You are on page 1of 35

Petroleum Development Oman

UNRESTRICTED
October 2002

Document ID: PR-1522


Filing Key: EDMS

ProcedureforAnalysisofPipelineRoad
Crossings
Rev0

Keywords:
This document is the property of Petroleum Development Oman, LLC. Neither the whole nor any part of
this document may be disclosed to others or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

form by any means (electronic, mechanical, reprographic recording or otherwise) without prior written
consent of the owner.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Authorised for Issue:

Signed:
Robert Boulstridge
UEL - CFDH Pipelines

The following is a brief summary of the 3 most recent revisions to this document. Details of all revisions
prior to these are held on file by the issuing department.
Revision
No.
Rev 0

Date

Author

Oct 2002

TTP/1

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Scope/Remarks
New document

Page 4 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 5 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Contents
1.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
2.

INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................7
BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................7
PURPOSE.............................................................................................................................................8
DISTRIBUTION / TARGET AUDIENCE..................................................................................................8
STRUCTURE OF THIS DOCUMENT.......................................................................................................8
BUSINESS CONTROLS PROCEDURE..............................................................................................9

2.1
SCOPE.................................................................................................................................................9
2.2
OUTLINE PROCEDURE........................................................................................................................9
2.3
SELECTION OF SCREENING CURVE....................................................................................................11
2.4
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.........................................................................................................11
2.5
RELATED FORMS..............................................................................................................................12
ATTACHMENT 1: ROAD CROSSING APPROVAL FORM......................................................................................13
ATTACHMENT 2: ROAD CROSSING SCREENING CURVES .......................................................................... 14

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 6 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 7 of 31

PR-1522

1.

Introduction

1.1

Background

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

The passage of a vehicle over a buried pipeline will result in additional stress on the
pipeline. The international pipeline design codes recognise this and specific calculation
methods and allowable stress criteria are established to avoid the possibility of failure
under this condition. In general a pipeline will experience less stress from a passing
vehicle with increasing depth of burial.
PDO pipeline construction practice is to construct a windrow above a buried pipeline
with designated crossing points (without windrow) being established approximately
every 2 km along the route. PDO operations occur over an extensive area with thousands
of designated pipeline crossing points. Our ability to police these is low and the PDO
requirement for a minimum burial depth of 1.5 m at designated crossing points reflects
this.
The adoption of this depth of burial generally means that PDO pipeline crossings are
suitable for all but the heaviest of vehicles; the vast majority of which are under the
direct control of PDO e.g. rig moves and seismic vehicles.
Recent cost challenges have led to an occasional acceptance to adopt burial depths that
are less than normal PDO standards. In addition the increase of nearfield seismic
acquisition has led to a desire to create new temporary crossings at locations determined
by the logistics of seismic operations. The overall effect is an increasing need to verify
the acceptance of vehicle traffic over our existing pipeline systems.
In recognition of this trend, the PDO pipeline function commissioned a specialist
consultant to write a road crossing analysis software package called Roadcross. The
software was specifically written for PDO and rights for its distribution and use are also
owned by PDO. The programme was customised to analysis the effect of the most
common heavy vehicles experienced in PDO operations and runs on a Windows format.
The program checks the adequacy of the crossing design against ANSI B31.4 and ANSI
B31.8 requirements. The current version in use is v3.02.
Despite its relative ease of use, the program still requires a specialist pipeline
engineering background to ensure that it is used properly, and that its results are
interpreted correctly. UEL/1 has historically provided this service, although the pipeline
LDSC (Local Design Service Contractor) and other locally established Pipeline design
consultants registered under CC.7410 (Design Pipelines) are also authorised to run the
program.
The majority of proposed pipeline crossings are satisfactory. In an attempt to improve
the response time to queries on proposed new crossings, a number of generic curves
have been produced which are intended to be used by non-pipeline specialists for initial
screening of crossing locations of oil pipelines designed to ANSI B31.4 and Gas
Pipelines designed to ANSI B31.8. For multiphase lines, the gas pipelines curves shall
be used. If the curves indicate the proposed crossing is satisfactory then no further action
is required. If the curve indicates a potential difficulty then the issue should be referred
to UEL/1 or directly to the Pipelines LDSC for further action. Printing of the graphs
shall be done in colour in order to avoid mistakes in D/t curve selection.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 8 of 35

PR-1522

1.2

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is to describe the process to be followed in the assessment
of a vehicle in excess of 5 tonnes crossing an existing buried steel pipeline in PDO.

1.3

Distribution / Target Audience


The distribution and target audience of this procedure is PDO contract holders for heavy
vehicle movements and asset owners of pipeline systems.
All supervisory staff shall be responsible for ensuring that this procedure is strictly
adhered to, and understood thoroughly by their team members. If there is any doubt as to
the use of the screening curves, UEL/1 shall be consulted.

1.4

Structure of this Document


This document is structured as follows:

a description of the scope and brief summary of the steps involved

a matrix presenting the roles of the authorised and the responsible persons,

attachments providing the forms and screening curves to be used.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 9 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

2.

Business Controls Procedure

2.1

Scope
This procedure shall apply to crossings involving:

existing pipelines constructed from carbon-steel

vehicles in excess of 5 tonnes gross weight (i.e. with load).

It is noted that existing carbon-steel pipelines may experience corrosion over time and
that this would affect the capacity of a line to sustain external loading. The methodology
adopted in the generation of the screening curves allows for a degree of corrosion which
is generally within the type experienced in PDO.
This procedure does NOT apply to crossings involving:

non-metallic pipeline materials (e.g. GRE pipelines and GRE flowlines)

vehicles with a gross weight of less than 5 tonnes

points where the pipeline is already protected from vehicles loads e.g. reinforced
concrete slabs or culverts/casings

above ground pipelines and flowlines

It is noted that no analysis method is presently established for the assessment of nonmetallic pipeline materials and hence the only solution at present is to provide additional
load protection in the form of reinforced concrete slabs or culverts/casings, such as
detailed in the standard pipeline crossing drawings held by UEL/1. (E.g. drawing
numbers LNG-3-5911-16 or STD-2-4106-01 for temporary or permanent concrete slabs).
Alternative designs shall be formally approved by UEL.

2.2

Outline Procedure
The steps involved in implementing this procedure are as follows:

1. PDO person (originator) who requires his/her vehicle to cross an existing pipeline obtains the
following details for the line:
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
1.4.
1.5.
1.6.
1.7.

Start and finish point of line (e.g.. Sahmah Qarn Alam)


Service (oil & gas, oil, gas, water)
Nominal diameter (D)
Nominal wall thickness (t)
Grade of Pipeline Material (API 5L Grade B, X42, X52 etc)
Pipeline Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure (MAOP)
Depth of cover at proposed crossing point (i.e. distance from the crown of the line to the
level of the surrounding terrain)
The first 3 items (1.1-1.3) can usually be obtained from the pipeline marker plates
that are present every 1-km along a pipeline route.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 10 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings


The next 3 items (1.4-1.6) should be obtained from either the asset owner or the
TTO/1 pipeline integrity group via the PACER database. It is noted that the MAOP
is not the normal operating pressure of the pipeline and that care should be exercised
in confirming that the MAOP is obtained. (In many cases the MAOP is considerably
lower than the original design pressure)
The last item (1.7) can be obtained from the survey department who should have a
copy of the pipeline alignment sheets, including the as-built records. If the pipeline
was constructed in accordance with normal PDO standards (i.e. no shallow burial
waiver issued) then, in the absence of any specific data, a value of 0.7 m can be
assumed. If no additional load protection (e.g. slab) is required, the actual depth of
cover shall always be verified by hand digging.

1. Originator reviews the curves provided in Attachment 2 and selects the one most
appropriate to the proposed crossing. If the pipeline is for water only then the oil
curves shall be used. If the pipeline has a mixture of oil and gas then the gas pipeline
curves shall be used. The selected curve title should always have a higher vehicle
weight and higher design pressure than that which applies to the proposed crossing.
It should be noted however, that vehicles in weight category 20-50 tonnes tend to
impose a greater stress in the line than seismic vehicles, due to their axle
configuration and narrower tyres. Each type of vehicle must therefore be analysed
separately. A more detailed discussion on which curve to select is provided in 2.3
below.
2. Originator calculates the D/t ratio for the existing pipeline and plots the proposed
crossing condition on the selected curve, interpolating between the provided D/t
lines and the depth of cover. Reading across to the left hand axis allows the hoop
stress in the pipeline to be established.
3. The allowable hoop stress condition is shown on the right-hand axis. This depends
on the material grade and whether the line is considered to be oil or gas service.
4. If the hoop stress derived from the curves is LESS than the allowable stress then the
proposed crossing is acceptable. In this case the originator should complete the form
shown in Attachment 1 and forward to the asset owner representative for
endorsement.
5. If the hoop stress derived from the curves is greater than the allowable stress then
the originator should complete the form shown in Attachment 2 and forward the
details to UEL/1 or the authorised pipeline LDSC for more detailed consideration.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 11 of 31

PR-1522

2.3

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Selection of Screening Curve


It is of paramount importance that the appropriate screening curve is selected. To ensure
that this is the case the selection matrix shown below shall always to adopted:
Table1: Screening Curve Selection Matrix
Pipeline Service
Oil & Gas or Gas
Oil or Water

Vehicle Type
5 20 tonnes
20 50 tonnes
Seismic
5 20 tonnes
20 50 tonnes
Seismic

< 50
Att 2.1
Att 2.2
Att 2.3
Att 2.10
Att 2.11
Att 3.12

Pipeline Pressure (bar)


50 - 100
100 150
Att 2.4
Att 2.7
Att 2.5
Att 2.8
Att 2.6
Att 2.9
Att 2.13
Att 2.16
Att 2.14
Att 2.17
Att 3.15
Att 2.18

When printing the screening curves on hardcopy, this shall be done in colour, so as to
avoid mistakes in D/t curve selection.

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 12 of 35

PR-1522

2.4

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Roles and Responsibilities


A summary of the key roles and nominated delegates for this procedure are provided in
Table 2 below.
Table 2: List of Key Roles & Responsibilities
ROLE

Originator

RESPONSIBILITIES

Asset Owner
Representative

UEL/1

Pipeline LDSC

2.5

Obtain base data and determine calculated vs. allowable stress


using appropriate screening curve
Complete crossing proposal from and secure signature from
asset owner representative
Retain master copy of the fully signed crossing proposal form
Construct Crossing
Reinstate crossing and windrow to their orginal condition upon
completion of the work
Check appropriate curve has been used and that the crossing
stress condition is satisfactory
Endorse the crossing proposal form
Conduct detailed assessment of crossings that do not meet the
screening curve requirements.
Custodian of this Procedure
Conduct detailed assessment of crossings that do not meet the
screening curve requirements. Discuss any anomalies regarding
Roadcross v3.02 with UEL/1

Related Forms
The standard pipeline crossing form, which shall be used, is presented in Attachment 1.
The form shall be strictly adhered to by all indicated parties/authorities and be used for
the following purposes:

routing of the crossing proposal through different departments,

providing an auditable record,

recording of specialist advice,

authorisation by means of signatures

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 13 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 1: Crossing Acceptance Form


Input Data

Units

Actual Value

Pipeline Start & Finish point


Crossing Point

Km

Service (oil & gas, oil, gas, water)

oil & gas, oil, gas, water

Nominal diameter (D)

Mm

Nominal wall thickness (t)

Mm

Grade of Pipeline Material

Gr B, X42 etc.

Pipeline
Maximum Allowable Bar
Operating Pressure (MAOP)
Type and weight of vehicle

Tonnes

Depth of cover at proposed crossing


point (to be verified on site)

Metre

Screening Curve Results


Screening Curve used

Attachment

Estimated hoop stress

Bar

Allowable hoop stress

Bar

Approvals

Name

Ref ID

Signature

Date

Originator
Asset Owner Rep

Specific Roadcross Analysis Results (only conducted if the above results are unacceptable)
Units
Estimated hoop stress

Bar

Allowable hoop stress

Bar

Approvals

Name

Ref ID

Actual Value

Signature

Date

UEL/1
Pipeline LDSC

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 14 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.1: Gas Service,


Vehicle 5 - 20 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure < 50 bar

Max
allow able
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

450

D/t
80
60
400

40

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm 2)

20

350

347

API 5L-X70

300

297

API 5L-X60

257

API5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

Grade B

250

200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 15 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.2: Gas Service,


Vehicle 20 - 50 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure < 50 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

500

D/t
80
60

450

40
20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

400

350

347

API 5L-X70

300

297

API 5L-X60

257

API 5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

Grade B

250

200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 16 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.3: Gas Service,


Vehicle = Seismic
Pipeline Pressure < 50 bar

Max
allow able
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

400

D/t
80
60
40

350

347

API 5L-X70

297

API 5L-X60

257

API5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

Grade B

20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm 2)

300

250

200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 17 of 31

PR-1522

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Page 18 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.4: Gas Service


Vehicle 5 - 20 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure 50 - 100 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

600

D/t
80
60
40
20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

400

300

200

347

API 5L-X70

297

API 5L-X60

257

API 5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

Grade B

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 19 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.5: Gas Service


Vehicle 20 - 50 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure 50 - 100 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

600

D/t
80
60
40
20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

400

347

300

200

297

API 5L-X60

257

API 5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

Grade B

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

API 5L-X70

Page 20 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.6: Gas Service


Vehicle = Seismic
Pipeline Pressure 50 - 100 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

500

D/t
80
60

450

40
20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

400

350

347

300

297

API 5L-X60

257

API 5L-

208

API 5L-X42

173

Grade B

250

200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 21 of 31

API 5L-X70

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.7: Gas Service


Vehicle = 5 - 20 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure = 100 - 150 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

700

D/t
80
60
40

600

20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

400

300

200

347

API 5L-X70

297

API 5L-X60

257

API 5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 22 of 35

Grade B

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.8: Gas Service


Vehicle 20 - 50 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure 100 - 150 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

700

D/t
80
60
40

600

20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

400

300

200

347

API 5L-X70

297

API 5L-X60

257

API 5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 23 of 31

Grade B

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.9: Gas Service


Vehicle = Seismic
Pipeline Pressure 100 - 150 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.72 x SMYS)

700

D/t
80
60
40

600

20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

400

300

200

347

API 5L-X70

297

API 5L-X60

257

API 5L-X52

208

API 5L-X42

173

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 24 of 35

Grade B

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.10: Oil Service,


Vehicle 5 - 20 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure < 50 bar

Max
allow able
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

500

D/t
80
60

450

40

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

322

API5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

217

Grade B

20
400

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm 2)

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 25 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.11: Oil Service,


Vehicle 20 - 50 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure < 50 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

500

D/t
80
60

450

40

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

20
400

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

350

322

API 5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

300

250

217
200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 26 of 35

Grade B

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.12: Oil Service,


Vehicle = Seismic
Pipeline Pressure < 50 bar

Max
allow able
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

500

D/t
80
60

450

40

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

322

API5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

217

Grade B

20
400

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm 2)

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 27 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.13: Oil Service


Vehicle 5 - 20 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure 50 - 100 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

600

D/t
80
60
40
20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

400

322

API 5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

300

217
200

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 28 of 35

Grade B

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.14: Oil Service


Vehicle 20 - 50 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure 50 - 100 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

600

D/t
80
60
40
20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

400

322

API 5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

300

217
200

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 29 of 31

Grade B

PR-1522

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Page 30 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.15: Oil Service


Vehicle = Seismic
Pipeline Pressure 50 - 100 bar

Max
allow able
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

500

D/t
80
60

450

40

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

322

API5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

217

Grade B

20
400

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm 2)

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 31 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.16: Oil Service


Vehicle = 5 - 20 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure = 100 - 150 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

700

D/t
80
60
40

600

20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

400

322

API 5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

217

Grade B

300

200

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 32 of 35

PR-1522

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Page 33 of 31

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.17: Oil Service


Vehicle 20 - 50 tonnes
Pipeline Pressure 100 - 150 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

700

D/t
80
60
40

600

20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

400

322

API 5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

217

Grade B

300

200

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 34 of 35

PR-1522

Procedure for Analysis of Pipeline Road Crossings

Attachment 2.18: Oil Service


Vehicle = Seismic
Pipeline Pressure 100 - 150 bar

Max
allowable
stress
(0.9 x SMYS)

700

D/t
80
60
40

600

20

Actual Calculated Max Hoop Stress (N/mm2)

500

434

API 5L-X70

372

API 5L-X60

322

API5L-X52

260

API 5L-X42

217

Grade B

400

300

200

100

0
300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Depth of Cover (mm)


(top of pipeline to grade)

Rev 0 (Oct 2002)

Page 35 of 31

You might also like