You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

131 / Tuesday, July 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules 37471

emergency preparedness as described 11555 Rockville Pike (First Floor), identified issues or problems, it is not
previously in the section titled, ‘‘The Rockville, Maryland. required to provide a proposed change
Proposed Amendments.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to accompany each identified issue or
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day Michele M. Sampson, Office of Nuclear problem. This information will assist
of July, 2007. Material Safety and Safeguards, USNRC, the DOT and the NRC in having a full
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone: range of views as the agencies develop
Annette Vietti-Cook, (301) 492–3292; e-mail: mxs14@nrc.gov. the proposed issues the U.S. will submit
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
to the IAEA.
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–13316 Filed 7–9–07; 8:45 am] II. Public Participation
I. Background
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Proposed issues or identified
The IAEA periodically revises its
problems should cite the publication
Regulations for the Safe Transport of
date and page number of this Federal
NUCLEAR REGULATORY Radioactive Material (TS–R–1) to reflect
Register document. Proposals must be
COMMISSION new information and accumulated submitted in writing (electronic file on
experience. The DOT is the U.S. disk in WordPerfect format preferred)
10 CFR Part 71 competent authority before the IAEA for and should include:
radioactive material transportation • Name;
Regulations for the Safe Transport of matters. The NRC provides technical
Radioactive Material; Solicitation of • Address;
support to the DOT in this regard, • Telephone No.;
Issue Proposals particularly with regard to Type B and • E-mail address;
AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory fissile transportation packages. • Principal objective of issue or
Commission. The IAEA recently initiated the identified problem (e.g., Required to
ACTION: Solicitation of Proposed Issues review cycle for a potential 2011 edition provide adequate protection to health
or Identified Problems with the of TS–R–1. The IAEA’s review process and safety of public and occupational
International Atomic Energy Agency calls for Member States and workers, needed to define or redefine
Regulations. International Organizations to provide level of protection to health and safety
proposals for review of issues or of public and occupational workers,
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory identified problems with the regulations required for consistency within the
Commission (NRC) and the U.S. to the IAEA by August 31, 2007. To Transport Regulations, required as a
Department of Transportation (DOT) are assure opportunity for public result of advances in technology,
jointly seeking proposed issues or involvement in the international needed to improve implementation of
identified problems with the regulatory development process, the the Transport Regulations);
International Atomic Energy Agency DOT and the NRC are soliciting • Topic of issue or identified
(IAEA) Regulations for the Safe proposals for issues or identified problem—Describe or frame the issue or
Transport of Radioactive Material problems with the IAEA international the identified problem by reference to or
(referred to as TS–R–1). Proposed issues transportation standard, TS–R–1, at this using the table of contents of TS–R–1
or identified problems that are time. (2005 Edition) and the Advisory
submitted by the United States and A specific area of interest are Material for the IAEA Regulations for
other IAEA member states and proposals related to the IAEA package the Safe Transport of Radioactive
International Organizations might surface contamination limits in TS–R–1. Material (TS–G–1.1 (ST–2));
necessitate subsequent domestic In 2000, an IAEA Coordinated Research • Justification for proposed change—
compatibility rulemakings by both NRC Project (CRP) to review contamination Provide a clear statement of the main
and DOT. control methods and develop a non- objectives of the proposed change and
DATES: Proposed issues or identified fixed contamination dose model for the solution ‘‘path’’ (e.g., change to
problems will be accepted until August packages was initiated. The results of regulations, additional guidance, a
15, 2007. Proposals received after this the CRP were published as IAEA– research project);
date will be considered if it is practical TECDOC–1449, Radiological aspects of • An assessment of the benefits and
non-fixed contamination of packages impacts of the proposed change—
to do so, however we are only able to
and conveyances, June 2005 (available Including changes in public and
assure consideration for proposals
at www.iaea.org). The CRP concluded occupational exposure, changes in
received on or before this date.
accident risk, and effects on health,
ADDRESSES: Comments may be that the current limits for non-fixed
safety or the natural environment. The
submitted either electronically or via contamination on packages were
affected parties should be identified.
U.S. mail. developed using very conservative
• Paragraphs affected and proposed
Mail proposed issues or identified assumptions. Potential alternative
text change to regulatory text in TS–R–
problems to Michael T. Lesar, Chief, methods of specifying contamination
1;
Rulemaking, Directives and Editing limits could include a radionuclide • Paragraphs affected and proposed
Branch, Mail Stop T6–D59, U.S. Nuclear specific approach. We are seeking input text change to IAEA advisory material in
Regulatory Commission, Washington, regarding the usefulness, feasibility or TS–G–1.1;
DC 20555–0001. Deliver proposals to practicality of implementing dose-based • A listing of any applicable reference
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, package surface contamination limits, documents;
Maryland, 20852, between 7:45 a.m. and and the issues or identified problems • Description of issue or identified
4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays. Submit pertinent to incorporation of new non- problem to be addressed;
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS

proposals by electronic mail to: fixed contamination limits into TS–R–1. • Summary of proposed solution to
nrcrep@nrc.gov. The focus of this solicitation is to the issue or identified problem; and
Copies of proposal documents identify issues or problems with the • Expected cost of implementation
received may be reviewed at the NRC’s current 2005 edition of TS–R–1. While (negligible, low, medium or high).
Public Document Room, One White it is helpful to identify potential The DOT and the NRC will review the
Flint North, Public File Area 01–F21, changes or solutions to resolve the proposed issues, identified problems,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:19 Jul 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM 10JYP1
37472 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules

rationales and, if included, changes and potential unsafe conditions as the aircraft responsibilities to identify and correct
proposed solutions. Based in part on the aged. unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
information received, the U.S. will * * * * * products.
develop proposed issues or identified The unsafe condition is degradation of This proposed AD references the
problems to be submitted to the IAEA the fuel system, which could result in MCAI and related service information
by August 31, 2007. loss of the airplane. The proposed AD that we considered in forming the
Proposed issues and identified would require actions that are intended engineering basis to correct the unsafe
problems from all Member States and to address the unsafe condition condition. The proposed AD contains
International Organizations will be described in the MCAI. text copied from the MCAI and for this
considered at an IAEA Transport Safety DATES: We must receive comments on reason might not follow our plain
Standards Committee (TRANSSC) this proposed AD by August 9, 2007. language principles.
Meeting to be convened by IAEA on ADDRESSES: You may send comments by Comments Invited
October 1–5, 2007, in Vienna, Austria. any of the following methods:
Prior to that meeting, the DOT and the We invite you to send any written
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
NRC will consider holding a public relevant data, views, or arguments about
http://dms.dot.gov and follow the
meeting to discuss the U.S. proposed this proposed AD. Send your comments
instructions for sending your comments
changes submitted to the IAEA. to an address listed under the
electronically.
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
2007–28663; Directorate Identifier
of June 2007. • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
2006–NM–223–AD’’ at the beginning of
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
your comments. We specifically invite
Kevin Williams, Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
comments on the overall regulatory,
Chief, Rules, Inspections, and Operations Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
economic, environmental, and energy
Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and 0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on aspects of this proposed AD. We will
Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material
the plaza level of the Nassif Building, consider all comments received by the
Safety and Safeguards.
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, closing date and may amend this
[FR Doc. E7–13318 Filed 7–9–07; 8:45 am]
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday proposed AD because of those
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
through Friday, except Federal holidays. comments.
We will post all comments we
• eFederal Rulemaking Portal: http://
receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION dms.dot.gov, including any personal
instructions for submitting comments.
information you provide. We will also
Federal Aviation Administration Examining the AD Docket post a report summarizing each
You may examine the AD docket on substantive verbal contact we receive
14 CFR Part 39 about this proposed AD.
the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or in
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28663; Directorate person at the Docket Management Discussion
Identifier 2006–NM–223–AD] Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
The European Aviation Safety Agency
Monday through Friday, except Federal
RIN 2120–AA64 (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
holidays. The AD docket contains this
for the Member States of the European
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation,
Community, has issued EASA
A300–600 Series Airplanes; and Model any comments received, and other
Airworthiness Directive 2006–0285R1,
A310 Series Airplanes information. The street address for the
dated November 13, 2006 (referred to
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
AGENCY: Federal Aviation 5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
unsafe condition for the specified
Administration (FAA), Department of Comments will be available in the AD
products. The MCAI states:
Transportation (DOT). docket shortly after receipt.
* * * the FAA issued in July 1996 an Aging
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Non-structural Systems plan to address the
(NPRM). Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, White House Commission on Aviation Safety
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, and Security (WHCSS) report.
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 To help fulfill the actions specified in this
airworthiness directive (AD) for the Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington Aging Systems plan, the FAA set-up in
products listed above. This proposed 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1622; January 1999 an Ageing Transport Systems
AD results from mandatory continuing fax (425) 227–1149. Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ATSRAC)
airworthiness information (MCAI) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
to investigate the potential safety issues in
issued by an aviation authority of aging aircraft as a result of wear and
another country to identify and correct Streamlined Issuance of AD degradation in their operating systems.
an unsafe condition on an aviation Under this plan, all Holders of type
The FAA is implementing a new Certificates aircraft are required to conduct a
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe process for streamlining the issuance of design review, to preclude the occurrence of
condition as: ADs related to MCAI. This streamlined potential unsafe conditions as the aircraft
* * * * * process will allow us to adopt MCAI aged.
* * * the FAA set-up in January 1999 an safety requirements in a more efficient Further to AIRBUS investigations on this
Ageing Transport Systems Rulemaking manner and will reduce safety risks to subject, corrected measures intended to
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS

Advisory Committee (ATSRAC) to investigate the public. This process continues to improve the design of A310 and A300–600
the potential safety issues in aging aircraft as fleet against potential unsafe conditions as
a result of wear and degradation in their
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative the aircraft aged, are rendered mandatory by
operating systems. this AD.
Under this plan, all Holders of type Procedure Act, and Federal Register
Certificates aircraft are required to conduct a requirements. We also continue to meet The unsafe condition is degradation of
design review, to preclude the occurrence of our technical decision-making the fuel system, which could result in

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:19 Jul 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM 10JYP1

You might also like