Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Presentation 12.2
Presentation 12.3
Presentation 12.4
Conclusion
Comparison of the methods
To test a comparable GIS Substation, Siemens
T&D used to require twice as much time and more
than twice the staff before. The new system allows
not only that one person alone can now do this
test, but the whole process is significantly faster.
The new method is also considered superior in
terms of safety, environmental friendliness, and the
risks involved. Modification work related with SF6
Gas filling and evacuation is no longer needed just
to perform the tests. Also a crane necessary before
is no longer required. Yet perhaps the most
important benefit is that the system remains
sealed, as the transformers are already preinstalled in the factory. This eliminates the risk of
dust getting into the system.
The slightly higher costs of the transformer are
easily compensated by the many advantages it
offers. The old method also required a great deal
of space to be allocated for the test equipment
during construction of the building, which also had
an effect on costs. None of this is necessary with
the new approach; the testing device can simply
be positioned directly in front of the busbar.
Looking ahead
SIEMENS is already planning further applications
with the CPC 100 and CP RC in other countries.
To make the modular system even more versatile,
collaborative work has also begun on further
improvements.
Consideration has even been given to a business
idea in a completely different field; using the CPC
100 with CP RC in the service business to maintain
worldwide parks with aging systems installed.
Literature
[1]
[2]
Presentation 12.5