@

50

1.

2.
3.
4.

pro/mechanica

II

abstract

Design and research of Flexible bracket

Based on Production Center Shipbuilding Method
ABSTRACT
Due to the rapid changes of manufacturing tasks and production environment,
regardless of the template or tubular shifting bracket are far from being adapted the
development of modern ships. On the one hand, repetitive producing bracket is
time-consuming, labor-consuming, and material-consuming, and affected the
shipbuilding cycle; On the other hand, in the multi-ship manufacturing environment,
the shortage of venues will often take place, at the moment, Series products made and
the site of the track construction for the expansion of the shipyard capacity appears to
be particularly urgent. All the above provide us an effective and practical business
needs.
This system embarks from the improvement of tradition's shipbuilding pattern,
aim at some characteristics such as task heavy, hands over the ship cycle to be short,
lower precision in some large and middle scale shipyard's ships production, one kind
flexible system-Flexible Bracket is advanced. The goal is to speed up the reaction rate,
reduces time consumption and the material consumption, increases the shipbuilding
precision, reduces ships' construction cycle. Because in our country, at Present,
middle and small scale Shipyard basically uses the template, some well-known
shipyard like Guangzhou Shipyard, the Waigaoqiao shipyard and so on only use the
tubular active tire rack partly. However, in overseas, for example, Japan started to
apply the tubular active tire rack in the 50s. Now, in some overseas enterprises, the
tubular active tire rack has basically substituted for the template tire rack. Although
the tubular active tire rack has made some improvements on the template tire rack, but
these improvements still could not meet the ships enterprise need, because the tubular
active tire rack might carry on certain adjustment freely in the longitudinal altitude,
but it on crosswise was fixed, and the tire rack was also fixed is intransportable, this
caused the components - part - module's assembly physical distribution route to be
excessively long, the resources is consumed too much..
This paper is based on Production Center Shipbuilding Method. Here, bracket is
studied, new equipmentFlexible Bracket we have researched is universal and
III

abstract

flexible, which provides one kind of highly effective work clothes equipment and the
production method for the ships construction. The specific design innovation in the
performance are as follows: 1. Original template used for the supporting body section
is altered to coupling, using coupling's self-locking and adjustable to support the
changes of curved section, may adjust up and down. 2. Fixing active magnetism to
attract the hull surface outside plank, realizes to the hull outside plank automatic
positioning.3.using runner to adjust the horizontal distance to meet the diversification
of sheer drawing of different hull.4Change Fixed bracket to shifting bracket so that it
can be able to move to eyerywhere in Shipyard, causes the small batch, the
multi-variety ships production to realize the simple pipelining.
The article not only gives a comparative detailed description about the method of
design of Flexible Bracket, but also analyzes its innovation and advantages compared
with conventional moulding board Bracket. Then the latter of this paper describes the
key technology, that is the conversion from lines plan of hull to information of
Flexible Bracket. The paper has carried out structure analysis and the optimum
structure study of new equipment Flexible Bracket by using the software of
Pro/MECHANICA. In the process of design, virtual optimal design has been adopted
absolutely, modeling and analysis processed directly in order to make design and
analysis tightly integrated, aiming at achieving intelligent design. The article not only
gives a comparative detailed description about the way of estimation of hull mass,
but also makes an optimum structural design about the frame and coupling using two
different ways according to their complexity. Then, we work out the fittest structure
of Flexible Bracket by checking its strength. The result of this research has developed
Production Center Shipbuilding Method and Group Technology, enhanced realistic
meaning and theories vale on improving its speed and precision and reducing its cost.

Key words: tubular shifting bracket, Production Center Shipbuilding Method, Finite
Element AnalysisOptimization Group Technology

IV

abstract

ABSTRACT
Due to the rapid changes of manufacturing tasks and production environment,
regardless of the template or tubular shifting bracket are far from being adapted the
development of modern ships. On the one hand, repetitive producing bracket is
time-consuming, labor-consuming, and material-consuming, and affected the shipbuilding
cycle; On the other hand, in the multi-ship manufacturing environment, the shortage of
venues will often take place, at the moment, Series products made and the site of the track
construction for the expansion of the shipyard capacity appears to be particularly urgent. All
the above provide us an effective and practical business needs.
This paper is based on Production Center Shipbuilding Method. Here, bracket is
studied, new equipmentFlexible Bracket we have researched is universal and flexible, the
specific design innovation in the performance are as follows: It can adjust the horizontal and
vertical distance to meet the diversification of sheer drawing of different hull; Change Fixed
bracket to shifting bracket so that it can be able to move to eyerywhere in Shipyard such as
Berth, according to a certain track, and avoid the previous long transportation.
This paper combines a lot of software technology, such as modeling, finite element
analysis, simulation, and other large software. The result of this research has developed
Production Center Shipbuilding Method and Group Technology, enhanced realistic meaning
and theories vale on improving its speed and precision and reducing its cost.

Key words: tubular shifting bracket, Production Center Shipbuilding Method, Finite
Element AnalysisOptimization Group Technology

II

1.1

15~20

CADCAM

50

[1][2][3][4]

1.2
,
, ,

,
,
1

, , ,
, ,
, ,

1.2.1

,
, , ,
,
,

:
(1)
, , ,
,
(2)
,
,

(3)
, ;
, ,

(4)
, ,
,

(5)
, ()
, , ,
, ,

2003 1.5

1.2.2

1.1

; ,

; ,
,
,
,
,
, ,

: [5][6]

1.1

1.2.3
, , ,
, , ,
,

,
,
,
, ,

--

[7][8][9][10]

1.3
1.3.1

1.3.2

1.2

1.2

1.
2.

3.4.

2.1
2.1.1

2.1

2.1

1)

2)

()
1)

2)

2.1

LFP

2.1

2.1.2

6mm
2~3 6mm 1~2
2~3 1.5~2m

600~800mm

[11][12]

2.2

Flag 2942KW ( 2.1)

2.1 2942KW
9

max < [ ]
2.2

2.2

2.2.1 Plg
X
p lj
Plj
d2y
M( x )
=

y
,

= k2
2
EI
EI
EI
dx
y = c1sinkx + c 2 coskx; x = 0, y = 0; x = l, y = 0

P=

2 EI
n 2 2 EI
P
(
n

=
l2
l2

2.3

10

Plj =

2 EI min
( l) 2

2-1

E-
I min - l -

-
= 2
Z
d 4
2-2
IZ =
64
2-22-1
2 EI
Plj =
74.16KN
4l 2
Q235 E=206GPa l=2m,r=20mm
2 20
74.16KN
2.2.2
()

2.2
2.2

d=10mm

W=0.006165*d*d

1m

d= mm

m=0.0061651010=0.6165kg

d= mm

d=12mm

(kg/m)

W=0.006165*d*d

(kg/m)

m=0.006171212=0.89kg

a=20mm 1m

kg/m

W=0.00785*a*a

a= mm

11

m=0.007852020=3.14kg

1m

2.2

W=0.00785*b*d

s= mm

S=50mm,

(kg/m)

1m

m=0.0067985050=17kg
20mm4mm

W=0.00785*[d(2b-d)+0.215(R

b=

R 3.5r

*R-2r*r)]

R=

1.2 m =0.00785[4

d=

r=

3.53.5-21.21.2

(kg/m)

220-4

+0.215

30mm20mm4mm
B=

b=

30mm20mm4mm

W=0.00785*[d(B+b-d)+0.215(

D=

R 3.5r 1.2 m

R*R-2r*r)]

r=

=0.00785[4 32+20-4

R=

+0.215

kg/m

3.53.5-21.21.2 ]=1.48
kg
80mm43mm5mm m

W=0.00785[hd+2t(b-d)

kg/m

+0.349(R*R-r*r)

h=

d= b=

8R 8r 4 m

R=

=0.00785[805+2843-5

t=

+0.34988-44]=8.04kg
250mm118mm10mm

W=0.00785[hd+2t(b-d)+0.6

(kg/m)

15(R*R-r*r)]

h= d=
b=
R=
t=

m
t 13R
10 r 5 m
=0.00785[25010+213

118-10

+0.615

1010-55]

kg/m

W=0.02466*s(d-s)

d=

d=60 s=4,

s=

=0.02466460-4=5

12

1m

2.4
2.3
3

(mm )

95352504

7.85

748517156.4

253207380

7.85

1987677933

296270520

7.85

2325723582

543532056

7.85

4266726640

317968688

7.85

2496054201

190625808

7.85

1496412593

464791020

7.85

3648609507

196293168

7.85

1540901369

#50~#54

288887500

7.85

2267766875

39300000

7.85

308505000

494076000

7.85

3878496600

198437880

7.85

1557737358

447390880

7.85

3512018408

#56~58

759000

7.85

5958150

34500000

7.85

270825000

122583360

7.85

962279376

127680000

7.85

1002288000

46013200

7.85

361203620

83363200

7.85

654401120

34400000

7.85

270040000

35857280

7.85

281479648

2500WL

38880000

7.85

305208000

2500WL

31748000

7.85

249221800

2500WL

35139720

7.85

275846802

162325200

7.85

1274252820

#52
#53~57

(g/cm )

13

(g/10 )

36926400

7.85

289872240

32632704

7.85

256166726.4

32582640

7.85

255773724

32529488

7.85

255356480.8

32022208

7.85

251374332.8

601895600

7.85

4724880460

35808000

7.85

281092800

44481600

7.85

349180560

37499520

7.85

294371232

32032000

7.85

251451200

31686944

7.85

248742510.4

48624000

7.85

381698400

188520400

7.85

1479885140

78915648

7.85

619487836.8

39169920

7.85

307483872

7272000

7.85

57085200

3793920

7.85

29782272

77446656

7.85

607956249.6

54817728

7.85

430319164.8

49971000

7.85

392272350

#55

121528360

7.85

953997626

#55

119125800

7.85

935137530

#55

38290080

7.85

300577128

#55

6963840

7.85

54666144

#55

1368000

7.85

10738800

52831200

7.85

414724920

4540800

7.85

35645280

14

1113792

7.85

8743267.2

123149936

7.85

966726997.6

758736

7.85

5956077.6

472912

7.85

3712359.2

10782516

7.85

84642750.6

67200

7.85

527520

7787200

7.85

61129520

6630960

7.85

52053036

100800

7.85

791280

5952000

7.85

46723200

18537600

7.85

145520160

6207360

7.85

48727776

13266000

7.85

104138100

14580000

7.85

114453000

7824000

7.85

61418400

6962802632

7.85

54658000661

54.66t
1000KW~5000KW 84t
N=840000/2830000N
28
2.2.3
2.1.1 2 20

Plj

=74160N 30000N

2
P
lj 30000N

Plj =

2 EI
4l 2 L

[13][14][15][16]

15

2.2.4
2.4:
2.4
LBm2
1.4~1.8
2.5~3.2

LB-

Flag 2942KW
1000KW~5000KW CAD 7.5m
10m7.510=75 14m 14m1414=196 2.6 2.5~3.2

2.2.5

GB707-65 14b, h=14mm b=140mm

d=60mm t=9.5mm
Q235

Q235
Q235 Q235-A
Q235-B Q235-C
Q235-D
[17][18][19]

2.3

B/50

16

550mm,

1 2
2.5

2.5

2.2.2 20mm
1 2
50cm150cm200cm
25005000
550mm ,

1
2

2.4

2.6

17

[20][21]

2.6

2.5

2.1.1 84t,
100t/8=12.5t
500mm V<60m/min, M4M5
17.2t12.5t[22]

2.6

2.6.1
5 X Y
Z

Y3000WL Z(1000BL )
5000

100

18

2.6.2

X
Y Z

'

X , X49 a,
'
X = X a
a=10400 2.6
2.6
Z

Y
--

#49

5177.4

1790
2510

#50

5229.8

5283.5

5151.8

5204.2

5127.0

#52

#53

#54

53383

5394.2

5451.3

5257.9

5312.7

5368.8

5425.7

5179.5

5233.1

5287.9

5343.9

5401.0

#56

#57
5628.9

#58

#59

5689.1

5749.7

5818.0

5663.5

5724.2

5740.9

--

5606.8

--

#55

5509.6

5569.0

1790

5484.0

5543.4

5459.2

5518.6

2510

#51

5603.3
5578.6

--

2.6.3
2.7
H H = L 2 COS L 2 = L - L1 L 3 2h
h L L3 L X
2.8

19

2.7

2.8

[23][24][25][26][27]

20

 Pro/Engineer

Pro/Engineer

3.1

3.2

Pro/ENGINEERUG CATIA

AUTOCAD
2004

AUTOCAD DXFDWG

DXFDWGSTL3DSWMF
Pro/Engineer 2D 3D

21

 Pro/Engineer

CATIAOBJ

PRTDXFDWGWRLXT PRTDRWCGMOBJ
WRLSTLDWGDXFEMNVDA
Pro/E 3D CADCAM
ProE
3D NC

Unigraphics UG MCAD
CAD/CAM/CAE/PDM

*.prt CGMVRML

STLIGESDXF/DWGCATIA Pro/E PRTCGM

STLIGESDXF/DWGCATIA
CATIA Dassault System CAD/CAE/CAM
CAD/CAE/CAM

DMU
CATIA :
747
13,000 CATIACATIA
CATIA

CATIA 777
CATIA CAD/CAE/CAM

3.3 Pro/Engineer
Pro/ENGINEER
Pro/ENGINEER Pro/ENGINEER Pro/MOLDESIGN
PRO/SHEETMETAL PRO/MECHANICA //
PRO/NC PRO/TOOLKIT
22

 Pro/Engineer

Pro/ENGINEER
Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire

Pro/E 450 6
ARX REX DCX FEX PDX
Pro/BATCH
Web
Pro/E CAD

Pro/ENGINEER Pro/ENGINEER PTC Windchill

[27][28][29]
3.3.1 Pro/Engineer
3.2
Pro/ENGINEER
Pro/Mechanica Pro/E
3.1 Pro/ENGINEER Windows

PRO/HELP
[30]
23

 Pro/Engineer

3.1Pro/ENGINEER

3.21-2-3-4-5- 26- 178-9-

6
5

2
3

1
3.2

3.3.2 Pro/Engineer

Pro/Engineer
CATIAOBJ
PRTDXFDWGWRLXT PRTDRWCGMOBJ
24

 Pro/Engineer

WRLSTLDWGDXFEMNVDA 3.3
Pro/Engineer
STL 3D Studio Max

b)
3.3 Pro/Engineer

3.2.3 AUTOCAD

Pro/Engineer
AUTOCAD2005 AUTOCAD
AUTOCAD

3.4

25

 Pro/Engineer

3.4

2942KW

AUTOCAD

3.4

3.5, b) a)

3.5

AUTOCAD
CAD

AUTOCAD surftab1 6

surftab1 100

3.6 3.5

26

 Pro/Engineer

3.6 AUTOCAD

3-6
DXFDWG DXFDWGSTL

3DSWMF DXF 3D Studio Max

3D MAX 3D Studio Max

Pro/Engineer

AUTOCAD

27

4.1
CADCAE(Computer Aided DesignEngineering)
CAD
CADCAE ,
,
,
20 70 ,
CAE
, CAE
CAE (
)
CAE
CADCAE
CAE 20 60 70
CAE

20
--

20 80 CAD
CAE
CAE

1
2
3
4 CAD
5
28

4.2
ANSYS

NSTRANCOSMOSMARCMOLDFLOW

CAD

Pro/ENGINEERUG CATIA

IGESDXF STEP

CAD

ANSYS

CAE

ANSYS

COSMOS GEOSTAR STAR

DSTARHSTARASTAR
CAD Pro/ENGINEERSolidEdge

Eureka GoldMicroStationMechanic Desktop CAD

COSMOS

29

Marc

MOLDFLOW ,
MOLDFLOW
,,
,
[31][32][33][34]

4.3 Pro/MECHANICA

Pro/MECHANICA

Pro/MECHANICA
CAD Pro/MECHANICA
PTC CAD
Pro/MECHANICA CAD

Pro/MECHANICA 1990

Pro/ENGINEER Pro/MECHANICA

Pro/MECHANICA
Pro/ENGINEER

Pro/MECHANICA PTC

30

Pro/MECHANICA

Pro/MECHANICA

CAD PTC ATB

Pro/MECHANICA

Pro/ENGINEER Pro/ENGINEER
Pro/ENGINEER

Pro/MECHANICA

Pro/MECHANICA
PRO/ENGINEER PRO/ENGINEER
Pro/M
PRO/E Pro/M Mechanica

FEM Mechanica Pro/MECHANICA P-code

FEM Pro/MECHANICA H-code
NASTRANANSYS FEM
FEM
Pro/MECHANICA
[35][36]

31

4.4 Pro/MECHANICA
4.4.1 Pro/MECHANICA

Standard
(Sensitivity),

Optimization,

Pro/MECHANICA Structure

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
Pro/mechanica

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
32

4.1

4.1 pro/mechanica

pro/mechanica

4.4.2

1
3-1
Auto GEM

33

2)
Q235
Q235

Q235 4.1
4.1

Q235

Kg/m3

7. 85e 3

E, GPa

2.06

0. 3

N/mm2

7.938e10

161MPa

N=840000/2830000N 28

4
(1) AnalysesMechanica Analyses/Studies Analyses and
Design Studies
Analyses and

Design StudiesInfoStatus:
...Checking the model before creating elements...These checks take into
account the fact that AutoGEM will automatically create elements
Pro/MECHANICA

(2) AnalysResultsStressvon Mises

4.2

34

4.2

1.012E+01161MPa

d,r d 40mmr 20mm

20~60mm(10~30)mm
,;
: (2060) mm,(1030)mm, 2
2

4.3a

35

4.3a

4.3b
4.3a 4.3b von mises

d
r

von mises r von mises

4.4
,(10mm 20mm

20mm 30mm ), 20mm , 10mm von

mises 10~90MPa
36

4.4

7
,
Pro /Mechanica ,
,
,,
,,

:
:max 161MPa,
: r
r 10~30mm von mises 10~90Mpa
r=20mm 90
20mm r = 20mm
4.5

37

4.5

4.4.3
1)
AnalysesMechanica
Analyses/StudiesAnalyses and Design Studies

Analyses and Design Studies

InfoStatus:
... An error has occurred while requesting an additional 204.997 megabytes
of memory from the operating system. To correct this problem, you may need to
increase the amount of swap space on your system.

You may also need to increase

the memory usage limits that are set for your system..

pro/mechanica

AutoGEM

1/10 Pro/Mechanica
38

AutoGEM
4.6a
4.6b

4.6 a)

AutoGEM Summary
Entities Created:
Beam:
0
Tri:
0
Quad:
0
Tetra:
8218
Wedge:
0
Brick:
0`

Edge:
Face:
Face-Face Link:
Edge-Face Link:

4.6

13386
18776
0
0

b)
39

AutoGEM Summary
Entities Created:
Beam:
Tri:
Quad:
Tetra:
Wedge:
Brick:

0
82
42
0
0
0

Edge:
Face:
Face-Face Link:
Edge-Face Link:

236
124
0
0

4.6a 8218
4.6b 42
82

2
(1) Pro/ENGINEER 3.2
(2) Pro/ENGINEER ApplicationsMechanica
ContinuePro/MECHANICA MECHANICA
Structure
(3)(STEEL)
y y

3
1 4.7

40

4.7

Beam:
Tri:
Quad:
Tetra:
Wedge:
Brick:

AutoGEM Summary
Entities Created:
0
Edge:
6692
1829
Face:
4526
1114
Face-Face Link:
0
653
Edge-Face Link:
58
0
0

Quad 1114Tri 1829Face: 4526 Edge: 6692

196MPa190MPa187MPa

4.8a

4.8b

4.8c

4)

41

1
2
3

4
4.9

4.9

4.9
4.10
26.9Mpa 161MPa

[37][38][39][40]

42

4.10

PRO/E PRO/M

43

5.1

,,

,
,
5.1.1
,
,: (C < 0. 3 %) ;
,;,
;()
,,
,,
,
,( 0122 %) ,
,,,
,,
Cr ,Ni ,Mo Cu
,
,

5.1.2
,,
, 100
150 ,, 600 ,
,,
44

, 200
,,
,
,() ,

5.2

(1) ,
,
,,( al , a
, l )
(2) ,
(3)
(4) ,;
;; , ;
, (3mm )
(5) ,

(6) , , 4
10mm( 3mm) ;,
(7) ,
(8) ,, 1/ 10
(9) ,

(10)

5.3
,
5.1 1
,,

45

(1)
,,
,
3mm ,
20mm V ( 60) , 40mm X ,
40mm U U ,
s ,
,
(2) T
,,(
) ,

(3)
T
(4)
,[41]

46

5.1

5.4
(1)
,:

47

FN
F
= N (1)
'
(al)
A
F
F
' = Q = Q (2)
A (al)
M y
' = b' (3)
I

' =

, FN , FQ ,Mb

Mt ,,
:

= Mt / 2Aua

( 4 )

,Au ,a
a l = L ,( a) ,
l = L - 2a ,L ,
:
2

' = ' + 1.8 '

( 5 )

(5) ISO
:

' =

' + ' 2 + 4 ' 2

( 6 )

' ' ' a ' a

' a ' a
(2)
,
,
,

= v1v 2 a =

VV2 S
SN

48

= V1V2 a =

VV2 a
SN

SN = SC , S = 1. 5 ,C
, C = 1. 3 ,C = 1. 08 ,C = 0. 93 ,C = 0. 82 ;s
; v 2
v2 :v2 = 0. 8 1. 0

()

v2 = 0. 5 ()
A ,
3 :A = 170 M Pa ( ) 120 M Pa () ;
5 :A = 240 M Pa ( ) 180 M Pa ()
v 5-2

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.8

0.8

30%~40%, 30%~50%

,,,
,

49

3DS MAX
3DS MAX
3DS MAX

6.1

Maya3d maxSoftimageLightwave

Maya AliasWavefront
3D
Maya Maya
API
3D Maya
Maya
MAYA
,, MAX MAYA
. MEL .
MAYA , MAYA , MEL
MAYA ,,,.
Maya

Maya

Softimage XSI Avid

Softimage
3ds max6 Mental Ray

50

Maya 3ds max 3ds max6

Maya
Lightwave

Lightwave PCMACSGI

6.2 3D Studio MAX

3D Studio MAX

MAX
MAX

MAX
3ds max Max
3ds max

3DS MAX ,

NURBS
,
, 3 DS MAX

, 3DS MAX

3DS MAX 6

1024 768

51

CPU 733MHZ
128MBYte

12801024
CPU1.8GHZ Intel Xeon AMD Athlon
256MByte
3DS MAX8 [42][43]

6.3

PRO/E
*STL 3ds max 3ds max6
3ds max6 3ds max8

AUTOCAD CAD

3ds max

Unigraphics PRTCGMSTL
DXF/DWG Pro/Engineer 3ds max,

6-1

52

DXFDWGWRL
WRLSTLDWGDXF

STLDXFDWG

DXFDWGSTL3DS

DXFDWG

DXFDWG

AUTOCAD

3dsdxfstl
3D Studio Max

3dsdxfstl

objdxf

Pro/Engineer

MultiGen-Creator

stldxfdwg

PRTCGMSTLIGES
DXF/DWG
PRTCATIAWRL
DXFDWG

Unigraphics

VRMLSTLDXF/DWG
STLIGESDXF/DWG

DXFDWG

DXFDWGSTL

6-1

6.4
6.4.1 AUTOCAD

3ds max
Autodesk AUTOCAD
3ds max
AUTOCAD
6.2 633
*DWG max 6.4
max

53

a)

b)

6.2 3D Studio Max

a)

6.3

b)

6.4

3d max

6.4.2

54

Faces
Triangles

8218
42 82

NURBS 3ds
max
5.1
3ds max

3ds max6 AEC

Extended
Foliage()WallRailing()

3ds max

PHOTOSHOP3ds max6

6.4.3

3DS MAX
3DS M A X ,
55

SurfaceTools NURBS ,
3DS MAX ,,
Text Bevel(), Bevel Value
, Edit Mesh ,
,
Surface Tools()
Surface NURBS ,
,
NURBS 3DSMAX
3DS MAX
MAX

,,,
6.5 NURBS

6.5

56

6.6

6.6

3DS Max ,
, 3DS Max ,,
,, 3DS Max ,
3DS Max
,, Reset ,
,,
, 3DS Max
,,,
,
3DS Max ,,
,, 3DS Max
,,
,,

1,,
,
,,

2
,,,
57

,,

3
,,,
,,,
,,

6-6

6.7[44][45[46][47]

6.7

58

6.4.5

3DS MAX

720 1800

3DS MAX

24 FPS
NTSC 30 NTSC
30 fps 60

PAL 25
3DS MAX
1

2
3
4
5

6
7

59

16.3.4
2 Top

3//Dummy()
4
5 Path Parameters() Add Path

6
7
8

8
1234 3
3 [48][49]

6.5
Windows Movie Maker Windows XP Windows Me

Windows Movie Maker

60

Windows Movie Maker

Ctrl + U

Windows
Movie Maker

1Windows Movie Maker

Windows Movie Maker 6.8

6.8

windows movie maker

Windows Movie Maker

61

||

|
.
Windows Movie Maker 5

/
MP3WAVAIF

MSWMM . MSWMM
.MSWMM
WMM

....MSWMM
\M

.WMV [50]

3DS MAX
3DS MAX
Windows Windows Movie Maker

62

PRO/ENGINEER
PRO/MECHANICA ANSYS

AUTOCAD PRO/ENGINEER
C++3DS MAX8

AUTOCAD Creator
6.1

63

64

[1] ..2004.3.
[2] ..20042.
[3] . .; 1001-5388; vol.20; no.6.
[4] ; . . 1992,000(002).
[5] ..2003.443.
[6] . 2001.231.
[7] ..2005.3.
[8] ..20062.
[9] ..19921.
[10] ..2001.
[11] ..
[12] ..1989.5.
[13] ..20041.
[14] . BP .2003.44
2.
[15] .10000HP . 2004.
[16] ..
[17] Oetter, Rolf; Barry, Christopher D; Duffty, Bryan; welter, Joel. Blocks construction of small ships
and boats through use of developable panels. Journal of ship production v18 n 2May 2002.P65-72.
[18] , , . . 20016.
[19] . . 20014.
[20] Sang-Hoon Shin; Ick-Hung Choe; Jong-Hwan Lee; Doehyun Kim; Jin-Chil Kwon. A Study on
Optimum Size of Big Bracket in Cargo Tanks of Crude Oil Carrier.
[21] T.I.Khabakhpasheva. Impact of a surfacewave on an elastic hull. Journal of Fluid Dynamics,Volume
41, Number 3 / May, 2006.
[22] 1983.11.
[23] 1978.3.
[24] ..2002.8.
[25] 1998.3
[26] () ,. 1984.3
[27] 2005.10.
[28] . Pro/Engineer .2005.9.
65

[29] Soon-Hung Han, Dongkon Lee.Integration of ship design software modules utilizing the
superapplication concept[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Volume1, Number
5/October,1996.
[30] .Pro/Engineer Ansys .2005.271.
[31] .ANSYS 2004.4
[32] .Ansys .2003.1.
[33] Saeed Moaveni. Finite Element Analysis .Publishing House of El ectronics Insustry, 2005.8.
[34] Mauro Valorani1 , Daniele Peri2 , Emilio F. Campana. Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Design
Optimal Ship Hulls. Ptimization and Engineering, Volume 4, Number 4/December, 2003.
[35] Clark J, Lamb T. Build Strategy Development[J]. Journal of Ship Production, 1996,12.
[36] Anthony M.Bloch.Stability analysis of a rotating flexible system[J].An International Survey Journal
on Applying Mathematics and Mathematical Applications,Volume 15,Number3/June,1989.
[37] K. H. Low and S. H. Lim.Propulsion shaft alignment method and analysis for surface crafts.
Advances in Engineering Software Volume 35, Issue 1 , January 2004, Pages 45-58.
[38] .Pro /Mechanica[J].
2006.610.
[39] ..1995.2.
[40] 2007.3
[41] 1995.8
[42] .3DS MAX6 .2004.7.
[43] ..2003.8.
[44] . Creator .2005.3.
[45] . Creator/Vega 2005.324.
[46] .Vega .2005.12.
[47] Leslie Keedy, K. EspenlaubG. Menger. Software Reuse: Advances in Software Reusability 6th
International Conference, ICSR-6, Vienna, Austria, June 27-29, 2000.
[48] Huval, C. J.; Hewlett, J. C.; McCollum, R. A. Ship Navigation Simulation Study, Southwest Pass
Entrance, MississippiRiver~Technical rept. Ship Navigation Simulation Study, Southwest Pass
Entrance, MississippiRiver~Technical rept 1996.
[49] CHU Yan-jun. KANG Feng-ju. TANG Kai. SONG Zhi-ming. Research and Development of Visual
Simulation System in DIS Environment. Computer Simulation. 200401.
[50] 3ds max 8 2007.1.

66

67

[1]. 20081
[2]. pro/mechanica 20082

68

(2)
1. .. pro/mechanic 2008
pro/mechanic

2. ... Pro/Mechanic -2008,""(2)

Pro/Mechanic,.,,,
.,,,.

http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis_D068011.aspx
(wfjskjdx)1d1b2d69-ee2d-40cc-b283-9e3101065545
20101117