Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organic Geochemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/orggeochem
Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities, University of Engineering and Technology, KSK Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
WA Organic and Isotope Geochemistry Centre, The Institute for Geoscience Research, Department of Chemistry, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
c
Chemistry Department, University of Engineering and Technology, GT Road, Lahore, Pakistan
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 16 January 2011
Received in revised form 21 April 2011
Accepted 5 August 2011
Available online 16 August 2011
a b s t r a c t
Geochemical characterisation of 18 crude oils from the Potwar Basin (Upper Indus), Pakistan is carried
out in this study. Their relative thermal maturities, environment of deposition, source of organic matter
(OM) and the extent of biodegradation based on the hydrocarbon (HC) distributions are investigated. A
detailed oiloil correlation of the area is established. Gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC
MS) analyses and bulk stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of saturated and aromatic
HC fractions reveals three compositional groups of oils. Most of the oils from the basin are typically generated from shallow marine source rocks. However, group A contains terrigenous OM deposited under
highly oxic/uvio-deltaic conditions reected by high pristane/phytane (Pr/Ph), C30 diahopane/C29Ts,
diahopane/hopane and diasterane/sterane ratios and low dibenzothiophene (DBT)/phenanthrene (P)
ratios. The abundance of C19-tricyclic and C24-tetracyclic terpanes are consistent with a predominant terrigenous OM source for group A. Saturated HC biomarker parameters from the rest of the oils show a predominant marine origin, however groups B and C are clearly separated by bulk d13C and dD and the
distributions of the saturated HC fractions supporting variations in source and environment of deposition
of their respective source rocks. Moreover, various saturated HC biomarker ratios such as steranes/
hopanes, diasteranes/steranes, C23-tricyclic/C30 hopane, C28-tricyclic/C30 hopane, total tricyclic terpanes/hopanes and C31(R + S)/C30 hopane show that two different groups are present. These biomarker
ratios show that group B oils are generated from clastic-rich source rocks deposited under more suboxic
depositional environments compared to group C oils. Group C oils show a relatively higher input of algal
mixed with terrigenous OM, supported by the abundance of extended tricyclic terpanes (up to C41+) and
steranes.
Biomarker thermal maturity parameters mostly reached to their equilibrium values indicating that the
source rocks for Potwar Basin oils must have reached the early to peak oil generation window, while aromatic HC parameters suggest up to late oil window thermal maturity. The extent of biodegradation of the
Potwar Basin oils is determined using various saturated HC parameters and variations in bulk properties
such as API gravity. Groups A and C oils are not biodegraded and show mature HC proles, while some of
the oils from group B show minor levels of biodegradation consistent with high Pr/n-C17, Ph/n-C18 and
low API gravities.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The Potwar Basin is the main source of petroleum hydrocarbons
in northern Pakistan. A number of small and medium sized oil and
gas elds have been discovered from both terrigenous and marine
source rocks in the basin. These oil elds are in Precambrian to Tertiary aged reservoir units. The Paleocene Patala Formation type II
and III kerogens have been assumed to be the primary source of
Corresponding author at: Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities,
University of Engineering and Technology, KSK Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tel.: +92 3218850163.
E-mail address: asifchaudhrry@gmail.com (M. Asif).
0146-6380/$ - see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.08.003
Table 1
Geological information, n-alkanes, isoprenoid ratios and bulk isotope data.
Pr/Pha
Pr/n-C17b
Ph/n-C18c
CPId
OEPe
Cambrian
Eocene
Cambrian
Cambrian
Cambrian
Cambrian
Cambrian
Cambrian
Cambrian
Cambrian
Eocene
Eocene
48.0
36.2
33.0
19.3
22.7
26.6
25.0
23.2
25.0
18.4
16.0
16.1
3.2
1.5
2.0
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.0
1.0
0.4
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.1
0.8
1.3
1.3
1.3
0.2
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
Eocene
16.0
1.2
1.1
0.8
1.0
Eocene
40.0
1.5
0.8
0.5
Eocene
45.0
1.4
0.9
Eocene
46.0
1.4
Jurassic
Jurassic
38.4
41.1
1.6
1.6
Depth
(m)
Reservoir
Formation
Age
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11
P12
2680
2187
2063
3640
3645
2773
2694
3063
3318
2687
2179
2103
P13
3612
P14
P15
4096
P16
4174
P17
P18
4485
4450
Khewra
Chorgali
Jutana
Jutana
Jutana
Khewra
Khewra
Khewra/Tobra
Khewra/Tobra
Khewra
Chorgali
Chorgali/
Sakaser
Chorgali/
Sakaser
Chorgali/
Sakaser
Chorgali/
Sakaser
Chorgali/
Sakaser
Datta
Datta
: not determined.
a
Pr/Ph, pristane/phytane.
b
Pr/n-C17, pristane/n-C17 alkanes.
c
Ph/n-C18, phytane/n-C18 alkanes.
d
CPI, carbon preference index.
e
OEP, odd even predominance.
f
d13C () with respect to VPDB reported with in standard deviation of 0.2.
g
dD () with respect of VSMOW with in standard deviation of 3.
h
d13Caver:age (d13Csats+ d13Caros)/2; dDaver: (dDsats + dDaros)/2.
i
DBT/P, dibenzothiophene/phenanthrene.
j
BL, biodegradation level (Wenger et al., 2001).
d13Csatsf
()
d13Caros
()
26.4
23.1
24.5
20.8
dDsats
()
dDaros
()
BLj
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0
0
0
2
2
3
2
1
1
3
3
3
126
132
136
130
132
141
136
134
22.5
22.2
21.7
21.6
129
137
136
132
0.9
22.3
21.0
145
129
21.8
137
0.31
1.0
1.0
23.1
20.5
145
139
23.5
142
0.27
0.7
1.0
1.0
25.0
22.0
148
139
23.6
143
0.26
0.9
0.7
1.0
1.0
25.1
22.1
0.26
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
26.1
26.1
21.5
21.4
0.25
0.16
C
C
0
0
21.0
23.0
132
21.1
125
149
21.7
135
122
128
22.0
129
114
142
Group
22.2
21.9
21.1
21.1
22.4
25.4
21.9
DBT/Pi
22.9
22.6
23.0
22.3
111
130
dDaver
()
0.16
0.17
0.22
0.52
0.45
0.43
0.37
0.39
0.33
0.66
0.84
0.93
117
155
d13Caverh
()
142
23.8
23.7
25.4
126
API
gravity
Sample
name
1227
1228
types are related to the complex geology of the area and/or differences in the source of OM and its environment of deposition.
2. Experimental
2.1. Samples and geological setting
Eighteen crude oils were selected from the Potwar Basin
(Table 1). The oils cover half of the Potwar plateau, which is the
largest HC producing zone in northern Pakistan (Upper Indus Basin). The source of these crude oils has not been fully correlated
with any specic source rocks of the Upper Indus Basin. A few
studies using organic geochemical properties from cuttings, outcrops and core samples of different geological formations were
undertaken and correlated partially with Potwar crude oils (Ahmed
and Alam, 1990, 2007). Both heavy and light oils have been discovered in the basin (API gravity, Table 1). The heavy oils are genetically related to light oils, and bear a close spatial relationship
(Asif et al., 2008). The locations of crude oils used in this study
are shown in Fig. 1 and marked on a stratigraphic chart in corresponding geological formations in Fig. 2.
The geological structure of the Potwar Basin is very complex
due to the result of the Tertiary Himalayan collision between the
Eurasian and Indian plates (Farah et al., 1984). This intense tectonic
activity has signicantly over thrust the Himalayan in the north
and northwest and a series of faulted and unfaulted anticlines
developed as the result of the multiple detachments of deep surfaces from Cambrian. The Potwar Basin contains mostly carbonate
reservoir rocks of Precambrian to Tertiary ages. The basin inll
started with thick Precambrian evaporite deposits overlain by relatively thin Cambrian to Eocene age deposits followed by thick
MiocenePliocene deposits. The Precambrian salt deposits provided an easy detachment of Eocene-to-Cambrian (EC) sequences
as a result of intense tectonic activity during Himalayan Orogeny
during the Pliocene to middle Pleistocene. This EC sequence in
the Potwar Basin affected by compressional forces has generated
a large number of folds and faults in the area (Aamir and Siddiqui,
2006). These folds and faults have formed many small reservoirs
Fig. 1. Map of the Potwar Basin indicating locations of oils used in this study (Wandrey et al., 2004; modied from USGS Bulletin 2208B and references therein).
1229
Fig. 2. Stratigraphy of the Potwar Basin. The reservoir formations corresponding to oil samples used in this study are also shown in the right column (Wandrey et al., 2004;
modied from USGS Bulletin 2208B and references therein).
1230
and thus crude oils discovered in the Potwar Basin have shown to
be derived from a range of geological formations (Fig. 2).
The generalised stratigraphy of the Potwar Basin is shown in
Fig. 2. The oldest producing reservoir is a Precambrian Salt Range
formation. It consists of thick carbonates overlain by evaporites.
Marine shales and massive sandstones have been reported in the
Khewra Formation of the Lower Cambrian Jhelum Group. The Khewra Formation has yielded the P1 and P6P10 oils analysed in the
present study. The overlying Jutana Formation consists primarily of
sandy carbonates and nearshore sandstones and reservoirs that
have led to the P3P5 oils. The Permian Tobra Formation consists
of glacial tillites, siltstone and shales, and samples P8 and P9 are
derived from the Tobra and the Khewra formations. The Jurassic
strata include the Datta and Shinawari formations, which are nearshore consisting of siliciclastics that contain some non-marine
sandstone intervals (Khan et al., 1986). The Datta Formation has
led to the production of the P17 and P18 oils. Shallow marine carbonate strata of the Eocene Chorgali and Sakaser formations form
an important HC producing horizon in the Potwar Basin. Chorgali
and Sakaser formations consist of medium-bedded limestones
and ne crystalline dolomites. Both formations are oil and gas producing reservoirs and the P2 and P11P16 oils are derived from the
Chorgali and Sakesar formations.
2.2. Sample preparation, liquid chromatography and 5A molecular
sieving
The sample preparation and liquid chromatography procedures
used were similar to those described in Asif et al. (2009). Briey,
crude oils were separated using liquid chromatography on silica
gel. Saturated HC fractions were eluted with n-hexane (30 ml), aromatic fractions with a mixture of n-hexane:CH2Cl2 (7:3, 30 ml) and
polars with a mixture of CH2Cl2:CH3OH (1:1, 30 ml). Saturated and
aromatic fractions were used for bulk d13C analyses and a portion
of the saturated HC fraction was subjected to 5A molecular sieving.
Straight chain HCs were separated from branched and cyclic HCs
by treating the saturated fractions with 5A molecular sieve
(Murphy, 1969) using the procedure described elsewhere (Grice
et al., 2008; Maslen et al., 2009).
2.3. GCMS
GCMS was performed using similar conditions as in Asif et al.
(2009). Briey, we used a HewlettPackard (HP) 5973 Mass Selective Detector (MSD) interfaced to a HP6890 gas chromatograph
equipped with a column (60 m, 0.25 mm ID) with a 0.25 lm 5%
phenyl 95% methyl polysiloxane stationary phase (DB-5MS, J&W
scientic). The injector was operated at 280 C and the He carrier
gas was maintained at a constant ow of 1.1 ml/min. The GC oven
was programmed from 40310 C at 3 C/min with initial and nal
hold times of 1 and 30 min, respectively. The transfer line between
the gas chromatograph and the MSD was held at 310 C. The MS
source and quadrupole temperatures were 230 C and 106 C,
respectively. The saturated and aromatic HCs were identied using
relative retention times, mass spectral data and comparison with
literature data (Trolio et al., 1999; Grice et al., 2001, 2005; Grimalt
et al., 2002; Peters et al., 2005 and references therein).
2.4. Elemental analysis-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (bulk isotope
analysis)
Bulk stable isotope compositions of both the saturated and aromatic HC fractions of Potwar Basin oils were analysed. Bulk stable
isotope analyses were performed on a Micromass IsoPrime isotope
ratio mass spectrometer interfaced to a EuroVector EuroEA3000
elemental analyser. For bulk d13C analyses, each sample was
1231
Relative abundance
C17
Pr
C25
d
c
Ph
b
20
40
60
80
100
120
Retention Times
Fig. 3. Representative total ion chromatogram of saturated hydrocarbon fractions of the crude oils, showing distribution of n-alkanes (n-C1037) and isoprenoids (a: 2,6dimethylundecane; b: 2,6,10-trimethylundecane (nor-farnesane); c: 2,6,10-trimethyldodecane (farnesane); d: 2,6,10-trimethyltridecane; e: 2,6,10,-trimethylpentadecane
(nor-pristane); Pr: pristane and Ph: phytane).
(a)
-20.0
13CAros ()
-21.0
-22.0
-23.0
-24.0
-25.0
-27.0
-26.0
-25.0
-24.0
-23.0
-22.0
13CSats ()
(b)
-100
Daver ()
-110
-120
-130
-140
-150
-26.0
-25.0
-24.0
-23.0
-22.0
-21.0
13Caver ()
Fig. 4. Plots to delineate the three oil groups from the Potwar Basin (a) d13Csats
versus d13Caros and (b) d13Caver versus dDaver from average values of d13C and dD of
saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions.
1232
Table 2
Saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon biomarker thermal maturity parameters.
Sample name
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
Ts/(Ts + Tm)a
0.53
0.40
0.36
0.36
0.37
0.38
0.41
0.40
0.45
0.35
0.31
0.38
0.45
0.73
0.67
0.66
0.70
0.70
ab/(ab + ba),
ab/(ab + ba),
bb/(aa + bb)
C29-Stere
S/(S + R)
C29-sterf
TNR-1h
TNR-2i
Rcbj (%)
MPI-1k
Rcl (%)
C30-Hopc
S/(S + R)
C32-Hopd
DNR-1g
C29-Hopb
0.83
0.93
0.92
0.94
0.93
0.93
0.94
0.93
0.92
0.96
0.94
0.93
0.97
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.81
0.86
0.86
0.87
0.88
0.90
0.87
0.88
0.88
0.89
0.90
0.85
0.92
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.92
0.92
0.62
0.61
0.62
0.60
0.58
0.56
0.57
0.59
0.61
0.57
0.59
0.60
0.60
0.64
0.63
0.63
0.61
0.61
0.59
0.66
0.65
0.64
0.63
0.61
0.63
0.61
0.64
0.59
0.59
0.62
0.63
0.63
0.61
0.61
0.63
0.62
0.41
0.43
0.41
0.44
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.47
0.47
0.48
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.47
0.45
0.43
0.44
0.47
6.8
7.6
7.2
6.3
5.7
6.2
7.8
8.1
8.0
8.4
5.7
6.9
5.5
6.8
7.7
7.1
7.4
8.5
1.04
1.43
1.38
1.61
1.44
1.64
1.50
1.85
1.61
1.96
2.31
2.17
1.39
1.25
1.29
1.23
1.39
1.23
0.94
1.04
1.02
1.03
0.98
1.05
1.00
1.12
1.12
1.14
1.24
1.18
0.95
0.95
0.91
0.96
1.00
0.94
1.02
1.02
0.99
1.03
1.00
0.96
1.08
1.15
1.11
0.97
1.07
1.07
0.95
0.97
1.01
0.98
1.00
0.96
0.75
1.07
1.02
0.80
0.90
0.85
0.92
1.04
0.89
0.91
0.85
0.90
1.26
1.14
1.16
1.14
1.07
1.09
0.85
1.04
1.01
0.88
0.94
0.91
0.95
1.03
0.93
0.94
0.91
0.94
1.16
1.08
1.10
1.08
1.04
1.05
: not determined.
a
Ts/(Ts + Tm), 18a(H)-22,29,30-trisnorneohopane/(18a(H)-22,29,30-trisnorneohopane + 17a(H)-22,29,30-trisnorhopane).
b
ab/(ab + ba) C29 Hop: 17a(H),21b(H)-30-norhopane/(17a(H),21b(H)-30-norhopane + 17b(H),21a(H)-30-norhopane).
c
ab/(ab + ba), C30 Hop: 17a(H),21b(H)-hopane/(17a(H),21b(H)-hopane + 17b(H),21a(H)-hopane).
d
S/(S + R), C32 Hop, 22S/(22S + 22R), 17a(H)-bishomohopane.
e
(bb/aa + bb) C29-Ster: 14b(H),21b(H)/[14a(H),21a(H) + 14b(H),21b(H)] 20R-ethylcholestane.
f
S/(S + R) C29 ster: 20S/(20S + 20R) 14a(H),21a(H)-ethylcholestane.
g
DNR-1: dimethylnaphthalene ratio 1 (2,6- + 2,7-DMN/1,5-DMN), Radke, 1987.
h
TNR-1: trimethylnaphthalene ratio 1 (2,3,6-TMN/1,4,6- + 1,3,5-TMN), Alexander et al., 1985.
i
TNR-2: trimethylnaphthalene ratio 2 (2,3,6- + 1,3,7-TMN)/1,4,6- + 1,3,5- + 1,3,6-TMN).
j
Rcb: 0.40 + 0.6 (TNR-2) Radke et al., 1986.
k
MPI-1: methylphenanthrenes index {1.5 [3-MP + 2-MP]/[P + 1-MP + 9-MP]}, Radke et al., 1982.
l
Rc: calculated vitrinite reectance (0.6 MPI-1 + 0.4), Radke and Welte, 1983.
Table 3
Source OM parameters for Potwar Basin oils.
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
Sample
name
C19/
(C19 + C23)
TTa
C24TeT/
(C24TeT + C23TT)b
C23
TT/C30
Hopc
C24TeT/
C30
Hopd
C28TT/
C30Hope
C29/
C30 ab
hopf
Dia/
hop
C30g
C30
Dia/
C29
Tsh
C31(R + S)/
C30 hopi
Steranes/
hopanesj
Dia/
ster
C27k
Dia/
Ster
C29l
Total
Dia/
Sterm
C27
abb
C28
abb
C29
abb
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
0.88
0.49
0.46
0.40
0.40
0.39
0.38
0.41
0.45
0.33
0.30
0.38
0.44
0.49
0.34
0.33
0.36
0.32
0.77
0.47
0.49
0.56
0.55
0.54
0.52
0.57
0.52
0.61
0.63
0.55
0.55
0.51
0.44
0.45
0.40
0.44
0.07
0.40
0.31
0.32
0.37
0.37
0.46
0.33
0.28
0.24
0.23
0.43
0.38
1.93
1.54
1.16
0.86
0.50
0.24
0.35
0.30
0.42
0.45
0.44
0.49
0.44
0.30
0.38
0.39
0.52
0.47
2.03
1.22
0.93
0.58
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.12
0.10
0.17
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.13
0.11
0.64
0.71
0.55
0.41
0.27
0.65
0.58
0.55
0.74
0.78
0.76
0.75
0.65
0.69
0.79
0.87
0.75
0.75
0.64
0.61
0.51
0.48
0.57
0.38
0.26
0.22
0.15
0.15
0.17
0.22
0.15
0.18
0.11
0.07
0.20
0.19
0.86
0.32
0.29
0.26
0.23
2.23
1.44
1.78
0.83
0.75
0.86
1.13
0.80
0.64
0.72
0.56
1.24
0.83
1.34
1.44
1.59
1.29
0.91
0.77
0.75
0.75
0.94
0.97
0.89
0.90
0.82
0.86
0.88
0.96
0.98
0.83
0.89
0.44
0.44
0.47
0.50
0.29
0.23
0.24
0.23
0.28
0.27
0.34
0.27
0.35
0.23
0.20
0.33
0.35
1.24
1.50
1.45
0.74
0.58
0.53
0.76
0.53
0.55
0.50
0.59
0.50
0.50
0.61
0.44
0.45
0.55
0.55
0.65
0.38
0.40
0.43
0.38
0.97
0.60
0.63
0.57
0.51
0.54
0.60
0.49
0.68
0.40
0.38
0.59
0.58
0.78
0.06
0.19
0.26
0.27
1.15
0.91
0.80
0.76
0.73
0.76
0.76
0.77
0.82
0.65
0.63
0.83
0.74
0.97
0.31
0.40
0.35
0.34
43
37
39
40
41
40
40
48
38
42
42
39
41
45
24
22
31
30
18
13
21
17
16
17
20
8
22
12
12
19
19
18
34
34
32
31
39
50
40
43
43
43
40
45
40
46
47
42
40
37
41
44
37
39
1233
(a)
1B
Equilibrium
0.90
0.85
0
0.0
1.0
B&C
2.0
0.80
3.0
4.0
Pr/Ph
0.75
0.75
3.5
(b)
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
Pr/Ph
2.5
1.2
C
2
1.5
Late
1.1
/(+), C29-Hop
(b)
1A
3
0.95
DBT/P
/(+), C30-Hop
(a) 1.00
Rc (%)
1.0
0.5
0.9
10
20
30
Peak
40
50
API gravity ()
(c)
Early
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
Rcb (%)
Fig. 5. (a) Hopane maturity parameter plot between C29 versus C30 of ab/(ab + ba)
(cf. George et al., 2001) (b) calculated vitrinite reectance diagram from Rcb (TNR-2;
Radke et al., 1986) and Rc (MPI-1; Radke and Welte, 1983) showing different
thermal maturation stages of oil generation window.
Diasterane/steranes, C29
0.8
1.0
0.8
P14
0.6
0.4
C
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Diahopane/hopane, C30
both C29- and C30-moretanes, [ab/(ab + ba)] ratios are in the range
of 0.81 to 1.0 (mostly >0.9, Table 2) typical for oils generated from
mature source rocks (cf. George et al., 2004). The plot of hopane
based maturity parameters between C29- and C30-ab/(ab + ba) is
shown in Fig. 5a (cf. George et al., 2001), where most of the oil samples fall close to equilibrium and higher than equilibrium level
indicating higher thermal maturity except P1, which shows relatively low thermal maturity. The slight difference in ab/(ab + ba)
ratios for the Potwar Basin oils shows the affects of source and
depositional environment variations on these values (Rullktter
and Marzi, 1988; Isaksen and Bohacs, 1995). The Ts/(Ts + Tm) ratio
continuously varies from the immature to postmature (Peters
et al., 2005). The values for Ts/(Ts + Tm) ratio range from 0.31
0.73 for the oils indicating an immature to mature range of thermal
maturity, however a narrow range of this ratio is observed for individual groups. For example, group B show a Ts/(Ts + Tm) ratio in
the range of 0.310.45 while group C shows values in the range
of 0.670.70. The single Group A oil (P1) has an intermediate value
(0.53, Table 2). One oil sample (P14, Table 2) from group B shows a
higher value for Ts/(Ts + Tm), 0.73, indicating signicant effects of
source and depositional environments (Moldowan et al., 1986).
Different Ts/(Ts + Tm) values for each group of oils indicate that
this ratio is controlled by factors other than thermal maturity, most
probably source and depositional environments (Moldowan et al.,
1986) that are shown to affect the source OM of Potwar Basin oils
(see below).
The sterane based thermal maturity parameters such as 20S/
(20S + 20R) ethylcholestane and bb/(aa + bb) ethylcholestane
range tightly at 0.410.48 and 0.590.66 respectively, supporting
Fig. 6. (a) Pr/Ph versus DBT/P indicating lithology and depositional environment
(Hughes et al., 1995) (b) a cross plot of API gravity and Pr/Ph separating the Potwar
Basin oils into three groups, (c) C30 diahopane/hopane versus C29 diasterane/sterane
ratios.
1234
30H
(a) Group-A
Sample: P1
19
24*
30H
29H
Relative intensity
Tm
24*
23
Ts
29Ts
21
19 20
31H
S
32H
R
S
R 33H
34H
S
R S
R
30H
24
21
35H
S R
(c) Group-C
Sample: P15
23
20
(b) Group-B
Sample: P10
29H
24*
19
25
28
29
30 31
32 33
61
71
81
91
34
35 36
38 39
40 41
101
peak oil generation while all other Potwar Basin oils indicate a
maturity of late oil generation window (>0.9) (cf. Radke, 1987).
Methylnaphthalene thermal maturity parameters are also listed
in Table 2. The dimethylnaphthalene ratio (DNR-1, Table 2) >5.5
(Table 2, mostly 78) clearly indicates that the thermal maturity
of the Potwar Basin oils has reached the late oil generation window. The trimethylnaphthalene ratio 1 (TNR-1, Table 2) has been
calibrated with the sterane isomerisation ratio (20S/20R), showing
that the sterane isomerisation ratio of oils reaches equilibrium
when TNR-1 ratio is >1 (Alexander et al., 1985). TNR-1 values for
Potwar Basin oils are >1 (mostly >1.2) for all samples, indicating
that the maturity of source rocks generating these oils reached to
higher than the peak oil generation window (cf. Alexander et al.,
1985). Similarly, the trimethylnaphthalene ratio 2 (TNR-2, Table
2) is another useful aromatic HC thermal maturity parameter
which has been calibrated with mean vitrinite reectance (Ro)
and shows good agreement with increase in thermal maturity
(Radke et al., 1986). The TNR-2 value (0.91.2, Table 2) and calculated vitrinite reectance Rcb values (>0.95, Table 2) from TNR-2
indicate thermal maturity of the oil samples from the Potwar Basin
reached the late oil generation window (Radke et al., 1986). A cross
plot (Fig. 5b) of calculated vitrinite reectance values i.e. Rcb (TNR2) versus Rc (MPI-1) clearly indicates that the thermal maturity of
Potwar Basin oils reaches to the late oil generation window. It has
been shown that the biomarker maturity parameters reveal early
to peak oil generation window for Potwar Basin oils, however these
parameters mostly reached equilibrium values so showed limited
application for maturity assessment. Finally, it is concluded that
equivalent vitrinite reectance calculated from aromatic HC maturity parameters reveal source rocks of Potwar Basin oils reached
maturities of late oil generation window.
A few anomalies are observed in the alkylnaphthalene maturity
parameters. For example, TNR-1 shows a wide range of values from
1.042.31 although most of the values lie between 1 and 2. High
values (TNR-1 >2.0, Table 2) for some of the oils are probably
due to secondary effects such as biodegradation. Affects of biodegradation on alkylnaphthalenes have been shown to affect different
isomers and thus different susceptibilities towards biodegradation
(Asif et al., 2009) and thermal maturity parameters are altered
when using certain isomers in thermal maturity ratio calculations
(van Aarssen et al., 1999; Obermajer et al., 2004).
3.4. Lithology and depositional environments
The crude oils listed in Table 1 were examined for lithology and
depositional environment using aliphatic and aromatic biomarker
parameters. The Pr/Ph ratio shows a range of values from 12 (except sample P1, Pr/Ph = 3.2) for the Potwar Basin oils (Table 1).
DBT/P ratio is a good indicator of lithology and the values for the
ratio are <1 for all samples supporting a shale lithology for the
1235
0.8
A
0.7
tricyclic terpane)
(a)
Terrigenous
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
C28/C27,20R, , steranes
(b)
0.8
0.6
B
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Potwar Basin oils (Hughes et al., 1995). The Pr/Ph and DBT/P data
from Potwar Basin oils are plotted based on the Hughes diagram
(Hughes et al., 1995) and these results are shown in Fig. 6a. The
largest set of oils from the Potwar Basin (group B and C) are shown
to originate from marine shale and lacustrine source rocks (Fig. 6a)
while the single group A oil (P1) indicates a highly oxic uvio-deltaic depositional environment. However no molecular evidence is
observed for a lacustrine depositional environment of source rocks
for Potwar Basin oils. These results indicate that most of the oils in
the Potwar Basin were generated from marine shale source rocks
and the single oil of group A was generated from uvio-deltaic
source rocks.
Depositional environments based on Pr/Ph ratio and HC compositional variations based on API gravity are used to differentiate the
Potwar Basin oils. A cross plot of API gravity and Pr/Ph is shown in
Fig. 6b. The single oil positioned in the right top corner of the plot
indicates higher Pr/Ph and API values consistent with an oxic depositional environment and light oil typically generated from
terrigenous OM. An interesting feature of the plot (Fig. 6b) is the
separation of the group B and C oils that were shown to be similar
in the Hughes diagram (Fig. 6a). The group B oils show lower Pr/Ph
(mostly <1.4) and low API values while group C oils show
intermediate Pr/Ph values (1.41.6) and high API values. The Pr/
Ph ratio and API gravity relationship differentiates Potwar Basin
crude oils into similar three groups. However, sample P14 from
group B is positioned in group C (arrow in Fig. 6b).
The depositional environment and lithology interpretations
indicate three groups of oils are present in the Potwar Basin. This
result is further evaluated and supported using various biomarker
parameters (Fig. 6c). A plot of C30 diahopane/hopane versus C29
diasterane/sterane ratios is shown in Fig. 6c and samples from
the Potwar Basin fall into the same three groups. Group B shows
relatively higher diasterane/sterane ratios compared to the group
C indicating that the group B oils are generated from more clastic
rocks, while group C shows higher C30 diahopane/hopane ratios
indicating that the group C oils were generated from more oxic
depositional environment source rocks. The oil from group A (P1)
shows higher values of diahopane/hopane and diasterane/sterane
ratios (0.38 and 0.97, respectively) separating this oil from all the
other oils (Fig. 6c), and indicating a clay rich, oxic depositional
environment. The P1 oil sample was likely generated from oxic/
clay rich source rocks, which is consistent with its C30 diahopane/C29Ts ratio. The C30 diahopane/C29Ts ratio has been suggested
as a good indicator of oxic/suboxic depositional settings of OM
1236
(Peters et al., 2005) and this ratio for group A is very high (2.23, Table 3) indicating an highly oxic depositional environment.
Although data for both groups B and C oils imply marine source
rocks based on lithology and environments of deposition (see
above), relative abundance of hopanes differentiates the groups
(Fig. 6c): group B is more reduced than group C. The C30 diahopane/C29Ts ratio (61.0 for most of oils) and C31 (R + S) hopane/
C30 hopane ratio (>0.75) for group B oils indicate more dysoxic
depositional settings for OM than for group C oils (cf. Peters and
Moldowan, 1993). An anomalously high value relative to the group
B oils is observed for the P14 sample in the C30 diahopane/hopane
versus C29 diasteranes/sterane diagram (Fig. 6c). The reason for this
anomaly could be related to the depositional environment (high
Pr/Ph ratio for this sample) and source organic facies (Moldowan
et al., 1991; Peters et al., 2005 and references therein).
3.5. Source of OM
The sources of OM were determined from the distributions of
tricyclic, tetracyclic and pentacyclic terpanes and steranes. Fig. 7
shows m/z 191 chromatograms of the representative oil samples
from all delineated groups from the Potwar Basin. The source biomarker parameters are listed in Table 3. The group A oil shows a
signicantly lower relative abundance of tricyclic and tetracyclic
terpanes except for C19 tricyclic terpane and C24 tetracyclic terpane
(Fig. 7), both indicators of terrigenous OM (Philp and Gilbert, 1986;
Grice et al., 2001; Peters et al., 2005; Volk et al., 2005; Nabbefeld
et al., 2010a). The oil correlation diagram of C19/(C19 + C23) tricyclic
C17
C 29
Group-A
Group-A
13 , 17
C25
14 , 17
14 , 17
C 27
C 28
C28
C29
C 27
C10
Steranes
Group-B
Group-B
Diasteranes
Relative intensity
Relative Response
C35
Group-C
UCM
Group-C
81
85
89
20
40
60
80
100
120
1237
(a)
Biodegradation
1.2
P11,P12
Ph/n-C18
0.6
P7
P2
P3
P14,P18
0.4
P6
P10
P8
P13
P15
P16
0.8
P17
0.2
P1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
Pr/n-C17
(b)
60
API gravity ()
50
P1
P15,P16
40
P14,P18
P17
P2
P3
30
P9
P6
1.2
P8
20
P4-5
P11-12
P13
10
Biodegradation
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
Pr/n-C17
Fig. 11. (a) Pr/n-C17 and Ph/n-C18 (b) API value versus Pr/n-C17 showing a decrease in the API gravity of crude oils with increasing biodegradation.
1238
4. Conclusions
Geochemical characterisation and classication of the Potwar
Basin crude oils were performed using biomarker and stable isotope distributions. Saturated HC biomarkers indicate at least early
to peak oil generation window of thermal maturity while aromatic
HC parameters and calculated vitrinite reectance from these
parameters reveal late oil generation window thermal maturity
for Potwar Basin oils. Stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of saturated and aromatic HC fractions delineated three groups in the
Potwar Basin oils. These three groups of crude oils are differentiated based on source OM, depositional environment and lithology.
Group A oil suggests terrigenous source OM generated from
uvio-deltaic source rocks deposited in an oxic depositional
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr. G. Chidlow for assistance with GCMS
and S. Wang for bulk isotope analysis and maintenance. The Higher
Education Commission, Islamabad, Pakistan is thanked for an IRSIP
fellowship and a travel award Grant (IRSIP-5-Ps-20) to MA. KG
acknowledges the ARC for a QEII fellowship (DP0211875,
DP0877167). The authors thank the following exploration companies for providing oil samples: Oil and Gas Development Cooperation Ltd. (OGDCL), Islamabad, Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. (PPL) and
Pakistan Oilelds Ltd. (POL). J. Curiale and H. Huang are acknowledged for constructive reviews of the initial version of this paper.
Associate EditorMaowen Li
References
Aamir, M., Siddiqui, M.M., 2006. Interpretation and visualization of thrust sheets in
a triangle zone in eastern Potwar, Pakistan. The Leading Edge January 2006, pp.
2437.
Ahmed, W., Alam, S., 1990. Organic geochemistry of crude oil from Potwar-Kohat
region. Pakistan Journal of Hydrocarbon Research 2, 115.
Ahmed, W., Alam, S., 2007. Organic geochemistry and source rock characteristics of
Salt Range Formation, Potwar Basin, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Hydrocarbon
Research 17, 3759.
Alexander, R., Kagi, R.I., Rowland, S.J., Sheppard, P.N., Chirila, T.V., 1985. The effects
of thermal maturity on distributions of dimethylnaphthalenes and
trimethylnaphthalenes in some ancient sediments and petroleums.
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 49, 385395.
Andrusevich, V.E., Engel, M.H., Zumberge, J.E., Brothers, L.A., 1998. Secular, episodic
changes in stable carbon isotope compositions of crude oils. Chemical Geology
152, 5972.
Asif, M., Grice, K., Fazeelat, T., Dawson, D., 2008. Oiloil correlation in the Upper
Indus Basin (Pakistan) based on biomarker distributions and compound-specic
d13C and dD. In: 15th Australian Organic Geochemistry Conference, 812th
September, National Wine Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Asif, M., Grice, K., Fazeelat, T., 2009. Assessment of petroleum biodegradation using
stable hydrogen isotopes of individual saturated hydrocarbons and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon distributions in oils from the Upper Indus Basin,
Pakistan. Organic Geochemistry 40, 301311.
Bishop, A.N., Abbott, G.D., 1993. The interrelationship of biological marker maturity
parameters and molecular yields during contact metamorphism. Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta 57, 36613668.
Chung, H.M., Rooney, M.A., Toon, M.B., Claypool, G.E., 1992. Carbon isotope
compositions of marine crude oils. American Association of Petroleum
Geologist Bulletin 76, 10001007.
Collister, J.W., Wavrek, D.A., 1996. d13C compositions of saturated and aromatic
fractions of lacustrine oils and bitumen: evidence for water column
stratication. Organic Geochemistry 24, 913920.
1239
1240
Wenger, L.M., Davis, C.L., Isaksen, G.H., 2001. Multiple controls on petroleum
biodegradation and impact on oil quality. SPE Reservoir Evaluation Engineering
5, 375383.
Winters, J.C., Williams, J.A., 1968. Microbiological alteration of crude oil. I. The
reservoir. Preprints. ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry, Paper PETR 86; E22E31.
Zhang, S., Huang, H., 2005. Geochemistry of Palaeozoic marine petroleum from the
Tarim Basin, NW China: Part 1. Oil family classication. Organic Geochemistry
36, 12041214.