Professional Documents
Culture Documents
H.I.P.L
CONTENTS
-DECLARATION
-ACKNOWLADGEMENT
CHAPTER-5
♦ FINDING
♦ SUGGESTION
♦ CONCLUSION
♦ QUESTIONAIRE
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
♦ BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER - I
INTRODUCTION:
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
:: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ::
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION :-
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
HIPL – VISION
“To be a World class product leader through the
state of the art manufacturing technologies and processes”
HIPL – MISSION :
“HR DEPT Will facilitate achievement of the highest
level of organization productivity by achieving cost
effectiveness in administration activity and by sourcing the
best human talent available. And add value to them through
practice prompt and continuous programs by realization of
employee potential to achieve excellence. In company
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
PRODUCTION :
HTPL production “Sponze iron” which is semi-
finished goods. It requires manufacturing steel. Almost HTPL is
using modern techniques of production. Through this they are
manufacturing 100 tons per day. The sponze iron costs to
Rs.10,200-00 per ton.
RAW MATERIAL:
To produce sponze Iron they require raw-materials
as follows :-
1. Iron ore (Fe2O3) (4 to 18mm)
2. Coal (4 to 18 mm)
3. Dolomite / lime stone (0.2%)
PRODUCTION PROCESS :
To make ready sponze Iron they are heating Iron
Ore by Coal and diesel and after completion of first process
they want to remove sulfur constraints.
RAW-MATERIALS PURCHASED FROM:
1. Iron Ore-from R.P.P mines Hospet.
2. Coal-from South Africa, Indonesia, South Korea and
Singrahi.
3. Lime Stone – from Locapure which comes under Baglkot
district.
MACHINERY.
1. Kiln
2. Cooler
3. Screens
4. Crushers
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
MAN POWER.
Man power is major aspect of any business or
organizational activity with out man no production and no
business are based on man power of the organization.
Success of every organization is depending on the man power
of the organization.
There are three types of workers-
• Technical
• Non-technical
• Lab our Group.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
3. Incentives.
4. Loan Facility
5. Bonus.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Sl.
No. Derivative Plans Programs Activities
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Appraisals
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Attitude Cover
Motivation reschedule
Steps
HR Practice :
1. Safety Measurements Providing
2. Health and Happy work place
3. Open book Management style
4. Performance link Management
5. 3600 Performance Management feedback system
6. Fair
7. Knowledge Sharing
8. Open house Meetings
9. Feedback Mechanism
10. Highlights performances
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Personnel Administration
Industrial relation :-
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
A. Canteen Administration.
B. Monitoring Activities of Security & House Keeping
Personnel.
C. Ensuring Security & Safety of Company Properties &
People.
QUALITY POLICIES :-
Out aim is to remain the first choice of our neighboring clients
for best grade in Sponze Iron. We strongly believe in the
philosophy of Continual Improvement and we are committed
to demonstrate them by the following guiding principles
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
3. Job analysis
4. Salary administration.
5. Performance Appraisal.
6. Grievance.
RECRUITMENT POLICIES :-
1) Provide formal statement of corporate thinking.
2) Establish consistency in application of policy over a
period.
3) Offer guidelines to managers for thinking action.
4) Improve communication and secure co-operation
from employees.
5) Provide criteria (measuring yards) for Performance
evaluation of persons involved in recruitment.
6) Build employees enthusiasm and loyalty and
increase their confidence.
SELECTION POLICIES :-
1. Selection Criteria.
2. Selection Process.
3. Decision – Making
4. Communication.
SAFETY POLICIES
Below mentioned safety and health measures
implemented for the study of work man :
1. Safety shoes
2. Safety helmet
3. Nose mask
4. Safety goggles
5. Ear plugs
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
STOCK HOUSE
MARKETING AREA
HIPL produces semi ready made material or we can
call as raw-material for steel makers. So there is no need of
market their self, Just they are receiving order from other
companies and manufacturing as per as their requirement.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
COMPETITORS :
The following are the competitors of this company.
They are as follows :-
1. Hare Krishna Company.
2. Dhruvadesh Company.
3. HKT Company.
Leave system
SL (Sick Leave)
CL (Casual Leave)
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Types of Industries.
• Which Industries are having 5 lakhs to 1 crore amount in
producing many turnover that is called as small factory.
• Which type of industries having amount of 1 crore to 5
cores it is call as medium.
• And which type of company has above 5 corers is in
considered as large scale industries.
PF System of HIPL :-
Employee’s Provident Fund :-
The employees and employees jointly distribute the
PF the employees share 12% amount from their salary and
employers are sharing 12% amount to PF.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Assistant Assistant
3) Electrical Department :-
In this department the electrical engineers having
fully responsibly on that department they maintain the
electrical department.
4) Lab :-
In this department they’re all chemistry
backgrounds that is handling all lab works, which is related to
production activities of HIPL.
5) HRM Departments:-
These departments only maintain the administration
of the HIPL.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
HR Ex administration
Deputy Manger
Assistant Assistant
Assistant
Sweeper
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Identification of Process
Sl. Process
No.
1 Customer related process
2 Resource M. Resources
3 Purchase related process
4 Production Process
5 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement process
6 Process of control of Monitoring and Measurement
Device
7 Management Review process
8 Document control process
9 Record control process
1. Purpose
2. Scope
3. Application
4. Input Process out put.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
CHAPTER – 3
INTRODUCTION:
Performance Appraisal:-
The history of performance appraisal is quite brief. Its
roots in the early 20th century can be traced to Taylor’s
pioneering Time and Motion studies. But this is not very
helpful for the same may be said about almost everything in
the field of modern human resources management.
As a distance and formal management procedure used
in the evaluation of work performance, appraisal really dates
from the time of the Second World War- not more than 60
years ago.
Yet in a broader sense, the practice of appraisal is a
very ancient art. In the scale of things historical, it might well
lay claim to being the world’s second oldest profession!
There is, say Dulewicz (1989)”.. a basic human
tendency to make judgments about those one is working with,
as well as about one self”. Appraisal, it seems, is both
inevitable and universal. In the absence of a carefully
structured system of appraisal, people will tend to judge the
work performance of others, including subordinates, naturally,
formally and arbitrarily.
The human inclination to judge can create serious
motivational, ethical and legal problems in the work place.
Without a structured appraisal system, there is little chance of
ensuring that the judgments made will be lawful, fair,
defensible and accurate.
Performance appraisal systems began as simple
methods of income justification. That is, appraisal was used to
decide whether or not the salary or wage of an individual
employee was justified.
The process was firmly linked to material outcomes. If
an employee’s performance was found to be less than ideal, a
cut pay would follow. On other hand, if their performance was
better than the supervisor expected, a pay rise was in order.
Little consideration, if any, was given to the
development possibilities of appraisal. If was felt that a cut in
pay, or a rise, should provide the only required impetus for an
employee to either improve or continue to perform well.
Some times this basic system succeeded in getting the
result that were intended, but more often than not, it failed.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Controversy :-
Few issues in management stir up more controversy
than performance appraisal.
There are many reputable – researchers, management
commentators, and psychometricians - who have expressed
doubts about the validity and reliability of the performance
appraisal process. Some have even suggested that the
process is so inherently flawed that it may be impossible to
perfect it (see Derven, 1990, for example),
At the other extreme, there are many strong advocates
of performance appraisal. Some view it as potentially”..” the
most crucial aspect of organization life” ( Lawrie, 1990).
Between these two extremes lie various schools of
belief. While all endorse the use of performance appraisal,
there are many different opinions on how and when to apply
it.
There are those, for instance, who believe that
performance appraisal has many important employees
development uses, but scorn any attempt to link the process
is perceived as judgmental, punitive and harrowing.
This group believes that the linkage to reward out
comes reduces or eliminates the developmental value of
appraisals. Rather than an opportunity for constructive review
and encouragement, the reward linked process is perceived
as judgmental, punitive and harrowing.
For example, how many people would gladly admit their
work problems if, at the same time, they knew that their next
pay rise or a much – wanted promotion was riding on an
appraisal result? Very likely, in that situation, many people
would deny or downplay their weaknesses.
Nor is the desire to distort or deny the truth confined to
the person being appraised. Many appraisers feel
uncomfortable with the combined role of judge and
executioner.
Such reluctance is not difficult to understand.
Appraisers often know their appraises well, and are typically
in a direct subordinate-supervisor relationship. They work
together on a daily basis and may, at times, mix socially.
Suggesting that a subordinate needs to brush up on certain
work skills is one thing, giving an appraisal result that has the
direct effect of neglecting a promotion is another.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Performance appraisal :-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to : navigation, search
Performance appraisal, also known as employee
appraisal, is a method by which the job performance of an
employee is evaluated (generally in terms of quality,
quantity, cost and time). Performance appraisal is a part of
career development.
Performance appraisals are regularly reviews of
employee performance within organization.
Generally, the aims of a performance appraisal are to :
♦ Give feedback on performance to employees.
♦ Identity employee training need.
♦ Document criteria used to allocate organizational
rewards.
♦ Form a basis for personnel decisions: salary increases,
promotions, disciplinary actions, etc.
♦ Provide the opportunity for organizational diagnosis and
development
♦ Facilitate communication between employee ad
administrators
♦ Validate selection techniques and human resource
policies to meet federal Equal Employment Opportunity
requirements.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
MORDEN-METHOD
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Establishing performance
standards
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Discussing results
( Providing feedback )
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
DECISSION MAKING
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
[edit] References
[edit] Sources
• Thomas F.Patterson (1987), “Refining Performance
Appraisal” (HTML). Retrieved on 2007-01-18.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
A) Key result areas and forget fixed for the year 2007
Down key Discussion
Areas of
Listing result Key between date /
Target
result Areas Month
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Job Knowledge :-
2) Understanding of duties and responsibilities.
3) Mastery of skill and knowledge
4) Understanding and operation of equipments
5) Understanding and promotion of Departments
6) Staying abreast of how Development
Comments :-
Dependability :-
1) Meeting commitments and work standards
2) Ability to work independently
3) Acceptance of accountability
4) Adaptation to changes
5) Staying to us under pressure
6) Meeting time and attendance requirements and drodline.
Comments :-
Quality :-
1) Quality consciousness
2) Commitment to quality standards
3) Efforts at continuous improvement
4) Monitoring to quality levels and developing and
implementing effective solutions.
5) Adherences to safety pillaging .
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Comments :-
Commutation :-
2) Readiness to listen quality listing
3) Acceptability and willingness to share information
4) Clarity and effectiveness in oral an written
communication
5) Maintain confidentiality
Working Relationship
1) Response to internal and external customs
2) Co-operatively with project teammates
3) Exchange of ideas and opinion
4) Effectiveness in conflict resolution
5) Flexibility and open mindedness
6) Politeness / Courtesy
7) Meeting commitments customers commitments.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Training needs
Related to job
Development
Related to Environment
Related to fire and safety
Department :
Designation :
Signature :
H.R.D Sign. :
M.D. Sign. :
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
CHAPTER – 4
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – I
Whether the respondents are aware of performance
appraisal system.
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Yes 30 100
No
Total 30 100
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 2
Performance appraisal undergone at H.I.P.L
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Yearly 30 100%
Yearly twice
Yearly thrice
More than thrice
Total 30 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Table-3
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 4
Whether the respondents are satisfied about
organization feed back system.
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Satisfied 24 82.5%
Normal 06 17.5%
Dissatisfied 00 00.00
Total 30 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 5
There was / Is their proper provision of performance
feed back
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Yes 26 85.8%
No 04 14.2%
Total 30 100%/
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 6
Are the respondents think that the performance
management system in accordance with selection policy.
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Agree 21 69.6%
Disagree 01 9.9%
Don’t Know 06 19.8%
Total 30 100.00%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 7
Are the respondent mention records of event they
have accomplished?
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Always 18 59.4%
Most of time 06 19.8%
Certain time 06 19.8%
Total 30 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 8
Whether the respondents are feel that performance
appraisal is necessary to the organization.
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Yes 24 79.2%
No 06 20.8%
Total 00 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 9
Are the respondents feel that performance appraisal
is necessary to the organization?
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Yes 20 66.7%
No 10 33.3%
Total 30 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 10
Are the respondents feel performance appraisal
report constitutes important factor which selecting employee
training and development program?
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Yes 24 79.92%
No 06 19.98%
Total 30 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 11
Are the respondents feeling training and
development seminars conferences help them to improving
the performance.
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Yes 21 69.93%
No 09 29.9%
Total 30 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
TABLE – 12
Are the respondents fell prides in working with this
organization?
Opinion Frequency Percentage
Always 15 50%
Most of time 06 20%
Certain time 09 30%
Total 30 100%
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
CHAPTER – 5
MAJOR FINDING
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
SUGGESTIONS
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
CONCLUSION
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
QUESTIONNAIRE
A STUDY ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IN
H.I.P.L
Dear Sir/Madam,
I Mis.BASAVARAJESHWARI.M.D am a student of BBM
Pursuing my V Sem as part of my course. I am required to do
a project work on “A STUDY ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
SYSTEM IN H.I.P.L. The above mentioned topic. I will be
grateful if you kindly answer with your valuable response.
Your valuable time is assured of confidentiality.
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
Yes No
1
PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL
H.I.P.L
BEBILOGRAPHY
[edit] References
[edit] sources
• Thomas F.Patterson (1987) “Refining Performance
Appraisal” (HTML) Retrieved on 2007-01-18.
• Joyce Margulies (2004-03-24). “Performance Appraisals”
(PDF) Retrieved on 2007-01-18
• 1998, Archer North & Associatiates, Introduction to
Performance Appraisal, http;//www.performance-
appraisal.com/intro.htm
• U.S. Department of the Interior, Performance Appraisal
handbook.