Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1/3 S U B H A R M O N I C
S O L U T I O N OF ELLIPTICAL
SANDWICH PLATES *
LI Yin-shan (~j~I~LLI)1,2,
ZHANG Nian-mei ( ~ z ~ )
2,
YANG Gui-tong ( ~ r ~ j ~ ) 2
the nonlinear dynamic equation of an elliptical sandwich plate under a harmonic force is
derived. A superpositive-iterative harmonic balance ( SIHB ) method is presented for the
steady-state analysis of strongly nonlinear oscillators. In a periodic oscillation, the periodic
solutions can be expressed in the form of basic harmonics and bifurcate harmonics. Thus,
an oscillation system which is described as a second order ordinary differential equation,
can be expressed as fundamental differential equation with fundamental harmonics and
incremental differential equation with derived harmonics. The 1/3 subharmonic solution of
an elliptical sandwich plate is investigated by using the methods of SIHB. The SIHB method
is compared with the numerical integration method. Finally, asymptotical stability of the
1/3 subharmonic oscillations is inspected.
Key words:
D o c u m e n t code: A
~roducfion
In recent years, with the essential advantage of light weight and high rigidity, sandwich
e,ates and shells have been used as an important pattern of structural elements in aeronautical,
~stronautical and naval engineering. However, nonlinear problems for sandwich plates and shells
am only investigated by a few because of the difficulties of nonlinear mathematical problems. Lin
1147
1148
Ren-huai and Xu Jia-chu h'2] and others have made some investigations in this field. Bifurcation
of nonlinear vibration for sandwich plates has not yet been investigated. In this paper, 1/3
subharmonic solution of elliptical sandwich plates is solved by superpositive-iterative harmonic
balance (SIHB) method.
At present a new and developing subject --chaos starts a broad prospect for analysis of
nonlinear system [3-7] . The strongly nonlinear problems are difficult to solve by the classical
procedures such as perturbation methods. Their main limitation may be generally due to the
unreasonable assumption of the constant frequency. Recently over the past ten years, in spite of a
series of findings of studies on strongly nonlinear oscillation [8~9] , quantitative studies on
superharrnonic and subharmonic solution remain to be solved, which now has to be solved by
numerical methods El~ .
A SIHB method is presented for the steady-state analysis of strongly nonlinear oscillators.
The question of steady-state solution to a strongly nonlinear dynamic system is changed into less
nonlinear algebra equation groups. Program Maple can be used conveniently to solve the nonlinear
algebra equation groups so as to obtain an approximately analytic representation of steady-state
solution. Subharmonic or superharmonic solutions are obtained by superposition and iteration step
by step.
1
Basic Equations
Consider an elliptical sandwich plate under the action of an even transverse excitation
Qocoss 0 t , as shown in Fig. 1. Here a is long radius, b is short radius, h I is the thickness of the
face, h 0 is the distance between middle surface of the upper and lower face. The coordinate plane
xy coincides with the middle plane of the core. The two face sheets are assumed to have identical
g(-,y,I)
S
I_
F
Cl
,i
Fig. 1
-1
The theory of isotropic sandwich plates with very thin face sheets and soft cores was first
presented by Reissner. The basic assumptions are as follows:
1 ) The material is elastic and follows Hooke's law;
2) The core in the lateral direction is incompressible;
3) The core is not subjected to loads in the middle surface direction;
4) The faces are treated as membranes;
5) The line normal to the middle surface of the core remains straight during bending.
Under the above assumption, using Hamilton's principle, the nonlinear dynamic equations
of an elliptical sandwich plate under a harmonic force is derived [4] . The governing equations is
02~-"
2 o2v
8y 2 + (1
and ~by[l'2] -9
(02~
aw
)
--af_+~;v2w +
+(l-v)
(1
1149
v){ 32v
+ (8w/2 ]
3yy! j } = 0,
(la)
I O2v 3w
)
v)(~SxZ~+ T y V 2 W +
( 1 + v){ 82u
1 3
Owl'-+(3wlZ ]
a~
+ 2- ~y[(~x-x!
a-TY] ' } =
D -+
yZ + + ~
+ V-w
3x 3
3x~
3xZay
ay 3
i 7 -;'Ehl
+ ~~
0,%--~-
~j
+ 8
at"
Of
- Q0eos~t -
+ ~ :~x - 0 7 + ( 1 - ~ ) ~
+~
a-7~ , +
]072 +
Jay: + 2(1
+ ~J
(lb)
] 2"02 w
-=
[ ~
= p~
0,
(lc)
1 + v "r
Ow
D a2G
1- ~a2G +
_
- G + Y 7 = 0,
(ld)
G2h o ~
+ 2
3y 2
2
D 1+ v
G
1 - v 32r
02r I ~
aw
G,. ho
q- 3xOy + 2
3 x ,~ + 3yz:]~
G + ax
0'
(le)
where u, v and w are x displacement and y displacement and deflection of the middle surface of
the plate, respectively; r
Cy represent the rotations of a line segment, which is perpendicular
to the middle plane Oxy before deformation, in the xz plane and yz plane, respectively. E and v
are Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of the face, respectively, Gz is the shear modulus of
the core, D = Eho hi/(2( 1 - vz ) ) is the flexural rigidities of the Sandwich plate, p --- po + 2pf,
po and pf are the mass densities per unit area of the face and the core, respectively.
Let us introduce the following nondimensional parameters:
a
- b"
~-
a
c~9 = /77or ,
a4
qo = D~o Qo,
Y--~
~'
~y
v = b'
a
= - ~oCy,
k -
au
h~'
D
G2
ho a 2
by
h~'
r =
re_~o,
& t
,
(2)
~a 2
/2 =
o,
2n -
ho CpD"
2 3ZU
a~--r_ +
v)[2 zO2U
(1
3WIOZW
57v,_ +gg~
22 8z-W-- I
a~eav]]+
92V
1 0
oWl'o W e]
(1+ v){2zo--~-~+ ~-~-~[(se / + 22(-~)
} = O,
222-
av:
+ (1 - v)
OW
5g + ~v 5-g +
22
av~ ~ +
(3a)
1150
3 ~-W
a2U
@y
33 (~Sy _ ~3 3 7]
33 (~Sx _ A2 33 (~Sx
aV l a 2 W l _ 2 [
(I
-~-J
awl'- 1
awl 2
1 ~
aW
.I ar]2 -
4(1 - ; ) ; t 2 a W a W
a2W
3~ 87] 3~3r1 - q0cos~v = 0,
(3~,[
.~.28'-#~
;~ ~
(3c)
1+ ,. 3'r
3~ 2 +
Oy _
~ r + '~
= 0.
(3e)
The boundary conditions for an elliptical sandwich plate is rigidly clzmped edge. Eq. (3)
will be solved by the following nondimensional boundary conditions usually encountered in
engineering :
U = V = W = ~ = ~y = 0, at ~- + 7/2 = 1.
(4)
To obtain an exact solution of Eq. ( 3 ) with constraint equations ( 4 ) is not a task. A
modified Galerkin's technique appears most suitable for an approximate solution. It is assumed
that
i=O j=0
V = ~_~___jbii(r)(1- $ 2 _ ?]2)~2i712j+1 ,
(5b)
i=O j=O
W = 9(v)[1
2 +
+ 16k. ,
1 + 1 6k-( C-
r/2 )2],
(5c)
T]2)~:21+1 v2j,
(5d)
~_a~__adij(v)( 1 _ ~2 _ y]2)~2iT]2j+l ,
(5e)
C~) = G ~ d r
i=0
~2
rf- )
j=O
oo
ff)y
/=0 j=0
where 9 ( r )
(7)
f 1%/1-~ ~ [ 8 3 ~
,~2 8 3 ~ x
83~Y
,t3 83~y]
2 + 16k
1
~ - 3 1 [1 - 1 + 16k (t2 + ?]2) + 1 6+~
0/2=-
("l'v/~-~2 l" [
8U
+ ~2(8r
4(1 - v)), 2
1 + 16k
3?]
$z
?]z)2Jdr/d~ '
v))'z_.,
l f~--r/2
-lJ-~
(8a)
~-10---~J+
2 r + 2;-[
- -
2 + 16k(~z
[1 _ 2_ +_ l_6k
1 + 16k
2 + 16k
[1
_1 _+( ~16k
z
~2
?]2 )~2i+ 1 9j
+ ?]2)-I-
1+1~"
3-g~Jt 1
OWSW 8ZW~[
3~
8~ r 8 2
) z ( 2 ~ _~+3~' v_ff~_)8?]28~-/82~-+ (1
3~12
1151
(8b)
+ ?]2) + ~ ( 1
+ ?]z)2
+ 7/2) + 16------k
1+
(
~2
dr/de,
+ r/2)Z]d?]d~,
(8c)
(8d)
where
U = ~ 2 ( 1
i=0 j=0
= 1
~
=
iffi0 j=0
2 + 16k ( ~z
?]z
~
1 + 16k
+
) + 1
= 22(1
i~0 j=0
(~2 +
- ~ z _ ?]2)~2~+1@i,
?]2
)2,
~, = 2 2 ( 1 _
i=0
~ 2 _ ?]2)~zi~zj+,.
jffiO
A Superpositive-Iterative Harmonic
Balance Method
Instead of special example ( 6 ) , we treat general systems. Thus we consider the forced
oscillations of strongly nonlinearity systems having a single degree of freedom:
+ 2n~ + f(x)
= qcosg2t.
(10)
The procedure of the SIHB method for seeking periodic solution is divided into two main
steps.
The first step is Newton-Raphson procedure.
Make a hypothesis:
1152
x ( t ) + Xo(t) + y ( t ) ,
(11)
in which X o ( t ) is a basic
equation :
~0 + 2n~0 + f ( x 0 )
= qcost2t.
(12)
+ 2rty +
21f(k)(x)
k= 1
n"
yk
(13)
= O.
.'g = x o
(14)
According to form ( 1 3 ) , the derived solution y ( t ) can be solved Ritz' s mean method step
by step.
3
3.1
Analytical .Solution
Basic harmonics solution
A hypothesis of basic harmonic solution of Eq. (6) formed as follows
q~( t ) = al ( t ) c o s / T t
+ bl ( t ) s i n O t .
(15)
bl - 2s
(16a)
(16b)
= glcosOt + blsinOt.
(17)
Whose coefficients are singularities of differential equation group ( 1 6 ) , which can be obtained by
solving the following group of nonlinear algebraic equations:
3
_z
(18a)
(18b)
The stability of steady-state basic harmonic solution (17) can be judged by the characteristic roots
of the following linearized coefficient matrix of differential equation group (16) :
3albl
4/7
A 1 =
3.2
1 - /72
2/7
3 ( 3 a l2 + b))
8/7
1 - g'22 3 ( a ~ + 3b~)
+
20
80
3
-
It
~-~a
b1
1/3 s u b h a r m o n i c s o l u t i o n
A hypothesis of 1/3 subharmonic solution of Eq. (6) formed as follows :
(19)
= ~l(t)
1153
+ ~xn(t),
(20)
qol(t) = a l ( t ) c o s ~ t
+ bl(t)sin~t;
(21a)
~m(t)
(21b)
p2
3/zpl @2/3
(22)
"bl + 2nbl - 2 0 a l
+ (P'- - OZ)ba - 2 n O a i
+ 3bT13) = 0,
(23a)
f2 2 ai/3 + ~ n , Q b l / 3
- b~/3
= O,
(23b)
{ 3
~
2
tz.~al/,3(ay/3 + ba/3 + 2a 2 + 2b~) +
3
,
~al(aT/3
- b])3) + ~ b l a l / 3 b l / 3 .
p2 _
~z
= 0,
(23c)
bm _ ~_ns
m +
o - b~/3) }
~bl(a~/3
= 0.
(23d)
= ~l(t)
+ ~1/3(t),
(24)
= aieos~t
+ blsinl2t,
(25a)
~t
~t
= (~i/3eos ~ - + bi/3sin ~ - .
(25b)
Whose coefficients are singularities of differential equation group (23), which can be obtained by
solving the following group of nonlinear algebraic equations:
-~
(p'- - 0 2 ) ~ 1 + 2nY2D 1 - q + ,u -3- ~_a i ( a_ ,~ + D2 + 291z/3 + 2bl/3
) +
1
_,
-2 }
~a113(a~/3 - 3 b y 3 ) . = 0,
3
(p2 _ O~_)~a _2mQgz + ,u ~-ba(a~-" + ~2 + 2~2/3 + 2/~z3 ) +
(26a)
1154
--'~
-2
~ b 2 1 3 ( 3 a ' ~ l 3 - bl/3)
(p~ _
~-22-
,)
3_
I3
51/3 - I - - ~ r k O b 2 1 3
_,
~ a 2 ( a~/3 --
b12/3) q-
(26b)
= 0,
+ /z[-~-
1/3
3-
(_,
(26c)
~b15113~)113 = O,
3-
p2 _
2 n22al13
_
~ 222 ) b213 _ _.~
+ /z {-~- b 1/3 ( a-'~i/3 + /~/3 + 2g~ + 2b}) 3
3}
~ a l S l 1 3 b l l 3 + -~-b1(52/3 - b}/3) = 0.
(26d)
The stability of steady-state 1/3 subharmonic solution (24) can be judged by the characteristic
roots of the following linearized coefficient matrix of differential equation group (23).
The nonlinear algebraic equations (26) can be deduced and calculated by Maple programme
and iterative method. Iterative steps are
First step
obtained;
Second step
Third step
Let ga
d~~
b2
b~~
b~0) , t,~-(~
solving(26c), (26d)
-- 0 ,
= 0 are
ui'(~
to obtain ~213
~(1)
(1) ;
, ~01/3
...
Fourth step
Fifth step
Let51
g~ k) ,
h I ----
--(k+l) ,
Let if1/3 = au3
b~k ) , solving(26c)
D 1 1 3 = -1/3
~(k+l) .
( 2 6 d ) , t o o b t a i n o,x(k+l)
1/3
~ i(k+l)
t) 1/3
;
if [ ff~k+l) _ if{k) [ < e = 10-6 , then going on to the next step, else, going to the Fourth step;
Sixth step
b2 = b~ k + l ) , ~ / 3
4
Numerical
= ~~ (mk + 2 ) , a l l 3
Calculation
Results
(focus) ,
f52 = - 6 . 5 6 3 3 9 2 7 9 1
B: l b2
0.685 889 977 4
(saddle point)
(focus).
The coefficients of steady-state 1/3 harmonic solutions (24) are given by means of Eq. (26), in
which coefficients A o , A I , A
2 of fundamental solution ( 2 5 a )
=
51
bl
-0.017
1.056582
434713
37207
(focus) '
A1 -"
{ ~l = - 1 " 2 0 3 9 4 2 2 1 0 0
bl = 0.029 939 240 54
(focus),
and
A~_:
{~1 = - 1 . 1 0 9 5 6 4 257
bl
0 . 0 2 1 158 117 17
(~)
0"1/3_
= 2 . 0 1 2 720 533 00
b 1/3
0 . 0 6 0 974 947 77
( saddle p o i n t ) .
rdl/3 = -
(focus)
'
~) ~ bl/3
fly3
(focus)
1 . 0 5 9 166 12
(focus),
= - 0 . 9 5 3 554 412 7
t b 1/3
[bl~
1155
(focus),
(saddle point),
(saddle p o i n t ) ,
(saddle point).
Substituting those coefficients into ( 2 4 ) , seven 1/3 subharmonic solutions (27) are obtained, in
which 1/3 subharmonic solution ( 2 7 b ) is given in F i g . 3 .
8
0.04
0.02
:..3"
-\
bl
.............
-4
- 0.02
-8
-0.04
-1
.......
-4
-i--O
3
-3
-1
14I
t
t
-1 II !~9149
i~
-5
II -9165
.....
.~....
-3
84 ,.i
....
2
i ....
10
t
....
15
20
-1:
-3
.i.i.~.i
-1
iiiiiii
iii i
0f
i.
10
09
= 1 . 0 5 6 6 e o s ( 6 . 3 t - 3 . 1 2 5 0)
(27a)
(stability),
= 1 . 2 0 4 3 e o s ( 6 . 3 t - 3 . 1 1 6 7) + 2 . 0 1 3 6 c o s ( 2 . 1 t - 0 . 0 3 0 286)
(stability),
(27b)
= 1 . 2 0 4 3 e o s ( 6 . 3 t - 3 . 1 1 6 7) + 2 . 0 1 3 6 e o s ( 2 . 1 t - 2 . 1 2 4 7)
(stability),
(27c)
1156
3.116 7) + 2 . 0 1 3 6 e o s ( 2 . 1 t -
4.219 1)
(stability),
(27d)
(unstability),
(27e)
(unstability),
(27f)
= 1.109 8 e o s ( 6 . 3 t -
(unstability) .
(27g)
= T/35,
3f
15
14
-3
520
540
i
i
.
H
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilliii iii
2
0 iJ
2
0
- 15
530
i.
....
6 7-! ....
-5
-1
10 ....
-3
-1
10
.0 ,d o.o
9,
Fig. 5
9 ...
"~.': ....
|[
ir
25
q
30
Conclusions
1) The 1/3 subharmonic oscillations for elliptical sandwich plates can be described by
solving the hypothesis ( 2 4 ) .
In t h e subharmonic frequency scope, the steady-state 1/3
subharmonic solution obtained by SII-IB method considerably tallies with that by numerical
integration.
2) By means of SIHB, the numbers of 1/3 subharmonic solution, the stability of the
solutions the analytic representations of the Solutions and bifurcate situation of the solutions can be
obtained.
Fig . 2 ( c )
1157
harmonic fundamental response yet, there is the same fundamental solution in the other three
solutions. The 1/3 harmonics are symmetric, their phase difference is 27r/3. Focus 1 is a zero
solution. Three foci ( 2 , 3 , 4 )
constitute
References:
[ 1]
[ 2 ]
[ 3 ]
[4 ]
[ 5 ]
[ 6 ]
[ 7 ]
[ 8 ]
[ 9 ]
E10 ]
LIU Ren-huai, LI Jun. Nonlinear vibration of shallow conical sandwich shells[ J]. Int J Non-Linear
Mech, 1995,30(2) :97 - 109.
XU Jia-chu, WANG Cheng, LIU Ren-huai. Nonlinear vibration of elliptical sandwich plates EJ ] .