Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sponsored by the American Welding Society and the Welding Research Council
("Rul
BY D. J. WIDGERY
Introduction
The important influence which weld
deoxidation practice can have on the
toughness of the deposit has long
been recognized, but only in recent
years have attempts been made to
quantify the v a r i o u s m e c h a n i s m s
through which this influence is exerted (Refs. 1-4). A recent program at
the Welding Institute set out to investigate how deoxidation practice affected inclusion contents and microstructure and thus how resistance to
fracture in the ductile and brittle
modes was controlled. The results of
this investigation are reported here.
Some oxidation almost invariably
accompanies the welding of steel. In
the slag shielded processes, the activity of oxygen in the slag is not negligible and perfect shielding from atmospheric oxidation difficult to achieve.
The G M A W process generally relies
on the use of a mildly oxidizing gas to
allow some oxidation of the workpiece and stabilize the arc. Since oxidation cannot be avoided, deoxidation procedures must be devised to
minimize its adverse effects on the integrity and performance of the weld
and the optimization of these procedures was the object of this program.
The solid wire COz (GMAW) process
was chosen for this because it permits a moderate degree of oxidation,
is readily mechanized and is u n c o m plicated by the presence of a flux.
Further incentives to the use of this
process were its increasing c o m m e r cial acceptance and the fact that
many reactions in the weld pool are
c o m m o n to welds made with basic
manual metal-arc electrodes or with
(D
[ C ] . + [0]
Fe
(2)
Fe
which gives rise to porosity if its equilibrium pressure p c o exceeds 1 a t m o sphere. To prevent this, it is necessary to limit the product [C] [O] in the
mass action equation
= constant.
(3)
[C] . [O]
In practice, except in welding pure
iron, the carbon content of the pool
will always be such that the oxygen
activity must be reduced by adding
metallic deoxidants if porous welds
are to be avoided (Ref. 5).
If the first aim of deoxidation is to
prevent porosity, the second is to
minimize the amount of oxygen remaining in the deposit after solidification. Since there is little evidence
to contradict Sims' assertion (Ref. 6)
that "for all practical purposes, the
solubility of oxygen [in solid steel] is
so low that it may be neglected," this
objective may be restated as the minimization of the amount of oxide inclusions in the weld.
In steelmaking practice, control of
inclusion contents is generally achiev-
57-s
0.04
0.13
0.055
0.055
0.075
0.011
0.009
0.012
0.017
0.012
0.008
0.004
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.25
0.44
0.40
0.19
0.14
0.20
0.12
0.10
0.15
0.12
0.012
0.010
0.012
0.009
0.010
0.006
0.003
0.004
0.017
0.018
0.43
1.05
0.43
0.43
1.11
0.09
0.08
0.23
0.09
0.23
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.21
0.08
0.008
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.018
0.015
0.023
0.020
0.021
0.98
1.98
1.62
2.27
0.63
1.07
0.45
0.91
0.78
0.74
0.24
0.20
0.08
0.14
0.15
0.19
0.14
0.15
0.13
0.14
0.008
0.008
0.010
0.008
0.011
0.017
0.022
0.020
0.018
0.016
1.42
1.47
1.46
1.51
1.41
1.38
1.51
<0.01
0.76
0.79
0.78
0.70
0.14
0.17
0.32
0.01
0.15
0.16
0.14
0.16
0.14
0.13
0.24
0.01
0.010
0.007
0.010
0013
0.007
0.011
0.014
0.015
0.018
0.013
0.011
0.018
Mn
Si
Ti
A
B
C
D
E
0.05
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.09
1.14
1.11
1.63
2.15
1.10
0.51
0.92
0.50
1.05
1.40
0.19
0.22
0.36
0.14
0.46
F
G
H
J1
J2
0.07
0.11
0.11
0.08
0.08
1.42
1.10
1.53
1.51
1.42
0.51
0.46
0.90
0.78
0.77
K
L
M
N
0
0.08
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.08
1.95
0.98
1.01
1.02
1.92
P
Q
R
S
T
0.08
0.09
0.08
0.09
0.07
U
V
0.07
0.08
0.10
0.07
0.09
0.07
Al
Experimental Program
The work was planned to study the
effects of four deoxidants, Mn, Si, Ti
and Al. The program centered on the
measurement of fracture toughness,
for which theoretical and practical
considerations led to the adoption of
the crack o p e n i n g d i s p l a c e m e n t
(COD) test (Ref. 8). Welding procedures were designed to provide COD
testpieces with the notch in a single
weld run. To provide the link between the composition and mechanical properties of the deposit, quantitative measurements of the microstructure and inclusion contents were
undertaken. The experimental plan
was based on the use of multiple
regression analysis to interpret the
results.
Experimental Electrodes
X
Y
\ ^ \/-3mm
mol md.
Fig. 1 Preparation
of
experimental
welds: (a) plate grooved, (b) buttered and
regrooved,
(c) experimental
weld completed
1976
& =-
cr = ke
(5)
(4)
1 + a+z
Metallography
r(W-a)
where V g is the knife edge displacement, a the total crack depth, z the
knife edge thickness, W the specimen width and r the rotational factor,
taken here as 1/3 in accordance with
the British S t a n d a r d s Institution's
Draft for Development on COD testing
(Ref. 14).
Tensile Testing
V1
*p
&ep
3/ryn
X 3rmil\ S ^ r i y ! ,. 5mm.mot
md.orPmm
Spsf1
COD Testing
In addition to the practical advantage that the COD test gives in sampling well defined microstructural regions, its theoretical basis, which
allows it to be used for the prediction
of critical or allowable defect sizes in
real fabrications, has led to its increased use in specifications for critical applications such as offshore
structures. A third benefit in using the
test is that since it measures resistance only to fracture initiation and
not to propagation, which may involve different mechanisms, metallurgical interpretation of the results
tends to be simpler than when the
Charpy test is used.
In the present work, specimens
were produced as shown in Fig. 2 with
the notch parallel to the welding
direction. A slot produced with a 0.13
.i
JU
JM :
iv:v-'X;^,-:~^:---'#'"' "Jf:W^
IP
-
'
'
>
.4-//.^:
W E L D I N G R E S E A R C H S U P P L E M E N T ! 59-s
Carbon replica
expense of greater difficulty in achieving adequate reproducibility in quantitative work. For example, the former
approach might rely on light microscopy while the latter would use the
electron microscope. The decision
was made h e r e t o begin by using light
microscopy so that large numbers of
measurements could be made quickly and with minimal sampling errors.
The measurements were backed by
electron microscope studies on both
replicas and thin foils, but it was c o n cluded that quantitative data need not
be sought from these if it was possib l e to c o r r e l a t e t h e m e c h a n i c a l
p r o p e r t i e s of the w e l d s with the
results of light metallography, as was
f o u n d to be the case.
A Swift point counter* was used for
quantitative m i c r o s t r u c t u r a l m e a surements. This moves the specimen
under the microscope in a predetermined grid pattern, the investigator
identifying the structure and operating the appropriate counter at each
grid point. Transverse weld sections
were examined at a magnification of
x200 and 100 microstructural identifications were made at 0.05 m m
(0.002 in.) intervals along each of 10
lines, parallel to the plate surface and
0.2 mm (0.008 in.) apart, starting 1
m m (0.04 in.) below the plate surface.
Thus 1,000 counts were made in a 5
X 2 m m (0.2 X 0.08 in.) area in the
center of the weld, corresponding to
t h e n o t c h p o s i t i o n in t h e C O D
specimens.
T h e s y s t e m of c l a s s i f i c a t i o n
adopted is shown in Fig. 3, and represents an attempt to reconcile the requirements of easy recognition with
an accurate reflection of the transf o r m a t i o n process. To avoid the
semantic confusion apparent in the
literature on weld microstructures, the
products were initially identified only
by numbers: later, it was possible to
ascribe to them places in the overall
transformation scheme.
Inclusion Counting
Gloor et al showed in 1963 (Ref. 16)
that the majority of weld metal inclusions are too small, typically < 1 n m ,
"James Swift and Son Limited, Basingstoke, England.
60-s | M A R C H
1976
show-
to be resolved in the light microscope and most subsequent investigators have relied on transmission
or scanning electron m i c r o s c o p y
(TEM or SEM) for inclusion measurements. However, while either method
can provide a straightforward means
of measuring the size distribution of
inclusions on the surface of a fracture produced by microvoid coalescence, only indirect methods are
available to find the size and spatial
distribution of inclusions in the matrix.
These methods are based on two
models of specimen preparation, the
flat surface model and the deep etch
model.
In materials polished flat for o p tical metallography the area fraction
A A of any second phase on the surface may be equated to the volume
fraction V v of the phase in the matrix.
Against this ease of volume fraction
measurement must be set the need to
allow for sectioning effects in c o n verting the observed distribution of
inclusion section sizes to a volume
size distribution. Procedures for this,
based on a method proposed by
Scheil (Ref. 17), assume, reasonably
in the case of weld metals, that the inclusions are spherical. Although these
procedures are somewhat cumbersome and prone to cumulative errors,
a more important objection to the use
of the flat surface model is the difficulty of finding an imaging mechanism w h i c h the m o d e l accurately
represents. At first sight, it might
appear that the conditions of the
model would be fulfilled by the use of
polished specimens in the SEM and
trials were undertaken with this instrument.
As a "bench m a r k " weld, a manual
metal-arc deposit made with rutile
covered electrodes and containing
0.079% O (vacuum fusion determination) and 0.022% S was selected.
These figures could be converted to
an estimated inclusion volume fraction with reasonable confidence by
assuming that the deoxidation p r o d ucts were the same as those a n alyzed by Gloor et al (Ref. 16) and that
the sulfur was present as MnS. This
led to an estimated inclusion volume
fraction of 0.53% (Ref. 18). Since the
Al 2 0 3 and T i 0 2 contents of the inclusions were expected to be low, any
(1/xNs(x)
(6)
This is the basis of the analysis proposed by Ashby and Ebeling (Ref. 21)
and adopted in recent work at the
Welding Institute (Refs. 3, 22). The
use of an electropolishing technique
found to give an acceptably flat surface, together with shadowed replicas to show nonextracted inclusions,
allows v o l u m e f r a c t i o n m e a s u r e ments to be made without recourse to
the d o u b l e r e p l i c a t e c h n i q u e rep o r t e d elsewhere (Ref. 23). The
method readily yields all the important parameters describing the size
and spatial distributions of the particles using only simple computations, and the calculated inclusion
volume fractions are in acceptable
agreement with those estimated from
the weld chemistry. Although the
method used by Gloor et al (Ref. 16)
also produced credible results, this
was of much greater analytical c o m plexity, being based on a combination of the deep etch and flat surface
models.
COD Tests
Vv
>/6)2"x2Ns(x)5x
(7)
E x p e r i m e n t a l Results
Thirty-one welds were made and
their chemical analyses are given in
Table 2. Sulfur and phosphorus c o n tents were less than 0.02% in all the
welds made with experimental electrodes. Carbon contents averaged
0.09% and showed a very low degree
of correlation with the levels of metallic deoxidants, though in the single
case of weld V a low carbon content of
0.03% was associated with a low total
deoxidant content: this weld was too
porous to be tensile tested or COD
tested.
Table 2 Chemical Analysis (wt %) of Weld Deposits Made with Experimental and Two
Commercial Electrodes
Mn
Weld
Ti
Al
-.(a)
(b)
A
B
C
D
E
0.10
0.11
0.11
0.09
0.10
0.77
1.33
1.10
1.56
0.82
0.27
0.54
0.26
0.58
0.61
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.04
0.12
0.008
0.013
0.013
0.018
0.025
0.017
0.017
0.012
0.013
0.014
0.018
0.018
0.012
0.015
0.012
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.011
0.007
0.055
0.055
0.048
0.055
0.047
F
G
H
J1
J2
0.08
0.09
0.11
0.09
0.07
0.96
0.74
1.11
1.13
1.05
0.23
0.28
0.49
0.60
0.57
0.06
0.10
0.11
0.07
0.05
0.046
0.023
0.024
0.06
0.04
0.013
0.011
0.013
0.010
0.012
0.013
0.014
0.010
0.016
0.016
0.012
0.009
0.008
0.004
0.012
0.067
0.058
0.057
0.060
0.056
0.088
J1R
J2R
J2RR
K
L
0.08
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.05
1.10
1.06
1.00
1.13
0.72
0.50
0.48
0.53
0.17
0.86
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.007
0.011
0.013
0.008
0.007
0.018
0.015
0.017
0.012
0.007
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.010
0.003
0.054
0.063
0.063
0.064
0.063
M
N
O
P
Q
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.53
0.73
1.43
0.77
1.46
0.16
0.26
0.92
0.92
0.31
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.09
0.08
0.014
0.06
0.03
0.065
0.07
0.009
0.007
0.009
0.011
0.008
0.015
0.011
0.013
0.014
0.013
0.004
0.006
0.010
0.008
0.006
0.048
0.053
0.045
0.048
0.042
R
S
T
U
V
0.08
0.09
0.07
0.08
0.03
1.27
1.60
0.45
1.06
0.68
0.76
0.57
0.52
1.20
<0.01
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.05
<0.01
0.055
0.045
0.045
0.045
<0.005
0.008
0.008
0.011
0.012
0.008
0.013
0.017
0.014
0.013
0.014
0.005
0.014
0.009
0.009
0.004
0.047
0.040
0.052
0.043
0.080
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.10
1.06
1.12
1.15
0.93
1.09
0.84
0.58
0.58
0.66
0.45
0.58
0.28
0.11
<0.01
0.06
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
0.05
0.04
0.12
<0.005
<0.005
0.19
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.011
0.013
0.014
0.020
0.015
0.014
0.021
0.015
0.007
0.009
0.005
0.016
0.006
0.011
0.049
0.041
0.046
0.029
0.034
0.036
X
Y
Com. 1
Com. 2
0.094
0.097
0.12
0.10
0.095
0.10
0.10
0.12
0.10
WELDING
RESEARCH SUPPLEMENT!
61-S
)
I
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
J1
J2
&
-^-
COO a fracture
o COO at maximum toad
f*
0-6
05
03
0-2
,.^
or
I
A
-100
-SO
-60
-AO
remperattire.
-20
.1
'C
weld metals generally means that interest is concentrated at the lower end
of the transition range. To compare
this aspect of the behavior of the experimental welds, a transition temperature Tc corresponding to 5c = 0.1
mm (0.004 in.) is tabulated for all the
welds in Table 3. This may be regarded as a measure of their cleavage resistance.
The results of a regression analysis of Tc on weld composition are
shown in Table 4. These results may
be presented graphically by omitting
each term successively f r o m the
regression equation and using the decompleted equation to predict T c . The
error in prediction, ATC, is then related to the level of the variable
omitted. Thus Fig. 7 effectively shows
the variation in Tc with Mn content,
other elements being corrected to a
constant level.
An unsatisfactory feature of Fig. 7 is
the presence of a single point, indicating the greatest overestimate of T c ,
but which by appearing at the low Mn
end of the scale seems to reverse the
general trend to lower transition temperatures with increasing Mn. This
62-s | M A R C H
J1R
J2R
J2RR
K
L
Wl
N
0
P
Q
63
47
46
94
30
-141
67
75
25
54
R
S
T
U
W
X
Y
Z
Com. 1
Com. 2
88
-113
11
31
18
79
90
77
65
55
0-7
-39
-51
-28
-94
- 1
-38
+ 16
-19
-76
-49
1976
level unless results for the c o m m e r cial electrodes were included. Average RA values varied between 50 and
70%: individual results below 50%
were always associated with a small
pore. Tensile ductility was not d i rectly correlated with composition in
any simple way.
Microstructure
Table 7 gives the results of classifying the weld microstructures according to the simple scheme of Fig.
3. Thin foil and replicas studied in the
TEM and thermal analysis of the
welds as they cooled allowed the
structures seen to be rationalized as
follows.
In low dilution situations, mild steel
weld metals solidify as columnar 5
ferrite grains and austenite nucleates
at the boundaries of these as they
cool. If an austenite nucleus grows
into only one of the adjacent 5 ferrite
grains, the f> boundary will be preserved as an austenite boundary: if
the nucleus grows both ways, the
boundary will disappear. In fact, the
position of the original ferrite b o u n daries can often be revealed by solute
sensitive etches such as brominemethanol and this enables the relationship between the 5 ferrite and
austenite structures to be inferred,
since the austenite boundaries subsequently act as nucleation sites for
pro-eutectoid ferrite. In the present
work the austenite boundaries were
found to be largely independent of the
solidification boundaries, although
the structure remained columnar.
Structure I in the classification
scheme was pro-eutectoid ferrite,
which in addition to forming thin veins
at the austenite boundaries was also
seen as polygonal grains within the
columnar structure in weld metals of
low hardenability. Structure II, mainly
Widmanstatten ferrite side plates,
often grew continuously from the
massive grain boundary ferrite with
no intermediate sub-boundaries. Any
upper bainite which formed would
have been included as structure II on
the basis of its appearance in the light
microscope, but there was no evidence on replicas or thin foils e x a m ined in the TEM of the sheaf structure
of independently nucleated sub-units
which has been cited as a distinguishing feature of upper bainite.
Structure III may be described as
acicular ferrite and was the only one
of the four whose incidence in the experimental welds was negatively correlated with transformation temperature. Weld S, containing 8 8 % of acicular ferrite, transformed over the approximate range 630-450 C (1170840 F), while at the other extreme of
hardenability weld V yielded only 8%
of acicular ferrite after transforming in
the range 710-545 C (1310-1010 F).
The grain size of the acicular ferrite
was represented by a mean linear intercept in the range 1-2 (tm, the finer
structures corresponding to the lower
transformation temperatures.
The fourth key on the point c o u n ter was reserved for all structures
which could not readily be assigned to
the other three classes, but only one
type of structure made an important
contribution to this g r o u p in quantitative terms. This was a sub-pearlitic
aggregate of ferrite and carbides, recognizable but not usually resolved in
the light microscope. Electron microscopy showed the carbides to be
aligned in rows, w h i c h often a p peared parallel to a y-t-ct transformation boundary, suggesting an interphase precipitation mechanism. The
structure was found in welds of low
hardenability and strength but no a d v e r s e e f f e c t s on t o u g h n e s s w a s
detected.
Other microstructural constituents,
pearlite, retained austenite and martensite, were also observed, though
as these were not only low in total
quantity, but also so finely dispersed
that they were difficult to resolve and
identify in the light microscope, they
did not significantly influence the
overall microstructural assessment.
X-ray diffraction measurements of the
retained austenite are included in
Table 7. Since these were independent of the metallographic measurements the figures are not included in
Constant
Data set
A - U , W-Z
(V too porous)
A-Z, excluding M , V
A-Z, excluding M,V
-51
-
Mn
Si
Ti
Al
-45*
(-0.446)
-69***
(-0.786)
-68***
(-0.781)
28
(0.253)
10
(0.149)
not
included
703***
(0.632)
627***
(0.784)
630***
(0.782)
-301
(-0.270)
-390**
(-0.535)
-370**
(-0.520)
Multiple
correlation
coefficient
0.72
0.89
0.89
Table 5
Yield or 0.2%
proof stress,
N/mm2
Tensile
str,
N/mm2
Elongation,
RA,
A
B
C
D
E
479
470
537
563
547
608
586
648
696
693
26
24
24
28
23
60
60
64
56
50
0.16
0.15
0.12
0.14
0.12
F
G
H
J1
J2
514
520
532
536
539
611
633
711
661
630
22
20
24
27
28
58
60
57
57
58
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.11
0.13
J1R
J2R
J2RR
K
L
537
503
504
453
453
660
604
608
565
559
24
27
28
26
34
60
60
60
55
69
0.13
0.16
0.15
0.13
0.16
M
N
O
P
Q
388
451
569
538
582
486
555
689
674
710
34
32
30
28
24
59
63
61
60
58
0.17
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.09
R
S
T
U
W
547
569
465
573
578
650
734
557
714
708
30
26
29
27
24
57
52
65
54
59
0.13
0.13
0.14
0.14
0.10
X
Y
Z
Com 1
Com 2
535
560
533
477
468
630
692
623
618
601
30
26
31
28
27
59
56
66
55
58
0.15
0.12
0.14
0.13
0.13
Weld
Table 6 Results of Regression Analysis of Weld Metal Yield and Tensile Strengths on
Electrode and Weld Composition, for Strengths in N/mm2 and Composition in Wt. %<a)
Regression coefficient (partial correlation coefficient)
Dependent
variable
Source
of analysis
Const.
Electrode
347
<7V
Weld
331
UTS
Electrode
400
UTS
Weld
358
<*Y
Mn
Si
Ti
Al
not
included
192
(0.07)
not
included
725
(0.26)
66***
(0.69)
93***
(0.66)
88***
(0.74)
111***
(0.71)
45*
(0.43)
56*
(0.44)
62**
(0.50)
78**
(0.55)
127"
(0.49)
601**
(0.48)
215***
(0.64)
865***
(0.60)
181
(0.34)
305
(0.27)
221
(0.36)
333
(0.28)
Multi
correl.
coeff.
0.77
0.85
0.88
0.90
W E L D I N G R E S E A R C H S U P P L E M E N T ! 63-
II
Lamellar
components
III
Acicular
ferrite
IV
Other
structures
Retained
austenite
A
B
C
D
E
37.2
26.5
21.4
16.7
27.3
10.1
2.8
1.9
0.5
5.5
41.3
64.6
65.1
78.7
49.9
11.4
6.1
11.6
4.1
17.3
F
G
H
J1
J2
26.3
36.4
23.7
22.4
24.2
3.6
6.3
5.5
5.1
1.5
55.6
20.2
57.8
58.7
67.3
14.5
37.1
13.0
13.8
7.0
J1R
J2R
J2RR
K
L
21.7
29.1
24.3
18.9
59.4
1.8
4.1
1.8
20.3
2.6
67.0
62.0
72.6
16.4
32.3
9.5
4.8
1.3
44.4
5.7
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.0
1.0
M
N
O
P
Q
45.5
25.2
15.7
28.9
2.1
11.3
13.5
2.0
11.3
2.2
10.2
22.4
78.0
30.4
92.7
33.0
38.9
4.3
29.4
3.0
n.d.
1.0
3.3
3.3
1.8
R
S
T
U
V
20.8
8.9
41.6
28.5
29.6
3.7
1.6
10.0
1.3
8.3
71.5
87.6
36.8
67.6
5.7
4.0
1.9
11.6
2.6
56.4
2.8
4.8
1.0
3.7
n.d.
10.4
23.2
11.9
24.0
21.4
27.2
3.7
0.8
0.2
4.1
23.3
21.2
63.7
74.3
82.9
65.6
13.9
6.8
22.0
1.7
5.0
6.3
41.4
44.8
1.7
1.8
1.4
2.2
2.6
1.9
Weld
X
Y
Z
Com 1
Com 2
n.d.: not detected
64-s I M A R C H
1976
4
Mn/Si. wire
Fig. 8 Variation of inclusion volume fraction, Vy, in the deposit with Mn/Si ratio
of the wire
Geometric
mean
inclusion
diam, nm
Avg. vol.
nearest
neighbour
spacing,
A3, jim
No. of
inclusions
per mm 3 ,
N U X10 8
A
B
C
D
E
0.49
0.61
0.32
0.55
0.75
0.055
0.06
0.03
0.06
0.07
1.36
0.96
0.54
0.98
1.74
0.27
0.33
0.36
0.30
0.26
1.1
1.2
1.5
1.2
1.0
F
G
H
J1
K
0.43
0.41
0.50
0.41
0.51
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.45
0.52
1.03
0.29
0.65
0.41
0.35
0.28
0.50
0.42
1.6
1.5
1.2
1.8
1.4
L
N
S
T
U
Y
0.69
0.48
0.65
0.69
0.63
0.57
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.50
0.36
0.64
0.45
0.40
0.40
0.49
0.49
0.44
0.46
0.50
0.47
1.5
1.7
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.6
Weld
Est. std.
error in
vol. f r a c ,
meters of mercury. However, pressures much greater than this are required to sustain bubbles of the size
of weld metal inclusions: 1 atmosphere sustains a bubble of about 60
Mm (0.0024 in.) diam in molten steel
(Ref. 30). If the inclusions do not
coalesce into particles larger than
this, it seems possible that some may
not be reduced. Further investigations into the discrepancy between
different analytical methods are now
in progress, but in the meantime both
sets of oxygen figures have been
treated with caution.
It n e v e r t h e l e s s s e e m s c l e a r ,
whether we consider the chemical,
physical or metallographic estimates
of oxygen level, that this is independent, over a wide range, of the total
amount of deoxidants present and
their capacity to reduce oxygen activity in the molten steel. Only in the
porous weld V was there any indication of a high oxygen level associated
with a low total deoxidant level. The
only compositional parameter which
was significantly correlated with inclusion volume fraction was the Mn/Si
ratio. This has been assumed in the
past to influence the fluidity of the
deoxidation products and thus their
ability to coagulate with each other
and with the top slag. A simple calculation (Ref. 18) shows that flotation
according to Stokes' law is inadequate to explain inclusion removal, a
1 itim inclusion moving only about 1.7
Mm under its own buoyancy in the 5 s
or so for which the pool is molten, but
the concept of inclusions in a turbulent pool impinging on and being
held by the pool surface is attractive
and invites a reappraisal, in future
work, of the role of surface tension in
addition to that of fluidity of the deoxidation products.
WELDING
Ductile Behavior
Given that it may be possible to use
the Mn/Si ratio to control weld cleanliness, it becomes useful to know how
this is related to the mechanical properties of the deposit. It appeared from
the inclusion counts on welds A-H that
a useful correlation existed between
tensile fracture strain e", calculated
as In [100/(100-%RA)] and inclusion
volume fraction V v , as work on other
materials has shown (31). However,
when further welds were examined to
see whether this c o r r e l a t i o n was
maintained over a wider range of
properties, it became clear that the
earlier view was oversimplified. The
complete set of results is shown in
Fig. 9 with the original regression
equation indicated by a dashed line.
The two welds which performed significantly better than predicted from
the inclusion volume fraction alone,
welds L and T, were characterized by
RESEARCH
SUPPLEMENT!
65-3
150
V*
50
40
30
20
o
oo
10
<?%
o
o
i
0
__
oo
-20
30
1
-40
01
02
03
Ot, 05
06 07
Si. V.
06
09
10
11
12
66-s I M A R C H
1976
C l e a v a g e Resistance
In order to explain the variations in
cleavage resistance among the experimental welds, the strengthening
mechanisms at work were first investigated. The good combination of
/g)
2
30
'
s
0
50
40
30
20
o
o
0
j<
0
10
i
o
i
'
'
10
-1 - 6 8 Mn + 630 Ti
370 Al
(11)
1. Deoxidation
practice
affects
both weld inclusion contents and
microstructure and so can influence
resistance to both microvoid coalescence and cleavage fracture.
2. In as-deposited single pass C 0 2
welds with strengths above 450
N/mm 2 (65 ksi), good cleavage resistance is promoted by a fine acicular
ferrite structure and an absence of
d i s p e r s i o n h a r d e n i n g effects. For
welds made at 1.6 k J / m m (60 kJ/in.)
the 0.1 mm (0.004 in.) COD transition
temperature was related to c o m p o s i -
W E L D I N G R E S E A R C H S U P P L E M E N T ! 67-S
Tc
- 1 - 6 8 M n + 6 3 0 Ti
3 7 9 Al
-142+1.87
(% p r o -
eutectoid ferrite)
+ 7 7 1 Ti
w h e r e T c is m e a s u r e d in d e g r e e s C.
3. T h e s e r e l a t i o n s h i p s d i d n o t a p p ly t o a w e l d of 3 9 0 N / m m 2 ( 5 6 k s i )
yield strength, which derived g o o d
t o u g h n e s s f r o m a relatively soft struct u r e w i t h o n l y 1 0 % of a c i c u l a r f e r r i t e .
4 . I n c l u s i o n c o n t e n t s in C 0 2 w e l d s
a r e n o t r e l a t e d t o t h e t o t a l a m o u n t of
deoxidants present unless these are
at s u c h l o w l e v e l s t h a t p o r o s i t y is i m minent. There a p p e a r e d to be a relationship between inclusion content
a n d M n / S i r a t i o in t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l
welds, the cleanest welds being prod u c e d w i t h M n / S i r a t i o s of 3 - 4 in t h e
e l e c t r o d e o r 4 - 5 in t h e d e p o s i t .
5. T h e r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n w e l d
cleanliness a n d resistance to f i b r o u s
f r a c t u r e is n o t s i m p l e b u t d e p e n d s o n
the strength and strain hardening b e h a v i o r of t h e m a t r i x . A s t h e t r i a x i a l i t y
of s t r e s s i n c r e a s e s , m a t r i x p r o p e r t i e s
b e c o m e increasingly important and
high yield strengths and low strain
hardening exponents reduce tearing
resistance.
Acknowledgments
The author is indebted to Dr. R. Week,
Director General of the Welding Institute,
for permission to present this paper. His
thanks are also due to his colleagues and
to Dr. J. F. Knott for many helpful discussions and to Mr. B. G. Ginn and all those
who helped with the experimental work.
References
1 . C h i n , L. L - J . , " A M o d e l f o r
Toughness Studies of Welds,"
Welding
Journal,
48 (8), Aug. 1969, Research
Suppl., 290s-294s.
2. Hill, D. C. and Passoja, D. E.,
"Understanding the Role of Inclusions and
M i c r o s t r u c t u r e in D u c t i l e F r a c t u r e , "
Welding Journal, 53 (11), Nov. 1974, Research Suppl., 481s-485s.
3. Widgery, D. J., "Deoxidation Practice
and Toughness of Mild Steel Weld Metal,"
Welding Research International, 4 (2), Feb.
1974, 54-80.
4. Widgery, D. J., "Deoxidation Practice
and Toughness of Mild Steel Weld Metal Report 2," Welding Institute Members'
Report M/78/74, August 1974.
5. Pollard, B. and Milner, D. R., "Gasmetal Reactions in C 0 2 Welding," Journ.
Iron and Steel Inst., 209 (4), Apr. 1971,
291-300.
1966. 1396-1404.
22. Steel, A. C , "The Effects of Sulphur
and Phosphorus on the Toughness of Mild
Steel Weld Metal," Welding Institute M e m bers' Report M / 6 4 / 7 1 , July 1971.
23. Stumpf, W. E. and Sellars, C. M.,
"Measurement of Particle Density and
Volume Fraction from
Extraction
Replicas," Metallography,
1 (1), Jan. 1968,
25-34.
24. M c l n t y r e , P. and Priest, A. H.,
" M e a s u r e m e n t of S u b - C r i t i c a l Flaw
Growth by the DC Electrical Resistance
Technique," British Iron and Steel Research A s s o c i a t i o n Report M G / 5 4 / 7 1 ,
June 1971.
25. M i r a b i l e , M. a n d P a l o m b i , E.,
"Dependence of Stress Wave Emission
upon Brittle and Ductile Fracture Mechanisms," Third International Conference
on Fracture, Munich, 1973, Vol III, Paper II234.
26. Born, K., "Zusammensetzung und
Form nichtmetallischer EinschlCisse in
L i c h t b o g e n s c h w e i s s u n g e n , " Stahl
und
Eisen, 74 (13), 1954, 822-831.
27. North, T. H. and Wallace, E. P.,
" P r o p e r t i e s of 2 ' / 2 % C r - 1 % M o Welds,"
W e l d i n g of C r e e p R e s i s t a n t S t e e l s ,
Welding Institute Conference, Newcastle
upon Tyne, 1970, 115-125.
28. Tuliani, S. S., Boniszewski, T. and
E a t o n , N. F., " N o t c h T o u g h n e s s of
Commercial S u b m e r g e d - A r c Weld Metal,"
Welding and Metal Fabrication,
37 (8),
Aug. 1969, 327-339.
29. Sekiguchi, H., Theory and Proposal
on Steel
Fusion
Welding
and
their
Applications,
Nikkan Kogyo Shinbun,
Tokyo, 1964.
30. Darken, L. S. and Gurry, R. W.,
Physical Chemistry
of Metals, McGrawHill, p 4 9 1 .
31. Edelson, B. I. and Baldwin, W. M.,
ASM Transactions
Quarterly,
35, 1962,
230-250.
32. Dolby, R. E., Saunders, G. G. and
Widgery, D. J., "Metallurgical Factors C o n trolling the Fracture Toughness of Weld
Microstructures, with Particular Reference to the Micromechansim of Fracture
Initiation," The Practical Implications of
Fracture Mechanisms, Conf. P r o c , Institution of Metallurgists, London. 1973, 54-62.
33. Schwartzbart, H. and Brown, W. F.
Jr., " N o t c h - B a r Tensile P r o p e r t i e s of
Various Materials and their Relation to the
Unnotch Flow Curve and Notch Sharpness," ASM Transactions
Quarterly, 46,
1954, 998-1020.
34. McClintock, F. A., "A Criterion for
Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes,"
Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35 (2), Feb.
1968, 363-371.
35. Comstock, G. F., Titanium in Iron
and Steel, John Wiley and Sons, New York,
1955, 103-112.
36. Sawhill, J. M. Jr. and Wada, T.,
"Properties of Welds in Low Carbon M n Mo-Cb Line Pipe Steels," Welding Journal,
54(1), Jan. 1975, Research Suppl.. 1s-11s.
The American Welding Society publishes over a hundred different Codes, Standards,
Recommended Practices, Guides, Handbooks and other books related to welding. If you
would like a copy of our Publications List, simply circle No. 150 on our Reader Info-Card
and mail it.
68-s I
MARCH
1976