Professional Documents
Culture Documents
February 1, 2007
Keith Weitz
RTI International
1
Objectives
Background on life cycle concept
Landfill discussion
Waste-to-energy discussion
Summary of life cycle tradeoffs
2
What is Life Cycle Assessment?
A systems analysis, not
isolated operations.
Considers upstream and
downstream burdens.
Multi-media and multi-
pollutant.
Main components:
¡ Goals and Scoping
¡ Inventory Analysis
¡ Impact Assessment
¡ Interpretation
3
Life Cycle for Solid Waste Management
MSW
Landfill
Recycling
Ash
Collection and WTE
Landfill
Composting
Materials
Recycling
Compost
Product
Use
4
Life Cycle Inventory Module
Energy Materials
Solid Products
Waste Management
Waste Activity/Operation Energy
Water
Air Pollution Residual
Emissions Waste
5
Landfills
6
Old Landfill Design – Managed Dumps
7
Modern Landfill Design – Highly
Engineered Sites
8
US Federal MSW Landfill Standards
Location restrictions.
Composite liners requirements.
Leachate collection and removal system requirements.
Operating practices.
Groundwater monitoring requirements—requires testing.
Closure and postclosure care requirements.
Corrective action provisions for control and clean up landfill
releases to achieve groundwater protection standards.
Financial assurance for environmental protection during
closure and post-closure care.
9
Landfill Leachate Collection and
Treatment: Offsite or Onsite
t
m en
at
Tre
si te
Off
On
sit
e Tre
atm
Leachate Collection System en
t
10
Landfill Gas Collection and
Management: Flare or Energy Recovery
re
Fla
En
erg
y Re
co
ver
y
11
Waste-to-Energy
12
“Waste-to-Energy” Systems
Thermal Systems:
Mass Burn
Controlled-Air, Modular-Municipal
Gasification
Pyrolysis
Non-Thermal Systems:
Anaerobic digestion
Hydrolysis
13
Mass Burn Technology
Well proven technology for MSW.
Minimum waste preparation.
Higher capital cost.
Complete burnout residues.
Reduce waste volume by 75-80%.
Metals can be recovered.
Ash can be reused or landfilled.
14
Mass Burn WTE Plant: Water and Air
Pollution Control Systems
r
w ate
ste
Wa
Ba
gh
o us
e
Modern Mass Burn WTE Plant
15
Life Cycle Comparison of Landfill
and WTE Options
16
Net Total Cost for WTE and Landfill
Options
250,000,000
200,000,000
Annual Cost ($)
150,000,000
100,000,000
50,000,000
0
Landfill - Vent Landfill - Flare Landfill - Energy WTE
Per 1,800,000 tons of waste and assuming equal 20 mile haul distance.
17
Net Total Energy Consumption for
WTE and Landfill Options
5,000,000
0
Annual Energy Consumption (MBTU
-10,000,000
-15,000,000
-20,000,000
-25,000,000
-30,000,000
Per 1,800,000 tons of waste and assuming equal 20 mile haul distance.
18
Net Total Life Cycle Carbon Emissions
for WTE and Landfill Options
500,000
400,000
Annual Carbon Emissions (MTCE)
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
Landfill - Vent Landfill - Flare Landfill - Energy WTE
-100,000
-200,000
Per 1,800,000 tons of waste and assuming equal 20 mile haul distance.
19
Net Total Life Cycle Criteria Emissions
for WTE and Landfill Options
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
-1,000,000 Landfill - Vent Landfill - Flare Landfill - Energy WTE PM
Pounds
-2,000,000 SOx
-3,000,000 NOx
-4,000,000 CO
-5,000,000
-6,000,000
-7,000,000
-8,000,000
-9,000,000
-10,000,000
Per 1,800,000 tons of waste and assuming equal 20 mile haul distance.
20
Summary of Life Cycle Tradeoffs
Both are well established and tested, accept
unprocessed waste, have pollution control
requirements.
Landfill typically cheaper
WTE more efficient at recovering energy
WTE avoids landfill methane
WTE can include metals recovery
WTE produces ash that must be managed
21
Thank You
Keith A. Weitz
RTI International
3040 Cornwallis Road
RTP, NC 27709
Ph: 919-541-6973
Fax: 919-541-7155
Email: kaw@rti.org
22