Professional Documents
Culture Documents
...Appellant
Versus
...Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. BANUMATHI, J.
Leave granted.
2.
was
in
financial
crisis,
the
2
Page2
on
on
on
on
on
on
16.01.2010;
24.04.2010;
15.09.2010;
01.11.2010;
12.02.2011 and
19.08.2011
The
respondent-landlord
alleges
that
under
Delhi.
During
the
pendency
of
the
suit,
an
i.e.
16.10.2014,
the
learned
counsel
for
the
listed
for
24.10.2014..
On
27.10.2014,
the
Learned
counsel
for
the
appellant-tenant
condition
that
in
the
event
of
the
Per
contra,
learned
counsel
for
the
9.
make such order show that the power under Order XII
Rule 6 CPC is discretionary and cannot be claimed as a
matter of right. Judgment on admission is not a matter of
right and rather is a matter of discretion of the Court. Where
the defendants have raised objections which go to the root of
the case, it would not be appropriate to exercise the
discretion under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The said rule is an
enabling provision which confers discretion on the Court in
delivering a quick judgment on admission and to the extent
of the claim admitted by one of the parties of his opponents
claim.
In
the
respondent-landlord,
suit
for
eviction
appellant-tenant
filed
has
by
the
admitted
the
pay
Rs.1,00,000/-
per
month
to
the
shall
issue
necessary
9
Page9