Professional Documents
Culture Documents
58
ZAMI"
The success and mathematical simplicity of LoEwY's work give strong encouragement to other similar unsteady-flow investigations. The present paper
undertakes to review two such, which were carried out incidentally to a broad
program of research on helicopter vibrations at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. One, a two-dimensional study of ground effect on an oscillating
rotor blade, is described in section 3. The other a first and rather unwieldy
attempt to predict unsteady three-dimensional loading of a blade in simple
harmonic motion by analogy with REISSNER'S theory [12] of oscillating wings,
is covered in section 4. By way of introduction to the important influence of
unsteady effects, section 2 discusses the comparison between two-dimensional
calculations and measurements of the forced response of a simplified rotor
model.
Principal Symbols
a
b'
bo
C(k) = F + i G
C ' = F ' + iG'
CF.D.
Cp.D.
h' = 2 ~z u/Y2
n'o
H~'I
i = ]/-- 1
In, ]n, K~
k = w b'/V = m/r
t
ko
L,
m = ~o/Y2
n
P
r
t
U
V=~r
W,#
X', ~1
x,~,z,~
Y
Zm
r
F
/,,
0,~o
~,$
0)
(L~z
{0 0
.c2
a
n
( )("/
(-)
59
Strip Theory
In a recently issued report [11, one of the present authors and co-workers
describe an extensive study of the dynamic response of a helicopter rotor subjected to several types of forcing. The determination and mathematical description of the airloads, both steady and unsteady, was based on the wellknown strip-theory approach, in which the flow at any given blade station is
assumed unaffected by that at any other station. The application of this assumption to the case of a hovering rotor is, of course, equivalent to describing
the flow at any blade station as two-dimensional at all azimuth locations.
The above-mentioned report considers, in particular, two cases. In the first
case, the response of the first two natural modes, rigid flapping and first
bending, of a fuUy-articulated, two-bladed rotor to a sinusoidal variation in
collective pitch was investigated. Equations of motion were derived by an
energy approach and solved for a range of frequency ratios ~o0/~Q from 0 to 4,
60
ZAMP
and for a rotor corresponding to that used in the experimental phase. In defining the natural modes, the rigid flapping mode shape was, of course, known
and the firstbending mode was described by the common approximation
y(~) _~ 4 ~
3 7,
where ~ is the station radius measured from the hub, y(~) is the displacement
from its equilibrium position of the blade section located by ~/, and R is the
radius of the rotor.
The second case considered was the response of the first two modes to a
sinusoidal vertical displacement of the rotor hub. These equations were derived
by GALERKIN'S method, and the solution was obtained for the frequency
ratios c%/f2 from 0 to 4, and for the same rotor as in the first case.
The primary purpose of the investigation was to measure the effects of the
unsteady aerodynamic forces on the rotor. Accordingly, the rotor response to
each type of forcing was computed by each of three existing unsteady aerodynamic theories, and the predicted response corresponding to each theory
was compared with the measured response obtained in the experimental
program.
The first unsteady aerodynamic theory used was the so-called' quasi-static'
theory in which the effect of the wake upon the aerodynamic forces acting on
the airfoil is neglected entirely. The second theory consisted of assuming that
the shed vortices arising from the varying circulation about the airfoil trail off
along the chord-line of the airfoil to infinity. This assumption gives rise to the
'lift-deficiency function' C(k) described by THEODORSEN [2].
The third theory considered, one applicable to helicopter rotors in particular, consists of assuming, and accounting for, the presence of not only the
shed vortices trailing off behind the airfoil, but also those lying in planes
(approximately) in or beneath the plane of rotation due to preceding blades
and/or revolutions. This is the previously mentioned method of LOEWY [3],
which was first verified experimentally by DAUGHDAY,DUWALT,and GATES[4].
A similar theoretical model was used by TIMMAN and VAN DE VOOREN [5],
but these authors considered only the particular case of the vortex pattern in
the plane of rotation (corresponding to no inflow through the rotor). Applying
this theory in the expressions for lift in the equations of motion consists of
simply replacing C(k) by a 'modified lift-deficiency' function C'(k, m, h')
which depends not only on the reduced frequency k, but also on the inflow
and number of blades.
To provide background for the developments that follow, some results of
the above work are reproduced here in Figures 1, 2, and 3. Figures 1 and 2
present the magnitude and phase, respectively, of the flapping response to
sinusoidal variation in collective pitch; Figure 3 shows the magnitude of the
Vol. I X b , 1958
61
1"2
1'0
0'8
o
0"6
0"~.
0"2
i
0:5
1.0
1"5 to o
2"0
2"5
3"0
3.5
T
Figure 1
F l a p p i n g response to p i t c h i n p u t - a m p l i t u d e .
T h e o r e t i c a l curves h = 0 ' 2 5 ; e x p e r i m e n t a l points h = 0.
quasi-static;
-C(k) = F + i G;
- - - C'(k, h, m) =: F" + i G'.
220 ~
200 ~
oK
180 ~
120 ~
-q~13
80 ~
40 ~
j~
0.,5
1.0
1.5
2.0 to 0 2.5
3.0
3.5
4,0
/z.5
Figure 2
F l a p p i n g response to p i t c h i n p u t - p h a s G
T h e o r e t i c a l c u r v e s h = 0"25; e x p e r i m e n t a l curves h = 0.
------quasi-static;
C(k) = F + i G ;
- C'(k, h, m) = F ' + i G .
62
1"8
"]'6
1-t~
ZAMP
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
12
1'0
I
l
l
l
\
\
0-6,
/
04
l.O
2'0
//
3 0 coz ~..0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2
Figure 3
Flapping response to displacement input at hub-amplitude.
Theoretical curves h = 0-25; experimental points h = 0.
C(k) = F + iG; - quasi-static;
c'(k, h, m) = F" + i 6";
o experimental points.
63
64
ZAMP
(2) a more accurate interpretation of rotary wing test data taken on a test
pylon in the proximity of a ground plane, and (3) a rough approximation to
the aerodynamic pulse loading experienced by a rotor as it passes over a
fuselage.
The basic aerodynamic model postulated in E3] is retained, hence no attempt is made in this paper to reiterate that complete development. Furthermore, since the main consideration is a study of the ground plane effects, a
single-bladed rotor has been considered, so as to separate clearly the ground
effects from multi-blade considerations. This step promotes the interests of
clarity and simplicity, the extension to a multi-bladed rotor being straightforward.
When the basic aerodynamic model postulated by LOEWY E3] is placed in
the proximity of a ground plane, additional conditions must be fulfilled. One
obvious condition is that the velocity component normal to the ground plane
is zero along the ground plane. Also it is assumed that the shed wake does not
rebound from the ground plane. The wake is collected, held captive at the
ground level and quickly dissipated by vortex-ground plane interaction
(Figure 4). This behavior is observed, for example, when a smoke ring is
blown against a flat surface.
CO
-CO.
Cu
Shed vopticity
coptupedend
annihiI~ted by
vortex - g round
inteructton
Ground plane
Figure 4
Schematic of vortex cancellation.
65
Vol. I X b , 1958
"
n= 1
- _
n:2
/,e
n*=p ~
"7
n;2
....
n'l
,,_
(~-
....
, 2~ru
....
''
~/
g2
- ~
Ho,
Ground plane
Image vortex
"
wake system
Figure 5
P i c t u r e of theoretical model with g r o u n d plane.
t) d.~' ~ra(~',
,
-~'-
2 .-,
~o(x', t)
--b'
--b
oo
oo
+ i ~,o!?'~-!.,
~, d ~ ' - / rA,,t)(~ - r 1 6 2
J
,~ - ~
b'
b"
(1)
oo
/q
0,3
L (.;'=
(.,.'-
h':ll'
(2)
n*--2p+e-n=/-n,
/= 2p+
e.
(3)
L e t t i n g y w = -7w e'~*, and since y~o~ is the vorticity shed at some earlier time,
Now using the b o u n d a r y condition of zero pressure difference across the wake
pattern, defining a circulation function
b'
b'
/'~a d~'
Zb
ZAMP IXb/5
66
ZAMP
~o(~) =
" e
CO
d~ + ik_~
J(x-~)~+(/h)
1
P
-ik?' ZI
;~e--i2nmn--ik.~
(5)
I;
Ia
L. = i ~ e -kq'- e - i ( k x + 2 . . . . ),
(6)
(7)
where
q.,.= n h ,
Now letting
q3= n* h.
(~ - x) = 2, a l s o n o t i n g t h a t 9
"'~,~ e-
11 ~ - e - ' k ~ j - ~ , .
(8)
d;t.
(9)
i2-e--k2],
where
1
(10)
exponential integrals,
kl
Z=/h.
Collecting results, the upwash equation may be rewritten as
--
oo
~ ( x ) - 2-~-jy2_-~-d~+ ~/~
1
2~ j x - ~
--1
(11)
67
where
(12)
n=l
Applying S6HNGEN'S [61 inversion relation to equation (11) and following the
classical work of SCHWARTZ[15], the pressure distribution is expressible as
1
-AFa(*' -- 2 [ 1 - C ' ] i V
1
V 1 + ~ 77a(~)d~
~ - x
-1
2 i(V ~
+ W
(13)
1-~
.-~
--1
where
Al(x,~)=
fin
(14)
and
c' =
(15)
The above pressure distribution equation, has the same form as that for a
corresponding two-dimensional fixed wing, oscillating in incompressible flow.
Therefore, as noted in [31, the usual fixed-wing expressions for lift and moment
may be used when describing the simple harmonic unsteady aerodynamics of
a rotating blade section in the presence of a ground plane, provided that the
above definition of C' is substituted for the fixed-wing Theodorsen function
C(k). Additionally, the flap-damping coefficient is given by CU.D. = 2 ~ F',
and the pitch-damping coefficient E7] is given by
a~ 2 G'
where C' = F ' + i G' (a pitch axis location measured aft of the midchord in
semichords).
Therefore, by calculating IY, and hence C', all the necessary aerodynamic
information is then available to perform the standard dynamic stress analysis
routines, the 'typical section' flutter analyses and the approximate threedimensional (strip theory) flutter analyses.
Of most immediate interest, however, is an assessment of the ground-plane
effects on the rotary wing. This assessment can be made by observing the functional dependence of C', Cy.D. and Cp.D., on frequency ratio, with the wakespacing and the total rotor-ground spacing as parameters. Furthermore, since
the dependence of C', Cr.D. and Cp.D. on h' is qualitatively the same as
exhibited in [3}, only H o will be considered as a new parameter. These functional dependences are shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8. As to be expected, when
68
r =16
1'0
ZA.MP
h'l"O0
0'8
0.8
F'
0.4
0'2
0
0
0-5
10
1.5
2-0
FPequency patio
25
3:0
3.~
4.0
m.co/f~
Figure 6
F l a p d a m p i n g coefficient.
500
~00
300
~00
I00
,~,
0~
10
,0
25
3o
3~
,0
m
Figure 7
O--OHo=3.5556
P i t c h d a m p i n g c o e f f i c i e n t (a = 0).
; A--&
H o = 7.Illl;
....
Ho = ~
H o + oo, I~V uniformly approaches W, where W is the wake weighting function given in E3].
It can be concluded from the figures that the presence of the ground plane
provides additional positive aerodynamic damping to all blade modes of
69
Vol. I X b , 1958
80
60
20
Y
-~0
0"5
l'O
1.5
2"0
2'5
3.0
3.5
4,0
m
1;igure 8
P i t c h d a m p i n g coefficient (a = -- 1).
C P, D. vPI'S|lS II$.
4. T h r e e - D i m e n s i o n a l
U n s t e a d y F l o w Effects
70
ZAMP
Cla b
s~
4~9r
r-,l
RI
Here cl~, b', and s o denote the local lift-curve slope, blade semichord, and
incidence measured from zero-lift, all of which may be functions of r. ~Vhen
equation (16) is solved by well-known methods, it yields spanwise load distributions and rotor thrust coefficients which fall among the values estimated b y
more commonly used theoretical methods Eg]. (Certain other quantities such
71
as induced inflow velocity do not compare so favorably, but the emphasis here
is on airloads.)
The theory of the oscillating finite wing in incompressible flow which is a
direct extension of lifting-line theory, and which reduces thereto when the frequency approaches zero, is REISSNER'S E12]. The authors have, in effect,
modified REISSNER'S physical approximations and mathematical derivation to
include the effect of a space-variable main stream V(r). It is impossible to
present the detailed steps here. Only the general outline is given, but the
interested reader can find the full development in [13].
Figure 9
A rotor blade osciUating sinusoidally in a sheared flow, showing locatkms of coordinate systems.
Definitions:
1
r'
,'=,--Ro;
+7'
(z,~-)=
z; + z~
~=
~b--~o"
-~ [z; - zl]
Figure 9 illustrates the rotor blade in a sheared flow and defines the dimensional and dimensionless coordinates used in the development. The motion
of the blade is specified in terms of the normal velocity component of fluid
particles in contact with it (upwash)
va(x', r', t) = -~,~ (x', r') e i''t ,
(17)
which is assumed to be a known quantity. The flow over the blade and its wake
is approximated b y a vortex sheet in the (x' - r')-plane with circulation components (velocity discontinuities) 7 spanwise and ~ chordwise. The amplitude
of total circulation ['(r') bound to the blade is replaced by a modified circulation function/w, defined, following REISSXER [12!, as
]~(r') = r ( 7 ) e.,,~,v
b~
(18)
from the trailing edge and the requirement of zero pressure discontinuity
72
ZAMP
through the wake vortex sheet leads to the lifting-surface integral equation
(factor ei~ has been cancelled)
_ ,
vo (x, r') =
~
4~
sb~ x t _
~,~(~,,~)[x ~ r
(~- = ~U#
~ = 3~3 ~
-,/]
a~' d,/
--sb'. x t
b6
4~
--sb'. x t
~o(z,
y*)
....
c'~
L. d:~(r162
--1
dr
4 . y at/* k~
--s
+ i ~-' t~~
"+ 4~'z
('rl*) ~
t V(t/*)]
+/:zit'(,*)/v(,~*)
--$
V(r*)
- ~*~)~/ dr*.
(2o)
Vol. IXb,
Unsteady
1958
73
o~ v ( ~ * )
v(~*)
'
ko(r,)_ v(~*)
oJ b6 '
o~ b'(n*)
o~bd
k(,~*) k0(~*) -
y (n*) '
..
~q
/" Ze-"d3.
[ql [1 - - i q K 0 ([q])] + -2- [L~
NA (q) = q J [fi-+ }~i5~-~ -- q
--
I~
(22)
2v)~(q) = q j
]"
e - z ) " d).
1
-j~-~]_~-~
. . . . q- + AN~(q)
(23)
= 1 _ i [q/ + ~
[/l(q) - Ll(q)] +
q
q
-
I ] Kl(!q] ) _
q '
oo
Nc(q) =
-)3." q;
o
q I-D-- d2
l~p
= l qL In 1 2 q ] +
q
[L0(x ) - I o ( x ) ] d x - i
(24)
!q:
Ko(X)dx
Here I~ and Kn are modified Bessel functions, while L~ is the modified Struve
function [14] of the first kind and order n. The pole singularity of N8 at q = 0,
which is just the steady-state singularity of lifting-line theory, has been separated for c o m p u t a t i o n a l convenience, leaving a remainder ANB which is everywhere finite. Na and Nc have no singularities for real, finite arguments excepting an integrable, logarithmic singularity of Nc at the origin. No particular difficulty was encountered when constructing tables of these functions
over the ranges needed, one convenience being t h a t they are all odd.
The integral equation (20) is readily solved for ~ b y well-known methods
of thin airfoil theory (cf. SCH~NARZ [153). The result can be cast as the s u m of
two-dimensional theory plus a three-dimensional correction c o n t a i n i n g / " and
the N-functions, In view of the relation
xt
xz
--
"'
'
--I
--
b'o e - i [ k + k ~
?'(r*)
(25)
74
ZAMP
the expression for Ya can be integrated chordwise to produce an integrodifferential equation for _~', which is the principal unknown
F '(~)= F ' + ;r i [Ht~(k) + i H~J(k)]
x NB (ko(,*) ~r* -
7*]) +
e-ik~
if'(~*)~,
V(~*) : -- i f :
~V~-*y! Na
V01*)
@*
s
- r ~(k)-;I.(k)l,-'~
-- d~l*
....
--S
+ i ko
v(.*), d.,.
d iv(.*)]
/~(~*) -P(~-~y
t v(,:)j N. (ko(~*) [,* - 7*]) ' - " : " 7(7*)
v(,*)
--8
_V(r*) ~
(.o[fo(,,
V(r*) ,1
J,
[:o
b'
~'(~) = 4 ....
b6 eik~
~/-i--~-o(r162
(27)
~V- ......
(z, r*) + i k / ~
~a
(28)
(~, r*) d ;
a
-1
,fo(....)
. I:
r( )l f
;.l:. ,.)
--1
+Wf[~ZVI-r
(z-r
z'~-~lT~'#T-fi/j (29,
--I
75
Here the first two lines are the strip-theory result, and Fo, F~, F~ represent
rather elaborate integrals across the rotor span, containing ~ ' and the N-functions but independent of the chordwise coordinate. Suitable chordwise integrations of Ap-~ give the complex amplitudes of lift force (positive upward)
per unit span and pitching moment (positive nose-up about a midchord axis)
per unit span'
E
~"
[ Fo(r*) + 1
Fl(r* )
1
F2(r*)]
q V~b' -- qv"-b' + ~ -- - - V - -2- " - - ( 1 - - -- ~ "
V .'
(30)
-FI
~ l '2'
~ [ Fo(r* )
Fl(r* )
3
F2(r*) ]
e V2 b'2 -- e V2 b'2 + - 2 - -- ~
+
V
---4- "
V ]"
(31)
The practical application of the foregoing theory is carried out in two steps.
First, the circulation integral equation is solved by introducing the angle
variables
r* = s cos(F, ~* = s cos 0,
(32)
approximating the circulation function by the Fourier series
I?'(r *) ~= ~
(33)
K~ si)~n_ ~
R*/s + cos ~
R,* + r*
=
-R~;-+ ~*
R*/~ +
(34)
Co~0
as factors in their integrands. Although the first examples were laborious, the formulation is now systematized and well adapted to high-speed digital computation.
To obtain some idea of the importance of three-dimensional effects on
vibrating rotors, the theory has been used to compute the loads due to pitching
and flapping of a constant-chord blade with aspect ratio 8. The frequency is
given by r
= 1. (Since the relative wind is everywhere proportional to rotor
speed s it is unnecessary to specify a reference value of reduced frequency k ;
all dimensionless quantities are fixed by c~/Y2LFive spanwise stations were
chosen, spaced equally in the variable 9.) Figure 10 plots, vs. radial distance,
76
2~~
'
~,/
TnPee-Oimensionat
phase
/ 2 o
Two-rtimensionnt
am0tituoe
- --7"
..,~3
/
~
ZAMP
"x,
0.2
0-t
/...~--._Tm'ee-tlimenslonall
~
160
12" ~,
8" ==
phase
"1
0"6
0"8
1-04 ~
It2
Figure l0
Dimensionless a m p l i t u d e and phase angle of lift due to pitching oscillation, a b o u t the q u a r t e r - c h o r d
axis for a c o n s t a n t - c h o r d r o t o r with R 1 = 8 in., Ro = 40 in., 2 b = 5 in. Circular f r e q u e n c y ~o = .O.
the dimensionless amplitude and phase angle of lift per unit span due to nose-up
pitching oscillation
c~ = ~ e i~,t
(35)
about an axis along the quarter-chord line. Dimensions of the blade planform
are listed in the caption. ~pr~ is the phase angle b y which the force leads the
angular displacement; on a quasi-steady basis it would equal zero. The curves
marked ' two-dimensional' represent the unsteady strip theory of THEODORSEa"
[2], which is discussed in previous sections. Other airloads due to pitching and
flapping show the same general behavior as Figure 10, for the particular rotor
and value of o)/.(2 chosen here.
It can be concluded that in this example the phase shift produced b y threedimensionality of the flow is small enough to be negligible when one is analyzing forced motion. The reduction of amplitude is more significant, particularly
in the tip region. The total lift drops roughly 2 5 0 , while the moment about the
flapping hinge of the blade is reduced by well over 30%. Further remarks on
the imphcations of this calculation are made in the next section.
The three-dimensional theory can be modified in an approximate way to
account either for the returning shed vortices in the helical wake during vertical flight, or for the small fluctuations of relative wind due to forward flight
at low tip-speed ratios. It is unlikely that both of these effects would have to
be introduced simultaneously.
77
Without going into detail, the shed-vortex modification is made on a twodimensional basis b y analogy with LOEWY'S work [31. The two-dimensional
circulation function of equations (27) and (26) must be replaced by (midchord
sweep zm is set equal to zero here for simplicity)
1
2 Jfl/
V 1 - ~ ~(~' r*) d~
Ft(2) =
--1
j%
} .
~ i k t 2 [ni2}(k) + i H~-~(k)]+ [ y # ) + iYo(k)] W
(36)
(37)
Some care must be observed when handling terms containing the combined
factors e i~'t and e i ' , t , but for a particular motion like flapping or pitching,
the principal changes come in the function F'(") and the two-dimensional parts
of the loading expressions. It is important to realize that GREENBER~'S theory
contains the implicit restriction that a / k , is small compared with unity, where
k, = co, b ' / V o. This may limit its applicability to typical rotor problems rather
severely.
No numerical examples involving forward speed or shed vortices have been
worked out as yet. From the general formulation, however, there is good
reason to believe that three-dimensional loadings incorporating the latter will
exhibit the same drops in magnitude and losses of aerodynamic damping near
integral values of m that were discovered in LOEWY'S original investigation.
5. C o n c l u s i o n s
78
ZAMZ'
must be accounted for, with particular reference to the shed vortices in the
helical wake. If this is not done, potentially dangerous resonances near frequency ratios which are integral multiples of the number of blades wilt be overlooked. It can be inferred that aeroelastic stability is subject to the same influences, and that rotor flutter speeds much lower than those computed without regard for the returning wake may occur whenever the flutter frequency is
close to any critical multiple of Q.
In the presence of the ground, the dangers of resonant vibration and flutter
are reduced, since the ground plane provides additional aerodynamic damping
for all modes of blade motion. Single-degree-of-freedom flutter can still occur
in an unfavorable combination of circumstances. When the rotor plane is more
than two diameters above the surface, ground effects become negligible.
For values of the reduced oscillation frequency typical of helicopter practice, the three-dimensionality of the flow does not cause significant changes in
the phase angle between a given motion and the airloads produced thereby.
There will be a large amplitude reduction, however, especially near the rotor
tip. This suggests, incidentally, that finite-span effects can perhaps be estimated on a steady-state basis. It cannot be concluded that forced vibratory
responses calculated by strip theory will always be larger than those actually
encountered, because three-dimensional effects reduce both the forcing functions and the aerodynamic 'springs' and 'dampers' opposing them. Since
these reductions are not the same for all terms in the equations of motion,
further study is needed to discover the conditions under which strip-theory
predictions are unacceptable. Three-dimensional flow is likely to be more
significant for flutter analyses, since flutter occurs at a stability boundary,
whose location may be sensitive to small changes in the aerodynamic properties
of the system.
Tile present investigation concentrates on the case of vertical flight. It is
possible, however, to adjust both conventional strip theory and the threedimensional approach of section 4 to account for forward motion at small tipspeed ratios. This can be done along the lines proposed by GREENBERG [t6].
Since the most severe forced vibrations are often encountered on helicopters
in this transitional range, further study of the problem is very desirable.
REFERENCES
Eli j. ZVARA, N. D. HA.~I und H. H. MOSER, E[[ects of Unsteady Aerodynamics on
Helicopter Rotors, Part I, to be issued as a "W.A.D.C. Technical Report (1958).
~2] T. THEOOORSEN,General Theory o/Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism
o/Flutter, Report 496, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (1935).
[3] R. G. LoEwY, A Two-Dimensional Approximation to the Unsteady Aerodynamics o/Rotary Wings, Report 75, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory (1955).
79
g(x) = ~
yd ~/(~)
dk
80
ZAMP