Professional Documents
Culture Documents
faketext
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Learning by doing
3.1
System requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2
Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.1
Installation procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3
Licensing methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4
First start . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.5
Update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.6
Preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Preparations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.1.1
4.2
19
4.2.2
Release information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.2.3
Friction information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.2.4
Calculation parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.3
4.4
4.4.2
Colorbar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.4.3
4.4.4
4.4.5
4.4.6
About RAMMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Contents
4.5
4.6
4.7
Running a calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.5.1
Release area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.5.2
Input hydrograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.5.3
Calculation Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.5.4
Running a calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.5.5
Project information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.6.2
4.6.3
4.6.4
Stopping mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.6.5
Numerical instabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Creating a dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.7.2
5 Applications
5.1
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
5.2
5.3
5.2.1
5.2.2
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
5.2.3
Summary
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
5.3.2
Field setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
5.3.3
5.3.4
5.3.5
5.4
Activepassive earth-pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
5.5
6 Program overview
6.1
ii
71
87
6.1.2
Horizontal toolbar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
6.1.3
Vertical toolbar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
6.1.4
Main window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
6.1.5
Dump-step slider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
6.1.6
Contents
6.2
6.1.7
6.1.8
Colorbar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
6.1.9
Panel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
6.2.2
105
7.1
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
7.2
Publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
List of Figures
List of Exercises
Index
vii
iii
1 Introduction
In the field of natural hazards there is an increasing demand for process models that help
understand the dynamics of geophysical mass movements from initiation to release. These
movements include snow avalanches, debris flows, hillslope debris flows, landslides, mud flows
and even rockfalls and rock avalanches. Models allow engineers to predict the speed and
runout of these hazardous movements in complex terrain. Such models are especially helpful when proposing mitigation measures where knowledge of the inundated area is of critical
importance. Hazard mapping, the primary application in Switzerland and other mountainous countries, requires models that allow engineers to test different hazard scenarios. While
well-tested empirical methods are available to determine runout distances, velocities and flow
heights, numerical models now provide cell information on flow height and flow velovity and
allow practitioners to predict flow paths in general terrain as well as to model entrainment
processes or the breaking effect of forests. Better mitigation strategies can result.
RAMMS (RApid Mass Movements Simulation) is a state-of-the-art numerical simulation model
to calculate the motion of geophysical mass movements (snow avalanches, debris flows, rockfalls) from initiation to runout in three-dimensional terrain. It was designed to be used in practice by hazard engineers who need solutions to real, everyday problems. It is coupled with a
user-friendly visualization tool that allows users to easily access, display and analyze simulation
results. New constitutive models have been developed and implemented in RAMMS, thanks to
calibration and verification at full scale tests at sites such as Illgraben (debris flow), Veltheim
(hillslope, shallow landslides, mitigation measures), Valle de la Sionne (snow avalanches) and
St. Lonard (rockfall, mitigation measures). These models allow the application of RAMMS
to solve both large, extreme avalanche events as well as smaller mass movements such as
hillslope debris flows and shallow landslides.
RAMMS was developed by the RAMMS program team at the WSL Institute for Snow and
Avalanche Research SLF. This manual describes the features of the RAMMS program - allowing beginners to get started quickly as well as serving as a reference to expert users.
On the RAMMS web page http://ramms.slf.ch you find useful features such as a moderated
discussion forum, frequently asked questions (FAQ) or recent software updates. Please visit
this web page frequently to stay up to date!
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
DISCLAIMER
RAMMS is intended to be used as a tool to support experienced users. The interpretation
of the simulation results has to be done by an expert in debris flow characterization who
is familiar with the local as well as with the topographic and meteorological situation
of the investigation area. In no event shall WSL/SLF be liable for any damage or lost
profits arising, directly or indirectly, from the use of RAMMS. Swiss law applies. Court
of jurisdiction is Davos. If you encounter problems, please contact ramms@slf.ch.
2 Learning by doing
This manual provides an overview of RAMMS. Exercises exemplify different steps in setting
up and running a RAMMS simulation especially in Chapter 4: Working with RAMMS.
However, to get the most from the manual, we suggest reading it through while simultaneously
having the RAMMS program open, learning by doing. We assume RAMMS users to have
a basic level of familiarity with windows-based programs, commands and general computer
terminology. We do not describe the basics of windows management (such as resizing or
minimizing). RAMMS windows, click options and input masks are similar to other windowsbased programs and can be used, closed, reduced or resized in the same way.
3.2 Installation
Please download the RAMMS setup file ramms_dbf_user_setup_64.exe for Windows 7 and
ramms_dbf_user_setup.exe for Windows XP from
http://ramms.slf.ch/ramms/downloads/ramms_dbf_user_setup_64.zip, respectively
http://ramms.slf.ch/ramms/downloads/ramms_dbf_user_setup.zip
Please do the following steps before you begin to install RAMMS:
Click on the path given above or copy the path to any browser. A window pops up and the
automatic download of the file ramms_dbf_user_setup_64.exe or ramms_dbf_user_setup.exe
starts after clicking yes.
You must have Administrator privileges on the target machine. If you do not have such
privileges, the installer cannot modify the system configuration of the machine and the
installation will fail. Note that you do not need Administrator privileges to run RAMMS
afterwards.
Read first, install afterwards! Please read the whole installation process once, before you
begin the installation!
Step 2: Readme
Short introduction to RAMMS. Click Next to continue.
3.2. INSTALLATION
3.2. INSTALLATION
Figure 3.8: IDL Visual Studio Merge Modules - welcome dialog window.
Figure 3.9: IDL Visual Studio Merge Modules - ready to install the program.
10
3.2. INSTALLATION
After having successfully installed RAMMS and the necessary files on your personal computer,
you will notice the RAMMS icon on your desktop (for all users):
Additionally, a new application folder is created in Start Programs (for all users):
RAMMS Run RAMMS
RAMMS Uninstall RAMMS
11
Click on the image. It will disappear and RAMMS will start up. The following dialog window
appears (Fig. 3.15 RAMMS - Licensing):
12
to create your personal license request file. In Fig. 3.16 enter your full
In the next dialog window, choose the destination directory of your personal license request
file and save it to your target machine. Your personal license request file should look similar
to Fig. 3.17.
13
Now, restart RAMMS (as explained before). Again, the pop-up window (Fig. 3.14) and
then the dialog window (Fig. 3.15) appears (RAMMS - Licensing). Copy the license key (in
this example: akck-3ijh-3jtl-2h5h-g340 ) and paste it at license key (see Figure 3.15). Notice
that there might be a prefix DEBRISFLOW. This prefix is part of the license key and has
to be inserted as well! If RAMMS accepts your installation key, you successfully finished the
installation.
3.5 Update
When you start RAMMS it will automatically check for updates on the internet. This could
lead to an error message, if your firewall blocks the executable idlrt.exe (this file starts the
IDL-Virtual Machine you need to run RAMMS). Please unblock this file for your firewall.
You can also disable the AutoWebUpdate-function by unchecking Help Advanced...
AutoWebUpdate. The WebUpdate-function can still be done manually under Help Update...
Web Update or go to Help Update... get manually and download the file to your
local folder.
14
3.6. PREFERENCES
3.6 Preferences
Before starting to work with RAMMS, be sure to set your RAMMS preferences and place
the necessary DEM (Digital Elevation Model) files as well as the MAPS and georeferenced
IMAGERY you wish to use in the appropriate folders defined in the preferences, see Figs. 3.19
and 3.20.
Use Track Preferences to open the RAMMS preferences window or click the button
For resetting the general preferences use Help Advanced... Reset General Preferences.
General tab
Setting
Working directory
Purpose
Set your working directory. VERY IMPORTANT: Do
NOT use BLANKS in the working directory path!
Set the folder where you place your georeferenced dig-
Map directory
Image directory
enced orthophotos (aerial picture, consists of a TIFFfile and a corresponding tfw-file (world-file).
Set the folder where you place the Digital Elevation
DEM directory
Models respectively the Digitial Terrain Models (format: ASCII grid, see 4.2.1 on page 20)
15
Nr of colorbar colors
Background color
Animation delay (s)
16
Purpose
3.6. PREFERENCES
The following exercise "Working directory" shows how to choose a new working directory. All
further settings can be changed in a similar manner. The settings are saved, until they are
changed again manually.
Click
Click into the field Working directory, then the appearing arrow
and Edit...
A window pops up where you can choose your new working directory. Click OK in
both windows.
17
4.1 Preparations
To successfully start a new RAMMS project, a few important preparations are necessary.
Topographic input data (ascii format), project boundary coordinates and georeferenced maps
or remote sensing imagery should be prepared in advance (.tif format and .tfw file, maps and
imagery are not mandatory, but nice to have). Georeferenced datasets have to be in a Cartesian
coordinate system (e.g. Swiss CH1903 LV03), polar coordinate systems (e.g. WGS84 Long
Lat) are not supported. Fore more information about specific national coordinate systems
please contact the national topographic agency in your country.
19
(Fig. 4.2)
(Fig. 4.3)
These data types are also available e.g. from www.swisstopo.ch. Because RAMMS needs the
topographic data as an ESRI ASCII grid, ASCII X,Y,Z data can be converted within RAMMS
into an ESRI ASCII grid. At this stage no other data types are processable. The user must
therefore prepare the topographic data according to this limitation. The header of an ESRI
ASCII grid must contain the information shown in Fig. 4.2
20
The starting conditions of a simulation can be selected depending on the type of debris flow you
want to model. Generally, it is useful to distinguish between unchannelized and channelized
debris flows. Here we use the term unchannelized debris flow for hillslope debris flows or
shallow landslides, channelized debris flows develope in regions where torrents limit the flow
paths and the debris material mainly follows the torrent channel.
For small unchannelized debris flows it is useful to use a release area with a given initial height,
which will be released as a block (block release), while for a channelized debris flow it may
be more appropriate to use an input hydrograph. The later requires knowledge of the amount
of material that might flow past a certain location in the channel. Chapter 5 includes several
examples for both types of starting conditions.
The definition of release areas and release heights (block release) have a strong impact on the
simulation results. The same applies for simulations with a hydrograph, where the results are
sensitive to the discharge hydrograph. Therefore, we recommend to use reference information
such as photography, GPS measurements or field maps to draw release areas and to use
measured or well-estimated inflow data to define discharge hydrographs. This should be done
by people with experience concerning the topographic and historical flow situation of the
investigation area.
More details on how to create release areas are given in section 4.5.1, page 36pp. Details on
how to use an input hydrograph are given in section 4.5.2, page 40pp.
21
The physical model of RAMMS::Debris Flow uses the Voellmy friction law. This model divides
the frictional resistance into two parts: a dry-Coulomb type friction (coefficient ) that scales
with the normal stress and a velocity-squared drag or viscous-turbulent friction (coefficient ).
The frictional resistance S (Pa) is then
S = Hgcos() +
gU 2
,
(4.1)
where is the density, g the gravitational acceleration, the slope angle, H the flow height and
U the flow velocity. The normal stress on the running surface, Hgcos(), can be summarized
in a single parameter N . The Voellmy model accounts for the resistance of the solid phase ( is
sometimes expressed as the tangent of the internal shear angle) and a viscous or turbulent fluid
phase ( was introduced by Voellmy using hydrodynamic arguments). The friction coefficients
are responsible for the behavior of the flow. dominates when the flow is close to stopping,
dominates when the flow is running quickly.
Throughout one simulation the friction coefficients of a calculation domain are constant. However you have the possibility to add up to two polygons within the calculation domain with
different friction parameters (see exercise How to ru a calculation on page 45pp.)
The Voellmy friction model has found wide application in the simulation of mass movements,
especially snow avalanches. For modeling snow avalanches the Voellmy model has been in use
in Switzerland for many years and a set of standard parameters is available.
22
23
A new project is created with the RAMMS Project Wizard shown in the exercise below. The
wizard consists of four steps:
Click
Wizard.
24
Step 1:
Enter a project name.
Add some project details.
The project location suggested is the current working directory. To change the
location click into the location field. A second window appears and you can browse
for a different folder (see figure below)
VERY IMPORTANT: Do NOT use blanks or special characters in the path
names!).
Click Next.
Step 2:
Locate your DEM-file in the folder
set in the RAMMS preferences.
Click into the corresponding fields
to browse for the appropriate files.
The use of FOREST-files is not
supportet in this version.
Click Next.
25
Step 3:
Enter the X- and Y-coordinates of the lower left and upper right corner of your
project area, using the Swiss Coordinate System CH1903 LV03 (or another cartesian
coordinate system), as it is shown below for the Valle de la Sionne area.
Step 4:
Project creation:
The creation process can take a while. Different status bars will pop up and show
the progress of the project creation process.
26
File / Folder
Purpose
doc (folder)
logfiles (folder)
dhm.asc
dhm.sav
_.db2
Input file
_.dom
_dom.shp
_dom.shx
_dom.dbf
_.xyz
27
Figure 4.12: "Active" project with lines and corners for resizing
To move the model without changing size or aspect ratio, move to the model and
. Then click and hold the left mouse button and
To resize the model without changing the aspect ratio, use the mouse wheel to zoom
in our out. Alternatively, you can resize the model by changing the percentage value
in the horizontal toolbar
In addition to this, the white hand right next to the rotation button becomes active
as well. After clicking on this so-called view pan button
, it is also possible
28
the rotation axis, by moving the cursor directly on one of the axis until the cursor
changes from
to
29
Click
and by
In 2D-mode you have all possibilities that you know from 3D-mode. It works for input
files as well as for simulations. For the following functions of RAMMS it is necessary to
switch from 3D to 2D view:
INPUT
30
OUTPUT
4.4.2 Colorbar
As soon as a parameter is shown in the project, the colorbar appears on the right side of the
main window. It can be turned on and off by clicking on
As soon as a parameter is shown in the project, the colorbar appears on the right side of the
main window. It can be turned on and off by clicking on
The colorbar can be moved anywhere in the sreen (and can get lost). Use ProjectGet
Colorbar to find a lost colorbar.
ATTENTION:
Values < x.xxx are not displayed!
The cut off depends on the min and max values
as well as on the number of colors. Make sure
that you have the range of values you want to
display!
in the
vertical toolbar.
Under EditColorbar White Color the text-color of the colorbar can be changed to
white. This can be useful when changing the background color of your project to white
TrackPreferencesDebris flow tabBackground color (see debris flow tab p.16).
31
To check which map and imagery are currently loaded in the project, open the project input
(or output) log (ProjectInput Log File). Next to map image and ortho image you will find
the location and name of the loaded map and imagery, respectively.
Information on the image dimensions (x-Dim and y-Dim, pixel) and size (in MB)
are provided and might be a selection criterion.
Select the map you wish to add and click Load selected map.
b) Map not found:
If the question "No map found, continue search?" appears, you either dont have
an appropriate map, the map-folder directory is set wrong or the map is saved in a
different folder. In the latter case click Yes and choose the correct folder.
Click No to cancel search or click Yes to continue search.
A window pops up to browse for the correct map location and file.
32
The second situation in which the input file is saved automatically, is when a calculation is
started. The saved input file has the same name as the created output file.
Exercise 4.4.g: How to save input files and program settings manually.
a) Input file:
In case you want to save the input file manually before running a calculation, go
on TrackSave. This is helpful, when a release area was loaded but you wish to
close the project before doing the calculation.
If you wish to save a copy of your file under a new name, go on Track Save
Copy As or click
Continue working on the original file, not the just saved one!
b) Program settings:
If you have moved and/or rotated your project for a better view, you can save this
position by going on ExtrasSave Active Position.
You can now get back to this position anytime by choosing ExtrasReload Position.
33
Click OK.
34
35
36
Click
Click into the project where you want to start drawing the outline of the release
polygon.
Continue drawing the release polygon by moving the cursor and clicking the left
mouse button.
To end the release polygon, click the right mouse button. The polygon will be
closed automatically.
Before the release area is created, you have to answer a few questions:
Add more release areas?
You can either answer with Yes and create a second release polygon as explained
above or answer with No and continue with the next step.
Choose a new release filename:
Enter a new name for the release area. The ending *rep.shp is added automatically.
The release area will now be created and opened directly, as well as the colorbar.
37
Once a release area is created or loaded, you have to specify the release height. Switch to 2D
mode, choose InputRelease area...Details/Edit release area or click the button
and
choose the release area polygon by selecting it with the left mouse button. The appearing
window yields information about release area, mean slope angle, mean altitude and estimated
release volume. And, most importantly, the release height can be entered, see exercise below.
Additional release information is found in the panel Debris Flow, tab Volumes (Fig. 4.21)
below.
38
Then click on the release area you want to get information on. A red polygon is
drawn around the selected release area. The following window appears:
To change the release height enter a new value (the resulting release volume is
directly adjusted. Click OK if you want to keep the changes, Cancel otherwise.
39
Field measurement of debris flow properties is beyond the scope of this handbook, however
if debris flow activity in a catchment is frequent, it may be possible to obtain additional
information for calibrating RAMMS by installing a monitoring station. Many debris flows,
when the monitoring data are simplified, have a relatively simple triangular wave-like shape
(Fig. 4.23). Assuming a well-estimated total volume (e.g. field data), maximum debris flow
discharge (Q) and corresponding time (t1), as well as the end time (t2) can be calculated. We
call this a three-point hydrograph calculation.
12
Discharge [m3/s]
10
Q1, t1
Maximum discharge
Four-point
hydrograph
Three-pointhydrograph
Total volume
Q0, t0
Q2, t2
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Time [s]
40
In nature, discharge hydrographs are generally better described by four points (Figs. 4.24
and 4.25). However, a three-point hydrograph results in slightly larger flow heights and flow
velocities after the maximum discharge. If the detailed discharge hydrograph is not known it
is useful to choose a three-point hydrograph. In critical applications we encourage users to
evaluate the sensitivity of the model results to the shape of the input hydrograph, e.g. when
preparing different scenarios as a basis for hazard maps.
12
10
Discharge [m3/s]
Four-point
hydrograph
Illgraben August 2,
2005
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Time [s]
Figure 4.24: Four-point hydrograph for discharge values of an event, August 2, 2005, at Illgraben,
Valais, Switzerland.
12
10
Discharge [m3/s]
Four-point
hydrograph
Three-pointhydrograph
4
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Time [s]
Figure 4.25: Comparison of a three-point with a four-point hydrograph for the given discharge data
with the same total volume.
41
Time, t [s]
Velocity, v [m/s]
Point 0
Point 1
88
2.2
Point 2
1500
The other option is to define total volume Vtot , corresponding maximum discharge Qmax and
time when the maximum discharge occurs tmax . The time of maximum discharge is typically
observed just upslope of the leading edge of the flow, probably on the order of a few seconds
to perhaps a few 10s of seconds after the arrival of a debris flow at any given location. This
allows the calculation of the time at which the total volume passed the hydrograph location
(tend ). Discharge is linearly interpolated between known Q-values.
In both cases, the inflow direction has to be defined, which is described as the angle in counterclockwise direction from the x-coordinate of the topographic data (Fig. 4.26).
42
Draw a calculation domain (see section 4.5.3), such that the area of the input
hydrograph is located inside the domain.
43
To reduce calculation time you can specify a smaller calculation domain to reduce the number
of computational cells. By analyzing a calculation with a coarse grid (large cell size), e.g. with
a cell size of 5 or 10 m, you get an idea where the flow path is situated and you can limit the
calculation domain to the area of interest.
Switch to 2D mode and choose Input Calculation Domain... Draw New Domain or click
. Now you can draw a polygon containing the area of interest analogously to drawing a new
release area (see exercise "Create release area" on page 36). We strongly recommend using
smaller calculation domains especially if you calculate with small cell sizes (e.g. < 5m).
Figure 4.29: Calculation domain in green encloses the area of interest and reduces calculation time in
comparison with the default rectangular domain which is automatically generated.
44
To run a calculation you have to open a created project (section 4.3), load a release area
(section 4.5.1), and a calculation domain. Below you find an example for running a calculation
with constant release height and constant friction parameters and .
The RAMMS::Run Simulation window opens. Before clicking run calculation, you
Project name.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
45
Parameters
Simulation Parameters:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Keep the default value for the earth-pressure coefficient Lambda (1.00).
The parameter Lambda modifies the longitudinal pressure gradients driving the
flow. The default value 1.00 disables the effect of Lambda. The use of Lamda
other than 1.00 is only possible in 1st order numerical solver and will influence the
simulation results. A Lambda other than 1.00 can provide better simulation results
but the values have to be tested carefully. See section 5.4 for more explanations.
Numerical Parameters:
(6)
(7)
Keep the default value for the Null-height H cutoff (0.000100 m).
Unrealistic shallow flow heights of the simulation are eliminated to minimize numerical errors.
46
Mu/Xi
(1)
(2)
(2)
(3)
(7)
47
Stop
The stopping criteria in RAMMS is based on
the momentum. In classical mechanics, momentum p (SI unit kgm/s, or, equivalently,
Ns) is the product of the mass and velocity
of an object (p = mv). For every dumpstep, we sum the momenta of all grid cells,
and compare it with the maximum momentum sum. If this percentage is lower than
a user-defined threshold value (see below),
the program is interrupted and the flow is
regarded as stopped. Threshold values between 1-10% are reasonable, but this is only
a suggestion and must be empirically determined for each test case.
Figure 4.34: Stop criteria.
Warning
RAMMS is intended to be used as a tool to support debris flow experts. In some
cases, especially when the duration of the input hydrograph is long, some users
have reported that the flow front continues to creep forward at a velocity which is
judged to be unreasonably slow for the field situation under investigation. If this
is the case, it may be reasonable to stop the simulation at an earlier time step or
to use a larger value for the momentum cutoff to force the model to stop at a
more realistic location. The RAMMS development team is investigating alternative
objective criteria that will be incorporated into a future release of the model. If
you encounter this problem, please contact ramms@slf.ch
48
49
Once its finished, the simulation as well as the output logfile (see Fig. 4.38) are
opened in RAMMS. If you ran the simulation in backround mode, you have click
on any button to finish the calculation. Afterwards the simulation is opened in
RAMMS.
If mass flows out of the calculation domain, RAMMS shows an alert. (Fig.4.37).
To get reliable results you should enlarge your calculation domain. (See section
4.5.3)
50
(1)
Be sure the
(3)
Input logfile
(see Fig.4.39)
51
The input logfile (included in the output logfile), however, can already be opened once a
project is created and before a simulation is performed.
There are two ways to view your project settings and information. First you can open your
projects input logfile (or output logfile, in output mode), or you can check your projects
region extent and area in the debris flow panel in the region tab.
52
Flow Height
Flow Velocity
Flow Pressure
Flow Momentum
Friction Values (, )
, Velocity
, Pressure
, Momentum)
These results are all visualized by a colorplot in the topography. See exercise "Displaying max
values" on page 55.
Line Profile
Time Plot
Line profile
A line profile is a good alternative to the color plot if the flow height, velocity or pressure should
be known at a specific location. The graph shows the currently active parameter. Every line
profile is saved in the file profile.txt in the project directory. If you want to keep this line
profile, you have to save it, see exercise "How to draw a line profile" on page 56.
53
Time plot
This function provides a time plot at a single point. This is helpful when it is of interest to
know the values and maximum values at a specific location (e.g. at a building, dam, or a tree)
through time. Every point is saved in the file point.txt and a point-info file point_info.txt is
additionally saved in the project directory. If you want to keep this point, you have to save it,
see exercise "How to create a timeplot" on page 58. The point-info file can be visualized with
ExtrasPoint...View Point Info File.
54
Figure 4.41: Results: Maximum values of flow height (left), velocity (middle) and pressure (right).
The flow height can be visualized exaggerated by a factor. Click Help Advanced...
Additional Preferences... Edit to change the factor of the quasi 3D-visualization
of the flow height under the keyword exaggeration.
Figure 4.42: Quasi 3D-Visualization of flow height (left: exaggeration 1; right: exaggeration 5)
55
.
or choose
Define the line profile in the same way you specify a new release area. Finish the
line profile with a right-click on the mouse button.
- red line
- black line
- bottom scale
If you change the active parameter, min or max values or the dump-step in RAMMS,
the plot is directly updated. You can also start the simulation and then watch the
time variations in your line profile plot.
It makes sense to either draw a profile line perpendicular to the flow direction or to
draw the line along the flow path. Basically every imaginable path is possible.
56
flow path.
To save the line profile parameters (distance in m and the active parameter, e.g.
the flow height in m) at the current dump-step, go on ExtrasProfile...Export
Profile Plot Data and enter a file name.
57
.
or choose
A window pops up and you can browse for the line profile you wish to open.
Click
Click into the map at the point where you want to create a time plot.
A window opens, displaying the time plot at the point of interest (active parameter
vs. time).
58
To open an arbitrary time plot that was saved anytime before, click
59
Image
It is possible to export your results as an image in different formats (e.g. .png, .jpg, .gif,
.tif etc.). Choose
with the corresponding extension. An image of the visible part in the viewer will then be saved.
GIF animation
Creating a GIF animation is only possible in output mode. Click
tion stopped and a window opened. Enter a file name and location. The GIF animation folder
as well as the corresponding gif animation file is saved in the simulation folder. In the debris
flow tab in the preferences you can define the interval for the GIF animation (GIF animation
interval [s]). Only time steps, not maximum values can be saved as GIF animations.
60
61
threshold: 0%
Figure 4.48: Stopping behavior of a RAMMS simulation. Small threshold values may lead to unlikely
slow creeping of the material. In the example shown in the figure above the stopping criteria is set
to 0%.
Because block release simulations (the entire debris flow material starts to flow at the same
time) usually show larger values for the total maximum momentum than hydrograph simulations (controlled inflow of debris flow material into the calculation domain), the threshold
values for block release simulations could be set smaller than the threshold values for hydrograph simulations in some situations (see Figs. 4.49 and 4.50 and section 5.2).
Whether or not a flow stops depends on terrain (slope angle in runout), total flow volume
and friction values and should always be evaluated by an expert. In case of doubt on how to
choose threshold values we recommend running a simulation with a 1% threshold and checking
the summary of moving mass for numerical diffusion (Fig. 4.47) and analysing the debris flow
runout (flow height and flow velocity) with time plots (Fig. 4.47 and section 4.6.2).
62
0%
4%
1%
5%
2%
3%
10%
20%
Figure 4.49: Stopping behavior of a hydrograph RAMMS simulation. In this example threshold values
<5% lead to numerical diffusion of the simulation results. A threshold value of 5% seems to be
appropriate in this case.
0%
4%
1%
5%
2%
3%
10%
20%
Figure 4.50: Stopping behavior of a block release RAMMS simulation. In this example threshold values
<2% lead to numerical diffusion of the simulation results. Threshold values of 2-3% seem to be
appropriate in this case.
63
Numerical instabilities can happen because RAMMS employs 2nd-order numerical solution
methods which can lead to problems, especially when topographic changes are large.
Action
is local
64
Figure 4.52: Smoothed terrain (e.g. mean 5x5 filter in Arc GIS).
numerical issue
smooth terrain
65
66
Create a polygon ("release area") where a dam is supposed to be built (Fig. 4.54).
You will be asked to "Open dam file (*.rel)". Select the shapefile you want to use
as the outer edge of the dam.
The question pops up, if you want to "Open 2nd dam shapefile (inner polygon)?"
Click No to continue with the next step.
Click Yes to choose 2nd dam file (*.rel).
Next step is to enter the total elevation height or the total relative height of the
dam in meters. This is the elevation of the dam crest.
If you loaded an outer polygon file, you will be asked to enter the intermediate
height (m) (height of the outer polygon file) as well.
Finally you have to "Enter new DEM name". Your new DEM, containing the "dam"
is created in the folder set as DEM directory (RAMMS preferences
).
supposed to be built.
67
To run a simulation based on the new created DEM, you first have to create a new project.
Do almost exactly the same as if creating a regular project without the dam information. The
only important difference is that you have to choose the correct DEM-file manually during step
2 of the project wizard.
Figure 4.56: Simulation without mitigation mea- Figure 4.57: Simulation with two dams built in
sures.
RAMMS
While RAMMS is able to simulate the effect of a dam lying lateral to the direction of flow
quite well, there might occur numerical problems if a dam lies perpendicular to the direction
of flow (see Fig. 4.58).
Because there is no energy dissipation due to collision with dams implemented in RAMMS,
unrealsitically large flow velocities and flow heights may be simulated in front of a dam.
The numerical solver used in RAMMS incorporates information from neighboring cells. The
effect of dams with only one cell as dam side wall may therefore be difficult to simulate.
68
The interpretation of RAMMS simulations including mitigation measures such as dams (see
Figs. 4.57 and 4.58) has to be done by experts. In addition we recommend to always check
the simulation results with engineering approaches.
69
The deposition height is the flow depth at the end of a simulation when the flow is
considered to have stopped moving (alternatively, earlier dump-steps may be used
if there are reasons to believe the flow should have stopped earlier). So first view
the results at the last time step or a different time step, if desired.
The new DEM, containing the deposition information, is created. To run a simulation based on this DEM create a new project and manually choose the DEM file
during step 2 of the wizard as explained above for the dam.
70
5 Applications
RAMMS::Debris Flow can be initiated using either a block release (e.g. landslide release) or a
hydrograph (flow discharge as a function of time). In some cases it may not be entirely clear
which method is most suitable. In this section we describe some practical differences in model
results which may occur depending on which method is used to start the flow in the model.
This chapter presents several topics relevant for the application of RAMMS::Debris Flow in
practice. Several examples of how to use RAMMS to simulate channelized debris flows (flow
paths of debris flow limited by topography, such as a mountain torrent) using either a block
release or an input hydrograph are summarized. Model calibration and the question how to
calculate model impact pressures are discussed.
5.1 Calibration
The following section is based on simulations run in 2011 with RAMMS::Debris Flow v1.4.
The calibration of the Voellmy friction model is one of the most important steps to get realistic
and useful results. For the calibration procedure a well documented historical event is required.
The historical event should be similar to the problem where calibration is required. Ideally,
information should include flow heights and velocities at different locations in the torrent as
well as the material composition, information concerning different flow paths and the initial
conditions such as the total and the initial volumes. In practice, it is difficult to collect exact
data on flow heights and velocities from field studies. However, field data can provide estimates
of total volume, flow paths, flow heights and material composition and sometimes even flow
velocities.
Here, an example is shown, which was used for the calibration of RAMMS::Debris Flow for the
specific case at Dorfbach, close to Randa (VS, CH). See Deubelbeiss and Graf, 2013 [6].
71
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
Table 5.1: Parameters for calibration for the case study of Dorfbach, Randa (CH).
Field investigations
Cross sectional analysis
Flow paths
Deposition of material
Photographs
Release area
Flow paths
Velocity [m/s]
Location 1
2-3
3-4
Location 2
2-3
1-2
72
5.1. CALIBRATION
Granular flow
Mud flow
(solid-dominated)
(fluid-like)
100-200 )
200-1000 )
If the type of flow (granular or muddy) is not known, we suggest the following inital
values of the Voellmy friction coefficients for the calibration:
Table 5.4: General suggestion for the inital values of the Voellmy friction coefficients used for the
calibration procedure
Initial values of the Voellmy friction coefficients
used for a calibration procedure with unknown flow type
Dry-Coulomb type friction
[]
0.2
Viscous-turbulent friction
[m/s2 ]
200
3. Vary around the initial definition with steps of 0.1 and with steps of 100 m/s2 .
After comparing this initial results with field observations, start with a fine tuning and
incrementally change and around the initally-found best-fit values. To match the
simulation results with the flow heights and velocities from field observations at the given
locations we found the following best-fit Voellmy friction coefficients for Dorfbach:
Table 5.5: Best-fit Voellmy friction coefficients for the case study of Dorfbach, Randa (CH).
Dry-Coulomb type friction
[]
0.225
Viscous-turbulent friction
[m/s2 ]
130
The best-fit Voellmy friction coefficients are now used to perform several simulations (Fig. 5.1).
We performed an additional simulation with a small total volume (5000 m3 ) to better model
the observed flow path. This modification is justified because there are two main locations
where deposition was observed during the event of June, 7, 2011. One location is out of Fig.
5.1 around an elevation of 1730 m and the second location coincides with location number
(3) in the center of the channel. The simulation using a total volume of 10000 and 5000 m3
show the following flow heights and velocities at the two locations 1 and 2:
73
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
Table 5.6: Resulting maximum flow heights and velocities for total volumes of 10000 and 5000 m3
and =0.225 and =130 m/s2 .
Volume: 10000 m3
Location 1
2.7
3.8
Location 2
2.5
2.5
Location 1
2.2
2.6
Location 2
1.1
Volume: 5000 m
Figure 5.1: Simulations with best-fit parameters =0.225 and =130 m/s2 for (a) a volume of 10000
and (b) 5000 m3 and a DEM resolution of 2 m. The dashed line indicates the flow path of the event
from June 7, 2010.
Both simulations with volumes of 10000 and 5000 m3 show locations where the flow leaves
the channel (Fig. 5.1, locations 1-4), while in reality the debris flow should simply follow the
channel. Specifically, these are locations indicated by numbers (1) to (4). A breakout, where
the flow left the channel, was observed only at location (2) on the orographic right side of the
channel.
These differences might be caused for the following reason: For these simulations we use a
resolution of the DEM (2010) of 2 m. Additional simulations using a DEM-resolution of 1 m
and a volume of 5000 m3 could reproduce the flow path at location (1), (3) and (4). At
location (2) the outbreak disappearded in the simulation, although it occured in reality. This
result indicates that a resolution of 2 m cannot reproduce the exact flow paths because not all
vertical curves are visible on a 2 m-DEM and therefore material can break out of the channel.
The missing outbreak at location (2) for the 1 m-DEM can be explained as following: first, it
may indicate that at this location the volume was larger then 5000 m3 and only after location
74
5.1. CALIBRATION
(2) more material was deposited and second, an aspect which will be disccussed in the next
section (5.2), the use of a block release rather then an input hydrograph resulted in slightly
underestimated flow heights and velocities.
To conclude, the simulations using a volume of 10000 m3 indicate a slightly too high volume
estimation for the lower part of the torrent. However, to calibrate the Voellmy friction coefficients it was still possible to match the flow heights and velocities observed in the field. The
small differences in the flow path between the simulation and reality can be explained by the
not ideally resolved terrain.
75
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
With an input hydrograph it is possible to constrain the inflow of the debris material into the
calculation domain at a specific location. This is in contrast to a block release simulation,
where a release area with an inital height is defined for which the entire block of material
is accelerated by gravity given the frictional resistance, e.g. simulating debris flow initiation
as an instantaneous landslide failure. Flow height is a value that can be measured with an
observation station or estimated by geomorphic evidence. Assuming that the profile and the
velocity are known at the measurement location one can calculate the discharge hydrograph
there. Other options are presented in section 4.5.2.
Simulations with large volumes and a block release usually have larger maximal discharge values
(maximum heights) compared to simulations using a hydrograph (Fig. 5.2a). The reason is
that for a block release the release area is definied and the inital release height has to be
adjusted according to the total volume, specified by the user. This block begins moving as
soon as the simulation is started. Hence, extremely large and possibly unrealistic initial heights
can occur (e.g. we use a initial height of 13.2 m for simulations with a total volume of 200000
m3 at Dorfbach) (see studies by Deubelbeiss and Graf, 2013 [6]). In many cases it would be
more reasonable to assume a realistic inital release height and adjust the release area to match
the corresponding total volume. This effect inverts for small volumes: the inflow velocity of
a hydrograph simulation may be larger than what results from a block release simulation at
the location of the input hydrograph (Fig. 5.2b). The inverse effect is also visible in the flow
paths (Fig. 5.3). The larger flow heights and resulting velocities of a block release simulation
are represented by the larger extent compared to a hydrograph simulation.
76
Figure 5.2: Comparision of discharge curves of a simulation with a block release and a hydrograph for
(a) a volume of 200000 m3 and (b) a volume of 2250 m3 . For all simulations =0.225 and =130
m/s2 . The discharge curves are measured at the location shown in Fig. 5.3.
Figure 5.3: Comparison of the inundated areas of a simulation with a block release and a hydrograph
(a) for a volume of 200000 m3 and (b) a volume of 2250 m3 . For all simulations =0.225 and
=130 m/s2 . Blue: hydrograph, red: block release. The red points indicate the location of the
measured discharge curves (Fig. 5.2).
5.2.2 Discussion
Two general problems appear when comparing the input hydrograph and block release: the
friction parameters for a large design event may be different than those for the calibration
event, and differences in peak discharge. Large debris flows are often expected to have disproportionally longer runout in comparison with smaller flows (e.g. less friction, e.g. smaller
values). However it is difficult to generalize about how much the friction parameters should be
changed as a function of event volume. The situation is further complicated by the observation
that very large debris flows tend to take place as a series of surges rather than one large surge,
and the effective flow topography may change due to deposition (or erosion) during the surge
(see section 4.7.2). The problem with the unusually large flow depths and the input hydrograph was described earlier in this section. Another aspect of that problem is that sediment
entrainment often takes place along the flow path, a process which is not yet implemented in
77
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
RAMMS::Debris Flow (in development and testing as of this writing in 2013). Because the
mass has to be added to the model to achieve realistic results further down the slope, it is
convenient to approximate the volume increase simply by making the initial release area larger
than is reasonable in the field or by making the volume of the input hydrograph proportionally
larger. This is clearly a simplification, and we encourage users to review the results cautiously.
5.2.3 Summary
Using an input hydrograph rather than a block release certainly enhance the simulation results
if data are available. In this case we can assume that the input parameters are well known
and represent the measured field data (at least at the measurement location). This way large
initial release heights and the resulting large momenta can be avoided.
Channelized debris flows, which typically follow a torrent to the runout zone are more accurately
simulated by input hydrographs. Additionally, the length of the flow path to be simulated can
be reduced resulting in shorter simulation times. (Be sure the entire hydrograph lies within the
calculation domain.) For hillslope debris flows, which typically occur in open, unchannelized
topographies, a block release achieves better results.
78
5.3.1 Introduction
The Illgraben in the canton Valais, Switzerland, is one of the most active torrents in the
Alps, with several debris flow events per year. The village Susten located on the Illgraben
fan is endangered by large debris flow events. Within the hazard mitigation project at the
Illgraben, intensity maps for different event scenarios had to be developed and therefore the
existing hazard map was re-analyzed and verified considering additional debris flow event data.
In a next step, various protection measures were studied. RAMMS::Debris Flow was used in
combination with traditional estimates to analyze flow paths, flow behavior and the influence
of protection measures. Here, we focus on the calibration of the model.
79
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
Volume 50000 m3
Volume 100000 m3
4-6
6-8
1.5-2
2.5-3
75-125
100-200
Calibration started with the debris flow event having a total volume of 50000 m3 and friction
parameters were first set at =0.1 (corresponding to the slope in the channel in the runout
zone) and =200 m/s2 (according to the typical mixture of observed debris flows). Several
similar debris flows were observed during the last years and flow behavior is therefore well
documented. With the initial friction parameter combination, flow velocity was too low (23 m/s on the fan). Finally, flow properties and behavior were reproduced the best with the
parameter combination =0.07 and =400 m/s2 . Setting =0.07 corresponds approximately
to the average slope of the fan. Maximum front velocity and flow depth at the apex and on
the lower third of the fan (at check dam (CD) 27) obtained with this parameter combination
are summarized in Table 5.8.
In a next step, the event with 100000 m3 was modeled and the same friction parameters as
for the smaller event (0.07/400) were used first. Flow velocity was too low and finally, friction
parameters were set at =0.07 and =500 m/s2 . Because of the long travel distance from
the apex to the lower third of the fan and outbreak with loss of material, flow velocities are
similar at the lower line profile for both calibration volumes (Table 5.8). Larger values for
resulted in even lager (unrealistic) velocities at the apex but with a moderate influence on the
velocities on the lower part of the fan.
80
Table 5.8: Resulting maximum flow heights and velocities for total volumes of 50000 m3 with =0.07
and =400 m/s2 and for 100000 m3 with =0.07 and =500 m/s2 .
Volume: 50000 m3
Fan apex
3.9
5.9
1.9
4.3
Fan apex
6.4
8.7
2.6
5.9
Volume: 100000 m3
81
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
A better grid size resolution was not available for the Illgraben. However, we probably would
not have been able to use higher resolution data due to the even longer simulation runs
and larger file sizes. Resampling the DTM AV to a coarser grid might have helped for first
model runs. However, for final simulations we used the DTM AV to obtain the most accurate
simulation results.
Spill over was observed in curves and complicated the interpretation of the simulation results.
These outbreak locations had to be analyzed carefully to decide if there was a real weak point.
An example for spill over is shown in Fig. 5.5.
Figure 5.5: (a) Simulations with best-fit parameters =0.07 and =400 m/s2 for a volume of
50000 m3 . (b) Profile where spill over was observed (profile location indicated by red line in (a)).
82
Numerical scheme
Second order
H cutoff
0.0001
Stopping criteria
5% momentum treshold
Parameters
Total volume [m3 ]
50000
Release area
1.8
3.58
[]
0.07
0.07
[m/s ]
400
500
[]
100000
83
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
ka = tan2 (45
)
2
(5.1)
kp = tan2 (45 +
)
2
(5.2)
and
where is the internal friction angle. This implies that ka = 1/kp . In RAMMS a friction angle
is not specified; rather the passive earth-pressure coefficient is specified directly and the active
earth-pressure coefficient is defined as the inverse, 1/kp .
The use of activepassive earth-pressure coefficients is a subject of some debate in avalanche
and debris flow science. Activepassive earth-pressure coefficients were first introduced into
snow avalanche science by Salm in 1966 to account for the fact that flowing snow exhibits
both solid and fluid-like behavior. Passive earth-pressure coefficients were used to account for
the internal energy dissipation, especially during obstacle interaction. However, there appears
to be no independent means to experimentally determine the activepassive earth-pressure
coefficients. For soils and snow there are methods to estimate it (see Salm, 1993 [14]).
The use of activepassive earth-pressure coefficients will greatly affect the simulation results.
With larger passive earth-pressure coefficients, the smaller the debris flow heights, therefore
the larger the longitudinal expansion of the debris flow, especially in the runout zone. Larger
runout distances are produced. Because of this effect, different Voellmy parameters, and
, are often required to calibrate the same event, when the kp value changes. Therefore, we
recommend keeping the kp value constant during the event calibration stage of the simulation
process.
Activepassive earth coefficients can cause numerical instabilities. Because values of kp 6= 1,
modify the longitudinal stress distribution, unphysical numerical results are possible, especially
for values much larger than one. Large passive earth-pressures can modify the mass flux,
especially on steep slopes, such that no mass remains in the cell volume. The resulting
negative flow heights trigger numerical problems. Within the flow, activepassive zones can
be located near to each other leading to velocity oscillations. Values of kp >5 are therefore
not recommended.
84
There are several ways to ameliorate the numerical problems. We have found that first order
solutions are more stable with larger kp values. We therefore recommend using first order
solutions when kp > 1. Second order solutions should only be used when kp = 1. The mass
balance of the events should always be carefully controlled as this is the best indication of
numerical problems.
85
CHAPTER 5. APPLICATIONS
(5.3)
By default RAMMS::Debris Flow takes Cd =2.0 (corresponding to long walls), but smaller
values of Cd might be called for. Presently, we recommend:
Cd =0.5 for thin, small obstacles such as cables and wires.
The drag coefficients are small, because the flowing material can easily flow around such
small structures.
Cd =1.0 for larger obstacles such as columns and supports as well as building corners.
Here too, the flows can flow around these small objects without diverting the main
portion of the flow.
Cd =2.0 for dams and walls that strongly divert the flow.
The normal pressure pN acting on walls is
pN = psin2 (),
(5.4)
where is the angle of diversion. The shear stress pS acting on the wall is then pS =pN
where is the coefficient of friction depending on the wall roughness.
We further recommend consulting the guidlines of your country for property protection related
to natural hazards. In Switzerland these guidlines are summarized in Richtlinie Objektschutz
gegen Naturgefahren 1 .
It is not possible for users to change Cd automatically. If you wish to consider different Cd values you have to adjust the resulting impact pressure values manually. Recall that RAMMS
defined the value for Cd =2.0. If you wish, for example, to consider Cd =1.0 you should divide
the resulting impact pressure by two (p/2).
1
Authored by Egli T., Egli Engineering AG, St. Gallen. Licenced by Gebudeversicherung Kanton Zrich,
Baudirektion Kanton Zrich (AWEL) Amt fr Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft and Gebudeversicherungsanstalt
Kanton St. Gallen.
86
6 Program overview
RAMMS is a windows-based program that relies on drop-down menus and dialog boxes to set
the model parameters, run calculations and view results. Toolbar buttons are also available
and provide short-cuts of the menu paths; moving the cursor over a button results in a short
explanation, appearing in a text box below the cursor (tooltip). For functions not available
in the current context, the menus and buttons are deactivated and cannot be used.
87
I Project Wizard
I
Convert
XYZ
ASCII grid
I Run BATCH simula-
tions
Open...
I Input File
tion
Close
Save
Save Copy As
Export...
Backup...
tion
sion
I
Backup
Active
Project
Files/Folders
Preferences
Log files...
rent)
Exit
88
session)
Edit
This menu is used to edit colorbar and dataspace properties.
Input
Menu used to specify the global parameters, the calculation domain, release area, friction
parameters and forest cover. This menu is active only in input mode.
Calculation Domain...
tion Domain
to an arrow.
drawn and saved before.
Release Area...
Areas
Areas
I Details/Edit Release
Areas
you can select release areas to define the release height and to view release area information. This works only in 2D mode.
If your release area shapefile consists of several polygons, you can crop some of them
and create a new release shapefile.
89
Show
This menu enables and disables the different visualizations. A little arrow indicates if the
visualization is enabled or disabled.
Show Lights
Show Grid
Show Map
Show map
Show Image
Show orthophoto/image
Show Colorbar
Show/hide colorbar
Show/hide 0-color
Show Arrow
Show Domain
Run
This menu is active only in input mode.
Run Calculation
90
Results
This menu contains the results functions and is only active in output mode.
Flow Height
Flow Velocity
Shows flow velocity of the debris flow for every time step.
Flow Pressure
Flow Momentum
Max Values...
I Max Velocity
I Max Pressure
tum
cell.
Adds the deposition of an debris flow simulation to a new DEM.
Mu
Xi
91
GIS
This menu contains GIS functions.
Export the active results to an ESRI ASCII grid for later use
in a GIS program.
92
Extras
Add/Change or Remove
Imagery
your project. The images have to be located in your distributions IMAGE folder, see section 3.6 for details. If not, you
can browse for the images.
Point...
Profile...
Reload Position
Google Earth...
93
Project
This menu contains the project input and output logfiles.
plorer)
RAMMS.
Get Colorbar
Help
Manuals...
RAMMS web
Updates
Advanced...
I Color Tables
Additional
Prefer-
I Edit
ences
Only for experts.
ences
preferences.
Choose a different type of color scheme for
colorbar
About RAMMS
License Agreement
RAMMS Changelog
94
95
OUTPUT, 2D | Line Profile: Select the topography, until the LineProfile-Button is active. Click the button and then move the cursor
to the start point of your profile. Click the left mouse button and
move the cursor to the next position of your profile. At the end
position of your profile click the right mouse button. A new window pops up called RAMMS::Debris Flow Line Profile Plot Active
Parameter. This line profile plot is linked to your simulation. If you
change the parameter or if you change the max-value in the debris
flow panel, the changes are adapted in the line profile plot!
INPUT, 2D | View and Edit Release Areas.
Zoom tools.
Annotation tools: text, line, rectangle, oval, polygon, freehand.
They can be activated and deactivated in the additional preferences.
Preferences Advanced... Edit Annotations
Interpretation of the input DEM: Slope Angle, Curvature and Contour Plots. Remove visualization by clicking the button again.
OUTPUT | Show Maximum values of the simulation results: Max.
Flow Height, Max. Flow Velocity and Max. Pressure.
OUTPUT, 2D | create a time plot for the last point location.
OUTPUT | export the results to ASCII grid.
Open project folder in Windows Explorer.
Add/change maps/orthophotos.
96
).
).
97
Figure 6.2: The active time step (139) is shown in the time step slider.
Figure 6.4: Position information and triangle simulation results in the right status bar.
98
6.1.8 Colorbar
In general, the colorbar appears at the right
edge of the main window (Fig. 6.1) and can
be moved and resized (see exercise "Editing
the colorbar" on page 31).
99
6.1.9 Panel
A debris flow panel is displayed on the right side of the RAMMS GUI (Fig. 6.6), and consists of
four tabs (General, Display, Volumes and Region). This panel changes interactively, depending
on what parameter is displayed in the main window. The current parameter (A,1) and all
visualizations (A,2) are additional information/functions on the debris flow panel. The release
area or the hydrograph location can be acitvated (A,3) and the corresponing location is shown
(A,4.)
100
General tab
The general tab (A) shows some important simulation parameters, such as: nr. of nodes, nr.
of cells, end time (s), dump-step (s), grid resolution (m) and density (kg/m3 ).
Display tab
The display tab (B) shows parameters that are important for the display (colors, transparency)
of results and polygon shapefiles. The min. and max. values as well as the number of colors
influence directly the colorbar and the visualization. The transparency of the simulation results
can be changed on the debris flow panel, tab display. 0% means no transparency, 100% means
total transparency, see figure below (Fig. 6.7). The colorbar is devided into n (nr. of colors)
different colors, where the lowest color is normally not displayed. The bottom line informs the
user of the range of values that are not displayed in the current visualization (only in output
mode).
Figure 6.7: No transparency (left) and 40% transparency (right) of simulation result.
Volume tab
The volume tab (C) gives the user information about the release area, such as projected release
area, 3D release area, estimated release volume (input mode), release mass (input) and calculated release volume (output). If the simulation resolution corresponds to the input resolution,
the estimated volume is very accurate. For different simulation resolutions, the estimation is
less precise.
Region tab
The region tab (D) gives information about min and max X-, Y-coordinates and the altitude
limits as well as an information about the region area in km2 .
101
<installation_directory>
bin
bmp
defaults
IDL82
language
license
Manual
Temp
<installation_directory>
ramms.exe
ramms.ico
ramms.ini
ramms.sav
ramms_init.sav
uninstall.exe
uninstall.ini
102
PROJECTS
DEM
MAPS
ORTHOPHOTO
It is important, that the DEM files, as well as your georeferenced maps and imagery, are located
in the appropriate folders. These folders are the ones selected in the RAMMS preferences (how
to set the correct folders see section 3.6).
IMPORTANT: There should be no blanks or special characters in all the above directories. For example, do not specify a working directory like C:\Documents and Settings\Eigene
Dateien\Data etc...this will not work for RAMMS.
103
Literature
[1] Ayotte, D. and Hungr, O., 2000: Calibration of a runout prediction model for debris
flow and avalanches. In: Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and
Assessment, edited by Wieczorek and Naeser, Rotterdam, 505-514.
[2] Badoux, A.; Graf, C.; Rhyner, J.; Kuntner, R. and McArdell, B.W., 2009: A debris-flow
alarm system for the Alpine Illgraben catchment: design and performance. In: Natural
Hazards, 49(3), 517-539.
[3] Berger, C., 2010: Debris flow entrainment and sediment transfer processes at the Illgraben
catchment, Switzerland. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bern, Inst. of Geological Sciences,
Bern, Switzerland.
[4] Bovis, M.J. and Jakob, M., 1999: The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris
flow activity. In: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24, 1039-1054.
[5] DAgostino, V. and Cesca, M., 2008: Ricostruzione di alcuni dei principali eventi torrentizi
avvenuti in Provincia di Trento. Technical report, Trento Autonomous Province.
[6] Deubelbeiss, Y. and Graf, C., 2013: Two different starting conditions in numerical debris
flow models - Case study at Dorfbach, Randa (Valais, Switzerland). In: Graf, C. (Red.)
2013: Mattertal - ein Tal in Bewegung. Publikation zur Jahrestagung der Schweizerischen
Geomorphologischen Gesellschaft 29. Juni - 1. Juli 2011, St. Niklaus. Birmensdorf, Eidg.
Forschungsanstalt WSL, 125-138.
[7] Hrlimann, M.; Rickenmann, D. and Graf, C., 2003: Field and monitoring data of debrisflow events in the Swiss Alps. In: Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(1), 161-175.
105
LITERATURE
[8] Johannesson et al., 2009: The design of avalanche protection dams. Recent practical and
theoretical developments. European Commission. Directorate General for Research, 2009.
[9] Mizuyama, T.; Kobashi, S. and Ou, G. 1992: Prediction of debris-flow peak discharge.
Proceedings of the international Symposium Interpraevent, Bern, Switzerland, 4, 99-108.
[10] Rickenmann, D., 1995: Beurteilung von Murgngen. In: Schweiz. Ingenieur und Architekt
113(48), 1104-1108.
[11] Rickenmann, D., 1999: Empirical relationships for debris flows. In: Natural Hazards, 19,
47-77.
[12] Rudolf-Miklau, F. and Sauermoser, S., 2011: Handbuch Technischer Lawinenschutz. Ernst
& Sohn GmbH&Co.
[13] Salm, B.; Burkard, A. and Gubler, H., 1990: Berechnung von Fliesslawinen: eine Anleitung fr Praktiker mit Beispielen. Mitteilung 47, Eidg. Institut fr Schnee- und Lawinenforschung SLF.
[14] Salm, B., 1993: Flow, flow transition and runout distances of flowing avalanches. In:
Annals of Glaciology 18, 221-226.
[15] Varnes, D.J., 1978: Slope movement types and processes. In: Land-slides Analysis and
Control, edited by Schuster, R.L. and Krizec,R.J., Spec. Per. Natl. Res. Counc. Transp.
Res. Board, 176, Natl. Acad. of Sci., Washington D.C., 11-33.
106
7.2. PUBLICATIONS
7.2 Publications
The development of RAMMS is based on scientific findings published in international scientific
journals. A list of the most important scientific publications about RAMMS and its applications
is given below (chronological order):
Bartelt, P.; Bhler, Y.; Buser, O.; Christen, M. and Meier, L. 2012: Modeling massdependent flow regime transitions to predict the stopping and depositional behavior of
snow avalanches, J. Geophys. Res., 117, F01015, doi:10.1029/2010JF001957
Christen, M.; Bhler, Y.; Bartelt, P.; Leine, R.; Glover, J.; Schweizer, A.; Graf, C.;
McArdell, B.W.; Gerber, W.; Deubelbeiss, Y.; Feistl, T. and Volkwein, A., 2012: Integral hazard management using a unified software environment: numerical simulation
tool "RAMMS" for gravitational natural hazards. In: Koboltschnig, G.; Hbl, J.; Braun,
J. (eds.) 12th Congress INTERPRAEVENT, 23-26 April 2012 Grenoble - France. Proceedings. Vol. 1. Klagenfurt, International Research Society INTERPRAEVENT, 77-86.
Christen, M.; Gerber, W.; Graf, Ch.; Bhler Y.; Bartelt, P.; Glover, J.; McArdell, B.;
Feistl, T. and Steinkogler, W., 2012: Numerische Simulation von gravitativen Naturgefahren mit "RAMMS" (Rapid Mass Movements). Zeitschrift fr Wildbach-, Lawinen-,
Erosions- und Steinschlagschutz, 169, 282-293.
Bhler, Y.; Christen, M.; Kowalski, J. and Bartelt, P., 2011: Sensitivity of snow avalanche
simulations to digital elevation model quality and resolution. Annals of Glaciology,
52(58), 7280.
Christen, M.; Kowalski, J. and Bartelt, P., 2010: RAMMS: Numerical simulation of dense
snow avalanches in three-dimensional terrain, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 63,
1 - 14.
Christen, M.; Bartelt, P. and Kowalski, J., 2010: Back calculation of the In den Arelen
avalanche with RAMMS: Interpretation of model results. Annals of Glaciology, 51(54),
161-168.
Sartoris, G. and Bartelt, P., 2000: Upwinded finite difference schemes for dense snow
avalanche modelling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 32, 799821.
Bartelt, P.; Salm, B. and Gruber, U., 1999: Calculating dense-snow avalanche runout
using a Voellmy-fluid model with active/passive longitudinal straining. Journal of Glaciology, 45(150), 242-254.
107
List of Figures
3.1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
The same project extent (area of interest) can be used to calculate different
scenarios with different input parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
List of Figures
4.8
Project coordinates: Lower left and upper right corner of project area.
4.9
. . . . 26
. . . . . 26
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
ii
List of Figures
4.41 Results: Maximum values of flow height (left), velocity (middle) and pressure
(right). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
4.42 Quasi 3D-Visualization of flow height (left: exaggeration 1; right: exaggeration
5)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Simulations with best-fit parameters =0.225 and =130 m/s2 for (a) a volume
of 10000 and (b) 5000 m3 and a DEM resolution of 2 m. The dashed line
indicates the flow path of the event from June 7, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
5.2
iii
List of Figures
5.3
5.4
The release area (27900 m2 ) (red area) was located in the lower reach of
the active debris flow catchment and the digital terrain model DTM AV by
swisstopo with 2 m grid size was used for the simulations. Density of the debris
flow mixture was set at 2000 kg/m3 (typical value for the Illgraben). The
location of the line profiles at the apex of the fan and the lower third of the
fan (check dam 27) are indicated with red lines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.5
(a) Simulations with best-fit parameters =0.07 and =400 m/s2 for a volume of 50000 m3 . (b) Profile where spill over was observed (profile location
indicated by red line in (a)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
iv
5.6
5.7
6.1
6.2
The active time step (139) is shown in the time step slider. . . . . . . . . . . . 98
6.3
6.4
Position information and triangle simulation results in the right status bar. . . . 98
6.5
Colorbar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
6.6
6.7
List of Exercises
3.6.a: Working directory
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Index
Edit
Backup
Backup Active Project, 88
Backup RAMMS Version, 88
Block Release, 79
Illgraben, 79
Example, 79
Input Hydrograph, 76
Exit, 88
Calculation Domain, 44
Export
89
Calibration, 71
Colorbar, 99
Edit Colorbar, 31
Dam, 67, 70
Add Dam To DEM, 67, 92
Debris Flow
Block Release, 21
Channelized, 21, 79
Hydrograph, 21, 40
Unchannelized, 21
DEM
Add Dam To DEM, 67, 92
Create New DEM, 67, 70
Set DEM Directory, 15
Disclaimer, 2
File
*.tfw, 32
GIF, 60
World, 32
File Management, 102
Flow Height, 53, 91
Max Flow Height, 53, 91
Flow Momentum, 53, 91
Max Flow Momentum, 53, 91
Flow Pressure, 53, 91
Max Flow Pressure, 53, 91
Flow Velocity, 53, 91
Max Flow Velocity, 53, 91
Earth-Pressure, 84
Active, 84
Lambda, 84
Passive, 84
Forest
Set Forest Directory, 15
Friction Parameter, 22, 91
, 91
vii
List of Exercises
, 91
Calibration, 23, 71
GIF Animation, 60
Graphical User Interface, 87
Colorbar, 87
Main Window, 87
Menu Bar, 88
Edit, 89
Extras, 93
Main Window, 98
GIS/GRASS, 92
Map
Help, 94
Input, 89
Project, 94
Results, 91
Move, 28
Run, 90
Show, 90
Track, 88
Numerical Instabilities, 64
Open
Panel, 87
Status Bar, 87
Open Shapefile, 34
Toolbar Buttons, 87
Hydrograph, 21, 40, 76
Orthophoto
Add/Change Image, 32, 93
Load New Image, 32
Image
Add/Change Image, 32, 93
Load New Image, 32
Set Orthophoto Directory, 15
Impact Pressure, 86
Input
Input File, 93
Model Input Data, 20
Input Hydrograph, 21, 40, 76
Example, 76
Installation, 5
Panel, 100
Debris Flow Panel
Display, 100
General, 100
Region, 100
Transparency, 101
Volumes, 100
Point, 93
Preferences, 15, 17, 88
Set DEM Directory, 15
Set Forest Directory, 15
Licensing Methods, 12
Load
viii
Index
Run Calculation
Pressure, 86
Calculation Domain, 44
Profile, 93
Constant, 45
Project
Scenario, 36
Save
Preparations, 19
Project Information, 51
Project Wizard, 24
Save Manually, 33
Scenarios, 19
Shapefile, 36
Convert Shapefile, 92
Wizard, 24
Publications, 107
Load Shapefile, 34
Open Shapefile, 34
Show
Release Area, 36
Show Curvature, 92
Left, 98
Release Information, 39
Shapefile, 36
View/Edit Release Area, 89
Release Information, 21
Reload Position, 93
Resize, 28
Results, 53
Right, 98
Stop, 61
Summary Of Moving Mass, 61
Structures, 66
Summary Of Moving Mass, 61
System Requirements, 5
Flow Height, 53
Flow Momentum, 53
Toolbar
Flow Pressure, 53
Horizontal, 95
Flow Velocity, 53
Vertical, 97
Transparency, 101
Update, 14
ix
RAMMS