You are on page 1of 18

# E102 Using MATLAB in Feedback Systems

## Part I. Classical Design

Classical Control Design with MATLAB is illustrated by means of an example of the
design of a dc servomotor control system.
The transfer function of the dc motor is given by:
H(s) =

80
s(s 2 + 24 s + 48 )

## Our task is to design a PID controller

I
+ Ds
s
K (1 + j TD )(1 + jTI )
C ( j ) =
j
C ( s) = P +

or

to achieve the following specifications for the closed loop step response:
Rise time < 0.5s
Overshoot < 10%
We shall work through the following steps for the design:
A. Calculating the required open loop frequency response.
B. Determining the PID parameters.
C. Plotting the step response of the closed loop.
D. Fine-tuning the design to achieve the specifications

## A. Open Loop Frequency Response

First, we use the design specifications to calculate the natural frequency and damping
factor for the closed loop system. For a rise time tr = 0.5 s, overshoot Mp = 0.1 :
=> n = 3.6 rad/s
=> = 0.591
Now use the design relations from the lecture notes to specifiy the open loop crossover
frequency and phase margin:
=> 2c = 2n 4 4 + 1 2 2 => c = 2.60 rad/s

1 2n
=> m = tan
=> m = 1.02 rad
c

Anthony Bright

Page 1

04/ 18/ 02

## B. Determining the PID parameters

We will use a Bode plot to help select the controller parameters for the system. First we
will look at the frequency response of the dc motor.
You can write transfer functions in MATLAB by entering the numerator and
denominator polynomials of a rational transfer function as vectors of coefficients in
descending powers of s.
For example, to enter the dc motor transfer function given in the problem statement, you
would enter the numerator and denominator polynomials as two row vectors and define
the system as a transfer function model:
>>num=[80]; den=[1 24 48 0];
>>H=tf(num,den)
Transfer function:
80
------------------s^3 + 24 s^2 + 48 s

## The bode plot for the dc motor can now be plotted:

>>bode(H)

Anthony Bright

Page 2

04/ 18/ 02

The bode plot shows a crossover frequency of 1.4 rad/s. The crossover frequency must be
raised to 2.60 rad/s to speed up the time response.
First, find the magnitude and phase of the dc motor at the crossover frequency :
>>[magH,phaseH]=bode(H,2.60)
magH =
0.4117
phaseH =
-146.5225

At 2.60 rad/s, the combined phase of the controller and process must give a phase margin
of 1.02 rad (59o )
The phase lead added by the controller at 2.60 rad/s must be -180 + 59 +147 = 26o
( C ( j c ) = 0.44 rad) and the gain added by the controller at 2.60 rad/s must equal the
1
reciprocal of the dc motor gain C ( j c ) =
= 2.43 .
.412
We can now calculate the controller parameters, assuming that T I = 10T D by solving

## C ( j c ) = tan 1( c TD ) + tan 1 ( cTI )

2

C ( j c ) =

K 1 + 2c TD2 1 + 2c TI2

c
=> TD = 0.256 s ; => TI = 2.56 s
=> K = 0.780
So the PID controller is given by
2
(0.256 s + 1)( 2.56s + 1) 0.512 s + 2.20s + 0.780
C ( s) = 0.780
=

s
s

## >>num=[0.512 2.40 0.780];den=[1 0];C=tf(num,den)

Transfer function:
0.512 s^2 + 2.4 s + 0.78
-----------------------s

Now check the phase margin and crossover frequency of our design with the open loop
bode plot

Anthony Bright

Page 3

04/ 18/ 02

>>margin(C*H)

## C. Plotting the step response of the closed loop.

Now we check the closed loop behaviour of the system.
First find the closed loop transfer function Q(s):
>> Q=feedback(C*H,1)
Transfer function:
40.99 s^2 + 175.9 s + 62.42
-----------------------------------------s^4 + 24 s^3 + 88.99 s^2 + 175.9 s + 62.42

## The syntax of the feedback function is :

feedback(forward path transfer function, feedback path transfer function)
In our case we have unity feedback.

Anthony Bright

Page 4

04/ 18/ 02

Plot the step response of the closed loop system for 0 < t < 4 s
>>step(Q,4)

The step response meets the rise time requirement (< 0.5 s) but not the overshoot
specification (<10%)

Anthony Bright

Page 5

04/ 18/ 02

## D. Fine-tuning the design to achieve the specifications

You have found that the controller design did not meet design specs. We would like to be
able to try different values for the controller parameters and examine the results.

## %PID_tune M file to tune a PID controller

%
%Enter H(s)
num=[80];den=[1 24 48 0];
H=tf(num,den);
%Enter C(s)
P=2.20;I=0.780;D=0.512;
num=[D P I];den=[1 0];
C=tf(num,den);
%Plot closed loop step response
Q=feedback(C*H,1);
step(Q,4)

>> PID_tune

Anthony Bright

Page 6

04/ 18/ 02

## E102 Using MATLAB in Feedback Systems

Part II. State Space Design
We will carry out the same design as in Part I using State Space Methods.
The state space equations describing the dc motor are:
d
=
dt
d
= 4i
dt
di
= 24i 12 + 20v
dt
Our task is to design a state space control scheme to achieve the following specifications
for the closed loop step response :
Rise time < 0.5s
Overshoot < 10%
We shall work through the following steps for the design:
A. Entering the state space representation of the system.
B. Implementing full state feedback with pole placement.
C. Implementing full state feedback with optimal control.
D. Implementing feedback with a state observer

## A. State Space Representation of the System

Enter the state space matrices, with x = , u = v, y =
i
>>A=[0 1 0;0 0 4;0 12 24];B=[0 0 20];C=[1 0 0];D=0;
>>H=ss(A,B,C,D)
a =
x1
x2
x3

x1
0
0
0

x1
x2
x3

u1
0
0
20

x2
1
0
-12

x3
0
4
-24

b =

Anthony Bright

Page 7

04/ 18/ 02

c =
y1

x1
1

y1

u1
0

x2
0

x3
0

d =

Continuous-time system.

The command ss created a state space model of the system. We can now look at the
frequency response bode(H), step response step(H), and so forth, just as we did for the
transfer function models in Part I.
With full state feedback, the feedback gain can be evaluated using pole placement or the
LQR method.

B. Pole Placement
First determine the dominant closed loop pole positions.

What values of the dominant poles will give the appropriate time response ( <10%
overshoot, <0.5 s settling time => = 0.6, n = 3.6 rad/s)?

## Choose the remaining pole to be ten times as fast:

>>p=[-2.2 + 2.8j, -2.2 2.8j, -22];
Find the full state feedback gain to place these poles
>>K=place(A,B,p)
place: ndigits= 15
K = 3.6437
0.7756

0.1200

The command place matches the eigenvalues of the closed loop system matrix Af = A-BK
with the chosen poles. It also measures the number of digits accuracy in the position of the
closed loop poles.
Next, the reference gain Kr is determined
>>N=inv([A B;C D])*[zeros(length(B),1);1];
>>Nx=N(1:length(B));Nu=N(length(B)+1); Kr= Nu + K*Nx
Kr = 3.6437

The closed loop system can now be defined in state space form
>>Q=ss(A-B*K,B*Kr,C-D*K,D*Kr);

Anthony Bright

Page 8

04/ 18/ 02

>>step(Q)

## C. Optimal Control: LQR Method

First choose the weighting parameters of the performance index
>>Q=[10 0 0;0 0 0;0 0 0];R=.1;

This choice weights the motor angle with a factor of ten and the control input with a factor
of 0.1. Solve the linear quadratic regulator with Matlab function lqr
>>[K,S,e]=lqr(A,B,Q,R)
K =
10.0000
2.2273
S =
2.8273
0.3817
0.0500

0.3817
0.0774
0.0111

0.3267

0.0500
0.0111
0.0016

e =
-21.8628
-4.3360 + 4.2180i
-4.3360 - 4.2180i

Anthony Bright

Page 9

04/ 18/ 02

The values of the feedback gain vector K are the optimum values to minimize the
performance index. The matrix S is the solution of the associated Riccati equation and the
e vector contains the closed loop eigenvalues (poles). The closed loop response follows as
before
>>Kr= Nu + K*Nx
>>Q=ss(A-B*K,B*Kr,C-D*K,D*Kr); step(Q)

## Rise time 0.38 s, Overshoot 4%. This looks too easy!!

D. Observer Design
Full state feedback of the servo motor requires simultaneous measurement of motor
angular position, angular velocity and motor current. Typically all of these are not
measured. So we need to include an observer to estimate the state of the system. We will
choose the observer poles to be twice as fast as the system poles:
>>pe=2*e
pe =
-43.7256
-8.6720 + 8.4359i
-8.6720 - 8.4359i

## Now match the eigenvalues of Ao = A-LC with the chosen poles

>>L=place(A,C,pe)

Anthony Bright

Page 10

04/ 18/ 02

L =
1.0e+003 *
0.0371
-0.0329
1.3527

Note that the place function solves A-BK, so we need to invert the A and C matrices to
find the column vector L.
The observer gain L is now incorporated into an augmented state space description of
both the system state and the observer state:
>>Ae=[A -B*K;L*C A-L*C-B*K];Be=[B*Kr;B*Kr];
>>Ce=[C -D*K; 0 0 0 C-D*K];De=[D*Kr;D*Kr];

## The closed loop step response follows as before:

>>Q=ss(Ae,Be,Ce,De);
>>step(Q);title('LQR Design with observer')

The upper reponse curve corresponds to the measured output y = ; the lower curve to
the estimated output y = . Overshoot 4%, rise time 0.38s, the observer does an excellent
job!

Anthony Bright

Page 11

04/ 18/ 02

Before you come to the conclusion that the problem is solved and you can take the rest of
the evening off, you should just check the closed loop response of the other two state
variables, the motor speed and the motor current i. For example to find the closed loop
step response of the motor current, we change the output matrix:
>>C=[0 0 1];Ce=[C -D*K2; 0 0 0 C-D*K2];
>>Qi=ss(Ae,Be,Ce,De);step(Qi)

The motor current exceeds 4 amps for a short duration. This current level could burn out
the motor windings. We need to relax some of the design specifications and penalize
large values of current in our weighting matrix Q.

Fine tune the observer-based state space control scheme for rise time < 1.5 s,
overshoot < 10%, motor speed < 1 rad/s and motor current < 2 amps. The M-file
stspace_tune.m given on the next page may be helpful:

Anthony Bright

Page 12

04/ 18/ 02

## %stspace_tune M file to tune a state space controller

%
%Enter state space matrices
A=[0 1 0;0 0 4;0 -12 -24];B=[0 0 20]';C=[1 0 0];D=0;
H=ss(A,B,C,D);
% LQR design
Q=[10 0 0;0 0 0;0 0 0];R=0.1;
[K,S,e]=lqr(A,B,Q,R);
% Reference Gain
N=inv([A B;C D])*[zeros(length(B),1);1];
Nx=N(1:length(B));Nu=N(length(B)+1); Kr= Nu + K*Nx;
%Observer Design
% place observer poles
p=2*e; L=place(A',C',p)';
% closed loop state space form
Ae=[A -B*K;L*C A-L*C-B*K];Be=[B*Kr;B*Kr];
Ce=[C -D*K; 0 0 0 C-D*K];De=[D*Kr;D*Kr];
% Step Response
Q=ss(Ae,Be,Ce,De);step(Q)

Anthony Bright

Page 13

04/ 18/ 02

## E102 Using MATLAB in Feedback Systems

Part III. Digital Control Design
We continue the servomotor design with digital control. The transfer function of the dc
motor is given by:
80
H ( s) =
2
s( s + 24 s + 48)
We shall work through the following steps for the design:
A. Emulating the continuous design with a discrete PID controller
IT
D
C (z) = P +
+ (1 z 1 )
1
1 z
T
B. Implementing discrete state space feedback

>>fs=20;T=1/fs;

## Convert the analog PID settings to discrete form:

>>P=2.44;I=0.864;D=0.567;
>>Cz=tf([(P+I*T+D/T) (P+2*D/T) D/T],[1 -1 0],T)
Transfer function:
13.82 z^2 - 25.12 z + 11.34
--------------------------z^2 - z
Sampling time: 0.05

Notice that the addition of the sample time T to the transfer function command tf creates
a discrete time model of the PID controller.

Anthony Bright

Page 14

04/ 18/ 02

Now we convert the continuous process transfer function to the equivalent discrete
transfer function using the c2d (continuous-to-discrete) command applying a zero order
hold to the input:
>>Hs=tf(80,[1 24 48 0]);Hz=c2d(Hs,T,'zoh')

Transfer function:
0.001259 z^2 + 0.003814 z + 0.0006928
------------------------------------z^3 - 2.232 z^2 + 1.533 z - 0.3012
Sampling time: 0.05

Now we find the step response. The output of the system is continuous, but we can find
the sampled output from the discrete closed loop transfer function:
>>Qz=feedback(Cz*Hz,1);step(Qz);

If we compare this response to the results for the continuous control system (Part I), the
rise time is reduced slightly but the overshoot is increased.

Anthony Bright

Page 15

04/ 18/ 02

## B. Discrete State Space Design

The continuous state space equations for the system can be converted to discrete form
and state feedback strategies applied to the discrete system.
First find the equivalent discrete state model for the process:
>>A=[0 1 0;0 0 4;0 -12 -24];B=[0 0 20]';C=[1 0 0];D=0;
>>Hc=ss(A,B,C,D);
>>Hd=c2d(Hc,T,'zoh');
>>Bd=Hd.b
1.0000
0
0

0.0492
0.9586
-0.3426

0.0034
0.1142
0.2734

Bd =
0.0013
0.0690
0.5710

To apply the optimal control LQR method for the state feedback gain, choose the
weighting parameters of the objective function
>>Q=[10 0 0;0 0 0;0 0 ];R=0.1;

Now solve the discrete linear quadratic regulator with Matlab function dlqr
K =
8.4950
2.0222
0.3007
S =
61.7350
7.6247
1.0043
7.6247
1.5544
0.2236
1.0043
0.2236
0.0328
e =
0.7875 + 0.1689i
0.7875 - 0.1689i
0.3350

Anthony Bright

Page 16

04/ 18/ 02

## Now the reference gain is found:

>>Nx=N(1:length(Bd));Nu=N(length(Bd)+1); Kr= Nu + K*Nx
Kr = 8.4950

The observer is designed by pole placement. Choose estimator poles to be one half the
value of the system poles (making them about twice as fast in the discrete domain), and
solve for the estimator gain:
pe =
0.3938 + 0.0845i
0.3938 - 0.0845i
0.1675
place: ndigits= 15
L =
1.2769
7.0198
-3.3579

Write the augmented discrete state space equations for both the state variables and the
estimates of the state variables and plot the step response:
>>Q=ss(Ae,Be,Ce,De,T);step(Q)

Anthony Bright

Page 17

04/ 18/ 02

The response is practically identical to the results from the continuous state space system
and leaves open the same questions about the behavior of the other state variables.

Fine tune the observer-based digital state space control scheme for rise time <
1.5 s, overshoot < 10%, motor speed < 1 rad/s and motor current < 2 amps.
The following M-file may be helpful:

## %digi_tune M file to tune a digital state space controller

%
% Enter sample time
fs=20;T=1/fs;
% LQR design
A=[0 1 0;0 0 4;0 -12 -24];B=[0 0 20]';C=[1 0 0];D=0;
Hc=ss(A,B,C,D);Hd=c2d(Hc,T,'zoh');
Q=[10 0 0;0 0 0;0 0 0];R=0.1;
% Reference Gain