Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Maney Publishing is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Field Archaeology.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Lacustrine
Formative
Adaptation:
BotanicalRemainsfrom
Terremote-Tlaltenco,
M6xico
D.F.,
EmilyMcClungde Tapia
MariCarmenSerraPuche
EllenLim6nde Dyer
Amrnie
Instituto
de Investigaciones
Antropol6gicas
de Mexico
Universidad
NacionalAut6noma
Mexico,D.F., Mexico
DistritoFederal, Mexico,
The extensiveexcavationof Terremote-Tlaltenco,
data concerning
in thesouthernBasin ofMexico, has providedsignificant
humanadaptationto lacustrineconditionsduringtheMiddle and Late Formativeperiods in thisregionofMesoamerica.Resultsof theanalysisof
abundantlypreservedarchaeobotanicalremainsfromthesite are described
here in an attemptto illustratetheirrole in understanding
prehispanicsubsistenceactivitiesin theBasin.
Introduction
is situatedon an
The Late Formative
periodsiteof Terremote-Tlaltenco
shoreofLakeChalco,the
artificial
island(FIGS.1,2) attheedgeoftheancient
southernmost
of a seriesof shallowinlandlakesthatcharacterized
theBasin
of Mexicoin prehispanic
times.The prehistoric
of
the
area was
occupation
Armillas
Pedro
who
carried
out
test
excavations
atthe
initially
investigated
by
sitein 1970,andlaterbyPaulTolstoywhoexcavatednearby
at El Terremote
in 1972.1In 1976theextensive
excavation
ofTerremote-Tlaltenco
was undertakenby Mari CarmenSerraPuche2undertheauspicesof theInstitute
for
National
Autonomous
of
Mexico.
Six
Research,
Anthropological
University
moundsandthreetrenches
wereexcavated
twofieldseasons,from1976
during
to 1978, and in situmacrobotanical
as well as flotation
specimens
samples
wererecovered
fromselectedcontexts
theexcavatedareas.
throughout
The following
describes
theplantremains
fromMounds8, 9, and 1,
report
andprovides
a preliminary
all
of
botanical
remains
identified
todate.
summary
1. PedroArmillas,
"Gardenson Swamps,"Science174 (1971) 653-661;Paul Tolstoyet al.,
oftheBasinofMexico,"JFA4 (1977)91-106;C. EarleSmith,
Communities
"EarlySedentary
Jr.andPaulTolstoy,
andManintheBasinofMexico,"Economic
"Vegetation
Botany35 (1981)
415-433.Terremote-Tlaltenco
is thesitethatArmillas,
as
op. cit.(in thisnote)661, designated
to it as sitenumber
50. This
14QMS972324.Tolstoyet al., op. cit. (in thisnote)92, referred
samesiteis labeledXO-LF-2in Jeffrey
R. Parsonset al., "Prehispanic
Settlement
Patterns
in
theSouthern
14 (1982)
Valleyof Mexico:The Chalco-Xochimilco
Region,"MMichMusAnth
116. Sitenumber
inTolstoyet al., op. cit.(in thisnote)92, is referred
to by
51, as designated
Parsonset al., op. cit.(in thisnote)94, as XO-EF-2.Thissiteis locatedca. 350 m tothesouth
of#50,anditis thesiteoftheEarlyFormative
referred
tobyTolstoy
as El Terremote.
occupation
2. The surfacesurvey,
and
excavation
of
was
carried
outunder
mapping,
Terremote-Tlaltenco
thedirection
of Mari CarmenSerraPucheduring1976-1978.AmieEllen Lim6nde Dyer
theseparation
andpreliminary
identification
ofbotanical
fromfloated
soil
completed
specimens
andinterpretation
withrespect
tosampleproveniences
samples.Thereviewofbotanical
specimens
was carried
outbyEmilyMcClungde Tapia.
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
WWI v
ow
(a)
(b)
Torfemote -Tlaftonco
MMOUD
MOUND
10MUNDI
(c)ON
MOUND 15
10
0
20
C. Terremote-Tlaltenco.
B. TheBasinofMexico;
A. Mesoamerica;
ofTerremote-Tlaltenco.
1. Location
Figure
as
enlightenment
The botanicalmaterialsthusfaridentified
providesignificant
the
as well as information
regarding
to the subsistencebase of the settlement
of
kindsof exploitativeand productiveactivitiescarriedout by theinhabitants
theLate Formativecommunity.
of
Tolstoy's test excavationsat El Terremoteand elsewherein the Basin
because
here
our
for
purposes
Mexico, howeversmall in scale, are significant
an effortwas made to recoverstratigraphic
samplesof botanicalmaterial.The
analysisof these specimens,carriedout by Dr. C. Earle Smith,Jr.,provided
conditionsin the
directbotanical data relativeto Formativeenvironmental
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Journal
13, 1986 101
ofFieldArchaeology/Vol.
S_____
--
-.~-
site
Sierra
Lill
Archaeological
SAN FRANCISCO-
TLAPACOYA
Modern Chinampas
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Ox
x
x
~-~u
?x
x"=
x
xx
x
x
X
X
x
X
x
x
x'.
x
x
N
x
X-:?x
14UpperPiedmon
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
C
--V\1
x
x
X,
x
x
x
x
x
xXx
x
xx
x
xx
xx
-X
x:
x
x
X
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
X
X
x
x
X
X
X
- WUpand
---X--Allviu
xxxx
x----xxX
-x xx
W
xxX
X
xxxxxc"I/x x
Xxxxxx
STLALTENCO
-TERREMOTE
TLALTENC
~
~--
-Lake
LakeshoreAlluvium
System
LowerPiedmont
.UUppaer
Piedmont
-
-Upland
x** * *2
zonescharacteristic
ofthesouthern
BasinofMexico.North
is attop.
Figure2. Environmental
1979)93. PhasesforthesiteofZohapilcoarebasedonChristine
Niederberger,
Zohapilco:Cinco
ofvariousauthors,
1976) 10. FortheValleyofMexico,phasesarebasedon a synthesis
among
them:Niederberger,
ibid. 10-11; GeorgeC. Vaillant,"Excavations
at Zacatenco,"AnthPapAmMusNHist
32 (1930) 1-197;idem,"Excavations
atTicoman,"
32 (1931)
AnthPapAmMusNHist
Culture
intheBasinof
199-451;PaulTolstoyandLouiseParadis,"EarlyandMiddlePreclassic
Mexico",Science167 (1970) 344-351;Sanders,Parsons,and Santley,1979 op. cit. (in this
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Alluvium
PERIODS
(PARSONS etal 1982)
300AD(NIEDERBERGER
150
0
BASIN OF MEXICO
ZOHAPILCO
VALLEYof MEXICO
TERREMOTE- TEOTIHUACAN
+
CSANDERS,PARSONS
TLALTENCO
(PARSGN97)(ASN1t82)1
1976) (PARSONSetl1982)(SERRAPUCHEI9801982)
MICCAOTLI
EARLYCLASSIC F.I.M
200
F. I. T
TZACUALLI
LATE
FORMATIVE
-CUANALAN
200
PATLACHIQUE
F.111400
"N
F" -
TICOMAN
600
TEZOYUCA
300
500
600
ZACATENCO-6
700FIRST
MIDDLE
800
100 BC
.
FPATLACHIQUE200
FT fI1
TICOMAN
300
500
31
TTZACUALLI
i00 BC TERMINAL
FORMATIVE
400
g
',,SI979.MILm.OI
MICCAOTLI
7OO
INTER-
700
CUAUTEPEC-700
LA PASTORA
FORMATIVE MEDIATE
CHICONAUTLA800
MANANTIAL
900
EL
I000
ARBOLILLO
,900
ALTICA
BOMBA
1150
EARLY
1000
MANANTIAL
HORIZON1300
BC
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
JournalofField Archaeology/Vol.
13, 1986 103
olla rims)
sincethelatestceramics(principally
Valley of Mexico terminology),
correspondto thispointin time.9
Environmental
Settingsin theBasin ofMexico
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1976-1978
Excavationsat Terremote-Tlaltenco:
Archaeologicalevidence suggeststhattheearliesthumanoccupationof the
in thesouthernzone, close to theshoresof
Basin of Mexico was concentrated
Lakes Chalco and Xochimilco.Demographicgrowth,however,graduallyled
to the expansion of agriculturalpopulationsinto the surrounding
piedmont
and the degreeof nucleationintensified,
areas. As the numberof settlements
so did theprocessof increasinghierarchical
sociopoliticalorganization.By the
Late TerminalFormativeperiod (ca. 650 B.C.-150 A.C.; First Intermediate
phases 2, 3, and 4) thereis a clearlyestablishedpatternof hierarchicalsettlecontrolledrelatively
centersthatapparently
ments,dominatedby supraregional
100 ha withsubover
settlements
centers
(nucleated
covering
large regional
and theirsurrounding
stantialcivic architecture)
villages.17 The focusof settlementin the Basin of Mexico changesthen,fromthe lakeshoreplain to the
apparentlydevelopedinto a
piedmontzone. The site of Terremote-Tlaltenco
"regionalcenter,"possiblydependentupon Tlapacoya and Cuicuilco in some
in itsown righton thebasis of itsstrategic
measure,butpresumablysignificant
access to lacustrineresourcesas well as to the fertilealluvial soils on the
lakeshoreplain. An additional,as yetunexcavated,sitelocatedon themainland
to thenorthof Terremote-Tlaltenco
(San FranciscoTlaltenco,FIG.2) mayhave
for
the
community.
products
providedagricultural
Fluctuationsin lake level, principallyresultingfromintenseseasonal rains
a seriousproblemfortheoccupants
and consequentflooding,wereundoubtedly
of a series of artificialmoundsin the marshzone
of the site. The formation
13. Ibid. 87.
14. Ibid. 88.
15. Ibid.
16. Ibid.
17. Ibid. 55.
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
JournalofField Archaeology/Vol.
13, 1986 105
ratherthanfurther
inland,however,suggeststhatthe importanceof abundant
lacustrineresourcesfaroutweighedthe risksto a settlement
in such environmentalcircumstances.
The moundsof Terremote-Tlaltenco
are primarilyresidentialand contain
one or two houses, withtheexceptionof Mound 1, whichis characterized
by
a substantially
different
typeof architecture.
The house moundsare builton foundations
constructed
of alternating
layers
of mud and vegetation,held in place by a frameof wood and stone. Mud
floorsare outlinedin places by double rows of stones,whichprobablyserved
as bases forwalls of wattleand daub. The abundanceof fragmentary
remains
of petates (woven reed mats) embeddedin mud floorssuggeststheiruse as
floorcoverings(and possiblyon walls as well).
units,thediscoveryofdiscrete
Duringthecourseofexcavatingthehabitation
concentrations
of different
of
artifacts
(needles, baskets,metates,plant
types
thedesignationof specificactivityareas.18
remains,etc.) permitted
BotanicalRemainsfromTerremote-Tlaltenco
Because of theavailabilityofarchaeologicaldataofconsiderablesignificance
fortheinterpretation
of possible subsistenceactivitiesfromMounds 8, 9, and
1, the plant remainsfromthese threeunitswill be consideredindividually
(TABLES 2, 3, 4). In order to provide an idea of the range of plant genera,
however,and the kinds of vegetal materialsthathave been preservedat the
site of Terremote-Tlaltenco,
theresultsof thepreliminary
analysisof archaeobotanicalremainsare summarizedin Table 5.
Mound 8
The distribution
of specificartifactsand organic remainsin relationto
featuressuch as hearthsand house walls was analyzedby means of cluster
analysisin orderto develop a methodfordetermining
specificactivityareas.19
Identifiable
carbonizedplantremainsfromtheoccupationfloorsof thismound
are not abundant,however,althoughthe followinggenera and familiesare
(TABLE 2):
represented
Zea mays(kernels,cupules) - maize
Gramineae(caryopses)- Grass family
Chenopodiumsp. (seeds) - probablyC. nuttalliae,huauhtzontli
Amaranthussp. (seeds)
Mollugo sp. (seeds)
- Mexican cherry,capulin
Prunuscapuli (seed coat fragments)
Phaseolus vulgaris(cotyledons)- beans,frijol
Cactaceae (seeds) - Cactus family
wood charcoal
calcifiedfibers
The associationof maize, beans, amaranth,chenopodium,and cacti with
apparenthearthareas suggeststhat these plants may comprisepart of the
18. Mari Carmen Serra Puche, "La Unidad Habitacional en Terremote-Tialtenco,
D.F.: Un
Anilisis de Distribuci6nEspacial para DefinirAreas de Actividad(PrimeraParte),"Anales de
Antropologia17 (1980) 167-185.
19. Ibid.
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
in in in0 n0 0 0
_
7 + 5+
(kernels)
(cobs)
(cupules)
Zea mays
It..t
"
Gromineoe
Fiam.
Scirpus
sp
Chenopodium sp
"
01
o0
If
27
4
3
2
5
5
sp
Amaranthus
Mollugo
sp
Prunuscapull
Phassolus vulgaris
If
2
Phasesolus sp.
Fam. Coctaceae
Unidentifiedseeds
Unidentifiedwood
FIBERS
Unidentified
fibers
2f
2
2 + 1+
X
(carbonized)
(calcified)
TUBERS
Unidentifiedtuber
4
86
X
If
X
X
X= Presence
GENUS
Zee mays
(kernels)
(cobs)
I +
(cpulpes)
.11
Forn
Graomineoe (coryopes,)
M
*
Scirpussp
Cyper
20 f 44+
(stem)
"
I
1&
(stelm)
0
o
1f
-3
-3
-3
10
Portuloce
Prantscopu# ,sp
/s
aseousrvulfpr
Phoaseots
coccinus
Phaseo/usop.
p
Opunt/lao
Foan.Coctacea
cuFrblo
pepo
sp.
Cucur'to
If
233
+
-3
9f
372
-3
468
12
28
2
4+
8o0
If
Unidentified
seeds
(calcified)
(carbonized)
(calcfied)
23
30
200
13
+.Adltione!fragments
.
7
I
faFregments .
If
4f
I f
II
I
X
X
10 + _ 6
+
If
(carborized)
838
I f
288
-2
108
If
(peatncl)
Is
6t
1+
60 '228
I
-I7
I
If
"Oblongseed"
Unidentified
embryo
wood
Unidentifled
FIBERS
Unidentified
Ropes
PVropites oustroNa
-3
735
Chenopo.dum
Chno - Amrs op.3.
-3
..
up
AmornthusSp
Is
48 + 19 f
X Presence .
,**aKemels withsevpules
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
53
I f
JournalofField Archaeology/Vol.
13, 1986 107
subsistencebase, althoughtheirfrequenciesin thismoundare relativelylow.20
It shouldbe noted,in any case, thatwhile maize and beans representdomesticatedagricultural
products,cacti, amaranth,and chenopodiummay well be
wild, gatheredgenera.
The carbonizedseeds ofAmaranthus
recoveredfromthesitehave an average
diameterof 1.0 mm, whichfallswithinthe averagesformodernwild species
in Northand Middle America.21 Similarly,the archaeologicalspecimensof
Chenopodiumhave an average diameterof 1.5 mm, again, withinthe range
of modernwild species. With respectto seed size, it will be necessaryto
investigatethe range of variationin wild CentralMexican species of these
genera.It is also unclearat presentwhattheeffectsof a highwatertable and
fertilealluvial soils may be on thegrowthconditionsof wild "weedy" genera
such as Amaranthusand Chenopodium.Consequently,thevalidityof a factor
such as relativeseed size is notwithoutitsproblems.On theotherhand,these
particulargenerado not apparentlyundergosignificant
morphologicalchange
as a resultof cultivation,and seed size togetherwithhighfrequencymay be
the only potentialhallmarkof theirintentional
propagation.In summary,this
particularassociationof apparentlyuncultivated
plants,togetherwithmaize
and beans, does call attentionto the potentialimportanceof gatheredplant
of Mound 8.
resources,in spiteof thelow specimencountscharacteristic
Mound 9
Mound 9, situatedon the westernrimof the island (FIG. Ic), is difficult
to
in termsof the distribution
of houses and activityareas. Several
interpret
hearthswere foundaccompaniedby ollas fullof plantremains,butit was not
thelimitsof anyparticularstructures
since no associated
possibleto determine
walls could be located.
The followingplant materialshave been identifiedfromflotationsamples
and in situcontextsfromMound 9 (TABLE3):
- maize
Zea mays(kernels,cupules,cob fragments,
stemfragments)
Gramineae(caryopses)- Grass family
Scirpus sp. (seeds) - bullrush,tule
Cyperussp. (seeds) - sedge, tule
Chenopodiumsp. (seeds) - huauhtzontli
Amaranthussp. (seeds)
Portulaca sp. (seeds) - purslane,verdolaga
Prunuscapuli (seeds) - Mexican cherry,capulin
Phaseolus vulgaris(cotyledons)- bean,frijol
P. coccineus(cotyledons)- runnerbean, ayocote?
Cactaceae (seeds) - Cactus family
"oblong seed"
unidentified
carbonizedseeds
unidentified
calcifiedfibers
carbonizedrope fragments
Phragmitesaustralis- calcifiedand carbonizedfibers
FrequenciesforPhaseolus vulgarisare based on the numberof cotyledons
presentin a 10g sample. The abundanceof P. vulgaristendsto distortthe
20. The recoveryof soil samplesfromMound 8 was particularly
difficult
because of theextreme
hardnessof the livingsurfacesthatwere excavated.
21. AlexanderC. Martinand William D. Barkley,Seed Identification
Manual (Universityof
CaliforniaPress: Berkeley 1961) 151, 153; Marina Villegas y de Gante,Malezas de la Cuenca
de Mexico (M6xico, D.F., 1979) 30-38.
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
fromMound1 as a unit
The principal
plantgenera(FIGS.4-9) recovered
the
include following:
- maize
cob fragments,
Zea mays(kernels,
cupules,stemfragments)
- Grassfamily
Gramineae
(caryopses)
Chenopodiumsp. (seeds) - huauhtzontli
Amaranthussp. (seeds)
- avocado
Persea americana (seed fragments)
Mollugo sp. (seeds)
Portulaca sp. (seeds) - purslane,verdolaga
Prunuscapuli (seeds) - Mexican cherry,capulin
Phaseolus vulgaris(cotyledons)- bean,frijol
P. coccineus (cotyledons)- runnerbean, ayocote?
Cactaceae (seeds) - Cactus family
Solanaceae (seeds) - (not Capsicumsp.)
Cucurbitapepo (uncarbonizedseeds, peduncles)- squash
wood charcoal
carbonizedand calcifiedfibers(Gramineae,Amaryllidaceae,
Cyperaceae)
"oblong seed"
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Journal
13, 1986 109
ofFieldArchaeology/Vol.
Table4. Botanical
remains
recovered
from
Mound1,bygenusandexcavation
unit.
[
[
1-;
IGENUS
YI[....'
Pinus Sp
-.I
(bark)
Zeo mos
S(cobs)
i
" "
38
(kernels)
(stem
Fam.Gramineae (corypsi)
S
Chnowpo~wn
29 f
4 f
31
(stem)
(spine)
1+
!.!,,i',"o
I + 7931
3
13
3f
cupuis)
"
Agve sp
Scirpus p
'
23
3
X
70
23
5
6
Mollugo sp
31'
16
10
6+
5029
if
29.+
Oxoi@ sp
Famn.Coctaceas
Physlis
sv..2
sp
1+
2
21
4
If
S+
9f
If
(seeds)
I f
(pedutcle)
I+
I 16
seed
O"Fom
Unidentifiedseeds
61
Unidentifiedwood
(corbonized)
UniSpntifiedwood
(uncorbonized)
FIBERSIIrames
oustrols
Fao. Graminas
(carbonized)
0
(uncorbonized)
"
Unidentified
(calcified)
Unidentified
(corbonized)
Stems
(unidentified)
3+
X
X
X
If tIf
2
2
X
X
X
X
3 ..18"
X
7
X
2f
I +
+*Aditi
lI fromnts.
5+
X
3+
I+
221
39
1
X
4+
X
X
X
x
fIFregneats,
13
4+
2 f
X
X
-
X
X
ark)
of 10 grem.s
*Frequency based on weight
X
X
x
X
Xm
PPresence
basket
roe
38Aropes
isi'
83
16
8A3
2l
I16I
38
If
4+
2i
If
+
Fam. Leguminoeas
'
2+
Prunwe
cpuit
nPhseolus vulgor/s
Ph. occinus
Phoaolus gp.
sp.
Ficus sp
_Agave
20 441
I
f
w1
2+
Famn.
Carophyllacea
Perseo americeane
Cucurbite
2
5
Prtfotco
esp
Solanun
u
Fam. Solonoceas
Cucurbito pop
"
"
04
601 141
I f
3
5
so
Cheno-Ams
,moronr
"
1p
I
A3
ofMound1,showing
Figure3. Partial
profile
possibleembarcadero
area).
(docking
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
A3
I
A3
2f
ofCucurbita
4. Peduncles
pepo
Figure
(Mound1,SquareB4, LayerXII).
seedsofCucurbita
Figure5. Carbonized
pepo(Mound1, SquareB4, LayerXI).
formaize,
It willbe notedin Table4 thatseveralof thehighfrequencies
of
of
a
on
the
based
and
beans
are
(10 g) thetotal
amaranth,
weight proportion
that
unit.
We
excavation
from
a
emphasize theseexcessively
sample
particular
out of context,becauseof the
not
be
considered
should
highfrequencies
theirsurvivalandbecauseof
thatpermitted
conditions
excellentpreservation
or
basket
vessel
thenatureoftheirprovenience
contents).
(i.e.,
By no means
evidencefora proportional
as definite
shouldtheybe misconstrued
dependence
products.
upontheseagricultural
As was thecase withthespecimensfromMounds8 and 9, theaverage
inthesamplesfrom
Mound
andChenopodium
ofseedsofAmaranthus
diameter
true
therangeofmodemwildspecies.Thesameis apparently
1 is wellwithin
which
of
as wellforthecarbonized
Portulaca,
vary
archaeological
specimens
thesamerangeas modemwild
in diameter
between0.5-1.0 mm,exhibiting
of a
at present
seedsof thatgenus.We noteherethatthereis no indication
as
has
been
such
and
Amaranthus
between
Chenopodium
possiblerelationship
in the
tentatively
suggestedduringtheClassic periodat urbanTeotihuacan
or simulBasin of Mexico,eitherin termsof specimen
northern
frequencies
is clearlymoreabundant
Amaranthus
in sampleunits.22
taneousoccurrence
evenwhentheexceptionally
at Terremote-Tlaltenco,
thanChenopodium
high
mentioned
are
of
Amaranthus
de-emphasized.
previously
frequencies
ofBotanicalRemainsfromTerremote-Tlaltenco
The Interpretation
Detailedanalysisof the maize (Zea mays)and beans (Phaseolusspp.)
We
has notyetbeenundertaken.
recovered
duringSerraPuche'sexcavations
those
in
with
are
accordance
observations
that
our
cansayatpresent,
however,
examined
ofthemaizekernels
as themajority
of SmithandTolstoy,23
insofar
to date appearsto be nearlyisodiametric
(of equal dimensions),
suggesting
theirpossibleinclusionin theNal-Tel/Chapalote
complex.We haveassigned
themajorityof thebean specimens(FIG.10)to Phaseolus vulgaris,in addition
Agavepoints
Figure6. Carbonized
(Mound1, SquareA4-B4,LayerIX).
ofZea
kernels
Figure7. Carbonized
mays(Mound1, SquareB4, LayerX).
as P.
identified
whichhavebeententatively
of specimens
number
to a limited
coccineus (runner
bean).24
to datefromthesiteof
On thebasis of thebotanicalmaterialidentified
traditional
that
the
we
Terremote-Tlaltenco
5), argue
(TABLE
maize/beans/squash
theFormative
inexistence
wasundoubtedly
period,
during
complement
dietary
Itis alsoquite
forBasinpopulations.
sourceofnutrients
a significant
providing
subsistence
was not the onlyimportant
evident,however,thatagriculture
this
communities
lake-associated
some
of
the
for
at
least
during period.
activity
ofTerremotethatthepopulation
evidencesuggests
Thepresent
archaeological
materials:
sourcesof subsistence
Tlaltencoheavilyexploitedthreepotential
resources.
and
terrestrial
lacustrine,
agricultural,
subsisofFormative
as theinterpretation
insofar
thatremain,
Theproblems
A
in
nature.
are fundamentally
is concerned,
tenceactivities
methodological
the
to
be
remains
seeds
of
unidentified
number
especially
reanalyzed,
large
intheTeotihuacan
22. EmilyS. McClungde Tapia,"PlantsandSubsistence
Valley.A.D. 100Ph.D. dissertation
(Brandeis1979).
750,"unpublished
23. SmithandTolstoy,
op. cit.(in note1) 428.
thepresenceofP. lunatus(sievabean),andit is possiblethat
24. SmithandTolstoymention
whenthe
as P. coccineus(runner
someof ourspecimens
bean)willbe reclassified
designated
reviewofdatais completed.
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
JournalofField Archaeology/Vol.
13, 1986 111
from
remains
recovered
Table5. Botanical
bygenusandmound(orpit).
Terremote-Tlaltenco,
8 MOUNDw9
MOM10 MOU10
15 PIT4
tMOUND
IMbON 5MOUND6fMOUND
GEM/S
Pinus ( bark) 1s
Zeo
m(nbryo)
mays
Typho sp.
*
?,
.
(kernels)
N *
*0959
(cobs)
lt f
(cPis)
(stem)
29f
Famr. Grominso
* *
(caryopsis)
(stem)
WA
AgpveSp (pine)
Cyperus
SP
Mollup
A.
28
22 f
8 .
13
16
Perseo americono
12
14
136
21
12
46
* 5137
6
S_
I+
15
2f
289
2
6
15
.56.
12
Oxolls ~*p
If
Opunfio spp
Fan. Coctoceoe
26
Capsicsn $.
Soloanm SpI
Fam.Soonceae
Cuoarbito pepo
*a
sp,
Cuabito
2
It
(seed)
(pedwnc.)
17+
If
If
wunideifidsee&d
otherundentified
remains
wood
(corbonized)
umidentified
FIBERS
Ficus (bork)
349
44,
I
94
377
26
6
I
arisrli.s
........
PIuvpniwAts
Fam.
Gromineoe
(coroba*ed)
(unc.rba.ipd)
(colciied)
unidetified
ropes
.......
x..
TUBERS
X
bond on weight of 10 grams;
X* Presemse
(uncorbontrzd)
stem (utIdentlfed)
*Frecuency
27
2f
Fomr
.Laguminooe
unidentified
If
7f
It1
.
Phesl coccia"1
179
24
Prunus cpildi
PhOseors vulgorls
46
If
6f
52
5f
2235
Portuloco ap.
Fan. Corophylloceae
Physolis
18
_30
41,820
Cheno- Ams
Of
Chenopodi,
Amronfthus
56
sp.
Sclrpus
PIT 5
fS
Frenmnts,
--Mdttiese
fragments.
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
X
X
Figure8. SeedsofPrunuscapuli(Mound
1,SquareB3, LayerVIII).
......
4ALA
CS
calcified
fibers,
Figure9. Unidentified
(Mound1,
rope,andreedfragments
SquareA3, LayerII).
unknown
theex"oblongseed"whichoccursin highfrequencies
throughout
cavationunitsstudied,25
thedetailedanalysisofmaizeandbeanspecimens
is
andwe haveyettodevelopcomplete
collections
forthe
pending,
comparative
ofwoodcharcoalandfibers.
identification
The majordifficulty,
lies
however,
in thesearchfora suitablemodelforthereconstruction
of Formative
subsistenceactivities,
andespeciallyforthemeansbywhichto evaluatethesignifof thesubsistence
icanceof thecomponents
base vis d vis one another.
One
of botanicaldatafromotherarchaeological
approachis through
comparison
sitesdatingto thesametimeperiod.Butarchaeobotanical
remains
havebeen
recovered
fromfewsitescorresponding
to theperiodin question.Ironically,
in thenorthern
datafroma Middle-Late
Formative
Basinof
periodsettlement
are available,butare virtually
uselessforour
Mexico,Loma Terremote,26
contextfromwhichthe specimenswere
purposessince the archaeological
recovered
at Terremote-Tlaltenco.
storagepits)is notrepresented
(bell-shaped
In addition,
interms
ofpresence-absence,
thuseffectively
thedataarereported
otherthana superficial
comparison.
eliminating
anything
We findthatthecomponents
oftheFormative
subsistence
base intheBasin
ofMexicoarecompletely
consistent
withwhatis reported
fortheClassic27and
Postclassic28
andethperiods,andwithwhatis knownbothethnohistorically
thatthereare indications
of a broadrange
The fact,however,
nographically.
ofvariability
ofsitesoccupying
in thesubsistence
different
system
ecological
contexts
duringthesamechronological
perioddoes suggestthata morefirm
basisis necessary
in orderto generalize
abouttheevolution
anddevelopment
ofprehistoric
subsistence
economies.
Conclusion
Based on the architectural
characteristics
of thehabitation
unitsand the
"ceremonial-civic"
Terremote-Tlaltenco
platform
(Mound1),
maybe classified
as a specializedvillagestrategically
situated
on thelakewithmaximalaccess
tonumerous
lacustrine
resources.
Theassociation
oflargequantities
oforganic
materials
as
wild
and
cultivated
bones
of
wa(such
plantremains,
migratory
withabundant
artifactual
remains
terfowl,
fish,and turtles)
(suchas
organic
tools(fiberscrapers),
baskets,ropes,andwovenmats),as wellas processing
involvedin the manufacture
and
suggestsa highlyspecializedcommunity
distribution
offinished
based
on
lacustrine
resources
within
the
southproducts
ernBasinofMexico.
thesuggestion
Additional
datareinforce
thatthemainsubsisarchaeological
tenceactivity
of theLate Formative
of
the
site
on the
centered
occupants
of
fish
lacustrine
and
other
resources,
exploitation
principally
aquaticfauna,
andthecollection
ofaquaticfiberplantsforthemanufacture
ofbaskets,mats,
andrope.The well-preserved
remains
of theseobjects,particarchaeological
25. The "oblongseed"mayin factbe Salvia sp. (chia). We do nothavesufficient
comparative
at present
to confirm
theidentification.
material
"Resultados
del AnilisisBotinico
26. Rosa MariaReynaRoblesandLauroGonzailez
Quintero,
Estadode Mdxico,"Arqueode Formaciones
Troncoc6nicas
en Loma Torremote,
Cuauhtitlan,
botdnica:
(INAH: Mexico,D.F. 1978)33-42.
Mgtodosy Aplicaciones
de RestosBotinicosProce27. McClungde Tapia,loc. cit.(in note22); idem,"Interpretaci6n
dentesde SitiosArqueol6gicos,"
17 (1980) 149-165.
Analesde Antropologia
R. Parsons,ElizabethM. Brumfiel,
28. Jeffrey
MaryH. Parsons,VirginiaPopper,andMary
on LakeChalco-Xochimilco:
Taft,"LatePrehispanic
Preliminary
Report,"
Agriculture
Chinampa
Nacionalde Antropologia
e Historia,
ResearchReportSubmitted
to theInstituto
Mexico,D.F.,
andtheNationalScienceFoundation,
D.C., 1982.
Washington,
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
JournalofField Archaeology/Vol.
13, 1986 113
withdefined
domestic
andcraftactivity
areas,29together
ularlyin association
withtheapparent
absenceof agricultural
tools,providesa broaderpictureof
economicactivity
in theBasinof MexicoduringtheFormative-Classic
transition.It is frequently
assumedthatagriculture
thefundamental
subprovided
sistenceactivityfor the majorityof the Late/Terminal
Formativeperiod
intheBasin.Terremote-Tlaltenco,
communities
however,
appearstorepresent
an exampleofa specializedoccupation
ina clearlydefined
ecologicalcontext.
evidencefromTerremote-Tlaltenco
the
Furthermore,
archaeological
supports
as yetuntested
thatFormative
assumption
periodsitesintheBasinweresituated
in areaswithaccessto specificresources,
to thedevelopment
of
contributing
theintensesymbiotic
thatarebelievedto characterize
socioeco- Figure10. Carbonized
relationships
of
cotyledons
nomicrelations
thesubsequent
ClassicandlaterPostclassic
Phaseolusspp.(Mound10,SquareC4,
during
periods.
We are suggesting
thatTerremote-Tlaltenco
maynotbe an essentially
agri- LayerII).
therearesignificant
ofagriculsettlement,
culturally-based
although
quantities
turalplantremainsamongthebotanicalspecimens
recovered.
In theirrecent
ofthearchaeological
from
summary
plantremains
Tolstoy'searlierexcavation
atEl Terremote,
totheapparent
SmithandTolstoy30call attention
significance
of wild plantmaterial:wild grassfoliageand stems(Gramineae);foliage,
of sedges(Cyperaceae);andOpuntiaseeds(Cactaceae).
stems,andrhizomes
Remainsof beans (Phaseolusvulgaris)weresparse,and carbonizedmaize
kernelsand cob fragments
thebulkof thesmallsamplethatwas
comprised
recovered.The extensiveexcavationof Terremote-Tlaltenco,
however,has
of cultivated
whichtendto balancethe
yieldedlargequantities
plantremains
a muchbroader
Thus,we areableto report
picturesomewhat.
rangeofplant
knownfromthe site. Identification
resourcesthanwas previously
of these
ofmoreconcrete
resources
theformulation
withrespect
to
permits
hypotheses
thenatureoftheFormative
lacustrine
subsistence
economyand,moreimportherelationship
betweenexploitative
andproductive
subsistence
activtantly,
itiesin a lacustrine
environment.
to Terremote-Tlaltenco
subthen,severalhypothetical
Initially
approaches
sistenceactivities
thepossibility
ofa "typical"
maybe considered:
agricultural
withaccesstoabundant
lacustrine
resources
as well;thepossibility
community
of a settlement
of lacustrine
redependent
principally
upontheexploitation
sourceswithagricultural
as a secondary
the
and,finally,
production
activity;
ofheavyconcentration
onthegathering
we favoratpresent,
ofwild
possibility
plantresources(forfood and raw materials),
supplemented
by agricultural
as thebasis of an
communities)
products
(probablyobtainedfrommainland
andfinishing
oflacustrine
bytheexploitation
products.
economydominated
I
6@*
0m
This content downloaded from 201.148.81.39 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:07:53 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions