Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concerning a Postnatural
Ecological Interface
So, nature
is
not a physical place to which one can go, nor a treasure to fence in or bank,
nor as essence to be saved or violated. Nature is not hidden and so does not need to be
unveiled. Nature
It is
is
not a
text to
who
is
Remember You
rat
meat machines
of survival
is
and
necessities
such
as,
for
and
such as ours.
To
cultivation
clarify,
it
exists.
water, food,
which
to the essential
life
all
richly
adapting environment
such as the animal organism, to bring forth environmental cultivation. This delicate ecological
interface requires symbiosis for the
other.
growth of either
side,
active participants in
maintaining the relationship through questioning the essence of the interface, deconstructing its
meaning, and cultivating new ecologies to promote the evolution of both animal organism and
environment. This system of maintenance will encourage a more developed and mutually beneficial ecological interface.
is
meaning without defining purpose by revealing enduring qualities (meaning), rather than
defin-
Questioning is the
mode
of interrogation we will
humans and
make use of
nature. This
is
truth, will
this interface
What is
the
meaning of such
a relationship, the relationship between animal and environment? Martin Heidegger's questioning of technology, in
ecological system.
end, or as a
way
of revealing.
The
different readings
of technology: as a means to an
refers to:
utilization
of equipment,
tools,
and
and ends
ogy
Technology
is.
...
instrumentum.
The
cording to which
itself
is
a contrivance,
what technol-
or,
in Latin,
an
it is
a means and a
human
activity,
can
means
to
an end
What
technology?
ask:
What
What
6).
to
its
Technology's purpose?
is
(Heidegger
is
essence.
To
It
what do such
things as
does technology bring forth? Technology brings forth not only objects,
but also the effects of the objects and the effects of the concept.
vealing.
What
"We must
objects,
and meaning,
rather than an
end. This brings us back to the essence of our ecological system. Technology is the interface of
our ecosystem;
ogy
How can
ecosystem?
this interaction
it is
it
be used
human organism and the environment; enframhuman and environment to form an assemblage in order to
transformation, and symbiosis. This assemblage of human and
nature
is
a system of interaction.
Technology
logue
is
is
the dialogue
between the
This dia-
the interface of a post-natural ecosystem; post-natural in the sense that current technoldualistic barriers
of naturalism.
humanity and
nature together by increasing their need for one another. As the technological interface of our
ecosystem advances,
humans
it
increases
for maintaining
its
on each
other.
This
rela-
in the
grow more and more dependent of each other, but the current relationship is not
How can dependency lead to integration in such a system, or rather how
mutually beneficial.
can
this
is,
the
human and
nature.
fully integrated
How can
this
am
referring to
advanced dialogue we
refer to as
is
it is
objectified
When
reduced
to a resource rather
itself
and
human
its
When nature is
survival.
In this
physical environment.
fetos
WJ *
4"
%-
r
I
new relationship
is
the
first
step to a
new
ecology, a
or rather integration with nature. This interface placed upon our ecosystem
is
is
nothing technological,
upon technology and decisive confrontamust happen in a realm diat is, on the one hand,
essence of technology and, on the other, funda-
essential reflection
tion with
it
akin to the
it.
(Heidegger 35)
this
May this realm be a new ecology, a new interface consisting of the integrated human or-
ganism and natural world revealing and questioning truth by enframing this instrument we
now
How do we cultivate new ecologies through challenging the current instrumentalized technological interface of our categorically separated ecosystem? We must conrefer to as technology?
tinually question
symbiosis.
To
ecological systems
is
to
and
ecologies.
langer, the
tioning we become.
(Heidegger 35)
more
brightly
new
Evidence
Question
Is it
More specifically, is an organism a concrete singuhow does solid matter disappear? If otherwise, what happens when the organ-
can be destroyed? If
it's
image
so,
lost?
Observations
-
The image of an organism lingers around after the death of the organism in
out.
out.
of nothing.
the
for
pending on circumstances.
Hypothesis
In
is
my observations
have determined that solid matter cannot be created out of nothing and in turn an organism
its
creator.
solid matter. I
my observations that
matter and motion
to operate.
ment.
is
a singular ele-
hold these two suppositions as the ingredients for the universe: matter or movement and space or motionless
vacuity. I then
tilings,
as
suppose that
all
now hypothesize
discourse,
that
matter
is all
is
matter,
and
is its
stage.
exists in the
exists in singular
vacuity of space.
it is,
singular form.
To clarify my
Procedure
-
Attempt
to destroy, that
is,
document
rid the
the
body from
motion of
body,
this universe,
organism's image?
its
by
its
solid matter.
What happens
to the
.**:
V*
'
'**
'v
JJ*~
/'
J
X
>
"^i
7*
-
&
V"
,-,
9WTV
-'
'
V
i
r
i
-
'$> *
***
/--I
v
1
=**.
/+
I
if
v -v \
'
--_
%
r.
*.
*'
>
\tJ
^
\^
^
m
*
'&
$0
m
-
'
*i
\
*-
v\
1*
'-
H
'
-x.A
v
*
.
V,'
<\Sfe
.'.
!**<*
.y
3vV.
Data
-
In the attempt of destroying the organism's body, the organism only rearranged
The
itself. It
enlargements of the experiments show that in parts of the body where the original image of the organism
it is left
as a mark;
to
(see enlargements.)
Each mark
image,
The
image,
The
(see
left
enlargements.)
space in which the organisms were flattened was direcdy affected by the transformation of the organisms'
(see
enlargements.)
Conclusion
"Etsi difficiile esse videtur credere
quicquam
enim fulmen
caeli
igni
permanat
calor
argentum penetraleque
'And yet
it is
lympharum
hard
frigus
rare superne."
The
shouts
in
fire;
hard gold
is
softened
by custom
as
water
by
silver,
poured
is
in,
we
feel
them both
Titus Lucretius
Cams
lines
487-496
The
written observations
An
Everlasting
Exemption of Decay
rebirth
Febjwaxg? 200%
Sixth
of
-*Natuxe*the.
3 kk want to
MM
*****
**
**
*
***
*/
**
* I
**'
*
***.
***
*
**
*
1
****?
r/
* **
** **
*
**
#..,
*****
***
*****
\)
**
h
h
...
n
*
j**
***
****
,#
**
* * *_
******
^-
** *
A* n
<f
j,
**
U)
**
t-
''I
r
*
**
?
I
t
'
BD!
2$%
m*.
'
QUESTIONING
TEKENOLOGY* as an envi
ronmental interface***
greeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen
* * * * * TEKENOLOGY*
******
then*now a system of r
evealing**creating the
metamorphosizing of re
ality. POLLUTION* our m
****** *ark
QUESTIONING
TEKENOLOGY* as an envi
ronmental interface***
F:
'
*?
4.
3BffltJ
m."
'
.*&
...-
"^'''>\di?
***
"5i*".
:
^>ggri
f
$?*
ii
f>wii
ss*
9gfiIdm328A aldEnobaauP