Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater obtaining an exemption from the vision evidence submitted and, if safety is
than, the level that would be achieved requirements (70 FR 71884; 71 FR 4632; being compromised or if continuation of
absent such exemption.’’ The 71 FR 4194; 71 FR 13450). Each of these the exemption would not be consistent
procedures for requesting an exemption 8 applicants has requested renewal of with the goals and objectives of 49
(including renewals) are set out in 49 the exemption and has submitted U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will
CFR part 381. evidence showing that the vision in the take immediate steps to revoke the
better eye continues to meet the exemption of a driver.
Exemption Decision standard specified at 49 CFR Issued on: February 11, 2008.
This notice addresses 8 individuals 391.41(b)(10) and that the vision
Larry W. Minor,
who have requested a renewal of their impairment is stable. In addition, a
exemption in accordance with FMCSA review of each record of safety while Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
procedures. FMCSA has evaluated these driving with the respective vision
8 applications for renewal on their deficiencies over the past two years [FR Doc. E8–2982 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am]
merits and decided to extend each indicates each applicant continues to BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
than two years from its approval date possessing information that would Management System (FDMS) at http://
and may be renewed upon application otherwise show that any, or all of these www.regulations.gov.
for additional two year periods. In drivers, are not currently achieving the
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and statutory level of safety should Background
31315, each of the 8 applicants has immediately notify FMCSA. The Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
satisfied the entry conditions for Agency will evaluate any adverse FMCSA may grant an exemption for a
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Feb 15, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM 19FEN1
9160 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
2-year period if it finds ‘‘such Issued on: February 11, 2008. 2007. The comment period ended on
exemption would likely achieve a level Larry W. Minor, January 18, 2008.
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater Associate Administrator for Policy and
Discussion of Comments
than, the level that would be achieved Program Development.
absent such exemption.’’ The statutes [FR Doc. E8–2983 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am] FMCSA received one comment in this
also allow the Agency to renew BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P proceeding. The comment is considered
exemptions at the end of the 2-year and discussed below.
period. The Notice was published on Advocates for Highway and Auto
December 19, 2007. The comment DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Safety (Advocates) expressed opposition
period ended on January 18, 2008. to FMCSA’s policy to grant exemptions
Federal Motor Carrier Safety from the FMCSR, including the driver
Discussion of Comments Administration qualification standards. Specifically,
FMCSA received one comment in this Advocates: (1) Objects to the manner in
[Docket Nos FMCSA–99–5748, FMCSA–99–
proceeding. The comment is considered 6156, FMCSA–01–10578, FMCSA–05–22194] which FMCSA presents driver
and discussed below. information to the public and makes
Advocates for Highway and Auto Qualification of Drivers; Exemption safety determinations; (2) objects to the
Safety (Advocates) expressed opposition Renewals; Vision Agency’s reliance on conclusions drawn
to FMCSA’s policy to grant exemptions from the vision waiver program; (3)
from the FMCSR, including the driver AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety claims the Agency has misinterpreted
qualification standards. Specifically, Administration (FMCSA), DOT. statutory language on the granting of
Advocates: (1) Objects to the manner in ACTION: Notice of final disposition. exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
which FMCSA presents driver 31315); and finally (4) suggests that a
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
information to the public and makes 1999 Supreme Court decision affects the
announced its decision to renew the
safety determinations; (2) objects to the legal validity of vision exemptions.
exemptions from the vision requirement
Agency’s reliance on conclusions drawn The issues raised by Advocates were
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
from the vision waiver program; (3) addressed at length in 64 FR 51568
Regulations for 12 individuals. FMCSA
claims the Agency has misinterpreted (September 23, 1999), 64 FR 66962
has statutory authority to exempt
statutory language on the granting of (November 30, 1999), 64 FR 69586
individuals from the vision requirement
exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and (December 13, 1999), 65 FR 159 (January
if the exemptions granted will not
31315); and finally (4) suggests that a 3, 2000), 65 FR 57230 (September 21,
compromise safety. The Agency has
1999 Supreme Court decision affects the 2000), and 66 FR 13825 (March 7, 2001).
reviewed the comments submitted in
legal validity of vision exemptions. We will not address these points again
The issues raised by Advocates were response to the previous announcement
and concluded that granting these here, but refer interested parties to those
addressed at length in 64 FR 51568 earlier discussions.
(September 23, 1999), 64 FR 66962 exemptions will provide a level of safety
(November 30, 1999), 64 FR 69586 that will be equivalent to, or greater Conclusion
(December 13, 1999), 65 FR 159 (January than, the level of safety maintained
The Agency has not received any
3, 2000), 65 FR 57230 (September 21, without the exemptions for these
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
2000), and 66 FR 13825 (March 7, 2001). commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
that indicates that safety is being
We will not address these points again drivers.
compromised. Based upon its
here, but refer interested parties to those FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. evaluation of the 12 renewal
earlier discussions. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical applications, FMCSA renews the
Programs, (202) 366–4001, Federal vision exemptions for,
Conclusion fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Woodrow E. Bohley, Kenneth E. Bross,
The Agency has not received any Department of Transportation, 1200 Russell W. Foster, Kevin Jacoby,
adverse evidence on any of these drivers New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64– Richard L. Loeffelholz, Herman C.
that indicates that safety is being 224, Washington, DC 20590–0001. Mash, Frank T. Miller, Martin Postma,
compromised. Based upon its Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 Robert G. Rascicot, Stephen G. Sniffin,
evaluation of the 10 renewal p.m., Monday through Friday, except Jon H. Wurtele, and Walter M. Yohn, Jr.
applications, FMCSA renews the Federal holidays. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
Federal vision exemptions for, Ronald SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and 31315, each renewal exemption will
G. Austin, Rickey C. Dalton, Martiniano be valid for 2 years unless revoked
L. Espinosa, Derek T. Ford, Paul C. Electronic Access
earlier by FMCSA.
Gruenberg, Jr., James G. LaBair, Dennis You may see all the comments online The exemption will be revoked if: (1)
A. Leschke, Lonnie Lomax, Jr., Eugene through the Federal Document The person fails to comply with the
C. Murphy, and Carl W. Skinner, Jr. Management System (FDMS) at http:// terms and conditions of the exemption;
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) www.regulations.gov. (2) the exemption has resulted in a
and 31315, each renewal exemption will lower level of safety than was
be valid for 2 years unless revoked Background
maintained before it was granted; or (3)
earlier by FMCSA. Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, continuation of the exemption would
The exemption will be revoked if: (1) FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2- not be consistent with the goals and
The person fails to comply with the year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
terms and conditions of the exemption; would likely achieve a level of safety
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
(2) the exemption has resulted in a that is equivalent to, or greater than, the Issued on: February 11, 2008.
lower level of safety than was level that would be achieved absent Larry W. Minor,
maintained before it was granted; or (3) such exemption.’’ The statutes also Associate Administrator for Policy and
continuation of the exemption would allow the Agency to renew exemptions Program Development.
not be consistent with the goals and at the end of the 2-year period. The [FR Doc. E8–2984 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am]
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. Notice was published on December 19, BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Feb 15, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM 19FEN1