Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: K. S. Parihar & Sunita S. Patil (2010): Thermoelastic Problems of Thin Circular and Rectangular Plates,
Journal of Thermal Stresses, 33:10, 907-924
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01495739.2010.510689
INTRODUCTION
Roy Choudhury [1] determined quasi-static thermal stresses in a thin circular
plate subjected to transient temperature applied along the circumference of a circle
over the upper face with lower face at zero temperature and the xed circular edge
thermally insulated. Such types of problems (see also [24]) are of great importance
for engineering applications. For instance, they make it possible to determine the
state of stress in circular plates constituting foundations of containers for hot gases
or liquid, in foundations for furnaces etc., in other words in all cases in which either
temperature or heat ux is given on the planes bounding the plate.
Ishihara et al. [5] studied the heat conduction problem to determine the
temperature distribution and discuss the thermoelastic deformation in thin circular
plates subjected to partially distributed and axisymmetric heat supply on the
outer curved surface. Navlekar and Khobragade [6] studied the direct steady-state
and transient thermoelastic problem to determine the temperature, displacement
and stress functions of a thin circular plate of thickness h occupying the space
D 0 r a, 0 z h with the known boundary conditions. The nite Hankel
and Laplace transform techniques are used to nd the solution of the problem.
Received 30 June 2009; accepted 20 April 2010.
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee for several helpful suggestions.
Address correspondence to K. S. Parihar, SSBTs College of Engineering & Technology,
Bambhori, Jalgaon 425001, India. E-mail: dr.kailash_parihar@rediffmail.com
907
908
(3)
while zero temperature is maintained on outer curved surface of the thin circular
plate; that is,
Ta z t = 0
(4)
The boundary conditions (1), (2), (4) and the initial condition (3) suggest that the
circular plate is subject to axisymmetric heating.
The differential equation governing the displacement function Ur z t as in
Nowacki ([4], Chap.1) is
1 U
2 U
= 1 + at T
+
r 2
r r
(5)
where and at are Poissons ratio and the linear coefcient of thermal expansion of
the material of the plate, respectively, and
Ua z t = 0
(6)
1 U
2 U
= 2 2
r r
r
(7)
909
where is the Lame constant, while each of the stress functions rz zz z are zero
within the plate in the plane state of stress. Also, it follows from (5) and (7) that
= 2 1 + at T rr
(8)
(9)
where k is the thermal diffusivity of the material of the plate. Equations (1)(7) and
(9) constitute the formulation of the problem under consideration.
Let
T denote the nite Hankel transform of T with respect to the variable r
and let T denote the Laplace transform of T with respect to the variable t, then we
have
a
T n z s =
est dt
rTr z t J0 n rdr
(10)
0
T n z s + T n z s
= f n s
dz
z=h
(11)
(12)
(13)
910
d
T n z s +
= g n s
T n z s
dz
z=0
(14)
(15)
We use the principle of superposition and split the problem into the following two
problems:
(16)
sinhqz q coshqz
1 q 2 sinhqh
(17)
sinhqz q coshqz
1 q 2 sinhqh
(18)
(19)
that is when
s = k
n2
m
h
2
2
= mn
(suppose)
(20)
and when
s = kn2 1 = n2 (suppose)
(21)
2
s= mn
2k
2
1m+1 Bm ze mn t
h
(22)
Bm z =
h
m
mz
sin
1+
cos
h
2
Re s est G n z s =
s=n2
911
mz
h
(23)
m
kez n2 t
e
sinhh
(24)
2
s = mn
m = 1 2 and s = n2
(25)
Taking the inverse nite Hankel transform and the inverse Laplace transform
in (17) and using the convolution theorem of Laplace transform together with
equations (18)(25) we can write
Tf r z t = T1 r z t + T2 r z t
T1 r z t =
J0 n r
4k
1m+1 Bm zAmn t
a2 h n=1 J12 n a m=1
(26)
(27)
f n t =
T2 r z t =
2
f n t e mn tt dt
(28)
a
0
J0 n r t
2kez
2
f n t en tt dt
a2 sinhh n=1 J12 n a 0
(29)
(30)
e
fn t dt
Amn t = 2 f n t f n 0e
mn
t
0
(31)
which is obtained from (28) by carrying out an integration by parts. The form (31)
is more suitable when we want to differentiate the series in (27) term by term.
The solution of Problem 1 was attempted earlier in [6]. Due to erroneous
inverse Laplace transform, the solution in [6] differs from
the hone2 given by (26)
(30)
on
two
counts.
In
[6],
T
r
z
t
0
and
the
factor
1 + m is replaced by
2
h 2
m 1 n2 in T1 r z t given by (27)(29) together with (23). To ensure that the
solution given above by (26)(30) is the correct solution, we carry out the following
verications.
912
Using (27), (23) and (31) while carrying out term-by-term differentiation of the
series in (27) we can show that
4
2 T1
1 T1
2 T1
f n tJ0 n r
1 T1
=
1m+1 Bm z
+
+
k t
r 2
r r
z2
a2 h n=1
J12 n a
m=1
a2
2ez
sinhh
f n t J0 n r
J12 n a
n=1
(32)
where we have obtained the last step by using the Fourier series expansion
sinhz =
m1m+1 sin mz
2
h
sinhh
2 + m 2
h2
m=1
h
(33)
+
=
2
2
2
r
r r
z
k t
a sinhh n=1
J12 n a
(34)
Thus using (26), (32) and (34) we nd that T = Tf satises the differential
equation (9).
Also, using (27) and (31) we nd
T1 r z t +
J0 n rf n t sinhn z
2
T1 r z t = 2
z
a n=1
J12 n a sinhn h
m1m+1 sin mz
J0 n r
4k
h
2
a2 h2 n=1 J1 n a m=1 k 2 + m
2
n
t
2 t
2 tt
mn
mn
f n 0e
f n t dt
+
e
t
0
(35)
where we have made use of (33) with = n . From (35) we now have
J0 n rf n t
2
= fr t
= 2
T1 r z t + T1 r z t
z
a n=1
J12 n a
z=h
T1 r z t
=0
T1 r z t +
z
z=0
(36)
(37)
(38)
It follows from (26) and (36)(38) that T = Tf satises the conditions (1)(2) with
gr t 0. Finally, it is a simple matter to verify that the solution T = Tf satises
the conditions (3) and (4). Thus, it is veried that the solution T = Tf of Problem 1
913
given by (26)(30) satises the differential equation (9), the initial condition (3) and
the boundary conditions (1)(2), and (4) with gr t 0.
DETERMINATION OF DISPLACEMENT AND STRESS FUNCTIONS
The solutions of Problem 1 given by (26)(30) is of the form
Tr z t = Tf r z t =
En z t J0 n r
(39)
n=1
Ur z t = 1 + at
En z tJ0 n r
n2
n=1
(40)
(41)
En z t J0 n r n r1 J1 n r
(42)
n=1
n=1
The expression for given by equation (42) may be obtained also by using (39),
(41) and (8).
A SPECIAL CASE OF PROBLEM 1
The function fr t in Problem 1, introduced through the boundary condition
(1), can be arbitrarily prescribed. As in [6] we take
fr t = 1 et r 2 raH H = h3 + 5h2 + 4h
(43)
For this choice of fr t we can get the corresponding results for the steady-state
case discussed separately in [6]. Substituting fr t from (43) into (27)(30) we get
J0 n r a
4kH
4
J
xdx
J
a
ah n=1 n2 J12 n a 0 0 n
n 1 n
1m+1 Bm z
2 t
t
mn
2
1
+
e
1/
mn
2 1
mn
m=1
J0 n r a
2kHez
4
T2 r z t =
J xdx J1 n a
a sinhh n=1 n2 J12 n a 0 0 n
n
2
n2 11 1 et + en t 1/n2
T1 r z t =
(44)
(45)
2
where Bm z mn
and n2 are given by (23), (20) and (21). Thus the temperature
T = Tf is given by (26), (44) and (45).
914
Figure 1 Variation of
T = Tf r z t/ given by Eqs. (26), (44)(45) and (50) with z for t = 1 and
r = 05, 1.0, 1.5. The values of constants are a = 2, h = 1, k = 086.
(46)
where we have used partial fractions and the Fourier series expansion (33) for
= 1 and = n . For the special case (43), let Tf 0 r z denote the limiting value of
Tf r z t as t then using (26) and (44)(46) we get
J0 n r sinhn z n coshn z
a
2H
4
Tf 0 r z =
J0 n xdx J1 n a
a n=1 n2 1 n2 J12 n a sinhn h
n
0
(47)
The expression for the steady-state temperature Tf 0 r z has been given in [6] as
F n J0 n r sinhn z n coshn z
2
2
a n=1
1 n2 J12 n a sinhn h
a
F n =
rFrJ0 n rdr Fr = r 2 raH
Tf 0 r z =
(48)
(49)
It is easily veried that Tf 0 r z given by (48)(49) reduces to that given by (47) on
simplication.
Returning to the transient case set
= 4 kah2 H1
(50)
Numerical results are obtained for the temperature Tf r z t/ given by (26), (44),
(45) and (50). The variation of Tf r z t/ with z is shown in Figure 1 for
t = 1 a = 2 and r = 05 10 and 15.
915
While carrying out the numerical work, it is observed that the contribution
of T2 dominates over that of T1 . It is evident from (39) and (41) that the
expressions for 2 1 + at
1 rr and 2 1 + at
1 may be obtained from the
temperature expression Tf given by (26), (44), and
(45) simply by replacing J0 n r
by n r1 J1 n r and n r1 J1 n r J0 n r , respectively. The variations of
2 1 + at
1 rr and 2 1 + at
1 with z are shown in Figures 2 and 3,
respectively.
(51)
Comparing (51) with (17) we nd that the expression for Tg can be obtained from
that of Tf by replacing z by z h and f n s by g n s. Therefore, we can
write the solution of Problem 2 at once using (26)(30). Thus we have
Tg r z t = T3 r z t + T4 r z t
J0 n r
4k
1m+1 Bm z hDmn t
a2 h n=1 J12 n a m=1
t
2
Dmn t = g n t e mn tt dt
T3 r z t =
g n t =
(52)
(53)
(54)
a
0
(55)
Figure 2 Variation of rr = 2 1 + at
1 rr r z t with z for t = 1. The expression for rr is
obtained form
T in Figure 1 simply by replacing Jo n r by n r1 J1 n r. The values of r and various
constants are the same as in Figure 1.
916
Figure 3 Variation of = 2 1 + at
1 r z t with z for t = 1. It follows from Eq. (8) that
T rr and so no new calculations are required for . The values of r and various constants
=
are the same as in Figures 12.
T4 r z t =
2k
a2
ezh
J0 n r t
2
g n t en tt dt
sinhh n=1 J12 n a 0
(56)
where Bm z mn and n are given by (23), (20) and (21) in which n are the
positive roots of the transcendental equation (15). The solution of Problem 2 was
attempted earlier in [7]. Due to erroneous inverse Laplace transform the solution in
[7] differs from
the one
In [7], T4 r z t 0 and
given by (52)(56)
h 2on two2 counts.
h 2
is replaced by m
1 n in T3 r z t given by (53)(55)
the factor 1 + m
together with (23). Since we have deduced the solution of Problem 2 from that of
Problem 1, the solution of Problem 2 given by (52)(56) is the correct solution and
no verication is called for.
Also, the analysis of relationships among the temperature, displacement and
stress functions carried out previously for Problem 1 can be extended verbatim
to Problem 2. Thus the expressions for 2 1 + at
1 rr and 2 1 + at
1
may be obtained from the temperature expression
Tg given by (52)(56)
simply by
replacing J0 n r by n r1 J1 n r and n r1 J1 n r J0 n r , respectively.
(57)
With this choice we can get results for a steady-state case studied separately in [7].
From (16), (26) and (52) we have
Tr z t = T1 r z t + T2 r z t + T3 r z t + T4 r z t
(58)
917
where Ti i = 1 2 3 4 are given by (27)(30), (53)(56) and (57). The special case
(57) satises the condition fr t eh gr t. Then, it follows from (30) and (56) that
T2 r z t + T4 r z t 0
(59)
(60)
2
2
mn
mn
m=1
m=1
zh
h
e
=
2k1 n2 sinhh
sinh n z h
n cosh n z h
sinhn h
(61)
We have deduced the above result from the series (46). If we denote by T0 r z the
limiting value of Tr z t as t and make use of the relations (60)(61) and (46)
we get
T0 r z =
1
8
3 1 n2 J1 n a sinhn h J0 n r
a n=1 n
eh sinhn z n coshn z
sinhn z h
n coshn z h
(62)
The expression for the steady-state temperature T0 r z has been given in [7] as
F0 n sinhn z
coshn z J0 n r
2
T0 r z = 2
n
a n=1 1 n2 sinhn h
sinhn h J12 n a
G0 n sinh n z h
cosh n z h
J0 n r
2
(63)
2
n
a n=1 1 n2
sinhn h
sinhn h
J12 n a
a
a
F0 n =
rF0 rJ0 n rdr
G0 n =
rG0 rJ0 n rdr
(64)
0
(65)
It is easily veried that T0 r z given by (63)(65) reduces to that given by (62) on
simplication.
918
Figure 4 Variation of T = Tr z t/ given by Eqs. (60) and (66) with z for t = 1 and r = 05, 1.0,
1.5. The values of constants are a = 2, h = 1 and k = 086
Returning to the transient case the variation of Tr z t/ with z is shown
in Figure 4 for t = 1 a = 2 and r = 05 10 and 15, where
= 16k/ah2
(66)
(67)
is employed.
obtained from T in Figure 4 simply by replacing Jo n r by n r1 J1 n r. While calculating rr
for
r = 0 the limit formula (67) is used for z = 00 05, 1.0. The values of constants are the same as in
Figure 4.
919
E y2
x2
1 2 U
2 U
uy =
+
T
dy
E x2
y2
ux =
(68)
(69)
where and are the Poisson ratio and the linear coefcient of thermal expansion of
the material of the plate, respectively, and Ux y is the Airy stress function, which
satises the relation
2
2
2
2
2
T
(70)
+
U
=
E
+
x2
y2
x2
y2
where E is Youngs modulus of elasticity and T is the temperature of the plate (see
[9, 10]). The temperature T satises the differential equation
2 T
2 T
1 T
+
=
x2
y2
k t
(71)
Tx y 0 = 0
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
where 0 < < a k is the thermal diffusivity of the material of the plate and k1 k2
are the radiation constants on the two edges y = b b of the rectangular plate. The
stress components in terms of U are given by
xx =
2 U
2 U
2 U
yy =
xy =
2
2
y
x
xy
(77)
920
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
fyPn ydy
f an
P y
An n
n=1
(84)
where
An =
sin2an b
2an
(85)
Now consider
b
b
2 T
T
P
ydy
=
y
TP
y
+
TPn ydy
P
n
y2 n
y n
b
b
T
= Pn b k1
+T
y
y=b
b
T
+ Pn b k2
a2n
TPn ydy
+T
y
b
y=b
(86)
921
where we have made use of the integration by parts and the relations (80)(81).
Making use of the conditions (74)(75), equation (86) reduces to
b
b
b
2 T
2
P
ydy
=
a
TPn ydy
n
y2 n
b
(87)
T x an s +
T x an s
= h an s
dx
x=0
d
T x an s +
T x an s
= f an s
dx
x=
(88)
(89)
(90)
The solution of the differential equation (88) satisfying the conditions (89)(90) may
be written
T x an s = f an s
sinh qx q cosh qx
1 q 2 sinh q
h an s
(91)
This form of solution is similar to the one given by (17) and (51). Therefore the
solution of the problem stated by (71)(76) may at once be written as
Tx y t = T5 x y t + T6 x y t + T7 x y t + T8 x y t
t
Pn y
2k
2
T5 x y t =
1m+1 Dm x f an t emn tt dt
n=1 An m=1
0
x
t
Pn y
ke
2
T6 x y t =
f an t en tt dt
sinh n=1 An 0
t
2k
Pn y
n t e2mn tt dt
T7 x y t =
Dm x ha
n=1 An m=1
0
kex Pn y t
2
T8 x y t =
han t en tt dt
sinh n=1 An 0
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
m
cos mx
sin mx
2
1 + m
(97)
922
2mn
=k
f an t =
a2n
b
b
m
2
2n = ka2n 1
n t =
fy tPn ydy
ha
(98)
b
b
(99)
The constants an are the positive zeros of the transcendental equation (82).
The solution of the rectangular plate problem was attempted earlier in [10].
Due to erroneous inverse Laplace transform, the solution in [10] differs from the
one given by (92)(99) on four counts.
In [10], T6 x y t 0, T8 x y t 0 and Dm x in T5 x y t and T7 x y t is
replaced by Lm x given by
m
mx
mx
Lm x =
sin
m
cos
(100)
1 m2
Substituting Tx y t from (92)(96) into (70) we can nd the Airy stress function
Ux y t. Indeed, we have
Ux y t = kE U5 x y t + U6 x y t + U7 x y t + U8 x y t
(101)
(102)
With this choice we can get the results for the steady-state case studied separately
in [9]. The expressions in (102) satisfy the condition fy t e hy t. When this
condition is used in (94) and (96) together with (99) we get
T6 x y t + T8 x y t 0
Then using (92)(93), (95) and (102) we nd
1 + 1m+1 e
2k
Mn Pn y
Tx y t =
Dm x
n=1
An
2mn 1
n=1
2
1 et + emn t 1/2mn
Mn =
(103)
(104)
16k1 + k2 cosan b
3 an b2 sinan b 3an b cosan b (105)
4
an
923
where An n and mn are given by (85), (79) and (98). The function Pn y is given
by (78) where an are the positive zeros of the transcendental equation (82).
In the limiting case as t we encounter the series
x
1m+1 Dm x
e
sinh an x an cosh an x
+
=
2mn
2k1 a2n sinh
sinh an
m=1
(106)
where Dm x is given by (97). Like the series in (46), the above series has been
evaluated using partial fractions and the Fourier series expansion (33). Also,
replacing x by x we can get a result similar to that of (61). Using these series
and taking the limit as t in (104) we get
T0 x y =
1
1 a2n An sinh an Mn Pn y
n=1
e sinh an x an cosh an x sinh an x an cosh an x
(107)
where T0 x y
denotes the limiting value of Tx y t as t . The steady-state
case has been studied in [9] with = a. It is shown in [9] that
T0 x y
a =
F0 an Pn y sinh an x an cosh an x
F0 an =
G0 an Pn y sinh an x a an cosh an x a
(108)
1 a2n An
sinh an a
sinh an a
n=1
b
b
F0 yPn ydy
G0 an =
G0 yPn ydy
(109)
(110)
(111)
Thus T0 x y
a given by (108) and (111) is the same as the one given by (107) with
= a.
Returning to the transient case, we set
k1 = 1 k2 = 0 b = 1 an =
1
x
2 n
(112)
(113)
924
Figure 6 Variation of
T = Ta y t/ with y for t = 1 10. The expressions for Ta y t and are
given by Eqs. (104)(105) and (114). The values of constants are k1 = 1 k2 = 0 b = 1 a = 2 = 15
and k = 086.
(114)