Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English Department
Supervisor:
Students:
Class:
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our very great appreciation to Mrs. Do Thi Thu
Trang, our research supervisor, for her patient guidance, constructive suggestions and
useful critiques of this research work.
We wish to thank second-year students of English Department for their
support and contribution to our questionnaire.
Finally, our grateful thanks are also extended to our classmates for their
enthusiastic participation in our pilot survey.
Abstract
We conducted this survey in order to determine the difficulties students may
face when conducting secondary research and how they overcome them. The subject
we focused on was second-year English majors at Hanoi University. To get the result,
a questionnaire was designed and fifty copies of it were delivered to students in about
a week. The data collected showed that the majority of students considered
Availability of printed materials and Reliability of online sources their biggest
difficulties. However, the responses suggested that the participants did come up with
some solutions to deal with these problems which were similar to those provided in
the questionnaire and they appeared quite effective. In particular, most of the students
chose Scheduling research tasks and Examining the reputation of publisher and the
author to be the best ways to cope with difficulties related to finding sources.
Additionally, the results pointed out that Paraphrasing was the most effective solution
to avoid making mistakes related to plagiarism.
Contents
Acknowledgments
Abstract
Contents
I.
Introduction
II.
Methods
III.
1.
Printed sources
1.1.
Level of difficulties
1.2.
1.3.
Solutions
2.
3.
11
Conclusion
12
IV.
References
14
Appendix
15
Introduction
Secondary research is an integral part of writing. It is stated that in the
information age, learning often involves research (Dietsch, 2006, p. 422). However,
many students still face a number of difficulties while collecting information for
secondary research and therefore, it is important to understand more about these
difficulties as well as how to resolve them. A book by Peterson (2000) introduced the
methods to obtain, evaluate and organize information for secondary research. Another
researcher, Dietsch (2006) offered a quite complete study on the same subject.
Nonetheless, these researchers only gave a general background of finding and using
sources in secondary research and did not focus on investigating the practicality of
these methods to university students. In our research, we mainly concentrate on
second year students of English Department at Hanoi University to find out what
difficulties they have when finding and using sources for secondary research and how
to overcome them.
II. Methods
In order to collect the data for our research, a questionnaire was considered as
the best tool to obtain a large amount of information in a short length of time. Our
questionnaire contained nine questions divided into three parts. The first part was to
identify the types of document that students use in their research. The second part was
to find out the difficulties as well as solutions to the difficulties students had while
finding sources for secondary research. Finally, the third part was to learn about the
methods used to avoid plagiarism, which was considered an ever-present problem at
universities (The problem of plagiarism, n.d.).
Before doing a real survey, we had a sample survey in our class for one day.
As we collected the questionnaires back, we realized a number of issues in part two
and three. After making several modifications, we had a complete questionnaire and
then conducted a real survey. In one week, we delivered questionnaire to fifty students
from three different classes. All of them are second-year English majors at Hanoi
University. Fortunately, all questionnaires returned were appropriate.
The next step is analyzing data. For every question with the exception of
question number 2, we counted the number of students choosing each option. This
number signified the popularity of an answer among the students. For question
number 2, we recorded the ranking each student gave to a number of options. Based
on the ranking, we would find out the level of difficulties.
III.
1.1. Findings of the level of difficulties students have when finding printed sources
Table 1
Level of difficulties
Difficulty
Time management
Availability
Relevancy
14%
61%
25%
11%
33%
53%
75%
6%
22%
Rank
Table 1 represents the level of difficulties that students faced when finding
printed materials. As can be seen, 61% of students working on printed sources agreed
that Availability of published documents was the greatest difficulty and Relevancy of
materials was chosen to be the second factor that hindered the process of gathering
data with 53% of the respondents. It is possible to infer that the majority of Hanoi
University students had trouble acquiring useful physical documents and were often
unable to obtain a sufficient amount of printed material needed for their research. On
the contrary, despite the fact 89% of students stated that they had spent two weeks or
more on gathering data when asked, Time management was the most popular choice
for the least difficulty, being chosen by 75% of the subjects. However, this result
contrasts to a previous study by Walker (1984), which deemed limiting the amount of
time spent on finding and reading articles and books to be the greatest difficulty.
Overall, it seems that students could well manage the time to complete the
assignments and meet the deadline.
1.2. Findings of the greatest difficulty with availability and relevancy of printed
sources
A: Insufficient amount
of material
B: Material being
borrowed
C: Excessive amount of
material
problem that was the materials needed have been borrowed by others. The situation
may commonly occur when several groups conduct research on the same topic.
There were 42% of students found that they could not develop their arguments
in the research further because of the shortage of materials. On the other hand, 5% of
the students pointed out an excessive amount of material as their main concern. These
two opposing ideas may be resulted from the chosen topics or different ways of
searching for information. Specifically, it would be more difficult to find suitable
materials for topics which are too general or related to unfamiliar matters.
Additionally, relying only on the sources of the library in campus without considering
other outside sources may be one of the reasons that students cannot find enough
information for their papers. Hence, students should apply proper methods so as to
keep the process manageable.
25%
50%
25%
0%
0%
22%
47%
31%
0%
0%
14%
50%
19%
17%
0%
0%
14%
36%
39%
11%
The table indicates students opinion about some solutions to the difficulties of
finding printed sources. As can be seen, scheduling research tasks and finding topics
with accessible sources were likely to be chosen as the effective ways to avoid getting
trouble in the gathering data process, with 75% backing up the former and 69%
agreeing and strongly agreeing with the latter. Surprisingly, both of the solutions did
not face any disagreement, which probably defends the suggestion that a schedule
should be made in order to have time spending on doing research well managed as
well as organize the works thoroughly to stay on track with the deadlines (Clouse,
2008). Moreover, Clouse (2008) also stated that there were some topics which were
not suitable for a research paper and should have been avoided.
On the other hand, while being supported by 64% of the students, 17% of the
total percentage did not consider a brief overview in library as a solution against
obtaining irrelevant material. Therefore, it can be assumed that although this
suggestion was helpful to the majority of students, there were still some who did not
share the same sentiment. In addition, there was not any student who strongly agreed
that asking librarians for information was helpful, whereas about 50% of them
showed disagreement including strong opposition (11%). The students opinion,
however, is not the same as one of Axelrod and Cooper stating that experienced
librarians were able to answer questions related to accessing materials (1991).
2. Findings of the greatest difficulty with electronic sources and methods
to evaluate electronic sources
10
11
12
Conclusion
On the whole, the majority of second-year students faced certain difficulties
when carrying out secondary research. Surprisingly, although Time management was
believed to be the greatest difficulty by previous researchers, it was actually
13
Availability which affected Hanoi University students the most. It was also indicated
that Reliability was the most challenged extent for those who chose to use online
materials. Moreover, most of the solutions suggested to deal with those obstacles as
well as to avoid plagiarism seemed to be effective. Nevertheless, it should be noted
that this study has examine only fifty students of English Department and we, the
researchers, were short on time and experience. Under the said circumstances, the
results might not be appropriate. Despite these limitations, our study has partly shown
current difficulties and ways of coping with these difficulties while conducting
secondary research of Hanoi University students. From these results that we have
found, another research of the effects of these difficulties on the students writing
processes and final products is necessary, since this point was not explained in our
research.
14
References
Appendix
Questionnaire
We are students of English Department, Hanoi University. This questionnaire
is being conducted as a part of our primary research. The purpose of this
questionnaire is to investigate the difficulties that second- year English major
students face when finding and using sources for the secondary research as well as
the ways they overcome them. We would be extremely grateful for your honesty in
answering these questions. All responses will remain anonymous. Thank you for your
cooperation.
I. Section 1:
1. What kind of sources do you use when conducting secondary research?
Please check the appropriate box(es). You can choose more than one option.
II. Section 2:
2A. Printed Sources
15
Solutions
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
16
III. Section 3
9. What do you do to avoid plagiarism?
Please check the appropriate box(es). You can choose more than one option.
Paraphrase
Summarization
Quotation
Others (please clarify: .)
17