3900 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.
15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
fees under section 201.3(c)(16),
specifying that the basic fee for
recordation of a notice of termination
containing a single title is $95, and the
fee for recordation of a notice of
termination containing more than one
title is an additional $25 per group of 10
titles.
Mailing Address for Notices of
Termination
Finally, because notices of
termination are time–sensitive, a delay
in processing may have serious
consequences. The proposed
amendment would create a special post
office box at the Copyright Office, from
which notices of termination could
more easily be sorted and routed for
recordation. This revision would also
delete the address for the Copyright
Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP). All
CARP proceedings were terminated in
2007 and the reference is no longer
valid. 72 FR 45071 (August 10, 2007).
Conclusion
We hereby seek comment from the
public as to the issues identified herein
associated with certain requirements of
the Copyright Office under Sections
201.1, 201.3, 201.4 and 201.10 of
Chapter 37 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office proposes
to amend part 201 of title 37 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 201–GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Revise § 201.1(b)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 201.1 Communication with the
Copyright Office.
* * * * * any instance to effect termination as a
(b) * * *
(2) Notices of Termination. Notices
of termination submitted for recordation
should be mailed to Copyright Office,
Notices of Termination, P.O. Box 71537,
Washington, DC 20024–1537.
§ 201.3 [Amended]
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
3. Amend § 201.3(c)(16) by removing
the phrase, ‘‘Recordation of document,
including a Notice of Intention to
Enforce (NIE)(single title),’’ and adding
in its place the phrase ‘‘Recordation of
document (single title), e.g. a Notice of
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:07 Jan 22, 2008 Jkt 214001
Termination or a Notice of Intent to
Enforce (NIE)’’.
4. Revise § 201.4(c)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 201.4 Recordation of transfers and
certain other documents.
* * * * * ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
(c) * * *
(3) To be recordable, the document
must be legible and capable of being
imaged or otherwise reproduced in
legible copies by the technology
employed by the Office at the time of
submission.
* * * * * Comment Period
5. Section 201.10(f) is amended as
follows:
a. By adding paragraph (f)(1)(iii);
b. By redesignating paragraph (f)(4)
as (f)(5);
c. By adding paragraph (f)(4);
d. By revising redesignated
paragraph (f)(5) and
e. By adding paragraph (f)(6).
The revisions and additions to
§ 201.10 read as follows:
§ 201.10 Notices of termination of
transfers and licenses.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) The copy submitted for
recordation must be legible per the
requirements of § 201.4(c)(3) of this part.
* * * * * on-line instructions.
(4) Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this section, the Copyright
Office reserves the right to refuse
recordation of a notice of termination if,
in the judgment of the Copyright Office,
such notice of termination is untimely.
If a document is submitted as a notice
of termination after the statutory
deadline has expired, the Office will
offer to record the document as a
‘‘document pertaining to copyright’’
pursuant to § 201.4(c)(3) of this part, but
the Office will not index the document
as a notice of termination. Whether a
document so recorded is sufficient in
matter of law shall be determined by a
court of competent jurisdiction.
(5) The mere fact that a notice of
termination has been recorded does not
mean that it is legally sufficient.
Recordation of a notice of termination
by the Copyright Office is without
prejudice to any party claiming that the
legal and formal requirements for
issuing a valid notice have not been
met.
(6) Notices of termination should be
submitted to the address specified in
§ 201.1(b)(2) of this part.
PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702
Dated: January 14, 2008
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. E8–888 Filed 1–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–S
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R09–OAR–2007–1150; FRL–8518–9]
Disapproval of Plan of Nevada; Clean
Air Mercury Rule; Extension of
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
SUMMARY: EPA is extending the
comment period for action proposed on
December 13, 2007 (72 FR 70812)
concerning disapproval of the Nevada
State Plan to address the requirements
of EPA’s Clean Air Mercury Rule
(CAMR).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by March 13, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2007–1150, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the public comment.
If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM 23JAP1
 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily
Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4114,
wong.lily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 13, 2007, EPA proposed to
disapprove the State Plan submitted by
Nevada on November 15, 2006. The
State Plan is intended to address the
requirements of EPA’s Clean Air
Mercury Rule, promulgated on May 18,
2005, and subsequently revised on June
9, 2006. EPA proposed to determine that
the submitted Nevada State Plan does
not meet certain Clean Air Mercury Rule
requirements.
The proposed action provided a 45-
day public comment period. In response
to a request from Leo M. Drozdoff,
Administrator of the Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection, submitted by
letter on January 3, 2008, EPA is
extending the comment period for an
additional 45 days.
Dated: January 9, 2008.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E8–1117 Filed 1–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. 2007–0048]
RIN 2127–AJ44, RIN 2127–AJ49
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards, Child Restraint Systems;
Anthropomorphic Test Devices (Hybrid
III 10-Year-Old and Hybrid III 6-Year-Old
Child Dummies)
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM).
SUMMARY: This document supplements
NHTSA’s notice of proposed rulemaking
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:07 Jan 22, 2008 Jkt 214001
(NPRM) of August 31, 2005 that
proposed to: (a) Expand the
applicability of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 213, Child
restraint systems, to restraints
recommended for children up to 80
pounds, and (b) require booster seats
and other restraints to meet performance
criteria when tested with a crash test
dummy representative of a 10-year-old
child. In Part 1 of this SNPRM, NHTSA
is proposing a test procedure for
positioning the 10-year-old child
dummy in a child restraint, to reduce
variation due to chin-to-lower neck
contact that was exhibited by the
dummy in sled tests conducted
subsequent to the NPRM. Comments are
also requested in Part 1 on some other
changes or clarifications to the NPRM,
proposed in response to the public
comments. In Part 2 of this SNPRM, we
likewise propose to add a seating
procedure for positioning the Hybrid III
6-year-old dummy in a child restraint
for FMVSS No. 213 compliance testing.
Concerns about the variability in HIC
measurements obtained by that test
dummy have led NHTSA to postpone
mandatory use of the dummy in agency
compliance tests. The seating procedure
will address this variability issue and
facilitate the full use of the dummy as
a compliance instrument.
DATES: You should submit your
comments early enough to ensure that
Docket Management receives them not
later than March 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
(identified by the DOT Docket ID
Number above) by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702
3901
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to http://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical issues, you may call Dr. Roger
Saul, Office of Rulemaking (Telephone:
202–366–1740) (Fax: 202–493–2990).
For legal issues, you may call Ms.
Deirdre Fujita, Office of Chief Counsel
(Telephone: 202–366–2992) (Fax: 202–
366–3820). You may send mail to these
officials at the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
Part 1. 10-Year-Old Child Test Dummy
I. Background
II. Summary of Responses to August 31, 2005
NPRM
III. Agency Follow Up
IV. Proposals or Requests for Comments on
This SNPRM Relating to the HIII–10C
Dummy
a. Dummy Positioning Procedures
b. Continued Use of the Weighted HIII–6-
Year-Old Dummy
c. Head Support Surface
d. Housekeeping Measures
Part 2. Hybrid III 6-Year-Old Child Test
Dummy
I. Background
II. Proposed Amendments Relating to the
HIII–6C Dummy
III. Testing
Submission of Comments
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Part 1. 10-Year-Old Child Test Dummy
I. Background
On August 31, 2005, NHTSA issued
an NPRM proposing: (a) To expand the
applicability of FMVSS No. 213, Child
restraint systems, to restraints
recommended for children up to 80
pounds (lb); and (b) to require booster
seats and other restraints to meet
performance criteria when tested with a
Hybrid III crash test dummy
representative of a 10-year-old child (70
FR 51720; NHTSA Docket No. 21245).
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM 23JAP1