Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Composites are made by combining of two or more different materials, which are having different characteristics. Composites
materials are widely used today in various applications. Pultrusion process is used to manufacture composite material, in these
process different types of roving of glass, carbon, aramid fibres are used to make different pultruded material as per their
application. Pultruded product which are various types of shape like C-channel, I-beam, square pipe, circular pipe etc, Today
pultruded products are used in various applications like bridges, FRP ladders, communication tower, cooling tower, etcThere
are several products of pultrusion products used in different application, but we have to analyze different products uses for a
special application in terms of strength.
Keywords: Composite, Pultrusion, Glass Fiber, FRP
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I. INTRODUCTION
Pultrusion is one of the oldest processes for the manufacture of long fibre reinforced thermosetting plastics, and it is also the
oldest continuous processing technique.
A. The Pultrusion Process:
The process known as pultrusion is an efficient method of manufacturing specified lengths of FRP composites. The process
requires very little labor and utilizes almost 100% of the raw material required. The first pultrusion machines were invented in
the 1950s as an efficient method of manufacturing fishing and kite rods, tool handles, sign posts, tent poles, and other solid rod
blanks. (Starr & Ketel, 2000) Today pultrusion is the preferred method for manufacturing everyday household items; ladders and
window sills, to structural components; wide-flanged beams, box columns, and floor grates. Figure1. illustrates the pultrusion
process.
223
Thickness(mm)
Width(mm)
Maximum load(kN)
Tensile strength(Mpa)
Modulus(Gpa)
1
2
3
4
5
Mean
S.D.
C.V.%
6.33
6.37
6.25
6.26
6.34
6.31
0.05244
0.831069
12.11
12.09
13.64
12.36
11.6
12.36
0.766714
6.203186
33.092
26.023
32.589
25.903
28.139
29.1492
3.489604
11.97153
431.695
337.906
382.27
334.772
382.608
373.8502
39.72626
10.62625
27.357
25.673
27.071
26.915
25.281
26.4594
0.92119
3.481522
224
Table - 2
C-Channel Tensile Strength Testing Results
Table C-Channel Tensile strength testing results
C-Channel
Thickness(mm)
Width(mm)
Maximum load(kN)
Tensile strength(Mpa)
Modulus(Gpa)
6.35
11.84
26.788
356.293
28.47
6.27
13.22
29.585
356.918
24.95
6.21
14.04
32.303
370.501
26.659
6.3
12.71
30.769
384.262
27.226
6.31
13.48
33.17
389.967
25.406
Mean
6.288
13.058
30.523
371.5882
26.5422
S.D.
0.052154
0.832658
2.503278
15.40086
1.416306
C.V.%
0.829415
6.376615
8.201283
4.144603
5.336053
From the results we can conclude that, I-Beam having a better tensile strength than C-Channel.
B. Compression Test:
Thickness(mm)
Width(mm)
Maximum load(kN)
Compressive strength(Mpa)
Modulus(Gpa)
6.29
12.28
9.27
120.03
11.44
6.22
12.4
9.1
118.04
13.02
6.29
13.19
9.66
116.47
13.26
6.32
13.65
11
127.46
13.1
6.26
13.38
10.31
123.04
14.13
Mean
6.276
12.98
9.868
121.008
12.99
S.D.
0.037815
0.608153
0.785411
4.362232
0.973139
C.V.%
0.602539
4.685308
7.959168
3.604912
7.491449
225
Table 4
I-Beam Compressive Strength Testing Results
Table I-Beam Compressive strength testing results
I-Beam
Thickness(mm)
Width(mm)
Maximum load(kN)
Compressive strength(Mpa)
Modulus(Gpa)
6.11
13.38
12.92
158.09
13.643
6.09
13.36
12.43
152.74
14.073
6.14
13.44
12.77
154.78
14.767
6.15
13.48
10.13
122.23
13.449
6.14
13.41
11.23
136.38
14.268
Mean
6.126
13.414
11.896
144.8442
14.04
S.D.
0.0251
0.047749
1.189529
15.16324
0.521654
C.V.%
0.409726
0.355966
9.999406
10.46866
3.715485
From the results we can conclude that, I-Beam having a better compressive strength than C-Channel.
C. Flexural Test:
Method ASTM D790
Specimen size- 6.25*12.8*125 mm
Flexural strength measured when 5% deflection on the material and test will be stopped
Table - 5
I-Beam Flexural Strength Testing Results
Table I-Beam Flexural strength testing results
I-Beam
Thickness (mm)
Width(mm)
Maximum load(kN)
Flexure strength(Mpa)
Modulus(Gpa)
6.25
13.11
100
684.05
200.36
12.46
6.25
12.49
100
568.3
174.72
12.86
6.27
12.35
100
577.16
178.31
12.49
6.22
12.97
100
592.15
177.01
12.77
6.23
13.14
100
590
173.53
12.43
Mean
6.244
12.812
602.332
180.786
12.602
S.D.
0.019494
0.366906
46.7049
11.10153
0.198167
C.V.%
0.312197
2.863768
7.754012
6.140704
1.572501
226
Table 6
C-Channel Flexural Strength Testing Results
Table C-Channel Flexural strength testing results
CChannel
Thickness (mm)
Width(mm)
Maximum load(kN)
Flexure strength(Mpa)
Modulus(Gpa)
6.27
12.89
100
534.24
158.14
12.03
6.23
12.93
100
585.94
175.13
12.69
6.26
12.71
100
585.23
176.25
12.33
6.26
12.07
100
581.63
184.45
12.21
6.24
13.19
100
564.52
164.88
12.04
Mean
6.252
12.758
570.312
171.77
12.26
S.D.
0.016432
0.421094
21.96369
10.31251
0.270924
C.V.%
0.262823
3.300626
3.851171
6.003673
2.209823
From the results we can conclude that, C-Channel having a less Flexural strength than I-beam.
IV. CONCLUSION
Throughout these Pultrusion products, we are testing a mechanical properties of pultruded products, and from testing of these
various properties we obtain a different results. From these results we can conclude following things:
1) From the results we can conclude that, I-Beam having a better tensile strength than C-Channel.
2) In case of compressive strength, I-Beam having a better compressive strength than C-Channel.
3) And another mechanical property is flexural strength that is C-Channel having a less Flexural strength than I-beam.
4) In a various application of Pultrusion product we can used proper pultruded product like; i-beam. C-channel, square
pipe, circular pipe etc., in a particular form or place like; FRP ladder, pultruded bridge, hand rails etc
REFERENCES
Websites
[1] www.textilelearner.blogspot.com/glassfibre
[2] www.nptel.com/fibreglass
[3] www.afpfiberglass.com/pultrusions
[4] www.slideshare.net/glasssfibre
[5] www.composites.owenscorning.com
[6] www.creativepultrusions.com
[7] www.pultrex.com
[8] www.instron.com
Research Paper
[9] Development of pultrusion system of carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites, Y.tanaka, N.shikamoto, A.ohtani
[10] Mechanical properties of thermoplastic pultrusion products with braiding technique Y.Takai, A.Nakai,
[11] Mechanical Property of Glass Fiber Reinforcement Epoxy Composites,
Patil Deogonda, Vijaykumar N Chalwa (international journal of scientific engineering and research)
[12] Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Glass-Polyester Composites Formed by Resin Transfer Moulding and Hand Lay-Up Technique M. Davallo, H.
Pasdar (international journal of chemtech research) Vol.1, No.3 , pp 470-475, July-Sept 2009
227