)


cos(2ft)

G (f )e j2ft dt

g (t) =

sin(2ft)
I

g (t) is the sum of scaled complex sinusoids

e j2ft = cos(2ft) + jsin(2ft)

complex sinusoid

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

9 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

10 / 87

|G (f )| and G (f )

FT Analysis Equation
Z

G (f ) =

g (t)e

j2ft

dt

g (t) =

Z
=

G (f )e j2f t df
|G (f )|e j(2f t+G (f )) df

The analysis equation represents the inner product between g (t)


and e j2ft .
The analysis equation states that G (f ) is a measure of similarity
between g (t) and e j2ft , the complex sinusoid at frequency f Hz.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

11 / 87

|G (f )| dictates the relative presence of the sinusoid of frequency


f in g (t).
G (f ) dictates the relative alignment of the sinusoid of
frequency f in g (t).

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

12 / 87

Low, Mid and High Frequency Signals

Importance of FT Theorems and Properties

Q: Which of the following signals appears higher in frequency?

The Fourier transform converts a signal or system representation


to the frequency-domain, which provides another way to
visualize a signal or system convenient for analysis and design.

The properties of the Fourier transform provide valuable insight


into how signal operations in the time-domain are described in
the frequency-domain.

1. cos(4 106 t + /3)


2. sin(2t + 10) + 17 cos2 (10t)

A: cos(4 106 t + /3).

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

13 / 87

FT Theorems and Properties


Property/Theorem
Notation:

Linearity:
Dilation:
Conjugation:
Duality:
Time Shifting:
Frequency Shifting:
Area Under G (f ):
Area Under g (t):
Time Differentiation:
Time Integration :
Modulation Theorem:
Convolution Theorem:
Correlation Theorem:
Rayleighs Energy Theorem:

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

14 / 87

Time-Bandwidth Product

Time Domain
g (t)
g1 (t)
g2 (t)
c1 g1 (t) + c2 g2 (t)

g (at)
g (t)
G (t)
g (t t0 )
e j2fc t g (t)
R g (0)
g (t)dt
d
g (t)
R t dt
g
( )d
R g1 (t)g2 (t)
g1 ( )g2 (t )
R

Rg1 (t)g2 (t )dt

2 dt
|g
(t)|

=
=

Test 1 Review

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Frequency Domain
G (f )
G1 (f )
G2 (f )
c1 G1 (f ) +c2G2 (f )

time-duration of a signal frequency bandwidth = constant

1
G fa
|a
G (f )

g (f )
G (f )e j2ft0
(f fc )
RG

G (f )df
G (0)
j2fG (f )
1
G (f )
j2f
R
G1 ()G2 (f )d
G1 (f )G2 (f )
G1 (f )G2 (f )
R
2
|G (f )| df

AT sinc(fT)
AT

Arect(t/T)

T larger

A
T /2

-T/2

-4/T

duration

15 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

2/T

-2/T
-3/T

-1/T

1/T

4/T
3/T

null-to-null
bandwidth

Test 1 Review

16 / 87

Time-Bandwidth Product

LTI Systems and Filtering


LTI System

time-duration of a signal frequency bandwidth = constant

impulse response

LTI System

the constant depends on the definitions of duration and


bandwidth and can change with the shape of signals being
considered

It can be shown that:


time-duration of a signal frequency bandwidth
with equality achieved for a Gaussian pulse.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

frequency response

For systems that are linear time-invariant (LTI), the Fourier transform
provides a decoupled description of the system operation on the input signal
much like when we diagonalize a matrix.

This provides a filtering perspective to how a linear time-invariant system


operates on an input signal.

The LTI system scales the sinusoidal component corresponding to frequency


f by H(f ) providing frequency selectivity.

1
4

17 / 87

Dirac Delta Function

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

Dirac Delta Function


I

Definition:
1. (t) = 0, t 6= 0
2. The area under (t) is
unity:
Z
(t)dt = 1

can be interpreted as the limiting case of a family of functions of


unit area but that become narrower and higher

all functions have


unit area

t
t

Note: (0) = undefined

T1
T2
T3
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

18 / 87

Test 1 Review

19 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

T1
T2
T3
Test 1 Review

20 / 87

Dirac Delta Function

The Fourier Transform and the Dirac Delta


(t)
1
1
e j2f0 t

e j2f1 t
e j2f1 t
+
2
2
e j2f1 t
e j2f1 t
sin(2f1 t) =

2j
2j

Sifting Property:

cos(2f1 t) =

g (t)(t t0 )dt = g (t0 )

(f )

(f f0 )
1
1

(f f1 ) + (f + f1 )
2
2
1
1

(f f1 ) (f + f1 )
2j
2j

cosine

Convolution with (t):

1
f1

1/2
t

g (t) ? (t t0 ) = g (t t0 )

1/2
f

-f1

sine

1
f1

0.5j
-f1

t
0

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

21 / 87

f1
Test 1 Review-0.5j

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Fourier Transforms of Periodic Signals

22 / 87

g(t)
A
t

g (t) =

cn e

j2nf0 t

G (f ) =

n=

ck

cn (f nf0 )

n=

sinc
-5 -4 -3
-2 -1

-2

sinc
-5

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

23 / 87

-4

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

-3
-1

Test 1 Review

24 / 87

LTI System

Transmission of Signals Through Linear Systems

Transmission of Signals Through Linear Systems


impulse response

LTI System

LTI System

impulse response

frequency response

LTI System

frequency response

Time domain:

Freqeuncy domain:
Z

x(t)
X (f )

x( )h(t )d

y (t) = x(t) ? h(t) =

Y (f ) =

X (f )

freq selective system

y (t)
Y (f )
h(t)
H(f )

Causality: Rh(t) = 0 for t < 0

Stability: |h(t)|dt <

Y (f )

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

H(f ) X (f )

Test 1 Review

25 / 87

Ideal Low-Pass Filters

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

26 / 87

Ideal Low-Pass Filters


HLP (f ) =

H(f )
| {z }

e j2f t0 |f | B
0
|f | > B


STOPBAND

STOPBAND

PASSBAND

-B

B
-B
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

hLP (t) = 2Bsinc(2B(t t0 ))

HLP (f ) =

e j2f t0
0

|f | B
|f | > B

27 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

28 / 87

Ideal Low-Pass Filters

LTI Systems, Sinusoids and Ideal Lowpass Filtering


Q: Suppose the following signals are passed through an ideal lowpass filter with
cutoff frequency W such that f1 < W < f2  fc . What are the corresponding
outputs:
1. m(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 )

hLP (t) = 2Bsinc(2B(t t0 ))

2. m(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 ) + cos(2f2 t 5 )


3. m(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 ) + cos(2fc t)

2B

4. s(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 ) cos(2fc t)

t0

5. s(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 ) sin(2fc t)

6. s(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 ) + cos2 (2fc t)

1/B

Note: cos2 A =

A: 1. sin(2f1 t +

Test 1 Review

1
2

cos(2A)

7. s(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 ) cos2 (2fc t)


8. s(t) = sin(2f1 t + 4 ) cos(2fc t) sin(2fc t)
Note: sin A cos B =

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

1
2

29 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

1
2

sin(A + B)

1
2

),
4

sin(B A)

2. sin(2f1 t + 4 ), 3. sin(2f1 t + 4 ), 4. 0,
6. sin(2f1 t + 4 ) + 12 , 7. 12 sin(2f1 t + 4 ),

Test 1 Review

5. 0,
8. 0.
30 / 87

Modulation
I

Modulation: to adjust or adapt to a certain proportion


I

Used to superimpose one signal onto another.

Chapter 3: Amplitude Modulation


I

In modulation need two things:


1. a modulated signal that is changed:
carrier signal: c(t)
2. a modulating signal that dictates how to change:
message signal: m(t)

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

31 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

32 / 87

Amplitude Modulation
I

Amplitude Modulation
Three types studied:

In modulation need two things:


1. a modulated signal: carrier signal: c(t)
2. a modulating signal: message signal: m(t)

1. Amplitude Modulation (AM)


I

(yes, it has the same name as the class of modulation techniques)

carrier:
I

c(t) = Ac cos(2fc t); phase c = 0 is assumed.

2. Double Sideband-Suppressed Carrier (DSB-SC)


I

message:
I
I

m(t) (information-bearing signal)


assume bandwidth/max freq of m(t) is W

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

3. Single Sideband (SSB)

33 / 87

Amplitude Modulation (the specific technique)

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

34 / 87

Amplitude Modulation

sAM (t) = Ac [1 + ka m(t)] cos(2fc t)


% Modulation = 100 max(ka m(t))
Suppose
I |ka m(t)| < 1 (% Modulation < 100%)
I

[1 + ka m(t)] > 0, so the envelope of sAM (t) is always positive;


no phase reversal

+
Output
-

AM +
wave -

fc  W
I

the movement of the message is much slower than the sinusoid

Then, m(t) can be recovered with an envelope detector.


Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

35 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

36 / 87

Amplitude Modulation

Double Sideband-Suppressed Carrier

sAM (t) = Ac [1 + ka m(t)] cos(2fc t)


sAM (t) = Ac [1 + ka m(t)] cos(2fc t)
= Ac cos(2fc t) +ka Ac m(t) cos(2fc t)
|
{z
}
|
{z
}
excess energy

message-bearing signal

sDSB (t) = Ac m(t) cos(2fc t)

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

37 / 87

Double Sideband-Suppressed Carrier

Transmitting only the message-bearing component of the AM


signal, requires more a complex (coherent) receiver system.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

38 / 87

Double Sideband-Suppressed Carrier


sDSB (t) = Ac m(t) cos(2fc t)

SAM(f )

f
2W

2W
SDSB(f )

f
2W

2W
SUSSB(f )
upper SSB

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

39 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

40 / 87

carrier

carrier

message

message

amplitude
modulation

amplitude
modulation

DSB-SC

DSB-SC

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

41 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

42 / 87

Double Sideband-Suppressed Carrier


carrier

message

An envelope detector will not be able to recover m(t); it will


instead recover |m(t)|.

Coherent demodulation is required.


s(t)

amplitude
modulation

Low-pass
filter

v0 (t)
Demodulated
Signal

Local
Oscillaor

DSB-SC

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Product
Modulator

Test 1 Review

43 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

44 / 87

Costas Receiver

Costas Receiver
I-Channel (in-phase coherent detector)

Coherent Demodulation
Demodulated
Signal

Low-pass
filter

Product
Modulator

v0 (t)

local oscillator output


Voltage-controlled
Oscillator

Product
Modulator

Phase
Discriminator

Demodulated
Signal

Low-pass
filter

Voltage-controlled
Oscillator

DSB-SC wave

Phase
Discriminator

DSB-SC wave
-90 degree
Phase Shifter

Product
Modulator

-90 degree
Phase Shifter

Low-pass
Filter

Product
Modulator

Test 1 Review

vQ(t)

Low-pass
Filter

Q-Channel (quadrature-phase coherent detector)

Circuit for Phase Locking

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

vI (t)

45 / 87

Multiplexing and QAM

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

46 / 87

Quadrature Amplitude Modulation


s(t) = Ac m1 (t) cos(2fc t) + Ac m2 (t) sin(2fc t)

Multiplexing: to send multiple message simultaneously


Low-pass
filter

Product
Modulator

Quadrature Amplitude Multiplexing (QAM): (a.k.a quadrature-carrier


multiplexing) amplitude modulation scheme that enables two
DSB-SC waves with independent message signals to occupy the same
channel bandwidth (i.e., same frequency channel) yet still be
separated at the receiver.

Multiplexed
Signal

-90 degree
Phase Shifter

Product
Modulator
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

47 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Low-pass
Filter
Test 1 Review

48 / 87

Quadrature Amplitude Modulation

Quadrature Amplitude Modulation

s(t) = Ac m1 (t) cos(2fc t) + Ac m2 (t) sin(2fc t)

s(t) = Ac m1 (t) cos(2fc t) + Ac m2 (t) sin(2fc t)


SDSB(f )

Suppose m1 (t) and m2 (t) are two message signals both of


bandwidth W .
QAM allows two messages to be communicated within
bandwidth 2W .

2W

2W
SQAM(f )

f
2W
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

49 / 87

2W

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

SUSSB(f )

Test 1 Review

50 / 87

upper SSB
f
W

Is there another way to gain this bandwidth efficiency?

Single Sideband

S LSSB(f )
lower SSB

Modulation:

SQAM(f )

Ac
Ac
m(t) cos(2fc t) m(t)

sin(2fc t)
2
2
W
W

sSSB (t) =
f
2W

2W

where
I the negative (positive) applies to upper SSB (lower SSB)
I m(t)

is the Hilbert transform of m(t)

SUSSB(f )
upper SSB

lower SSB

f
W

M(f )

S LSSB(f )
lower SSB
W

Test 1 Review

M(f )

m(t)

h(t) = 1/( t)

m(t)

H(f )
j

upper SSB

f
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

H(f ) = -j sgn(f )

51 / 87

-j

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

52 / 87

Single Sideband

Single Sideband

Modulation:
sSSB (t) =

m(t)

Ac
Ac
m(t) cos(2fc t) m(t)

sin(2fc t)
2
2

s(t)

s(t)

Band-pass
filter

Product
Modulator

Coherent Demodulation:
v0 (t)

Low-pass
filter

Product
Modulator

Demodulated
Signal

Local
Oscillaor

HBP(f )
upper SSB

lower SSB

lower SSB

-fc
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

fc

Note: Costas receiver will work for SSB demodulation.

upper SSB

Test 1 Review

53 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

54 / 87

Comparisons of Amplitude Modulation Techniques

Comparisons of Amplitude Modulation Techniques

AM:

DSB-SC:

sAM (t)

= Ac [1 + ka m(t)] cos(2fc t)
Ac
ka Ac
SAM (f ) =
[(f fc ) + (f + fc )] +
[M(f fc ) + M(f + fc )]
2
2

SAM(f )

sDSB (t)
SDSB (f )
2W

SAM(f )

= Ac cos(2fc t)m(t)
Ac
=
[M(f fc ) + M(f + fc )]
2
2W
SDSB(f )

f
2W

2W

2W

highest power

BT = 2W

2W
lowest complexity

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

f
2W
SUSSB(f )
Test 1 Review

2W
SUSSB(f )

SDSB(f )
I

55 / 87

lower power

BT = 2W

higher complexity

f
W

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

W
S LSSB(f )
Test 1 Review

56 / 87

SDSB(f )

Comparisons of Amplitude Modulation Techniques

Comparisons of Amplitude Modulation Techniques


f
SSB:

2W

2W
SUSSB(f )

SSB:

upper SSB

Ac
Ac
m(t) cos(2fc t)
m(t)

sin(2fc t)
2
2
 A
c
2 [M(f fc ) + M(f + fc )] |f | fc
SUSSB (f ) =
0
|f | < fc
Ac
Ac
sLSSB (t) =
m(t) cos(2fc t) +
m(t)

sin(2fc t)
2
2

0
|f | > fc
SLSSB (f ) =
Ac
[M(f

f
)
+
M(f
+
f
)]
|f
| fc
c
c
2
sUSSB (t)

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

W
S LSSB(f )
lower SSB
f
W

57 / 87

lowest power

BT = W

highest complexity

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

58 / 87

Angle Modulation
I

c(t) = Ac cos(2fc t + c ) = Ac cos(i (t))


| {z }

Chapter 4: Angle Modulation

angle

i (t) = 2fc t + c = 2fc t for c = 0


1 di (t)
fi (t) =
= fc
2 dt

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

Consider a sinusoidal carrier:

59 / 87

Angle modulation: the message signal m(t) is piggy-backed on


i (t) in some way.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

60 / 87

Angle Modulation
I

PM vs. FM

Phase Modulation (PM):


i (t)

= 2fc t + kp m(t)
1 di (t)
kp dm(t)
fi (t) =
= fc +
2 dt
2 dt
sPM (t) = Ac cos[2fc t + kp m(t)]

sPM (t)

sFM (t)

Ac cos[2fc t + kp m(t)]


Z t
Ac cos 2fc t + 2kf
m( )d
0

dg (t)
Ac cos[2fc t + kp
]
dt
Ac cos [2fc t + 2kf g (t)]

sPM (t) =
sFM (t) =

Frequency Modulation (FM):


Z
i (t) = 2fc t + 2kf

m( )d
0

fi (t)

sFM (t)

1 di (t)
= fc + kf m(t)
2 dt


Z t
Ac cos 2fc t + 2kf
m( )d
0

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

61 / 87

Modulating
wave

Integrator

Phase
Modulator

FM
wave

Modulating
wave

Differentiator

Frequency
Modulator

PM
wave

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

carrier

carrier

message

message

amplitude
modulation

amplitude
modulation

phase
modulation

phase
modulation

frequency
modulation

frequency
modulation

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

63 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

62 / 87

Test 1 Review

64 / 87

Angle Modulation

carrier

m(t)

message

Integrator

Phase
Modulator

sFM(t)

Differentiator

Frequency
Modulator

sPM(t)

amplitude
modulation

m(t)
phase
modulation

frequency
modulation
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

65 / 87

Properties of Angle Modulation

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

66 / 87

Constancy of Transmitted Power: PM

Constancy of transmitted power


Nonlinearity of angle modulation
Irregularity of zero-crossings
Difficulty in visualizing message
Bandwidth versus noise trade-off

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

67 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

68 / 87

Constancy of Transmitted Power: FM

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

Constancy of Transmitted Power: AM

69 / 87

Nonlinearity of Angle Modulation

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

70 / 87

Irregularity of Zero-Crossings

Consider PM (proof also holds for FM).


I

Suppose
s1 (t)

Ac cos [2fc t + kp m1 (t)]

s2 (t)

Ac cos [2fc t + kp m2 (t)]


I

Let m3 (t) = m1 (t) + m2 (t).

s3 (t)

Zero-crossing: instants of time at which waveform changes


amplitude from positive to negative or vice versa.

= Ac cos [2fc t + kp (m1 (t) + m2 (t))]


6= s1 (t) + s2 (t)
cos(2fc t + A + B) 6= cos(2fc t + A) + cos(2fc t + B)

Therefore, angle modulation is nonlinear.


Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

71 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

72 / 87

Zero-Crossings: PM

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Zero-Crossings: FM

Test 1 Review

73 / 87

Zero-Crossings: AM

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

74 / 87

Difficulty of Visualizing Message

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

Test 1 Review

75 / 87

Visualization of a message refers to the ability to glean insights


about the shape of m(t) from the modulated signal s(t).

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

76 / 87

Visualization: PM

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Visualization: FM

Test 1 Review

77 / 87

Visualization: AM

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

78 / 87

Bandwidth vs. Noise Trade-Off

Test 1 Review

79 / 87

Noise affects the message signal piggy-backed as amplitude


modulation more than it does when piggy-backed as angle
modulation.

The more bandwidth that the angle modulated signal takes,


typically the more robust it is to noise.

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

80 / 87

AM vs. FM

carrier

I
message

I
amplitude
modulation

AM is an older technology first successfully carried out in the


mid 1870s than FM was developed in the 1930s (by Edwin
Armstrong).
FM has better performance than AM because it is less
susceptible to noise.
FM takes up more transmission bandwidth than AM; Recall,
BT ,FM = 2f + 2fm

phase
modulation

vs.

BT ,AM = 2W or W

AM is lower complexity than FM.

frequency
modulation
Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

81 / 87

Narrow Band Frequency Modulation


I

Test 1 Review

82 / 87

Narrowband FM
Modulation:

Suppose m(t) = Am cos(2fm t).

fi (t) =

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

sFM (t) Ac cos(2fc t) Ac sin(2fc t) sin(2fm t)


|
{z
}
|
{z
} | {z }

fc + kf Am cos(2fm t) = fc + f cos(2fm t)

carrier

= kf Am frequency deviation
Z t
i (t) = 2
fi ( )d
f

90o shift of carrier

2fm
Am

Rt
0

{z
DSB-SC signal

m( )d

= 2fc t +

f
sin(2fm t) = 2fc t + sin(2fm t)
fm

Modulating
wave

f
fm
sFM (t) = Ac cos [2fc t + sin(2fm t)]

Integrator

Product
Modulator

-90 degree
Phase Shifter

For narrow band FM,  1.


Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

83 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

Narrow-band
FM wave

carrier

84 / 87

Transmission Bandwidth of FM Waves

Generation of FM Waves

A significant component of the FM signal is within the following


bandwidth:


1
BT 2f + 2fm = 2f 1 +

I
I
I

I
I

Narrowband FM modulator

m(t)

called Carsons Rule


f is the deviation of the instantaneous frequency
fm can be considered to be the maximum frequency of the
message signal

s(t)

Frequency
Multiplier

s(t)
wideband
FM wave

Crystal
Controlled frequency is
Oscillator very stable

Test 1 Review

85 / 87

Demodulation of FM Waves
d
dt

Narrow band
Modulator

For  1, BT 2f = 2kf Am
For  1, BT 2f 1 = f2f
= 2fm
/fm

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Integrator

Ideal Envelope
Detector

Frequency Discriminator: uses positive and negative slope


circuits in place of a differentiator, which is hard to implement
across a wide bandwidth
Phase Lock Loop: tracks the angle of the in-coming FM wave
which allows tracking of the embedded message


Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

87 / 87

Professor Deepa Kundur (University of Toronto)

Test 1 Review

86 / 87

You might also like