Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiff,
v.
RONALD L. BLACKBURN,
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
Summary
1.
the alleged claims therein, to which no response is required. To the extent a response is deemed
necessary, Defendant Treaty denies all such allegations as they apply to it.
II.
Defendant Treaty does not contest the jurisdiction of this Court, as alleged in
3.
Treaty denies that venue is proper and further denies that the transactions, acts, practices, and
course of business described in the Complaint occurred within the jurisdiction of the Eastern
District of Texas.
III.
Parties
4.
Defendant Treaty admits that it is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of
business in New Orleans, Louisiana but denies all of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 6 of
the Complaint.
5.
the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 7 of the Complaint but, out of an abundance of caution,
denies all allegations therein.
6.
Defendant Treaty admits that Andrew V. Reid was its CEO and Chairman of the
Board from or about April 2010 until he resigned from the company and its Board of Directors
on July 28, 2014. Defendant Treaty lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint but, out of an
abundance of caution, denies all allegations therein.
7.
8.
the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 10 of the Complaint but, out of an abundance of caution,
denies all allegations therein.
9.
Defendant Treaty admits that Lee C. Schlesinger was its Chief Investment Officer
2
from or about November 2011 until his resignation in September 2013. Defendant Treaty lacks
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations
in Paragraph 11 of the Complaint but, out of an abundance of caution, denies all allegations
therein.
10.
the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 12 of the Complaint but, out of an abundance of caution,
denies all allegations therein.
IV.
Facts
11.
the truth of the allegations in Paragraphs 13 83 of the Complaint but, out of an abundance of
caution, generally denies all allegations therein.
V.
To the extent not otherwise denied, Defendant Treaty denies any and all other
Venue in this case is improper because none of the acts alleged in this Complaint
took place in the Eastern District of Texas. Rather, venue would be proper in the Eastern District
of Louisiana where Defendant Treatys principal place of business is located, where a significant
3
number of shareholders are located, where most of the acts alleged in the Complaint occurred,
and where nearly all the witnesses anticipated in this matter are located.
2.
Plaintiffs Complaint, and each of the purported claims against Defendant Treaty,
At all times, Defendant Treaty acted in good faith, with good cause, and without
willful, malicious, egregious, or intent to violate any laws or to harm anyone in any manner.
4.
Defendant Treaty is not liable for Plaintiffs claims, in whole or in part, because it
relied in good faith upon the professional judgments of legal professionals at the time of the
alleged acts as to matters which it reasonably believed to be within such persons professional or
expert competence.
5.
The claims alleged in Plaintiffs Complaint are barred, in whole or in part, by the
Plaintiffs claims for injunctive relief are barred because there has been no
violation of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, and because there is no reasonable
likelihood that any violation will be repeated. Plaintiffs injunctive relief claim is further barred
because the adverse effects of an injunction far outweigh any benefit from an injunction.
7.
Plaintiffs claim for penalties is barred because any alleged violation was isolated
and/or unintentional.
8.
Defendant Treaty is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that as a
result of Plaintiffs acts, conduct and omissions, Plaintiff waived its right to assert each and
every purported cause of action contained in the Complaint, in whole or in part.
4
9.
All of the allegations in Plaintiffs Complaint were the acts of persons for whom
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On this 13th day of April, 2015, the undersigned hereby certifies that the
foregoing has been served via electronic transmission upon all counsel of record:
Jennifer D. Brandt
Counsel for Plaintiff SEC
Burnett Plaza, Suite 1900
801 Cherry Street, Unit #18
Fort Worth, Texas 76102-6882
brandtj@sec.gov
Jeffrey J. Ansley
Counsel for Defendant Schlesinger
Bell Nunnally & Martin, LLP
1400 One McKinney Plaza
3232 McKinney Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75204-2429
jansley@bellnunnally.com
Robert M. Corn
Counsel for Defendant Whitley
The Lyric Center
440 Louisiana Street, Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77002-1636
rcorn@corn-law.com
Henry L. Klein
Counsel for Defendants Blackburn,
Reid, Gwyn & Mulshine
844 Baronne Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
henry@hlklawoffice.com
_________________________________