Stan J.

Caterbone
MOVANT
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
717-459-7588 Fax

August 19, 2015

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT & STAN J. CATERBONE

Both victims of PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT By a Criminal Enterprise

ATTACHED IS MY 1998 AFFIDAVIT TO THE HONORABLE STEWART DALZALL,
U.S. DISTRIT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
The following is a copy of the 1998 AFFIDAVIT to Judge Dalzall. The original file is
the original complaint filed on May 16, 2005 for Case No. 05-2288 in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; however the document is not viewable
on the U.S. District Court Court Filing System. I do not know why.

The affidavit

was delivered on a CD-ROM to an Inbox outside the chambers of Judge Stewart

Dalzall. Back at that time the public could access the halls of the chambers to U.S.
District Judges in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Also attached is the DOCKET for Lisa Michelle Lambert's 2014 Habeus Corpus
which I am a party, as being named the MOVANT on June 23, 2015 with the filing of
my AMICUS.

Given the preponderance of evidence associated with this affidavit, the

courts must conclude that In The United States District Court For The Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart Dalzalls findings of April 14, 1997,
in the Lisa Lambert case identifying acts of Prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by
virtue of this affidavit, now discloses evidence of a bona fide pattern of
prosecutorial misconduct, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the
County of Lancaster. Criminal law must now determine if these disclosures would
warrant investigations of a possible criminal enterprise.

Page 2

This affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact
that this affidavit compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would
tip the scales of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights.. In the
truthfulness of this affidavit, The Commonwealth must concede Lisa Michelle
Lambert to balance the scales of justice, which no other act could accomplish.
The Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert
to the superior matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by its own
admission of wrongdoing, assuring the peoples of its commitment to administer
equalities of justice, not inequalities of justice. Balancing the scales of justice.
Anything less, would take the full scope of jurisdiction out of the boundaries of
our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the Constitution of the United
States. The plaintiff must be restored to whole.
I was not defending the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert, but
rather assaulting the judicial integrity of the Lancaster County Judicial System,
from first-hand experience; and making the point that such conduct eludes every
major stakeholder from the truth and justice prosecution and defense alike.

Respectfully,

Stan J. Caterbone

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?121153035547044-L_1_0-1

CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R

United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:14-cv-02559-PD

LAMBERT v. BISSONETTE et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND
Cause: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Date Filed: 05/02/2014

Date Terminated: 05/22/2014
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus: (General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Petitioner
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT

represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY H. GONZALEZ IBRAHIM
P.O. BOX 1025
CHADDS FORD, PA 19317
215-568-1943
Email: jeremyibrahim.esq@verizon.net
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Respondent
LYNN BISSONETTE
SUPERINTENDENT, MCI-FRAMINGHAM
Respondent
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
V.
Movant
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1 of 2

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
PRO SE

Date Filed

# Docket Text

05/02/2014

1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 100526.), filed by LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT.
(Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ks, ) (Entered: 05/05/2014)

05/22/2014

2 CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE
PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/22/14. 5/22/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd) (Entered: 05/22/2014)

05/22/2014

3 ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S COUNSEL. ACCORDINGLY HER HABEAS
PETITION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A COUNSELED MOTION FOR RELIEF.
COUNSEL SHOULD BE PREPARED TO ADDRESS WHETHER PETITIONER MUST SEEK PERMISSION FROM THE COURT
OF APPEALS BEFORE FILING A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S.
DIAMOND ON 5/22/14. 5/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) (Entered:
05/23/2014)

06/23/2015

4 BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP IN SUPPORT OF
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT'S HABEAU CORPUS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(jpd) (Entered: 06/25/2015)

07/06/2015

5 STATEMENT OF MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (jpd, ) (Entered: 07/07/2015)

08/14/2015

6 LETTER FROM STAN J. CATERBONE DATED 8/7/15 ADDRESSED TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER AND
THE HONORABLE JUDGE PAUL S. DIAMOND RE: ELECTRONIC CASE FILING PRIVILEGES. (jpd) (Entered: 08/14/2015)

8/19/2015 1:16 AM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?121153035547044-L_1_0-1

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
08/19/2015 01:14:50
PACER Login: am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Description:

Docket Report

Billable Pages: 2

2 of 2

Search Criteria: 5:14-cv-02559-PD

Cost:

0.20

8/19/2015 1:16 AM

advantage for lack of legal training. "The right of self-representation is not a license to abuse
the dignity of the courtroom. Neither is it a license not to comply with relevant rules of
procedural and substantive law." Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806,834 n. 46,95 S.Ct.
2525,2541 n. 46,45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).

In the instant case, Plaintiff has no greater right to be heard than he would have if he were
represented by counsel. As a pro se litigant, Plaintiff, in essence, stands in the place of an
attorney. Plaintiffs request for an ex parte meeting with the Court in this case violates Rule
3.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct because it is clear that Plaintiff seeks to influence
the Court with his version of events, without providing defense counsel any opportunity to
respond.' Since an ex parte meeting with the Court would violate the Rules of Professional
Conduct and provide Plaintiff an unfair advantage over Defendants, Plaintiffs request for
such a meeting should be refused.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The following is copy of an Affidavit that was filed on January 31, 1998 in the chambers of
Honorable Stewart Dalzell in a desperate attempt for due process of the issues contained
herein. In November of 1997 the PLAINTIFF sought the counsel of Ms. Christina Rainville
while employed by the firm of Schnader, Harrison, Segal and Lewis. This was the last
attempt by the PLAINTIFF of seeking competent legal counsel. Ms. Rainville acknowledged
and communicated to the PLAINTIFF that the firm had barred her from representing any
additional clients from Lancaster County shortly after the PLAINTIFFs solicitation; which she
had plenty of solicitations from other potential Lancaster County clients. In the document
titled Plaintiff Finding of Facts it is clearly documented that the PLAINTIFF did attempt to
solicit and retain several competent lawyers since 1987, all of who displayed conflicts of
interests, and some went so far as to violate rules of ethics concerning client/attorney
privilege. PLAINTIFFs filing as Pro Se Litigant was the only alternative available that would
protect and preserve the PLAINTIFFs legal standing and right to due process. The following
excerpt from the Affidavit will demonstrate to the court a factual account of the events that
precluded and provided the Plaintiff the legal standing to file the original complaint on May
16, 2005.

Confidential

Page 2

6/12/2006

AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART DALZELL

I, Stanley J. Caterbone being duly sworn according to law, make the following affidavit
concerning the years during which I was maliciously and purposefully mentally abused,
subjected to a massive array of prosecutorial misconduct, while enduring an exhaustive
fight for the sovereignty of my constitutional rights, shareholder rights, civil liberties, and
right of due access to the law. I will detail a deliberate attempt on my life, in 1991, exhibiting
the dire consequences of this complaint. These allegations are substantiated through a
preponderance of evidence including but not limited to over 10,000 documents, over 50
hours of recorded conversations, transcripts, and archived on several digital mediums. A
Findings of Facts is attached herewith providing merits and the facts pertaining to this
affidavit.

These issues and incidents identified herein have attempted to conceal my

disclosures of International Signal & Control, Plc. However, the merits of the violations
contained in this affidavit will be proven incidental to the existence of any conspiracy.
The plaintiff protests the courts for all remedial actions mandated by law.

Financial

considerations would exceed $1 million.

These violations began on June 23, 1987 while I was a resident and business owner in
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and have continued to the present. These issues are a
direct consequence of my public disclosure of fraud within International Signal & Control,
Plc., of County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and state
statutes governing my shareholder rights granted in 1983, when I purchased my interests in
International Signal & Control., Plc.. I will also prove intentional undo influence against
family and friends towards compromising the credibility of myself, with malicious and selfserving accusations of insanity. I conclude that the courts must provide me with fair
access to the law, and most certainly, the process must void any technical
deficiencies found in this filing as being material to the conclusions. Such arrogance
by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our Constitution.

Confidential

Page 3

6/12/2006

1. The activities contained herein may raise the argument of fair disclosure regarding the
scope of law pertaining to issues and activities compromising the National Security of the
United States. The Plaintiff will successfully argue that due to the criminal record of
International Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer of arms and technologies to an
end user Iraq, the laws of disclosure must be forfeited by virtue that said activities posed
a direct compromise to the National Security of the United States.; the plaintiff will argue
that his public allegations of misconduct within the operations of International Signal &
Control, Plc., as early as June of 1987 ;demonstrated actions were proven to protect the
National Security of the United States..

The activities of International Signal & Control,

Pls., placed American troops in harms way. The plaintiffs actions should have taken the
American troops out of harms way causing the activities of the International Signal &
Control, Plc., to cease and desist. .
All activities contained herein have greatly compromised the National Security of the
United States, and the laws of jurist prudence must apply towards the Plaintiffs intent and
motive of protecting the rights of his fellow citizens. Had the plaintiff been protected
under the law, and subsequently had the law enforcement community of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County of Lancaster administer justice, United
States troops may have been taken out of harms way, as a direct result of ceasing the
operations of International Signal & Control, Plc., in as early as 1987.
2. The plaintiff will successfully prove that the following activities and the prosecutorial
misconduct were directed at intimidating the plaintiff from continuing his public
disclosures regarding illegal activities within International Signal & Control, Plc,. On June
23, 1998, International Signal & Control, Plc was negotiating for the $1.14 billion merger
with Ferranti International, of England.

Such disclosures threatened the integrity of

International Signal & Controls organization, and Mr. James Guerin himself, ,
consequently resulting in adverse financial considerations to all parties if such disclosures
provided any reason to question the integrity of the transaction, which later became the
central criminal activity in the in The United States District Court For The Eastern District
Of Pennsylvania.

Confidential

Page 4

6/12/2006

3. The plaintiff will prove that undo influence was also responsible for the adverse
consequences and fabricated demise of his business enterprises and personal holdings.
The dire consequences of the plaintiffs failed business dealings will demonstrate and
substantiate financial incentive and motive.

Defendants responsible for administering

undo influence and interference in the plaintiffs business and commercial enterprises had
financial interests. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a taxing authority, Lancaster
County had a great investment whos demise would facilitate grave consequences to its
economic development. .

Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon) would have less

competition in the mortgage banking business and other financial services, violating the
lender liability laws. The Steinman Enterprises, Inc., would loose a pioneer in the
information technologies industries, and would protect the public domain from truthful
disclosure. The plaintiff will also provide significant evidence of said perpetrators violating
common laws governing intellectual property rights.
4. Given the plaintiffs continued and obstructed right to due process of the law, beginning in
June of 1987 and continuing to the present, the plaintiff must be given fair access to the
law with the opportunity for any and all remedial actions required under the federal and
state statutes. The plaintiff will successfully argue his rights to the courts to rightfully
claim civil actions with regards to the totality of these activities, so described in the
following Findings of Facts, regardless of any statute of limitations. Given the plaintiffs
genuine efforts for due process has been inherently and maliciously obstructed, the
courts must provide the opportunity for any and all remedial actions deserving to the
plaintiff.
5. Under current laws, the plaintiffs intellectual capacity has been exploited as means of
discrediting the plaintiffs disclosures and obstructing the plaintiffs right to due process of
the law.

The plaintiff has always had the proper rights under federal and state laws to

enter into contract. The logic and reason towards the plaintiffs activities and actions are
a matter of record, demonstrated in the Findings of Facts, contained herein..
The plaintiff will argue and successfully prove that the inherent emotional consequences
to all of the activities contained herein have resulted in Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.

Confidential

Page 5

6/12/2006

The evidence of the stress subjected to the plaintiff, will prove to be the direct result of the
activities contained herein, rather than the exhibited behavior of any mental deficiency the
plaintiff may or may not have. The courts must provide for the proper interpretations of all
laws, irrespective of the plaintiffs alleged intellectual capacity. The plaintiff successfully
argue that his mental capacity is of very little legal consequence, if any; other than in its
malicious representations used to diminish the credibility of the plaintiff.
6. The plaintiff will demonstrate that the following incidents of illegal prosecutions were
purposefully directed at intimidating the plaintiff from further public disclosure into the
activities of International Signal & Control, Plc., consequently obstructing the plaintiffs
access to due process of the law. Due to the fact that these activities to which the
plaintiffs perpetrators were protecting were illegal activities, the RICO statutes would
apply.
To this day, the plaintiff has never been convicted of any crime with the exception of 2
speeding tickets. The following report identifies 34 instances of prosecutorial misconduct
during the prosecutions and activities beginning on June 23, 1987 and continuing to
today.
7) Given the preponderance of evidence associated with this affidavit, the courts must
conclude that In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart Dalzalls findings of April 14, 1997, in the Lisa
Lambert case identifying acts of Prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of this affidavit,
now discloses evidence of a bona fide pattern of prosecutorial misconduct, in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of Lancaster. Criminal law must now
determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible criminal
enterprise. This affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact that
this affidavit compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the scales
of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights..
In the truthfulness of this affidavit, The Commonwealth must concede Lisa Michelle
Lambert to balance the scales of justice, which no other act could accomplish. The

Confidential

Page 6

6/12/2006

Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert to the superior
matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by its own admission of wrongdoing,
assuring the peoples of its commitment to administer equalities of justice, not inequalities
of justice. Balancing the scales of justice. Anything less, would take the full scope of
jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the
Constitution of the United States. The plaintiff must be restored to whole.

I was not defending the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert, but rather assaulting
the judicial integrity of the Lancaster County Judicial System, from first-hand experience;
and making the point that such conduct eludes every major stakeholder from the truth
and justice prosecution and defense alike.

Confidential

Page 7

6/12/2006

!" #

,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
/
/

#
9
"
"
!
3
,

9
"
!
3
,

#
9
"
!
3
,

/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
/
/

,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
"
"
/ /
"
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ 3/
!
/ 3/
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
/ ,/
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
!/ #/
3
!/ #/
3

$ % &'
$&()*%& (* & +$+
$*(
(+ +%
- ( & .+
+ /0+$-.( 0%/%*$1 2+ $'
,3! $*
3

! "$
$4
1
5
4
/.
/.
, 1 2 6 78 6 (
1
5
4
/.
/.
## 9
6
4 8 1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#
)
6 :1
5
4
/.
/.
#!
6(
:1
5
4
/.
/.
#,
$4 8 ): 2 678 $ ;
* .
< # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 #5
4
/.
/.
3=
# ==
.
6:
12
6 %
10 4
7 > 7
3 = #, " == 9 $4 8 *8
1 @
*8
0 4
7 > 7
3 = ! , == ! 1
(
+
4
0 4
7 >
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
3="
==
(
42
/
& .
> 7
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = !3" == *
A 4 0/* ( @B
(
%
6 :
3=
# == 9/ .
- C
/ 4: *88 %
6 :
3=
! == / *
- 47 : %
6 :
#/ 3 = ! , == # 1
*8
0/%
% 66
! =#
== / .
$ 88
6.
%
6 : % 66
3=
9(
/* 4
7& 8
3/ 9/
" D9!!
#
3 = , 3 ==
; ( / 66/& *88 0
3/ 9/
" D9!!
% 66
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = #! 9 ==
6
.
3/ 9/
" % 66
! = #3
== E .2+F
+
/+
8.
8 6: % 66
$(
3# 1 3 .
2
:
:6
6
$(
3# 1 3 .2+ 4
:
.*$
6
8 6
:

?
?
?
?

)6
G!
(&. G

++ /

,3! - ( & .+
+
*2$-&(% (& +*%

6+ 8

&$-+
&

6& 4
8

&. *2$ * ! - ( &.

* + & - ( & .+
+

&. *( *A&($2(%&. *%

&

6(

6 : > ,3#?

*% +.&( $+*%

>& 4

? !1

!"
#

# (

%
= 3#

(
*(
+
!(

&'
9
@

'

8 62

9
#

= 3#

8
'

(
*(
!( ,
-(
.(
"(
-

!( 3

*B

66 : >

,,9?

88B

> ,,"? /
1

( 2
*( 3

'

#
,

,
4

scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
March 14, 2010
Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.

14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19. TOBIAS FROG RESTUARANT & BAR, August 16, 2015 by Female Owner, For Posting on FACEBOOK Complaints
about Harassment by Staff and Gang Stalkers, No Notice.

August
2015
Dated: March
29,19,
2010