Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate falls prevalence, factors associated with falling, and the effects of balance and strengthening interventions on falls in
persons with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Design: Baseline and posttreatment data from a randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Community.
Participants: People with MS (NZ111) who use bilateral support for gait.
Interventions: Group and one-on-one physiotherapy.
Main Outcome Measures: Falls prevalence was assessed using retrospective recall. Demographic information was collected, impairments of body
function were assessed, and results from the Berg Balance Scale, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 version 2
physical and psychological scores, and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) were obtained.
Results: The prevalence of falls in a 3-month period was 50.5% among participants with MS, of whom 28% had more than 1 fall. Fallers had
a greater physical (mean difference, 3.9; PZ.048) and psychological (median difference, 4.5; PZ.001) impact of MS and a greater impact of
fatigue (mean difference, 9.4; PZ.002). A logistic regression analysis found that the MFIS score made a unique, significant contribution to the
model (odds ratioZ1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.018e1.079), correctly identifying 68% of fallers. A 10-week group physiotherapy intervention significantly reduced both the number of fallers (58.3% before to 22.9% after intervention, PZ.005) and the number of falls (63 before to
25 after intervention, PZ.001).
Conclusions: The prevalence of falls is high in this population of persons with MS, and the impact of MS and of fatigue is greater in fallers.
Development and evaluation of interventions to reduce falls risk and the transition to faller or multiple faller status are required.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013;94:616-21
2013 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
Falls are a significant problem for both the person who falls and
the health care system. At a personal level, falls can lead to pain,
injury, or fracture. This can lead to increased reliance on others for
assistance, fear of falling, and activity curtailment. At a societal
level, the medical costs of falls and fractures are great, as are the
costs incurred because of loss of income and increased care needs.
For people with multiple sclerosis (MS), the prevalence of
falls is estimated to be between 52% and 55% in retrospective
Presented to the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis,
October 1316, 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Supported by Multiple Sclerosis Ireland through the Getting the Balance Right Project.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting
this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors
are associated.
Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN77610415.
0003-9993/13/$36 - see front matter 2013 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.020
Methods
These data were part of the baseline assessments of 1 arm of an
exercise trial, the methods of which have been published previously.23 Participants were stratified according to their mobility, and
these data include people with MS who scored 3 or 4 on the Guys
Neurological Disability Rating Scale (GNDS) mobility section
(indicating use of bilateral aids for gait and/or occasional wheelchair use for longer distances). Ethical approval was obtained for all
the testing sites, and patients gave written informed consent.
617
Measures
A fall was defined as an unexpected contact of any part of the
body with the ground. Falls status was established by asking
2 questions: (1) Have you ever fallen? and (2) Have you fallen in
the last 3 months? If participants responded yes to the second
question, they were asked how many times they had fallen in the
last 3 months. Participants were asked retrospectively about the
number of falls in the 3 months before the baseline assessment.
They then received the interventions for a 10-week period and
were reassessed at week 12, during which they were asked about
the number of falls in the 3 months before that assessment.
At impairment level, lower limb sensation was evaluated using
a simple verbal numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no feeling
at all and 10 indicating normal sensation. Three areas of the lower
limb were tested bilaterally; thus a total of 60 indicated normal
sensation. Proprioception was assessed by placing participants
big toe in an up or down position and asking participants to
identify where their toe was. It was scored as either normal
or abnormal.
At activities level, balance was assessed using the Berg Balance
Scale (BBS), a 14-item clinical scale that evaluates balance in
sitting and standing and rates performance from 0 (cannot
perform) to 4 (normal performance). It has been demonstrated to
have good reliability24 and validity25 for people with MS. Walking
endurance was measured using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
This measures walking distance over a 6-minute period and is
a good predictor of habitual walking.26 Studies have suggested that
it is valid27 and reliable28 for people with MS. Subjects were
instructed to walk as fast and as safely as possible.29
At participation level, the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29
version 230 (MSIS-29v2) physical and psychological components
were used. The impact of fatigue was measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale31 (MFIS).
The data from the baseline assessments in week 1 were used in
this analysis.
Interventions
Participants were randomly assigned to take part in group physiotherapy, one-to-one physiotherapy, or yoga. All interventions
were for 1 hour per week for 10 weeks. The median number of
sessions attended was 8, 9, and 8 for group physiotherapy, one-toone physiotherapy, and yoga, respectively. The group physiotherapy intervention focused on a standardized program of
6 exercises designed to target both balance and strength, and is
outlined in the study protocol.23 One-to-one physiotherapy was at
the discretion of the treating therapist, but data gathered from the
treating therapists revealed that they also focused on exercises to
improve balance and strength. Data from the yoga instructors
suggested that they focused on relaxation exercises, meditation,
breathing techniques, stretching, and maintaining different yogic
postures and poses.
List of abbreviations:
BBS
GNDS
MFIS
MS
MSIS-29v2
6MWT
www.archives-pmr.org
Analysis
Data were coded and entered into an Excela spreadsheet and
imported into SPSSb for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used
to identify the prevalence of falls in the cohort. To assess any
significant differences between fallers and nonfallers for the
618
S. Coote et al
Discussion
The results indicate that 50.5% of participants reported a fall in
the last 3 months. This suggests a similar prevalence to population
studies in the United States that also found prevalences of 52% to
55%.1,3 Because our sample considered only those who use
walking aids, and since walking aid use in itself has been found to
be associated with falls in previous studies,2,5,14 this prevalence is
somewhat lower than expected. It is possible that the shorter
period in the falls question (3mo in this study as opposed to 6 or
12mo in previous studies) may account for this. We found that
Results
Of the 111 participants assessed at baseline, 81.1% (nZ90)
answered yes to the question have you ever fallen, and 50.5%
(nZ56) reported 1 or more falls in the last 3 months. Those
Table 1
Differences between participants who reported a fall in the last 3 months and those who did not at baseline
Characteristic
Fallers (nZ56)
Nonfallers (nZ55)
Age (y)
Sex (M/F)
GNDS mobility score 3/4
Time since diagnosis (y)
LL sensation (normal/abnormal)
Proprioception (normal/abnormal)
MSIS-29v2ephysical
MSIS-29v2epsychological
BBS
6MWT distance (m)
MFIS
55.610.4
17/38
33/23
16.65
27/25
34/20
549.5
19.5 (5.5)x
28.210
78 (41.5)x
46.714.1
54.711.1
23/32
33/21
14.13
31/23
37/15
50.310.8
15 (4)x
29.511
92.5 (49.5)x
3816.9
.586*
.116y
.858y
.561*
.452y
.551y
.048*{
.001z{
.879*
.174z
.002*{
www.archives-pmr.org
619
Intervention
Fallers Preintervention
Fallers Postintervention
P*
Py
28
16
7
5
11
9
3
2
.005*
.118
.125
.375
63
61
25
14
25
21
8
2
.001z
.088
.091
.131
(58.3)
(45.7)
(53.8)
(33.3)
(22.9)
(25.7)
(23.1)
(13.3)
Study limitations
Our data were obtained from people who volunteered for a clinical
trial of exercise interventions, rather than from a population study, as
is the case in the aforementioned studies. It is therefore possible that
our relatively small sample is biased toward those more predisposed
to exercise, possibly excluding those with significant activity
curtailment because of falls. Additionally, falls status was collected
using retrospective methods relying on patient recall over a 3-month
period rather than the more common 6-month time interval.
Prospective, diary-based methods with a minimum of monthly
reporting as recommended by the PROFANE network32 are recommended for future studies. Furthermore, we did not consider all
the factors that have been associated with fall statusdthere was no
measure of strength, spasticity, or of fear of falling, which may be
important. Nonetheless, the MFIS score alone correctly identified
68% of fallers. While group intervention reduced the number of falls
and fallers, it must be noted that our yoga and control groups had
620
low numbers because some participants were not treated as
randomized. Participants expressed a need for physiotherapy and
refused to be in the yoga or control groups. They were subsequently
randomly assigned to either group or one-to-one physiotherapy. This
introduces selection bias to the study, and it is therefore important
that this finding be confirmed by a larger study with a matched
control group. Additionally, a longer follow-up of the effect of
intervention on falls status is required.
Conclusions
Data from this study confirm the high prevalence of falls among
people with MS. Fallers report a significantly greater impact of
MS on their lives than nonfallers, reinforcing the importance of
addressing this complex issue. When considering the factors
associated with falls status, the impact of fatigue (MFIS score)
was the only variable in the final model correctly classifying 68%
of fallers. The odds ratios suggest that for every 10-point increase
in the MFIS score, there is a 10-fold increase in the likelihood of
reporting a fall for this population of people with MS who have
significant disability and use bilateral assistance to walk. The
relationship between fatigue and falls status warrants further
investigation. Preliminary data suggest that a group physiotherapy
intervention consisting of a 10-week balance and strengthening
exercise program can significantly reduce the number of fallers
and falls. This finding needs to be confirmed in studies with
a larger sample size powered to detect a reduction in falls, and
with a matched control group.
There is an urgent need for intervention trials that have the
primary aim of reducing falls, falls risk, and the transition to
becoming a faller. To appropriately design and evaluate programs, it
is essential that we fully understand the relationships between the
many factors that contribute to falls. To do this, prospective studies
incorporating a wide range of measures are required. Interventions
should then be developed based on those key factors and using the
perspectives of people with MS, clinicians, and health care providers.
Suppliers
a. Microsoft Excel; Microsoft, One Microsoft Way, Redmond,
WA 98052.
b. SPSS Inc, 233 S Wacker Dr, 11th Fl, Chicago, IL 60606.
Keywords
Accidental falls; Clinical trial; Multiple sclerosis; Prevalence;
Rehabilitation
Corresponding author
Susan Coote, PhD, Health Sciences Bldg, University of Limerick,
Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland. E-mail address: susan.coote@ul.ie.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Ireland for their
support in recruiting subjects for the study.
S. Coote et al
References
1. Finlayson ML, Peterson EW, Cho CC. Risk factors for falling among
people aged 45 to 90 years with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 2006;87:1274-9.
2. Cattaneo D, De Nuzzo C, Fascia T, Macalli M, Pisoni I, Cardini R.
Risks of falls in subjects with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 2002;83:864-7.
3. Marrie RA, Cutter G, Tyry T, Vollmer T. A cross-sectional study of
bone health in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2009;73:1394-8.
4. Kasser SL, Jacobs JV, Foley JT, Cardinal BJ, Maddalozzo GF.
A prospective evaluation of balance, gait, and strength to predict
falling in women with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
2011;92:1840-6.
5. Nilsagard Y, Lundholm C, Denison E, Gunnarsson LG. Predicting
accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosisda longitudinal
study. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:259-69.
6. Stevens JA, Mack KA, Paulozzi LJ, Ballesteros MF. Self-reported falls
and fall-related injuries among persons aged 65 yearseUnited
States, 2006. J Safety Res 2008;39:345-9.
7. Gibson J, Summers G. Bone health in multiple sclerosis. Osteoporos
Int 2011;22:2935-49.
8. Bazelier MT, van Staa T, Uitdehaag BMJ, et al. The risk of fracture in
patients with multiple sclerosis: the UK general practice research
database. J Bone Miner Res 2011;26:2271-9.
9. Bazelier MT, Bentzen J, Vestergaard P, et al. The risk of fracture in
incident multiple sclerosis patients: The Danish National Health
Registers. Mult Scler 2012;18:1609-16.
10. Moen SM, Celius EG, Nordsletten L, Holmy T. Fractures and falls in
patients with newly diagnosed clinically isolated syndrome and multiple
sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 2011;124(Suppl 191):72-82.
11. Cameron MH, Poel AJ, Haselkorn JK, Linke A, Bourdette D. Falls
requiring medical attention among veterans with multiple sclerosis:
a cohort study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:13-20.
12. Cattaneo D, Ferrarin M, Jonsdottir J, Montesano A, Bove M. The
virtual time to contact in the evaluation of balance disorders and
prediction of falls in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil
2012;34:470-7.
13. Prosperini L, Kouleridou A, Petsas N, et al. The relationship between
infratentorial lesions, balance deficit and accidental falls in multiple
sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2011;304:55-60.
14. Sosnoff JJ, Socie MJ, Boes MK, et al. Mobility, balance and falls in
persons with multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2011;6:1-5.
15. Matsuda PN, Shumway-Cook A, Bamer AM, Johnson SL, Amtmann D,
Kraft GH. Falls in multiple sclerosis. PM R 2011;3:624-32.
16. Matsuda PN, Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, Bombardier CH,
Kartin DA. Understanding falls in multiple sclerosis: association of
mobility status, concerns about falling, and accumulated impairments.
Phys Ther 2012;92:407-15.
17. DOrio VL, Foley FW, Armentano F, Picone MA, Kim S, Holtzer R.
Cognitive and motor functioning in patients with multiple sclerosis:
neuropsychological predictors of walking speed and falls. J Neurol Sci
2012;316:42-6.
18. Peterson EW, Cho CC, Finlayson ML. Fear of falling and associated
activity curtailment among middle aged and older adults with multiple
sclerosis. Mult Scler 2007;13:1168-75.
19. Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, Zocchi M, Regola A. Effects of balance
exercises on people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil
2007;21:771-81.
20. Smedal T, Lygren H, Myhr K, et al. Balance and gait improved in
patients with MS after physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept.
Physiother Res Int 2006;11:104-16.
21. Lord S, Wade D, Halligan P. A comparison of two physiotherapy
treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot
randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:477.
22. Esnouf JE, Taylor PN, Mann GE, Barrett CL. Impact on activities of daily
living using a functional electrical stimulation device to improve dropped
www.archives-pmr.org
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
www.archives-pmr.org
621
28. Paltamaa J, West H, Sarasoja T, Wikstrom J, Malkia E. Reliability of
physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with MS.
Physiother Res Int 2005;10:93-109.
29. Fry DK, Pfalzer LA. Reliability of four functional tests and rating of
perceived exertion in persons with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Can
2006;58:212-20.
30. Hobart J, Cano S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods.
Health Technol Assess 2009;13(12):1-200.
31. Fisk JD, Ritvo PG, Ross L, Haase DA, Marrie TJ, Schlech WF.
Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation
of the Fatigue Impact Scale. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18(Suppl 1):
S79-83.
32. Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, Becker C. Development of
a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the
Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc
2005;53:1618-22.