You are on page 1of 15

INTRODUCTION

First off, I am happy to apply what we have learned in our subject,


International Trade Law, to an important topic. The circumstances surrounding the
importation of flour of the Philippines from Turkey have an enormous consequence
to almost every Filipino household. I will tackle the issue of anti-dumping with
regard the current situation of the trade between Turkey and the Philippines. I will
determine whether the imposition of additional duty in the importation of Turkish
flour is the best approach, which the Philippine government could have adopted.
To quote the late Abraham Lincoln These men ask for just the same thing,
fairness, and fairness only. This, so far as in my power, they, and all others, shall
have. 1 Fairness is a value, which is protected by the Constitution. In particular,
Article II section 7 which states The State shall pursue an independent foreign
policy. In its relations with other states, the paramount consideration shall be
national sovereignty, territorial integrity, national interest, and the right to selfdetermination. 2 as well as Article XII section 13 which states that The State shall
pursue a trade policy that serves the general welfare and utilizes all forms and
arrangements of exchange on the basis of equality and reciprocity 3 clearly show
that the Philippines recognizes the importance of foreign relations in the
development of the economy. Contrary to what is embedded in the Constitution,
recent developments in the field of the Flour industry have shown that the Philippine
government has taken certain actions which impede the free flowing nature of
foreign trade. In an order, Agriculture Secretary Proceso Alcala said the antidumping duty, which would be on top of the seven percent tariff imposed on Turkish
flour, would amount to the following, 35 percent on hard flour for bread; 39.26
percent on biscuit flour; and 35.21 percent on soft flour for pastries and cookies 4 .
Alcala said that After a thorough examination of the evidence, data and other
comment/positions by interested parties, the preliminary investigation has
established the existence of a threat of material injury to the local industry caused by
the importation of alleged dumped wheat flour from Turkey. 5
The action of the imposition of additional duties serves as a counter measure
for anti-dumping. However, it would be prudent to examine the imposition of
additional duties to determine if such imposition will be for the greater good of the
Philippines.
Overview of International Trade and Anti-dumping in the Philippine setting
In ever evolving world of international commerce, it is but an inevitable facet
1 Brainyquotes, available at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/fairness.html (last accessed October
9, 2014).
2 PHIL. CONST. art. II 7
3 PHIL. CONST. art. XII 13
4 Orti, Despuez, Philippines Slaps Anti Dumping Duty on Turkish Flour, Interaksyon.com, April 23, 2014,
available at http://www.interaksyon.com/business/85321/philippines-slaps-anti-dumping-duty-on-turkish-flour
(last accessed October 9, 2014).
5Id.

of life that countries rely no longer on their own resources and that they depend on
the resources of their neighbors. Gone are the days wherein close door polices are
adopted by nations in order to survive. In this day and age, in order to stay afloat,
most third world countries such as the Philippines are dependent on their
neighboring countries. Whether it be importing raw materials, exporting products or
enticing foreign investors, one thing is for sure, there is an interdependence of
countries in order to be economically stable. International commerce entails a
necessary interaction between nations; trade. Following the havoc caused by World
War II, delegates from Allied nations gathered for a conference to establish rules for
commercial and financial relations among the worlds major industrial states. This is
known as the Bretton Woods Conference. One major goal was to avoid the
recurrence of the closed markets and economic warfare that characterized the
previous decades. This led to the establishment of the International Monetary Fund,
the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (known as the World
Bank). This was simply the beginning of international trade. Eventually, a
multilateral agreement, the General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs (GATT),
regulating international trade was signed in 1947. This multilateral agreement would
be updated in 1994 and would serve as the foundation of trade policies which the
contracting parties will follow in order to promote international trade.

The definition of international trade is The exchange of goods or services


along international borders. This type of trade allows for a greater competition and
more competitive pricing in the market . The competition results in more affordable
products for the consumer. The exchange of goods also affects the economy of the
world as dictated by supply and demand , making goods and services obtainable
which may not otherwise be available to consumers globally. 6 . Based on this
definition, it is evident that international trade is a tool, which can be used to
alleviate the effects of poverty in certain countries as well as promote competition in
order for domestic industries to develop and become more efficient.
International trade is a tool that may eradicate poverty however, certain
countries have abused this tool and profited from taking advantage of countries that
are not that developed. In retaliation to this injustice that occurs in the real world,
the World Trade Organization (WTO) has implemented certain safeguards to
neutralize unfair trade. One of the safeguards against unfair trade implemented by
WTO can be found in Article VI of the GATT which provides for Anti-dumping and
Countervailing Duties. Paragraph one of Article VI of the GATT provides that The
contracting parties recognize that dumping, by which products of one country are
introduced into the commerce of another country at less than the normal value of the
products, is to be condemned if it causes or threatens material injury to an
established industry in the territory of a contracting party or materially retards the
establishment of a domestic industry It is apparent from the aforementioned
provision that the WTO condemns any form of dumping which causes material injury
to the domestic industry of the country of export.
6 Business Dictionary, available at http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/international-trade.html (last
accessed October 9, 2014).

The Philippines has recognized the importance of placing certain safeguards


in the realm of international trade. Pursuant to Article VI of the GATT, detailed
guidelines have been recommended under the specific agreements that have also
been incorporated in the national legislation of the member countries of the WTO.
Philippine laws such as Republic Act No. 7843 (the Anti-Dumping Law of the
Philippines) and Republic Act No. 8752 (The Anti-dumping Act of 1999) have been
enacted in order to align with the general principles provided by the GATT to combat
against unfair trade.
According to the Philippine Tariff Commission, Dumping occurs when
foreign producers sell their products to an importer in the domestic market at prices
lower than in their own national markets, or at prices below cost of production, the
sale or importation of which injures or threatens to injure a domestic industry
producing like or comparable products or retards the establishment of a potential
industry. It is a form of price discrimination between two national markets. 7 To
occurrence of dumping can be broken down to four simple elements. The first
element of dumping is that there must be like products. There must be a product
produced by the domestic industry which is identical or alike in all respects to the
article under consideration, or in the absence of such a product, another product
which, although not alike in all respects, has characteristics closely resembling those
of the product under consideration. The second element is that there must be a price
difference in price. There must be a discrepancy in the normal value (the price
prevailing in the exporting country) which exceeds the export price (selling price to
an importer in the Philippines).
The third element is that there must be injury. The
word injury as provided by the GATT must be construed to mean material injury to
a domestic industry, threat of material injury or material retardation of the
establishment of a domestic industry. Injury test must be based on positive evidence
and shall involve an objective examination of both (a) the volume of the dumped
imports and the effect of dumped imports on prices in the domestic market for like
product, and (b) the consequent impact of these imports on the domestic producers
of such products. The last element is that there must be a Causal Link. The casual
link refers to a finding that the material injury suffered by the domestic industry is
the direct result of the importation of the dumped product.
It must be clear that the
injury suffered is directly attributable to the alleged dumping.
Furthermore, the local laws provided that a dumping protest may cover any
specific kind or class of a foreign product which is being imported, sold or is likely
to be sold, into the Philippines at a price less than its normal value, the importation
or sale of which might injure, or retard the establishment of, or is likely to injure an
industry producing like products in the Philippines. 8 With that being said, it is
evident that local laws seek to protect the local industry from foreign entities which
may cause certain injuries to the local industry.

7 Anti-Dumping Investigation, Tariff Commission of the Philippines, available at


http://www.tariffcommission.gov.ph/anti-dum2.html (last accessed October 9, 2014).
8 Id.

However, the GATT does not give the contracting parties absolute autonomy
with regard to restricting foreign trade. The twin principles of Most Favored Nation
and National Treatment serve as safeguards in order to ensure that no foreign
country will be subject to discrimination. The notion of non-discrimination is a
principle which the Philippines adheres to. Therefore, it is safe to say that the local
laws in relation to anti-dumping should not be used as a tool to discriminate against
foreign countries. It would be of value to look at the rationale behind the anti
dumping law. According to the Philippine Tariff Commission, there are three basic
reasons to justify the anti-dumping law 9 . The first is to transform the domestic antidumping law into a more workable and simple piece of legislation providing the
safety nets against the inflow of cheap dumped imports. The second rationale is to
strengthen the rules governing the investigation of anti-dumping cases. Finally, the
third rationale is to align the domestic law with the WTO Agreement on AntiDumping Practices. Furthermore, the landmark case of Taada vs. Angara, the
Supreme Court provided that Constitution did not intend to pursue an isolationist
policy. It did not shut out foreign investments, goods and services in the
development of the Philippine economy. While the Constitution does not encourage
the unlimited entry of foreign goods, services and investments into the country, it
does not prohibit them either. In fact, it allows an exchange on the basis of equality
and reciprocity, frowning only on foreign competition that is unfair. 10

Importation of Flour from Turkey


In a report made by RICARDO M. PINCA, Executive Director of The
Philippine Association of Flour Millers (PAFMIL) 11 , he gave the background of the
Turkish Flour industry. As of 2012-2013, Turkey is the worlds biggest exporter of
wheat flour at 2,500,000 MT. Turkeys biggest export market is Iraq with 45% of
their total export volume in 2011 and maintained in 2012. Turkeys second biggest
export market is Indonesia with 25% share in 2011 but reduced to 10.5% of their
total export volume in 2012 due to 20% safeguard duty imposed by Indonesia.
However, Turkey diverted their export for Indonesia to Philippines. Philippines
ranked third with 6% share of their total export in 2011 but now increased to 9% in
2012. While Turkey invokes trade liberalization in flour exports, Turkey also
prevents flour imports in their country by imposing a tariff wall.
Pinca illustrated that 39% of Turkish Flour exports to the South East Asian
region during the years of 2007-2012 were exported to the Philippines. There was a
drastic change in the importation of flour during 2011 and 2012. There was increase
of 72,341 in metric tons in the one-year period mainly because of the safeguard duty
imposed by Indonesia. Another important figure to take note of is the difference
between the export price compared to the normal value of the flour being exported
by turkey. The table below will illustrate this discrepancy:
9 Id.
10 Taada vs. Angara, G.R. No. 118295. May 2, 1997.
11 See Annex A
4

2010
2011
2012
2013 (July)

Normal Value

Export Price

$600
$600
$470
$512

$276
$388
$349
$377

Discount given to
the Philippines.
54%
35.3%
25.7%
26.4%

As illustrated by the table and in line with the definition of dumping 12


provided by the Philippine Tariff Commission as well as Article 2.1 13 of the AntiDumping Agreement it can be deduced that there is prima facie case of dumping
being done by Turkey.
There is no question as to the first element. It is clear that the flour being
exported by Turkey is a like product as compared to the flour being produced by
the domestic industry.
With regard to the second element, the table above illustrates that there
is a significant difference between the export price and normal value. The
figures show that 54%,35.3%,25.7% and 26.4% for 2010,2011,2012 and July
of 2013 (respectively) are not mere de minims differences. To determine
whether dumping exists, the export price is compared with the normal value.
Article 2.4 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement provides in relevant part A fair
comparision shall be made between the export price and the normal value.
This comparison shall be made at the same level of trade, normally ex-factory
level, and in respect of sales made at nearly as possible the same time.
With regard to the third and fourth element, Pinca claims the increasing
importation of flour import has a negative impact in society. It has a negative impact
to GDP growth because domestic production is substituted by imported goods.
Furthermore, continuous substitution will erode domestic company competitiveness
resulting to significant transfers of wealth and loss of capital. Also, there is a high
possibility of businesses closing down for the local industries contributing to a
higher unemployment rate. Another reason is that Turkish Flour Millers sell or
export their products to an importer in the domestic market at prices lower than our
own national markets, or at prices below cost of production, the sale or importation
of which injures or threatens to injure domestic industry. Finally, Pinca mentioned
that he believes although in a free-market economy and unhindered competition is
beneficial to consumers, the case of the imported Turkish Flour is not granting the
local industry a competitive level playing field, due to their subsidy system.
12 Dumping occurs when foreign producers sell their products to an importer in the domestic market at prices
lower than in their own national markets, or at prices below cost of production, the sale or importation of which
injures or threatens to injure a domestic industry producing like or comparable products or retards the
establishment of a potential industry. It is a form of price discrimination between two national markets.
13 A product can be considered dumped where the export price of that product is less than its normal value,
that is, the comparable price in the ordinary course of trade for the like product destined for consumption in
the exporting country.

The opposition to the claim of PAMPHIL


Although, PAMPHIL is claiming that Turkey is guilty of dumping its flour in
the country, not everyone is in favor of the imposition of additional anti-dumping
duty on wheat flour imports from turkey. Ernesto Chua, president of the Malabon
Longlife Trading Corporation, an importer and distributor of Turkish flour said that
Cheap Turkish flour is usually used by small bakeries for pandesal and pastries, and
traders said the supply will drop dramatically in July when stocks are expected to
have been exhausted. 14 As a result, bread prices are expected to go up by as much
20 percent. Chua mentioned that due to the actions of PAMPHIL, what will happen is
that, over and above the regular import duty on flour, the provisional duties of 21.79
percent will be imposed on hard flour making bread, 39.26 percent on biscuit flour,
and 35.21 percent in soft flour for pastries and cookies. As a consequence, there are
exporters that have already cancelled their orders and in general, we will be
importing less.
Philippine traders imported 144,000 MT of Turkish flour last year, meeting 7
percent of the domestic demand. This market share is expected to drop to 3 percent
while the provisional import duty is in place, and traders are expected to look for
other sources of the commodity.
The Turkish Flour Yeast and Ingredients Promotion Group (TFYI) is appealing the
case before the Tariff Commission. Malabon Longlife is a member of TFYI, which
groups traders that export wheat flour and other Turkish product.
Avsin Kasikci head of a business delegation from Turkey, said that Turkish
flour exporters will present our case to prove that there is no need for any definitive
anti-dumping measure.
Turkish flour is not sold at dumping prices in the
Philippines, it is sold at competitive prices 15
Kasikci added that "We are here to grow our partnership with the Filipinos not
only through trade relations, but also valuable projects that will create meaningful
and long-lasting benefits. As a leading wheat flout producer in the world, Turkey
enjoys the economies of scale advantage which allows its exporters to share the cost
benefits to their trade partners in over 120 countries. 16
According to Chua, The average Philippine price of Turkish flour is $400 per
MT for soft flour and $450 for hard flour, noting the selling price includes freight
14Anti-dumping duties to cut Turkish flour imports by 50% in July ,traders say GMA News Online available
at http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/362730/economy/agricultureandmining/anti-dumping-duties-to-cutturkish-flour-imports-by-50-in-july-traders-say (last accessed October 9, 2014).

15 Id.
16 Id.
6

and other expenses. The figures given by Chua is contrary to the findings of the
Agriculture Department which declared that Turkish flour sells for around $348 per
metric ton (MT) in the Philippine market, compared with the domestic prices of $470
per MT.
It is also important to note that at the consumer level, bakers pay P700 per 25kilogram bag of Turkish flour against P900 for the locally-milled product.
The implications of the implementation of additional duty on Turkish flour do
not only affect the flour milling industry. The baking industry is directly affected by
the imposition of additional duty on Turkish flour.
Filipino-Chinese Bakery Association (FCBA) said the price of pan de sal
could go up if the government would impose additional duty on Turkish flour.The
group warned that the price of Pinoy pan de sal, other bread products, biscuits and
noodles could go up by 10 percent to 15 percent if additional duty is imposed on
Turkish flour.The group said: Due to cheaper Turkish flour, Filipino consumers
enjoy lower priced breads and other flour-based products such as dry noodles,
biscuits and fishballs. 17
Analysis
Given the background of the party which advocates the imposition of
additional duty on the importation of Turkish Flour as well as the contingencies
which adhere to the notion that the imposition of additional duty on Turkish flour
will be detrimental to the Filipino people, it would be imperative that the act of the
DA imposing additional duty on Turkish flour be scrutinized in order to assess
whether the additional duty on Turkish flour is what is best for the country.
It would be best to analyze the situation in four levels. The first level is to
determine whether the placing of anti-dumping safeguards is the most appropriate
course of action to take. The second level will be a brief comparison with the rice
industry in the country and to determine whether there are certain similarities in
order to assess if the course of action is what is truly beneficial to the country. The
third level is to determine how Turkey can afford to give such a significant discount
and whether that in itself is an unfair trade practice. Finally, there must be an
evaluation of the local industry in order to determine what will be best in order for
the Philippines to progress as a Nation.

17 Philippines are split into two on flour import from Turkey, available at
http://en.millermagazine.com/philippines-are-split-into-two-on-flour-import-from-turkey/(last accessed October
9, 2014).

At the very onset of the problem that involves unfair trading, what needs to be
determined is the proper course of action a Country should take. As previously
mentioned, international trade is a tool that can be used to alleviate poverty. While
professing support for trade liberalization, trade policy makers often insist that
international trade should at the same time be fair. 18
In WTO law, dumping is not prohibited 19 . However, dumping is condemned if
it causes injury to the domestic industry of the importing country. The essence of the
WTO rules on dumping is that members are allowed to take certain measures , which
are otherwise WTO-inconsistent, to protect their domestic industry from effects of
dumping. 20
The importation of Turkey of flour to the Philippines is a clear case of
dumping. There is a similarity in the product as well as there is a discrepancy
between the import price and the normal value. That being said, when a foreign
country dumps a product in the Philippines, it does not ipso facto mean that a case
of anti-dumping should be filed against the foreign country. The dumping of the
product in certain instances may even be beneficial for the economy of the
Philippines. There are certain factors that should first be considered. In Thailand
H-Beams, the Appellate Body referred to article 3.1 as an overarching provision that
set forth a members fundamental, substantive obligation with respect to the
determination of injury. 21 These obligations concern the following:

The determination of the volume of dumped imports and their effect on prices
(Article 3.2)
Investigations of imports from more than one country (Article 3.3)
The impact of dumped imports on the domestic industry (Article 3.5)
The assessment of the domestic production of the like product (Article 3.6)
and
The determination of the thereat of material injury (Article 3.7 and 3.8) 22

Furthermore, Article 3.1 requires that a determination of injury to the domestic


market must involve an examination of both a) the volume of the dumped imports
and the effect of the dumped import on prices in the domestic market for like
products and b) the consequent impact of these imports on domestic producers of
such products. 23
Based on the abovementioned obligations and criterion, the key element to be
ascertained in order to determine whether there is a case of anti-dumping against
18 Manual of Reference on Law and Economic Development for the Philippine Judiciary
19 www.wto/org/english/news_e/pres04_e/pr387_e.htm (last accessed October 9, 2014)
20 Manual of Reference on Law and Economic Development for the Philippine Judiciary
21 Id.at p 528 citing Appellate Body report , Thailand- H-Beams, para 106.
22 Id.
23 Id.
8

Turkey is the volume of dumped imports and the effect of the dumped imports on
prices in the domestic market for like products.
Pinca noted that while imported flour also comes in from countries like
Indonesia, Vietnam, Australia and even India, PAFMIL never raised the issue of
dumping nor safeguards or countervailing duties because they are not dumping their
flour in the Philippines. They play fair, he said 24 . To this extent, it should be noted
that according to a news article posted by the Manila Bulletin, Gardenia Bakeries
Philippines Inc. is now using cheaper priced Indonesian flour for the production of
Pinoy Tasty after several attempts to use the locally-produced Harinang Pinoy failed
due to quality issue. 25
Gardenia president and general manager Simplicio Umali Jr. told reporters that
while Indonesian flour, which they bought at P840 per bag delivered, is more
expensive than Harinang Pinoy, which they got at P770 per bag delivered,
Indonesian flour has been able to meet its desired quality because it is high-protein. 26
''We are now buying 20-30 container loads of Indonesian flour a month for Pinoy
Tasty production because we cannot use Turkish flour because it is of low protein
although we understand that Turkish flour has improved its quality a lot,'' Umali
said. Imported Turkish flour is the cheapest source of flour in the market. It is being
sold for P720 to P750 per bag delivered. According to Umali, they tried to patronize
Harinang Pinoy, which is produced by RFM Corporation, starting November last
year but they gave it up last May because it has a higher rejection rate. 27
Based on the actions of Gardenia, it is clear that there are other sources of flour
which local bakeries, which is the number one consumer of flour in the country, get
their flour from aside from turkey. The presence of Turkish flour at a relatively
cheaper price in the local market does not mean that it causes damage to the local
flour industry. Factors such as the quality of the flour are critical to the major local
bakeries. Countries such as Indonesia, Vietnam, Australia and even India all import
flour into the country. These countries, which import flour, also have and effect on
the price of flour in the country because Turkey does not have the monopoly of
importing flour into the Philippines.
Based on the abovementioned facts, it is eveident that after examining both
the volume of the dumped imports of Turkey and the effect of the imported flour on
prices in the domestic market for locally produced flour and the consequent impact
24 Anti-dumping case vs Turkish flour, Malaya, September 19, 2014. available at
http://www.malaya.com.ph/business-news/business/anti-dumping-case-vs-turkish-flour (last accessed October 9,
2014)
25 Gardenia shifts to Indonesian flour, Manila Bulletin, July 22, 2013, available at
https://ph.news.yahoo.com/gardenia-shifts-indonesian-flour-164112169.html (last accessed October 9, 2014)
26 Id.
27 Id.

of these imports on domestic producers of such products there is no material injury


suffered by the local market.
It should be pointed out that Victorio Mario A. Dimagiba, director of DTIs
Bureau of Trade Regulation and Consumer Protection (BTRCP) acted on behalf of
the consumers and sued 11 flour millers for profiteering before the DTI-National
Capital Region on June 9, 2010. 28 DTI filed separate Complaint-Affidavits against
the 11 flour millers before the DTI-National Capital Region for violating Section
5(2) of the Republic Act 7581 or the Price Act defining and prohibiting profiteering
as one of the illegal acts of price manipulation. Profiteering is defined as the sale or
offering for sale of any basic necessity or prime commodity at a price grossly in
excess of its true worth. 29
On July 29, 2010, DTI-NCR adjudication officer Ma. Carolina I. Carbonell
dismissed the case on technicality saying the complainant failed to submit the
required documents to warrant the filing of a formal charge against the millers. The
DTI-NCR said that Dimagiba failed to submit the certificate of non-forum
shopping, a requisite for filing a verified complaint or formal charge required under
Section 4, Rule III of DAO No. 07, Series of 2006. 30
The profiteering case was dismissed on a mere technicality this sheds a huge
cloud of doubt as to whether the major players in the local flour industry is selling
locally produced flour at a price grossly in excess of its true worth hence the
difference between the price of imported Turkish flour and the locally produced
flour.
Furthermore, at the consumer level, the mass of Filipino people will suffer
from the price increase of basic daily commodities such as dry noodles, biscuits,
fishballs and the ever so popular Pinoy Pan de Sal. There needs to be a determination
of the effects of the anti-dumping measure to be taken and whether it would be
beneficial to the Nation economically as a whole or whether the imposition of the
anti-dumping measure will merely cater to a small group of Filipino people.
The second level of analysis is a brief comparison between the current rice
problem the country is facing. The discussion will no longer be in depth because the
issue on rice quotas alone is a whole different topic which should also be analyzed
and critiqued. The discussion will focus more on the intervention of the Philippine
government and whether the intervention did any good for the nation. At present, the
Philippines is allowing 350,000 metric tons (MT) of rice to enter the country
annually at reduced tariff rate of 40 percent. 31 Tariff rate quotas (TRQs) are one of
28 DTI Gives up Profiteering Case vs Flour, Newslink TV, May 16, 2011, available at
http://newslinktv.blogspot.com/2011/05/dti-gives-up-profiteering-case-vs-flour.html (last accessed October 9,
2014).
29 Global Forum on Competition Prepared by Victorio Mario A. Dimagiba, Director, Bureau of Trade
Regulation and Consumer Protection, Department of Trade and Industry, Philippines.
30 Supra note 28.
31 http://www.manilatimes.net/philippines-sets-limited-rice-imports/19324/ (last accessed October 9, 2014)

10

the most widely used trade policy instruments in agricultural trade. The issue of
whether TRQs are efficient trade policy instruments for improving market access has
been widely debated. Some believe that TRQs impose an extra barrier to trade,
circumvent the reforms sought under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) and World Trade Organization (WTO) and may not be as attractive as
initially envisioned. Others believe that the TRQs are useful and facilitate trade and
liberalization. Any expansion in quota, or decrease in tariffs, or combinations of the
two, has the potential to liberalize trade in a specific industry. 32 The article written
by Gerrardo Sicat provides for a perfect summary of the rice situation in the
country.33
The tensions felt by the nation in the scandal of rice
smuggling is a symptom of what underlies the current state of
economic policies pertaining to the food production sector.
Beneath the problem lurks the policy of protectionism that the
government has put in place to help entrenched producers in
the agricultural sector.
I will explain why smuggling, corruption and protectionism come
together as a single package. In fact, they almost become one and
the same thing! This was the bane of past setback in Philippine
industrialization. And this could be the lynchpin for a setback in
food production even as we move forward economically.
The industry watchdog in the private sector, the Philippine
Federation of Industries, has estimated, based on discrepancies in
Philippine import data and the export data of major trading
partners, that the volume of smuggling is astounding, exceeding
P300 billion alone in 2010 and 2011.
A recent internal report in the Finance Department has
categorically stated that a long history of backroom deals,
institutionalized theft and impunity has made the Bureau of
Customs one of the most prominent faces of corruption in the
government.
Rice smuggling in the news and in the Senate hearing. High
domestic demand for rice and the high cost of production in the
country relative to low-cost rice production elsewhere in
Southeast Asia Thailand and Vietnam in particular are two
major factors that have contributed to continued rice importation
by the Phillippines.
In addition , the country has been unable to produce sufficient
rice for the nations needs , despite rising yields. This has
32 IMPLEMENTATION OF TARIFF RATE QUOTAS IN THE PHILIPPINES byPRECELES HERNANDEZ
MANZO (last accessed October 9, 2014)
33 http://www.philstar.com/business/2014/02/05/1286658/rice-smuggling-corruption-protectionism-almostsame-thing (last accessed October 9, 2014)

11

necessitated rice importation to assure the countrys food


security.
Rice importation is regulated by the National Food Authority
(NFA). It used to be that the NFA was the sole legal importer of
rice. After determining the nations supply deficiency, it would
contract the nations import needs directly.
The practice has changed. As the countrys food stabilization
agency with powers to intervene in the rice trade and
distribution, it has had a colourful history. In the domestic sector
it sets the prices of palay prior to milling and then mills what it
buys for storage and sale to the public. It acts as a rice price
stabilizer for domestic production and distribution.
That role extended to the purchase and resale of imported rice to
the public. That was good until the practice was changed during
the time of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo when the direct importation
of rice was transferred to private importers but under a regime of
quantitative restrictions for each quota holder.
Who benefited from the import quotas. To import rice, quota
holders were initially awarded licenses by the NFA. Qualified
quota holders were grains importers, individuals, and entities
including farmers organizations (associations and cooperatives).
The choices were undertaken by the agency. In distributing them,
there were few requirements to enable quota applicants. The
import quotas were not auctioned to the highest bidders.
The government, therefore, did not earn any income
commensurate with the privileges being offered. Thus, selected
quota holders were probably parties close to the agency or to the
government in power.
In the Senate hearing, however, what surfaced was that those
who were allocated import quotas turned around quickly and sold
their quotas to other rice traders at a premium. That meant easy
money just to be a quota holder.
Eventually, too, only a few traders controlled the importation of
rice through the consolidation of the purchases of the individual
quota holders.
In all these, the protection that was supposed to benefit rice
farmers did not go directly to that group. The beneficiaries were
those lucky to receive quotas and the traders who made profits
from the trading acitivity.
12

The face of corruption. Easily, this practice led to the


following: the quota holders made a quick profit. The rice
importers who eventually consolidated imported the rice from the
designated sources. These importers were required to pay a 40
percent tariff on the imported rice.
Did they pay the relevant import duties? Reports of smuggling of
rice indicate some hint of failure to collect the tariff duties on the
rice imports.
Hence, this could only mean that expected revenues from the rice
imports were never fully collected. As a result, the high tariffs
did not result in having any revenues earned to help strengthen
the state coffers.
Philippine agriculture and the processed food industry is highly
protectionist. Before the countrys accession to the WTO, the
agricultural sector enjoyed protectionism mainly in the form of
non-tariff barriers. As part of its accession to that international
trade body, it committed toward remove non-tariff barriers that
existed before.
This was done through the Agricultural Tarification Act of 1996
(Republic Act 8178). This law repealed other laws and
regulations that granted quantitative restrictions to several
agricultural products. Except for the countrys staple, rice, which
was allowed temporary use of quantitative restrictions, the other
agricultural products were given tariff adoption guidelines.
This led to some tariff rates on a few agricultural products which
were given substantial tariffs. Among these are onions, potatoes,
garlic and cabbages. Because of their high tariffs, these products
are also the object of smuggling.
Lessons from the past. Food prices are a significant part of the
poors incomes. High tariffs and protection for many industries
do not protect industries as often claimed by their proponents.
Instead, protection serves to make our industries less competitive
and less innovative. As a result, they fall behind other foreign
producers making the country economically strong.
Also, high protective tariffs encourage smugglers. It gives them
ammunition to defy and corrupt further our weak institutions. In
the end, they also lead to higher prices. The wrong parties are
enriched!
As seen for the above-cited article, it is clear that the imposition of Rice
13

Quota had an adverse effect in the rice industry. It is therefore evident that not all
acts of the government to promote fair trade and acts which are intended to be for
the protection of the local industry actually help the intended industry. The same
case can be made for the imposition of additional duties on flour being imported
from Turkey. The imposition of additional duties may lead to more smuggling cases
and higher prices.

The third level to be analyzed is how Turkey is able to give such a great
discount without suffering losses. The main reason behind the discrepancy between
the import price and normal value is the subsidy the Turkish government gives to the
flour industry in Turkey. It must be noted that certain types of subsidization in itself
constitute unfair trade. In particular, the SCM agreement provides for the prohibited
subsidies which are a) export subsidies and import substitution subsidies. Based on
the case filed by Pafmil, there is no concrete evidence showing that the subsidies
granted by the Turkish government falls under any of the prohibited forms of
subsidization. Therefore, it safe to conclude that the there is no unfair practice of
subsidization occurring.

Finally, it is important to look at the local flour milling industry to determine


whether the presence of imported flour in the market is a detriment to the local
industry or it should serve as form of competition in order to drive the local industry
to seek innovation to remain competitive with foreign competitors.

Republic flour mills (RFM) the first milling company in the Philippines
started its operations in 1958. It was established to address the need of the country to
be self-sufficient in a basic food commodity like flour. RFM was the pioneer of the
flour-milling industry in the Asian region and it evolved from a single company
producing bags of flour, to a multi-company enterprise managing a chain of branded
products. Its first flour mill is located on a seven-hectare land in Mandaluyong,
Metro Manila. Because of the success of the Republic Flour Mills, competitors were
attracted to join the flour milling industry. At present, there are twelve companies
engaged in the manufacturing of flour which is affiliated with two industry
organizations namely the Philippine Association of Flour Millers (PAFMIL) and the
Chamber of Philippine Flour Millers (CHAMPFLOUR). PAFMIL is composed of
RFM, Liberty Flour Mills, Wellington Flour Mills, Pilmico Foods Corporation,
General Milling Corporation, Universal Robina Corporation and the Philippine Flour
Mills. CHAMPLOUR on the other hand is composed of San Miguel Mills, Philippine
Foremost Milling Corporation, Morning Star Milling Corporation and Delta Milling
Corporation. 34
Despite the reliance of the country in the importation of flour, Nestor
Constancia, president of the Philippine Baking Industry Group, said two new
flourmills have been operational Asia Grains in Cebu and Atlantic Grains in Laguna.
34 Global Forum on Competition Prepared by Victorio Mario A. Dimagiba, Director, Bureau of Trade
Regulation and Consumer Protection, Department of Trade and Industry, Philippines.

14

Another flourmill is being established in Subic. 35 The opening of these flourmills


show that there is still profit to be made in the flourmill industry in the Philippines.
The problem is not with the lack of willing participants in the industry as well as the
preference of the end user. As seen in the aforementioned case of Gardenia Bakeries
Philippines Inc. shifting from local suppliers to an Indonesian supplier. The problem
is that the quality of the local flour being produced is not at par with other foreign
suppliers. The answer to the problem is not to restrict free trade rather it is to
promote free trade in order to motivate the local industry to be innovative and more
efficient with its procedure. The Filipino first policy as mentioned by the Supreme
Court was not meant to be an isolationist policy. Filipino consumers will ultimately
choose Filipino suppliers provided that the Filipino product is highly competitive or
similar to foreign products.
Conclusion
The imposition of additional duty in the importation of Turkish flour is not
the best approach, which the Government could have done. The WTO does not
condemn dumping per se. The prohibition guaranteed by law is a case of dumping
which results in material injury to a domestic industry. The importation of flour by
Turkey into the Philippines does not cause material injury to the local flour milling
industry.

35 http://www.mb.com.ph/new-flour-mills-offer-cheaper-prices/ (last accessed October 9, 2014)


15

You might also like