Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The State.
2.
on
the
statement
of
(Complainant)/
30,
Okara
which
was
dismissed
on
3.
a).
That
the
accused/petitioner
is
absolutely
c).
consent
of
her
parents
and
present
d).
e).
f).
g).
h).
i).
PRAYER:
Under
the
circumstances
and
facts
Petitioner
Through:
CC No.PLH-42288
CERTIFICATE:
As per instruction of the petitioner
this is the 1st petition on the subject matter.
ADVOCATE
Crl. Misc:____________/B/2012
Muhammad Saif
Vs.
I N D E X
Sr.
Description of Documents
No.
1.
Grounds of Petition
2.
Annexure A Certified copy of FIR
Alongwith its better copy.
3.
Annexure B Copy of MLC
4.
Annexure-C & D Copies of Bail petition
with order of learned Magistrate
5.
Annexure E & F Copies of bail petition
And order of ASJ.
6.
Annexure-G Copy of FIR no.365/2007
7.
Dated
Pages
20.07.12
1.03.12
1-5
6
29.02.12
29.03.12
7
8-11
09.05.12
12-14
03.10.07
15
Power of Attorney
Petitioner
Through:
CC No.PLH-42288
CC PGW-18925
Crl. Misc:____________/B/2011
Muhammad Waseem
Vs.
I N D E X
Sr. No. Description of Documents
1.
Grounds of Petition
2.
Annexure A Certified copy of FIR
Alongwith its better copy.
3.
Annexure A Certified copy of Order
Passed by ASJ, Gujranwala.
4.
Vaklatnama
Dated
Pages
1-4
5
6-9
10
Petitioner
Through:
Vs.
1.
That the local police has been registered the above captioned
case against the peititoner and want to arrest the petitioner in
the above case is concocted one.
2.
That is to certify that this is the 1st application of grant of prearrest bail on the behalf of the petitioner in this Honble Court
That the story setup in the crime report is vague and without
any basis and the same is neither plausible, tenable and
acceptable nor is the same appeal able to any reason or logic.
4.
That the bail petition of co-accused Saif Ullah Sakar had been
granted by the learned Judicial Magistrate dated 02.07.2012
and the impugned order is attached.
5.
would
advance
case
the
not serve
of
any purpose
prosecution,
except
or
his
case
would
tantamount
to
punishing
absconsion
or
tempering
with
the
prosecution evidence.
j).That the petitioners are ready to furnish reasonable
surety for his attendance in this Honable Court as well
as in any other trial Court on each and every date of
hearing in the like amount to the entire satisfaction of
this Honble Court that this Honble Court may order.
i).That other available grounds will be agitated at the
time or arguments.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
Verified on Oath at Lahore this 13 th day of July,
2012 that the contents of the above affidavit are true and correct to
the best of knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed
therein.
DEPONENT
C. M No.
/2012
IN
W.P. No.
Muhammad Arshad
/2012
Vs.
SDPO etc.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
P R A Y E R;
It
is,
therefore,
very
humbly
and
Petitioner
Through:
C. M No.
/2012
IN
W.P. No.
Muhammad Arshad
/2012
Vs.
(STAY APPLICATION)
SDPO etc.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
Verified on Oath at Lahore this 9th day of
July, 2012 that the contents of the above affidavit are true and
correct to the best of knowledge and belief and nothing has been
concealed therein.
DEPONENT