Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
190 / Tuesday, October 2, 2007 / Notices
data from eight states. FNS proposes to
conduct four data collection activities:
Interviews with State CN and Medicaid
agencies; survey of LEAs; administrative
data collection from LEAs and State
agencies; and telephone interviews with
LEAs. Without the data FNS will not be
able to assess the effectiveness of NSLP
direct verification, and FNS will not be
able to disseminate information about
DV–M implementation to assist agencies
that do not currently use DV–M.
Description of Respondents: State,
Local, or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 364.
Frequency of Responses:
Recordkeeping; Report: Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 379.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–19439 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0120; FV–07–331]
Notice of Request for Extension and
Revision of a Currently Approved
Information Collection
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), this notice
announces the intention of the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to
request an extension for and revision to
a currently approved information
collection in support of the Regulations
Governing Inspection and Certification
of Processed Fruits and Vegetables and
Related Products.
DATES: Comments may be submitted on
or before December 3, 2007.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS:
Contact Terry B. Bane, Processed
Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
STOP 0247, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0247; fax (202) 690–1527; or e-mail
‘‘terry.bane@usda.gov’’.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Title: ‘‘Regulations Governing
Inspection and Certification of
Processed Fruits and Vegetables and
Related Products—7 CFR 52’’.
OMB Number: 0581–0123.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:35 Oct 01, 2007 Jkt 214001
56047
Expiration Date of Approval: February
29, 2008.
Type of Request: Extension and
revision of a currently approved
information collection.
Abstract: The Agricultural Marketing
Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621—et seq.)
(AMA) directs and authorizes the
Department to develop standards of
quality, grades, grading programs, and
other services to facilitate trading of
agricultural products and assure
consumers of quality products which
are graded and identified under USDA
programs. Section 203(h) of the AMA
specifically directs and authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to inspect,
certify, and identify the grade, class,
quality, quantity, and condition of
agricultural products under such rules
and regulations as the Secretary may
prescribe, including assessment and
collection of fees for the cost of the
service. The regulations for such
services for processed fruits and
vegetables and related products may be
found at 7 CFR Part 52.
AMS also provides other types of
voluntary services under the same
regulations, e.g., contract and
specification acceptance services,
facility assessment services and
certifications of quantity and quality.
Grading services are available on a
resident basis or a lot-fee basis.
Respondents may request resident
service on a continuous basis or on an
as-needed basis. The service is paid for
by the user (user-fee). The AMA and
these regulations do not mandate the
use of these services; they are provided
only to those entities that request or
apply for a specific service.
In order for the Agency to satisfy
those requests for service, the Agency
must request certain information from
those who apply for service. The
information collected is used only by
Agency personnel and is used to
administer services requested by the
respondents. The information request
requires personal data, such as, name of
the product, name and address of the
packer or plant, location of the product,
type and size of containers, and
designation of services requested.
Affected public may include any
partnership, association, business trust,
corporation, organized group, and State,
County or Municipal government, and
any authorized agent that has a financial
interest in the commodity involved and
requests service.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.05 hours per
response (1124 total hours divided by
21,068 total annual responses).
PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
Respondents: Applicants who are
applying for grading and inspection
services.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,437.
Estimated Number of Responses:
21,068.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 0.07.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1,124.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Mr. Terry B.
Bane, Processed Products Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, STOP 0247, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0247; fax (202)
690–1527; or e-mail
‘‘terry.bane@usda.gov’’.
All comments received will be
available for public inspection during
regular business hours at the same
address.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Dated: September 27, 2007.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–19418 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Newspapers Used for Publication of
Legal Notice of Appealable Decisions
for the Northern Region; Northern
Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and
portions of South Dakota and Eastern
Washington
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
02OCN1
 56048 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 2, 2007 / Notices
SUMMARY: This notice lists the
newspapers that will be used by all
Ranger Districts, Forests, Grasslands,
and the Regional Office of the Northern
Region to publish legal notices for
public comment and decisions subject
to appeal and predecisional
administrative review under 36 CFR
215, 217, and 218. The intended effect
of this action is to inform interested
members of the public which
newspapers will be used to publish
legal notices for public comment or
decisions; thereby allowing them to
receive constructive notice of a
decision, to provide clear evidence of
timely notice, and to achieve
consistency in administering the
appeals process.
DATES: Publication of legal notices in
the listed newspapers will begin with
decisions subject to appeal that are
made on or after October 1, 2007. The
list of newspapers will remain in effect
until another notice is published in the
Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Acting Regional Appeals Coordinator;
Northern Region; P.O. Box 7669;
Missoula, Montana 59807. Phone: (406)
329–3381.
The newspapers to be used are as
follows:
Northern Regional Office
Regional Forester decisions in
Montana: The Missoulian, Great Falls
Tribune, and The Billings Gazette.
Regional Forester decisions in
Northern Idaho and Eastern
Washington: Coeur d’Alene Press and
Lewiston Tribune.
Regional Forester decisions in North
Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.
Regional Forester decisions in South
Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.
Beaverhead/Deerlodge NF - Montana
Standard.
Bitterroot NF - Ravalli Republic.
Clearwater NF - Lewiston Tribune.
Custer NF - Billings Gazette
(Montana).
Rapid City Journal (South Dakota).
Dakota Prairie Grasslands - Bismarck
Tribune (North and South Dakota).
Flathead NF - Daily Inter Lake.
Gallatin NF - Bozeman Chronicle.
Helena NF - Independent Record.
Idaho Panhandle NFs - Coeur d’Alene
Press.
Kootenai NF - Daily Inter Lake.
Lewis & Clark NF - Great Falls
Tribune.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Lolo NF - Missoulian.
Nez Perce NF - Lewiston Tribune.
Supplemental notices may be placed
in any newspaper, but time frames/
deadlines will be calculated based upon
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:35 Oct 01, 2007 Jkt 214001
notices in newspapers of record listed
above.
Dated: September 25, 2007.
Kathleen A. McAllister,
Deputy Regional Forester.
[FR Doc. 07–4847 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–807]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip from the Republic of
Korea: Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Review and Intent To
Reinstate Kolon Industries, Inc. in the
Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 14, 1996, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) revoked in part the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip (PET film) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea) with respect to subject
merchandise manufactured and
exported by Kolon Industries, Inc.
(Kolon). See Polythylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from the Republic
of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Notice
of Revocation in Part, 61 FR 58734
(November 14, 1996) (Revocation). As
the result of an adequate allegation from
domestic interested parties in this
proceeding, the Department, pursuant to
section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), is now
conducting a changed circumstances
review to determine whether Kolon has
resumed dumping PET film and
whether the antidumping order should
be reinstated for PET film manufactured
and exported by Kolon. See Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film Sheet and Strip
from Korea, 72 FR 527 (January 5, 2007)
(CCR Initiation). We preliminarily
determine that Kolon has sold PET film
at less than normal value (NV) and that
the order on PET film from Korea
should be reinstated with respect to PET
film manufactured and exported by
Kolon. We will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
liquidation of all entries of PET film
manufactured and exported by Kolon
and entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register.
PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 5, 1991, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on PET film
from Korea. See Antidumping Duty
Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film
Sheet and Strip From Korea, 56 FR
25660 (June 5, 1991). On November 14,
1996 , the Department revoked the order
with respect to Kolon after having
determined that Kolon sold the
merchandise at not less than normal
value for a period of at least three
consecutive years. See Revocation. The
three administrative reviews forming
the basis of the revocation are the June
1, 1992 through May 31, 1993, review;
the June 1, 1993, through May 31, 1994,
review; and the June 1, 1994, through
May 31, 1995, review. The final results
of the June 1992 through May 31, 1993,
and the June 1993 through May 31,
1994, administrative reviews were
published on July 5, 1996. See
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film Sheet
and Strip from Korea; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Notice of Revocation in Part
61 FR 35177, (July 5, 1996) (Second and
Third Final Results). The final results of
the June 1994 through May 31, 1995,
administrative review were published
on November 14, 1996. See Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
from Korea; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Notice of Revocation in Part
61 FR 58374, (November 14, 1996)
(Fourth Final Results). Pursuant to 19
CFR 353.25(b) of the regulations in
effect at the time, and as part of its
request for revocation, on June 28, 1996,
Kolon agreed to immediate
reinstatement in the Order should the
Department conclude that subsequent to
the revocation, Kolon sold the subject
merchandise at less than normal value
(NV). (19 CFR 353.25(b) has been
superceded by 19 CFR
351.222(b)(2)(i)(B).) However, the
language in 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2)(i)(B) is
largely unchanged from 19 CFR 353.25.
See CCR Initiation at 530.
Due to allegations of resumed
dumping submitted by DuPont Teijin
Films (DuPont), Mitsubishi Polyester
02OCN1