You are on page 1of 8

DETERMINATION

TECHNIQUE

OF

AQUIFER

POROSITY

USING

RESISTIVITY

IMAGING

By:

Abdelatif Mokhtar Ahmed1 and Wan Norazmin Sulaiman2


1-College of Water Science and Technology, Sudan University of Science and Technology, PO Box 352, Khartoum North, Sudan,
2-Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Science and Environmental Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

KEYWORDS: Resisyivity, Porosity

and Groundwater

ABSTRACT
This paper is an attempt to investigate the groundwater aquifer porosity in the
area south of Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia. Other groundwater aquifer characteristics
such as the aquifer thickness, depth to aquifer, and aquifer type were determined.
Resistivity imaging survey was used as the main technique to investigate the aquifer
characteristics, and mainly the aquifer porosity. Electrical resistivity imaging survey
line was conducted in the area south of Kuala Lumpur City, and around the Malaysian
Agricultural Research Institute. A relationship between the resistivity and formation
factor was established, and used for plotting of porosity distribution along the same
line. Porosity values along this line were found to range between 6 to 33%. Three
porosity zones were determined; arenitic schist with porosity values between 6 and
10%, schist with porosity values between 10 and 17%, and fissured phyllite with
porosity values between 17 and 33%. Thickness of the top layer (Arenitic Schist of
kenny Hill Formation), was estimated to range between 1.2 and 10 ms, while the
depth to aquifer was estimated to range between 7 and 10 ms. The aquifer was
determined to be unconfined and of good quality and can yield good quantities of
water.
:

.( )
.
.%33 6
. 10 - 7

.
INTRODUCTION
Groundwater is important as a source of drinking water as well as for
irrigation and industrial use (Canter and Knox, 1995). The amount of water required
to society has increased as population and urbanization increased. As a result there is
a growing demand for groundwater (Kobus, 1996). Large percentage of population
worldwide still depends on ground water as the main supply for a variety of purposes
such as drinking, irrigation, recreation, and industry. The amount of groundwater in a
certain aquifer is a function of its porosity. The availability of groundwater in
Malaysian aquifers is abundant and the storage is estimated about 64 billion cubic
meters per year, and is still far untapped for public and industrial consumption except
in Kota Bharu and several places in Sarawak (Nawang, 1993). This study has been
conducted around Kuala Lumpur City (Malaysia), within a tropical humid climate
characterized by high rainfall, to determine the extend of porosity of Kenny Hill
Formation aquifer. The main technique used was the resistivity imaging survey. The
electrical imaging survey is a technique recently developed to investigate areas of
complex geology where the use of resistivity sounding and profiling is inadequate

(Griffiths and Barker, 1993). The 2-D resistivity model for subsur-face is obtained using
an automatic inversion computer program (RES2DINV), which uses the techniques
developed by (Loke and Barker 1996).
LOCATION AND GEOLOGY
The study area extending from the landfill of Sri Petaling in the north to
Serdang, UPM (Universiti Putra Malaysia), and the Malaysian Agricultural Research
and Development Institute (Mardi) areas in the south as can be seen from (Fig. 1).
The study area covering an area of about 57.4 km and underlain by the Kenny Hill
formation. Other rock units surrounding the area comprise the granitic rocks and
Kuala Lumpur Limestone (Fig. 2). The name of the Kenny Hill Formation has been
used for a number of years for a sequence of clastic sedimentary rocks occurring in
Kuala Lumpur area. It was shown by that the clastic rocks fall into two groups, one
underlying and the other group overlying the limestone, which is now known to be at
least in part Silurian (Gobbett and Hutchson, 1973). The younger clastic sequence has
been called the Kenny Hill Formation after exposures in Kenny Hill residential area
of Kuala Lumpur town. Kenny Hill Formation exists as a broad synclinal belt,
generally 7 to 10 km wide, running from Kuala Lumpur city center southward through
the shrubs of Petaling and Petaling Jaya and further to the south for at least 30 km
(Fig. 2).

Fig. (1): Location Map of the Study Area

Fig. (2): Geological Setting of the Study Area

MATERIALS AND METHODS


An OYO McOhm Resistivity Meter was used to obtain a 2 Dimensional electrical
resistivity image along Line Mardi 1 (located at the southern part of the study area),
which was taken to investigate the aquifer porosity. The electrodes were connected to
the central switching system. The current and potential poles of the McOhm OYO
Resistivity Meter were connected to the central switching system. Four electrodes were
chosen at any one time for resistance measurement. Currents were injected into the
ground via two current electrodes located to the exterior of the potential electrodes.
The potential difference between the potential electrodes was measured and the
resistance of the ground was calculated automatically by the meter. The measured
resistances were recorded into a pre-prepared data entry sheet. The electrode

configuration used in the present survey is that of Wenner Array. Resistance values were
converted into apparent resistivity values a using an equation: a = 2 aR
Schist

Arenitic Schist of Kenny Hill Formation

Fissured Phyllite
Fig. (3): Resistivity Image alongLine Mardi 1

Where (a) is the spacing used in the measurement and (R) is the resistance of the
ground recorded by McOhm OYO Resistivity Meter. The x position of measurement
along the resistivity traverse, the electrode spacing, and the calculated apparent
resistivity values were entered into the data files, which were subsequently used by the
RES2DINV 2 Dimensional Resistivity Imaging Interpretation software. The
interpretation programmer essentially calculates the true resistivity and true depth of the
ground from the inputted data file using Jacobian Matrix Calculation and Forward
Modelling procedures. The results of the interpretation are displayed as the 2-D
electrical resistivity image of the subsurface along the line of traverse. In this study
the line used and the generated resistivity image is that of Mardi 1 (Fig. 3). Laboratory
measure-ments on the electrical resistivity and effective porosity of rock and soil
samples were conducted so as to be able to appreciate the significance of the
resistivity values measured in the field.
In a fully saturated, clay-free granular formation the rock resistivity Rt is
related to the resistivity of the formation water by the following expression: Rt = F *
Rw
The constant of proportionality, F, being known as the formation factor. This
linear relationship is often referred to as Archies Law (Archie, 1942). The formation
factor, F, is found to be related to the effective porosity, , through the following
equation: F = a-m
Where and m are imperical constants within a formation or a section of a
formation. Laboratory investigations have been carried out to determine these
constants. The laboratory established relationship between formation factor and the
effective porosity was applied to the field data (In this study data was collected from
Line Mardi 1), to calculate the porosity values of the formation. These values were

contoured and plotted using DIPIX-PLUS software (Stoyer, 1987). The contouring is in a
form of a pseudosection (as shown by (Fig. 4), of Line Mardi 1).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Resistivity Image along Line Mardi 1: This line was conducted in Universiti
Putra Malaysia (UPM) farms, west of the main building of the university. The length of
this line is 250 m with 392 total number of datum points. (Fig. 3) shows the resistivity
image of this line. The most prominent features which can be seen from the resistivity
image along this line are the high resistive layer on the top of the image with
resistivity values ranging from 194 to 2156 m and a thickness of about 7 to 15 m.
This layer reflects an irregular topography of the conductive zone lying below it. This
layer is interpreted as arenitic schist of Kenny Hill Formation and it is a dry top layer
and not indicative of potential water bearing zone (Venkateswara and Briz-Kishore
1991). The low resistive zone (7.8 to 17.4 m) situated in the center of the image is
interpreted as fissured phyllite. The large zone occupying most of the image with
resistivity values of 17.4 to 194 m represents the porous aquifer was interpreted as
schist. The interpretation of this image was based on the lithological logs of bore
holes drilled in this area.
Porosity Distribution along Line Mardi 1: Porosity values along this line range
between 6 to 33%. (Fig. 4) shows the porosity distribution along this line. By
comparing this section with the resistivity distribution along the same line (Fig. 3),
three porosity zones are determined; arenitic schist with porosity values between 6
and 10%, schist with porosity values between 10 and 17%, and fissured phyllite with
porosity values between 17 and 33%. Both the schist and fissured phyllite represent
the aquifer materials. Thickness of the top layer (Arenitic Schist of Kenny Hill
Formation), was estimated to range between 1.2 and 10 ms. The aquifer was
determined to be unconfined. The depth to aquifer was estimated to range between 7
and 10ms. Aquifer porosity ranging between 20% and 33% was regarded as excellent
(Cosse, 1993), while the study area (Line Mardi 1), ranging between 10% and 33%
can be estimated as good porosity.

Fig. (4): Subsurface porosity distribution along line MARDI 1

CONCLUSION
From the discussion of the resistivity section and the porosity distribution along
Line Mardi 1, it can be concluded that, the resistivity imaging survey technique is useful

for the determination of groundwater aquifer porosity, and hence is useful for
determination of water quantity in the groundwater aquifers of different formation.
The wide difference in resistivity values between the different lithological beds
could be attributed to the significant difference in porosity, mineralogy, water saturation
and type of fluid content i.e., water quality either fresh or saline which greatly affect the
resistivity values. From the above discussion it can be concluded that the groundwater
aquifer of Mardi area is of good quality and can yield good quantities of water.

REFERENCES
1- Archie, G. E. (1942). The electrical resistivity logs as an aid in determining some
reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mineralogical and
Metallurgical Engineers 146: PP: [54-62].
2- Canter, L. W. and R. C. Knox. (1995). Groundwater pollution control. Lewis publishers,
Inc. MI.
3- Cosse, R. (1993). Basics of reservoir engineering, Gulf publishing Company.
4- Gobbett, D. J. and C. S. Hutchison, (1973). Geology of the Malay Peninsula, John Wiley
and Sons, New York.
5- Griffiths, D. H. and D. Barker, (1993). Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and
modeling in areas of complex geology. Journal of Applied Geophysics 29: PP: [211226].
6- Kobus, H. (1996). Hydraulics for sustainable water resources development. Proc. 10 th
Congress of the Asia-Pacific Division of IAHR. Langkawi, Malaysia.
7- Loke, M. H. and R. D. Barker (1996). Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent
resistivity pseudosections by a Quasi-Newton method. Journal of Geophysical
Prospecting 44: PP: [131-152].
8- Nawang, W. M. (1993). Sources of groundwater pollution. In Department of
Environment, Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia, eds. N.
Mustafa and R. Hashim. Department of Environment, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
9- Stoyer, C. H. (1987). Induced Polarization and resistivity data pseudosec-tion plotting
software for IBM PC compatible user manual.
10- Venkateswara, R. B. and B. H. Briz-Kishore. (1991). A methodology for locating
potential aquifers in a typical semiarid region in India using resistivity and
hydrogeologic parameters. Journal of Geoexploration. 27: PP: [55-64].

You might also like