You are on page 1of 2

38749

Rules and Regulations Federal Register


Vol. 72, No. 135

Monday, July 16, 2007

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER provisions of law as permitted by the disclosure of activity techniques; to
contains regulatory documents having general Privacy Act. No comments were protect the identities and physical safety
applicability and legal effect, most of which received in response to this notice of of confidential informants and of
are keyed to and codified in the Code of proposed rulemaking, so this final rule immigration and border management
Federal Regulations, which is published under adopts the proposed rule of July 27, and law enforcement personnel; to
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
2006, without change. ensure DHS’s ability to obtain
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by IDENT is the primary repository of information from third parties and other
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of biometric information held by DHS in sources; to protect the privacy of third
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL connection with its several and varied parties; and to safeguard classified
REGISTER issue of each week. missions and functions, including, but information. Disclosure of information
not limited to: The enforcement of civil to the subject of the inquiry could also
and criminal laws (including the permit the subject to avoid detection or
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND immigration law); investigations, apprehension.
SECURITY inquiries, and proceedings thereunder; The exemptions are standard law
and national security and intelligence enforcement and national security
Office of the Secretary activities. IDENT is a centralized and exemptions exercised by a large number
dynamic DHS-wide biometric database of Federal law enforcement and
6 CFR Part 5 that also contains limited biographic, intelligence agencies. In appropriate
[Docket No. DHS–2007–0044] unique identifiers, and encounter circumstances, where compliance
history information needed to place the would not appear to interfere with or
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of biometric information in proper context. adversely affect the law enforcement
Exemptions The information is collected by, on purposes of this system and the overall
behalf of, in support of, or in law enforcement process, the applicable
AGENCY: Privacy Office, Office of the cooperation with DHS and its exemptions may be waived.
Secretary, Department of Homeland components and may contain personally
Security. List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
identifiable information collected by
ACTION: Final rule. other Federal, State, local, tribal, Privacy, Freedom of information.
foreign, or international government ■ For the reasons stated in the preamble,
SUMMARY: On July 27, 2006 the DHS amends Chapter I of Title 6, Code
agencies.
Department of Homeland Security of Federal Regulations, as follows:
The Privacy Act requires each agency
published a notice of proposed
to publish in the Federal Register a
rulemaking to exempt portions of the PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
description of the type and character of
Automated Biometric Identification AND INFORMATION
each system of records that the agency
System (IDENT) system of records from
maintains, and the routine uses that are ■ 1. The authority citation for part 5
one or more provisions of the Privacy
contained in each system in order to continues to read as follows:
Act because of criminal, civil, and
make agency recordkeeping practices
administrative enforcement Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135,
transparent, to notify individuals
requirements. No comments were 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A
regarding the uses to which personally
received so this final rule adopts the also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B
identifiable information is put, and to also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
proposed rule of July 27, 2006, without
assist individuals in finding such files
change. ■ 2. Amend Appendix C to part 5 by
within the agency.
DATES: This final rule is effective August The Privacy Act allows Government adding a new section 4 to read as
15, 2007. agencies to exempt certain records from follows:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the access and amendment provisions. If Appendix C—DHS Systems of Records
Claire Miller, Acting US–VISIT Privacy an agency claims an exemption, Exempt From the Privacy Act
Officer, Washington, DC 20528, by however, it must issue a rulemaking to
telephone (202) 298–5200, or by make clear to the public the reasons * * * * *
facsimile (202) 298–5201. why a particular exemption is claimed. 4. The Department of Homeland Security
Automated Biometric Identification System
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By this rule DHS is claiming (IDENT) consists of electronic and paper
exemption from certain requirements of records and will be used by DHS and its
Background the Privacy Act for IDENT. Some components. IDENT is the primary repository
On July 27, 2006 the Department of information in IDENT relates to official of biometric information held by DHS in
Homeland Security published a notice DHS national security, immigration and connection with its several and varied
of proposed rulemaking to exempt border management, and law missions and functions, including, but not
portions of the Automated Biometric enforcement activities. These limited to: The enforcement of civil and
Identification System (IDENT) system of exemptions are needed to protect criminal laws (including the immigration
law); investigations, inquiries, and
records notice from one or more information relating to DHS activities
proceedings thereunder; and national
provisions of the Privacy Act because of from disclosure to subjects or others
ycherry on PRODPC74 with RULES

security and intelligence activities. IDENT is


criminal, civil, and administrative related to these activities. Specifically, a centralized and dynamic DHS-wide
enforcement requirements. This the exemptions are required to preclude biometric database that also contains limited
proposed rule would exempt certain subjects of these activities from biographic and encounter history information
records from the access and amendment frustrating these processes; to avoid needed to place the biometric information in

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 Jul 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM 16JYR1
38750 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations

proper context. The information is collected the subject of an investigation would alert the from one or more provisions of the
by, on behalf of, in support of, or in subject to the nature or existence of an Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
cooperation with DHS and its components investigation, thereby interfering with the and administrative enforcement
and may contain personally identifiable related investigation and law enforcement
activities.
requirements.
information collected by other Federal, State,
local, tribal, foreign, or international (e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
government agencies. Subjects) because providing such detailed effective July 16, 2007.
Pursuant to exemptions 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) information would impede law enforcement
of the Privacy Act, portions of this system are in that it could compromise the existence of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4); (d); a confidential investigation or reveal the Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy Officer,
(e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(5) identity of witnesses or confidential Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
and (e)(8); (f)(2) through (5); and (g). Pursuant informants. Security, Washington, DC 20528;
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), this system is exempt (f) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H) telephone 703–235–0780; facsimile:
from the following provisions of the Privacy (Agency Requirements), and (f)(2 through 5) 866–466–5370.
Act, subject to the limitations set forth in (Agency Rules) because portions of this
those subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (d), system are exempt from the individual access SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), and (e)(4)(H). Exemptions provisions of subsection (d) and thereby
Background
from these particular subsections are would not require DHS to establish
justified, on a case-by-case basis to be requirements or rules for records which are On January 18, 2007, DHS published
determined at the time a request is made, for exempted from access. notice of a new Privacy Act system of
the following reasons: (g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of records entitled ‘‘Redress and Response
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) Information) because in the collection of
Records System, DHS/ALL–005.’’ 1 The
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release information for law enforcement purposes it
is impossible to determine in advance what DHS Redress and Response Records
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or information is accurate, relevant, timely, and System maintains records for the DHS
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory complete. Compliance with (e)(5) would Traveler Redress Inquiry Program
violation to the existence of the investigation; preclude DHS agents from using their (TRIP), which is the traveler redress
and reveal investigative interest on the part investigative training and exercise of good mechanism established by DHS in
of DHS as well as the recipient agency. judgment to both conduct and report on connection with the Rice-Chertoff
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore investigations. Initiative, as well as in accordance with
present a serious impediment to law (h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
other policy and law. DHS TRIP will
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’ ability to obtain, serve, facilitate the public’s ability to provide
national security. Disclosure of the
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law appropriate information to DHS for
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the enforcement mechanisms that may be filed redress requests when they believe they
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or under seal, and could result in disclosure of have been denied entry, refused
evidence, and to avoid detection or investigative techniques, procedures, and boarding for transportation, or identified
apprehension, which would undermine the evidence. for additional screening by DHS
entire investigative process. (i) From subsection (g) to the extent that components or programs at their
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) the system is exempt from other specific operational locations. Such locations
because access to the records contained in subsections of the Privacy Act.
include airports, seaports, train stations,
this system of records could inform the Dated: July 5, 2007. and land borders. DHS TRIP will create
subject of an investigation of an actual or Hugo Teufel III, a cohesive process to address these
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation, to the existence of the
Chief Privacy Officer. redress requests across DHS.
investigation, and reveal investigative [FR Doc. E7–13576 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am] DHS TRIP will serve as a mechanism
interest on the part of DHS or another agency. BILLING CODE 4410–10–P to share redress-related information and
Access to the records could permit the facilitate communication of redress
individual who is the subject of a record to results across DHS components. It will
impede the investigation, to tamper with DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND also facilitate efficient adjudication of
witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection SECURITY redress requests. Once the information
or apprehension. Amendment of the records intake is complete, DHS TRIP will
could interfere with ongoing investigations Office of the Secretary
and law enforcement activities and would
facilitate the transfer of or access to this
impose an impossible administrative burden information for the DHS components or
6 CFR Part 5 other agencies that will address the
by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. In addition, [Docket Number DHS–2007–0047] redress request.
permitting access and amendment to such This system contains records
information could disclose security-sensitive Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of pertaining to various categories of
information that could be detrimental to Exemptions; Redress and Response individuals, including: Individuals
homeland security. Records System seeking redress or individuals on whose
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
AGENCY: Privacy Office, Office of the behalf redress is sought from DHS;
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential Secretary, DHS. individuals applying for redress on
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of behalf of another individual; and DHS
ACTION: Final rule.
information obtained or introduced employees and contractors assigned to
occasionally may be unclear or the SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland interact with the redress process.
information may not be strictly relevant or Security is issuing a final rule to amend No exemption shall be asserted with
necessary to a specific investigation. In the its regulations to exempt portions of a respect to information submitted by and
interests of effective law enforcement, it is new system of records entitled the collected from individuals or their
appropriate to retain all information that may representatives in the course of any
Redress and Response Records System
ycherry on PRODPC74 with RULES

aid in establishing patterns of unlawful


activity. from certain provisions of the Privacy redress process associated with this
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Act. Specifically, the Department System of Records.
Information from Individuals) because proposes to exempt portions of the
requiring that information be collected from Redress and Response Records System 1 72 FR 2296 (January 18, 2007).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 Jul 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM 16JYR1

You might also like