The Chaos That We Paid ForThoughts While Watching Media Coverage of Occupy Wallstreet

The average American citizen watching evening news is stunned at the amount of political violence that we are seeing on Wall
Street and our university campuses. This political violence may be telling us that we are seeing the breakdown of society, or
the core and seeds of the new revolution that Thomas Jefferson suggested the nation might need in its future. If its the later,
whose revolution is it? Are we experiencing a correction which the indignant populous is demanding? Has the need arisen for
a correction in the course of the federal government where they have forgotten who serves whom? Why is there this sort of
turbulence and what is its root?
These questions which spur study of this recent political awakening could be a good thing, with conditions. It is a good thing if
in keeping with the customs and conduct our Constitution and Bill of Rights have laid down since our founding. The wild
conduct in the streets if it contributes something of value that is able to merge with our sacred documents from our Founders,
otherwise if not, then from where have all these demonstrators come from what sounds like 'Marxism'? The answer seems
implied or hidden behind a camouflage of words, which is a typical known and slick Marxist tactic from his Jesuit "white-isblack, black-is-white" training (http://www.newfoundations.com/GALLERY/Loyola.html , II. "Theory of Knowledge").
Diluted ideals mask crafty and academic rhetoric and enjoy reduction to slogans or just plain lies. Attempting to understand
roots of that, have us to search for sources. One also should be aware that many of our colleges and universities are teaching
the privileged that their prosperity has been stolen from the proletariat members of our society and around the world.
What also has been sounding like class warfare, which is generally foreign to our democratic customs, and is more redolent of
the class-stratified 'old world'. For example, in the USA virtually anybody if they can afford, can buy a first class ticket. Those
prospering class warfare have the philosophy that the bourgeoisie rich must overcome their environment by sharing what
they had stolen from the working class, such as what Dickens wrote in A Christmas Carol using the character Marley's ghost.
Of late, weve been hearing the activists' slogans virtually mindlessly declare statements the "rich" for example, must pay
higher taxes, which is what the very wealthy before Wilsons Administration spurred the masses to demand to obtain the
Income Tax Act. Granted, if the Bush era tax breaks lapse to the Clinton era tax brackets, the government would come closer
to having significantly improved its revenue stream.
Meanwhile recognizing the flipside, since WWII we have engaged in aggressive forms of corporate social control some
characterize as over-regulation which have attempted to or appear to reign in corporate personhood, power and agency
abuses.
The Old-world Marxist, Jesuit influenced sorts have a preference for rabble-rousing; those practices and policies have rooted
in new world, but have polluted the ground and spurred erosion far from the liberated Republic our founders left us. Perhaps
because the current activist effort seems too confused, relativistic and collectivist, Thomas Jefferson's offhanded remark that
one day the United States may need another revolution appears to have taken root in compost rather than a fine flower bed of
vigilant individual liberty in a commercial framework of what had been non-corporate private enterprise.
Indeed, the reader also may be surprised to know that the origin of highly polished, atheistic Jesuit-Marxism that were
watching and hear used on our streets and around much of the world, also is used in school texts in the USA. This white-isblack, black-is-white rhetoric is cleverly mingled with anti-private enterprise propaganda all from within our own free, United
States of America. With our own open arms, sometimes by ballot, we have welcomed these very patient calculating
subversives to hijack words in our dictionaries but not having our definitions. Thus the words in the discourse that we think we
are hearing have to be parsed because politically correct word games and slick double-speak are an appendage of bigger
political games, which are serving as part of the destruction of the United States of America.
Meanwhile, natural concerns arise with American parents who have hocked the house to educate several college grads.
Typically, many parents pay the tuition bills for their children before sending them into the world. Wed allowed our children the
freedom to explore and grow in their own talents until the world sees them as we do, very special. We proudly encouraged
them to explore just about every occupation their degree allows. Our hopes were based on our own experiences and means

of communication in the relatively free economic society of our time. We parented what we thought were duplicates of
ourselves and we were sure that our children could do no harm.
When the bill-payer challenges the demonstrator, however, the responses are virtually never satisfying. The parent is likely to
conclude that the child is majoring in sloganeering rather than an academic curriculum. The evidence is clear; our academic
communities often are indoctrinating- a Jesuit tactic and practice, rather than educating our children. Then, one day we are
watching the evening news and we see our very special child among the disheveled demonstrators who were defying
uniformed security personnel at a down town office building. And that evening we learn that lawyer's fees are almost as
expensive as a college degree. Not our child! How did our child become what sounds like a flaming Marxist Young-gen?
Moreover, how could those in positions of governmental, cultural, social and academic authority ie, they, have injected some
form of control, even a domination throughout our society, appearing to have hijacked our children? They push a button and
debt-bearing, educated lemmings come running...
With that societal domination, what has happened between our front doors, the education for which we paid for our children,
and THEN in thinking of the Big Picture, the door to the offices of the corporate world and one has to wonder its personnel
directors? As it were, who hired the Personnel Director? How do THEY fill companies in those buildings and the whole system
with such as these who seem to be hijacked by neo-Marxists? This is how all of this is sounding like Marxism (most people
only see that, rather than understanding the Jesuits' order which is disorder and its asymmetric war on the US). And in the
unraveling, we'd seen the effect of the 'Wall-Street'-Washington connection as a component prospering the global corporates,
which have employed many of those same affected personnel directors.
A review of some history will help give us insight. In the middle of 19th Century Germany, Herr Marx (recall that according to
the Jesuits, Marx was trained by Jesuits) was a new political philosopher on the scene who could easily turn words into
violence in the turbulent societies in that war ridden era, geographically now among the consolidated German states in which
the Vatican was backing more powerful states attempting to find its new secular sovereign for Holy Roman Empire. Fearing
constant insurrections and mob violence which had been happening over that period of time, the authorities warned that social
unrest which Marx and his group had perpetrated would get them invited to leave Germany; Jesuits often likewise were
ejected from countries they were attempting to subvert for the purpose of achieving the Vatican's Holy Roman Empire
expansion ( http://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Richards.pdf
Ernst Haeckel and the Struggles over Evolution and Religion, p.95. Germany ejects the Jesuits, which vindicate with the
subsequent Pope. Germany's new emperor William II (1888-1918) had conflicts with Chancellor vonBismark (1890) and
Germany begins its ascent into achieving the Vatican's contemporary secular state for 'Holy Roman Empire'. See also
http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=jesuits, - Jesuits and Their Strategy to Destroy Britain, Section: "Jesuits and the
Two World Wars"). Given what was happening across central Europe at that point however, and its own problems with shifts
in its old feudal, exploitative, compromised and confused ways, Marx's dedication to his new philosophical bent proved too
deep for a mere warning from the authorities. The same thing happened in France where the Marx family society tried to
radicalize seminary students (http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=67314 Jesuits and Communism).
Because his philosophy encouraged violence, the French government deported Marx et al to more liberal, Victorian England.
There the Marx philosophy found Edward Bibbins Aveling (who in 1886 co-authored the first English translation of Das
Capital), a like-minded radical who had traits the Marx family admired. Aveling was a brilliant, capable, leftist organizer who
was labeled an anarchist in British and American print. He was a highly skilled dissembler, and with his adroit lies, he could
easily sway audiences. As Marx's daughter, Eleanor, also sadly learned, he could attract women.
Although English by birth, Aveling felt no loyalty to the Monarchy. He preached atheism and generally diminished the character
of Britain. He would say whatever his audience wanted to hear, and flatly, it did not take long for his audience to realize that
Aveling loved to make promises based in lies. As it were, Aveling's intelligence and cunning strengthened the presentation of
Marxism. He founded many side-organizations such as ethical humanist societies, with names and functions purposed to
confuse the opposition.

By sheer luck meanwhile, Marxist agitators where in Britain when Queen Victoria called for some sort of reasonable
democratic reforms. With that political move to the Marxist advantage, Aveling was able to achieve some access to the British
political process. It was through these changes that the left now had power to enforce his and Marx family ambitions.
Probably under Jesuit influence, one of these organizations Aveling founded in the 1890s in England was the Fabian Society.
Named for Roman general, Fabius Maximus, Maximus had been known for using those sorts of attrition tactics for which that
Roman general successfully waged against Hannibal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Society). Aveling used the name
most likely because its cadre would serve as a connected, well positioned but insidious and gradually divisive element from
within; the Fabians were quite effective in recruiting middle and upper class university students, who likewise generally
diminished the character of Britain.
Aveling recruited the Fabians among the university social clubs. An example of this is portrayed in the 1983 British film
Chariots of Fire which has a scene that takes place in a gymnasium at Cambridge where the Abrams character was sitting at
a piano playing Gilbert and Sullivan melodies. Above and behind the piano is a banner for the Fabian Society. In this scene a
debate is taking place in 1919 between the melee-mouthed Fabian recruiter and a young aristocrat. He was asking the Fabian
why he didn't serve the King or was unwilling to serve the King in the Great War. The Fabian recruiter responded with a
flimsy comment, referring to the home front.
The point is made that the Fabian social power protected its recruits in that particular case war however, we now see that
by 1919 Fabianism had taken on a life of its own. Moreover, recall that the writing of two famous British authors, Dickens and
George Bernard Shaw described a characteristic of the modernizing old world - 'class-struggle' in virtually sclerotic,
class/socially stratified Britain, decrying terrible working conditions over there and in Europe in general at that time.
Not without valid complaints, these modern Fabians moving about in the English-speaking world were a part of the early,
loosely organized Marxist system. Early leaders were, without their conscious knowledge -- fertile ground like children
inculcated with Jesuit influenced, Fabian socialist ideals. The clever trick was to use childrens natural idealism and ignorance
that also were natural weaknesses into which Aveling played. For example regarding children, the so-called Greek Civil War
after Jesuit/Vatican spawned WW2 (See also http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=jesuits, - Jesuits and Their Strategy
to Destroy Britain, Section: "Jesuits and the Two World Wars"), which took place on the northern border of Greece in what
bordered Albania, Bulgaria, and Yugoslavia, was not a war for territory, but a war for stealing Greek children and young
people.
When American author Nicholas Gage was 7 years of age, his mother Eleni rescued her children and helped their escape. A
communist firing squad captured and executed Eleni, described in Gage's 1980's era book and movie, Eleni. In part as a
result of Greece's open repatriation policy, those thousands of stolen children who were trained as communist insurgents, and
their counter-parts to the technocrat "Austerity" sorts are today on the streets of Athens during the economic upheaval in
Greece, reputed by Greek sources.
Jesuits and their trained insurgents are using Marxist-Hegelian dialectic strategies, and plan far in advance to foment
instability in targeted societies to serve motives beyond the demonstrations seen by the naked eye. German domination
interests of late, meanwhile which are characterized by their demand for fiscal union to stabilize the economies of EU
countries like Greece and Spain, would be used as a reason to quell the demonstrators demands, or the flip-side to serve as
the solution the demonstrators would demand to embrace.
Here the potential is that insurgency birthed a century before in what were principalities now incorporated into Germany, along
with the Vatican, are potentially contributing to costing Greece and other European countries their respective sovereignty.
Certainly sadly with a Concordat with the Vatican, the Greek Orthodox Church may have put Greek sovereignty at risk. In
earlier times with the Vatican which continued its interests to remain the dominant religion, and later the Rothschilds, their
sponsored insurgencies and in the larger context wars were used for kingdom-towing ie, taking over countries and giving
that land to the victor. Today using somewhat different methods but often with insurrection, we see similar transfers attempted.
This remains a tactic and sadly our 1% are part of this funding with their means and for their family-owned companies; the old
Kaiser era 'cold-war' remains a way the 1% here and royals abroad enjoy voters' wallet ride while they're lining up their ducks
for another region of valuable resources to 'kingdom-tow' with subversive tactics, 'hot-spots', needs for 'peace-keeping', or
some other contrived crisis. In Britain the attempts were under way for social and civil power transfers by the Secular Society

with its free-thought movement which also included Aveling among its members. He edited for the The Freethinker a secular
humanist magazine established in Britain. After affiliating with this group, in 1881 he interviewed the great scientist Charles
Darwin in which Darwin's son, Francis also was present. In that interview, Aveling pressed the question of Darwin's 'faith'.
Darwin repeated each time that he was an 'agnostic'. Aveling lied in his notes that Darwin was an atheist. Darwin's son,
Francis, exposed this lie in a footnote he added to his father's notes. Aveling's lie from that interview had served to give power
to the beliefs of Evolution, which in a Europe affected by reductionist, survival-of-the-fittest sociological filters, Evolution would
become elevated to the level of natural laws, theories like gravity or of physics such as thermodynamics. The conjecture of
Evolution however does not survive those tests and hurdles to be deemed as achieving scientific theory. The fossil record
similarly fails to support Evolution as a true scientific theory. Notwithstanding, with the help of manipulative minds like Edward
Aveling, the success of Marxism prospered in the West, also taking more root in the US with its large influx of Germanic
immigrants. After the Marxists' great success in unionizing the coal mines in England after WWI, the British generally
attempted to reject Marx and this philosophy although the British upper class saw socialism as way to control resources and
society by the appearance that socialism was looking out for those of the weaker strata in that society. Thus it was the Coal
Board after WWII that formed the nucleus of the freely elected socialist (which had its seeds in Marxism) government in Great
Britain. Because of support by the Old Worlds elite layer, Marxism's patience is one of the characteristics of its success; it is
then enabled to plant recruits and wait as much as a century for the harvest. Even before Marx's death, with a strong source
of funds coming from the United States where there was a group which formed the Socialist Labor Party of America (SLP)
established in 1876 as the Workingmen's Party, of Marxist-socialist ideology it could be said it was finding some root in the
US http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Labor_Party . Much of their rhetoric came out of the American Midwest
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_American where a large number of immigrants from German regions had settled. The
Midwest was an 'expansionist' area; except in some pockets of urban areas, Marxism couldn't take the same hold in what had
been the 13 Original States of the Union. Chicago served as the center, but led to a split in Marxs form of socialism. The
violent portion of the philosophy worked with the 'proletariat'-like lower classes among those recent immigrants who were
feeling disenfranchised and in dangerous and marginal jobs, while the Fabians actively recruited the bourgeoisie, ie, the
Middle class. Working conditions anyway generally had eroded in England and US, with little to protect employees from
abusive managements and owners and increasing amounts of 'fascism'. This in the US was by the family owned companies
which after the US Civil War and foreign moneyed interests enjoyed assess to and protection by the public weal. Abroad that
was natural in monarchies and associated feudal societies, whereas in the US, this was a clash to the Republic under the
broken Constitution, but increasingly a self-interest demanded by the wealthy commercial families in the US contrary to the
interests of all other voting, land-owning Americans). Meanwhile Aveling's double-speak was so clever with hidden meanings
and political intent, that some American newspapers were absolutely recruited into Marxs Germanic, turbulent version of
socialism. By the end of the 19th century after Aveling had come to the States, however, he had fallen gravely ill with Eleanor
nursing him to health. His amoral mind could not let him keep a promise to marry her; meanwhile he still had a wife in England
from whom he was estranged. In 1898 in spite of years of relationship with Eleanor, Aveling married a show girl. The betrayal
led Eleanor to suicide.
At this point in time Marxism had leadership and management deficits. The family members were dead, the primary leadership
was in shambles, and when Aveling's internal infection returned, there was no Eleanor to nurse him. Aveling had died
however, by the time John Dewey, known for eroding the quality of education, and his angry socialist beliefs would begin to
get traction. Moreover, sharing in the socialist philosophy with Dewey was a noted physician, chemist and art collector Albert
C. Barnes.
A baseball analogy will help some older readers understand the simultaneous events taking place in politics, society, and
commerce. Every sports fan enjoys watching the disciplined team effort that brings screaming fans to their feet. Despite
individual talent, sharp speed and well-trained motion, a star athlete however, is only as good as his teammates will allow.
The exception to a team's possession of a single gem is a sports team having a collection of stars such as the turn -of-the
Twentieth Century, Chicago Cubs infield, Tinker who was at Shortstop, Evers who was at 2nd base, and Chance at 1st base.
The efforts of these three ball players formed a record setting double play combination that sparked their team to five World
Series victories. There it is - talent and teamwork http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_to_Evers_to_Chance .
See the combination in this way: from the wave into the US mid 19th century of feudalist, old-world immigrants, a number of
whom were Germanic, Catholic (40% of Germany even today is Catholic and many of its Royals also are Catholic), were
certainly sympathetic to the Marxist and socialist cause in that same period. These perhaps were staffing the radical fringe of

big-city newspaper editors, which happily were printing original class-warfare material that could be read by transplanted
Europeans then living in the American Midwest.
The context did not matter, the content however did, and had the same Tinkers to Evers to Chance combination: developing in
government, in society and in commerce were found a similar, but Jesuit- Marxist-Fabian, political games playing combination
in Aveling, Dewey and Barnes. Dewey was an angry educator whose 'Progressive Education' plan was mocked as ineffective,
and characterized as Special Education for college level students. This John Dewey (not the father of the Dewey Decimal
System) was a bitter leftist whose goal would use any means to institute his pragmatism plan for American education, in
which he'd crafted a flimsy, insubstantial body of material that barely taught reading, writing and arithmetic but was
championed as progressive. This Americanized form of socialist-Marxist philosophy and those who followed it were known as
Pragmatists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatism), who believed in the compromise of principles and truth.
By design, Deweys plan would produce people ineffectively educated to read and handle complex subject matter and
sophisticated mathematics, meanwhile indoctrinating them into an updated version of Marxism, to the point that some
educators once labeled Pragmatism as garbagism. Given its generations of entrenchment however, the result is what few
educators today have the nerve to say, Pragmatism equals "dumbing-down".
Reagan Administration Cabinet level, Charlotte Eserbyt (daughter of a 'Bonesman' another name for a member of Yales Skull
and Bones secret society) authored "Dumbing Us Down", helps with that most likely Jesuit influenced effort to erode the
quality of public education, and also was a way to encourage parents to send their children to Parochial schools for further
Catholic inculcation. Even during the supposedly conservative Ronald Reagan's Administration, with George Bush as his Vice
President who when President cut funding to Head Start, and Knight of Malta CIA Director William Casey, this 'dumbingdown' erosion of the quality of US education was ramped-up. In turn, in the past 4+ generations, the dynamic growth of
'Pragmatism is a systemic planned obsolescence that has corrupted virtually every body of knowledge and profession,
science, communication, commerce and especially politics.
This short commentary describes nearly a century of indoctrination in our society in general, and our schools in particular. In
examining society to find answers, one must understand what has happened and is happening in the schools. For years
questions have arisen about whom? How? Or When? How and when topics of these sorts are discussed on conservative talk
shows, letters to the editor and a few from the conservative wing of politics. These so-called conservative constituents were
suddenly troubled by a large cadre of what seem to be talented political hijackers who, ignoring the Constitution have emerged
in what we thought was our relatively pristine America.
One could draw their own conclusions however, the United States of America has been eroded by Jesuit intrigue wielding front
ends such as Fabian/progressive socialism and its more violent, leftist form found in Marxism, as well as corporate socialism,
aka fascism- another Vatican influence.
Meanwhile the US has exported both for more than a century. Both are of the welfare sorts to the left of what the founders left
us under the Constitution before 1859, and neither are self-sustaining for our republic because were not keeping what the
Constitution had left us and the Founders by that.
Slowly, patiently (Jesuit strategies of 'laying-low') with both campaign contributions and our own tax-money, these for-sale,
leftist sleepers' were buying our political parties, one after another, jerry-mandering safe voting districts. It was only a matter
of time before political hijackers owned most of the federal tax-paying voters votes. Eventually voters sent 51% of freerider/'free-lunch' minded politicians to Washington D.C. and our state capitols; these leftists of both the social and corporate
welfare sorts meanwhile have been looting the kiddy.
Moreover, presented under other names and modified out of its original political and economic context with regard to
socialism, the Jesuit-Marxist philosophical influence has been exerted in our society and used openly as the method of
teaching in many American schools of higher learning. Again only under different names, eventually it also found its way down
through all grades in compulsory education. The popular title today for it is Progressive or outcome-based education.
Indeed, everyday in our schools the quality at all levels the system has deteriorated and been eroded by design. Dewey went
to the source by embracing socialist-populist versions of Marxism with the Aveling additions as a tool for Dewey's end. After

finishing college and into his early teaching career, he associated himself with the philosophies of Eleanor Marx and Edward
Aveling with the intention of merging the developing of his Progressive Education with the moderations of Marxism sprouting
in the US.
For example, by using a tactic called Adjunct Professors with funds provided by off campus sources, started just after the
turn of the Twentieth Century this education strategy also was occurring in other English speaking countries.
With regard to the Tinker to-Evers-to-Chance analogy, although separated by time, the third member of this 'infield' is Barnes,
whose foundation employed Dewey and provided the funds for Dewey's inspiration. Barnes is known for inventing ARGYROL,
a Venereal Disease prophylactic chemical. First used by the French army, it later was used by all the Armed Forces on the
Western Front in WWI. Barnes' fortune came from the French buying ARGYROL, and the means from that allowed him to
express his taste in French Impressionist art, until he had purchased the largest private collection of French Impressionist
paintings in the world, now known as the Barnes Collection. The most likely German influenced, Philadelphia art community
however, viciously rejected the collection, which left him embittered.
In other cases similar to Barnes foundation prospering Deweys Progressive Education, John D. Rockefeller and Rockefeller
family foundations had a General Education Board (beguiled by the Vatican, Rockefellers also established the National
Council of Churches and the World Council of Churches to give the Vatican stronger hold in the US and around the world).
With its limitless resources, its mission and aim for their interests was and remains to use docile people who would yield
themselves to be molded. According to Gary Allen in The Rockefeller File, Gates added from the Boards Occasional Paper
No.1, The present educational conventions fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will
upon the grateful and responsive rural folk.
The foundations of the very wealthy - Rockefellers, Carnegie, Ford with significant amounts of money in the early 30s began
supporting Jesuit influenced, Marxist Deweys dysfunctional, flimsy education framework in many urban and rural areas of the
US. Meanwhile, wealthier families and Catholics would be disinclined to have their children educated in the public schools,
preferring better quality education or at least fundamental education offered in tuition based and parochial education.
In support of this articles co-author, Gary Allen also observed that traditionalist teachers resisted Dewey-ism. Backed by
foundations however, prominent universities such as Columbia, Chicago, Pennsylvania, and Stanford formed research and
experimental stations purposed to suborn American education, upset the American system, and supplant it with a socialist
state.
These foundations also backed National Education Association "NEA", which began to throw its weight behind Deweys
program. This included Progressive Education textbooks produced for nationwide use to address the decentralized school
system in the US. NEAs 1934 report stated that A dying laissez-faire must be completely destroyed and all of us, including
the owners, must be subjected to a large degree of social control (Gary Allen, 1976- The Rockefeller File, pg46). Per Allen,
Congresss Reese Committees investigation of foundations reported that indeed, something in the nature of an actual
conspiracy among certain leading educations (in the US) to bring about socialism through the use of our school systems. In a
strange irony, Barnes invented ARGYROL as a sexual prophylactic; where then is the academic prophylactic for today's
children, students and even society who have been abused by Dewey's Pragmatism, and funded by very wealth, probably
Jesuit influenced Americans. Barnes' wealth paid for the likes of Dewey's Adjunct strategy, and funding from sympathetic
sources gave Dewey and Dewey-ism significant admission to virtually any campus in America and providing socialist/softball
Marxist materials into the US education system. As planned obsolescence goes in the use of plan to render something into an
inferior form or condition, in time this Dewey-Fabianistic strategy eroded the schools but also eroded US commerce, its hiring
practices, managers and its Human Resource Directors. With the help of the wealthy and elite, that socialist-Marxist material
spread, and had been changing governments and commerce around the world including our own. At the present time the
wealth redistribution charades slickly postured in the socialist/Marxist influenced apparatus were seeing, has been and is
being prospered also by corporate profiteers, policy makers and social engineers all obsessed for control who think our lives
and resources are their final victory. Its a system that denies God and erodes the quality of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness for everyone. To the contrary however, God told Daniel this "King of fierce countenance" is broken without hand
by the appearing of the Lord Jesus Christ. The corrupted system that throws away any opportunity for its victory, God
vanquishes it for liberty that glorifies His NAME. He is the 'prophylactic' that our children, students, and society desperately
need. Psoras, Andrea 2012/2013

Subsequent to co-authoring this article with one of my loved ones, he began encountering A GREAT DEAL of harassment
through the WIFI, such as visions of people and foul, creepy dreams. Most people are ignorant that WIFI is hack-able.
Although I'd already encountered a great deal of aggressive targeting by the Intelligence Apparatus and the Jesuits, that in
exposing the corruption eroding the quality of education and life in the US, it had not occurred to me that my family would be
harassed and targeted.
In 1981, the Lord had me come across the witness and biography of Dr. Alberto Rivera, a former fairly high ranking Jesuit the
Vatican used in the 60s to infiltrate and compromise Evangelical Christian ministries in Roman Catholic countries in Latin and
South America. Most people also would not understand the Bush/Skull-Bones/Jesuit ascendance, their use of SMOM Bill
Casey as Reagan's CIA Director who further connected the CIA and US Intelligence with the Vatican, and Reagan's Concordat
with the Vatican under the agenda that it would break the Soviet Union and the 'Cold War'. Constance Combey's authored her
book, "Hidden Colors of the Rainbow", during Reagan's First Administration. What she was observing were the leaves on the
tree of Jesuit entrenching with its Intelligence Apparatus connection and shortly after the Vatican Concordat with the US during
Reagans's first term, and thus increased Jesuit access now via and using the US Intelligence apparatus. The Jesuit use of
'black' occult, along with its use anyway by US Intelligence with its Psychological operations, but all of this gained further
traction. In time more aggressive targeting began against minorities, now including additional white ethnic groups that the
Vatican wanted to punish and oppress. This included Greeks and people leaving Catholicism for 'protestant' denominations
and evangelical, or Pentecostal Christianity. GHW Bush meanwhile after having been Gerald Ford's CIA director would
become Reagan's Vice President. Virtually if not all secret societies are co-opted or controlled by the Jesuits and their occult
interference. As it were, Skull/Bones interests are dominated by Jesuit interests. I've said that Skull/Bones and those anyway
from secret societies and our NSA, CIA established using high level Catholic Nazis, etc are all zombies for the Jesuits and
their White-is-Black and Black-is-White inculcation and dissociation. Increasing amounts of discrimination have ensued, while
throughout all of American Society, government, regulation, environment increasing 'planned obsolescence' has ensued. All of
this also reflects the 4th Reich's asymmetric ie commercial and cultural war it vowed at the 1944 Red House Strasbourg
meeting to continue to wage (Lebor. Mail on Line, 9May09, "Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a
Fourth Reich ...in the EU").
We've needed to repeal the US Concordat with the Vatican. Perhaps we also should revoke Georgetown's charter as well as
revoking all charters to every Jesuit college and university. We perhaps also should withdraw funding and state support for
every catholic hospital, as well as revoke the Catholic education system are require all students in the US to have public
education. Similar to the orthodox which send their children to after school education programs in that religion and those
languages, but certainly remove all state support for religious institutions as many 'denominations' and other religious groups
in the US receive no direct backing by federal government. Even understanding "United Way" giving, is to understand state
support for religious works often cloaked in charity.
We must consider what will help eject Jesuit and Vatican influence, as far as to shut the NSA and CIA, in addition to repealing
the Concordat with the Vatican. Europe's problems are rooted in Vatican interests and its use of Germany as its contemporary
secular state to attempt domination again by Holy Roman Empire. We need to understand the elephant in the room and how it
has contaminated a great deal of our society, our civil institutions and what had been the Republic, which the Vatican and
Jesuits hated and assassinated Lincoln to destroy it and the Constitution. The US 1% were babes in the woods for Jesuit
occult. That our wealthy were co-opted by Jesuit tactics to achieve Jesuit ends isn't a mystery, but that they need to repent so
that they too can get liberty is part of the real battle that we must wage.