Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fall 2014
Written Assignment
a) How can regime theory and social constructivist theory (for instance
securitization) illuminate the refugee regime and what are the main
components of this regime?
b) Discuss Humanitarianism from a critical perspective. Include a
discussion of humanitarianism as a political process and link to a
discussion about humanitarian aid
You must answer both questions.
a) How can regime theory and social constructivist theory (for instance
securitization) illuminate the refugee regime and what are the main
components of this regime?
More than 51 million people are today forcibly displaced worldwide,
according to UNHCRs 2013 Global Trends Report, with around 11 million
refugees under the direct mandate of UNHCR, an increase of more than 1
million refugees since 2012. (UNHCR Global Trends Report 2013) The
increased number of refugees is the greatest number of refugees
registered in post-World War II era. (UNHCR 2014a) The international
community has therefore established international cooperation that seeks
to minimalize the negative consequences that might be the outcome of
having so many refugees around the world.
During the past 50-60 years, a new form of global regime has developed
in order to handle the great numbers of refugees that have been created
because of conflicts in several countries. The refugee regime, which
1
this might affect countries to adopt a more layoff position and wait for
other countries to do the job in providing the goods. It is therefore of great
importance that there is an international cooperation that ensures all
countries work together towards securing global public goods as what
happened with the creation of the vaccine against HIV/AIDS or in the fight
against Ebola in West Africa at the moment. (Betts, 2009:81)
Betts argues that refugees can be seen as global (or regional) public
goods, as ensuring them the necessary protection can benefit several
states at the same time, although these states arent directly involved in
the process of ensuring the refugees protection. The international
cooperation has therefore established a refugee regime that is responsible
for providing the necessary help for refugees fleeing from conflicts.
According to Stephen Krasner, a notable international relations professor,
a regime can be defined as being norms, rules, principles and decisionmaking procedures that regulate actor behavior in a given issue area
(Betts 2009:37). The refugee regime has, throughout history, been
supplemented by series of regional and international organizations
(mainly UNHCR but also ICRC, OAU and others) and agreements
(Convention on the Status of the Refugee, Cartagena Declaration in Latin
America, the 2006 European Council Directive etc.) that all have had an
impact on the evolution of the refuge regime. (Betts, 2009:6) In order to
understand what refugee regime entitles we need to observe it from an
international relations perspective.
According to Betts, and observed from an IR perspective, regime theory is
the area that focuses on the coordination between regimes on an
international level and with the providing of global public goods. It
examines the different roles of regimes and how they overcome
collaboration and cooperation problems and end up facilitating an
international cooperation. (Betts, 2009:81) Betts adds that refugee
protection is governed by international regimes, and therefore has
significant relevance for the refugee regime in terms of finding out what
refugee regime components as UNHCR can do to facilitate mutual
3
beneficial
international
cooperation
between
states
that
can
Betts argues that the refugee regime has come to stay as states are
creating new forms of cooperation to address new challenges arising.
Challenges that the refugee regime cannot handle alone, which is why
states are developing international cooperation, signing agreements and
having discussions on how to solve these challenges. This has resulted in
the creation of new regimes for instance the human rights regime, IDP
regime etc. that all in some degree overlap the refugee regime. (Betts,
2009: 110, 122-123)
Nevertheless, the migration flows and the increased refugees in various
parts of the world have sparked a discussion about what Ole Wver calls
societal security meaning that a given society can preserve its unique
characteristics, like identity and culture, without the interference of
changes or threats coming from outside the national borders. In the recent
years, the refugee regime has come under heavy criticism regarding
receiving refugees in European countries, one of them being Denmark.
Critics often talk about defending our values and our society from the
threats imposed by refugees and immigrants who arrive to Denmark.
(Wver, 2010:13)
One of the best examples, is the Danish Peoples Party that states that it
is the Danes right and duty to preserve, defend and pass on the
essential values on which our society is built on and We will defend and
strengthen the Danish values that make up a condition for Denmark being
able to exist as a free country () (Danish Peoples Party webpage).
Immigrants can therefore be seen as a potential threat to the state.
Wver argues that situations where groups within a society feel
threatened and feel that their identity is being exposed to danger by lets
say immigrants, and where they try to defend themselves, are increasing.
With the continuous internationalization, it is getting more difficult for a
Danish national to oppose these threats, even on a national level, as
decisions on border control and asylum policies are being centralized in
Brussels. (Wver, 2010:14) He therefore claims that the only way to fight
the threats against ones identity is by strengthening existing identities
5
and thus culture becomes a security policy. (Wver, 2010:14-15) This can
be used to explain why there is a tendency of producing us-them
concepts, which can be related to us wanting to hold on to our culture and
identity, as stated in the The Danish Peoples Party example, and this
might explain why the refugee question is, once again, one of the main
topics in the Danish (political and social) debate.
Refugees have always been a central part of politics because, as Betts
states, the migration flows affect several countries at the same time, but
also
because
international
institutions
and
international
amount of money used on the worlds poor. The following will look more
into the criticism and how it can be related to the ongoing political debate
in Denmark.
Humanitarianism has for decades been criticized for being political and for
compromising refugee protection in order to secure state interests.
Jennifer Hyndman argues that humanitarian assistance is synonymous
with neither protection, in the legal sense, nor solutions to displacement
(Hyndman, 2000: 4). When looking at humanitarianism, in a post-Cold War
era, it developed to become increasingly well-funded and politicized
process of balancing the needs of refugees and other displaced persons
against the interests of states. (Hyndman, 2000:3) Nevertheless, critics
say that humanitarianism has moved to become an apparatus that fulfills
certain political functions (Agier, 2010:42), and no longer works towards
moral functions. Agier claims that the need of having control is one of
the reasons why humanitarianism has become a form of policing, which
can be observed in the discourse dealing with refugees and migrants. Fear
has taken over when talking about the global South, and these ex-colonies
now have the chance to be politically visible, which keeps fueling the
domination of the Western world over these countries. (Agier, 2010:30)
The West tries to contain the problems found in the global South so that
they stay where they are, including the migration flows that come from
areas that are unstable politically, socially, economically and ecologically.
Agier refers to Jonathan Benthal who explains this phenomenon as being
the North sending humanitarian aid into the South while the South repays
by sending unwanted migration flows towards the North. (Agier, 2010:30)
The unwillingness to accept refugees can also be seen in the Danish
debate. In fact, the past two weeks have shown a major change in the
discourse and rhetoric used to describe refugees and migrants who are
fleeing conflicts and aim at applying for asylum in Denmark. It started
with the Danish Peoples Party who presented a proposal on sending all
asylum seekers in Denmark to countries located near their places of
origin. Denmark should thereafter establish local refugee camps run by
7
Alliance went out and supported the idea. The party leader Anders
Samuelsen stated that asylum seekers should be turned around at the
airport, on a plane and into a refugee camp near where they came from"
(Jyllands-Posten, 2014a) The same response was observed by opposition
leading party Venstre whereas ruling party, the Social Democrats called
refugees unwelcomed.
This discourse is somehow understandable. It reflects what the population
finds preferable. A recent poll amongst Danish voters showed that nearly
60 % of the population support the idea of creating Danish camps in
neighboring countries while 68 % support further restrictions on asylum
procedures (Jyllands-Posten, 2014b). The Danish humanitarian aid is thus
reflected by what the public sees desirable and not necessary by what is
needed. According to Hyndman, the popularity and the sympathy people
in the West have for migrants depends on where they are in the world. As
soon as they approach the western countries borders, the migrants turn
into immigrants and foreigners. As long as they and their tragedy are
far away, it is not a problem. (Hyndman, 2000:27)
Preventive protection is a relative new term that has emerged in
development studies and represents a paradigm shift when it comes to
refugee policy. It supports the discourse of having the right to stay in the
country of origin rather than the previous dominant belief of having the
right
to
leave.
(Hyndman,
2000:
17)
UNHCR
defined
preventive
10
Literature:
Articles:
Danish Peoples Party Webpage. Arbejdsprogram URL:
http://www.danskfolkeparti.dk/Arbejdsprogram_-_Dansk_Folkepartis_v
%C3%A6rdier_-_et_endnu_bedre_Danmark
Jyllands-Posten, 2014a, Liberal Alliance: Afvis alle krigsflygtninge
Marchen Neel Gjertsen, 08.10.14 URL: http://jyllandsposten.dk/politik/ECE7093609/Liberal-Alliance-Afvis-alle-krigsflygtninge/
Jyllands-Posten, 2014b, Danskerne er parate til strammere asylregler
Orla Borg, 10.10.14 URL: http://jyllandsposten.dk/politik/ECE7100711/Danskerne-er-parate-til-strammereasylregler/
Politiken, Dansk ulandsbistand ligger fortsat i top 5 Kenneth Lund,
08.04.14 URL: http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/ECE2258080/danskulandsbistand-ligger-fortsat-i-top-5/
UNHCR 2014a URL: http://www.unhcr.org/53a155bc6.html
Books:
Agier, Michel Humanity as an Identity and Its Political Effects (A Note on
Camps and Humanitarian Government) Volume 1, Number 1, Fall 2010
Published by University of Pennsylvania Press. Compendium for Global
Refugee Studies Fall 2014 Theories of International Relations
Betts, Alexander Forced Migration and Global Politics, Wiley-Blackwell,
2009
Hyndman, Jennifer Managing Displacement: Refugees and the Politics of
Humanitarianism, Borderlines, Volume 16, 2000, University of Minnesota
Press, Minneapolis, London. Compendium for Global Refugee Studies Fall
2014 Theories of International Relations
Wver, Ole 3. Securitization and Desecuritization found in the book On
security by Ronnie D. Lipschutz. Compendium for Global Refugee Studies
Fall 2014 Theories of International Relations
Reports:
UNHCR 2014b, Syria Regional Response Plan 2014 - URL:
http://www.unhcr.org/syriarrp6/docs/syria-rrp6-lebanon-response-plan.pdf
UNHCR Global Trends Report 2013 - URL:
http://www.unhcr.org/5399a14f9.html#_ga=1.28899260.149543448.1413
903438
11