Dajjaal Reduced

Muhammad and James
The Imposter
A Comparative Analysis of the Book of James and Islaamic Theology
The Antichrist
In Islaamic Eschatology and Current Events
VOLUME 1
Mikhah Ben David
Mikhah Ben David

© Copyright 2006. All rights reserved. No portion of this text can be reproduced without written
permission of the author. For more information, contact NewDawnPublications@gmail.com and visit
newdawn.dharmahost.biz to check out other releases.
The Imposter
The Antichrist
In Islaamic Eschatology and Current Events
Voice of America: "If you fight America with all your might, can the Taliban do
that? Won't America beat you and won't your people suffer even more?"
Omar: "On the surface it looks as if that is the case, but I'm very confident that
it won't turn out this way..."
The Imposter: Volume 1
introduction…
It is with some trepidation that I have even decided to release this text.
Originally, this began as a research project into the Antichrist throughout
world religious traditions (beginning in the late 90’s). Over time, what
emerged was a late night discovery that Paul of Tarsus (someone I had
already considered an “antichrist”), in fact bore the physical description
of the Antichrist that Muhammad gave.
This led to a HUGE explosion in my investigation into the
Antichrist. I had met an individual who had suggested to me that Paul
might have been the Antichrist. However, along with Paul he had
claimed that many people who didn’t fit the description were as well.
Additionally, he was unaware of Paul being blind in the right eye and
walking with a limp.
Being a skeptic by nature, I had to have the correlation proven to
me. My investigation into Paul had been on-going since I was a young
child and found his teachings revoltingly inconsistent with the Gospel
message, the teachings of Jesus, the theology of James and so on. This
theological juxtaposition has been dealt with in the text “Muhammad
and James,” available from the same source where you likely obtained
this.
What convinced me of Paul being “the” Antichrist, rather than
“an” Antichrist (something which the Ahlu-l-Bayt said with certainty in
Bihaaru-l-Anwar, as you will read), was the physical match-up; which
was discovered whilst co-researching the subject online with an old
friend on night.
Once I realized this, the next step led me to an exploration of the
apparently longevity of this figure, who the Book of Revelation
associated with the ancient figure “Bilam Ben Be’or.” If this claim was
true, then even 2,000 years ago the figure was quite old. The remarkable
lack of hesitation or appology for directly naming this figure as a
contemporary of the disciples of Christ was thought provoking. Where
this took me cannot have justice done to it in this text. Look for it in a
future exegesis of the Book of Revelation.
Chronicles of the Hunt for the Antichrist
Beyond these points, once I realized that this figure (for whatever
reason), was not subject to a normal human lifespan, I began looking for
similar figures popping up throughout history. The only disqualifying
feature was if the figure did not meet the physical description given by
Muhammad.
This was right after 9.11.2001. Low and behold, who was on the
television mouthing off to Bush that “You can invade us but we will
never give you Bin Ladin?” Yes, it was the same figure that CNN had
told me only in 1999 had a falling out with Bin Ladin… The gears
naturally began to turn.
No, this figure, this “Mullah” who called himself “Àmeeru-l-
Mu’minoon” did not meet all of the final prophetic traits in action of the
Antichrist. However, neither did “Saul” or “Sha’ul Ha’Tarsu,” when he
was masquarading as a Pharisee or “P’rushi.” Strangely, the LATER
“Good Cop” manifestation as Paul fit the description that Muhammad
gave of the FINAL manifestation of the Antichrist in the future.
So it served to reason that maybe, just maybe, this figure acting so
much like Saul of Tarsus in this Phariseesque “Taliban” movement
might emerge later on the scene as someone more in the image of “Paul”
(both in actuality being one and the same). It is, therefore, important to
note, that the New Testament is NOT a chronological compilation. The
Book of Acts was a propaganda piece, written by Paul’s disciple Luke
(who never met Jesus), and came out AFTER Paul went missing around
65 C.E.
Paul DID NOT, at first, admit that he was Saul. It took, what he
called “spying” by James and those under his authority in Jerusalem, to
uncover and publicize this fact. Only then did Paul go from claiming to
be a Greek from Tarsus, to playing up his professed “Jewish” roots in
Jerusalem (notwithstanding the fact that he claimed to be of the tribe of
Benjamin and born and apparently martially trained in Tarsus). Then, he
played up his former wickedness as being the catalyst of a huge
conversion; in which he bragged about his remarkable “change” as a
spiritual transformation (and yet still dodged prosecution for what Luke
would say was his “consent” or “order” being given to kill Stephen… or
2
at least to try). All of this is a story within itself, and to be sure, this
investigation led to the writing of two texts “Paul: Apostle or Apostate”
and “The Worthless Shepherd: Identifying the Antichrist;” both of which
are being worked (along with other material), into a full length published
book by Ilm Publications.
Beyond all of that was a book that I endevor to publish with Ilm
Publications on the so-called “Mullah.” This first volume represents a lot
of the research I have complied to date. However, the story is not
finished being written on the “Mullah Ùmar” persona of this figure. As
such, I have no choice but to continue to chronical news, ideas, theories
and the like involving this individual who I strongly believe is one and
the same as the ancient Beast of Tarsus; the figure which the Book of
Revelation calls “the False Prophet.”
With that gist being dropped in your lap right from the get-go, I
present this text for your consideration and edification. Enjoy.
3
Common Responses To This Claim…

From the time that I first put out the attention-getting flyer “The Hunt
For Mulla Ùmar,” and wrote two texts that later would combine to form
a precursor to this book, I encountered many responses that usually
followed a certain pattern. Some of the most typical are exemplified in
the following excerpts from letters I received.
“Mullah Ùmar the Dajjaal ehehe thats a laff . Dajjaal has many aspect we
know that Mullah Ùmar? Hummm maybe he is a little Dajjaal as the
messenger of ALLAAH told us that there would be many Dajjaals. Mulla
Ùmar could just be one of them? Whatever, ALLAAH knows best! Ibn kahir
explains Dajaal and its aspects, remember Dajjaal is total deception and
Mulla Ùmar is just one of them!”
My response was as follows:
Dear friend, your letter exemplifies the type of responses that i get from
people who DO NOT investigate the matter of the Dajjaal and the identity of
the so-called Mullah. Let’s explore what you said:
“Mullah Ùmar the Dajjaal ehehe thats a laff .”
Why is that a laugh my friend? What makes that notion funny? Can you
please tell me which of the attributes of the Dajjaal this “man” does not
have?
“Dajjaal has many aspect we know that Mullah Ùmar? Hummm maybe he
is a little Dajjaal as the messenger of ALLAAH told us that there would be
many Dajjaals. Mulla Ùmar could just be one of them? Whatever, ALLAAH
knows best!”
What you have done here is begun to say that it is crazy to think that he
could be the Dajjaal because the Dajjaal has this attribute or that attribute...
But then you couldn’t really think of any Dajjaalic attribute the the so-called
“Mullah Ùmar” doesn’t have. So you changed the pace to say that he could
just be one of many Dajjaaloon. Now if you can acknowledge THAT, then
4
why is what i said a “laugh?” You are in fact acknowledging that he very
well could be ONE of the many Dajjaaloon... With that in mind, how do you
KNOW that he is NOT the Dajjaal?
“Ibn kahir explains Dajjaal and its aspects, remember Dajjaal is total
deception and Mulla Ùmar is just one of them!”
It is a common maxim that the greatest trick the Devil played on the world is
making us believe that he doesn’t exist. As well, within the Ummah we see a
theory becoming more and more prominent; that the Dajjaal himself does
not really exist; that it is a system alone, or that it is all figurative.
Nevertheless, this is NOT what the Qur’aan nor Ahadeeth say. Muhammad
said the Dajjaal was a living individual in his day and that he would live for
much longer and would do many things (all things done by a “man” and not
by a system nor allegory).
With that said, i would urge you to INVESTIGATE the matter before you
make an assumption that you are right about it. Additionally, do not scoff at
a notion that you then acknowledge in part only seconds later. Lastly, do not
assume that you are so clever that the Dajjaal could never cause you to doubt
his identity as the Dajjaal.
Another response that I received was:
“The Taliban were a 5 year blink in the context of history. To aggrandize

such a historically forgettable movement is to lack foresight. I’ve read all
these arguments about Mullah Ùmar on angry Shiìte message boards and
the evidences are silly at best and often by people who don’t even know the
source languages of what they are quoting. Also, as someone who is half
Afghan, I can tell you that calling the Taliban ‘more powerful than before
the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan’ is simply Science-Fictional. Before the
U.S. invasion they ruled 80% of the country. Now they rule a few caves in
Spin Boldak an area probably the size of two major league football fields.
“Claiming that Mullah Ùmar is al-Masîh ad-Dajjâl (“The False

Messiah”) would be calling George Bush al-Mahdî. The only difference is
that history will remember the terror of George W. Bush. In 15 years no one
will even remember Mullah Ùmar ever existed.”
5
My response was as follows:
My friend, first and foremost, you have not read the evidence.
Secondly, to suggest that the Taliban is a PAST phenomenon is strangely

naive. The Taliban, by ALL reports - Western and Eastern media alike - is
stronger than ever. That is not Western propaganda; the West does not wish
for it to seem like the Afghani invasion was anything but a total success.
With all due respect, you being half Afghani does not invalidate such
reports, nor does it mean you have an inherient understanding of what
degree of control the Taliban has.
Additionally, to suggest that the world will not remember the Taliban
in 15 years is beyond naive. If i was trying to be offensive, i would say that
this is insane. But honestly, i do not think that you really believe that; i think
you were perhaps trying to emphasize your point by saying something very
extreme that you know is not true. Even if the Taliban were dead (which you
will not find any media - even that of the Taliban itself - reporting such),
then they would still be remembered for their brief oppressive governmental
rule. Moreover, do not get the mistaken - and wrong - impression that i am
suggesting that the Taliban will be the Afghani government again and that
said government will be the vehicle for Dajjaalic power to be exercised.
Again, the book is there to lay out the evidence, the “daleel.” Though i
could post all of this on a message board, i have found that there is no point
to it. The book exists for people who are seeking. If people do not wish to
look deeply into matters then they ignore the book and the people who are
interested in the book (and the topics of the book), ignore them.
Thirdly, as explained in the book, the Taliban is no more the FINAL
movement of the Dajjaal than the infiltration into the P’rushim by Sha’ul
Ha’Tarsu was the same as the creation of Paulian Christianity. They are two
separate events and contexts, orchestrated and directed by the same person
(though that is certainly not to suggest that Sha’ul FOUNDED the P’rushim,
nevertheless he clearly infiltrated it at a high, localized level).
Now with all due respect, this book is not considered both
controversial and ground-breaking (like the precursors to it), for nothing. If
this was information that everyone had pieced together then why would i
write a book on it? Obviously it is being written for the specific reason that
there is not a lot of other texts putting these pieces together.
...but of course, no matter how much evidence one presents there will
still be those who scoff at notions they are not accustomed to. Even in spite
6
of the DaVinci Code’s popularity, there are still so many people who scoff at
there being any historicity to the novel because they “know” that Jesus never
married, had children, etc. Oh well.
Another, more open-minded typical response I received was:
“Scary and interesting. I’ll have to read it. I actually have a book with
Hadeeths, quotes from the Qur’aan Kareem and tafseer about the End of
Days. A great deal of it speaks about Al Dajjaal (the Anti-Christ). There are
actually a lot of complexities to his appearance and I’d have to read it
before making any judgments. I actually thought Bush was a smaller Dajjaal
for a while after I read it. There are suppose to be tens of smaller Dajjaals
before the big one. You’d be surprised how much Bush fits the description.
You could even make a good argument about it. I’ll have to look for my book
and post some quotes. Thanks for the info on this book.”
i’ll be honest with you, when Bush first came into office, i had considered it
(the vote count results had something to do with it too, since that played into
many of the Christian scenarios i was raised speculating about)...
This statement: “There are actually a lot of complexities to his
appearance and I’d have to read it before making any judgments” is an
intelligent one. i do not expect anyone to see the title and cover of my book
and say “AH-HA! i agree!” Reading and investigating with an open-mind is
the only way to acquire REAL knowledge.
OBVIOUSLY if someone was the Dajjaal, it only serves to reason
that they would be clever enough to make it seem as though they were not
(even if they fit the description to the letter). As such, it is important that we
keep and open mind to possibilities that we have not yet investigated. i
appreciate that you have done this.
Another response, perhaps somewhere in between the former ones, was

as follows:
“I think to call this Mullah Dajjaal is too far-fetched. His coming would
have to coincide with other signs of ‘The Hour’. I read a book which deals a
great deal with the issue of Dajjaal. Although I prefer not to accept any of
this wholly, I would be quite convinced that the neo-cons are working for
7
him. You should read that book. But as with everything you must remain
objective.”
Again, i would say that one would have to seriously study the background of
this character before they discount him. Let me ask you, do you know of
anyone else in HISTORY who has survived 31 7.69 x 39 rounds to the body
and walked out of the hospital in less than a week (or even survived for that
matter)? This is just one of many INSANE pieces of factual history of this
“man.”
These were all typical of the letters, and other forms of the response
often on the Internet that I received. As has proven typical of the bane of
the Internet’s existence, most were more dismissive and often
confrontational on the World Wide Web than when I brought this matter
to the attention of the Islaamic Ummah in face to face meetings. Those I
met in person often stood or sat quietly and politely listening to the
evidence. It was obvious from the looks on their faces that from the
outset they did not believe such claims about this so-called Mullah. Even
amongst Sheeyàh who have perhaps the most reason to believe this
about the individual, there was a definite sense of skepticism.
Nevertheless, for those who listened to the evidence against the
individual, within a short conversation they were generally either
completely convinced or at least seriously considering the possibility
that this was in fact the case.
It was this, primarily, that led to the publication of this book. As
noted, the Internet has many disappointing short-comings in
communication, and networking; first and foremost that people do not
act like themselves on it. People think of the words they see on their
home computer monitor as mere pixels, or binary code. They do not
treat their responses as though they were dealing with a real person. This
is exhibited by the myriad of times that any one of us can certainly recall
someone being very mouthy and offensive online and then being docile
and polite in events that led to face to face communication. This happens
to such a common, widespread extent that I’m absolutely certain that
there is no one reading this, who has spent any amount of time
8
corresponding online, who has not experienced something similar in

nature.
Thus, one might wonder why I would put out this information in a
book that people must purchase? Why wouldn’t I just post this
information on a website for all to publicly access? Well the answer is
that I did in fact do just that for several years. This website was met with
extreme opposition from not only the mainstream Ummah, but also from
“Jihaadi Watchdog” groups like “Jihad Watch” (which, I am told,
accused me of running terrorist training camps because I spearheaded an
endeavor to rally people to hunt down the so-called “Mullah” Ùmar).
Additionally, Internet Haganah accused myself and friends who
aided in this endeavor, of being dangerous terrorists; and proudly
boasted publically that they were passing on our personal information,
so that we would be “dealt with” behind the scenes. To this end, it was
Internet Haganah’s Andrew Aaron Weisburd who posted “secret”
correspondences on his blog that told him to stop talking about us
openly and just pass on our private information and addresses to a
groups that Aaron did not identify. It was around this time that my wife
and two children (at that time, I only had two children), were chased at
high speeds in the heartland of JDL terrorism; Orange County, were JDL
terrorists bombed the office of Republican Darrell Issa (who incidentally
led the recall of Gray Davis, which led to Arnold Swartzenneger coming
into office as Governor of California).
Undoubtedly this had less to do with out attack on the so-called
“Mullah” and more to do with our peripherial comments of support for
Muqtada-s-Sadr’s newpaper’s right to free speech (this being the cause
of their violent clashes with Western troops in Iraq), as well as our
support for the rights of Palestinians in their homeland (whilst
simultaneously denouncing all forms of terrorism). In spite of our
declarations that we did not view violence as an option in swaying
politics, nor for use in ANY instance other than immediate self-defense,
this obviously did not sit well with “Jihad Watch’s” Robert Spencer
(who authored the racist and inflammatory “Politically Incorrect Guide
9
to Islaam and the Crusades,” nor with Aaron Weisburd and his
presumably JDL terrorist connections.
All of this culminated in the FBI being fed a lot of inaccurate and
often fabricated information. After finding myself on the FBI’s infamous
“No Fly” list, I figured that it was about time to contact them and sort
the matter out directly. To be fair to them, given the widespread reports
of activity that neither I nor anyone I knew were involved in, they had
real reasons to be investigating and tracking me. I could write a book on
what this entailed alone, but there is certainly no need to. Those events
are more to be relegated to strange stories that I’ll one day tell my
Grandchildren, God Willing.
Finally, the following was a letter of support from an individual
that I had met years ago at a local Halaqah. Like me and several friends
of mine, he and some of his friends had been on their own “hunt” for the
identification of the Dajjaal. His response was as follows:
Hey folks, Isa Adam [referring to an Islaamic pen-name I had been given by
an old friend] is pointing out something highly important, and the
repercussions to what he states are immense and grave. You should pay
attention to him. You should break out Paypal and buy his books as well.
For our ikhwan who have a problem with the idea that Mullah ‘Omar
is not who he seems to be; look, guys, it’s bloody obvious. Its something
some people figured out almost a decade ago when he first appeared. Let us
explore this issue;
A virtual unknown, supposedly half literate, village Mullah becoming
a hero by playing off a few emotive conditioned responses. A few Pashtun
boys are attacked by pederasts, he rescues them, a few girls are raped and
kidnapped, he rescues them, suddenly the ISI allows him (allows, research
the events) to attack some of Hekmatyars arms dumps dumps GIVEN to
Gulbuddin BY the ISI and CIA and poorly guarded. The Taliban display so
much Muslim brotherhood, they slaughter Hekmatyars guys unprovoked,
take these arms caches. Suddenly hordes of half-schooled Pashtun Talibs
show up at the Pak-Afghan border. This force is initially backed by the
Frontier ConstAboolary; next they are backed up by the ISI and CIA. Next
they conquer most of Afghanistan in lightning speed.
10
They play off Sunni-Shia tension in their fights against the Ghulat,
Ismaili Hazaras (we shall get to the Ismailis in due time) They constantly
push every Pukhtun pride red button and become darlings.
Their Mullah leader, he is backed by people who sincerely join him
because (and there are several interviews of Talibs out there to this point,
indeed dig up old issues of Dharb-i Mumin) everyone has a sort of Mahdist
zeal.
He’s called Amir ul-Mumineen, people start to whisper about
aHadeeth regarding black flags from Khorasan a defeated people are rallied
up. A meme cluster is generated. A set of ideas linked on purpose, an Amir
al-Mumineen, an independent Amirate under Sharia law, Pashtun pride and
zeal, anti-Western zeal, the Mahdi prophesies, law, order the cessation of
anarchy, restoration of traditional patriarchal village norms and resentment
against urbane, cosmopolitan modernity, resentment against Najibullaah and
Communist sympathizers, ALL WRAPPED UP with the idea of a
continuous Jihaadic machine. This is powerful stuff people, look at it with
care, how many red hot buttons are pushed.
Yet NO ONE really knows this Mullah, his parentage, his lineage, his
real birth date (several contradictory stories), he had no real qualifications,
and utterly does not obey sunan regarding an Amirs accessibility to the
people. Hes hidden, works in secret behind hajibs who taste his food, Ive
read early stories of him refusing to see major Ulama who traveled to give
him bayat, accepting it by proxy instead.
So what does he have to hide? An Amir, an Imaam, is publicly
accessible. The cockamamie story about not being photographed because
photography is against the Sharia is silly. Most, if not all, of the Taliban big
shots have been repeatedly photographed
Except for one. The few photos of him out there seem to be of three
different individuals, one may may.. be authentic. But who knows.
Mullah Omars not the only person obeying such a pattern of behavior,
I know that brother Isa Adam could name several and perhaps he will in
future books of his (his naming Saul is another good example, indeed many
of the early Ebionites claimed Saul of Tarsus to be a Dajjaal).
As for the Taliban’s dangerousness, they really aren’t. That’s the
magic of the Mullah’s coup. Look at Iraq and look at Afghanistan, the
difference is startling. Iraq, there is real resistance, Afghanistan the US
flattened Taliban resistance; they were systematically LED into positions
and formations in which their resistance could be flattened with ease. Our
governments military accomplished in short order what the Soviets could not
11
in years, crushed a major Afghan force utterly. The few Taliban cells that
emerge and get in firefights now and then are chaff.
Their people may exist and still have a dream of a Sunni, Afghan,
Amirate run by Pashtun Talibs, but they are hardly a force to be reckoned
with. And this is because they were always unwitting tools to accomplish
certain ends, by certain people, and when they outlived their usefulness they
were deactivated. Fin.
P.S. These matters are of such import that I highly encourage every
interested sister and brother to look further. Teach someone to fish and
they’ll fish, give ‘em a fish and they pick bones from their teeth and ask for
more. Isa knows damn well how to fish, the rest of us should learn too for it
is a useful skill.
The Taliban are dodgy. End of story.
The author of this letter, Kamal, is exactly right. There are precursor
texts to this one, that detail and investigate historic personages of the
Antichrist, manifest throughout history and the world. Additionally, as
you will see in this text, Kamal was spot on with his summarization of
the matter.
12
Prophecy and Islaamic Eschatology

There is without a doubt no more enthralling eschatological topic in
religious circles than that of the identity and the rise of the Antichrist.
Whether the Judaic concept of “Armilus,” the Christian “Beast that
came up from the Earth” also known as the “False Prophet,” or the
traditionally Islaamic termed “Maseehu-d-Dajjaal,” the descriptions of
the individual and the foretold events leading up to his rise, and last
battle, are nearly identical. Indeed, it is this cross-cultural correlation of
descriptions and modus operandi of such and individual that makes the
notion of his very existence so compelling and fascination. For where
there is a wanted criminal described throughout various lands and in
various languages, as looking the same, acting the same and rising under
similar circumstances, few would dispute the identification of the
individual as the same.
Perhaps the most daunting task is finding the middle ground
however. Islaam is repeatedly described as the “Religion of Reason” by
the Ahlu-l-Bayt. It is the Middle Way, “moderate” and “Straight Path”
Qur’aanically. It is a path neither of denial of the spiritual nor of the
physical. Over emphasis is placed upon neither one nor the other.
However, over time it seems that two main camps have emerged within
religious circles. To one camp, it seems impossible that there is an
ancient Beast (or “Creature” if you will), running around the world,
spreading mischief; who was bound in “Sheol” during the life and
ministry of Muhammad and the Ahlu-l-Bayt for a 1,000 year “Era of
Peace” foretold in the Book of Revelation. It seems unimaginable that
this individual, described as one-eyed, bowlegged, impotent, could be
thousands of years old, or that he could be so craftily successful in
bringing his aims to fruition on such a massive scale. To this camp, such
notions are viewed as the height of superstition. To one camp there are
no physical creatures know in the Qur’aan as “Jinn.” To them the Jinn
and the “Malaa’ikah” (Angels) are purely spiritual entities, that we do
not cross paths with on the plane of the physical world. They may
influence us from time to time, spiritually speaking. However, they are
13
not viewed as physically substantial. Such a view fits very nicely into
the anthropocentric world view which the modern world has sold us.
Nevertheless, the pages of history speak clearly that this view does not
have very deep roots in human experience and religious belief.
The other camp, generally speaking, views everything Scripturally
expressed, as literal. This being the case on one hand, they then try to
override any traditions or Ayaat that contradict with their overly
literalistic religious worldview. If, for instance, a Hadeeth says that the
Dajjaal will stride from one continent to another in a single bound, then
this is taken absolutely literally. Science is disregarded, despite the fact
that in Islaam there is absolutely no difference (linguistically or
otherwise), between “Science” (Ìlm) and “Knowledge” (Ìlm). So,
despite the fact that the Dajjaal literally being so tall as to physically
stride from one continent to another in a single bound of his physical
legs, would constitute him being so tall that he bumped his head on the
moon, it is no matter. If a tradition states that there will be the letters Kaf
Fa Ra’ written on the Dajjaal’s forehead “So that all, literate or illiterate
can read it,” it is taken to mean that there are literally these letters
written on his forehead in Àrabic. It is not considered that if this were
the case then an “illiterate” person could NOT read them (since they are,
by definition, not able to read if they are “illiterate”). It is not considered
that this might instead be referring to the fact that the Dajjaal’s “Kufr”
(rejection of truth), or status as a “Kaafir” is BLATANT, APPARENT,
for ALL to see. No, it must mean that there are three literal Arabic
letters on his forehead, and unless and until such a man appears and rises
to power, then this camp will not take notice. This camp is perhaps the
most intellectually foreign, and diffcult to comprehent, to modern
thinkers of any nationality or culture. Naturally, that camp is not the
target audience of this book and little or no time will be spent arguing
with those of that perspective.
The problem of these two erroneous camps is compounded by a
third camp from outside the boundaries of Islaam, which views such
things as superstition in and of themselves; that denies the possibility of
a science of Prophecy, that has been so precise thus far. This camp
14
neither believes in the prophesied of the Dajjaal, nor in the Divine origin
of Scriptures. Scriptures, if accepted at all, are viewed as the words of
“good men” (which some things regarded as such indeed are). However,
they do not even consider possible the notion of the Qur’aan, the
“Recitation” sent from God, via a literal species referred to as
“Malaa’ikah” in Àrabic, to mankind, LITERALLY, and word-for-
word... Such a notion is regarded as absolutely preposterous; the
superstition of a primitive people from ages past. For such people we
must begin at the beginning. We must lay the foundation before we erect
the ediface. We must demonstrate that not only are there a myriad of
prophecies foretelling this day and age, and the himself “Antichrist,” but
also that prophecies abound within the Qur’aan - far beyond probability
- which prove it to be more than conjecture or guesswork. If and when
such a premise is accepted, then it further validates and demonstrates the
plausibility of its origin from this enigmatic species of “Malaa’ikah” that
we in the West term “Angels.”
For example, near the end of Soorah 10 there is a prophecy
referring to Firon (Pharoah) where the Qur’aan says that the Firon was
“washed up shore” and “will be a sign for future generations.” The
sign to those who were skeptical about the death of the Firon.
In the Qur’aan itself, within some of its Suwar (Chapters), it is
foretelling of future events that have today come to fruition. It tells the
story of the Exodus from Egypt, in which Moses and the Hebrews
enslaved to the Pharaoh of the time escape:
“And We made the Bani Isra’il (Children of Israel) to pass through

the sea, then Firon (Pharoah) and his armies followed them for
oppression and tyranny; until when drowning overtook him, he
said: I believe that there is no god but He in Whom the Bani Isra’il
believe and I am of those who submit. What! now! and indeed you
disobeyed before and you were of the mischief-makers. Today, we
will preserve your body, to set you up as a lesson for future
generations. Verily, many among mankind are totally oblivious to
our signs.” Al-Qur’aan, Soorah Yunus 10:90-92
15
‫ﺳﺮَاﺋِﻴﻞَ ِﺑ َﺒﻨِﻲ َوﺟَﺎ َو ْزﻧَﺎ‬ْ ِ‫ﺤ َﺮ إ‬ ْ ‫ن َﻓَﺄ ْﺗ َﺒ َﻌ ُﻬ ْﻢ ا ْﻟ َﺒ‬

ُ ‫ﻋ ْﻮ‬
َ ‫ﺟﻨُﻮ ُد ُﻩ ِﻓ ْﺮ‬
ُ ‫ﻋ ْﺪوًا َﺑ ْﻐﻴًﺎ َو‬ َ ‫ﺣﺘﱠﻰ َو‬ َ ‫ق َأ ْد َر َآ ُﻪ إِذَا‬
ُ ‫ا ْﻟ َﻐ َﺮ‬
‫ل‬
َ ‫ﺖ ﻗَﺎ‬ ُ ‫ﻻ إِﻟِـﻪَ ﻻ َأﻧﱠ ُﻪ ﺁﻣَﻨ‬‫ﺖ اﱠﻟﺬِي ِإ ﱠ‬ ْ ‫ﻞ َﺑﻨُﻮ ِﺑ ِﻪ ﺁ َﻣ َﻨ‬ َ ‫ﺳﺮَاﺋِﻴ‬
ْ ‫ﻦ َوَأ َﻧ ْﺎ ِإ‬
َ ‫ﻦ ِﻣ‬ َ ‫ﺴِﻠﻤِﻴ‬
ْ ‫ن ا ْﻟ ُﻤ‬
َ ‫ﺖ َو َﻗ ْﺪ ﺁﻵ‬ َ ‫ﺼ ْﻴ‬
َ ‫ﻋ‬ َ
‫ﻞ‬
ُ ‫ﺖ َﻗ ْﺒ‬َ ‫ﻦ َوآُﻨ‬ َ ‫ﻦ ِﻣ‬
َ ‫ﺴﺪِﻳ‬ِ ‫ﻚ ُﻧﻨَﺠﱢﻴﻚَ ﻓَﺎ ْﻟ َﻴ ْﻮ َم ا ْﻟ ُﻤ ْﻔ‬ َ ‫ن ِﺑ َﺒ َﺪ ِﻧ‬
َ ‫ﻦ ِﻟ َﺘﻜُﻮ‬
ْ ‫ﻚ ِﻟ َﻤ‬َ ‫ﺧ ْﻠ َﻔ‬
َ ‫ن ﺁ َﻳ ًﺔ‬‫ﻦ َآﺜِﻴﺮًا َوِإ ﱠ‬ َ ‫س ﱢﻣ‬ ِ ‫اﻟﻨﱠﺎ‬
‫ﻦ‬
ْ‫ﻋ‬
َ ‫ن ﺁﻳَﺎﺗِﻨَﺎ‬ َ ‫َﻟﻐَﺎ ِﻓﻠُﻮ‬
The Qur’aan prophesizes that the body of the Pharaoh will be preserved
for future generations. This was proven correct when the mummy of
Merneptah (widely considered to be the Pharaoh of the Exodus) was
discovered well preserved in 1898, and it can be seen on display in the
Royal Mummies Room of the Egyptian Museum, Cairo. Even though,
this event occurred over 3000 years ago (more than 1600 years before
Muhammad) according to both archaeological and Biblical data, the
Qur’aan predicted that the body of the Pharaoh would be preserved as a
sign for future generations, which is nowhere to be found in the Biblical
version. Thus, the Qur’aan adds this extra comment, to prove to future
generations that it is not the mere words of a teacher or law giver.
A very interesting prophecy relates to the moon landing (which
occurred in 1969). Chapter 54 of the Qur’aan is entitled “The Moon”
and starts right away by giving us news about the splitting of the moon
as a sign that the end of the world is drawing close.
“The Hour is near, and the moon is cleft asunder.” Al-Qur’aan,

Sooratu-l-Qamar 54:1
‫ﻖ ا ْﻟ َﻘ َﻤ ُﺮ‬
‫ﺸﱠ‬
َ ‫ﻋ ُﺔ وَاﻧ‬
َ ‫ﺖ اﻟﺴﱠﺎ‬
ِ ‫ا ْﻗ َﺘ َﺮ َﺑ‬
Many of the second camp described, take this to mean that the moon
itself at some point had been magically split in two by Muhammad.
Thinking that this will somehow verify the prophethood of Muhammad
to those who do not believe, they in fact compound the case against so-
called “Islaam” by making it appear to be the most mythological and
primitive of religious worldviews.
16
Nevertheless, when did the prophecy of “The moon has split”

come to pass? This does not mean that the moon was split into two equal
proportions. If this were the case then we would see a fault line dividing
the moon in half. If this were the case - that God split the moon to prove
the Prophethood of Muhammad - then one would imagine the fault
would be left to bear witness of this to future generations.
In reality, parts of the moon HAVE in fact left its surface. They are
simply no longer a part of the moon. So, the prophecy does not refer to
the landing on the moon or to the first step made by Neil Armstrong but
to the fact that Armstrong and Aldrin collected 21 kilograms of lunar
rocks to bring back to earth. Just as the Qur’aan tells of the Jinn having
previously flown into outer space and trying to spy on the Malaa’ikah in
the “fortresses in the heavens” (then being shot down by a “clear and
visible flame”), the space travel of humankind is foretold as the
“drawing closer” of “the Hour.” Quite obviously, the “Hour” was not
at hand, nor even near, when Muhammad was performing his ministry.
It is clear that this MUST have been a future reference. Interesting also
is the term “Hour” instead of “Day.” For we are told that the Day itself
is quite lengthy in measure. Yet here we see “Hour” used to specify that
the actual time of “apocalypse” within this “Day of Judgment” is “near
at hand.” Thus, this sign narrows down the portion of the “Day of
Judgment” that is relevant.
The prophecy was fulfilled at the very moment the astronauts left
the moon in the lunar module containing 21 kilograms of rocks that had
belonged to the moon. This can be confirmed by checking the definition
of “split” in any dictionary, among the definitions given by
Dictionary.com are – “to divide, disunite, separate” The date this
prophecy came to pass was on July 21 1969. The moment the prophecy
was fulfilled is confirmed by the hour of departure of the lunar module,
which left the lunar surface at 17:54:1 (Universal Time) or 1:54:1 (EDT)
and as you have seen above, Aayah 54:1 is the Aayah that deals with the
prophecy.
17
“The Hour is near, and the moon is cleft asunder. But if they see a
Sign, they turn away, and say, [This is only] transient magic.’ They
reject (the warning) and follow their (own) lusts but every matter
has its appointed time.” Al-Qur’aan, 54:1-3
‫ﺖ‬
ِ ‫ﻋ ُﺔ ا ْﻗ َﺘ َﺮ َﺑ‬
َ ‫ﻖ اﻟﺴﱠﺎ‬
‫ﺸﱠ‬َ ‫ﺤ ٌﺮ َو َﻳﻘُﻮﻟُﻮا ُﻳ ْﻌ ِﺮﺿُﻮا ﺁ َﻳ ًﺔ َﻳ َﺮوْا ا ْﻟ َﻘ َﻤ ُﺮ َوإِن وَاﻧ‬
ْ ِ‫ﺴ َﺘ ِﻤ ﱞﺮ َو َآ ﱠﺬﺑُﻮا ﺳ‬
ْ ‫وَا ﱠﺗ َﺒﻌُﻮا ﱡﻣ‬
‫ﺴ َﺘ ِﻘ ﱞﺮ َأ ْﻣ ٍﺮ َو ُآﻞﱡ َأ ْهﻮَاء ُه ْﻢ‬
ْ ‫ﱡﻣ‬
Obviously it would not have been “old magic” in Muhammad’s time to

see the moon split in two pieces! Who among all the prophets,
magicians, sorcerers and the like have EVER been recorded as splitting
the moon in two physical halves? Notice also that there is mention
ONLY of the “splitting” of the moon and never of the rejoining of it.
So “the moon has split,” then people are to see “a great miracle,”
yet they still “disbelieved.” Could not the “great miracle” be the
fulfillment of this Qur’aanic prophecy?
Some prophecies occurred during the lifetime of Muhammad, such
as the foretelling the Muhammad would return to Mecca in conquest.
Obviously if he did not KNOW this from the revelation of the Qur’aan
then it would be prophetic suicide to lay everything on the line and say
that his then small number of followers would take Mecca.
“Lo! He Who has given you the Qur’aan for a law will surely bring
you home again. Say: My Lord is Best Aware of him who brings
guidance and him who is in error manifest.” Al-Qur’aan, Sooratu-l-
Qasas 28:85
‫ن‬
‫ض اﱠﻟﺬِي ِإ ﱠ‬
َ ‫ﻚ َﻓ َﺮ‬
َ ‫ﻋَﻠ ْﻴ‬
َ ‫ن‬
َ ‫ك ا ْﻟ ُﻘﺮْﺁ‬
َ ‫ﻋَﻠ ُﻢ ﱠرﺑﱢﻲ ﻗُﻞ َﻣﻌَﺎ ٍد ِإﻟَﻰ َﻟﺮَا ﱡد‬
ْ ‫ﻦ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟ ُﻬﺪَى ﺟَﺎء ﻣَﻦ َأ‬
ْ ‫ﻓِﻲ ُه َﻮ َو َﻣ‬
ٍ‫ﻦ ﺿَﻠَﺎل‬ ٍ ‫ﱡﻣﺒِﻴ‬
This Aayah was revealed when Muhammad’s situation was dire, due to
the hostility from the people of Mecca (which was his home). The
hostility was due to the tribal chiefs of the time, who rejected his
message and oppressed him and his followers. It was a hopeless
18
situation, most of his followers had already migrated to Madinah (a

nearby city), now it was his turn. He migrated as a refugee and then
returned several years later as a conqueror, fulfilling yet another
prophecy.
Among other clearly fulfilled prophecies in the Qur’aan are: The
Romans defeating the Persians. The Qur’aan says: “The Roman
Empire has been defeated in a land close by; but they, even after
this defeat, will gain victory in a few years. Allaah’s is the command,
in the past and in the future. On that day shall the believers rejoice,
with the help of Allaah, He helps whom He wills. And He is the
mighty and the most Merciful. It is the promise of Allaah. Allaah
never departs from His promise: but most men understand not.
They know the outward of this world’s life, but of the Hereafter they
are absolutely heedless..” Al-Qur’aan, Soorah ar-Rum 30:2-7
‫ﺖ‬
ِ ‫ﻏِﻠ َﺒ‬
ُ ‫ض َأ ْدﻧَﻰ اﻟﺮﱡو ُﻣﻔِﻲ‬ ِ ‫ﻏَﻠ ِﺒ ِﻬ ْﻢ َﺑ ْﻌ ِﺪ ﻣﱢﻦ وَهُﻢ ا ْﻟَﺄ ْر‬ َ ‫ﺳ َﻴ ْﻐِﻠﺒُﻮ َﻧﻔِﻲ‬ َ ‫ﻀ ِﻊ‬ ْ ‫ﻦ ِﺑ‬َ ‫ﺳﻨِﻴ‬
ِ ‫ﻞ ﻣِﻦ ا ْﻟَﺄ ْﻣ ُﺮ ِﻟﱠﻠ ِﻪ‬ ُ ‫َﻗ ْﺒ‬
‫ح َو َﻳ ْﻮ َﻣ ِﺌ ٍﺬ َﺑ ْﻌ ُﺪ َوﻣِﻦ‬
ُ ‫ﺼ ِﺮ َﻳ ْﻔ َﺮ‬ْ ‫ﺼ ُﺮ اﻟﻠﱠﻪِ ا ْﻟ ُﻤ ْﺆ ِﻣﻨُﻮ َﻧ ِﺒ َﻨ‬
ُ ‫ﻋ َﺪ ا ْﻟ َﻌﺰِﻳ ُﺰ َو ُه َﻮ َﻳﺸَﺎء ﻣَﻦ ﻳَﻨ‬ ْ ‫ﻟَﺎ اﻟﻠﱠﻪِ اﻟ ﱠﺮﺣِﻴ ُﻤ َﻮ‬
‫ﻒ‬
ُ ‫ﺨِﻠ‬ْ ‫ﻋ َﺪ ُﻩ اﻟﻠﱠ ُﻪ ُﻳ‬ ْ ‫ﻦ َو‬ ‫س َأ ْآ َﺜ َﺮ َوَﻟ ِﻜ ﱠ‬ ِ ‫ن ﻟَﺎ اﻟﻨﱠﺎ‬ َ ‫ﻦ ﻇَﺎهِﺮًا َﻳ ْﻌَﻠﻤُﻮ َﻧ َﻴ ْﻌَﻠﻤُﻮ‬َ ‫ﺤﻴَﺎ ِة ﱢﻣ‬
َ ‫ﻦ َو ُه ْﻢ اﻟ ﱡﺪ ْﻧﻴَﺎ ا ْﻟ‬
ِ‫ﻋ‬ َ
‫ﺧ َﺮ ِة‬
ِ ‫ن ُه ْﻢ اﻟْﺂ‬ َ ‫ﻏَﺎ ِﻓﻠُﻮ‬
The Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire suffered a massive defeat at the

hands of the Persians who captured Jerusalem in 614, and after that
Egypt and Syria fell, and Constantinople was laid siege to; “a land close
by.” The pagan Arabs delighted in this, as it seemed to signal to them
the success of idolatry over the followers of revelation. When this verse
was revealed it seemed impossible that Rome would recover. The word,
translated “a few,” actually means from three to nine years. Ubayy, a
pagan Arab, bet Aboo Bakr one hundred camels that this would never
occur. By the year 623, Heraclius, the Byzantine Roman Emperor, took
to the field and vanquished the Persians in a series of battles,
culminating in the battle of Niveveh in 627. Ubayy had been killed, so
his relatives paid the dept. At this same time the Muslims had been
victorious over the pagan Quraysh and were rejoicing, as the Qur’aan
foretold.
19
“Condemned are the works of Aboo Lahab, and he is condemned.

His money and whatever he has accomplished will never help him.
He has incurred the blazing Hell.” Al-Qur’aan, Sooratu-l-Lahab
111:1-3
‫ﺖ‬
ْ ‫ﺐ َأﺑِﻲ َﻳﺪَا َﺗ ﱠﺒ‬
ٍ ‫ﻏﻨَﻰ َو َﺗ ﱠﺒﻤَﺎ َﻟ َﻬ‬
ْ َ‫ﻋ ْﻨ ُﻪ أ‬
َ ‫ﺼﻠَﻰ وَﻣَﺎ ﻣَﺎُﻟ ُﻪ‬
ْ ‫ﺴ َﻴ‬
َ ‫ﺴ َﺒ‬
َ ‫ت ﻧَﺎرًا َآ‬
َ ‫ﺐ ذَا‬
ٍ ‫َﻟ َﻬ‬
Aboo Lahab was the most bitter enemy of Muhammad, and opposed the
establishment of Islaam to the utmost of his power. In this verse it
explicitly states that Aboo Lahab, would be condemned to Hell (because
he would never accept Islaam and thus die in disbelief). Even after 11
years after this Qur’aanic revelation, Aboo Lahab never accepted Islaam
and thus died Islaamically condemned. In view of the fact that he was
Muhammad’s most bitter enemy, logic and experience suggest that it is
unwise to make such a declaration, for Aboo Lahab could have very
easily disproved the Qur’aan by pretending to believe just like Aboo
Sufyaan did. Why did Aboo Lahab waste this golden opportunity? What
made Muhammad so certain that even in ten years Aboo Lahab would
not exploit this tempting opportunity? At any rate past experience does
not preclude knowledge of the future.
The Qur’aan says: “You shall enter the Sacred Masjid, if Allaah wills,
secure, heads shaved, hair curt short, and without fear” Al-Qur’aan,
Sooratu-l-Fath 48:28
‫ﻞ اﱠﻟﺬِي ُه َﻮ‬
َ‫ﺳ‬
َ ‫ﻦ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟ ُﻬﺪَى َرﺳُﻮَﻟ ُﻪ َأ ْر‬
ِ ‫ﻖ َودِﻳ‬
‫ﺤﱢ‬َ ‫ﻈ ِﻬ َﺮ ُﻩ ا ْﻟ‬
ْ ‫ﻋﻠَﻰ ِﻟ ُﻴ‬
َ ‫ﻦ‬
ِ ‫ﺷﻬِﻴﺪًا ﺑِﺎﻟﻠﱠﻪِ َو َآﻔَﻰ ُآﱢﻠ ِﻪ اﻟﺪﱢﻳ‬
َ
This passage was revealed after the Prophet had been stopped by the
Quraysh from making ‘Umrah (the Minor Pilgrimage) and a treaty was
made between the Muslims and pagans at Hudaybia, six years after the
Prophet’s emigration from Mecca. From this position of weakness, in
merely two years the verse was fulfilled, Mecca was captured, and the
Muslims performed the pilgrimage, shaving their heads, and some
20
cutting their hair.
The Qur’aan says: “Allaah has promised to those of you who believe,
and do good deeds, that He will surely grant them in the land
inheritance of power as He granted it to those before them; that He
will establish in authority their religion which He has chosen for
them. And that He will change their state after fear to one of
security and peace. They will worship Me alone and not associate
aught with Me.” Al-Qur’aan, Soorah an-Noor 24:55
‫ﻋ َﺪ‬
َ ‫ﻦ اﻟﻠﱠ ُﻪ َو‬ َ ‫ﻋ ِﻤﻠُﻮا ﻣِﻨ ُﻜ ْﻢ ﺁ َﻣ ُﻨﻮا اﱠﻟﺬِﻳ‬ َ ‫ت َو‬ِ ‫ﺨِﻠ َﻔ ﱠﻨﻬُﻢ اﻟﺼﱠﺎِﻟﺤَﺎ‬ ْ ‫ﺴ َﺘ‬ ْ ‫ض ﻓِﻲ َﻟ َﻴ‬
ِ ‫ﻒ آَﻤَﺎ ا ْﻟَﺄ ْر‬ َ ‫ﺨَﻠ‬ ْ ‫ﺳ َﺘ‬
ْ‫ﻦ ا‬َ ‫اﱠﻟﺬِﻳ‬
‫ﻦ َﻗ ْﺒِﻠ ِﻬ ْﻢ ﻣِﻦ‬
‫ﺧ ْﻮ ِﻓ ِﻬ ْﻢ َﺑ ْﻌ ِﺪ ﻣﱢﻦ وَﻟَ ُﻴﺒَ ﱢﺪﻟَ ﱠﻨﻬُﻢ َﻟ ُﻬ ْﻢ ا ْر َﺗﻀَﻰ اﱠﻟﺬِي دِﻳ َﻨ ُﻬ ُﻢ َﻟ ُﻬ ْﻢ َوَﻟ ُﻴ َﻤ ﱢﻜ َﻨ ﱠ‬
َ ‫ﻟَﺎ َﻳ ْﻌ ُﺒﺪُو َﻧﻨِﻲ َأ ْﻣﻨًﺎ‬
‫ن‬
َ ‫ﺸ ِﺮآُﻮ‬
ْ ‫ﻚ َﺑ ْﻌ َﺪ َآ َﻔ َﺮ َوﻣَﻦ ﺷَ ْﻴﺌًﺎ ِﺑﻲ ُﻳ‬ َ ‫ﻚ َذِﻟ‬ َ ‫ن ُه ُﻢ َﻓُﺄ ْوَﻟ ِﺌ‬ َ ‫ﺳﻘُﻮ‬
ِ ‫ا ْﻟﻔَﺎ‬
And also: “Say to those who deny faith: soon you will be vanquished,
and driven together to hell; and evil is the resting-place.” Al-
Qur’aan, Sooratu-l Ìmran 3:12
‫ﻦ ﻗُﻞ‬
َ ‫ن ﺳَ ُﺘ ْﻐﻠَﺒُﻮنَ َآ َﻔﺮُو ْا ﱢﻟﱠﻠﺬِﻳ‬
َ ‫ﺸﺮُو‬
َ‫ﺤ‬ْ ‫ﺟ َﻬ ﱠﻨ َﻢ إِﻟَﻰ َو ُﺗ‬
َ ‫ﺲ‬
َ ‫ا ْﻟﻤِﻬَﺎ ُد َو ِﺑ ْﺌ‬
“When comes the help of Allaah and Victory, and you see the people
enter Allaah’s Deen (Religion/Way) in multitudes.” Al-Qur’aan,
Soorah an-Nasr 110:1-2
‫ﺼ ُﺮ ﺟَﺎء ِإذَا‬
ْ ‫ﺢ اﻟﻠﱠﻪِ َﻧ‬
ُ ‫ﺖ وَا ْﻟ َﻔ ْﺘ‬
َ ‫س َو َرَأ ْﻳ‬
َ ‫ن اﻟﻨﱠﺎ‬
َ ‫ﺧﻠُﻮ‬
ُ ‫ﻦ ﻓِﻲ َﻳ ْﺪ‬
ِ ‫َأ ْﻓﻮَاﺟًﺎ اﻟﻠﱠﻪِ دِﻳ‬
The first Aayah was revealed at a time of the Muslim’s weakness,

promising the righteous victory, and the second predicting the peoples
entering into Islaam in crowds, and so it came to pass, after the capture
of Mecca, and in the time of the Caliphs Aboo Bakr, Ùmar, Ùthman
and Àli, who were from the most pious companions of the Prophet,
were established by Allaah in the land, defeating the Persian and Roman
empires, so that Islaam was established from Spain to parts of China in a
mere twenty years. This, in part, fulfills another prophecy of the
21
Qur’aan: “It is He who has sent the Rasool (Messenger) with

guidance, and the religion of truth, to make it triumphant over all
religions.” Al-Qur’aan, Soorah at-Tawbah 9:32
‫ن‬
َ ‫ﻄ ِﻔﺆُو ْا أَن ُﻳﺮِﻳﺪُو‬
ْ ‫ﻻ اﻟﻠّ ُﻪ َو َﻳ ْﺄﺑَﻰ ِﺑَﺄ ْﻓﻮَا ِه ِﻬ ْﻢ اﻟﻠّﻪِ ﻧُﻮ َر ُﻳ‬
‫ن َآ ِﺮ َﻩ َوَﻟ ْﻮ ﻧُﻮ َر ُﻩ ُﻳ ِﺘﻢﱠ أَن ِإ ﱠ‬
َ ‫ا ْﻟﻜَﺎ ِﻓﺮُو‬
Christianity, Judaism, paganism have never regained any lasting

dominance since the coming of Islaam. Certainly other religions remain,
as they always have when a new prophet would come. Nevertheless,
they have not continued to grow and thrive at the rate in which they once
did. The secular philosophies of communism and capitalism are in the
process of being dealt death blows. It is estimated that at the present rate
of growth Islaam will over take Christianity by 2025 in terms of
numbers. See also Qur’aan 48:18-21 and 1:13, which promise victory
and the taking of booty; which were also fulfilled.
With all of this collectively borne in mind, it is clear that to the
unbiased mind, prophecy exists and is also found within an Islaamic
context (most notably the Qur’aan). With that in mind, as the foundation
of the discussion of the prophecies of the “Maseehu-d-Dajjaal,” it is
clear that prophecy is a reality that has accurately predicted events that
came to pass; often far beyond the scope of what may have been the
personal understanding of the individual prophesying. Bearing this in
mind, it is also clear (and will be made more so), that the prophecies of
the Maseehu-d-Dajjaal, the Antichrist, are not merely “lucky guesses”
but the data produced by the science of prophecy.
22
Prophecies of this Age

Prophecies abound from Muhammad and the Ahlu-l-Bayt (a Qur’aanic
phrase: “People of Muhammad’s House,” used to designate
Muhammad, Àli, Faatimah and their offspring), regarding the “end of
the Age” or Zamaan. However, before we get to where we’re going, we
need some preparation in the form assuring that the reader understands
that without question we are living in a time, THE time, that was
prophesied so long ago. The Sixth Shi’ite Imaam Ja`faru-s-Saadiq, the
Great, Great Grandson of Àli and Faatimah, is recorded as saying:
“The believer, in the time of Qa’im (the Imaam who will Rise), while
in the east will be able to see his brother in the west and he who is in
the west will be able to see his brother in the east”
Notes: Az-Zanjani, Aqa’id, p. 255
In what other age besides this one could such a thing occur? With video
cameras, televisions and now even cell phones with cameras a
commonplace reality, this prophecy is fulfilled to the letter.
As well, just a few of the literally HUNDREDS of signs that have
been fulfilled include:
“Camels will no longer be used as a means of transport; People will

ride on saddles that aren’t saddles.” We see this fulfilled with the
advent of the automobile.
“The distance on Earth will become short.” We see this fulfilled with
modern forms of transportation like automobiles, trains and airplanes.
Far distances are spanned in a short period of time.
“Horses will not be used in wars.” This too has been replaced by
modern forms of warfare, airplanes, guerrilla warfare and the like.
23
“Jews will gather again to live in Bilad Canaan.” This of course has
proven one of the most central matters to the instability of world peace.
What seemed like an impossibility actually came to pass.
“Very tall buildings will be built.” This one is perhaps an

UNDERSTATEMENT it was fulfilled so accurately.
“Allaah will send a disease to fornicators that will have no cure.” We

see a global crisis in AIDS as well as in rampant Sexually Transmitted
Diseases in general.
“Men will pass by people’s graves and say: ‘Would that I were in his
place’.” Of course in no other recorded generation has there been the
epidemic of suicides at the rate that we now see.
“Two large groups of people will fight one another, and there will be
many casualties; they will both be following the same religion.” This
occurred in World War Two, where both the Nazi’s and Britain along
with the United States (Yajuj and Majuj), both claimed to be the true
representatives of Christianity.
“Women will be wearing clothes but not wearing clothes.” The

popular western culture of the day propagandizes clothes that are barely
coverings. While there are some somewhat modest women, the majority
of the youth dress little different than prostitutes on the street.
Saoban reported that Muhammad said: “‘It is near that the
nations will call one another against you just as the eaters call one
another at their dishes.’ Some body enquired: ‘Shall we be few at
that time?’ He said: ‘No, you will be numerous at that time, but you
will be so many rubbishes like the rubbishes of a torrent. Allaah will
then certainly take away the fear of you from the minds of your
enemies and will certainly throw weakness into your hearts.’ Some
body enquired: ‘O Rasool’ullaah, what will be (the cause of)
weakness?’ He replied: ‘Love of this world and fear of death.’”
24
Notes: Aboo Dawood 24
For quite some time now, all of the Ummah in general and the Shi’ites in
particular, have been looking forward to the rise of Imaamu-l-Mahdi (the
prophecied “Guided Leader”). It is regarded as an established fact, like
the Day of Judgment itself, for which no fixed time or period is sounded.
It is said to be something that none of us can know, we have only to
focus our attention on the indications assigned for it. To investigate, to
find out and to distinguish between these signals and tokens for the re-
appearance of Imaam is of immense importance. We can assume on the
basis of these indications (not for certain) that the time and period is not
far away (although this does not necessitate one particular interpretation
of prophecies of the Mahdist era). Due to this more emphasis is given on
these signs from the beginning itself.
2. There are two types of indications and signs:
The signals given by Ahlu-l-Bayt are not of one type. Some of the signs
told by the descendants of Muhammad are unchangeable while some of
them are inconstant. The Shi’ite Imaam Ja`faru-s-Saadiq has said that
five signs before the re-appearance of “al-Qa’im” would appear.
1. The appearance of Al-Yemani (the Yemenite)

2. The revolt of As-Sufyaani
3. The mysterious voice
4. The murder of a pious man between Safah and Murwa
5. The sinking of Sufyaani’s army between Mecca and Madina at a
place known as Baidaar.
Bihaaru-l-’Anwaar page 254, volume 52

More pronounced than the afforementioned ahadeeth, are the following
which literally mark this approximate generation (around 1,400 years
from Muhammad), as being the time of “the Hour.” The corroboration
with such specific dates with the fulfillment of so many prophecies, is
25
perhaps the most impressive – and otherwise unprecedented – of

Islaamic proofs that this (and no far off date), is the time of the Dajjaal’s
ascension to political and/or military power. Nevertheless, there is yet
another manifestation that can truly be called his “final” manifestation.
The details of this will be addressed in future texts, due to the sheer
length of such detailing if not also for the sake of taking this all one
issue at a time.
26
Can any change be anticipated in the things predicted?

As to whether or not there can be any change in the anticipated things
predicted is an issue largely defined by what school of thought one
adheres to. To the general Sunni perspective, one can almost always say
that no, there is no changeability in such signs. In fact, to suggest such is
often considered blasphemous to the extremists. However, one of the
defining features of the Imaamist, Shi’ite perspective is that of “bada’a”
or “change” in events that were anticipated. Such change can often be
looked at through temporal eyes as being a change in the Will of God.
For this many Sunni’s rail against the Shi’ite theology. Nevertheless, we
see such instances in the case of the Prophet Jonah, who was told of
Ninevah’s destruction and was himself disappointed to find out that
repentance thwarted this pending Divine Wrath. Naturally, there are
many Sunni camps that do maintain a belief in changability.
Changeability (bada’a) among the Shi’ites is an important belief
founded on Qur’aanic Signs (Aayaat). In the light of Shi’ite tenets, the
mishaps, calamities and other ugly incidents which are expected can be
changed, altered and averted. This is akin to saying that a man in the
middle of the street has the destiny of being hit by an oncoming car,
UNLESS he or someone else acts to move him out of the way, or
otherwise stop the oncoming car. Destiny is viewed as a partnership with
freewill; something that appears fixed within the context of Time-Space,
but not from a transcendant perspective.
Accordingly the problems of livelihood age, hunger, prestige
honour, insult and disgrace, incurable diseases, earthquakes, famine,
revolution and war which are about to engulf the mankind can be turned
aside from or there may be increase or decrease in their severity.
God can change what we – from our Time-Space perspective
consider – “destiny” and is not subject to any control or confinement of
action. God can set right the things, comes to the rescue of those who
have lost the hope, has authority to control the things when they are
uncontrollable and manages the affairs when they are apparently
unmanageable. The changes and alterations should not be amounted to
27
the repentance of God for the decision given previously. Such types of
change would be called to have its base on ignorance and can be
presumed that the decision when first given was due to lack of
knowledge but after having gained the complete knowledge the change
was taken place.
All of this seeming paradox can be understood when we realize
that Time-Space is the creation of the One who is not fettered by
concepts of “before” and “after” which It (or “He” if you will), created.
28
Hastening the Rise

Regarding the “change,” in manners in which prophecy manifests, both
of these narrations can be put as daleel (proofs from Scripture or
Ahadeeth), in which the Rise is predicted early or late. The conditions of
period and time of Rise are described in some narrations of Hadeeth. If it
will be proved that the Rise is alterable in occurance - late or early of
human expectation - then it will be implied that the signs can also be
altered in some cases. The following narrations can be quoted regarding
the change in re-appearance:
A narrator writes that he inquired from Ja`faru-s-Saadiq whether
there is any remedy to this replied, “Yes but it is only you people who
have disclosed this secret so the re-appearance is delayed by
Allaah.”
Bihaar, vol. 52 - 117 105
It can be explained in this way in detail that the Imaams used to hint to
their followers (literally their “Sheeyàh” or “Partisans”) about the Rise
without fixing any period. That secret was passed on to the enemies by
some mentally weak “Sheeyàh” (those who were partisans of the Ahlu-
l-Bayt, but nevertheless did not adhere to their instructions), which was
said to have angered God; and thus the re-appearance was delayed. In
other narration Ja`faru-s-Saadiq said that re-appearance was delayed
twice (Bihaar 52/117) while it was actually delayed thrice according to
another narration (Bihaar 52/289-291). This tells us a number of things,
the most important two being:
1. That the mainstream view of the 12th Imaam of Shi’ite theology

being the absolute only possibly “Imaam who will rise” or
“Imaamu-l-Qa’im” is theologically alien to the teachings of the
Ahlu-l-Bayt and their original “Sheeyàh,” and also,
29
2. That the “Plan” of God ebbs and flows with actions manifest of
human freewill. We see this not only in the case of Jonah, but also
in the delay of the Rise (Qayim), due to the disobedience of the
purported “Sheeyàh” of the Ahlu-l-Bayt.
The following sayings of Imaam can be put forward as a third example

which proves that delay or haste can possibly occur in re-appearance.
The words are follows: “Pray for early re-appearance (raja) as it
would be for your good. It would be a means to make you free from
hardship”.
Bihaar, vol. 53
Ja`faru-s-Saadiq relates that “The wrath of Allaah, on Bani Israel was

prolonged, they prayed to Allaah to pardon their sins from the
depth of their hearts continuously for a fortnight. Allaah then
commanded Moosaa (Moses) and Haroon (Aaron) through heavenly
messenger to protect them from the tyranny of Firoon. Thus
hundred and seventy years of their calamity and hardships were
reduced. So they were freed early from Allaah’s displeasure. Imaam
further added that you can also pray to Allaah to help you pardon
your sins. Like the Children of Israel you will also be freed early
from hardships. If you will not act like them Allaah would continue
to carry it upto the last stage.”
When it is evident that alterations are possible in re-appearance so also

the change is possible in the signs described for the time and period of
re-appearance. The changes and alterations are linked with appointed
and certified things. The commandments of God are not wavering and
inconstant. The Qur’aan declares “No doubt the words of God are never
vacuous.” Whatever can be said and written in the light of the teachings
of Ahlu-l-Bayt is only this that the re-appearance of Imaam either be
delayed or altered or occurs early but is not immutable.
The promise of God is never in vain and void. A person came to
Muhammad Taqi and expressed his fear regarding the possibility of
30
change and alteration in the Rise of the Mahdi. He was told by the
Shi’ite Imaam Muhammad Taqi that “the re-appearance of Imaamu-l-
Mahdi is a commandment of Allaah which is not in-expressive.”
Bihaar vol. 52, pg 251
Positive indications mean those which are willed by God so un-

changeable and will never be changed while the rest can be categorized
as vague so liable to be changed. There is no commandment of God
regarding them only their quality and characteristics is mentioned. The
appearance of Al-Yamani. The revolt of As-Sufyaani and sinking of
army, murder of a pious man and sounding of a voice from the heaven
are stamped and thus not subject to alterations. Expressive and
inexpressive signs and indications whether the certain or uncertain are
not visible in the outside world the possibility of change can not be ruled
out. Both are liable to be changed. The revolt of Sufyaani was related in
presence of Muhammad Taqi as an unchangeable sign. Accordingly an
individual enquired from Imaam whether a change is possible even in
this stable sign? The Imaam replied in the affirmative.
Bihaar, vol. 52, pg 151-250
These things are being said simply to set the backdrop for the argument
postulated by this text; that it is eschatologically feasible for this in fact
to be “the age” of the “Rise” or “Qayim” and the “revolt of as-
Sufyaani,” who is also known by the name Maseehu-d-Dajjaal. For
further exploration of these matters, the serious student of Islaamic
Eschatology should read the upcoming “The Revolution of the Mahdi.”
31
The Last Hour

Before deep exploration of the current manifestation of the Antichrist,
some significant attention must be paid to the claim that this is not only
not his only manifestation, but that there are manifestations more
notorious (hitorically speaking), and ones that occurred even thousands
of years ago.
Somewhat out of necessity (this not being the primary focus of this
book), the following is intended as somewhat of a crash-course in
historically validating such claims of the Antichrist’s antiquity.
“Children, it is the last hour; and just as you heard that Antichrist is
coming, even now many antichrists have arisen; from this we know
that it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they were not
really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained
with us; but they went out, in order that it might be shown that they
all are not of us.” 1 John 2:18-19
παιδια, εσχατη ωρα εστιν, και καθως ηκουσατε οτι αντιχριστος ε

ρχεται, και νυν αντιχριστοι πολλοι γεγονασιν: οθεν γινωσκομεν ο
τι εσχατη ωρα εστιν. εξ ημων εξηλθαν, αλλ ουκ ησαν εξ ημων: ει
γαρ εξ ημων ησαν, μεμενηκεισαν αν μεθ ημων: αλλ ινα φανερωθ
ωσιν οτι ουκ εισιν παντες εξ ημων.
John the disciple of Christ clarifies that there were actual antichrists,
actual Imposter Messiahs, who had infiltrated the ranks of the Disciple’s
and their Community based out of Jerusalem and “Damascus,” known in
the Dead Sea Scrolls to have been Qumran, not the Syrian Damascus.
Likewise, Abu Hurayrah said, “The Prophet said, ‘The Hour will not
come until 30 “Dajjaaloon” (plural of Dajjaal) appear, each of them
claiming to be an Apostle from Allaah, wealth increases, tribulations
appear and al-Harj increases.’” Someone asked, ‘What is al-Harj?’
He said, ‘Killing, killing.’”
32
These prophecies have unmistakably been fulfilled, and are being

fulfilled even now.
“By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that
Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God; and every spirit that
does not confess Jesus is not from God; and this is the spirit of the
Antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is
already in the world.” 1 John 4:2-3
εν τουτω γινωσκετε το πνευμα του θεου: παν πνευμα ο ομολογει ι

ησουν χριστον εν σαρκι εληλυθοτα εκ του θεου εστιν, και παν πν
ευμα ο μη ομολογει τον ιησουν εκ του θεου ουκ εστιν: και τουτο
εστιν το του αντιχριστου, ο ακηκοατε οτι ερχεται, και νυν εν τω
κοσμω εστιν ηδη.
“The Spirit of God” is a Qur’aanic term for Jesus Christ himself. The
Qur’aan calls him the “Rooh Allaah.”
“O Ahlu-l-Kitaab (People of the Scripture)! Do not exaggerate in

your religion nor utter anything concerning Allaah save the Truth.
The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a Rasool (Messenger) of
Allaah, and Hu’s Kalimah (Word) which Hu conveyed unto Mary,
and a Rooh (Spirit) from Hu. So believe in Allaah and Hu’s Rusul
(Messengers), and say not ‘Three’ - Stop! [it is] better for you! -
Allaah is only One God. Far is it removed from Hu’s Transcendent
Majesty that Hu should have a son. Hu’s is all that is in the heavens
and all that is in the Earth. And Allaah is sufficient as Defender.”
Al-Qur’aan, Soorah 4:171
‫ﻞ ﻳَﺎ‬ َ ‫ب َأ ْه‬
ِ ‫ﻻ ا ْﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ‬
َ ‫ﻻ دِﻳ ِﻨ ُﻜ ْﻢ ﻓِﻲ َﺗ ْﻐﻠُﻮ ْا‬َ ‫ﻋﻠَﻰ َﺗﻘُﻮﻟُﻮ ْا َو‬ َ ِ‫ﻻ اﻟﻠّﻪ‬ ‫ﻖ ِإ ﱠ‬‫ﺤﱢ‬ َ ‫ﺢ ِإ ﱠﻧﻤَﺎ ا ْﻟ‬ُ ‫ﻦ ﻋِﻴﺴَﻰ ا ْﻟ َﻤﺴِﻴ‬ ُ ‫ا ْﺑ‬
‫ل َﻣ ْﺮ َﻳ َﻢ‬ ُ ‫ح َﻣ ْﺮ َﻳ َﻢ ِإﻟَﻰ َأ ْﻟﻘَﺎهَﺎ َو َآِﻠ َﻤ ُﺘ ُﻪ اﻟﻠّﻪِ َرﺳُﻮ‬ٌ ‫ﺳِﻠ ِﻪ ﺑِﺎﻟﻠّﻪِ ﻓَﺂ ِﻣﻨُﻮ ْا ﻣﱢ ْﻨ ُﻪ وَرُو‬
ُ ‫ﻻ َو ُر‬ َ ‫ﻼ َﺛ ٌﺔ َﺗﻘُﻮﻟُﻮ ْا َو‬
َ ‫َﺛ‬
‫ﺳ ْﺒﺤَﺎ َﻧ ُﻪ وَاﺣِ ٌﺪ إِﻟَـ ٌﻪ اﻟﻠّ ُﻪ ِإ ﱠﻧﻤَﺎ ﱠﻟ ُﻜ ْﻢ ﺧَ ْﻴﺮًا اﻧﺘَﻬُﻮ ْا‬ ُ ‫ن أَن‬ َ ‫ﺴﻤَﺎوَات ﻓِﻲ ﻣَﺎ ﻟﱠ ُﻪ َوَﻟ ٌﺪ َﻟ ُﻪ َﻳﻜُﻮ‬ ‫ﻓِﻲ وَﻣَﺎ اﻟ ﱠ‬
‫ض‬
ِ ‫ﻷ ْر‬ َ ‫ﻼ ﺑِﺎﻟﻠّﻪِ َو َآﻔَﻰ ا‬ ً ‫َوآِﻴ‬
33
This passage, of 1 John 4:2-3, is saying how we can tell the REAL
Christ in John’s day. The Liar claimed the “the spirit of Christ” spoke
through him. He spoke often of SOME sort of “Gospel” yet no one has
ever read a tangible Gospel according to Paul, nor have we hear a single
word of such a “Gospel” that does not utterly contradict everything that
Jesus said in any of the dozens of Gospel accounts, including the four
canonical ones, accepted by his own One World Religion!
“For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not
acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the
Deceiver (“diablos” διαβολος or “Iblees” ‫ )إﺑﻠﻴﺲ‬and the antichrist.”
2 John 1:7
οτι πολλοι πλανοι εξηλθον εις τον κοσμον, οι μη ομολογουντες ιη

σουν χριστον ερχομενον εν σαρκι: ουτος εστιν ο πλανος και ο αν
τιχριστος.
This is an important point my Brothers and Sisters! Who was John

speaking of? Who could have possibly been denying that “the Christ”
had come in the flesh? John said that many Antichrists had already
come. Agreeing with John, the Prophet Muhammad said that there
would be 30 Antichrists in all. However, John interestingly claims that
“now it is already in the world,” referring to “the Antichrist” proper.
This is an important point that no Bible-believing Christian should allow
their pastor to simply skim over.
34
The Only Conclusion

We are told that the Antichrist is he who does not confess Jesus. Within
the Biblical context, it was Paul who didn’t “confess” anything. He
claimed to preach “the Gospel” and “Christ” but we hardly hear him
speaking of a historical Jesus, except to hear of Jesus literally attacking
him and blinding him when he was on his way to murder the Disciples.
The result of this blinding was the appearance of Paul’s scales over his
eyes, that shed like a snake’s skin once they were healed. This
phenomenon is simply unexplainable in a human context. Paul’s
reaction to the confrontation with Jesus Christ on the road to
“Damascus” (Qumran), demonstrates that we are simply not dealing
with a human being.
Beyond that, Paul peppers his statements with “the Christ” that he
appears to be speaking of more as a spiritual ideal than as an actual
historical personage. Furthermore, Paul directly claims that his words
are spoken by “Christ in him,” implying that he in fact is the Christ. This
is why Jesus Christ said that potentially all sins could be forgiven if one
repented, except for “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.” Time and time
again Paul did nothing short of blaspheming the Holy Spirit!
The immediate, programmed Paulian response to such a claim is
certainly rejection and defense of one’s master Paul. Nonetheless, the
Christian confronted with this must admit that John has to be speaking
of someone! He said THE Antichrist was among them then and there
and from this they could be sure that it was the final hour. Who was he
talking about? Your pastors, theologians and other Paulian propagandists
would have you believe that he was speaking about some intangible
“spirit!” In short, they have no idea what he is saying, or who he is
talking about. However, the Dead Sea Scrolls identify this figure as “the
Liar” who assaulted James who is called Stephen or “Àtarah” (‫) ֲע ָטרָה‬
and tried to murder him (with Paul’s disciple Luke having recorded in
Acts, the presumption that he was finished off).
The Prophet Muhammad who speaks in the same terms as the
Dead Sea Scrolls calls the Antichrist “the Liar” or “ad-Dajjaal!” As well
35
Muhammad said that the Antichrist had been alive for ages. He
described him as having strange physical deformities in appearance,
including bowlegs, a blind right eye and the like; all all precise physical
traits held in common by both Paul and the so-called “Mullah” Ùmar!
Certainly this is not mere coincidence!
In Reality, Paul was merely promoting himself as the new Savior
of mankind when he claimed Jesus Christ said, “I have appeared unto
you for this purpose: to make you a minister and a witness both of
these things which you have seen, and of those things in the which I
will appear unto you. I will deliver you from the people, and from
the Gentiles unto whom now I send you to open their eyes, and to
turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to
God that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance
among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.” Acts 26:15-
18
περι ου γενομενου μου εις ιεροσολυμα ενεφανισαν οι αρχιερεις κ

αι οι πρεσβυτεροι των ιουδαιων, αιτουμενοι κατ αυτου καταδικη
ν: προς ους απεκριθην οτι ουκ εστιν εθος ρωμαιοις χαριζεσθαι τι
να ανθρωπον πριν η ο κατηγορουμενος κατα προσωπον εχοι τους
κατηγορους τοπον τε απολογιας λαβοι περι του εγκληματος. συν
ελθοντων ουν [αυτων] ενθαδε αναβολην μηδεμιαν ποιησαμενος τ
η εξης καθισας επι του βηματος εκελευσα αχθηναι τον ανδρα: πε
ρι ου σταθεντες οι κατηγοροι ουδεμιαν αιτιαν εφερον ων εγω υπε
νοουν πονηρων.
These are profound words for a murderer, who never faced the penalties
of Jewish or Roman law, to claim that Jesus Christ said to him. This is
all the more so true considering Luke tells us of no such words from the
mouth of Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus (Qumran), when Paul
was merely told to stop murdering Jesus and his followers. Now this
Liar goes from that demand to an entirely invented commission that
conveniently was not heard by anyone but himself.
36
Again, “the Liar” is the name that Prophet Muhammad used for the
Antichrist. In Arabic he is called “Al-Maseeh Ad-Dajjaal” (‫)اﻟﺪَﺟﱠﺎل اﻟ َﻤﺴِﻴﺢ‬
meaning literally “the Imposter Messiah.” “Dajjaal” (‫ ) دَﺟﱠﺎل‬translates as
“Liar” or “Imposter.” Of course, the Prophet Muhammad did not have
copy of the Dead Sea Scrolls that we now have. So one might ask
themselves how it was that Muhammad could speak and use the exact
same terminology as those at Qumran, even though he was separated
from them in time, distance, and culture? There is no plausible
explanation save that the words of both originated from the same Divine
and Angelic Source.
The Jerusalem Community of John the Baptist, Jesus and James
was forced to bury these so-called “Dead Sea Scrolls” with the promise
that they would be revealed in the era of the Antichrist’s rise. It is not
without significance that both the Nag Hammadi “Gnostic Gospels” and
the Dead Sea Scrolls were miraculously discovered after 2,000 years,
within a few years of each other, around the same fruition of such
ahadeeth as mentioned earlier; referred to the fulfillment 1,400 years
following Muhammad.
The Antichrist is not someone who we need to wait for in the
hypothetical future. According to both the Bible and Ahadeeth, the he
was born long ago and unless stopped he will continue to work in secret
for some time to come. It is up to those of us who truly have love in our
hearts for the ONE and ONLY God, and the LAWS that He gave us to
in fact “yoke” us in willing SLAVERY or SUBMISSION to HIM. We
do not dread such slavery to the TRUE ETERNAL God. To Him do all
things Submit in willing or forced obedience.
“And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that

gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them
which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had
run, in vain.” Galatians 2:2
ανεβην δε κατα αποκαλυψιν: και ανεθεμην αυτοις το ευαγγελιον

ο κηρυσσω εν τοις εθνεσιν, κατ ιδιαν δε τοις δοκουσιν, μη πως εις
37
κενον τρεχω η εδραμον.
Paul claimed that he went to preach “the Gospel” among the Jerusalem
community (according to verse 2:1), but “privately” only the men of
“reputation,” meaning essentially the Disciples and James the Brother of
Jesus who became the Archenemy of Paul, the Liar.
This Imposter claims that he “went up by revelation.” This
“former” mass murderer of Jesus” Disciples throws the word
“revelation” around like it is nothing; as if a man can just “become” a
prophet or “Apostle” in the blinking of an eye, whilst still in the midst of
murderous oppression.
If this statement by Paul is to be considered accurate, then which
“Gospel” is Paul’s? Which “Gospel” could a man who was not even
present have possibly born witness to; and why on Earth would Paul”s
“Gospel” need to be preached “privately... lest by any means [he]
should run, or had run, in vain?” While at the same time Paul openly
preaches his “Gospel” to the pagans! He is saying only among the
traditionally monotheistic Jews did he feel the compulsion to speak in
secret about his false “Gospel.”
Before the names attributed to the “Gospels” we see “The Gospel
According to...” This is to attribute witness to the person testifying about
the contents of those accounts. In some cases the author was not present,
and surely this is one of the sources of discrepancies between the various
Gospel accounts. However, Paul himself was nowhere to be found when
these events of the Gospel were transpiring; which is strange in and of
itself since he was such a prominent Pharisee during the ministry of
Christ. Why doesn’t mainstream “Christianity” find it strange that the
one person who was not witness to anything in Jesus” life or ministry is
now essentially the figure occupying chief importance in their religion?
Nevertheless, we see Paul time and time again speaking of
“preaching the Gospel” which he clearly could not be considered an
authority on in his day when compared to the Witnesses of the Gospel;
such as those whom he persecuted, and despised. Of those authorities
such as James, “Cephas” or “Kefa” (Peter in Hebrew), and John, Paul
38
had only hateful and arrogant words:
“But from those who were reputed to be important (whatever they

were, it makes no difference to me; God doesn’t show partiality to
man) - they, I say, who were respected imparted nothing to me.”
Galations 2:6
απο δε των δοκουντων ειναι τι οποιοι ποτε ησαν ουδεν μοι διαφερ
ει: προσωπον [ο] θεος ανθρωπου ου λαμβανει εμοι γαρ οι δοκουντ
ες ουδεν προσανεθεντο,
Again, Paul preaches his “Good News” for the lawless pagans, that
“God does not show partiality towards man.” On the contrary God has,
does, and always will show partiality towards man in accordance with
man’s Faith and Righteous deeds. So a murderer cannot claim that God
will not show partiality between himself and a man who stands for the
cause of justice. Yet, with exasperating arrogance, this is exactly what
the murderer Paul claimed.
“And when James, Cephas, and John, those who seemed to be

Pillars, perceived the Grace that was given to me, they gave to me
and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship, that we should go to the
heathen, and they unto the circumcision. Only, they asked that we
remember the Poor (Evionim), which is what I was most forward to
do.” Galations 2:9-10
και γνοντες την χαριν την δοθεισαν μοι, ιακωβος και κηφας και ι
ωαννης, οι δοκουντες στυλοι ειναι, δεξιας εδωκαν εμοι και βαρν
αβα κοινωνιας, ινα ημεις εις τα εθνη, αυτοι δε εις την περιτομην:
μονον των πτωχων ινα μνημονευωμεν, ο και εσπουδασα αυτο του
το ποιησαι.
This is clear that when first confronted with the Hellenism of Paul, the
Disciples did not even want to be around him. They told them to go to
39
the “Goyim” (‫גּוֹיִם‬, “Pagans” in Hebrew). This term often gets

misunderstood in a Biblical context as meaning those who are not
ethnically of the Children of Israel. But we find Persian Magians, the
Iraqi Jonah, Africans and many others throughout the Bible who were
not of the Children of Israel. Yet it is only the pagans who are called
“Gentiles” or “Goyim” meaning strictly “pagans” in the Hebrew
language.
Essentially, before the Jerusalem community sought to kill Paul,
they thought that he was essentially just a heretic. As the mystery of
Paul unraveled they came to see that he was far worse than this and it
was their duty under the Law of God to stop him by ANY MEANS
NECESSARY.
They did not want to minister with Paul because far from being the
“pious Jew” that he claimed to be, he was in fact pagan in every
imaginable manner of Roman cultural upbringing. So he claims that they
told him to “go to the pagans” and “minister” to them. Of course he
self-justifyingly claims that this was because they “perceived the
Grace” that was given to him. These of course are Paul’s words, not
theirs. Paul was not going to say, the truth, that he was filthy, eating
filthy foods, sacrificed to false gods, proclaiming that one should remain
in a state of filth and leave the foreskin on their penis. He was not going
to say that at first they thought he was insane and later realized that he
was evil incarnate. Liars do not tell us that they are liars. Far from it.
Instead they bend the truth to suit their own interests.
As Jesus Christ said, we will “know a Tree by its fruits.” Paul’s
“fruits” were not a fulfillment of God’s Torah. Jesus claimed that he had
come not to abolish, but to fulfill the Torah. Rather Paul’s “fruits”
served only the interest of himself and the maintenance of the status quo
of the Roman colonist state. Still today his religion is taught in regions
that Europe seeks to colonize. To African slaves, in Africa itself, by the
“Conquistadors” to the true “Americans,” to the Native American tribes
in the North, in China and around the world, it is Paul’s preaching of
subservience to the status quo, and rejection of religious Law that paves
the way for a pacified slave caste and the theft of land and resources.
40
“But when Peter had come to Antioch, I opposed him to the face,
because he was to be blamed. For before that certain came from
James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he
withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the
circumcision. And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him;
insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their
dissimulation. But when I saw that they walked not uprightly
according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them
all, If you, being a Jew, live after the manner of Gentiles (Goyim,
literally “Pagans”), and not as do the Jews, why do you compel the
Gentiles to live as do the Jews?” Galations 2:11-14
οτε δε ηλθεν κηφας εις αντιοχειαν, κατα προσωπον αυτω αντεστη

ν, οτι κατεγνωσμενος ην. προ του γαρ ελθειν τινας απο ιακωβου μ
ετα των εθνων συνησθιεν: οτε δε ηλθον, υπεστελλεν και αφωριζεν
εαυτον, φοβουμενος τους εκ περιτομης. και συνυπεκριθησαν αυτ
ω [και] οι λοιποι ιουδαιοι, ωστε και βαρναβας συναπηχθη αυτων
τη υποκρισει. αλλ οτε ειδον οτι ουκ ορθοποδουσιν προς την αλη
θειαν του ευαγγελιου, ειπον τω κηφα εμπροσθεν παντων, ει συ ιου
δαιος υπαρχων εθνικως και ουχι ιουδαικως ζης, πως τα εθνη ανα
γκαζεις ιουδαιζειν.
Paul here is openly slandering the Brother of Jesus and the leader of the
Jerusalem Community. He is saying that he opposed Peter face to face
and it was supposedly Peter’s fault. He accuses James of eating with
pagans; a statement which he cannot and does not substantiate. Like the
Satan himself, he sows the seed of suspicion and gossip. Despite Paul’s
history of being completely wrong time and time again, of being a mass
murderer who went unpunished for his crimes, he acts as though he is
never in the wrong. It is always the close companions, family and
Disciples of Jesus Christ who are wrong; but never Paul.
Paul claims that Peter, “upon whom” Jesus said he would establish
his community according to the canonical accounts, “stood condemned”
41
when Paul “opposed him face to face.” Again, this is Paul’s spin on
history. Satan himself believes that God stands condemned before him.
Again, a liar does not tell you that he is a liar. He does not where a sign
or wave a banner that labels him the liar that he is. It is for this reason
that we are called to be on guard against such apostates and their man-
made religion. John declared, “...even now many antichrists have come”
1 John 2:18 He also warned against “the spirit of the Antichrist, which...
is now already in the world” 1 John 4:3
The Disciple John was not speaking in vain nor without first hand
knowledge of this “Spirit of the Antichrist.” He was not speaking
allegorically, nor in vague terms. If he said that the spirit of the
Antichrist was among them in that very day, then he clearly must have
been referring to someone or something very specific. To say that
“many Antichrists” had already come and the very spirit of “the
Antichrist” was “now already in the world” are very grandiose
statements. For a Disciple of Jesus to actually call someone an
“Antichrist” has many greater implications than merely saying that they
were bad, lawless or evil. To call someone the Antichrist means that
they are the imposter Christ, the liar who is the antithesis of everything
that the real historical Christ was, is and always will be.
42
The Liar
“Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ?
This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son.
Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father; the one who
confesses the Son has the Father also.” 1 John 2:22-23
τις εστιν ο ψευστης ει μη ο αρνουμενος οτι ιησους ουκ εστιν ο χρ

ιστος; ουτος εστιν ο αντιχριστος, ο αρνουμενος τον πατερα και τ
ον υιον. πας ο αρνουμενος τον υιον ουδε τον πατερα εχει: ο ομολ
ογων τον υιον και τον πατερα εχει.
John is commenting, in the present tense, on a specific person. There can

be no doubt that he was explicitly stating the Antichrist was among
them, then and there. So who was this self appointed Antichrist who
“denies the Son?” Jesus Christ said, “If only I testify of myself, it is a
lie!” John 5:31
εαν εγω μαρτυρω περι εμαυτου, η μαρτυρια μου ουκ εστιν αληθη
ς:
No one but Paul ever “testified of [him]self” that he was an Apostle of

Jesus Christ. Therefore, if you believe in Jesus Christ, then by this
standard Paul was a liar!
Jesus also taught, “But if he will not hear [you, then] take with
you one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses
every word may be established.” Matthew 18:16
εαν δε μη ακουση, παραλαβε μετα σου ετι ενα η δυο, ινα επι στο
ματος δυο μαρτυρων η τριων σταθη παν ρημα:
How many were witnesses to any event claimed by Paul? The answer is
none. His companions did not see Jesus Christ appear to him on the road
to Damascus, and every other word of Paul was professed to have been
43
given in dreams. Jesus Christ appear to him on the road to Damascus,

and every other word of Paul was professed to have been given in
dreams.
If the words of Paul were not those abrogating the Torah, which no
one, including Jesus Christ ever abrogated, then perhaps we could
approach his words without so much skepticism and hostility. However,
when he preaches something entirely new, entirely different than any
Prophet or the Messiah, and with those words he brings no witnesses,
then he must be taken as the Liar that he was, and is.
44
“Test Every Spirit”

“Beloved, don’t believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they
are of God, because many false prophets have gone out into the
world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit who
confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, and every
spirit who doesn’t confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is
not of God, and this is the spirit of the Antichrist, of whom you have
heard that it comes. Now it is in the world already. You are of God,
little children, and have overcome them; because greater is he who
is in you than he who is in the world. They are of the world.
Therefore they speak of the world, and the world hears them. We
are of God. He who knows God listens to us. He who is not of God
doesn’t listen to us. By this we know the spirit of truth, and the
spirit of error.” 1 John 4:1-6
Christian Brothers and Sisters, by this standard, laid down by the

Disciple of Christ, it is proven that the Prophet Muhammad is “of God.”
The Qur’aan itself speaks at length, on separate occasions regarding the
fact that Al-Maseeh, the Messiah, the Christ was none other than Jesus
ibn Maryam, Jesus the son of Mary, who came in the flesh, the
Kalimat’ullaah, the Word of Allaah; the Rooh’ullaah, the Spirit of
Allaah, and the only Nabi or Prophet to be called “Al-Maseeh” in the
entire Qur’aan.
So while, the Disciple of Christ affirms that Muhammad was “of
God,” he also makes it clear that Paul was not. For Paul claimed to
preach “the Gospel” while never being witness to the biographical
events of the historical Yashuah Ha’Mashiach. What then was Paul’s
“Good News” or “Gospel” that he preached “to the Gentiles” or
“pagans?” His “Good News” was that a god-man died to spare you from
the consequences of your own willful disobedience to God. Whilst Jesus
Christ said “Be perfect therefore as your Father in Heaven is Perfect,”
Paul said that mankind is inherently corrupt and cannot do good no
matter how hard they try. Paul said that man is justified by “faith
45
alone,” while James the Brother of Jesus stated that we are justified by
Faith and Works; exactly as Islaam teaches. Thus, Paul claimed that
Jesus and James were liars for telling us to literally “be perfect,” while
Paul said “none are righteous, not even one.”
This was Paul’s “Good News” to the pagans, good news that they
do not have to obey any spiritual law, which Paul called “the yoke of
slavery.” Good news that the Children of Israel were wrong and the
pagan Romans were right all along. This is the devil’s “Good News,”
not Jesus’.
Thus it was Paul who “speak[s] of the world, and the world hears
[him].” It was Paul who denied the historical Christ that came in the
flesh as Yashuah Ha’Mashiach. It was Paul who was being called the
Antichrist.
“I know your works, and your toil and perseverance, and that you
can’t tolerate evil men, and have tested those who call themselves
‘Apostles,’ and they are not, and found them to be Liars. You have
perseverance and have endured for my name’s sake, and have not
grown weary.” Revelation 2:2-3
οιδα τα εργα σου και τον κοπον και την υπομονην σου, και οτι ο
υ δυνη βαστασαι κακους, και επειρασας τους λεγοντας εαυτους
αποστολους και ουκ εισιν, και ευρες αυτους ψευδεις: και υπομον
ην εχεις, και εβαστασας δια το ονομα μου, και ου κεκοπιακες.
In the Book of Revelation, John further clarifies that “evil men” claimed
to be “apostles” yet were found out to be “Liars.” Again we are referred
back to the terminology of the Dead Sea Scrolls’ “Sheqer” and the
Àrabic “Dajjaal.” Who else could have claimed to have been an
Apostle? Could any but the Twelve Disciples have in fact been
“Apostles” or “Emissaries” of Christ? The Book of Revelation makes it
clear:
“The wall of the City had twelve foundations, and on them twelve
names of the Twelve Apostles of the Lamb. “ Revelation 21:14
46
και το τειχος της πολεως εχων θεμελιους δωδεκα, και επ αυτων δ

ωδεκα ονοματα των δωδεκα αποστολων του αρνιου.
The verse is not ambiguous, the “Apostles” of Christ were 12 in number.

This leaves absolutely no room for Paul the Liar and his Antichrist
deception.
“About these also Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied,

saying, ‘Behold, the Lord came with ten thousands of his holy ones,
to execute judgment on all, and to convict all the ungodly of all their
works of ungodliness which they have done in an ungodly way, and
of all the hard things which ungodly sinners have spoken against
him.’ These are murmurers and complainers, walking after their
lusts (and their mouth speaks proud things), showing respect of
persons to gain advantage. But you, beloved, remember the words
which have been spoken before by the emissaries of our Rabbi
(κυριος, koo’-ree-os), Jesus Christ. They said to you that ‘In the last
time there will be mockers, walking after their own ungodly lusts.’
These are they who cause divisions, and are sensual, not having the
Spirit. But you, beloved, keep building up yourselves on your most
holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit. Keep yourselves in the love of
God, looking for the mercy of our Rabbi Jesus Christ to eternal
life.” Jude 1:14-21
προεφητευσεν δε και τουτοις εβδομος απο αδαμ ενωχ λεγων, ιδου

ηλθεν κυριος εν αγιαις μυριασιν αυτου, ποιησαι κρισιν κατα παν
των και ελεγξαι πασαν ψυχην περι παντων των εργων ασεβειας α
υτων ων ησεβησαν και περι παντων των σκληρων ων ελαλησαν κ
ατ αυτου αμαρτωλοι ασεβεις. ουτοι εισιν γογγυσται, μεμψιμοιροι,
κατα τας επιθυμιας εαυτων πορευομενοι, και το στομα αυτων λα
λει υπερογκα, θαυμαζοντες προσωπα ωφελειας χαριν. υμεις δε, αγ
απητοι, μνησθητε των ρηματων των προειρημενων υπο των αποσ
τολων του κυριου ημων ιησου χριστου: οτι ελεγον υμιν [οτι] επ ε
47
σχατου [του] χρονου εσονται εμπαικται κατα τας εαυτων επιθυμι

ας πορευομενοι των ασεβειων. ουτοι εισιν οι αποδιοριζοντες, ψυχ
ικοι, πνευμα μη εχοντες. υμεις δε, αγαπητοι, εποικοδομουντες εαυ
τους τη αγιωτατη υμων πιστει, εν πνευματι αγιω προσευχομενοι,
εαυτους εν αγαπη θεου τηρησατε, προσδεχομενοι το ελεος του κυ
ριου ημων ιησου χριστου εις ζωην αιωνιον.
Paul, is in fact he who taught us to be double minded, how to

transgress God’s Commandments, and Torah which Jesus told us would
never pass away. Paul taught how not to follow Jesus’ instructions of
“be[ing] perfect therefore as your Father in Heaven is Perfect.” It is
Paul who taught humanity to follow his words instead, putting himself in
the place of the Messiah, self-appointed and self-anointed, thus setting
himself up as the Imposter Messiah, the Antichrist.
Jesus plainly informs us, as to who the god of this world is. It is the
Adversary, Ha’Satan, who controls the power of worldly Governments;
the same Roman colonial, Babylon system that Paul told the Jews to
obey, the same slave owners that Paul told slaves not to revolt against,
the same murderous and genocidal Emperor Nero that Paul called “a
servant of God.”
48
Al-Maseehu-d-Dajjaal
Although the word “Dajjaal” - which comes from the Arabic word
“dajal” (َ‫ﺟﻞ‬ َ ‫ ) َد‬meaning “to deceive,” “to cheat,” “to smear with tar” -
does not appear in the Qur’aan, the Dajjaal is described in considerable
detail in all major collections of Hadeeth (Documented Oral Traditions).
This includes the two well-known collections of al-Bukhari and Muslim,
especially in the sections which are concerned with “the last days,” as
well as in many other compilations of Hadeeth such as Al-Mishkatu-l-
Masabih, “The Gardens of the Righteous,” and Al-Muwatta’.
The Revolution against the Antichrist, lead by the “Mahdi” who is
the return of Elijah prophecied in the Book of Malachi, and by Jesus
himself, along with the troops of the Mahdi and Jesus Christ, is
described in the utmost detail in the Shi’a collection of Bihar Al-Anwar.
However, since the most notorious references are “Sunni” these are the
primary sources referred to herein. There are two aspects of the Dajjaal.
There is Dajjaal the individual, and there is Dajjaal as a worldwide
social and cultural phenomenon.
According to scholarly opinions, the latter two aspects will be
established before Dajjaal the individual will appear. That is, he will
appear when the support system he needs is in place throughout the
world either directly or indirectly.
Dajjaal the individual is the epitome of the Babylon System. The letters
Kaf, Fa and Ra (‫ )آﻔﺮ‬are the basic root letters of the Arabic word Kufr
(‫) ُآﻔْﺮ‬, or Kaafir (َ‫) َآ ﱠﻔﺮ‬. Kufr is to cover up and to reject. The kafir is the
one who covers up the true nature of existence - and who rejects the
Messengers who are sent by God to show people how to live in harmony
with what is within in them and with what is without them, and to
worship and have knowledge of God. The Prophet Muhammad said that
kufr is one system. The Kufr system is Dajjaal. The two aspects of
Dajjaal are in fact interlinked and indivisible.
Dajjaal is also described in the Ahadeeth as being heard all over
the world at the same time. Dajjaal will bring forth the Fire of Jahannam
(‫ ﺟَﻬَﻨﱠﻢ‬, Hell), and make it seem like Jannah (‫ﺟﻨﱠﺔ‬ َ , Garden, “Heaven”).
49
Dajjaal will talk of the Garden, and make it seem like the Fire. Two
examples of these relate to matters of justice and peace. He will
proclaim justice but he will pursue injustice, and he will proclaim peace
but he will pursue turmoil and destruction and every proclamation by
him of the so-called peace will be a deterioration of whatever is left of
peace. That is, he will do exactly opposite of what he proclaim, proving
himself to be a Liar.
From Abu Hurayra, related by Ibn Hanbal: “The Prophet, may
Allaah bless him and grant him peace, said: ‘The Prophets are like
brothers; they have different mothers but their life transaction is
one. I am the closest of all the people to Jesus son of Mary, because
there is no other Prophet between him and myself. He will come
again, and when you see him, you will recognize him. He is of
medium height and his coloring is reddish-white. He will be wearing
two garments, and his hair will look wet. He will break the cross, kill
the pigs, abolish the jizya (tax on non-Muslims, often less than the
obligatory tax paid by Muslims), and call the people to Islaam.
During his time, Allaah will end every religion and sect other than
Islaam, and will destroy the Dajjaal. Then peace and security will
prevail on earth, so that lions will graze with camels, tigers with
cattle, and wolves with sheep; children will be able to play with
snakes without coming to any harm. Jesus will remain for forty
years, then die, and the Muslims will pray for him.’”
Ibn Mas’ud, reported: “The Prophet, may Allaah bless him and grant
him peace, said: ‘On the night of the Isra (the Night Journey), I met
my father Abraham, Moses and Jesus, and they discussed the Hour.
The matter was referred first to Abraham, then to Moses, and both
said, “I have no knowledge of it.
“Then it was referred to Jesus, who said, “No-one knows about
its timing except Allaah; what my Lord told me was that the Dajjaal
will appear, and when he sees me he will begin to melt like lead.
Allaah will destroy him when he sees me. The Muslims will fight
against the kaafiroon (unbelievers), and even the trees and rocks
50
will say, O Muslim, there is a kaafir hiding behind me - come and

kill him!’ Allaah will destroy the kaafiroon, and the people will
return to their own lands.
“Then Gog and Magog will appear from all directions, eating
and drinking everything they find. The people will complain to me,
so I will pray to Allaah and He will destroy them, so that the Earth
will be filled with their stench. Allaah will send rain which will wash
their bodies into the sea. My Lord has told me that when that
happens, the Hour will be very close, like a pregnant woman whose
time is due, but her family do not know exactly when she will
deliver.” Related by Ahmad ibn Hanbal
The Antichrist is the final embodiment of all that denotes the way of
unrighteousness and iniquity. The Mahdi and his Wazir (‫ َوزِﻳﺮ‬, Advisor)
Jesus Christ will be the final human embodiment of all that it is possible
to follow in the way of Islaam.
The Qur’aan is clear as to what will happen when the forces of
Justice meet those of oppression: God gives victory to those who trust in
God, over the ones who reject God. The Qur’aan is crystal clear as to
what will happen after death. If you trusted in God and followed the way
of Prophet Muhammad and all Prophets sent to all nations since the time
of Prophet Adam, then you will be eligible for the Garden of Paradise. If
you rejected the One and Only Deen (Hebrew: ‫ דִּין‬, Àrabic: ‫ دِﻳﻦ‬, meaning
“Religious Path,” or Spiritual practice), and refused to follow the way of
the Prophets, the Way call Islaam (‫ﺳﻠَﺎم‬
ْ ‫ ِإ‬, Submission to God), then you
will be for the Fire. Right now the choice is yours to make. Either turn
from the systems, colonial ideology and religion of the Antichrist, or
perish in the flames of such civilizations, and ultimately in the Fire of
the Second Death.
51
Physical Appearance of the Antichrist

“Rasool Allaah (The Messenger of Allaah) said, ‘Shall I not tell you
about the Dajjaal a story of which no prophet told his nation? The
Dajjaal is one-eyed and will bring with him what will resemble Hell
and Paradise, and what he will call Paradise will be actually Hell; so
I warn you (against him) as Noah warned his nation against him.’”
Volume 4, Book 55, Number 554:
Narrated Abu Huraira: Prophet Muhammad told us that there are 30

Dajjaaloon (‫ َدﺟﱠﺎﻟِﻴﻦ‬, plural of Dajjaal) in all. Both Jesus and Peter warned
us that there were “Anti-Christs” among their community in those days.
In Greece there is a city called “Tarsus” which has an underground
network of waterway caves that are called “The Gates of Hades.” It was
believed that the “god” named “Hades” lived there and also that this was
a “portal” of sorts to the “Underworld” which they simply called
“Hades.” So we see that the place and the “god” were called the same
thing.
In Hebrew the word for “Hades” or “The Grave” is “Sheol” ( ‫) ְשׁאוֹל‬
meaning simply the Netherworld. It is not synonymous with “Hell”
which is “Geyhenum (‫ ) גֵּיהִנֹּם‬or the “Pit.” As well we have a man from
“Tarsus” (where the Hellenists believed Hades was), which in Hebrew
has the geamatria of “666,” whose name was “Shu’al” (‫)שׁאוּל‬ ָ in Hebrew,
or “Paul” in Greek. My brothers and sisters, the mythologies of the
ancients did not create themselves. They are often based on actual
figures and events, though these figures were those who deified
themselves, in rebellion against the One and only God.
“Yet they make the Jinn equals with Allaah, though Allaah did
create the Jinn; and they falsely, having no knowledge, attribute to
Him sons and daughters. Praise and glory be to Him! (for He is)
above what they attribute to Him!” Al-Qur’aan, Soorah 6:100
52
‫ﺟ َﻌﻠُﻮ ْا‬
َ ‫ﺷ َﺮآَﺎء ِﻟّﻠ ِﻪ َو‬
ُ ‫ﻦ‬
‫ﺠﱠ‬
ِ ‫ﺧَﻠ َﻘ ُﻬ ْﻢ ا ْﻟ‬
َ ‫ﺧ َﺮﻗُﻮ ْا َو‬
َ ‫ﻦ َﻟ ُﻪ َو‬
َ ‫ﻋ ْﻠ ٍﻢ ِﺑ َﻐ ْﻴ ِﺮ وَﺑَﻨَﺎتٍ َﺑﻨِﻴ‬
ِ ‫ﺳ ْﺒﺤَﺎ َﻧ ُﻪ‬
ُ ‫ﻋَﻤﱠﺎ وَﺗَﻌَﺎﻟَﻰ‬
‫ن‬
َ ‫ﺼﻔُﻮ‬
ِ ‫َﻳ‬
Reference to the “False-Prophet” coming “up out of the Earth” is

found in Revelation, thus confirming this correlation between Sheol and
Sha’ul just as the Greek term “Hades.”
“I saw another beast coming up out of the Earth. He had two horns
like a lamb, and he spoke like a Taniyn (dragon-crocodile). He
exercises all the authority of the first Beast in his presence. He
makes the Earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first Beast,
whose fatal wound was healed. He performs great signs, even
making fire come down out of the sky to the earth in the sight of
people. He deceives my own people who dwell on the Earth, because
of the signs he was granted to do in front of the Beast; saying to
those who dwell on on the Earth, that they should make an image to
the Beast who had been wounded by the sword and lived. It was
given to him to give breath to it, to the image of the Beast, that the
image of the Beast should both speak, and cause as many as
wouldn’t worship the image of the Beast to be killed.” Revelation
13:11-15
και ειδον αλλο θηριον αναβαινον εκ της γης, και ειχεν κερατα δυ
ο ομοια αρνιω, και ελαλει ως δρακων. και την εξουσιαν του πρωτ
ου θηριου πασαν ποιει ενωπιον αυτου. και ποιει την γην και τους
εν αυτη κατοικουντας ινα προσκυνησουσιν το θηριον το πρωτον
, ου εθεραπευθη η πληγη του θανατου αυτου. και ποιει σημεια με
γαλα, ινα και πυρ ποιη εκ του ουρανου καταβαινειν εις την γην ε
νωπιον των ανθρωπων. και πλανα τους κατοικουντας επι της γης
δια τα σημεια α εδοθη αυτω ποιησαι ενωπιον του θηριου, λεγων τ
οις κατοικουσιν επι της γης ποιησαι εικονα τω θηριω ος εχει την
πληγην της μαχαιρης και εζησεν. και εδοθη αυτω δουναι πνευμα
τη εικονι του θηριου, ινα και λαληση η εικων του θηριου και ποι
53
ηση [ινα] οσοι εαν μη προσκυνησωσιν τη εικονι του θηριου αποκ

τανθωσιν.
Thus, here we are further illuminated that the Antichrist will appear to
have been killed, when in fact he was only wounded by the sword. That
is, after his 1,000 years of being bound, he would be let back out to roam
the Earth for a time. The world “knows” he’s dead, but then he “comes
back” to life, like the Resurrection mythologies of the crucified Egyptian
“Savior” Horus. While this would seem a “miracle,” it is nothing but
deception.
As for the physical appearance of the Antichrist: “A certain man,
by name Onesiphorus, hearing that Paul had come to Iconium, went
out to meet him with his children Silas and Zeno, and his wife
Lectra, in order that he might entertain him: for Titus had informed
him what Paul was like in appearance: for he had not seen him in
the flesh, but only in the spirit. He went along the road to Lystra,
and stood waiting for him, and kept looking at the passers by
according to the description of Titus. He saw Paul coming, a man
small in size, bald-headed, bow-legged, well-built, with eyebrows
meeting, rather long-nosed, full of grace.” - Acts of Paul and Thecla
2:2-3
This description of Paul is an accepted fact by Christian scholars. As

well it is known and accepted that he was blind in his right eye. As well,
in England there is a center for the blind called “St. Paul’s Eye.”
Consider also the following quote from a Christian biographical website
(http://latter-rain.com/church/paul.htm):
“Saul was a citizen of Tarsus who would later become Paul and
considered the apostle to the Gentiles. Brought up at Jerusalem,
Paul lived with relatives, apparently in the home of a paternal aunt.
We probably know more about Paul’s appearance than any other
New Testament character. He was a man of little stature, dark-
complexioned, thin-haired upon the head, bowlegged, blind in one
eye and a great hooked nose that sprang from the point where his
54
thick eyebrows met, he was called an ‘ugly little Jew’ and was
described as having some deformity of body. The young scholar was
unimpressive physically but his brilliant mind and intense piety
attracted attention. He was considered full of grace, for sometimes
he appeared like a man and sometimes he had the face of an angel.”
The Book of Zekharyah is almost entirely about the times of John the
Baptist, Jesus Christ, and his Brother James. Immediately after
discussing Jesus, the Prophet Z’kharyah goes into an explanation of the
Antichrist. He explains him as follows.
“YHWH said to me, ’Take for yourself yet again the equipment of a
foolish shepherd. For, behold, I will raise up a shepherd in the land,
who will not visit those who are cut off, neither will seek those who
are scattered, nor heal that which is broken, nor feed that which is
sound; but he will eat the flesh of the fat sheep, and will tear their
hoofs in pieces. Woe to the worthless shepherd who leaves the flock!
The sword will be on his arm, and on his right eye. His arm will be
completely withered, and his right eye will be totally blinded!’”
Zekharyah (Zechariah) 11:15-17
,‫ כִּי ִהנֵּה אָנֹכִי ֵמקִים רֹעֶה בָּאָרֶץ‬.‫ ְכּלִי רֹעֶה ֱאוִלִי‬,‫ עוֹד קַח ְל ָך‬:‫ ֵאלָי‬,‫וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה‬
‫ְשׂר‬
ַ ‫ וּב‬,‫ לֹא יְַכ ְלכֵּל‬,‫ לֹא יְ ַרפֵּא; ַהנִּ ָצּבָה‬,‫ִשׁ ֶבּרֶת‬
ְ ‫ וְ ַהנּ‬,‫ַהנִּ ְכחָדוֹת לֹא יִפְקֹד ַהנַּעַר לֹא יְַבקֵּשׁ‬
‫ ֶחרֶב עַל זְרוֹעוֹ וְעַל עֵין‬,‫הוֹי רֹעִי ָה ֱאלִיל עֹזְבִי הַצֹּאן‬.‫ וּ ַפ ְרסֵיהֶן יְָפרֵק‬,‫ַה ְבּרִיאָה יֹאכַל‬
.‫ וְעֵין יְמִינוֹ כָּהֹה ִת ְכהֶה‬,‫יְמִינוֹ; זְרֹעוֹ יָבוֹשׁ תִּיבָשׁ‬
This connection that the attributes of the worthless shepherd imply one
who can provide no real protection for the sheep. The arm of the leader
represented “strength for defense” and the right eye was the one used to
see over the shield in aiming his arrow. Thus the people under a foolish
shepherd will be defenseless against the Adversary, against Ha’Satan.
“Once Allaah’s Apostle stood amongst the people, glorified and

praised Allaah as He deserved and then mentioned the Dajjaal
saying, ‘l warn you against him (i.e. the Dajjaal) and there was no
55
prophet but warned his nation against him. No doubt, Noah warned
his nation against him but I tell you about him something of which
no prophet told his nation before me. You should know that he is
one-eyed, and Allaah is not one-eyed.’”
Volume 4, Book 55, Number 553: Narrated Ibn Ùmar
“I harbor fear in regard to you in so many other things besides the

Dajjaal. If he comes forth while I am among you, I shall fight with
him on your behalf, but if he comes forth while I am not among you,
a man must contend on his own behalf and Allaah will take care of
every Muslim on my behalf (and safeguard him against his evil). He
(the Dajjaal) will be a young man with twisted, cropped hair, and a
blind eye. I compare him with Abd’ul-Uzza ibn Qatan. He who
among you will survive to see him should recite over him the
opening verses of Surat’ual-Kahf (Chapter 18). He will appear on
the way between Syria and Iraq and will spread mischief right and
left.”
Book 40, Number 7015: Narrated An-Nawwas ibn Sam’an
As for the description of the true hybrid jinn (jinniy-l-àamar) form of

the Antichrist:
“And again I said: ‘Lord, thereafter what will you do?’ And I heard
a voice saying to me: ‘Hear, righteous John. Then shall appear the
Denier, and he who is set apart in the darkness, who is called
Antichrist.’ And again I said: ‘Lord, reveal to me what he is like.’
And I heard a voice saying to me: ‘The appearance of his face is
dusky; the hairs of his head are sharp, like darts; his eyebrows like a
wild beast’s; his right eye like the star which rises in the morning,
and the other like a lion’s; his mouth about one cubit; his teeth span
long; his fingers like scythes; the print of his feet of two spans; and
on his face an inscription, Antichrist; he shall be exalted even to
heaven, and shall be cast down even to Hades (Sheol), making false
56
displays. And then will I make the heaven brazen, so that it shall not
give moisture upon the Earth; and I will hide the clouds in secret
places, so that they shall not bring moisture upon the Earth; and I
will command the horns of the wind, so that the wind shall not blow
upon the earth.” Revelation of Saint John the Theologian 5-9
57
“Maseehu-d-Dajjaal” (Antichrist) and the Many Dajjaaloon

(Imposters)
The Prophet Muhammad is reported to have said: “The Day of
Judgment will not take place until thirty Dajjaaloon emerge
claiming to be a prophet.”
Aboo Dawood, Sunan, Vol. 2, p.
Àli ibn Abi Taalib said: “Be afraid of the two Dajjaalayn who will be
born of the descendants of Faatimah. A Dajjaal (‘imposter’) will
arise from Dijla at Basra who is not from me. He will be the
forerunner of a number of Dajjaaloon.”
al-Malahim wa al-fitan, p. 113.
In another tradition the Prophet said: “The Day of Judgment will not
commence until thirty liars and Dajjaali persons appear and ascribe
falsehood to God and His Prophet.”
Aboo Dawood, Sunan, Vol 2, p.
In still another tradition the Prophet is reported to have said: “Before

the rise of Dajjaal, more than seventy Dajjaaloon (‘impostors’) will
precede.”
Majma’ al-zawa’id, Vol 7, p. 333.
From all these traditions it appears that ‘Dajjaal’ is not the name of a
specific person. Like the word ‘antichrist’ it is generally applied to any
deceiver, imposter, and fraudulent person. In short, the roots of the story
of Dajjaal must be searched in the Bible and among the Christians.
Thereafter, most of the Hadeeth-reports on the subject, with all of their
details, are to be found in the Sunni and Shi’ite books and were
58
transmitted by their narrators. It is quite possible that the actual events

concerning Dajjaal, as foretold in some traditions, might be true.
However, all the details about his features and character do not have the
stamp of authenticity on them, since the majority of these descriptions,
published in Bihaaru-l-’Anwaar and other books, are reported by
unidentified narrators. For the detailed chain of transmission and the
problem of unknown reporters in that chain see: Bihaaru-l-’Anwaar,
Vol. 52 where the traditions are reported with full documentation made
up of some unidentified narrators.
Consequently, even if it is hypothetically admitted that the actual
instance of the appearance of Dajjaal is authentic, the details that are
provided have certainly been colored by fictitious stories. We can
maintain this much without difficulty: that in the “Last Days” of the Era
of Iblees’ rule, and close to the emergence of the Mahdi, a man will be
found who will be singularly a deceiver and an imposter, surpassing in
wickedness all the previous Dajjaaloon. He will mislead a group by his
nihilistic claims. He will present himself to the people as if he is in
control of their bread and water. People will become so delinquent in
moral discernment that they will begin to believe that the entire universe
is within his control. In his deceitful communication he will introduce
good works as bad and bad as good. He will show Jahannam (Hell) as
Jannatu-l-Firdaus (Heaven), and Jannat’ul-Firdaus as Jahannam. But his
disbelief will be evident to all literate and illiterate persons.
We know from the “Ahlu-l-Bayt” in Bihaaru-l-Anwaar both that
there were historical identifiable “Dajjaaloon” even in that time as well
as the fact that Paul himself had been identified by name in Àrabic as a
Dajjaal of Jesus.
It is reported that Abu Àbdullaah said, "Allaah did not raise a Rasool
without there being two Shaiytanayn concurrent who caused him
suffering and tempted him, and misled the people after him. As for the
five Ulu-l-Àzm (Possessors of Determination), of the Rusul, they are
Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (sal). As for the
companions of Noah, they were Faytifus and Khiram. For Abraham
59
there were Makil and Radham. For Moses, there were Samiri and
Mar'aqiba. For Jesus, there were Buloos and Marisa. And for
Muhammad, there were Habtar and Zuraiq."
Bihar al-Anwar, 13, 212, 5
Additionally, there were ahadeeth stating that the Dajjaal was alive and
well in Muhammad’s day.
'Amir ibn Sharahil Sha'bi Sha'b Hamdan reported that he asked Fatimah
bint Qays, the sister of Dahhak ibn Qays, who was one of the first
Muhajirat, "Tell me a Hadith which you heard directly from the
Prophet with no narrator in between." She said, "I can tell you if
you like." He said, 'Yes, please tell me," she said, "I married Ibn al-
Mughirah, who was one of the best of the youth of Quraysh in those
days. But he fell in the first Jihad on the side of the Prophet.
"When I became a widow, 'Abd al-Rahman ibn 'Awf, one of
the companions of the Prophet sent me a proposal of marriage. The
Prophet also sent me a proposal of marriage on behalf of his
freedman Usamah ibn Zayd. I had been told that the Prophet had
said, 'He who loves me should also love Usamah.' When the Prophet
spoke to me, I said, 'It is up to you: marry me to whomever you
wish.'
"The Prophet said, 'Go and stay with Umm Sharik.' Umm
Sharik was a rich Ansari (Muslim originally from Madinah)
woman, who spent much in the way of Allah and entertained many
guests. I said, 'I will do as you wish.' Then he said, 'Don't go. Umm
Sharik has many guests, and I would not like it if your head or leg
were to become uncovered accidentally and people saw something
you would not wish them to see. It is better if you go and stay with
your cousin 'Abd Allah ibn 'Amr ibn Umm Maktum' (Abd Allah
was of the Banu Fihr of Quraysh, the same tribe as that to which
Fatima belonged).
"So I went to stay with him, and when I had completed my
'Iddah (period of waiting), I heard the Prophet's announer calling
60
for congregational prayer. I went out to the mosque, and prayed

behind the Prophet. I was in the women's row, which was at the
back of the congregation. When the Prophet had finished his prayer,
he sat on the pulpit, smiling, and said, 'Everyone should stay in his
place.' Then he said, 'Do you know why I had asked you to
assemble?' The people said, 'Allah and His Messenger know
best.'
"He said, 'By Allah, I have not gathered you here to give you
an exhortation or a warning. I have kept you here because Tamim
al-Dari, a Christian man who has come and embraced Islam, told
me something which agrees with that which I have told you about
the Dajjaal. He told me that he had sailed in a ship with 30 men
from Banu Lakhm and Banu Judham. The waves had tossed them
about for a month, then they were brought near to an island, at the
time of sunset. They landed on the island, and were met by a beast
who was so hairy that they could not tell its front from its back.
They said, "Woe to you! What are you?" It said, "I am al-
Jassasah." They said, "What is al-Jassasah?" It said, "O people, go
to this man in the monastery, for he is very eager to know about
you." Tamim said that when it named a person to us, we were afraid
lest it be a devil.
"Tamim said, 'We quickly went to the monastery. There we
found a huge man with his hands tied up to his neck and with iron
shackles between his legs up to the ankles. We said, "Woe to you,
who are you?" He said, "You will soon know about me. Tell me who
you are." We said, "We are people from Arabia. We sailed in a ship,
but the waves have been tossing us about for a month, and they
brought us to your island, where we met a beast who was so hairy
that we could not tell its front from its back. We said to it,
"Woe to you! What are you? and it said , "I am al-Jassasah."
We asked, "What is al-Jassasah?" and it told us, "Go to this man in
the monastery, for he is very eager to know about you." So we came
to you quickly, fearinthat it might be a devil.'
61
"The man said, "Tell me about the date-palms of Baysan.' We

said, 'What do you want to know about them?" He said, 'I want to
know whether these trees bear fruit or not.' We said, 'Yes.' He said,
'Soon they will not bear fruit.' Then he said, "Tell me about the lake
of al-Tabariyyah [Tiberias, in Palestine].' We said, 'What do you
want to know about it?" He asked, 'Is there water in it?' We said,
'There is plenty of water in it.' He said, 'Soon it will become dry.'
Then he said, 'Tell me about the spring of Zughar.' We said, 'What
do you want to know about it?' He said, 'Is there water in it, and
does it irrigate the land?" We said, 'Yes, there is plenty of water in
it, and the people use it to irrigate the land.'
"Then he said, "Tell me about the unlettered Prophet ' what
has he done?' We said, 'He has left Mecca and settled in Yathrib.'
He asked, 'Do the Arabs fight against him?' We said, 'Yes.' He said,
'How does he deal with them?' So we told him that the Prophet had
overcome the Arabs around him and that they had followed him. He
asked, 'Has it really happened?' We said, 'Yes.' He said, 'It is better
for them if they follow him. Now I will tell you about myself. I am
the Dajjaal. I will soon be permitted to leave this place: I will
emerge and travel about the earth. In 40 nights I will pass through
every town, except Mecca and Madinah, for these have been
forbidden to me. Every time I try to enter either of them, I will be
met by an angel bearing an unsheathed sword, who will prevent me
from entering. There will be angels guarding them at every passage
leading to them.'
Fatimah said, "The Prophet striking the pulpit with his staff,
said: 'This is Tayyibah, this is Tayyibah, this is Tayyibah, [ie
Madinah]. Have I not told you something like this?' The people said,
'Yes.' He said, 'I liked the account given to me by Tamim because it
agrees with that which I have told you about the Dajjaal, and about
Mecca and Madinah. Indeed he is in the Syrian sea or the Yemen
sea. No, on the contrary, he is in the East, he is in the East, he is in
the East' and he pointed towards the East. Fatimah said: I
memorised this from the Prophet." (recorded in “Saheeh” Muslim).
62
Now how long after the utterance of these eye-witness testimonies, the
Dajjaal remained within such subtereanean catacombs is a matter of
debate and speculation. However, there were accounts of one such
potential figure present in Muhammad’s day and locale.
From Ahmad, and at-Tirmidhi, it is reported: “Aboo Bakrah said, “The
Prophet said, “The Dajjaal’s parents will remain childless for thirty
years, then a one-eyed child will be born to them. He will be very
bad and will cause a great deal of trouble. When he sleeps, his eyes
will be closed but his heart (or mind) will still be active.’ Then he
described his parents: ‘His father will be a tall and thick man, with
a long nose like a beak; his mother will be a huge, heavy-breasted
woman.’ Aboo Bakrah said, “We heard that a child had been born
to some of the Jews in Madina. Al-Zubayr Ibn al-Awam and I went
see his pa, and found that they matched the description given by the
Prophet. We saw the boy lying in the sun, covered with a blanket,
murmuring to himself. We asked his parents about him, and they
said, ‘We remained childless for thirty years, then this one-eyed boy
was born to us. He is very bad and causes a great deal of trouble.
When we went out, we passed the boy. He asked us, ‘What were you
doing?’ We said, ‘Did you hear us?. He said, ‘Yes; when I sleep, my
eyes are closed but my heart (mind) is still active. That boy was Ibn
Sayyad.”
On the surface, these accounts would seem to contradict the Hadeeth of

Tarimu-l-Dari, the island and monastary Hadeeth which seem credible
also because of their direct link with the fulfillment of prophecy in the
book of Revelation. It’s not strong, it indicates a possibility of Ibn
Sayyad having been one eyed from the start. Is it possible that a boy
could have been born to this couple, come to near maturity, been killed
by our suspect and replaced by him in disguise?
In the collection of “Saheeh” Muslim there is an amazing hadeeth
showing that though Ibn Sayyad normally appeared to have two intact
eyes, there was a time when one of them appeared strange; as if there
63
was some method of concealing its true appearance; a method that had
begun to wear off. The swollen nature of Ibn Sayyad’s eye would have
been unusual, or else the narrator wouldn’t have commented upon it.
This seems even more poignent when correlated with the scaly
“blinding” of Paul’s eyes on the road to “Damascus.”
“Nafi’ reported that Ibn ‘Ùmar said: I met lbn Sayyad twice and
said to some of them (his friends): You state that it was he (the
Dajjaal). He said: By Allaah, it is not so. I said: You have not told
me the truth; by Allaah some of you informed me that he would not
die until he would have the largest number of offspring and huge
wealth and it is he about whom it is thought so. Then Ibn Sayyad
talked to us. I then departed and met him again for the second time
and his eye had been swollen. I said: What has happened to your
eye? He said: I do not know. I said: This is in your head and you do
not know about it? He said: If Allaah so wills He can create it (eye)
in your staff. He then produced a sound like the braying of a
donkey. Some of my companions thought that I had struck him with
the staff as he was with me that the staff broke into pieces, but, by
Allaah, I was not conscious of it. He then came to the Mother of the
Faithful (Hafsa) and narrated it to her and she said: What concern
you have with him? Don’t you know that Allaah’s Prophet said that
the first thing (by the incitement of which) he would come out before
the public would be his anger?”
The way that Muhammad continuously repeated that the Antichrist is

blind in the right eye makes it certain that this is a primary indictation of
his identity. That is, if his actions or “fruits” (as Jesus said), are fitting
with the Antichrist nature and descriptions, and if he was blind in the
right eye, then there is a fairly good indication that we might want to
take a hard look at such an individual.
64
“But I will tell you something which no other Prophet has told his
people. You must know that the Dajjaal is one-eyed, and Allaah is
not one-eyed.’”
Nevertheless, Sa’id ibn Sayyad is probably not the “Dajjaal” proper. For,
apart from the weakness in the chain of transmission, Muhammad is
reported to have said this about Dajjaal: “He will not enter the two cities
of Mecca and Medina.” On the contrary Sa’id ibn Sayd had entered
these cities. He died in Medina and some people were witness to his
death.
Bihaaru-l-’Anwaar, Vol. 52, p. 199.
Thus, we must conclude that IF Sa’id ibn Sayyad was in fact the Dajjaal,
then the ahadeeth regarding the Dajjaal not being able to enter Mecca or
Medina must certainly not be true. In either event this is not a conclusion
that we can jump to. Instead we must take both sides with a grain of salt
and consider them both as possibilities.
If it is hypothetically accepted that the Prophet Muhammad did
name Sa’id as Dajjaal, he must have used the word in its common
meaning as a ‘deceiver’ and a ‘liar’ rather than as the Dajjaal who is part
of the signs of the appearance of the Mahdi. In other words, when the
Prophet met Sa’id he introduced him as a personification of an antichrist
to his companions. Following that, when he informed the people about
the emergence of Dajjaal in the Final Days, those who heard him
thought the reference was being made to Sa’id ibn Sayd whom he had
called a Dajjaal, and it is this Dajjaal who would appear as one of the
signs of the Last Days, akhiru-l-Zamaan. The tradition about Dajjaal
being alive and possessing a long age comes from this incident.
“We were talking about Hajjatu-l-Wada, while the Prophet was

amongst us. We did not know what Hajjat’ul-Wada’ signified. The
Prophet praised Allaah and then mentioned Al-Maseehu-d-Dajjaal
and described him extensively, saying, “Allaah did not send any
65
prophet but that prophet warned his nation of Al-Maseehu-d-

Dajjaal. Noah and the prophets following him warned (their people)
of him. He will appear amongst you (O Muhammad’s followers),
and if it happens that some of his qualities may be hidden from you,
but your Lord’s State is clear to you and not hidden from you. The
Prophet said it thrice. Verily, your Lord is not blind in one eye,
while he (i.e. Ad-Dajjaal) is blind in the right eye which looks like a
grape bulging out (of its cluster). No doubt,! Allaah has made your
blood and your properties sacred to one another like the sanctity of
this day of yours, in this town of yours, in this month of yours.” The
Prophet added: No doubt! Haven’t I conveyed Allaah’s Message to
you?” They replied, “Yes,” The Prophet said thrice, “O Allaah! Be
witness for it.” The Prophet added, “Woe to you!” (or said), “May
Allaah be merciful to you! Do not become infidels after me (i.e. my
death) by cutting the necks (throats) of one another.”
Narrated by Ibn Ùmar Hadeeth 5.685 (Saheeh Bukhari Hadeeth)
Herein we are warned of the Antichrist not only rising, but actually
infiltrating the Ummah, the body of Muslims, in these last days of this
Age, in the same way that he did 2,000 years ago in the P’rushim or
Pharisees as the so-called “Sha’ul Ha’Tarsu.” Moreover, Muhammad
warned us that this Imposter would turn the Muslims against one another
as is so prevalent today with Wahhabi’s and the Taliban literally
massacring Muslims from little children, to the elderly in there very
places of worship.
Muhammad warns of this saying: “May Allaah be merciful to you! Do
not become infidels after me (i.e. my death) by cutting the necks
(throats) of one another.”
So the implication is clearly that the Antichrist would infiltrate the

Ummah in his final manifestation. He would turn Muslims against one
another just as the Taliban have done and are doing today.
Again Muhammad warned: “He will appear amongst you - and if it
happens that some of his qualities may be hidden from you - but
66
your Lord’s State is clear to you and not hidden from you.” That is,
this Imposter will appear amongst the Ummah, yet it would happen that
some of his qualities may be hidden. That is, like his persona as “Sha’ul
Ha’Tarsu” infiltrating the P’rushim, he will conceal his true beliefs and
practices.
Whether or not “Sha’ul” was “converted” to following Jesus, he
would not suddenly preach things that were entirely contrary to the
P’rushim. That is, he would not now believe in such concepts of Gnostic
paganism which Paul was famous for, including the “Trinity,” god in
human flesh, the Eucharist; the eating of the flesh of a god, and the
drinking of blood, as well as the abrogation of the Torah and Mitzvot.
In reality, all the while that Paul was infiltrating the P’rushim, he
was pretending to be an ultra-orthodox zealot, when in fact his true
theology was concealed from all. This is what Muhammad in fact is
warning us of; that though he may conceal some of these traits, he will
still be blind in the right eye. The Prophet Muhammad said it thrice, in
regards to how we will identify him if he conceals his Satanic qualities:
“Verily, your Lord is not blind in one eye, while he is blind in the
right eye which looks like a grape bulging out.”
This hadeeth is quite interesting in light of the hadeeth related to Ibn

Sayyad; which speaks of a “swollen” nature to his eye. But regardless of
the various historical manifestations of the Dajjaal, the Ummah must ask
itself, who is there among us who is blind in the right eye, who “walks
with one sandal” as “the Shaiytan walks with one sandal” as
Muhammad warned us? Who is there who is taking on the identical role
of Sha’ul Ha’Tarsu in his infiltration of the P’rushim? What is the
modern day equivalent of the P’rushim, the Pharisees and who has
appointed himself as the “Àmeer” of such a sect? Who, in so doing, has
turned Muslims against one another, “cutting each others throats?”
Who has risen from the East of the Hijaaz, whereas Muhammad said the
“Sun will Rise in the West?” Who claims to be from a large family, yet
only his “mother” is alive with him, whilst all of his supposed “large
family” are claimed to have died when he was 6 or younger? Who
67
emerged when claiming to be between 30 and 40 years of age? Who was

shot 31 times with high velocity rifle rounds, and lives on to this day?
Who did the Pentagon pass on falty information saying he had many
children which Bin Ladin intermarried with, whilst the Al-Qa’ida
network declared that there was no intermarriage between any children
of this individual and Ùsama Bin Ladin? Who did the United States
have in their sites when they began their so-called “War on Terrorism”
but allowed him to drive away due to lack of authorization? Who
survived the attack on Afghani civilians and Tora Bora? Who wears a
black turban, claiming to be a descendant of Muhammad, while no one
has any record of his family’s ancestry? Who unraveled a black banner
that Muhammad himself used in war, in order for this individual to
falsely align himself with prophecies of the coming “Imaamu-l-Mahdi”
(The Rightly Guided Leader), who is the “Elijah” prophesied in the
Book of Malachi, and even in the canonical Gospels when Jesus said
that Elijah had come (archetypally as John the Baptist), but that on the
other hand Elijah was still to come in the future (archetypally as
Imaamu-l-Mahdi)? Whose followers are now actually claiming that he is
the Mahdi?
There is only one such individual who fits the profile…
“You (Satan) may entice them with your voice, and mobilize all your
forces and all your men against them, and share in their money and
children, and promise them. Anything Iblees (the Devil) promises is
no more than an illusion. Al-Qur’aan, Soorah 17:64
‫ﺳ َﺘ ْﻔ ِﺰ ْز‬
ْ ‫ﻦ وَا‬
ِ ‫ﺖ َﻣ‬
َ ‫ﻄ ْﻌ‬
َ ‫ﺳ َﺘ‬
ْ ‫ﻚ ِﻣ ْﻨ ُﻬ ْﻢ ا‬
َ ‫ﺼ ْﻮ ِﺗ‬
َ ‫ﺐ ِﺑ‬
ْ ‫ﺟِﻠ‬
ْ ‫ﻚ ﻋَﻠَ ْﻴﻬِﻢ َوَأ‬
َ ‫ﺨ ْﻴِﻠ‬
َ ‫ﻚ ِﺑ‬
َ ‫ﺟِﻠ‬
ِ ‫ل ﻓِﻲ َوﺷَﺎ ِر ْآ ُﻬ ْﻢ َو َر‬ ِ ‫ﻷ ْﻣﻮَا‬
َ‫ا‬
‫ﻷوْﻻ ِد‬
َ ‫ﻋ ْﺪ ُه ْﻢ وَا‬
ِ ‫ن َﻳ ِﻌ ُﺪ ُه ُﻢ وَﻣَﺎ َو‬ُ ‫ﺸ ْﻴﻄَﺎ‬
‫ﻻ اﻟ ﱠ‬
‫ﻏﺮُورًا ِإ ﱠ‬ ُ
68
Killing In True Islaam

To the mubtadah, the inventor of man-made religion, who believes that
it is permissible to kill those who practice ALL of the Fara’id - who bear
witness to God as One, with absolutely no partners nor equals; who bear
witness to the prophethood of Muhammad, the Seal of the Prophets; who
believe in the Divine Wahy (Revelation), of the Qur’aan; who believe in
the Prophets; who believe in Al-Ghayb, the Hidden; who believe in the
Malaa’ikah or Angels; the reckoning on the Yawmu-d-Deen; who
believe in and practice Salaah (in some cases practicing 51 raka’at
daily); who give Zakaah; who fast in the daylight hours of the month of
Ramadhan, and then often on other days as well; who believe in making
Hajj when kaafir regimes do not attempt to prevent us from doing so - to
such mubtadiìn Ashura was a day for them to unfurl the banner of their
bida’a (creation of man-made religion), fisq (hypocracy) and kufr
(denial of truth). For the mubtadiìn it was an occasion to yet again
violate the Qur’aanic Commandment that says: “Never should a
believer kill a believer” (‫ﻞ ُﻣ ْﺆ ِﻣﻨًﺎ‬
َ ‫ﻦ أَن َﻳ ْﻘ ُﺘ‬
ٍ ‫ن ِﻟ ُﻤ ْﺆ ِﻣ‬
َ ‫) وَﻣَﺎ آَﺎ‬.
The Qur’aan continues in the following Soorah of An-Nisa’ 93:
“And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his punishment is
Jahannam; he shall abide in it, and Allaah will send His wrath on
him and curse him and prepare for him a painful chastisement.”
‫ﻞ َوﻣَﻦ‬
ْ ‫ﺠﺰَﺁ ُؤ ُﻩ ﱡﻣ َﺘ َﻌ ﱢﻤﺪًا ُﻣ ْﺆ ِﻣﻨًﺎ َﻳ ْﻘ ُﺘ‬
َ ‫ﺟ َﻬ ﱠﻨ ُﻢ َﻓ‬
َ ‫ﺐ ﻓِﻴﻬَﺎ ﺧَﺎﻟِﺪًا‬
َ ‫ﻀ‬
ِ ‫ﻏ‬
َ ‫ﻋَﻠ ْﻴ ِﻪ اﻟﻠّ ُﻪ َو‬
َ ‫ﻋ ﱠﺪ َوَﻟ َﻌ َﻨ ُﻪ‬
َ ‫ﻋﺬَاﺑًﺎ َﻟ ُﻪ َوَأ‬
َ
‫ﻋﻈِﻴﻤًﺎ‬ َ
However, mubtadi’in being of their natures, they will speak their words
of bida’a, fisq and kufr and will claim that we who practice ALL of the
Fara’id, the Furood, who bear Witness to the Absolute Oneness of God
and the Prophethood of the Seal of Prophets are in their warped minds
NOT Muslims, and in fact kuffar (deniers of truth). Accordingly, they
view their acts of terrorism and murder as “jihaad” when in fact they are
the furthest thing from mujahidoon, and not one of them has the true
character of a mujahid.
69
However, it is not enough to pronounce takfeer on them, for none

should follow in their footsteps as baseless slanderers. Jesus Christ said
that you will know a tree by its fruits. You will know the nature of an
individual by their actions.
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but

inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits.
Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? So, every
sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit. A
sound tree cannot bear evil fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good
fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and
thrown into the fire. Thus you will know them by their fruits.”
Matthew 7:15-20
προσεχετε απο των ψευδοπροφητων, οιτινες ερχονται προς υμας ε

ν ενδυμασιν προβατων, εσωθεν δε εισιν λυκοι αρπαγες. απο των κ
αρπων αυτων επιγνωσεσθε αυτους: μητι συλλεγουσιν απο ακανθ
ων σταφυλας η απο τριβολων συκα; ουτως παν δενδρον αγαθον κ
αρπους καλους ποιει, το δε σαπρον δενδρον καρπους πονηρους π
οιει: ου δυναται δενδρον αγαθον καρπους πονηρους ποιειν, ουδε
δενδρον σαπρον καρπους καλους ποιειν. παν δενδρον μη ποιουν
καρπον καλον εκκοπτεται και εις πυρ βαλλεται. αρα γε απο των κ
αρπων αυτων επιγνωσεσθε αυτους.
Muhammad has said: “If somebody accuses another of Fusuq (by

calling him ‘Fasiq’ i.e. a wicked person) or accuses him of Kufr,
such an accusation will revert to him (i.e. the accuser) if his
companion (the accused) is innocent.”
Saheehu-l-Bukhari, Volume 8 Hadeeth number 71
In addition to this we also read that: “Ibn Ùmar related that the Holy
Prophet said: ‘If a Muslim calls another Kaafir, then if he is a
Kaafir let it be so; otherwise, he [the caller] is himself a Kaafir.’’’
70
Aboo Dawood, Book of Sunnah, edition published by Qur’aan Mahal,

Karachi, vol. iii, p. 484
So we KNOW for a matter of fact, from the very actions, the “fruit” of
these kuffar, that they are kuffar because they have pronounced takfeer
on those who are innocent of such allegations of kufr, and they have
declared their blood halaal and carried out acts of MURDER against
them. As such, these kuffar are not only outside of the fold of Islaam,
they have become oppressors and MUST be fought against in self-
defense. The Qur’aan says in Al-Baqarah, 190 and 191:
“And fight in the way of Allaah with those who fight with you, and
do not exceed the limits, surely Allaah does not love those who
exceed the limits. And kill them wherever you find them, and drive
them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is worse
than bloodshed, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Masjid
until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay
them; such is the recompense of the kaafireen.”
‫ﻞ ﻓِﻲ َوﻗَﺎ ِﺗﻠُﻮ ْا‬ ِ ‫ﺳﺒِﻴ‬

َ ِ‫ﻦ اﻟﻠّﻪ‬َ ‫ﻻ ُﻳﻘَﺎ ِﺗﻠُﻮ َﻧ ُﻜ ْﻢ اﱠﻟﺬِﻳ‬
َ ‫ن َﺗ ْﻌ َﺘﺪُو ْا َو‬ ‫ﻻ اﻟﻠّﻪَ ِإ ﱠ‬َ ‫ﺤﺐﱢ‬ ِ ‫ﻦ ُﻳ‬َ ‫ﺚ وَا ْﻗ ُﺘﻠُﻮ ُه ْﻢ ا ْﻟ ُﻤ ْﻌ َﺘﺪِﻳ‬ ُ ‫ﺣ ْﻴ‬
َ
‫ﺧ ِﺮﺟُﻮهُﻢ ﺛَﻘِ ْﻔ ُﺘﻤُﻮ ُه ْﻢ‬ْ ‫ﻦ َوَأ‬
ْ ‫ﺚ ﱢﻣ‬ ُ ‫ﺣ ْﻴ‬َ ‫ﺧ َﺮﺟُﻮ ُآ ْﻢ‬ ْ ‫ﺷ ﱡﺪ وَا ْﻟ ِﻔ ْﺘ َﻨ ُﺔ َأ‬
َ ‫ﻦ َأ‬
َ ‫ﻞ ِﻣ‬
ِ ‫ﻻ ا ْﻟ َﻘ ْﺘ‬َ ‫ﻋﻨ َﺪ ُﺗﻘَﺎ ِﺗﻠُﻮ ُه ْﻢ َو‬ ِ ‫ﺠ ِﺪ‬ ِ‫ﺴ‬ ْ ‫ا ْﻟ َﻤ‬
‫ﺤﺮَا ِم‬
َ ‫ﺣﺘﱠﻰ ا ْﻟ‬ َ ‫ﻚ ﻓَﺎ ْﻗ ُﺘﻠُﻮ ُه ْﻢ ﻗَﺎ َﺗﻠُﻮ ُآ ْﻢ َﻓﺈِن ﻓِﻴ ِﻪ ُﻳﻘَﺎ ِﺗﻠُﻮ ُآ ْﻢ‬ َ ‫ﺟﺰَاء َآ َﺬِﻟ‬ َ ‫ﻦ‬ َ ‫ا ْﻟﻜَﺎ ِﻓﺮِﻳ‬
The Qur’aan could not be more clear. Oppression is worse than

bloodshed. When we are fought against with violent oppression we must
fight back violently. While we did not throw the first punch or fire the
first shot, we MUST throw and fire the LAST one. When these kuffar
have transgressed the limits in fighting against us - targeting non-
combatants and civilians - we must fight these kuffar but never approach
their kaafir methods of IMPOSTER “jihaad.”
Again, we are told in Aayah 190 “do not exceed the limits.” But
just what are these limits? The instructions of Rasool’ullaah are as
follows:
71
“Do not kill any old person, any child or any woman” (Aboo
Dawood). “Do not kill the monks in monasteries” or “Do not kill the
people who are sitting in places of worship” (Musnad of Ibn
Hanbal).
This is EXACTLY what the “Taliban” and the so-called “Àmeeru-l-

Mu’minoon” have done! During a war, Muhammad saw the corpse of a
woman lying on the ground and observed: “She was not fighting. How
then she came to be killed?”
How then can these people kill unarmed individuals who have not killed
or injured any innocents? It is written in Sooratu-l-Maaida, 32
“For this reason did We prescribe to the Children of Israel that

whoever slays a soul, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in
the land, it is as though he slew all men; and whoever keeps it alive,
it is as though he kept alive all men; and certainly Our Rusul came
to them with clear arguments, but even after that many of them
certainly act extravagantly in the land.”
‫ﻦ‬
ْ ‫ﻞ ِﻣ‬ ِ‫ﺟ‬ْ ‫ﻚ َأ‬ َ ‫ﺳﺮَاﺋِﻴﻞَ َﺑﻨِﻲ ﻋَﻠَﻰ آَﺘَ ْﺒﻨَﺎ َذِﻟ‬ ْ ِ‫ﻞ ﻣَﻦ َأﻧﱠ ُﻪ إ‬ َ ‫ﺲ ِﺑ َﻐ ْﻴ ِﺮ َﻧ ْﻔﺴًﺎ َﻗ َﺘ‬
ٍ ‫ض ﻓِﻲ َﻓﺴَﺎ ٍد َأ ْو َﻧ ْﻔ‬ ِ ‫ﻷ ْر‬ َ‫ا‬
‫ﻞ َﻓ َﻜَﺄ ﱠﻧﻤَﺎ‬
َ ‫س َﻗ َﺘ‬
َ ‫ﺟﻤِﻴﻌًﺎ اﻟﻨﱠﺎ‬ َ ‫ﻦ‬ْ ‫ﺣﻴَﺎهَﺎ َو َﻣ‬
ْ ‫ﺣﻴَﺎ ﻓَﻜَﺄَ ﱠﻧﻤَﺎ َأ‬
ْ َ‫س أ‬َ ‫ﺟﻤِﻴﻌًﺎ اﻟﻨﱠﺎ‬ َ ‫ﺳُﻠﻨَﺎ ﺟَﺎء ْﺗ ُﻬ ْﻢ َوَﻟ َﻘ ْﺪ‬ُ ‫ت ُر‬ِ ‫ﺑِﺎﻟﺒَﻴﱢﻨَﺎ‬
‫ن ُﺛﻢﱠ‬
‫ﻚ َﺑ ْﻌ َﺪ ﱢﻣ ْﻨﻬُﻢ َآﺜِﻴﺮًا ِإ ﱠ‬ َ ‫ض ﻓِﻲ َذِﻟ‬ ِ ‫ﻷ ْر‬ َ‫نا‬ َ ‫ﺴ ِﺮﻓُﻮ‬ْ ‫َﻟ ُﻤ‬
72
Words of the so-called “Mullah”

Before delving into an investigation into the background of this
individual calling himself “Àmeeru-l-Mu’minoon” (Commander of the
Faithful, a term designated for the LEADER of the Ummah itself), let us
examine some of the individual’s own words from various interviews.
The title, and cover of this book are putting forth some pretty bold
claims. It is not being expressed that “perhaps” the so-called “Mullah”
Ùmar is the Antichrist, the “Maseehu-d-Dajjaal” of Islaamic prophecy,
it is out rightly being stated that he is. As such, it is only natural for
those who have not delved into the matter deeply to recoil from such a
seemingly arrogantly assured claim (as can be seen from some of the
letters included in the preface). So let’s consider a few things:
• “Mullah” Muhammad Ùmar is blind in the right eye, perhaps the

most key attribute of the “Dajjaal” according to Muhammad.
• In spite of claims of having children, there is not one single child
of this man that has been met by anyone, nor that can be found by
the media nor Western forces in Afghanistan. Why is this?
• The media claimed that Ùsama Bin Ladin had married one of
Ùmar’s children. Al-Qa’ida later denied this (as we will see), and
stated that “all of Ùsama bin Ladin’ wives are Àrab.”
• The fact that there is an obvious deceptiveness being perpetrated
regarding these invisible children of Ùmar’s would seem quite
suspect due to the myriad of Islaamic descriptions of the Dajjaal as
being impotent. It is important to note that this was not a claim that
the Antichrist “could not get it up,” as that would only be known to
himself and to women he tried in vain to have sex with (were that
the case). Certainly in the modern age that definition of impotence
would have correctable with a bottle of Viagra. Instead, this was a
claim that the individual would not be physically capable of sexual
reproduction. For those who have read another book I authored,
“Biogenesis,” it may be clear as to why this is.
73
• “Mullah” Ùmar was shot 31 times according to the now defunct

“Taliban Online’s” bio of him. He was not shot with tiny .22
caliber rounds (which would be a feat of survival in its own right).
He was shot with an AK-47; 7.62 x 39 rifle rounds. That is a .308
caliber round; the same caliber in a shorter casing as the “One shot,
one kill” sniper round used by U.S. Military and Police. Why is it
that this caliber almost always causes a fatality with a small
number of shots, and yet we are being told that this man was shot
over two and half dozen times with the same round and walked out
of the hospital within less than a week?
• For those who remember the invasion following the surreal post-
911 days, recall that a U.S. Air Force pilot had Ùmar in his sights
and requested permission to fire. He was denied this permission
and Ùmar was allowed to escape. This was reported on all of the
mainstream news channels, but was quickly disappeared from
news archives.
Certainly there is much more evidence than the afforementioned alone.

However, these are important things to bear in mind as we examine an
interview with the BBC. In it, the Taliban leader vowed to destroy the
U.S. and said that a decepitive plan was being implemented to achieve
this goal. The interview was conducted via satellite telephone from
Kandahar.
Following are excerpts of the interview:
BBC: What do you think of the current situation in Afghanistan?
Omar: You (the BBC) and American puppet radios have created concern.
But the current situation in Afghanistan is related to a bigger cause - that is
the destruction of America...
BBC: What do you mean by the destruction of America? Do you have a

concrete plan to implement this?
Omar: The plan is going ahead and, God willing, it is being implemented.
74
But it is a huge task, which is beyond the will and comprehension of human
beings. If God’s help is with us, this will happen within a short period of
time; keep in mind this prediction.
BBC: Ùsama Bin Laden has reportedly threatened that he would use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against America. Is your threat
related to his?
Omar: This is not a matter of weapons. We are hopeful for God’s help. The
real matter is the extinction of America. And, God willing, it (America) will
fall to the ground.
BBC: During the past few days, you have lost control of several provinces.
Are you hopeful to regain the lost territory?
Omar: We are hopeful that you will see the same kind of change that you
saw (losing and regaining territory).
BBC: What was the reason for the fast retreat? Why have your troops fled
the cities? Is it because you suffered heavily from the U.S. bombings or have
your soldiers betrayed you?
Omar: I told you that it is related to the larger task....
BBC: Can you tell us which provinces are under your control at the
moment?
Omar: We have four-five provinces. But it is not important how many

provinces we have under our control. Once we did not have a single
province, and then the time came when we had all the provinces, which we
have lost in a week. So the numbers of the provinces are not important.
BBC: As your participation in the future government has already been ruled
out - if some of your forces decide to join the future government as
representatives of the Taliban in general or to moderate Taliban, will you
oppose it?
Omar: “There is no such thing in the Taliban. All Taliban are moderate.
There are two things: extremism (“ifraat”, or doing something to excess)
75
and conservatism (“tafreet”, or doing something insufficiently). So in that

sense, we are all moderates - taking the middle path. The struggle for a
broad-based government has been going on for the last 20 years, but
nothing came of it. We will not accept a government of wrong-doers. We
prefer death than to be a part of an evil government. I tell you, keep this in
mind. This is my prediction. You believe it or not - it’s up to you. But we will
have to wait and see.”
For the rhetorist who views all things Western as “bad” and all things
Eastern as good and Enlightened, it would seem that Ùmar has
exhonorated himself with Anti-American claims. For most Conspiracy
Theorists there are “good” and “evil” parties who stay on either side of
an imaginary line. On one side is this nation and on the other is that. It
has been viewed this way from time immemorial. It was viewed this way
in Judea 2,200 years to 1,900 years ago. It has been viewed that way in
the more modern Cold War Era, where on one side was America and the
other the Communists. To most Americans the U.S. was absolutely
right, absolutely the embodiment of good and the communists were
everything bad. To the activists and often self-proclaimed
“revolutionaries” of the day, it was the other way around. The Black
Panthers championed the same rights that the Maoists which they
supported denied to the Chinese people.
Still today it seems a frighteningly over-simplistic view of current
events still pervades the minds of the general population. You essentially
have two “sides,” one viewing the West as being in the right and the
other viewing the Middle East as being in the right. This is much like the
Palestinian suicide bomber who can only see the destruction and land-
grab of Israeli actions against their people and the Israeli who can only
see the targetting of school buses and pizza parlors by the Palestinian
suicide bombers (in turn both side fueling the violence of the other). Few
look at the Palestinian and Israeli situation as having anything to do with
forces bigger than those two parties. People do not generally look at
what events might have orchastrated that conflict, and for what ultimate
goal. Those same people will look at the words of Ùmar and see
someone who is on the side of an extremist version of Anti-American
76
Islaam, rather than seeing someone who has used Islaamic Extremism as
a vehicle for accomplishing goals far bigger than those of Wahhabism
and radical Deobandism.
War against US has only started, says Mulla Omar
RIYADH, May 17: Taliban leader Mulla Omar, in an interview carried in

the Arabic daily Sharq Al-Awsat, has warned that his war with the United
States has only started and its flames would engulf the White House.
In the interview Mulla Omar said Osama Bin Laden is alive. Referring to the
Sept 11 events, he said, “the great actions” were significant historical events,
which achieved their ends. These will be repeated if the United States does
not remove their causes, Omar said. He also asked the Palestinians to
continue their struggle.
This was Mulla Omar’s first interview with a journalist for over two years.
Sharq Al-Awsat reporter met Omar’s special information adviser after an
appointment. The reporter was asked to hand over a questionnaire. This was
translated into Pushto and taken to Mulla Omar. His answers were translated
back into Arabic and handed over to the reporter.
The Taliban leader said his organization did not believe the war had ended in
Afghanistan, or in Palestine or in any other Muslim country for that matter.
As for the war in Afghanistan he said, “I can say that the war has just
started, its fires have been kindled.
That fire will reach the White House because it is the seat of all injustice and
oppression and where they launched a war against Islaam without any
legitimate reason. When the killing of the oppressed people increased in
number we decided to withdraw from the land and start the phase of guerilla
war in the mountains, so that the lives of the people and the poor
Mujahideen may be spared,” he said.
Omar said those who carried out the attacks in the United States had a clear
objective. “What is important for the US now to find out why they did that.
America should remove the cause that made them do it.”
77
In the above, post-911 interview, we see Ùmar almost stereotypically

giving voice to the concerns of the Ummah; so as to be viewed as the
“champion” of the Ummah’s plight. Additionally revealing is Ùmar’s
explanation for the quick withdrawl to the mountains as a tactic of
planned Guerilla Warfare. In short, the Taliban was not overthrown, they
withdrew intentionally as a matter of strategy (or “strategery,” if you
wish). Notice some key passages of the BBC interview. He says that:
The current situation in Afghanistan is related to a bigger cause - that is the

destruction of America..
What could he mean by this? It is clear that he was saying that America was
goaded into Afghanistan for reasons that HE envisioned, but America did not.
Consider also the following passage again:
BBC: What was the reason for the fast retreat? Why have your troops fled
the cities? Is it because you suffered heavily from the U.S. bombings or have
your soldiers betrayed you?
Omar: I told you that it is related to the larger task....
We know now, from more recent news reports, that the Taliban is in fact stronger
than ever in Afghanistan. The Western media has no reason to lie about this. In
fact, it only serves to humiliate the West and the War efforts over-seas. In spite of
the invasion and the Karzai government, the Taliban are stronger when they had
overt control as acting governers of Afghanistan. This does not come as a surprise
to me, as I have been saying that this would happen from the days when George
W. Bush was beginning to pitch an Afghani invasion to the American people.
Voice of America: Interview With Taliban Leader, Mullah Muhammad

Ùmar
WASHINGTON, Sept 24 (IslaamOnline & News Agencies) - The U.S. State

Department pressured the radio channel Voice of America into not airing an
interview it conducted with Taliban spiritual leader Mullah Mohammed
Omar.
http://www.oureffort2001.com/RESEARCH/TALIBAN/Mulla%20omars%20inte
rview%20with%20VofA.htm
78
Voice of America: Why don’t you expel Osama bin Laden?
Omar: This is not an issue of Osama bin Laden. It is an issue of Islaam.

Islaam’s prestige is at stake. So is Afghan’s tradition.
Voice of America: Do you know that the U.S. has announced a war on
terrorism?
Omar: I am considering two promises. One is the promise of God. The other
is that of Bush. The promise of God is that my land is vast. If you start a
journey on God’s path, you can reside anywhere on this earth and will be
protected. . . .The promise of Bush is that there is no place on earth where
you can hide that I cannot find you. We will see which one of these two
promises is fulfilled.
Voice of America: But aren’t you afraid for the people, yourself, the
Taliban, your country?
Omar: Almighty God. . . .is helping the believers and the Muslims. God says
he will never be satisfied with the infidels. In terms of worldly affairs,
America is very strong. Even if it were twice as strong or twice that, it could
not be strong enough to defeat us. We are confident that no one can harm us
if God is with us.
Voice of America: You are telling me you are not concerned, but Afghans
all over the world are concerned.
Omar: We are also concerned. Great issues lie ahead. But we depend on
God’s mercy. This may appear to be a moment of certainty for us, but God’s
mercy is with the Muslims. Consider our point of view: If we give Osama
away today, Muslims who are now pleading to give him up would then be
reviling us for giving him up... . . The very same people would be asking:
Why did you sacrifice the prestige of Islaam? Why did you bring shame on
Muslims? Everyone is afraid of America and wants to please it. But let me
tell you something. Americans will not be able to prevent such acts like the
one that has just occurred because America has taken Islaam hostage.
America has done that in the Islaamic world and especially in the Islaamic
countries.
79
If you look at Islaamic countries, the people are in despair. They are
complaining that Islaam is gone. Secular law has replaced Islaamic law. But
people remain firm in their Islaamic beliefs. In their pain and frustration,
some of them commit suicide acts. They feel they have nothing to lose.
If the U.S. really wants to end this evil, it knows how to do it. It should
end its virtual grip on Islaam. It should let go. Then it would be relieved
forever and the rest of the world can go about its business.
Voice of America: What do you mean by saying America has taken the
Islaamic world hostage?
Omar: America controls the governments of the Islaamic countries. America

keeps after them until they do its bidding, but they are very distant from their
own people. The people ask to follow Islaam, but the governments do not
listen. The people are powerless against their governments because they are
in the grip of the United States. In that way, they become corrupt and ignore
the people.
If someone follows the path of Islaam, the government arrests him,
tortures him or kills him. This is the doing of America. If it stops supporting
those governments and lets the people deal with them, then such things
won’t happen.
America has created the evil that is attacking it. The evil will not
disappear even if I die and Osama dies and others die. This is U.S. policy.
The U.S. should step back and review its policy. It should stop trying to
impose its empire on the rest of the world, especially on Islaamic countries.
In the name of humanitarian aid, Americans brought thousands of
bibles to Afghanistan and were propagating Christianity. If they dare do that
here, can you imagine what they have been doing in Arab countries? The
Muslims understand that. They also know they can’t do anything about it. . .
.so they kill themselves in suicide attacks. They no longer want life on this
earth.
Voice of America: So it means you are not giving Osama bin Laden to the
U.S.?
Omar: No. We cannot do that. If we did, it means we are not Muslims. .

..That Islaam is finished. If we were afraid of attack, we could have
surrendered him the last time we were threatened and attacked, so America
can hit us again, and this time we don’t even have a friend.
80
Voice of America: If you fight America with all your might, can the Taliban
do that? Won’t America beat you and won’t your people suffer even more?
Omar: On the surface it looks as if that is the case, but I’m very confident
that it won’t turn out this way. Please note this: There is nothing more we
can do except depend on Almighty God. If a person really depends on God,
then he is assured that the Almighty will help him, have mercy on him and he
will succeed.
81
Alleged Family Background

This individual who refers to himself, and is referred to by his
“Taliban,” as “Ameeru-l-Mu’mineen Mullah Muhammad Ùmar
Mujahid” is reported to belong respected family of religious scholars.
The only problem is he has no family that can be found anywhere. Their
absence is explained by claiming that they all died when he was very
young except for a woman referred to as his mother.
Interestingly, we see several suspect individuals throughout history
who all fit the description of the prophesied Dajjaal. Strangely, the only
“family” member who these individuals are witnessed with is a woman,
known as Al-Jasassah in Islaamic Ahadeeth, or Jezabel in Biblical
canon. Time and time again when the Dajjaal manifested, it was with
this woman; referred to as the “Whore of Babylon” in ancient
manuscripts. The Book of Revelation speaks of this ancient villianess as
though she were still alive 2,000 years ago, even though she – like
Bil’am ben Be’or, was said to have lived thousands of years before, as
recorded in the Torah. However, even within the Torah they are not the
only such people with strangely large gaps in time between their
mentioning. The Torah’s “King Of of Bashan” is nonchalantly
mentioned in the Torah at intervals of hundreds of years; well beyond
the passage of time from the patriarchs and their exceedingly long life-
spans. Again, for readers of “Biogenesis” this will come as no surprise at
all.
“Unto the Messenger of the community in Thyatira write, ‘These

things says the Son of God who has his eyes like unto a flame of fire,
and his feet are like fine brass. ’i know your works - your charity,
service, faith, and patience - and the last of your works to be more
than the first. Notwithstanding, I have a few things against you
because you deal with that woman Jezebel who calls herself a
prophetess to teach and to seduce my servants to commit
fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. I gave her time to
repent of her fornication, but she repented not.” Revelation 2:18-21
82
Two main points are being made here. One is that Jezabel of the Tanakh
was considered alive and well 2,000 years ago by John, the disciple of
Jesus Christ. Secondly, she had been given a chance to repent of her
deception and whoredom, yet she did not. The phrase “I gave her time to
repent” is indicating that this is the same notorious Jezabel known
throughout Judaism, and subsequently Christianity. Like the Antichrist,
she is kept alive indefinitely by some means that we can only speculate
on.
“Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery
with her into great tribulation except they repent of their deeds. I
will kill her children with death, and all the churches shall know
that I am he who searches the reins and hearts. I will give unto every
one of you according to your works.” Revelation 2:22-23
Unlike the theology of Paul, there is no mention of “Salvation by faith

alone” that Paul’s “Epistles” propagandized. Yet we are told that these
are the very words of Jesus yet this book does not contain one parallel
teaching to those of the Apostate Paul. We are told that he “will give
unto every one of you according to your works.” This is entirely in line
with both the teachings of Jesus Christ in the Gospels – that we know a
man by his fruits – and additionally the theology delineated in the
canonical Book of James, Jesus’ own brother.
In addition to many of the suspect features of the so-called
“Mullah,” and the strange woman who seems to accompany his every
emergence, are the glaring contradictions in his professed biographical
details.
“Muhammad Ùmar Mujahid bin Maulwi Ghulam Nabi Akhwand
bin Mulla Muhammad Rasool Akhwand bin Mulla Muhammad Ayaz
Akhwand” is said to belong to a “branch” of the Hootak tribe, which has
been living in Kandahar for only about a hundred years. ”Mullah”
Muhammad Ùmar was said to have been born in 1960 in the “Noori”
village in Kandahar Province. Kandahar used to be the capital of the
83
Indo-Subcontinent when it was justly ruled by the Afghan conqueror,

Ahmad Shah Abdali.
We are told that Ùmar’s family has produced religious scholars in
every generation, who have rendered countless services to Islaam for
centuries. Ùmar’s invented father “Maulwai Ghulam Nabi Akhwand,”
was claimed to have been a religious scholar and the Imaam at a mosque
in Noori.
Almost all of his claimed predecessors have been religious
scholars, rendering religious services in the southern provinces of
Kandahar, Zabool and Uruzgan. Of course, this makes for great
propaganda; pitching Ùmar almost as a leader born with a genetic
destiny. Talibanist propaganda climas that the people of Afghanistan
have consulted Ùmar’s elders for centuries; seeking guidance on
religious, economical and social issues. Yet, in contradiction to this
claim, at the same time we are told by those same Taliban propagandists,
that they have only been known in Khandar in this past century. How
then could this be?
Would it not then be possible that such an individual could simply
claim to be part of this family, which had recently migrated, was well-
respected, and then ALL suddenly killed sparring only himself and an
accompanying woman whom he claimed as his mother? Were this
family the desired theological pedigry for such an individual, could not
their very deaths have been deliberate and orchastrated acts of murder?
Since so much of the Ummah appears to trust this one-eyed
charleton (even many in the Ummah who might otherwise not be
considered extremists in nature), there is no one who has ever
investigated this matter. Doing a search on the Internet for “Mullah
Ùmar” and also the word “Dajjaal” we are returned absolutely zero
results in 2001, when I first attempted it. In the following years, the only
results returned were from articles and controversial discussions
throughout the Web that were started both by me and by friends. What is
significant about this?
For starters, this man has a very shady background. He is fits every
Hadeeth about Al-Maseehu-d-Dajjaal. He is blind in the right eye, and
84
“walks with one sandal,” whether this is to fake an injury or not. Not
withstanding his identicle match-up with Antichrist prophecies, prior to
my publicizing of this, there was no one who had openly promoted such
notions. The very fact that this “hidden in plain sight” approach of
Ùmar aroused no suspicion in the Ummah seems even more of an
indication of his Satanic abilities of deception.
We know that another sign of the Dajjaal is that he walks bow
legged. By faking an injury to one leg he can then justify a limp by
claiming it is from a prothetic leg. By claiming that this injury was a
result of an injury in the course of Jihaad, the cattle-like tribes of
Pakistan and Afghanistan dare not to question such a “freedom fighter”
regarding his “injury.” Nevertheless, this was not his only injury
supposedly “fighting in the way of Allaah,” and neither would it be his
most significant…
85
The Talibanist Propaganda Regarding Ùmar’s Injuries

At the onset of the war against the Communists and the Russians, Ùmar
was said to have been fighting in the Beirut district of Uruzgan Province.
The Taliban claims that it was whilst he was wrecking the ranks of the
disbelieving invaders that he sustained serious injuries on two occasions.
The first time was when his leg was badly inured by rocket shrapnel and
the second time was when he came under intense machinegun fire,
which left his body riddled with bullets. He received medical treatment
for the extreme wounds inflicted on his body. Taliban propaganda states:
“Soon, by the grace of Allaah, he regained his health and was back in the
battlefield to devastate the enemies of Allaah.”
How soon? According to them it was within less than a week, though
they claim he had been riddled with two and a half dozen rifle rounds
from an AK-47. This feat alone would make Ùmar the only known
person in history to have survived so many hits from a 7.62 x 39 caliber
weapon. Taliban propaganda continues:
“His valour and gallantry filled the enemies with terror and his ceaseless
attacks on the Communists raised alarm. His experienced and perceptive
uncle anticipated the designs and conspiracies of the Communists and
advised him to move the centre of his guerrilla operations to the South-
Western district of Panjwai. Another reason for selecting this area was that
the Kandahar-Herat highway passed through this district, which was a
crucial supply line for the Communists. This busy road was an excellent
target for guerrilla activities, so Mulla Ùmar moved his unit of Mujahidin
to Panjwai. His excellence as a leader, competence as a tactician and
unmatched fearlessness made him emerge as an exemplary guerrilla
commander.”
It is important to note, that even by the Taliban’s admission, this is not

the simple tribal leader that the media has often portrayed him as in the
wake of Western forces standing down and allowing him to escape. An
86
unbiased study of the situation reveals that it is no exaggeration to claim

that Ùmar is a “tactician.” This is the same man who confidently
claimed that his actions following 9.11 were a matter of tact, rather than
a knee-jerk reaction of a stubborn tribal leader (which Western media
seemed quick to paint him as).
Ùmar’s propagandists claim:
“It was during the period when he was fighting the Russians in the area of
Sangsar, that he was badly injured for the third time, in an intense
encounter with the Soviets. This time he sacrificed his right eye in the Way of
Allaah .”
For the Ummah that profession seems to seal it. He said he lost his eye
then and there, so he must have. The real question is why are Muslims
with two eyes being so blind as to not see this individual for who he is?
Do they honestly expect the Dajjaal, the Antichrist, - who according to
the Prophets was sent by Iblees and the Jinn as the confuser of mankind
- to come out and tell you who he is? Do they think he plays by the same
rules as us? Do they think that he will not lie, steal and murder to
accomplish his ends? The naivety of the Ummah is perhaps the most
perplexing factor in this equasion.
It is not enough that his propagandists (and never him), have a
ready excuse to justify why he appears identical to the Dajjaal that was
prophesied. He vainly calls himself “Àmeeru-l-Mu’minoon,” a title that
he bestowed upon himself, yet he would undeniably withhold from Àli
ibn Abi Taalib. He claims to be a descendant of Muhammad without any
authenticity or evidence to substantiate such a claim. He waves the black
standard of Muhammad as Imaamu-l-Mahdi is foretold to. Some Taliban
supporters are even now suggesting that this kaafir IS the Mahdi! Are
we to believe that Muhammad would not have mentioned that the Mahdi
would be blind in the right eye just like his enemy the Dajjaal!?! Have
the Hanafiyyah forgotten that it is haraam for them to have a blind or
partially blind Khalifah? A man cannot even be a doctor according to
87
their fiqh if he is blind in one eye, yet this man professes to be

“Àmeeru-l-Mu’minoon!”
This murderer is blind in the right eye, walks with one sandal and
subsequently could very well appear to walk bow-legged before having
pretended to loose the lower part of his leg, to justify his limp. Again no
one is asking these questions, and that is by far the biggest give away of
all.
Who would imagine such a figure as this arising and literally no
one making any public suggestions that he might be the Dajjaal? The
fact that he has deceived the majority, and that he is not suspected lends
further evidence to the fact that he is the prophesied Dajjaal. His
propagandists further note:
“His companions said that he was taken to a hospital in Quetta, Pakistan,

due to the severity of his injury. After surgery, he was advised by the doctors
to make Tayammum (dirt ablution without water) instead of making Wudhu
(ablution with water) since water could have aggravated his wounds.
Against the doctors’ advice, he always used water for ablution and never
prayed without proper Wudhu. He used to say: ’It is not possible for me to
stop making Wudhu for such minor wounds.’”
In otherwords the author was not there to see this display of machismo.
Under legitimate Shariyàh, there is no benifit in making wudhu if it
would cause you bodily harm. In the same way it might seem “ultra-
spiritual” for one to fast every single day. Though there is benefit to
fasting a lot there are many days that Muhammad said we must feast. If
one wishes to fast “every” day, then they should fast Shahar Ramadan
and then 6 days following Èidu-l-Fitr. That is equivalent to a
continuous, year-round fast as it requires a tremendous amount of
discipline to engage in a post fast feast and then resume fasting for six
more days when others have resumed normal eating habits. This is
merely one example of many where more asceticism is not necessarily
viewed as better from an Islaamic perspective.
So the Islaamic attitude is not that more is always better, or that
aggrivating your wounds against a doctor’s orders makes you somehow
88
mythically pious. That in fact makes you less pious because you are not
using Tayammum for what it was introduced for. You are not following
the Sunnah of Muhammad, you are following the Sunnah of your
“nafs,” your ego that knows such an act will look exceptionally pious to
the uneducated.
89
A Marital Front
After the defeat and subsequent evacuation of the Soviet forces from
Afghanistan, Ùmar is said to have went back to his “religious studies.”
Once the “spin” factor is stripped from this claim, it in essence means
that he was unaccounted for at this time.
In a secret, private wedding he got married, supposedly at the age
of 31. He is claimed to have had two sons, Yaqoob and Idrees. Again,
obviously if he knows that students of prophecy are looking for an
impotent man, he would try to make it look like he had two sons. Where
are these sons? At least “Yaqoob’s” is dead. Talibanist propaganda
reads:
After the defeat and subsequent evacuation of the Soviet forces from
Afghanistan, Mulla Ùmar went back to his religious studies. In a quiet and
simple fashion, he got married at the age of 31. Allaah blessed him with two
sons, Yaqoob and Idrees. There have been reports of Yaqoob’s martyrdom
in the recent barbaric bombing by the Americans on Kandahar. While the
Mujahideen commanders initiated a power struggle for Kabool, he started to
teach at the local mosque.
No one knows who “Idrees” is, because like their alleged “father”
Ùmar, no one ever even allegedly sees these individual unless they are
at the absolute highest levels of the Taliban. Even then it is said that only
6 people have ever actually met the so-called Mullah. Of course, this is
just icing on the cake of confirming the so-called “Mullah’s” identity of
the Islaamic Antichrist. In this light, the propagandists claims of
Ùmar’s sons is absolutely unconvincing and unverifiable. To be
objective, one can at least say that there is no evidence that such
individuals either exist or do not exist.
90
Western Support For the Taliban

Perhaps one of the most damning factors both to Ùmar and to
“Domestic Enemies,” as rogue elements within Western governments, is
the Western support for the Taliban and Ùmar. As you will see, this is a
pattern that has existed all the way back to Paul and the Roman
protection and support for his actions as an agent of the Neronic state
that Jesus’ own disciple called “The Beast of the Sea,” which sits on
“seven hills.” Robert Scheer of the Los Angeles Times writes:
“Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists and destroy every
vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush Administration will
embrace you. All that matters is that you claim to line up as an ally in the
drug war, the only international cause that this nation still takes seriously.
“That’s the message sent with the recent gift of $43 million to the
Taliban rulers of Afghanistan, the most virulent anti-American violators of
human rights in the world today. The gift, announced last Thursday by
Secretary of State Colin Powell, in addition to other recent aid, makes the
United States the main sponsor of the Taliban and rewards that “rogue
regime” for declaring that opium growing is against the will of God. So, too,
by the Taliban’s estimation, are most human activities, but it’s the ban on
drugs that catches this administration’s attention.”
One could argue the immorality of subsidizing a government that treats

women like cattle, tortures dissenters, and forces non-Muslims to wear
identity badges, among other crimes against humanity. That would be
bad enough, but the U.N. had just condemned the Taliban for allowing
the cultivation of an opium crop and benefiting from its sale! Remember
all of those anti-drug commercials following 9.11; the commercials that
said if you do drugs then you are supporting terrorists? Robert Scheer
continued:
“So not only is the Bush Incorporated “grant” to the Taliban an inexcusable
subsidization of a stone age band of faith-based zealots, it is a horrifying
example of gross incompetence at taxpayer expense.”
91
The U.N. Report lucidly and cogently argued that the Taliban were
storing up Opium, waiting for a rise in the market price, before selling
the crop to the highest bidder. This “storage” period, was what
Talibanists propagandizes as “ridding” drugs from the market. In reality,
this was nothing more than cutting down on distribution in order to raise
prices. Robert Scheer writes that this is:
“…something that Cheney and Bush know well from the activities of their
oil baron backers. But even though Cheney and Bush are accomplices to this
very strategy being implemented now in order to inflate gasoline and energy
prices, they fell for the Taliban version of the Enron/Exxon “who hid the
energy/oil” Texas two-step.
“In a report to the Security Council, the five-member panel questioned
the sincerity of the Taliban’s supreme leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar,
when he banned the cultivation last July of poppy, the raw material used to
make heroin and opium. The report said the Taliban was stockpiling the
drugs, suggesting it only halted production in order to keep opium and
heroin prices from plummeting.
“According to the U.N. Office for Drug Control and Crime
Prevention, Afghanistan’s opium production was about 2,500 tons in 1998,
4,600 tons in 1999, and 3,100 tons in 2000. ‘If Taliban officials were sincere
in stopping the production of opium and heroin, then one would expect them
to order the destruction of all stocks existing in areas under their control,’
the report said. The panel, established to make recommendations on how
best to monitor a U.N. arms embargo and the closure of terrorist training
camps, said it was essential to look into the illicit drug trade because drug
money was being used to buy weapons and `finance the training of terrorists
and support the operations of extremists in neighboring countries and
beyond.’’
That’s our $43 million that the Bush Administration turned over to the
Taliban extremists. If Ùmar can pull the wool over the Bush
Administration’s eyes (which is accostomed to such corporate practices),
it is not difficult to see how they bamboozled so much of the Ummah
which is more or less unaquainted with such.
92
QUESTION: My question is, do you think the attacks on September 11 are

being trivialized by government propaganda campaigns, like those
commercials during the Super Bowl, which blamed drug users for funding
terrorist operations?
SECRETARY POWELL: No, I don’t think it’s being trivialized. There is one
aspect to it. We can make connections between international criminal
activities such as drug activity, which generates money, and that money can
find its way into terrorist organizations. Terrorist organizations don’t take
out loans at normal banks. They don’t do anything that earns income. So
they have to find their income usually through illicit means or likeminded
individuals in other countries who will fund these activities.
93
Where is the Dajjaal now?

With all of this born in mind, we are left with the cliff hanging question
as to where this character is now. Through the auspices of an influential
Jihaadi leader, Mohammad Shehzad spoke with the Taliban leader over
the phone from Kabool. Shehzad, who had met Ùmar in a cave near
Kandahar in October 2002, positively identified the voice. His questions,
and the subsequent answers, may shed some light on what is brewing
behind the scenes for the next chapter in the unfolding of Islaamic
eschatological fufillment of prophecy.
Mohammad Shehzad: Where are you? How is your health? What are
you doing for food?
Ùmar: I cannot disclose my location due to security reasons. I change it

very frequently. But I can tell you I am in Afghanistan. I am perfectly
fine. Food should not be an issue for a true Muslim. God feeds me like
he feeds other Muslims.
Mohammad Shehzad: How did you manage to escape the US troops in

Afghanistan? Are stories of your under-the-moonlight motorcycle
getaway fact or myth?
Ùmar: This does not matter how I managed to escape. What really
matters is God’s mercy, kindness and greatness. He has been protecting
Osama bin Laden and myself when the US warplanes were intensively
bombarding the Tora Bora caves. It was almost impossible to escape
this attack. But by the grace of God, we did not receive a single scratch.
Mohammad Shehzad: Did you flee to Pakistan?
Ùmar: I am not sure. Perhaps! The border between the two countries is
so contiguous that it is extremely difficult to judge whether one is
94
physically in Pakistan or Afghanistan. We don’t stay at one place and

keep moving.
95
Unveiling the Lies

Throughout the Talibanist propaganda machine – working over time
throughout the Masaajid in all nations and the Internet alike – we see
legend after legend of Ùmar that would seem to paint him as the most
pious man since the days of Muhammad and Àli. Consider the
following quote from a Talibanist propaganda piece on Ùmar’s
biography:
Once a delegation of guest came to visit Mulla Ùmar. Fresh bread, cream,
tea and other delicacies were brought for the guests and they all began to eat
heartily. All except Mulla Ùmar that is. He refused to touch the cream or
the bread. His guests ushered him to eat with them but he refused. His
advisors also urged him to eat with the guests, indicating that there was
nothing wrong with him eating this food since it had not been brought
especially for him; it was brought for the guests and he was the host. He still
refused. A few moments later, a worker brought in a bowl of plain soup
together with some hard, stale bread. Mulla Ùmar proceeded to break the
hard bread with his hands and eat it with the soup. Upon being asked the
reasons for his refusal to eat the cream, Mulla Ùmar said: “When the lowest
person in my country eats this food, then I will eat it.”
Well this certainly sounds very noble and pious. The only problem is
that after the Taliban fled their strongholds, following the initial U.S.
invasion of Afghanistan, CNN videotaped a tour of the so-called
“Mullah’s” palatial home. In it were fine paintings, gold plating nearly
everywhere the eye could see, and running water even in each of the
stalls of his cattle. Now if the Talibanist propaganda of him were in fact
true, then why would the man live in such a manner and yet refuse to eat
cream and fresh bread because others under his rule were deprived of it?
The truth is clear; the propaganda is fiction that transposes the
actions of Àliyy ibn Abiy Taalib (the son-in-law of Muhammad), with
that of Ùmar. In fact, the quote in this fairy tale is simply a paraphrase
from a hadeeth of Àliyy, that he would not dress in finer clothes than
the poorest person in the Ummah.
96
Appendix A
PORTER GOSS THE NEW CIA HEAD LINKED TO FUNDING
911 TERROR ATTACKS
by Dave Williams Friday August 13, 2004 at 10:04 AM
Porter Goss Republican congressman Porter Goss the new CIA director
are linked to the moneyman that funded 911 terror attack. The chairmen
of the Joint Inquiry have dubious links to Pakistan’s Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI) which is known to have actively supported Al Qaeda
and the Taliban. Moreover, according to intelligence sources, including
the FBI, Pakistan’s ISI played a role in financing the 9/11 terrorist
attacks.
The two Joint Inquiry chairmen Sen Bob Graham and Rep Porter
Goss were fully cognizant of the “Pakistani ISI connection” and the role
played by its former head, General Mahmoud Ahmad. Why then did
they choose to exclude an examination of the role of the ISI from the
Joint Inquiry’s 858 page Report?
While hinting to “Saudi support and involvement” in 9/11, the
Report fails to mention that the Pakistani government, its military and
intelligence apparatus (ISI), have actively supported and financed a
number of terrorist organizations, with the support of Washington.
Was it “an intelligence failure” to seek the cooperation of the
Pakistani government in the “war on terrorism” in an agreement
brokered by the head of the ISI, a spy agency, which is known to support
the Islaamic brigades?
This support by Pakistan’s ISI to various “Islaamic terrorist”
organizations was pursued prior as well as in the wake of 9/11, despite
the commitment of the Pakistani government to “cooperate” with
Washington.
In late August 2001, barely a couple of weeks before September
11, Senator Bob Graham, Representative Porter Goss and Senator Jon
Kyl were on a top level mission in Islaamabad, which was barely
mentioned by the US media.
97
Meetings were held with President Pervez Musharraf and with

Pakistan’s military and intelligence brass including the head of
Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) General Mahmoud Ahmad.
Amply documented, the ISI is known to support a number of Islaamic
terrorist organizations. (See Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) at
http://www.cfrterrorism.org/coalition/pakistan2.html )
According to the FBI, Indian Intelligence and several press reports, the
ISI Head was instrumental in providing financial support to the 9/11
terrorists. General Mahmoud Ahmad had allegedly ordered the transfer
of $100.000 to the presumed 9/11 ring-leader Mohamed Atta.
On the morning of September 11, the three lawmakers Bob
Graham, Porter Goss and Jon Kyl (who were part of the Congressional
delegation to Pakistan) were having breakfast on Capitol Hill with
General Ahmad, the alleged “money-man” (to use the FBI expression)
behind the 9/11 hijackers. Also present at this meeting were Pakistan’s
ambassador to the U.S. Maleeha Lodhi and several members of the
Senate and House Intelligence committees. This meeting was described
by one press report as a “follow-up meeting” to that held in Pakistan in
late August.
When the twin towers were attacked, General Mahmoud Ahmad,
head of Pakistan’s intelligence service, was, in Senator Graham’s own
words, “very empathetic, sympathetic to the people of the United
States,” (Stuart News Company Press Journal (Vero Beach, FL),
September 12, 2001). Bob Graham’s description of the General Ahmad,
contrasts with that of the Washington Post:
“On the morning of Sept. 11, Goss and Graham were having breakfast
with a Pakistani general named Mahmud Ahmed — the soon-to-be-
sacked head of Pakistan’s intelligence service. Ahmed ran a spy agency
notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.” (Washington
Post, 18 May 2002).
While the Joint inquiry has collected mountains of intelligence
material, through careful omission, the numerous press and intelligence
98
reports in the public domain (mainstream media, alternative media, etc),

which confirm that key members of the Bush Administration were
involved in acts of political camouflage, have been carefully removed
from the Joint inquiry’s hearings.
3 August 2003
The following text published in Global Outlook, Winter 2003, provides

details on the breakfast meeting hosted by Sen Bob Gram and Rep.
Porter Goss on the morning of September 11.
In late August 2001, barely a couple of weeks before 9/11, Senator
Bob Graham, Representative Porter Goss and Senator Jon Kyl were in
Islaamabad for consultations. Meetings were held with President
Musharraf and with Pakistan’s military and intelligence brass including
the head of Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) General
Mahmoud Ahmad. An AFP report confirms that the US Congressional
delegation also met the Afghan ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam
Zaeef. At this meeting, which was barely mentioned by the US media,
“Zaeef assured the US delegation [on behalf of the Afghan government]
that the Taliban would never allow bin Laden to use Afghanistan to
launch attacks on the US or any other country.” 1
Note the sequencing of these meetings. Bob Graham and Porter
Goss were in Islaamabad in late August 2001. The meetings with
President Musharraf and the Afghan Ambassador were on the 27th of
August, the mission was still in Islaamabad on the 30th of August,
General Mahmoud Ahmad arrived in Washington on an official visit of
consultations barely a few days later (September 4th). During his visit to
Washington, General Mahmoud met his counterpart CIA director
George Tenet and high ranking officials of the Bush administration.2
9/11 “Follow-up Meeting” on Capitol Hill
On the morning of September 11, the three lawmakers Bob Graham,

Porter Goss and Jon Kyl (who were part of the Congressional delegation
99
to Pakistan) were having breakfast on Capitol Hill with General Ahmad,

the alleged “money-man” behind the 9-11 hijackers. Also present at this
meeting were Pakistan’s ambassador to the U.S. Maleeha Lodhi and
several members of the Senate and House Intelligence committees were
also present. This meeting was described by one press report as a
“follow-up meeting” to that held in Pakistan in late August. “On 8/30,
Senate Intelligence Committee chair Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL) ‘was on a
mission to learn more about terrorism.’ (…) On 9/11, Graham was back
in DC ‘in a follow-up meeting with’ Pakistan intelligence agency chief
Mahmud Ahmed and House Intelligence Committee chair Porter Goss
(R-FL)” 3 (The Hotline, 1 October 2002):
“When the news [of the attacks on the World Trade Center] came, the
two Florida lawmakers who lead the House and Senate intelligence
committees were having breakfast with the head of the Pakistani
intelligence service. Rep. Porter Goss, R-Sanibel, Sen. Bob Graham and
other members of the House Intelligence Committee were talking about
terrorism issues with the Pakistani official when a member of Goss’ staff
handed a note to Goss, who handed it to Graham. “We were talking
about terrorism, specifically terrorism generated from Afghanistan,”
Graham said.
Mahmood Ahmed, director general of Pakistan’s intelligence service,

was “very empathetic, sympathetic to the people of the United States,”
Graham said.
Goss could not be reached Tuesday [September 11]. He was
whisked away with much of the House leadership to an undisclosed
“secure location.” Graham, meanwhile, participated in late-afternoon
briefings with top officials from the CIA and FBI.” 4
While trivializing the importance of the 9/11 breakfast meeting,
The Miami Herald (16 September 2001) confirms that General Ahmad
also met Secretary of State Colin Powell in the wake of the 9/11 attacks:
“Graham said the Pakistani intelligence official with whom he met, a top
general in the government, was forced to stay all week in Washington
100
because of the shutdown of air traffic ‘He was marooned here, and I
think that gave Secretary of State Powell and others in the administration
a chance to really talk with him’. Graham said.”5
Again the political significance of the personal relationship
between General Mahmoud (the alleged “money man” behind 9/11) and
Secretary of State Colin Powell is casually dismissed. According to The
Miami Herald, the high level meeting between the two men was not
planned in advance. It took place on the spur of the moment because of
the shut down of air traffic, which prevented General Mahmoud from
flying back home to Islaamabad on a commercial flight, when in all
probability the General and his delegation were traveling on a chartered
government plane. With the exception of the Florida press (and
Salon.com, 14 September), not a word was mentioned in the US media’s
September coverage of 9-11 concerning this mysterious breakfast
reunion.
“A Cloak but No Dagger”
Eight months later on the 18th of May, two days after the “BUSH
KNEW” headline hit the tabloids, the Washington Post published an
article on Porter Goss, entitled: “A Cloak But No Dagger; An Ex-Spy
Says He Seeks Solutions, Not Scapegoats for 9/11”. Focusing on his
career as a CIA agent, the article largely served to underscore the
integrity and commitment of Porter Goss to waging a “war on
terrorism”. Yet in an isolated paragraph, the article acknowledges the
mysterious 9/11 breakfast meeting with ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad,
while also confirming that “Ahmad :ran a spy agency notoriously close
to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban”:
“Now the main question facing Goss, as he helps steer a joint
House-Senate investigation into the Sept. 11 attacks, is why nobody in
the far-flung intelligence bureaucracy -- 13 agencies spending billions of
dollars -- paid attention to the enemy among us. Until it was too late.
Goss says he is looking for solutions, not scapegoats. “A lot of
nonsense,” he calls this week’s uproar about a CIA briefing that alerted
101
President Bush, five weeks before Sept. 11, that Osama bin Laden’s
associates might be planning airline hijackings.
“None of this is news, but it’s all part of the finger-pointing,” Goss
declared yesterday in a rare display of pique. “It’s foolishness.” [This
statement comes from the man who was having breakfast with the
alleged “money-man” behind 9-11 on the morning of September 11]
Goss has repeatedly refused to blame an “intelligence failure” for
the terror attacks. As a 10-year veteran of the CIA’s clandestine
operations wing, Goss prefers to praise the agency’s “fine work.”
On the morning of Sept. 11, Goss and Graham were having
breakfast with a Pakistani general named Mahmud Ahmed -- the soon-
to-be-sacked head of Pakistan’s intelligence service. Ahmed ran a spy
agency notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. 6
(Washington Post, 18 May 2002)
“Putting Two and Two together”
While the Washington Post scores in on the “notoriously close” links

between General Ahmad and Osama bin Laden, it fails to dwell on the
more important question: what were Rep. Porter Goss and Senator Bob
Graham and other members of the Senate and House intelligence
committees doing together with the alleged 9/11 “money-man” at
breakfast on the morning of 9/11. In other words, the Washington Post
report does not go one inch further in begging the real question: Was this
mysterious breakfast venue a “political lapse”, an intelligence failure or
something far more serious? How come the very same individuals (Goss
and Graham) who had developed a personal rapport with General
Ahmad, had been entrusted under the joint committee inquiry “to reveal
the truth on 9-11.”(see p. )
The media trivializes the breakfast meeting, it presents it as a
simple fait divers and fails to “put two and two together”. Neither does it
acknowledge the fact, amply documented, that “the money-man” behind
the hijackers had been entrusted by the Pakistani government to discuss
the precise terms of Pakistan’s “collaboration” in the “war on terrorism”
102
in meetings held behind closed doors at the State department on the 12th
and 13th of September. 11 7(See Michel Chossudovsky, op cit)
Smoking Gun
When the “foreknowledge” issue hit the street on May 16th, “Chairman
Porter Goss said an existing congressional inquiry has so far found ‘no
smoking gun’ that would warrant another inquiry.” 8 This statement
points to an obvious “cover-up”. The smoking gun was right there sitting
in the plush surroundings of the Congressional breakfast venue on
Capitol on the morning of September 11.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes
1 Agence France Presse (AFP), 28 August 2001.
2. Michel Chossudovsky, Political Deception, The Missing Link behind 9/11, Global Outlook,
No. 2, 2002, See also . http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html ; See also Michel
Chossudovsky, Cover-up or Complicity of the Bush Administration? The Role of Pakistan’s
Military Intelligence (ISI) in the September 11 Attacks, November 2001,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO111A.html
3. The Hotline, 1 October 2002.
4 Stuart News Company Press Journal, Vero Beach, FL, 12 September 2001.
5 Miami Herald, 16 September 2001.
6. Washington Post, 18 May 2002.
7. Michel Chossudovsky, op. cit.
8. White House Bulletin, 17 May 2002.
103
Appendix B
Decline and fall of Taliban?
Published on: Wednesday, 26 Ramadhan 1422 (12 December 2001)
http://www.shianews.com/hi/articles/politics/0000180.php
By Syed Ali Mehdi
They came, they saw, they conquered. The Northern Alliance swept over
a substantial portion of Afghanistan’s political landscape in a matter of
few days. Nobody would have ever dreamt, including the sophisticatedly
and modernly equipped international coalition against terrorism, that
these ferocious Taliban could be tamed so bloodlessly.
Leaders of different factions gathered in Bonn for a discussion on
the formation of post-Taliban, broad-based, government. But after all
this, what has gone unacknowledged is Taliban’s unswerving
commitment to their ideological guest, Saudi-born-exile, Osama bin
Laden, lending credence to a Hindi proverb:Jan jaye par vachan na
jaye[life may go, but not promise]. Was Osama so much important for
the Taliban that they readily agreed to put their global image, their
economy, their political rule, even their existence, at stake? Even
Washington is skeptical. Whether it has been a tactical retreat or an
actual rout, it is very much likely that their aptitudes and spirit shall
continue to hover the global skies in the times to come. Mullah Omar
seems to be proclaiming: “US bombings can destroy our bases; but they
cannot dent the base of our resolve.” Indeed, the coalition needs to re-
analyze the motivations of human behavior from a perspective that is
very different from theirs.
If the Taliban had an overriding lust for power and wealth, they
would have negotiated the case for America’s Most Wanted more
advantageously than perhaps President Musharraf, in which case the
dollars could have been conveniently poured to an adjoining border,
apart from worldwide diplomatic recognition and lifting of sanctions.
Had they been confident of their military prowess and guerilla
experiences with the Soviet, then again there would have been no sense
104
in their undefended vacation of Kabool along with other areas. Despite

heavy shelling and simultaneous advances by the Northern Alliance, was
there a need for Rumsfeld and then Bush himself to admit that they may
never be able to capture or eradicate their prime target? Bombs are
nothing but bombs; if they cannot dent the steel of American resolve,
how can they undermine the base of Taliban’s devotion? By 1818, the
first Saudi-Wahhabi state was brought to an end by the elitist Ottoman
forces, only to resurface more robustly in the early part of twentieth
century. Just as Wahhabism was, and continues to be, a stream of
thought and style, Taliban represents an ideological current whose scope
is not, or not at all, nationalistic but universal. Perhaps, this is the reason
which does not cause much worry to commanders of the militia, even at
the prospect of annihilation of its armaments or large-scale murder of
mujahideen.
If not soon, maybe after a decade or two or later, Taliban or
Taliban-inspired organizations are sure to re-emerge, and perhaps with
stronger force. Men are killed, countries are destroyed, ideas are neither.
U.S. strikes have damaged the civilians and their property, which have
never mattered much for the Taliban, but cannot put an end to the
designs of these reactionaries who promise more such attacks as
September 11 to the western world. Washington fears the weekend
attacks on Israel as a possible fallout of the Afghan war. There are
reports that some of Taliban’s top leaders have fled to NWFP to form a
splinter group. In addition, nobody in the offensive is aware of the exact
whereabouts of either Osama bin Laden or Mullah Omar. So far, the
core group of Taliban and Al-Qaida leaders have survived U.S.-led
attacks. This is not surprising if we look at Iraq where even after a
decade, Saddam Hussain is alive and kicking while more than a million
innocent civilians have been mercilessly taken by the U.S. strikes since
the Gulf War. Is it like father, like son?
Despite serious setbacks to its policy of supporting opposition
groups in different countries, the most recent being Iraq and
Afghanistan, Washington is not ready to change its approach, no matter
it may have to repeat the same actions over and again. According to
105
Reuters, Pentagon is considering to lend its military and financial

assistance to forces antithetical to Saddam’s regime. Can the superpower
be so imprudent? Or, is it sensitive only to its strategic and diplomatic
interests?
106
Appendix C
Mulla Omar operating freely in Pakistan: Afghan FM
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%5C03%5C03%5Cstory_3-
3-2006_pg7_8
Friday, March 03, 2006
KABOOL: Afghanistan has hit back at Pakistan’s dismissal of its

intelligence about Taliban and Al Qaeda militants in Pakistani territory,
notably information about the whereabouts of the reclusive Taliban
leader Mulla Omar.
Afghanistan handed over the information during a visit last month
by President Hamid Karzai to Pakistan — a key ally in the US “war on
terror”.
Pakistan at first denied in statements to the media that it had
received the intelligence and then said most of it was outdated, including
about the possible whereabouts of the fugitive Omar. Foreign Minister
Abdullaah Abdullaah questioned Pakistan’s attitude. He said that
Afghanistan would not have handed over information it did not believe
in and neighbours were expected to share details of the common threat.
“We wouldn’t have given anything to them had we not been sure
about its credibility,” he said in an interview.
Abdullaah said Afghanistan believed most of the “Taliban leaders
that are actively instigating terror in Afghanistan” were in Pakistan, with
Omar known to have spent time in the border city of Peshawar and in
Balochistan. “We have provided evidence of him being outside of
Afghanistan, in Quetta in Balochistan, to our Pakistani friends.” This
was not for “one day, not one hour but time and again in Quetta.”
Afghan officials have repeatedly accused Pakistan of turning a blind eye
to Taliban training camps on its soil and also alleged that some circles in
Pakistan support the hardliners. Pakistan denies the accusations, pointing
to the tens of thousands of troops it has had in the region for two years to
hunt down the militants. It also claims to have netted two-thirds of the
Qaeda leaders in its territory.
107
On Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, Abdullaah said: “I hope he

will be captured one day, the same way that these two-thirds of Al
Qaeda leaders have been captured.” On Wednesday the Pakistani
military said it had killed 40 Al Qaeda suspects in a ground and air strike
on a militant training camp in a tribal area bordering Afghanistan.
President Musharraf, in an interview with the BBC aired Wednesday,

said his country was taking “all possible measures” against militants.
Abdullaah said the least that could be expected from Pakistan was that it
would go after camps known to be training militants. “When there are
80,000 troops in those areas, when there is a well-established security
service the least which is expected is that those training camps in the
vicinity will be stopped from operating,” he said. The minister said
allegations from Islaamabad that Afghan intelligence was in collusion
with India or that there were factions within Afghanistan that opposed
Pakistan were “a paranoia that they should overcome”. afp
108
Appendix D
Kabool mocks Islaamabad’s swift denial over Mulla Omar
Daily Times, Pakistan
Tuesday, December 02, 2003
KABOOL: Afghanistan on Sunday questioned Islaamabad’s swift denial

of President Hamid Karzai’s claim that fugitive Taliban leader Mulla
Omar had been seen in Quetta. “The Afghan government is surprised by
the swift reaction and we are wondering whether the authorities know
where Mulla Omar is if they so strongly reject his presence in Quetta,”
Afghan Foreign Ministry spokesman Omar Samad told AFP. In an
interview with the British newspaper The Times published on Saturday,
Karzai said he had information that Mulla Omar was seen offering
Friday prayers recently in Quetta.
“He (Karzai) has information that Mulla Omar has been seen in
Quetta,” Samad said, but would not elaborate. “Have they (Pakistani
authorities) investigated into this matter so quickly to be sure he is not in
Quetta?” he asked. Pakistan Saturday rejected Karzai’s claim that the
Taliban leader was in Quetta, saying Islaamabad has been actively
supporting Afghanistan’s reconstruction. Samad said Omar’s
whereabouts would be discussed at a tripartite meeting between
Afghanistan, Pakistan and the US.Kabool mocks Islaamabad’s swift
denial over Mulla Omar
KABOOL: Afghanistan on Sunday questioned Islaamabad’s swift denial

of President Hamid Karzai’s claim that fugitive Taliban leader Mulla
Omar had been seen in Quetta.
“The Afghan government is surprised by the swift reaction and we
are wondering whether the authorities know where Mulla Omar is if they
so strongly reject his presence in Quetta,” Afghan Foreign Ministry
spokesman Omar Samad told AFP. In an interview with the British
newspaper The Times published on Saturday, Karzai said he had
109
information that Mulla Omar was seen offering Friday prayers recently
in Quetta.
“He (Karzai) has information that Mulla Omar has been seen in
Quetta,” Samad said, but would not elaborate. “Have they (Pakistani
authorities) investigated into this matter so quickly to be sure he is not in
Quetta?” he asked. Pakistan Saturday rejected Karzai’s claim that the
Taliban leader was in Quetta, saying Islaamabad has been actively
supporting Afghanistan’s reconstruction. Samad said Omar’s
whereabouts would be discussed at a tripartite meeting between
Afghanistan, Pakistan and the US. —AFP
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_1-12-
2003_pg1_5
110
Appendix E
The Most Recent Interview With the So-Called “Mullah” (at the time of
writing)
Through the auspices of an influential Jihaadi leader, Mohammad

Shehzad spoke with the Taliban supremo over the phone from
Kabool. Shehzad, who had met Omar in a cave near Kandahar in
October 2002, positively identified the voice.
Mohammad Shehzad: Where are you? How is your health? What are
you doing for food?
Ùmar: I cannot disclose my location due to security reasons. I change it

very frequently. But I can tell you I am in Afghanistan. I am perfectly
fine. Food should not be an issue for a true Muslim. God feeds me like
he feeds other Muslims.
Mohammad Shehzad: What is your strength? Who provides you arms

and ammunition?
Ùmar: We are so many in numbers that our strength cannot be counted.

Before vacating the country, we had dumped the arms and ammunition
in huge quantities at various secret locations. We have enough to fight
for decades. Moreover, we snatch arms and ammunition from the
coalition forces just like we seized it from the Soviet forces.
Mohammad Shehzad: What is your strategy?
Ùmar: We carry out guerilla activities. We recently carried out some

suicide attacks that have been very fruitful by the grace of God. We have
set up a special suicide squad that consists of 2,000 Taliban. This squad
will make life hell for the US and its allies and force them out of
Afghanistan. Insha Allaah!
111
Mohammad Shehzad: How did you manage to escape the US troops in

Afghanistan? Are stories of your under-the-moonlight motorcycle
getaway fact or myth?
Ùmar: This does not matter how I managed to escape. What really
matters is God’s mercy, kindness and greatness. He has been protecting
Osama bin Laden and myself when the US warplanes were intensively
bombarding the Tora Bora caves. It was almost impossible to escape
this attack. But by the grace of God, we did not receive a single scratch.
Mohammad Shehzad: Did you flee to Pakistan?
Ùmar: I am not sure. Perhaps! The border between the two countries is
so contiguous that it is extremely difficult to judge whether one is
physically in Pakistan or Afghanistan. We don’t stay at one place and
keep moving.
Mohammad Shehzad: When was the last time you met or heard from
Osama? Is he alive?
Ùmar: I met him months ago and we are in contact with each other. He
is very much alive and kicking.
Mohammad Shehzad: Where is he?
Ùmar: You think I will tell you! All I can says is, he is not in your
(Pakistan) tribal areas!
Mohammad Shehzad: You said you are in contact with Osama. What is
your mode of communication?
Ùmar: I cannot go into details. There could be several ways. We have

our own traditional system of communication.
112
Mohammad Shehzad: Do you regret lending support to Osama and

hosting him in your country?
Ùmar: Not at all. Osama is the greatest mujahid of the present times.
He is not a terrorist as propagated by the US. He fought for
Afghanistan. He saved Afghans. How could we regret hosting him? I
asked the world to provide evidence again him. He was innocent.
Therefore, nobody -- even Saudi Arabia -- could prove anything against
him.
We had tremendous pressure to expel him -- even from our friends
like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Your [former Pakistan] interior
minister Moinuddin Haider and even General Pervez Musharraf met me
personally to seek Osama’s extradition. But I refused. We paid a very
heavy price for this decision. But we proved that the Taliban were
independent people. They were nobody’s product as portrayed by the
media.
Mohammad Shehzad: The Taliban could have escaped the US wrath had
they expelled Osama…
Ùmar: We don’t care for the US wrath! We are only afraid of God’s
wrath. The US was hell-bent to topple our legitimate government. It
would have still done so even had Osama been expelled.
Mohammad Shehzad: Don’t you think you unnecessarily antagonised

the international community? After all, what was the rationale behind
destroying the Bamiyan Buddha?
Ùmar: I did not want to destroy the Bamiyan Buddha. In fact, some
foreigners came to me and said they would like to conduct the repair
work of the Bamiyan Buddha that had been slightly damaged due to
rains. This shocked me. I thought, these callous people have no regard
for thousands of living human beings -- the Afghans who are dying of
hunger, but they are so concerned about non-living objects like the
113
Buddha. This was extremely deplorable. That is why I ordered its

destruction. Had they come for humanitarian work, I would have never
ordered the Buddha’s destruction.
Mohammad Shehzad: What is your opinion about General Musharraf?
Ùmar: General Musharraf was used by the US to topple our legitimate

government. Thus he has committed a major sin. We will not forgive
him! He is not loyal to Pakistan. He has betrayed the people of Pakistan
as well as the Muslim nationhood. Like Bush, he too is a threat to the
Muslim unity. I urge the people of Pakistan to wage Jihaad against
Musharraf, remove him from power and punish him severely.
Mohammad Shehzad: Afghans have chosen a constitution. They will be

electing their president soon. Don’t you think the country is moving
toward stability?
Ùmar: All the delegates of the Loya Jirga were criminals as rightly
pointed out by a young lady [Malalai Joya]. She showed the courage of
telling the delegates that they were murderers of innocent people of
Afghanistan and they should be dragged to the national and
international courts of justice. The Loya Jirga is a US ploy to derive
legitimacy for the Karzai government. We denounce it.
Our position is clear: we will kill all those who will register
themselves as voters or cast votes in the forthcoming election. We will
kill all those who support the US and its allies in any manner. America
is the greatest evil on earth. It is the enemy of Islaam. Whoever is the US
friend is the enemy of Islaam. Killing the enemies of Islaam is Jihaad.
We have already consigned to hell more than 1,000 infidels that include
the Americans, their allies and their Afghan flunkies.
Mohammad Shehzad: Have you issued a religious ruling to kill women

that are working with aid agencies in Afghanistan?
114
Ùmar: Yes. As I said, whoever sides with the US or its allies deserves
death. I am giving such women the last warning. If they do not dissociate
themselves from these agencies within 30 days and confine themselves to
the boundary wall of their houses, death will be their destiny. These
agencies are preaching Christianity under the cover of development.
Most of the Afghans have become apostate. They also deserve death. We
will kill them.
Mohammad Shehzad: What do you think of Afghan President Hamid

Karzai?
Ùmar: He is a puppet of America, just like Abdul Haq, Haji Abdul

Qadeer and Ahmad Shah Masoud. We condemned these three traitors to
death. Insha Allaah very soon, Karzai will also meet their fate. We want
to show the world how the Taliban treats traitors!
Mohammad Shehzad: Your former foreign minister Mullah Wakil

Ahmed Muttawakil has turned renegade after striking a deal with the
US. Another colleague Mullah Siddiqullaah has deserted you. Does not
it indicate ‘demoralisation’ among the Taliban?
Ùmar: The Taliban are not demoralised. Despair is a sin. The Taliban
are united. We are giving the US and the coalition forces a tough time.
We are hunting them down like pigs. We are very happy to learn that the
US is dispatching an additional contingent of more than 2,000 soldiers.
This will be a huge herd of pigs for us to hunt down. We are waiting
anxiously for their arrival!
Mullah Muttawakil has not tuned renegade. He is in US custody,
enduring the worst physical and mental torture. The US has failed to
extract anything from him. Moreover, the Taliban is the name of a
movement based on ideology. Such movements do not depend on
individuals, but conviction, belief and God’s support. All these elements
are very much there.
115
Mohammad Shehzad: A section of Afghan society says ’Mullah Omar’

is a brand name and not a real person.
Ùmar: You better ask General Moinuddin Haider [former interior

minister of Pakistan] or General Musharraf. They have met me. They
will tell you whether ‘Mullah Omar’ is a myth or a reality. However as
said earlier, our movement does not depend on individual. If I die today,
there will be many ‘Mullah Omars’ to replace me. Similarly, if Osama
dies today, there will be many ‘Osamas’ to replace him.
http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/apr/12inter.htm
116
Appendix F
The Bin Ladin Connection…
BERLIN, June 4 (Reuters) - U.S. and Taliban officials met secretly in

Frankfurt almost a year before the September 11 attacks to discuss terms
for the Afghans to hand over Ùsama bin Laden, according to a German
television documentary.
But no agreement was reached and no further negotiations took
place before the suicide hijackings in 2001, which bin Laden
subsequently hailed in a videotape as the work of his al Qaeda network.
ZDF television quoted Kabir Mohabbat, an Afghan-American
businessman, as saying he tried to broker a deal between the Americans
and the purist Islaamic Taliban rulers of Afghanistan, who were
sheltering bin Laden.
He quoted the Taliban foreign minister, Mullah Wakil Ahmed
Mutawakil, as saying: “You can have him whenever the Americans are
ready. Name us a country and we will extradite him.”
A German member of the European Parliament, Elmar Brok,
confirmed to Reuters that he had helped Mohabbat in 1999 to establish
initial contact with the Americans.
“I was told (by Mohabbat) that the Taliban had certain ideas about
handing over bin Laden, not to the United States but to a third country or
to the Court of Justice in The Hague,” Brok said.
“The message was: ‘There is willingness to talk about handing
over bin Laden’, and the aim of the Taliban was clearly to win the
recognition of the American government and the lifting of the boycott,”
he said, referring to the international isolation of the Taliban.
Brok said he was not in a position to judge how credible the offer
was, but he passed it to the U.S. ambassador to Germany, John
Kornblum. He said Mohabbat was then summoned to Washington to be
interviewed by U.S. officials.
117
This led in turn to the German meeting, which ZDF said took place
between Taliban ministers and U.S. officials in a Frankfurt hotel in
November 2000.
The documentary, broadcast on Thursday evening, said the
Afghans put forward “several offers” and there was talk of holding
further negotiations at the U.S. embassy in Pakistan on where and when
bin Laden would be handed over.
In fact, no more talks took place before September 11. But
negotiations did resume five days after the attacks, in the Pakistani city
of Quetta, ZDF said. This meeting has been previously reported in U.S.
media.
Mohabbat said the Americans pressed in Quetta for the handover
of bin Laden within 24 hours, but the Taliban were unable to meet that
demand.
Within weeks, U.S.-led forces intervened in Afghanistan to drive
the Taliban from power and kill, capture or disperse al Qaeda fighters
based in Afghan training camps. Bin Laden himself is still at large.
Brok said he had not personally taken part in either of the reported
meetings between the Taliban and the United States but believed there
had been a “political decision” not to pursue negotiations after the one in
Frankfurt.
He told ZDF: “I have to say that I consider this offer (on bin
Laden’s handover) very much more seriously with hindsight than I did at
the time.”
Former U.S. envoy Kornblum is now head of investment bank
Lazard in Germany, and his office said he had no comment. A U.S.
embassy spokesman said he was not familiar with the ZDF programme.
http://cnn.aimtoday.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?photoid=/cp/news/top/i/Ùsama
_pic135.jpg&idq=/ff/story/0002/20040604/0935099146.htm&floc=NW_1-T
Appendix G
Osama claims he has nukes: If US uses N-arms it will get
same response
118
By Hamid Mir
KABOOL, Nov 9: Osama bin Laden

has said that “we have chemical and
nuclear weapons as a deterrent and if
America used them against us we
reserve the right to use them”.
He said this in a special interview

with Hamid Mir, the editor of Ausaf,
for Dawn and Ausaf, at an
undisclosed location near Kabool.
This was the first interview given by Osama to any journalist after the
September 11 attacks in New York and Washington.
The correspondent was taken blindfolded in a jeep from Kabool on the

night of Nov 7 to a place where it was extremely cold and one could
hear the sound of anti-aircraft guns firing away. After a wait of some
time, Osama arrived with about a dozen bodyguards and Dr Ayman Al-
Zuwahiri and answered questions.
Hamid Mir: After American bombing on Afghanistan on Oct 7, you

told the Al-Jazeera TV that the Sept 11 attacks had been carried out by
some Muslims. How did you know they were Muslims ?
Osama bin Laden: The Americans themselves released a list of the

suspects of the Sept 11 attacks, saying that the persons named were
involved in the attacks. They were all Muslims, of whom 15 belonged to
Saudi Arabia, two were from the UAE and one from Egypt. According
to the information I have, they were all passengers.Fateha was held for
them in their homes. But America said they were hijackers.
HM: In your statement of Oct 7, you expressed satisfaction over the
119
Sept 11 attacks, although a large number of innocent people perished in

them, hundreds among them were Muslims. Can you justify the killing
of innocent men in the light of Islaamic teachings ?
OBL: This is a major point in jurisprudence. In my view, if an enemy

occupies a Muslim territory and uses common people as human shield,
then it is permitted to attack that enemy. For instance, if bandits barge
into a home and hold a child hostage, then the child’s father can attack
the bandits and in that attack even the child may get hurt.
America and its allies are massacring us in Palestine, Chechenya,

Kashmir and Iraq. The Muslims have the right to attack America in
reprisal. The Islaamic Shariat says Muslims should not live in the land of
the infidel for long. The Sept 11 attacks were not targeted at women and
children. The real targets were America’s icons of military and
economic power.
The Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) was against killing women and
children. When he saw a dead woman during a war, he asked why was
she killed ? If a child is above 13 and wields a weapon against Muslims,
then it is permitted to kill him.
The American people should remember that they pay taxes to their
government, they elect their president, their government manufactures
arms and gives them to Israel and Israel uses them to massacre
Palestinians. The American Congress endorses all government measures
and this proves that the entire America is responsible for the atrocities
perpetrated against Muslims. The entire America, because they elect the
Congress.
I ask the American people to force their government to give up anti-

Muslim policies. The American people had risen against their
government’s war in Vietnam. They must do the same today. The
American people should stop the massacre of Muslims by their
120
government.
HM: Can it be said that you are against the American government, not
the American people ?
OSB: Yes! We are carrying on the mission of our Prophet, Muhammad

(peace be upon him). The mission is to spread the word of God, not to
indulge massacring people. We ourselves are the target of killings,
destruction and atrocities. We are only defending ourselves. This is
defensive Jihaad. We want to defend our people and our land. That is
why I say that if we don’t get security, the Americans, too would not get
security.
This is a simple formula that even an American child can understand.

This is the formula of live and let live.
HM: The head of Egypt’s Jamia Al-Azhar has issued a fatwa (edict)
against you, saying that the views and beliefs of Osama bin Laden have
nothing to do with Islaam. What do you have to say about that ?
OSB: The fatwa of any official Aalim has no value for me. History is
full of such Ulema who justify Riba, who justify the occupation of
Palestine by the Jews, who justify the presence of American troops
around Harmain Sharifain. These people support the infidels for their
personal gain.The true Ulema support the Jihaad against America. Tell
me if Indian forces invaded Pakistan what would you do? The Israeli
forces occupy our land and the American troops are on our territory. We
have no other option but to launch Jihaad.
HM: Some Western media claim that you are trying to acquire chemical
and nuclear weapons. How much truth is there in such reports?
OSB: I heard the speech of American President Bush yesterday (Oct 7).
He was scaring the European countries that Osama wanted to attack with
121
weapons of mass destruction. I wish to declare that if America used

chemical or nuclear weapons against us, then we may retort with
chemical and nuclear weapons. We have the weapons as deterrent.
HM: Where did you get these weapons from ?
OSB: Go to the next question.
HM: Demonstrations are being held in many European countries against

American attacks on Afghanistan. Thousands of the protesters were non-
Muslims. What is your opinion about those non-Muslim protesters ?
OSB: There are many innocent and good-hearted people in the West.
American media instigates them against Muslims. However, some good-
hearted people are protesting against American attacks because human
nature abhors injustice.
The Muslims were massacred under the UN patronage in Bosnia. I am

ware that some officers of the State Department had resigned in protest.
Many years ago the US ambassador in Egypt had resigned in protest
against the policies of President Jimmy Carter. Nice and civilized are
everywhere. The Jewish lobby has taken America and the West hostage.
HM: Some people say that war is no solution to any issue. Do you think
that some political formula could be found to stop the present war ?
OSB: You should put this question to those who have started this war.
We are only defending ourselves.
HM: If America got out of Saudi Arabia and the Al-Aqsa mosque was
liberated, would you then present yourself for trial in some Muslim
country ?
OSB: Only Afghanistan is an Islaamic country. Pakistan follows the
122
English law. I don’t consider Saudi Arabia an Islaamic country. If the

Americans have charges against me, we too have a charge sheet against
them.
HM: Pakistan government decided to cooperate with America after Sept

11, which you don’t consider right. What do you think Pakistan should
have done but to cooperate with America ?
OSB: The government of Pakistan should have the wishes of the people
in view. It should not have surrendered to the unjustified demands of
America. America does not have solid proof against us. It just has some
surmises. It is unjust to start bombing on the basis of those surmises.
HM: Had America decided to attack Pakistan with the help of India and
Israel, what would have we done ?
OSB: What has America achieved by attacking Afghanistan ? We will

not leave the Pakistani people and the Pakistani territory at anybody’s
mercy.
We will defend Pakistan. But we have been disappointed by Gen Pervez

Musharraf. He says that the majority is with him. I say the majority is
against him.
Bush has used the word crusade. This is a crusade declared by Bush. It is
no wisdom to barter off blood of Afghan brethren to improve Pakistan’s
economy. He will be punished by the Pakistani people and Allaah.
Right now a great war of Islaamic history is being fought in

Afghanistan. All the big powers are united against Muslims. It is ‘ sawab
‘ to participate in this war.
HM: A French newspaper has claimed that you had kidney problem and
had secretly gone to Dubai for treatment last year. Is that correct ?
123
OSB: My kidneys are all right. I did not go to Dubai last year. One
British newspaper has published an imaginary interview with
Islaamabad dateline with one of my sons who lives in Saudi Arabia. All
this is false.
HM: Is it correct that a daughter of Mulla Omar is your wife or your

daughter is Mulla Omar’s wife ?
OSB: (Laughs). All my wives are Arabs ( and all my daughters are
married to Arab Mujahideen). I have spiritual relationship with Mulla
Omar. He is a great and brave Muslim of this age. He does not fear
anyone but Allaah. He is not under any personal relationship or
obligation to me. He is only discharging his religious duty. I, too, have
not chosen this life out of any personal consideration.
124
,ysxnb
mtv ,y
my
New Dawn
y m
,
vr
hsdx hxyrz
vyb
iv
,yn
yh
PUBLICATIONS
vn i v
,vl
NewDawnPublications@gmail.com
s
,y
r-
b
yy
li r
v
vgn i -v s
t hv / ra

Dajjaal Reduced

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dajjaal Reduced

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Muhammad and James

Mikhah Ben David

Mikhah Ben David

Common Responses To This Claim…

My response was as follows:

“Mullah `Umar the Dajjaal ehehe thats a laff .”

Another response that I received was:

“The Taliban were a 5 year blink in the context of history. To aggrandize

“Claiming that Mullah `Umar is al-Masîh ad-Dajjâl (“The False

My response was as follows:

Secondly, to suggest that the Taliban is a PAST phenomenon is strangely

Another, more open-minded typical response I received was:

Another response, perhaps somewhere in between the former ones, was

corresponding online, who has not experienced something similar in

The Taliban are dodgy. End of story.

Prophecy and Islaamic Eschatology

“And We made the Bani Isra’il (Children of Israel) to pass through

‫ﺳﺮَاﺋِﻴﻞَ ِﺑ َﺒﻨِﻲ َوﺟَﺎ َو ْزﻧَﺎ‬ْ ِ‫ﺤ َﺮ إ‬ ْ ‫ن َﻓَﺄ ْﺗ َﺒ َﻌ ُﻬ ْﻢ ا ْﻟ َﺒ‬

“The Hour is near, and the moon is cleft asunder.” Al-Qur’aan,

Nevertheless, when did the prophecy of “The moon has split”

Obviously it would not have been “old magic” in Muhammad’s time to

situation, most of his followers had already migrated to Madinah (a

The Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire suffered a massive defeat at the

“Condemned are the works of Aboo Lahab, and he is condemned.

cutting their hair.

The first Aayah was revealed at a time of the Muslim’s weakness,

Qur’aan: “It is He who has sent the Rasool (Messenger) with

Christianity, Judaism, paganism have never regained any lasting

Prophecies of this Age

Notes: Az-Zanjani, Aqa’id, p. 255

“Camels will no longer be used as a means of transport; People will

“Very tall buildings will be built.” This one is perhaps an

“Allaah will send a disease to fornicators that will have no cure.” We

“Women will be wearing clothes but not wearing clothes.” The

Notes: Aboo Dawood 24

2. There are two types of indications and signs:

1. The appearance of Al-Yemani (the Yemenite)

Bihaaru-l-’Anwaar page 254, volume 52

perhaps the most impressive – and otherwise unprecedented – of

Can any change be anticipated in the things predicted?

Hastening the Rise

Bihaar, vol. 52 - 117 105

1. That the mainstream view of the 12th Imaam of Shi’ite theology

The following sayings of Imaam can be put forward as a third example

Ja`faru-s-Saadiq relates that “The wrath of Allaah, on Bani Israel was

When it is evident that alterations are possible in re-appearance so also

Bihaar vol. 52, pg 251

Positive indications mean those which are willed by God so un-

Bihaar, vol. 52, pg 151-250

The Last Hour

παιδια, εσχατη ωρα εστιν, και καθως ηκουσατε οτι αντιχριστος ε

These prophecies have unmistakably been fulfilled, and are being

εν τουτω γινωσκετε το πνευμα του θεου: παν πνευμα ο ομολογει ι

“O Ahlu-l-Kitaab (People of the Scripture)! Do not exaggerate in

οτι πολλοι πλανοι εξηλθον εις τον κοσμον, οι μη ομολογουντες ιη

This is an important point my Brothers and Sisters! Who was John

The Only Conclusion

περι ου γενομενου μου εις ιεροσολυμα ενεφανισαν οι αρχιερεις κ

“And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that

ανεβην δε κατα αποκαλυψιν: και ανεθεμην αυτοις το ευαγγελιον

κενον τρεχω η εδραμον.

had only hateful and arrogant words:

“But from those who were reputed to be important (whatever they

“And when James, Cephas, and John, those who seemed to be