Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FO desalination benefits
Energy consumption
typically up to 30% lower
than conventional Reverse
Osmosis (RO)
Reverse Osmosis
(RO)
Membrane Fouling
Energy Consumption
Operational Costs
Boron Removal
P1 - P2 >
Process explained
Product 72 m 3/d
P2
RO
P1
A1 Khaluf FO Plant
A1 Khaluf, Oman
2kW
A1 Khaluf RO Plant
Brine 188 m /d
3
FO
25kW
AI Khaluf FO Plant
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Product 72 m 3/d
Feed 288 m 3/d
Seawater or brackish
water feed
May 2010
2kW
AI Khaluf RO Plant
5.0
4.5
35% Conversion
Feed 288 m 3/d Membranes 4Installed
4.0
barg
August 2009, 4.2 m 3/h
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Jan 2010
Feb 2010
Mar 2010
Apr 2010
Jun 2010
Regeneration
RO
A1 Khaluf
FO
Feb 2010
Mar
2010 Plant
Apr 2010
47% Conversion
65 barg
42% reduction in
energy consumption
vs RO at A1 Khaluf
25% Conversion
65 barg
Jan 2010
35% Conversion
4 barg
Jul 2010
19kW
Aug 2010
Sep 2010
Oct 2010
Nov 2010
Dec 2010
Typical Year
47% Conversion
65 barg
FO System
Regeneration
FO
Jun 2010
Jul 2010
Typical Year
Aug 2010
Sep 2010
Concentrated
Osmotic Agent
Diluted
Osmotic Agent
3
/d on New Membranes
Brine
188 m
Cleaning
Activity
Oct 2010
Nov 2010
Dec 2010
Regeneration System
19kW
42% reduction in
energy consumption
vs RO at A1 Khaluf
25% Conversion
65 barg
Brine 216 m 3/d
25kW
Osmotic
Agent
(High
Osmotic
Pressure)
P1
A1 Khaluf RO Plant
Source
Water
(Seawater
or brackish
water)
Capital Cost
P2
Osmotic
Agent
(High
Osmotic
Pressure)
Ease of Operation
P1 - P2 >
Forward Osmosis
(FO)
Technology Status
Product Water
Other offices:
Modern Water
Villa 10593
Way No 4494
Azaibah
Muscat
Sultanate of Oman
Modern Water
903, Al Thuraya
Tower 1
Dubai Media City
Dubai
UAE
Modern Water
Unit 1701-2
Westgate Tower
1038 Nanjing Road W
Shanghai200041
China
www.modernwater.com
DesalJun12