You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices 9159

of safety that is equivalent to, or greater obtaining an exemption from the vision evidence submitted and, if safety is
than, the level that would be achieved requirements (70 FR 71884; 71 FR 4632; being compromised or if continuation of
absent such exemption.’’ The 71 FR 4194; 71 FR 13450). Each of these the exemption would not be consistent
procedures for requesting an exemption 8 applicants has requested renewal of with the goals and objectives of 49
(including renewals) are set out in 49 the exemption and has submitted U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will
CFR part 381. evidence showing that the vision in the take immediate steps to revoke the
better eye continues to meet the exemption of a driver.
Exemption Decision standard specified at 49 CFR Issued on: February 11, 2008.
This notice addresses 8 individuals 391.41(b)(10) and that the vision
Larry W. Minor,
who have requested a renewal of their impairment is stable. In addition, a
exemption in accordance with FMCSA review of each record of safety while Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
procedures. FMCSA has evaluated these driving with the respective vision
8 applications for renewal on their deficiencies over the past two years [FR Doc. E8–2982 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am]
merits and decided to extend each indicates each applicant continues to BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P

exemption for a renewable two-year meet the vision exemption standards.


period. They are: These factors provide an adequate basis
for predicting each driver’s ability to DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
John R. Alger
Gene Bartlett, Jr. continue to drive safely in interstate Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Marland L. Brassfield commerce. Therefore, FMCSA Administration
Billy R. Jeffries concludes that extending the exemption
for each renewal applicant for a period [Docket Nos FMCSA 01–10678, FMCSA 03–
John P. Rodrigues
of two years is likely to achieve a level 16241]
Robert V. Sloan
Gary N. Wilson of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption. Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
William B. Wilson Renewals; Vision
These exemptions are extended Request for Comments
subject to the following conditions: (1) AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
FMCSA will review comments Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
That each individual have a physical received at any time concerning a
examination every year (a) by an ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
particular driver’s safety record and
ophthalmologist or optometrist who determine if the continuation of the SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
attests that the vision in the better eye exemption is consistent with the announced its decision to renew the
continues to meet the standard in 49 requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and exemptions from the vision requirement
CFR 391.41(b)(10), and (b) by a medical 31315. However, FMCSA requests that in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
examiner who attests that the individual interested parties with specific data Regulations for 10 individuals. FMCSA
is otherwise physically qualified under concerning the safety records of these has statutory authority to exempt
49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual drivers submit comments by March 20, individuals from the vision requirement
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s 2008. if the exemptions granted will not
or optometrist’s report to the medical FMCSA believes that the
compromise safety. The Agency has
examiner at the time of the annual requirements for a renewal of an
reviewed the comments submitted in
medical examination; and (3) that each exemption under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
response to the previous announcement
individual provide a copy of the annual 31315 can be satisfied by initially
and concluded that granting these
medical certification to the employer for granting the renewal and then
exemptions will provide a level of safety
retention in the driver’s qualification requesting and evaluating, if needed,
that will be equivalent to, or greater
file and retain a copy of the certification subsequent comments submitted by
than, the level of safety maintained
on his/her person while driving for interested parties. As indicated above,
without the exemptions for these
presentation to a duly authorized the Agency previously published
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
Federal, State, or local enforcement notices of final disposition announcing
its decision to exempt these 8 drivers.
official. Each exemption will be valid
for two years unless rescinded earlier by individuals from the vision requirement FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
FMCSA. The exemption will be in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
rescinded if: (1) The person fails to decision to grant an exemption to each Programs, (202) 366–4001,
comply with the terms and conditions of these individuals was based on the fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has merits of each case and only after Department of Transportation, 1200
resulted in a lower level of safety than careful consideration of the comments New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
was maintained before it was granted; or received to its notices of applications. 224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
(3) continuation of the exemption would The notices of applications stated in Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to
not be consistent with the goals and detail the qualifications, experience, 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and and medical condition of each applicant Federal holidays.
31315. for an exemption from the vision SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
requirements. That information is
Basis for Renewing Exemptions Electronic Access
available by consulting the above cited
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an Federal Register publications. You may see all the comments online
exemption may be granted for no longer Interested parties or organizations through the Federal Document
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

than two years from its approval date possessing information that would Management System (FDMS) at http://
and may be renewed upon application otherwise show that any, or all of these www.regulations.gov.
for additional two year periods. In drivers, are not currently achieving the
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and statutory level of safety should Background
31315, each of the 8 applicants has immediately notify FMCSA. The Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
satisfied the entry conditions for Agency will evaluate any adverse FMCSA may grant an exemption for a

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Feb 15, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM 19FEN1
9160 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices

2-year period if it finds ‘‘such Issued on: February 11, 2008. 2007. The comment period ended on
exemption would likely achieve a level Larry W. Minor, January 18, 2008.
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater Associate Administrator for Policy and
Discussion of Comments
than, the level that would be achieved Program Development.
absent such exemption.’’ The statutes [FR Doc. E8–2983 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am] FMCSA received one comment in this
also allow the Agency to renew BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P proceeding. The comment is considered
exemptions at the end of the 2-year and discussed below.
period. The Notice was published on Advocates for Highway and Auto
December 19, 2007. The comment DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Safety (Advocates) expressed opposition
period ended on January 18, 2008. to FMCSA’s policy to grant exemptions
Federal Motor Carrier Safety from the FMCSR, including the driver
Discussion of Comments Administration qualification standards. Specifically,
FMCSA received one comment in this Advocates: (1) Objects to the manner in
[Docket Nos FMCSA–99–5748, FMCSA–99–
proceeding. The comment is considered 6156, FMCSA–01–10578, FMCSA–05–22194] which FMCSA presents driver
and discussed below. information to the public and makes
Advocates for Highway and Auto Qualification of Drivers; Exemption safety determinations; (2) objects to the
Safety (Advocates) expressed opposition Renewals; Vision Agency’s reliance on conclusions drawn
to FMCSA’s policy to grant exemptions from the vision waiver program; (3)
from the FMCSR, including the driver AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety claims the Agency has misinterpreted
qualification standards. Specifically, Administration (FMCSA), DOT. statutory language on the granting of
Advocates: (1) Objects to the manner in ACTION: Notice of final disposition. exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
which FMCSA presents driver 31315); and finally (4) suggests that a
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
information to the public and makes 1999 Supreme Court decision affects the
announced its decision to renew the
safety determinations; (2) objects to the legal validity of vision exemptions.
exemptions from the vision requirement
Agency’s reliance on conclusions drawn The issues raised by Advocates were
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
from the vision waiver program; (3) addressed at length in 64 FR 51568
Regulations for 12 individuals. FMCSA
claims the Agency has misinterpreted (September 23, 1999), 64 FR 66962
has statutory authority to exempt
statutory language on the granting of (November 30, 1999), 64 FR 69586
individuals from the vision requirement
exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and (December 13, 1999), 65 FR 159 (January
if the exemptions granted will not
31315); and finally (4) suggests that a 3, 2000), 65 FR 57230 (September 21,
compromise safety. The Agency has
1999 Supreme Court decision affects the 2000), and 66 FR 13825 (March 7, 2001).
reviewed the comments submitted in
legal validity of vision exemptions. We will not address these points again
The issues raised by Advocates were response to the previous announcement
and concluded that granting these here, but refer interested parties to those
addressed at length in 64 FR 51568 earlier discussions.
(September 23, 1999), 64 FR 66962 exemptions will provide a level of safety
(November 30, 1999), 64 FR 69586 that will be equivalent to, or greater Conclusion
(December 13, 1999), 65 FR 159 (January than, the level of safety maintained
The Agency has not received any
3, 2000), 65 FR 57230 (September 21, without the exemptions for these
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
2000), and 66 FR 13825 (March 7, 2001). commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
that indicates that safety is being
We will not address these points again drivers.
compromised. Based upon its
here, but refer interested parties to those FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. evaluation of the 12 renewal
earlier discussions. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical applications, FMCSA renews the
Programs, (202) 366–4001, Federal vision exemptions for,
Conclusion fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Woodrow E. Bohley, Kenneth E. Bross,
The Agency has not received any Department of Transportation, 1200 Russell W. Foster, Kevin Jacoby,
adverse evidence on any of these drivers New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64– Richard L. Loeffelholz, Herman C.
that indicates that safety is being 224, Washington, DC 20590–0001. Mash, Frank T. Miller, Martin Postma,
compromised. Based upon its Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 Robert G. Rascicot, Stephen G. Sniffin,
evaluation of the 10 renewal p.m., Monday through Friday, except Jon H. Wurtele, and Walter M. Yohn, Jr.
applications, FMCSA renews the Federal holidays. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
Federal vision exemptions for, Ronald SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and 31315, each renewal exemption will
G. Austin, Rickey C. Dalton, Martiniano be valid for 2 years unless revoked
L. Espinosa, Derek T. Ford, Paul C. Electronic Access
earlier by FMCSA.
Gruenberg, Jr., James G. LaBair, Dennis You may see all the comments online The exemption will be revoked if: (1)
A. Leschke, Lonnie Lomax, Jr., Eugene through the Federal Document The person fails to comply with the
C. Murphy, and Carl W. Skinner, Jr. Management System (FDMS) at http:// terms and conditions of the exemption;
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) www.regulations.gov. (2) the exemption has resulted in a
and 31315, each renewal exemption will lower level of safety than was
be valid for 2 years unless revoked Background
maintained before it was granted; or (3)
earlier by FMCSA. Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, continuation of the exemption would
The exemption will be revoked if: (1) FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2- not be consistent with the goals and
The person fails to comply with the year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
terms and conditions of the exemption; would likely achieve a level of safety
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

(2) the exemption has resulted in a that is equivalent to, or greater than, the Issued on: February 11, 2008.
lower level of safety than was level that would be achieved absent Larry W. Minor,
maintained before it was granted; or (3) such exemption.’’ The statutes also Associate Administrator for Policy and
continuation of the exemption would allow the Agency to renew exemptions Program Development.
not be consistent with the goals and at the end of the 2-year period. The [FR Doc. E8–2984 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am]
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. Notice was published on December 19, BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Feb 15, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM 19FEN1

You might also like