Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/ejcts
TE
Received 24 February 2005; received in revised form 10 May 2005; accepted 11 May 2005; Available online 1 July 2005
Abstract
ET
AC
Objective: This retrospective study aims to compare the early and late clinical and management aspects of tracheobronchial aspirated
foreign body (AFB), to evaluate the factors associated with delayed diagnosis of foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children and to compare
clinical, radiological and bronchoscopic findings in the patients with suspected FBA. A retrospective review of a 10-year experience (from 1995
to 2005). A 1512-bed Mansoura University Hospital and 184-bed Mansoura University Emergency Hospital. Methods: The medical records of 3300
patients who underwent bronchoscopy for suspected FBA were reviewed. The data were analysed in three groups: the patients with negative
bronchoscopy for FBA (group I), early (group II) and delayed diagnosis (group III). Foreign body was removed using the rigid bronchoscope with or
without using the extracting forceps (Egyptian novel technique [Sersar IS, Abdulla AK, Abulela SA, Elsaeid AS, Abdulmageed NA. A novel
technique to remove an inhaled foreign body without using a forceps. J Cardiovasc Dis 2004;2(4):1578] described in the hand made illustration).
Results: The majority of the patients with FBA were between 3 and 10 years of age. The penetration syndrome and decreased breath sounds
were determined in a significantly higher number of the patients with FBA. The plain chest radiography revealed radio-opaque foreign bodies
(FBs) in 23.56% of all patients with FBA. Pneumonia and atelectasis were significantly more common in the groups with negative bronchoscopy
and with delayed diagnosis (P!0.01). The FBs were most frequently of vegetable origin, such as seeds and peanuts. A significant tissue reaction
with inflammation and postbronchoscopic complications were more common in the delayed cases. The novel technique was used since then in
100 cases (4.62%) with a history of FBI (Pins and or small rounded materials). It was successful in 73 (73%) cases of non-impacted inhaled pins. Use
of forceps was needed in 21 (21%) cases. Rebronchoscopy despite using both techniques was needed in six (6%) cases within 72 h. Failed
extraction of the inhaled FB occurred in three cases (3%) for whom bronchotomy was needed. Conclusions: Bronchoscopy is indicated on
appropriate history and on suspicion. To prevent delayed diagnosis, characteristic symptoms, signs and radiological findings of FBA should be
checked in all suspected cases. As clinical and radiological findings of FBA in delayed cases may mimic other disorders, the clinician must be
aware of the likelihood of FBA.
Q 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: Foreign bodies; Radiography; Bronchoscopy
1. Introduction
AC
TE
370
ET
Table 1
The demographic data of the patients
Data
Group 2
Group 3
P-value
Number
Age (months)
Positive bronchoscopy
Right
Left
Central
Both right and left
!1 year
13 years
310 years
O10 years
Female/male
1900
43.2 (1.5292)
C
770
984
139
7
155
609
929
207
1004/896
265
23.5 (5251)
C
53
200
6
6
103
82
63
17
128/137
!0.05
O0.05
O0.05
!0.05
!0.05
!0.05
!0.05
O0.05
O0.05
!0.05
!0.05
371
Table 2
The clinical, radiological data and complications of the procedures
Data
Group 2
Group 3
P-value
Witnessed choking
Sudden persistent cough
Tachypnoea
Fever
Decreased breath sounds
Chest X-ray
Normal chest X-ray
Pneumonia
Atelectasis
Radio-opaque FB
Duration of symptoms in days
Complications
1. Arrest
Reversible
Irreversible
2. Major airway injury
3. Barotruma
4. Failure
a. Rebronchoscopy
b. Re-rebronchoscopy
c. Bronchotomy
5. Pulmonary resections
6. Laryngeal oedema
1435 (75.52%)
1429 (75.21%)
992 (52.21%)
86 (9.55%)
841 (44.26%)
1820 (95.78%)
1148 (60.42%)
75 (3.94%)
130 (6.84%)
467 (24.57%)
(172 h)
18 (6.79%)
34 (12.38%)
40 (15.09%)
80 (30.18%)
78 (29.43%)
260 (98.11%)
91 (34.33%)
72 (27.16%)
85 (32.07%)
12 (4.52%)
73653 days
!0.05
!0.05
!0.05
!0.05
!0.05
O0.05
!0.05
!0.05
O0.05
!0.05
!0.05
60
50
10
4
5
19
19
14
7
7
19
TE
67
63
4
0
3
25
25
10
6
0
34
ET
!0.05
!0.05
O0.05
!0.05
!0.05
O0.05
!0.05
!0.05
AC
3. Results
Fig. 4. (A) CT chest Mediastinal window showing FBI in the right upper lobe
bronchus. (B) CT chest Pulmonary window showing FBI in the right upper lobe
bronchus.
AC
TE
372
ET
FBs are listed in Table 1. The majority of the FBs were located
in the bronchus and there was no statistically significant
difference for the left and the right sides for both groups. The
organic foreign bodies included peanut, organic materials,
Walnut, Carrot, Apple, Sunflower, Chickpea, peach tail,
tangrene tail, coffee bean, organic pip, crystallised fruit,
Coconut, Pistachio, Almond, Soya, Dried cereal, Popcorn.
The inorganic foreign bodies included plastics, plastic peg,
plastic pearl, toy and pins.
Review of the bronchoscopy reports showed that
significant tissue reaction was more common in group III.
While inflammation and granulation tissue around the object
with copious mucoid, purulent secretion was determined in
most of the patients in the group with delayed presentation.
In all but one of the 44 patients, the FB was removed
successfully with one trial of rigid bronchoscopes under
general anaesthesia. Only 20 patients needed bronchotomy
or pulmonary resections. Our Egyptian novel technique
(Sersar Technique) was introduced in 2004 April and was
used since then in 100 cases (4.62%) with a history of FBI
(Pins and or small rounded materials). It was successful in 73
(73%) cases of non-impacted inhaled pins and rounded
organic materials (Illustration) (Fig. 5). It is simply rigid
bronchoscopic removal of inhaled foreign bodies without
using a forceps but using the postural drainage assisted with
suction. All the patients with suspected FBI were admitted in
our centre at least for 24 h. The longest hospital stay was
24 days. In group III, it ranged from 2 to 24 days.
4. Discussion
Fig. 3. (A) Plain X-ray chest showing a nearly left total opacity with ipsilateral
mediastinal shift due to an organic FB. (BE) CT chest showing a nearly total
lung collapse with ipsilateral mediastinal shift due to an organic foreign body.
TE
AC
R
ET
373
Acknowledgements
The authors present their thanks to Professor Mohammed
Mounir Elsaeid, MD, Professor Shabban A. Abulela, MD and
Professor Abed Abdel Samea Mowafy, MD for their assistance, advice and support.
References
[1] Sersar IS, Abdulla AK, Abulela SA, Elsaeid As, Abdulmageed NA. A novel
technique to remove an inhaled foreign body without using a forceps.
J Cardiovasc Dis 2004;2(4):1578.
[2] Johnson DG, Condon VR. Foreign bodies in pediatric patients. Curr Probl
Surg 1998;35:2739.
[3] Black RE, Johnson DG, Matlak ME. Bronchoscopic removal of aspirated
foreign bodies in children. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:6824.
[4] Metrangelo S, Monetti C, Meneghini L, Zadra N, Giusti F. Eight years
experience with foreign-body aspiration in children: what is really
important for a timely diagnosis? J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:122931.
[5] Svedstrom E, Puhakka H, Kero P. How accurate is chest radiography in
the diagnosis of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children? Pediatr
Radiol 1989;19:5202.
[6] Swischuk LE. The chest. In: Swischuk LE, editor. Emergency imaging of
the acutely ill or injured child. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams &
Wilkins; 1994. p. 1150.
[7] Vane DW, Pritchard J, Colville CW, West KW, Eigen H, Grosfeld JL.
Bronchoscopy for aspirated foreign bodies in children. Arch Surg 1988;
123:8858.
[8] Zerella JT, Dimler M, McGill LC, Pippus KJ. Foreign body aspiration in
children: value of radiography and complications of bronchoscopy.
J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:16514.
[9] Pasaoglu I, Dogan R, Demircin M, Hatipoglu A, Bozer AY. Bronchoscopic
removal of foreign bodies in children: retrospective analysis of 822
cases. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;39:958.
[10] Zaytoun GM, Rouadi PW, Baki DH. Endoscopic management of foreign
bodies in the tracheobronchial tree: predictive factors for complications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:3116.
[11] Vining DJ, Liu K, Choplin RH, Haponik EF. Virtual bronchoscopy:
relationships of virtual reality endobronchial simulations to actual
bronchoscopic findings. Chest 1996;109:54953.
[12] Ferretti GR, Vining DJ, Knoplioch J, Coulomb M. Tracheobronchial tree:
three-dimensional spiral CT with bronchoscopic perspective. J Comput
Assist Tomogr 1996;20:77781.
[13] Fleiter T, Merkle EM, Aschoff AJ, Lang G, Stein M, Gorich J, Liewald F,
Rilinger N, Sokiranski R. Comparison of real-time virtual and fiberoptic
bronchoscopy in patients with bronchial carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol
1997;169:15915.
[14] Higgins WE, Ramaswamy K, Swift RD, McLennan G, Hoffman EA. Virtual
bronchoscopy for three-dimensional pulmonary image assessment: state
of the art and future needs. Radio-Graphics 1998;18:76178.
[15] McAdams HP, Goodman PC, Kussin P. Virtual bronchoscopy for directing
transbronchial needle aspiration of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes: a
pilot study. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:13614.
[16] Haponik EF, Aquino SL, Vining DJ. Virtual bronchoscopy. Clin Chest Med
1999;20:20117.
[17] Burke AJ, Vining DJ, McGuirt Jr WF, Postma G, Browne JD. Evaluation of
airway obstruction using virtual endoscopy. Laryngoscope 2000;110:
239.
[18] Konen E, Katz M, Rozenman J, Ben-Shlush A, Itzchak Y, Szeinberg A.
Virtual bronchoscopy in children: early clinical experience. Am
J Roentgenol 1998;171:1699702.
[19] Lam WW, Tam PK, Chan FL, Chan KL, Cheng W. Esophageal atresia and
tracheal stenosis: use of three-dimensional CT and virtual bronchoscopy
in neonates, infants, and children. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:100912.
ET
AC
A convincing history and suspicious plain chest radiography are the two main criteria for the need for bronchoscopic
diagnosis of FBA. Most of our patients come to our
emergency hospital. Their parents are not aware with our
primary care system. They just come to the hospital whether
the emergency or the paediatric hospital where they are
referred to us. The indication for bronchotomy in our
patients was failed three trials of bronchoscopic removal
of an impacted organic FB with distal airway obstruction
whether partial or complete or failed bronchoscopic removal
of an impacted inorganic FB with or without symptoms for
fear of the inflammatory response. The indications for
pulmonary resections were not for FB but for destroyed
segment, lobe or lung and the FB was accidentally found.
In the presence of normal radiographs and a strong
history, the radiologist and clinician, depending on their
experiences and facilities, should decide whether the child
should undergo fluoroscopy or bronchoscopy. If an expiratory
film cannot be obtained due to lack of cooperation, or
negative radiological findings are present, then fluoroscopy
may help to detect the presence of a FB. If present, air
trapping and shift of mediastinal structures to the opposite
side can be easily identified at fluoroscopy. We do rigid
bronchoscopy for suspected history with any chest trouble
with persistent radiologic abnormalities. Although CT
occasionally demonstrates an opacity not visualised on the
plain film, it should not be considered as one of the initial
diagnostic methods for FBA. CT may help with the
differential diagnosis of suspected cases having atypical
histories, clinical and radiological findings with delayed
presentation and complications. The differential diagnosis in
such cases include tracheobronchial obstructions caused by
external compression of airways (e.g. enlarged lymph node,
tumours, cardiac enlargement) or intra-luminal obstructions
(e.g. tumours, granulomatous tissue, as in tuberculosis,
secretions and mucous plugs as in bacterial pneumonia,
cystic fibrosis, asthma, pulmonary abscess and acute
laryngotracheobronchitis). Virual bronchoscopy was done
for three cases. It was helpful to diagnose an endobronchial
obstruction. Rigid bronchoscopy showed the FBI as the cause
of this obstruction.
Children with FBA may present with atypical or misleading history, clinical and radiological findings. Misdiagnosis
such as asthma, pneumonia, croup and reactive airway
diseases may lead to a delayed diagnosis. To prevent
complications caused by delayed diagnosis, the clinician
must maintain a high index of suspicion. In suspected cases,
a more extensive history and physical examination should be
obtained. Regardless of radiological findings, when FBA is
the suspected diagnosis in a patient with a history of a
witnessed episode of choking, a transient cyanosis and
coughing, an early bronchoscopic examination should be
considered. Negative radiography and fluoroscopy should not
preclude bronchoscopy in patients with a strong history.
TE
374