FOR

DEVELOPING-UNDER DEVELOPED
COUNTRIES

Executive Project Summary

This investment presentation is intended for review by potential financial institutions and investors to
provide funds of 55,987,257,650 for The WES Project, developing and under-developed countries.
The purpose of this presentation is to introduce an objective analysis for the development of the WES
Project. The presentation provides the reference material that will demonstrate an approximate 8
times return of gross revenue on investment of 55,987,257,650. The project will optimized the
zoning, a projection of the highest and best uses; and the future potential for First World Class
Water-Energy-Sewage Scientific Multipurpose Complex Development.
Survey Economic and Political Environment
Advantages and economic potential that are offered to foreign investments in developing and underdeveloping countries are excellent. The WES Project Development will attract an increase of 135158% more tourists to the average of the 10,102,500 tourists per year, create employment for
approximately 385,850 persons and provide social and economical benefits for a population of over
275,000,000 persons
Proposed Goal
To build a self sufficient Wind Energy Power Mega Project, that will provide complete energy services
for (a) Sea Water Desalination, (b) Energy and (c) Sewage System for approximately 55 million users.
Method of Achieving Goals
To achieve our goals, we shall enter into joint ventures with international entities, namely from
France, Denmark, England, Switzerland, China, and government supports from other countries.
Market
Services will be supply at an economical rate, lower that the costs that are now being offered to both
the public and private sectors.
Funding Request Expectations
A start-up fund of 500M, to commence the anti-project, city, urban and rural planning, property and
operation expenses, a draw down of 323M/Quarter for approximately seven (7) years to a total of
55, 987,257,650
Exit Strategy
The WES Development shall be manage by MERO INTERNATIONAL, where services will be provided
and project is calculated on a thirty (30) years repayment plan.

P-4

WATER
Wind Powered Sea Water Desalination
More and more countries have started to cover their water consumption by means of sea
water desalination plants. At the same time new technologies for sea water desalination
have been rapidly developed and the efficiency of such plants is continuously being
increased. Consequently, prime costs and operation costs have been considerably reduced.
Every kind of water desalination requires electrical power. To produce this electrical power
by using conventional energy sources means increasing the CO2, which affects the
environment. WES can provide a new water desalination system, which operates with wind
and solar energy as a stand-alone-system.

P-5

ELECTRICITY
Wind Powered Electricity

Wind Powered Energy is a free, renewable resource, so no matter how much is used today, there will
still be the same supply in the future. Wind Energy is also a source of clean, non-polluting, electricity.
Unlike conventional power plants, wind plants emit no air pollutants or greenhouse gases. The terms
Wind Energy" or "wind power" describe the process by which the wind is used to generate electricity;
wind turbines convert the kinetic energy in the wind into mechanical power, generators are use to
convert this mechanical power into electricity.
WES development may compete with other uses for the land, and those alternative uses will be more
highly valued electricity generation. However, wind turbines can be located on land that is also used for
grazing and/or farming.
P-6

SEWAGE
Wind Powered Sewage System

FIVE-STAGE PROCESSING
The sewage is processed in five stages:
The inlet works screen items like wood, bricks, rags, paper, plastic and grit.
Primary settlement uses gravity to settle the finer solids as raw sludge.
The remaining 'settled sewage' flows to the biological treatment plant for secondary treatment, where
polluting organic matter and ammonia is consumed by bacteria.
The resulting 'mixed liquor' (activated sludge and effluent) passes for final settlement. The treated
effluent flows over the weirs as clean water, where it is strictly monitored before being discharged.
Sludge treatment thickens and mixes raw and activated sludge before they are pumped to the sludgepowered generator.
Reduction in Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Estimating the Potential Contribution from Wind Power

P-7

Nuclear Power Plant

To turn nuclear fission into electrical energy, the first step for nuclear
power plant operators is to be able to control the energy given off by
the enriched uranium and allow it to heat water into steam.
Enriched uranium is typically formed into inch-long (2.5-cm-long)
pellets, each with approximately the same diameter as a dime. Next
the pellets are arranged into long rods, and the rods are collected
together into bundles. The bundles are submerged in water inside a
pressure vessel. The water acts as a coolant. For the reactor to work,
the submerged bundles must be slightly supercritical. Left to its own
devices, the uranium would eventually overheat and melt.
To prevent overheating, control rods made of a material that absorbs
neutrons are inserted into the uranium bundle using a mechanism that
can raise or lower the control rods. Raising and lowering the control
rods allow operators to control the rate of the nuclear reaction. When
an operator wants the uranium core to produce more heat, the control
rods are raised out of the uranium bundle (thus absorbing fewer
neutrons). To create less heat, they are lowered into the uranium
bundle. The rods can also be lowered completely into the uranium
bundle to shut the reactor down in the case of an accident or to
change the fuel.
P-8

P-9

Radioactive Substances
The uranium bundle acts as an extremely high-energy source of
heat. It heats the water and turns it to steam. The steam drives a
turbine, which spins a generator to produce power. Humans have
been harnessing the expansion of water into steam for hundreds of
years.
In some nuclear power plants, the steam from the reactor goes
through a secondary, intermediate heat exchanger to convert
another loop of water to steam, which drives the turbine. The
advantage to this design is that the radioactive water/steam never
contacts the turbine. Also, in some reactors, the coolant fluid in
contact with the reactor core is gas (carbon dioxide) or liquid metal
(sodium, potassium); these types of reactors allow the core to be
operated at higher temperatures.
Given all the radioactive elements inside a nuclear power plant, it
shouldn't come as a surprise that there's a little more to a plant's
outside than you'd find at a coal power plant.
P-10

Primary Fuel Use for Electricity Generation

Natural gas is increasingly becoming the fuel of choice for new electricity
projects around the globe. Over the 1996-2020 projection period, natural gas is
expected to gain share in North American electricity generation markets relative
to coal and nuclear power. South America is expected to increase natural gas
consumption to supplement its large base of hydroelectricity generation.
Western Europe is moving from nuclear to greater reliance on gas. Eastern
Europe is expected to move from coal to gas. And a major share of capacity
expansion in Asia and the Middle East will rely on natural gas.
Overall, natural gas is expected to account for 25 percent of world electricity
fuels market in 2020, as compared with 16 percent in 1996. Favouring natural
gas are increased confidence in the availability of future supplies, significant
improvements in gas turbine technology, the relatively smaller negative effects
of gas-fired generation on air quality than those of other fossil fuels, and the
increasing availability of imported liquefied natural gas (LNG). Although
currently accounting for only 5 percent of world gas consumption, LNG exports
have grown by 38 percent since 1992.
Pipeline trade in natural gas, currently almost triple the volume of LNG trade, is
also growing rapidly. In recent years, exports of natural gas from Canada to the
United States, from Norway and Russia to Western Europe, and from Algeria to
Italy and Spain have led the increase. Upon the completion of a number of
pipeline projects under construction or now being planned in South America,
Argentina, Bolivia and Venezuela will become major exporters of natural gas and
Chile and Brazil will become major importers.
P-11

Region and Fuel

Industrialized

1996

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

77.9

83.2

89.5

93.9

98.7

102.4

Oil

5.2

5.8

5.3

5.2

5.5

5.7

Natural Gas

7.7

9.7

13.8

16.2

20.5

23.2

Coal

28.0

29.8

30.5

31.3

32.3

33.2

Nuclear

19.8

20.0

19.6

19.2

17.0

15.5

Renewables

17.2

17.8

20.3

21.9

23.3

24.8

24.4

23.8

26.1

27.4

28.9

30.8

Oil

2.7

2.8

2.8

3.0

3.1

3.2

Natural Gas

9.6

9.7

11.3

12.7

14.2

16.1

Coal

6.4

5.9

5.9

5.3

4.4

3.9

Nuclear

2.8

2.8

2.9

3.0

3.1

2.7

Renewables

2.9

2.7

3.1

3.4

4.1

4.9

41.1

46.4

58.2

69.8

81.4

93.8

Oil

5.3

5.9

7.0

8.2

9.4

10.7

Natural Gas

5.2

6.3

8.8

11.8

14.8

18.3

18.5

20.3

25.1

30.3

35.5

41.2

1.5

1.7

2.4

3.0

3.5

3.6

10.6

12.2

14.9

16.5

18.2

20.0

143.4

153.4

173.8

191.1

209.0

227.0

Oil

13.3

14.5

15.1

16.4

18.0

19.6

Natural Gas

22.5

25.6

33.9

40.8

49.6

57.7

Coal

52.8

56.0

61.5

66.9

72.2

78.3

Nuclear

24.1

24.5

24.9

25.2

23.6

21.7

Renewables

30.7

32.7

38.3

41.9

45.6

49.7

EE/FSU

Developing

Coal
Nuclear
Renewables
Total World

Note: EE/FSU = Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union

P-12

P-13

Benefits of Natural Gas

Using natural gas in place of other fuels can help ease a number of
environmental concerns greenhouse gas emissions, acid rain, smog, solid
waste and water pollution. When natural gas is burned, it produces virtually no
emissions of sulfur dioxide or particulate matter and far lower levels of
"greenhouse" gases and nitrogen oxides than such competing sources of energy
as oil and coal. In addition, unlike the oil, coal and nuclear processes, the
natural gas process produces virtually no solid waste and has much less impact
on water quality.
The inherent cleanliness of natural gas when compared with those other fuels,
coupled with the high efficiency of natural gas equipment, means that
substituting gas for the other fuels can help reduce the emission of the air
pollutants that produce smog and acid rain and that could exacerbate the
"greenhouse" effect. The natural gas system is extremely efficient as are most
types of appliances and equipment that operate on natural gas. Energy
efficiency refers to the energy input per unit of useful energy output. The higher
the energy efficiency, the greater the conservation of energy and the lower the
environmental impacts.
When the entire cycle of producing, processing, transporting and using energy
is considered, natural gas is delivered to the consumer with a "total energy
efficiency" of about 90 percent, compared with about 27 percent for electricity.
Moreover, gas appliances and equipment are extremely efficient as evidenced
by the fact that the residential use of gas per customer is about 16 percent less
today than it was in 1980.
P-14

P-15

Natural Gas
Natural gas is the most economical energy choice. Natural gas is usually the most
economical form of energy available regardless of which competing fuel it is
measured against, the application involved or the geographical location of the
consumer.
For instance, using the 1999 average national energy prices published by the
Department of Energy, heating an average-size house in a moderate climate costs
5 percent less to heat with gas than with heating oil and 33 percent less than with
an electric heat pump. Similarly, using gas to heat household water is about half
as expensive as using electricity. Even with the aggressive demand levels of the
accelerated projection, gas will remain price-competitive.
Natural gas is a highly reliable North American energy source. Approximately 85
percent of the natural gas consumed in the United States is produced domestically
from the nation's extensive gas resource base. Nearly all of the remaining 15
percent is produced in North America, primarily in Canada. In comparison, close
to 60 percent of the oil used in the United States is imported from foreign
countries, some of which are politically unstable.
Furthermore, natural gas is a reliable source of fuel not only because most of the
supply is domestic, but also because the pipeline delivery system is underground
and protected from weather-related disruptions.
This reliability is one of the reasons businesses that cannot afford power
disruptions find gas-fired distributed electricity generation so attractive.
P-16

95-MW, 3+2 combined-cycle block with

5001P, with 2 X 114 MW GT11N2 Gas
Turbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-Slovenia

420-MW, Single shaft combined-cycle

block with SGT5-4000F Gas Turbine. Fuel:
Natural Gas-Norway
P-17

P-18

2 X 185 MW 1+1 combined-cycle blocks

with 9001E gas turbines. Fuel: Coal
Syngas, Natural Gas-Czech Republic

CHP plant with 2 X 5.25 MW CX501KB7S

Gas Turbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-Poland
P-19

P-20

Electric Generation
Because of its many economic and environmental benefits, Natural Gas has
become the fuel of choice for energy generation. In the 1990s, there was a
dramatic shift to Natural Gas for the generation of energy. Large coal and nuclear
generating plants were the clear choice of electric utility planners in the 1970s
and 1980s, but a combination of economic, environmental and technological
factors have resulted in a pronounced movement to gas. In fact, virtually all new
generating capacity being added today will rely on gas.
Gas-fired combined-cycle technology is the overwhelming choice in these new
generating plants. Combined-cycle plants offer extremely high efficiency, clean
operation, low capital costs and shorter construction lead times. The efficiency of
combined-cycle units is now approaching 60 percent compared with roughly 34
percent efficiency for traditional boiler units regardless of the fuel source.
Higher efficiency means lower fuel bills and less pollution. For example, replacing
a coal generating unit with a gas-fired combined-cycle plant could eliminate sulfur
dioxide emissions (the primary cause of acid rain), cut carbon dioxide (the
principal greenhouse gas) by as much as two-thirds and cut nitrogen oxides (the
primary cause of smog) by as much as 95 percent. Also, not only is the lead time
for construction of a combined-cycle unit shorter than that of a new coal-fired
plant, but construction can be implemented in a modular fashion. Gas
consumption by central-station electricity generating plants will more than double
over the next 20 years; Gas consumption at central-station electricity generating
plants (including electric utility plants and independent power producers) is
currently at 3.3 quads per year.
P-21

Two 400-MW, 1+1 combined-cycles with

GT13E2 Gas Turbines CHP. Fuel: Natural
Gas-France

CHP plant with 2 X 7.3 MW Taurus 70 Gas

Turbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-Poland
P-22

261-MW, 3+1 combined-cycle CHP block

with SGT-800 Gas Turbines. Fuel: Natural
Gas-Sweden

98-MW, 1+1 combined-cycle block with

V64.3A Gas Turbine. Fuel: Natural Gas
Czech Republic
P-23

630-MW,
3+1
combined-cycle
desalination plant with GT13E2 Gas
Turbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-Bahrain

465-MW, 2+1 CCGT block with V94.2 Gas

Turbine. Fuel: Natural Gas-Belgium
P-24

780-MW, 3+1 combined-cycle with

W501FD Gas Turbines. Fuel: Natural
Gas-Brazil

146-MW, 2+1 combined-cycle with V64.3

Gas Turbine, 374-MW, 2+1 combinedcycle with V94.2 Gas Turbine. Fuel:
Natural Gas-Finland
P-25

Fueling the Future

Natural Gas & New Technologies for a Cleaner 21st Century" to address a paradox that
has bedevilled the world natural gas industry. How can a fuel that is abundant, safe
and reliable to deliver, more environmentally friendly than oil or coal, and nearly four
times as efficient as electricity from the point of origin to the point of use, power just a
very small portion of the worlds of the economy? This paradox is all the more puzzling
given the fact that it has been policy, as affirmed to encourage the broader use of
natural gas. "Fuelling the Future" both posits and proves that an energy policy
encouraging the use of natural gas has not been fully realized. It then outlines a
comprehensive strategy showing how fulfilling the potential of natural gas will help
the world meets its energy needs for the next 20 years. Specifically, it addresses the
questions of how much natural gas might be used and in what applications, as well as
what national benefits environmental, economic, conservation might result from
such increased use. In sum, "Fuelling the Future" offers the energy decision-makers,
from the leaders to the consumers, an alternative economic future in which an
affordable, efficient and readily available energy source powers,
new advanced
technologies for the betterment of all.
Key Points
Using natural gas in place of other energy sources provides multiple national and
consumer benefits. Substituting natural gas, primarily for electricity, coal and oil, help
ease a number of environmental concerns, including greenhouse gas emissions, acid
rain, smog, solid waste and water pollution In 2020.

P-26

PROJECT
MANAGEMENT

TECHNICAL EXPERTISE
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE

10

4
DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR

CDC

5
9
8
COMMUNITIES

COMMUNITIES

6
COMMUNITIES
P-27

Management Overview
The WES Project contemplates to the developments of new strategies that will permit an
ammonic socio-economic growth and balance, benefiting the provinces sub development in
Under-Developed and Developing Countries.
Enter which:
(1) Diversify the use and to increase the capacity of the system of interregional water, energy
and sewage infrastructures, distribution and services.
(2) Safeguard the mobilization of goods and services, that anticipate in the development plans of
the nation.
(3) Complementary, to optimize and to extend other ways of goods and services for the
development of tourism, small and medium industries; stimulating the development of intermodel systems
(4) Facilitate training and transfer of technology.
(5) Establish excellent socio-commercial relations, through the advance of technology and
multi-lateral benefits.
(6) Fortalice the interchanges of university students, with countries that provide advance
technology, in our given state of the arts.
(7) Implement projects to orient the improvement of public health, education, housing and
industries.
(8) Provide socio-economic developments programmes for young working adults.

P-28

THE WES PROJECT

The WES Project need leaders at all levels of the corporation that can bridge business
strategy and emerging technologies, identify opportunities for growth, profitability,
transform innovation into commercial success and promote leadership in technology
management and innovation.
In adjusting to a turbulent economy, many businesses follow a recession strategy that
results in reducing core technical competencies and cutting investment in innovation and
products development. We on the other hand will enhance our futures commitments by
focusing on increasing innovative activities in preparation for a global market rebound,
managing and dealing with risk and uncertainty, understanding how motivation,
innovation and uncertainty are interrelated.
Recognising and balancing the critical functions necessary for carrying out innovation,
designing managerial systems, including dual ladder, career assignment, evaluation,
reward, and recognition systems and developing critical skills for reducing products
development cycle time. Managing technology transfer, communication and
understanding the role of technical architecture by recognising the effectiveness of
alternative organisational structures including project, functional, and matrix-type
approaches.
P-29

PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
MERO INTERNATIONAL PROVIDE:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATE THE WES PROJECT
TRANSFER OF TECNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RESOURCES
TRAINING & STRATEGIES
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

P-30

TECHNICAL EXPERTISE
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE
JOINT VENTURES PROVIDE:
TECNHICAL EXPERTISES
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ADVISORS
TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUPPORT-CONSOLIDATE THE WES PROJECT
PROVIDE:
MATERIAL,
EQUIPMENT,
MACHINERY, SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE
P-31

CENTRE
DATA & COMMUNICATION

CDC
P-32

THE SCIENTIFIC FACTORS

The vital cycle of the system, are the factors that are more
influential than the affect of the result or that are more often
reside in the first place. On this point, the decisions are due and
base on the competent economic evaluation with the consideration
for suitable financing, socio-economic, the regulating business
atmosphere that it frequents, and the technological considerations.
In recent years, the importance of project development and social
progress in management, reflects the acceptance in several degrees
of the following elements: (1) the approach of management process,
(2) the mutual aid between management, science and technology are
decisive, (3) the approach of the behaviour of management, science
and technology for the development of human resource, (4)
sustainable competitive advantage, and (5) the economic evaluation
and the availability of finances.
P-33

THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS

t
Pr { T t } = P (i) ,

b
E [ T ] = t [ P (t) ]

u=0
Pr

= Project Risk

= Time Delivered

= Insecurity

= Requirement

= Time Scheduled

Pt

= Probability

= R + t, R = 0

t=a

P-34

MERO HOSPITAL
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

P-35

TRAINING
STRATEGIES
EDUCATIVE PROGRAMME

BOOKS
COURSES
SEMINARS

P-36

HOUSING
PRO-PANEL SYSTEM
MODERN TECHNOLOGY

20 Aos de Garanta

P-37

Investment Returns
After Project Completion
Yearly
Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Assets
Cash

46,063,043

53,975,570

71,783,443

75,823,156

83,773,461

Inventory

Accounts receivable

1,720,000

256,950

384,000

1,303,286

Total Current As se ts

47,783,043

53,975,570

72,040,393

76,207,156

85,076,747

Capital assets

2,425,000

23,857,070

19,570,656

20,572,656

18,573,657

Other fixed assets

7,000

14,000

484,000

546,000

612,000

Gross fixe d as se ts

2,432,000

23,871,070

20,054,656

21,118,656

19,185,657

Accum Depreciation and Amortization

1,400

197,089

1,298,960

1,604,877

1,914,094

Net fixe d ass e ts

2,430,600

23,673,981

18,755,696

19,513,779

17,271,563

TOTAL ASSETS

50,213,643

$ 53,793,247

$ 90,796,089

$ 95,720,935

$ 102,348,310

Liabilitie s
Accounts payable

1,518,333

2,875,026

3,579,408

3,888,301

3,975,000

Curre nt liabilities

1,518,333

2,875,026

3,579,408

3,888,301

3,975,000

Mortgage finance

1,795,000

3,649,134

4,266,470

4,873,655

Total Liabilities

1,518,333

4,670,026

7,228,542

8,154,771

8,848,655

Share Capital

35,850,000

36,250,000

36,575,000

53,125,000

58,575,000

Retained earnings

12,845,310

12,873,221

46,992,547

34,441,164

34,924,655

Total Equity

48,695,310

49,123,221

83,567,547

87,566,164

93,499,655

TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY

50,213,643

$ 53,793,247

$ 90,796,089

$ 95,720,935

$ 102,348,310

P-38

P-39

Cash Flow Projections

After Project Completion
YEARLY
Year 1
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS
Net Income (Loss)

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

5,975,310

8,850,750

10,746,926

18,530,750

23,018,189

Change in Working Capital

1,750,000

2,287,005

2,091,128

2,810,445

3,919,286

Plus Depreciation
Interest

$
$

5,750
-

$
$

195,689
-

1,101,871

305,917

309,217

177,160

705,600

700,525

7,731,060

11,333,444

14,117,087

22,352,712

27,947,217

2,432,000

31,039,070

53,816,415

62,000,000

76,585,750

2,432,000

31,039,070

53,816,415

62,000,000

76,585,750

Cash from Equity

25,000,000

$ (28,750,000) $

Cash from Debt Financing

22,847,600

(88,265) $

(93,340)

Net Cash Flow from Financing

25,000,000

22,847,600

$ (28,750,000) $

(88,265) $

(93,340)

Net Cash Flow

35,163,060

65,220,114

5,500,000

40,663,060

40,663,060

105,883,174

Net Cash Flow from Operations

CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENTS
Fixed Assets
Net Cash Flow from Inves tm ents
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING

Cash at Beginning of Period

CASH AT END OF PERIOD

84,264,448

104,439,627

$ 105,883,174

$ 145,066,675

229,331,123

$ 145,066,675

$ 229,331,123

333,770,750

39,183,502

P-40

CONCLUSIVE SUMMARY
This presentation treats in great details issues and factors which will influence
the investment in The WES Project as a Humanitarian Programme; at a sum of
55,987,257,650, to build Water-Energy-Sewerage Infrastructure for Under-Developed
and Developing Countries.
The project comprise of water, alternative energy and sewerage infrastructure, housing
facilities, employment, public services, schools, hospitals, roads, bridges, tourism, heavy,
medium and light manufacturing facilities, training centre, kinder facilities and other
amenities to enhance the state of the arts of The WES Project.
A favourable decision would take into consideration the following factors:
There are five major advantages to The WES Project, which allows due
consideration to investor(s) for immediate development.
Government Multi-Purpose Development
Privileged locations which will lead to natural increase in value over time
Tourist developments surrounded by untouched, nature, beaches, rivers, lakes and water
falls; providing ample opportunity for water activities and also an unparalleled level of
enjoyment.
Multiple access and transport communication, endow a window into the world
of
industries; revealing the many opportunities for international companies to enhance
market value.
Global, national and regional trends will indicate that The WES Project could
realize substantial growth as a result of the imminent approval of international business
atmosphere.
In accordance to the examples of financial benefits included in this report, the developer
has the opportunity to build infrastructures for the benefits of humanity, unmatched on
a per capita basic. The world is now showing that the existing political and social
stability will herald a comprehensive and coherent economic advantages, should we all
work together. The WES Project will enhance a global opportunity to help make the
world a better place by being a part and partaking with global responsibility to
provide technical assistance, transfer of technology, and social development to for the
improvement of better living conditions.

P-41

CONCLUSION
The consolidation of this system, would be to develop and implement a
socio-economic matrix of lineaments in technology transfer, which would
bring changes in the paradigm of public services with private
participation, that will lend a united presents in most countries.
This would allow the indexing of technology, resources and training in a
plan of actions, that would bring benefits to the communities, organised
by the municipal authorities, states and central government; that
fortified and satisfied the improvement public services.
In this sense we could say, that the new form to manage and to plan
programmes would generate socio-economic and political changes for the
benefit of the Citizenship. In order to conclude this system, we need to
make it work as an in-house matrix, that would accumulate all the data
of public services, through a satellite communication network, which
would provide statistics and effective communication to the municipality
to guarantee the permanence of registries and pursuit of data, that would
allow the taking of suitable actions.
P-42

We named the movement The Century of Humanity

founded on the principle of our work; which created
facilitation and promotion of divinity, humanitarian
activities and social awareness to societies, to improve healthcare,
housing, better living, and abject extreme poverty situation of
vulnerable human beings.
Throughout the world, in countries rich and poor, there are people that
have no or little access neither to basic physical, housing and
healthcare nor to immunizations from infectious disease. Some people
have no access because they lack the resources to buy and the state
does not provide it. Others may be able to afford healthcare but
because there are no services available in their communities they must
do without it. In some countries because of discrimination or social
stigmas such as a persons status as a prisoner, refugee, immigrant or
a member of a lower class or caste they are deprived of this basic
human right. Our belief is that all people should have access to
affordable universal healthcare, housing and better living conditions.
In a world of such wealth and abundance, rights and freedoms, there is
no justification for an individual to be without divinity, healthcare and
proper living conditions.

MERO INTERNATIONAL
Entity

Charitable, International Non-Governmental Organisation, Non-Profit

MedicineEmergencyResearchOceanographic Studies Socio-Economic Dev

Project

The WES Project

Authorized Person Mervyn Maastricht Carl McYearwood

Title
Chairman
Skype Contacts

Email

MEROINTERNATIONAL
DENTBLANCHE1
DBBANCORP
OSBFM-LLC
MMCM_1
merointernational@yahoo.com,web.de,usa.com

Inceptions

1959, 1971, 1982, 1991, 1994, 2000

Federal Registration H-99-0371561, CAC-02498533-96, ITC47-VOLO359DG

J-30688935-3, NIT 0131693141
P-43

MEROINTERNATIONAL@WEB.DE,MEROINTERNATIONAL@YAHOO.COM
McYEARWOOD_MMC@YAHOO.COM,McYEARWOOD_MMC@USA.COM

THANK YOU

P-45

NOTES
THE WES PROJECT

P-46

NOTES
THE WES PROJECT

P-47