PART 1: ON OUTLINING THE STRUCTURE ON HOW OUR EDA AGENCY AND AGENTS DO COMMERCE

Between now and the election, we are running 90% of financing thru the campaign accounts of all the districts.
This way the declared members get landed in their district registry, where ever they register; [for example]- the
resident works in Van-Centre and joined their club that's a VSMP agency, and this member lives in North Van
- in this case, the campaign donation would not go to the candidate in North Van, because there is no
candidate in North Van yet, so it would be transferred to the VSMP campaign. This structure creates
a ways and means for the members to be registered as being landed under common law in the District
they reside in, regardless of where they were declared a member by an EDA agency outside their District.
We have several EDAs, and we can set them up differently depending on what the individual circumstances are.
In most cases, the dispensary owner becomes the CEO or CFA, and they register their dispensary as the
EDA HEADquarters and a campaign HEADquarters on the EC 20383 form. In this case, while the election
writ is dropped means this CEO can be the candidate, or appoint a candidate, who is not an agent, and
there's no conflict with this dispensary being directly under the EDA. - in what ever case we are presented,
we can and will transfer this candidate to be an EDA officer or agent the day after the election is held.
In all EDAs, we're converting lots of dispensaries into agents /agencies, in order to be governed under common
law in order to protect their activities under blue zone territorial rights This is accomplished by properly filing 3
co-joined EC 20381 forms, where 2 agents [who are not a corporation] become EDA agents, then on a 3rd form
we create a new EDA agency that's a corporation [dispensary or a grower] with/from these 2 non-corp-individuals.
- This creates an arms length agreement from the EDA itself; this means the agencies can operate as an
in-transition BC Co-op, or [at least till the election is over] as a co-op structure under the Commissioner.
- [as we understand it] - The only reporting these agencies do to the EDA itself are these donations from
these [26,000- to 38,000] new members, who are now starting to feed our campaign drive, in our network
across our districts. Do the math, we should have a $150,000 budget for the Election, & a $250,000 yearly
budget to run one accounting office for our EDAs to organize 100s of agencies across the Fraser Valley.

- Our election plan is to collect funds on Sunday, and book adds /posters / fliers /events/ for the next week,
AND do it again next Sunday in this way we spend these funds to bring more members to our EDA
agencies, which creates 'a snow-ball effect' on promoting our 'commercial premises' [big word in law]

- In this way, we only spend what we actually hold [no election campaign will run on red ink - period]
- These dispensary [arms-length sales to our members by our non-corp-agents] are not done by our EDA itself
- We don't get a penny from their sales - these agencies employ our non-corp-agents and they feed us
members; as we see it the EC 20031/20081 forms will only show agents fund raising for memberships.

The agency will operate with day sheets as outlined in IC75 2R8 structure and in this way the cannabis
activities of the EDA agency are not under our EDA's scope to administer, because it's at arms length

All these non-corp-agents do is what any campaign /EDA agents do, which is to file election campaign
contributions that are made by a new member who is converting over to our common law form,
- These agents are probably never getting a day-sheet from the EDA - they are covered by the day-sheet of the
agency [not the EDA] - most agents will file a nil/nil/nil report with EC, because they never worked directly for us.
- They report to their agency and these payments /transactions are called pay-days, for value rendered.
- PLEASE RESPECT THAT: any small group of dedicated individuals can create an EDA anywhere in Canada.
- We're the only body that can legitimately protect the 30,000+ growers [who grew under the MMAR] from being
construed as criminals under Federal governance, because our EDA growers are not under the CDSA's control.
TAKE NOTE THAT: when those Federal Court rulings [like the Allard decision] are handed down as being
Supreme, means [by doing nothing] you fall under the CDSA's control to be subjected to their abuse.

BOTTOM LINE: [because we're a 1-issue party, means there's no ambiguity in our trust or contracts [under R v
Oakes or Therens]; therefor we can self -regulate our activities under common law, thru consent of the governed.
- We're a common law body that's actually called 'the Loyal Opposition' in Parliament. We uphold a long
tradition of protecting ourselves from the disloyal majority in power who trample on our fundamental rights
Harper's treacherous deeds have never worked, because no body can govern without fundamental Justice
THEREFOR under our fiduciary trust, we must protect our public trust in order to stand-under common law
jurisdiction as Supreme, in order to stop the CDSA from destroying what our real Sovereignty is all about.
What we're undertaking strikes deep at thwarting anything their New World Order is undermining.

Part 2 - ON HOW TO REGISTER AN EDA page by page line by line detail on how to register an EDA.
1 First, call Blair Longley by emailing him [ info@marijuanaparty.ca ] and request a certificate for your EDA to be
registered, and email Gary Rozon [the auditor] [ garyrozon@rogers.com ] to forward you his certificate
request that they be emailed in order to file with Election Canada asap, and send hard copy by mail
[for things like a bank account they sometimes want to see the original]
2 - Fill a EC 20383 form [it's 9-pages long] - http://www.elections.ca/pol/dis/formsreg/ec20383_e.pdf
on page 2 check box 3 and put the name of the CEO and sign it check option 3 and fill in part-2 with
electoral district info -[on most computers, this form can be filled electronically, by having a free Adobe program]
on page 3 D - check new CEO and fill in their home address in the box
NOTE: if you have a dispensary location, register it as the mailing address
E - just check this box, and that mail will be sent to your mailing address
add your email address it really is important to not have to wait for snail mail
F- just check the 3rd box and they now have on record, where your books /articles are kept;
this is where you could put the confidential address of a grow-op, as a registered blue zone.
IMPORTANT: To be a CFA , all you really need to have is experience at running the books for a small company.
And you'll be able to handle the paperwork, especially if you're running this EDA /or agency with a Quickbooks
accounting program or any POS system. These books are essential to trust that proper inventory control exists.
on page 4 this is the CFA information page fill in the box as if you are an individual, also fill in that you
are a corps [put the EDA name/abbreviation there] and the mailing address can be a dispensary
or another grow-op there and sign it. [leave no box unchecked - like date and Mr/Ms]
page 5- leave it blank, do nothing with it the auditor will file this certificate with Elections Canada auditors
on page 6 add the candidate's name with the title candidate Add any association officers [only the CFA
and CEO hold signing authority for the EDA]. All officers are directly under this EDA's territorial trust rights.
page 7 leave it blank, do nothing with it Blair Longley fills in this page and will send it to you.
on page 8 there is nothing to do with it now BUT this where the CEO could fire /de-certify any officer.
on page 9 list the CEO the CFA and any officers again [it goes to another department]
THAT's IT email this whole EC 20383 file to Elections Canada, add the certificates that Blair and Gary sent, and
the 2 scanned pages [page 2 and 4] to show signatures attached. IF YOU WANT? Blair Longley or Marc Boyer,
will answer questions by phone and we will proof read your forms before you file them, just to be safe.
and POOF like magic you and all the officers and under common law, and all the addresses are blue
zoned. What's a blue zone it's like being on a native band council land Maritime police can't trespass it
NOT ONE ARBITRARY RULE OR REGULATION THAT THE CDSA IMPLEMENTS APPLIES TO
YOU, BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION OVER OUR COMMON LAW FEDERAL BODY
Everyone who is a registered agent or member, of an organized Marijuana Party EDA simply cannot be
summoned to go to FEDERAL COURT because they are directly forbidden to intervene. [no jurisdiction]
There already is BCSC case law to grow for a dispensary, our EDA agencies can sell to any adult /resident
who is eligible to vote no medical note is necessary unless the member is not landed /cannot vote.
None of our members can be sent to Federal court, but they might be subject to public nuisance by-law
tickets, but frankly we've not challenged that, first we need someone charged, then we can challenge it.
BECAUSE R v SMITH IS A UNANIMOUS SUPREME COURT OF CANADA DECISION, MEANS IT ACTUALLY
IS CALLED SEDITION FOR ANY POLICE OFFICER TO ACT LIKE MARITIME LAW CAN OVERIDE THE SCC,
Had it not been unanimous the Crown would have an excuse that a dissenting judge said they could.

No cop, prosecutor or judge will mis'take' you to be under CDSA rule, because they could get 10-years
for sedition this kind of violation of the Act are enforced by the Commissioner's Prosecution Office.
The SCC ruled that the Institution called CDSA is of no force and effect [period]; this means none of their
rules can control or prohibit our activities, because we are residing under common law jurisdiction
This EDA loophole simply means the Crown is directly prohibited from applying CDSA charges and send
us to Federal Court BECAUSE they can't. The BCSC will uphold that the CDSA is of no force or effect
against any Marijuana Party member or agent or officer who is not violating a BCSC case law precedent
No Maritime authority can act on enforcing the CDSA on any land registered with the District, because of
our no jurisdiction defence. The case is actually thrown out at the arraignment, and damages paid quickly.
Our defence is bulletproof regrettably we're not

- We're so far left that we are right!